Files in the Dataset have been checked for format consistency, and merged into a single, integrated, downloadable file.Download Entire Dataset Submit Data For This Cruise How to Cite Dataset
Bottle file has been converted to exchange and put online.
Pressure sorted bottle file. Ran wocecvt with no errors. Added name/date stamp. Replaced current online file and moved old version to original with dated name.
Removed all place holding dashes from sumfile. Ran sumchk with no errors. Added time/name stamp. Moved old file to original directory and linked newly edited file to web. Edited index.htm page to indicate action and RCS'd
CTD has been converted to exchange and put online. Data was checked with JOA and put online.
As per Gould's email I have replaced the current AR12 74AB59_1 with the new files obtained via ftp. Replaced were: sumfile, ctd files, and bottle file (new bottle file contains sal, O2, silicate, nitr_ate_, phosphate, CFC11/12/113). Data are public, tables are updated.
I just want to clarify (Sorry for the constant replies) that the files we grabbed for the cruises below are to completely replace what we currently have up on the website. The files recently obtained are drastically different, not just in station/sample/bottle numbers, but in values of other parameters as well (ctdpress/tmp/sal, etc.). Can you please confirm that the files obtained from the ftp site are to completely replace ours or get relevant parameters merged into what we hold now.
I've been looking through your holding of data from the Vivaldi '91 cruises of 74AB58_1 74AB59_1 (WOCE AR12). The bottle CFC data appear to be an old set. I have a replacement set along with nutrients and carbon system variables. I had a lot of problems trying to sort out this data. There are also CTD profile data files which have correct station numbers. The files you currently store have BODC reference 'key' numbers from the Oracle database. Similarly, the bottle data. These data were submitted to you by BODC a long time ago, not sure by whom. I am checking other UK WOCE data sets incase. Those I've personally sent you in the past are okay and up to date. Let me know of any problems and sorry for the re-submission.
Harry and I have no objection to this release. Thanks for the reminder. Raymond