Files in the Dataset have been checked for format consistency, and merged into a single, integrated, downloadable file.
Download Entire Dataset Submit Data For This Cruise How to Cite DatasetCCHDO-1.0 CF netCDF files converted from bottle exchange file
CCHDO-1.0 CF netCDF files converted from ctd exchange file
31WTTUNES_1 processing - BTL
2022-08-19
A Barna
Submissions
id submit date submitted by file name
---- ------------- -------------- ------------
9339 p17c_hy1.csv
Changes
* Changed HELIER units from UMOL/KG to NMOL/KG as per data submission from Jenkins
* Changed C14ERR and C13ERR units from PERCNT to /MILLE (confirmed with the original NOSAMS data report #94-093)
note: unresolved flags for DELHE3
31WTTUNES_1_hy1.csv and 31WTTUNES_1_nc_hyd.zip opened in JOA with no apparent problems.
Conversions
note: converted and put online by C Berys
file converted from software
---------------------- ------------------- -----------------------
31WTTUNES_1_nc_hyd.zip 31WTTUNES_1_hy1.csv hydro 0.8.2-61-g3353cfe
31WTTUNES_1hy.txt 31WTTUNES_1_hy1.csv hydro 0.8.2-61-g3353cfe
Updated Files Manifest
file stamp
---------------------- -----------------
31WTTUNES_1_hy1.csv 20220819CCHSIOAMB
31WTTUNES_1_nc_hyd.zip 20220819CCHSIOAMB
31WTTUNES_1hy.txt 20220819CCHSIOAMB
There is not enough information to know where this file should go in the timeline.
There is not enough information to know where this file should go in the timeline.
There is not enough information to know where this file should go in the timeline.
There is not enough information to know where this file should go in the timeline.
There is not enough information to know where this file should go in the timeline.
There is not enough information to know where this file should go in the timeline.
There is not enough information to know where this file should go in the timeline.
There is not enough information to know where this file should go in the timeline.
There is not enough information to know where this file should go in the timeline.
There is not enough information to know where this file should go in the timeline.
There is not enough information to know where this file should go in the timeline.
There is not enough information to know where this file should go in the timeline.
Subject: p17c delhe3 and helium
Hielium and delhe3 on P17C, station 14, bottle 19 at 1202.8 dbar are 0.00. This can't be right. (We've had other spurious 0 values in the past, from the originator's files.) I suggest replacing it with a -9 and -999. I'll also email Bill Jenkins as I suspect it's his data set, as it's upper ocean.
I have changed the helium and delhe3 values in the P17C bottle file at station 14, bottle 19 from 0.0 values to missing values (-9) along with associated flags as per Lynne Talley's email below.
This note was added to the 00_README file in the original directory. All previous files were
copied to the original directory and new .csv and netCDF files were generated with no errors.
All new files link online.
Made changes to the DELHE3 re emails from Lynne Talley and Bill Jenkins. Put file online, made new exchange file, sent notes to Jerry.
Notes on merging:
Made changes to the DELHE3 re email from Lynne Talley and Bill Jenkins.
On Oct. 15, 2003 Lynne Talley wrote:
Sarilee and Dave - I had forwarded this message to whpo in June 2002, from Bill Jenkins. I'm looking at the delhe3 in p17c right now, and there are still bad values at
station 29, bottle 1 and
station 41, bottle 3
Bill says they did not sample or report values for these bottles.
I see this message in the Data History as well. So I think we had best set these values to -9. Can you double check that other changes listed here for delhe3 on p17c have been made? (station 123)
When I look at the file at station 123, I see a whole lot of zero values, which would be wrong, and don't see qflags.
Thanks - Lynne
On June 7, 2002 William Jenkins wrote:
Hi Lynne. I'm a bit confused and trying to figure things out here. I don't believe we reported a station 29 bottle 1 for P17c. We reported data for bottles 2,4,6,7,9,10,12 and 14 for that station. Same issue for station 41. We didn't analyze a bottle 3 there. We only reported data for bottles 2,4<=>16,18 and 19.
By the way, negative values for del3He are certainly valid, and should not be set to zero. Zero values for del3He may not necessarily mean a problem, but I'll go through the numbers you listed.
We took some copper tube samples from station 123 (bottles 2<=>17) on P17c. Although the samples were analyzed on the mass spectrometer, the results were not processed appropriately (they slipped through the net) yet somehow got included in the submission. The best thing to do here is to eliminate them for the atlas, and we'll see if we can recalculate them and resubmit them later.
Sample 121-1-8 (160.8 dbar) was underextracted (procedural problem) and should be eliminated.
Sample 121-1-5 (110.8 dbar) should be fine: the del3He = -0.004% (thus was rounding to zero for you)
Sample 116-1-4 (80.1 dbar) was not analyzed by us (I don't know how it got in the mix)
Sample 110-1-9 (212.2 dbar) was a failed analysis and should not have been reported
Sample 110-1-11 (310.3 dbar) was not analyzed by us for helium
Samples 80-1-X (82-150 dbar) were not analyzed by us for helium (I don't know why, but they weren't)
Sample 65-1-4 (73 dbar) wasn't analyzed by us for helium
Sample 65-1-13 (610 dbar) wasn't analyzed by us for helium
Sample 54-1-8 (241 dbar) was underextracted (procedural problem) and should be eliminated
Sample 48-1-7 (232 dbar) wasn't analyzed by us for helium
Sample 44-1-14 (601 dbar) was underextracted (procedural problem) and should be eliminated
Sample 33-1-11 (300 dbar) was underextracted (procedural problem) and should be eliminated
Sample 21-1-10 (253 dbar) wasn't analyzed by us for helium
Sample17-2-15 (699 dbar) wasn't analyzed by us for helium
In short, the only one from the bunch that should be kept is 121-1-5 (110.8 dbar). I'm sorry that the other rubbish somehow got entrained in the file. I think it was one of my earlier submissions.
Replaced DELC13 decimal-1-data with decimal-2-data from same original data file.
Notes on P17C Mar, 5, 2003 D. Muus
1. Two C13 data files have been received:
1) /usr/export/html-public/data/onetime/pacific/p17/p17c/original/
2001.12.19_CFC_C13_MRG_P17C_SA/p17c.c13.dat
Received May 2001 from Bob Key ftp site.
2) /usr/export/html-public/data/onetime/pacific/p17/original/
20010206_C13_P17_STUART.email
Received Feb 6, 2002 from Dana Stuart
DELC13 agree within .01 /MILLE and flags agree. Used Bob Key's since
received later.
2. 1. Replaced 1-decimal-place DELC13 in p17chy.txt (20011029WHPOSIODM)
with 2-decimal-place DELC13 from:
/usr/export/html-public/data/onetime/pacific/p17/p17c/original/
2001.12.19_CFC_C13_MRG_P17C_SA/p17c.c13.dat
3. Both QUALT1 and QUALT2 set to QC value given in original data file.
4. C13ERR column was in web bottle with all missing value indicators.
No C13ERR data in C13 data files.
5. One sample in Stuart data file has 2 extra delc13 values.
STNNBR CASTNO SAMPNO DELC13 QF
42 1 7 0.63 2
42 1 7 0.70 2
First value for 42/1/7 is 0.67, QF=6, in both Key and Stuart Files.
6. Made new exchange file for Bottle data.
7. Checked new bottle file with Java Ocean Atlas.
Changed quality flags for Station 65 Samples 8-15 nitrite from 2 to 3 per Lynne Talley and Doug Masten. Changed all quality flag "1"s to "9"s. Put new woce and exchange format bottle files online.
Bottle NETCDF and inventory updated as well.
There were a lot of flow (bubble) problems for NO2 on this station. Coincidently (or not!), these problems started with sample #8 and continued through #15, which are the samples you have questioned. The analyst adjusted peaks and baselines at sea, but could EASILY be incorrect. It's hard to tell exactly what they 'should' be, but I would flag them questionable due to all the problems. There are no notes in the Quality file for these samples.
P17s Station 125:
This is easier. Sample #12 is higher than adjacent samples with the peak and baselines OK. Again, no notes in the Quality File; it could be real or possibly contaminated. I would leave it, as there are no analytical problems that stand out.
New PDF and text docs online.
New PDF doc online.
New PDF and text docs online.
Large Volume data samples were linked to website.
Converted lvs file P17CLV.data sent by Bob Key to WOCE format. Found in p17c/original/2000.01.12_P17C_C14_Key
I'm a bit confused and trying to figure things out here. I don't believe we reported a station 29 bottle 1 for P17c. We reported data for bottles 2,4,6,7,9,10,12 and 14 for that station. Same issue for station 41. We didn't analyze a bottle 3 there. We only reported data for bottles 2,4<=>16,18 and 19.
By the way, negative values for del3He are certainly valid, and should not be set to zero. Zero values for del3He may not necessarily mean a problem, but I'll go through the numbers you listed.
We took some copper tube samples from station 123 (bottles 2<=>17) on P17c. Although the samples were analyzed on the mass spectrometer, the results were not processed appropriately (they slipped through the net) yet somehow got included in the submission. The best thing to do here is to eliminate them for the atlas, and we'll see if we can recalculate them and resubmit them later.
Sample 121-1-8 (160.8 dbar) was underextracted (procedural problem) and should be eliminated.
Sample 121-1-5 (110.8 dbar) should be fine: the del3He = -0.004% (thus was rounding to zero for you)
Sample 116-1-4 (80.1 dbar) was not analyzed by us (I don't know how it got in the mix)
Sample 110-1-9 (212.2 dbar) was a failed analysis and should not have been reported
Sample 110-1-11 (310.3 dbar) was not analyzed by us for helium
Samples 80-1-X (82-150 dbar) were not analyzed by us for helium (I don't know why, but they weren't)
Sample 65-1-4 (73 dbar) wasn't analyzed by us for helium
Sample 65-1-13 (610 dbar) wasn't analyzed by us for helium
Sample 54-1-8 (241 dbar) was underextracted (procedural problem) and should be eliminated
Sample 48-1-7 (232 dbar) wasn't analyzed by us for helium
Sample 44-1-14 (601 dbar) was underextracted (procedural problem) and should be eliminated
Sample 33-1-11 (300 dbar) was underextracted (procedural problem) and should be eliminated
Sample 21-1-10 (253 dbar) wasn't analyzed by us for helium
Sample17-2-15 (699 dbar) wasn't analyzed by us for helium
In short, the only one from the bunch that should be kept is 121-1-5 (110.8 dbar). I'm sorry that the other rubbish somehow got entrained in the file. I think it was one of my earlier submissions.
Bottle: (theta, salnty, silcat, nitrat, nitrit, phspht, revprs, revtmp, delc14, c14err)
Converted LVS data sent by Bob Key to WOCE format. This file needs to be linked to the web page.
Copied QUALT1 flags to QUALT2 flags. Checked to make sure Q2 were compatible with Arnold Mantyla's Q2 flags. Found Talley and Tsuchiya's response to Mantylas DQ evaluation. Made changes to Q2 flags according to their response.
Merged CFC's from Wisegarver (July 9, 2001) file.
Merged DELC13 received from Key (May, 2001)
Some minor reformatting of the .sum file to make it compatiable with the accepted format.
Converted to exchange format using new program.
The new .sea, .sum, and exchange files put online.
Due to a flurry of messages, I have updated the CTD-Exchange file using the "Diggs" v1.0e ctd-to-exchange code followed by the rename_exctd.pl code. CTD-Exchange filenames *must* be in the standard form (p17c_XXSTN_XCAST_ct1.csv) for them to be zipped in the proper order. New file placed online and checked with JOA3.0 under Mac OSX1.1.
I have placed updated CFC data from Dave Wisegarver for P17C in the original subdirectory in a the directory called 2001.07.09_P17C_CFC_UPDT_WISEGARVER. notes, readme and data files are located in this directory. data are ready for merging.
CTD and Bottle files in exchange format have been put online.
It was brought to my attention that the WOCE Pacific/Indian He-Tr data was not as yet made public. After submitting it to you last year, I had intended on going through it one more time to ensure there were no problems with it. Unfortunately, I have not had the time to do this. Is it possible, therefore, to release it as public data, and if there are any subsequent minor revisions, to make changes? I suspect there might be a few samples in the set that might have got through our initial quality control.
Includes ODF report for legs 1-2, Appendices A-D, DQE reports for CTD and Hyd (with a response to hyd DQE), SVC14 & LVS final reports and data status notes.
2000.12.11 KJU
File contained here is a CRUISE SUMMARY and NOT sumfile. Documentation is online.
2000.10.11 KJU
Files were found in incoming directory under whp_reports. This directory was zipped, files were separated and placed under proper cruise. All of them are sum files.
Received 1997 August 15th.
Bottle: (tcarbn, alkali)
Merged TCARBN and ALKALI data into hyd file. Updated file is on line. Merging notes in original subdir 1998.03.04_P17C_CO2_XXX.
Bottle: (helium, delhe3)
Mergerd %deltaHe3 and molal[He] data into BTL file. Merging notes in original subdir 1999.10.08_P17C_HE_LUPTON-EVANS. NOTE: Merged over some existing (outdated) data at request of L. Evans (see notes in 00_README file). Outdated helium data saved in original directory as p17chy_rplcd_2000.08.31.txt.
2000.08.31 SRA
p17che_edt.dat: edited copy of p17woce.csv.txt. Replaced column delimiting ',' with spaces;
aligned columns for merging, replaced unreported data white space with
-9.0000 value for molal[He] on sta/cst/btl: 25/1/26;29/1/1,31,32;
41/1/27;44/1/36;61/1/30;65/1/18,23,33;69/1/19,28.
Runtime format: %delHe: a7,i6,a7,f10.2,i6 -->p17chy_delhe.dat
molal[He]: a7,i6,a7,16x,f11.4,i6 -->p17chy_delhe_he.dat
I transferred files over to the ftp-incoming directory the easy way (for me)... You will find the following "new" directories in /usr/export/ftp-incoming on whpo:
p16a_p17a
p17c_p17s_p16s
p17e_p19s
I already gave you p19c (which I see is in P19Cdoc). I thought it was redundant to put long names in every filename, so I made the directory name with the cruise lines, and the files are all the same. The figs files are all figxx.ps (where xx should indicate the figure numbers referenced in the documentation). I also included ps and ascii versions of the original documentation and applicable appendices. (appendix a and b will be missing - they are outdated now and shouldn't be included in anything.)
You may have tons of questions regarding the following. Hopefully I can answer most of them. I have tried to pare this listing down to a minimum at this point.
Attached are 5 ascii files and one pdf file for P17C LV (a.k.a.TUNES-1):
P17CLV.data - my version of the final data file with all qc flags (this file has a temperature flag (tf) and a pressure flag (pf). The appendix to this report contains all shipboard notes regarding sample collection, problems, etc.
P17CLV.sta - my version of the final LV station file
P17CLV.pdf - my final data report for P17C LV data
31WTTUNES1.ldo - original LV report produced by SIO (Sanborn)
31WTTUNES1.lsu - final version of p17c lv sum file
31WTTUNES1.lvs - initial version of p17c lv hyd file (no C14 prior to my QC, but close to WOCE format and with all times and locations)
AND
5 ascii files and 1 pdf file for P17C LV (a.k.a. TUNES-3). This cruise was run by WHOI with 1 SIO Tech aboard to help with LV work. As a result, no "official" hyd file was ever created. I got P,T,S data from SIO, nuts from OSU, C-14 from Stuiver and Ostlund.
31WTP17C.doc LV general info file from Talley
31WTP17C.ps Talley postscript cruise report for LV work
31WTP17.lvs original SIO P,T,S file
P16CLV.sta - my final version of the LV station file
P16CLV.data - my final version of the LV data file with C14, C13, nuts, and interpolated oxygen. I provided all final QC flags.
P16CLV.pdf - my final report for this leg. Appendix includes decklog notes, etc. This document failed to get an official OTL report number or data (I use 1/31/97).
cfc merging.
Changes made 29Nov1999 David Newton
p1716shy.txt
Fixed line length on headers. fixed QUALT2 on 2nd header
CFC11 and CFC12 merged in. No changes. File of new CFC's
contained 20 samples from STNNBR 999 which were not merged.
p17chy.txt
CFC11 and CFC12 merged in. No changes. File of new CFC's
contained 9 samples from STNNBR 999 which were not merged.
p17nhy.txt
changed expocode in p17nhy.txt from 325021/1 to 325021_1
CFC11 and CFC12 merged in. No changes.
File of new CFC's contained 8 stations (85 samples) that were
not in existing .SEA file. sta/cast were:
105/1 110/1 120/1 188/1 189/1 190/1 192/1 194/1
p19csu.txt
removed <cntrl-M> from end of each line.
p19chy.txt
CFC11 and CFC12 merged in. No changes.
p21ehy.txt
Changed FCO2 header to PCO2 .
CFC11 and CFC12 merged in. No changes.
file of new CFC's contained 8 stations (135 samples) that were
not in existing .SEA file. sta/cast were:
1/1 2/1 3/1 913/1 82/1 84/1 91/1 161/1
p06ehy.txt
CFC11 and CFC12 merged in. No changes.
file of new CFC's contained 3 stations (46 samples) that were
not in existing .SEA file. sta/cast were:
1/1 2/1 3/1
This is a follow-up to last month's message requesting that all of our Pacific and Indian Ocean CFCs be made accessible to the public. Our cruises are; (Pacific) P17C, P1716S, P06E, P19C, P17N, P21E, and (Indian) I09N, I05W/I04, I07N, I10.
P16s(31WTTUNES_2), p17c(31WTTUNES_1), and p19c(316N138_12) have all had cfc data from Rana Fine merged and updated into them. The tables and files have been updated to reflect this change. Data are public.
I received the CFC-11/12 datasets for the following WHP lines:
EXPOCODE 31WTTUNES/2 WHP-ID P17S,P16S
EXPOCODE 31WTTUNES/1 WHP-ID P17C
EXPOCODE 316N138/12 WHP-ID P19C
EXPOCODE 318MWEST_4_5 WHP-ID P21E/W
EXPOCODE 316N138/3 WHP-ID P6E
Each file looks fine and has been placed in the proper archived directory on our machine so that they can be merged in with the rest of the values.
-Steve Diggs
I just ftp'd our cfc files to the /INCOMING/RFine_cfcs directory. The files named *.sea are hydro files with our final cfc values and quality bytes merged in. The files named *_cfcs.dat are files that include station, cast, bottle, cfcs and quality bytes. Please let me know if you
have any problems and I'll let you know if we have any changes (hopefully not...).
I have provided hyd files for all these cruises, QC'ed by me, albeit not in WOCE format. I can resend if needed. Other than format, the only strange thing about these files was that I supplied a flag for revtmp, which I think appropriate given the number of things that can go wrong. Lynne may have these files reformatted since she has been using the results in the atlas prep.
BTL file complete except for CFC's and CTDoxy
Hi Terry. The next message (1000+ lines) contains the tritium-helium data for the TUNES 2 leg. Just to reiterate, this is the Thomas Washington cruise that took place in the summer of 1991, covering Pl7c-Pl6c along 135W and 150W respectively. The data are organized as one line per "sample", which may contain tritium, helium or both. -99 represents no data or sample for a variable. The columns are as follows:
Sta, Cast, Bottle, Pressure (db), tritium (TU), sigma-tritium (TU), delta-3He (permil), sigma-delta (permil), conc-Helium (nM/Kg), sigma-conc (nM/Kg), quall, qual2
The quality numbers for tritium (quall) are
1 = valid sample
2 = possible under-extraction
3 = possible contamination
7 = identity suspected
9 = no sample
In this data set, there were no quall values of 2,3 or 7
The quality numbers for helium (qual2) are
1 = valid sample
2 = possible under extraction
3 = possible (air) contamination
7 = identity suspected
9 = no sample
In this data set, there were no qual2 values of 7
Also, the obvious applies, if a sample value is null (-99) its error, which may not appear as null (-99) is meaningless.
Also, the tritium data has been corrected for a small (.0045 TU) blank due to cosmogenic production during storage.
Finally, I was hoping to finish up a paper that I am working on for this data: I don't mind you using it for demonstration purposes, but-I would hope that its distribution could be restricted over the next 4-5 months until I have had a chance to get it submitted and hopefully reviewed and accepted. Also, it will give me a chance to make one final pass at the data to ensure that there are no problems with it. I hope this is OK.