Files in the Dataset have been checked for format consistency, and merged into a single, integrated, downloadable file.
Download Entire Dataset Submit Data For This Cruise How to Cite DatasetCCHDO-1.0 CF netCDF files converted from bottle exchange file
CCHDO-1.0 CF netCDF files converted from ctd exchange file
2020-10-22
C Berys
Submissions
id date submit by file name --- ---------- --------- ------------
472 2015-04-23 p06c_hy1.csv
Conversions
file converted from software
-------------------- ------------------ -----------------
316N138_4_nc_hyd.zip 472_p06c_hy1.csv 0.8.2-61-g3353cfe
316N138_4_hy1.csv 316N200310_hy1.csv 0.8.2-61-g3353cfe
Updated Files Manifest
file stamp
-------------------- -----------------
316N138_4_nc_hyd.zip 20211022CCHSIORKP
316N138_4_hy1.csv 20211022CCHSIORKP
2020-10-22
C Berys
Submissions
id date submit by file name --- ---------- --------- ------------
472 2015-04-23 p06c_hy1.csv
Conversions
file converted from software
-------------------- ------------------ -----------------
316N138_4_nc_hyd.zip 472_p06c_hy1.csv 0.8.2-61-g3353cfe
316N138_4_hy1.csv 316N200310_hy1.csv 0.8.2-61-g3353cfe
Updated Files Manifest
file stamp
-------------------- -----------------
316N138_4_nc_hyd.zip 20211022CCHSIORKP
316N138_4_hy1.csv 20211022CCHSIORKP
2020-10-22
C Berys
Submissions
id date submit by file name --- ---------- --------- ------------
472 2015-04-23 p06c_hy1.csv
Conversions
file converted from software
-------------------- ------------------ -----------------
316N138_4_nc_hyd.zip 472_p06c_hy1.csv 0.8.2-61-g3353cfe
316N138_4_hy1.csv 316N200310_hy1.csv 0.8.2-61-g3353cfe
Updated Files Manifest
file stamp
-------------------- -----------------
316N138_4_nc_hyd.zip 20211025CCHSIORKP
316N138_4_hy1.csv 20211025CCHSIORKP
There is not enough information to know where this file should go in the timeline.
There is not enough information to know where this file should go in the timeline.
There is not enough information to know where this file should go in the timeline.
There is not enough information to know where this file should go in the timeline.
There is not enough information to know where this file should go in the timeline.
There is not enough information to know where this file should go in the timeline.
There is not enough information to know where this file should go in the timeline.
There is not enough information to know where this file should go in the timeline.
There is not enough information to know where this file should go in the timeline.
There is not enough information to know where this file should go in the timeline.
There is not enough information to know where this file should go in the timeline.
There is not enough information to know where this file should go in the timeline.
I dug out the original P6 data and can verify that the data on the WHPO website ARE in the stated units of micromoles per kilogram.
I pulled one station from each leg at random and in all cases, the phosphate, silicate, and nitrate concentations given in the WHPO site are approximately 97.56% of our original data. This is consistent with the conversion from micromoles per liter to micromoles per kilogram.
I am a PI of nutrients analysis on R/V Mirai BEAGLE cruise in 2003-2004 which revisited P06, A10, I03 and I04. I saw the temporal variation of nutrients on these regions, then I found a large decrease of nutrients concentration in the Pacific sector. It reminds me of a part of the cruise report as shown below.
I wonder that the concentration is stated in the unit of micro mol per kilogram in the data file. However, the data originator may have submitted in micro mol per liter and nobody converted them to micro mol per kilogram. If so, the big difference I found becomes relatively reasonable because P06 data becomes ca. 1/1.026.
Can you be track the nutrients data from the beginning? Do you have the paper version of data of P06? Or, would you let me know contact address of Dr. Joe Jennings who was a PI of nutrients data on P06?
Notes on P06C merging May 16, 2002 D. Muus
1. Merged Tritium from:
http://www.soc.soton.ac.uk/soes/staff/wjj/p06trits.txt
into current web bottle file (20010925WHPOSIODM).
2. QUALT2 same as QUALT1 for all merged values.
3. Changed NO2 Quality Codes per Joe Jennings Nov 1, 2001, message to Lou Gordon with Arnold Mantyla (DQE) comments.
Sta 101 Ca 1 Samples 12 through 5 (535.3-1107.9db) QCs 3 vs. 2
Sta 103 Ca 1 Samples 30 through 22 (258.4-759.9db) QCs 3 vs. 2
Sta 104 Ca 1 Samples 26 through 10 (458.0-2785.5db) QCs 3 vs. 2
Sta 150 Ca 1 Sample 24 (1011.4db) QCs 3 vs. 2
Sta 155 Ca 1 Sample 24 (1015.0db) QCs 3 vs. 2
Sta 156 Ca 1 Sample 24 (1200.2db) QCs 3 vs. 2
Sta 157 Ca 1 Sample 24 (1099.5db) QCs 3 vs. 2
Sta 158 Ca 1 Sample 24 (1303.1db) QCS 3 vs. 2
Sta 159 Ca 1 Sample 24 (1213.4db) QCs 3 vs. 2
Sta 167 Ca 1 Sample 24 (5866.6db) QCs 3 vs. 2
Sta 167 Ca 1 Samples 25, 23 & 22 (1013.2-1419.0db) QCs 3 vs. 2
4. Per Lynne Talley message of May 9, 2002, Subj: p6 helium.
HELIUM changed from 0.0000 to -9.0000,
DELHE3 changed from 0.00 to -999.00,
DELHER changed from .15 to -9.00 and
quality flags changed from 2 to 9 on following samples:
Sta Ca Samples
85 1 18
97 1 19
103 1 36
109 1 4, 3, & 2
115 1 36, 25, 24, 20, & 17
120 1 21 & 19
134 1 34 & 31
139 1 30 & 22
150 1 31 & 21
172 1 36, 34 & 32
176 1 23
186 1 36, 35, 34, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27 & 19
5. Made new exchange file for Bottle data.
6. Checked new bottle file with Java Ocean Atlas.
I'm looking at the data that is on the WHPO web site (at least a version of it that was on there earlier this year, please let me know if this is ok). I'm finding that there seems to be data in the file that actually shouldn't be there. I believe these were failed analyses that somehow got included in my data submission, whenever that was. For that, I apologize!
Fortunately, these spurious data points have a clear signature: they have a zero (and hence unphysical) helium concentration value. Thus any delhe3 would naturally be undefined anyway. You can eliminate these points by selecting only those delhe3 values that have non-zero helium.
Unfortunately, there is a bunch of them (45 to be exact). Below is a list of the spurious points :
STNNBR CASTNO SAMPNO CTDPRS HELIUM DELHE3 NEON
35 1 27 307.5 0 0 -999
45 1 27 258.7 0 0 -999
45 1 16 1112.4 0 0 -999
49 1 28 254.1 0 0 -999
53 1 20 800.4 0 0 -999
59 1 21 652.8 0 0 -999
85 1 18 1063.9 0 0 -999
97 1 19 1614.6 0 0 -999
103 1 36 18.7 0 0 -999
109 1 4 1515.1 0 0 -999
109 1 3 1713.2 0 0 -999
109 1 2 1904.2 0 0 -999
115 1 36 23.6 0 0 -999
115 1 25 712.9 0 0 -999
115 1 24 812.1 0 0 -999
115 1 20 1217 0 0 -999
115 1 17 1615.6 0 0 -999
120 1 21 1192.7 0 0 -999
120 1 19 1581.2 0 0 -999
134 1 34 112.3 0 0 -999
134 1 31 262.6 0 0 7.664
139 1 30 318.1 0 0 -999
139 1 22 1216 0 0 -999
150 1 31 318.5 0 0 -999
150 1 21 1416.6 0 0 -999
172 1 36 21.4 0 0 -999
172 1 34 109 0 0 -999
172 1 32 305.2 0 0 -999
176 1 23 1514.6 0 0 -999
186 1 36 19.1 0 0 -999
186 1 35 59.3 0 0 -999
186 1 34 109.7 0 0 -999
186 1 32 207.4 0 0 -999
186 1 31 302.4 0 0 -999
186 1 30 400.1 0 0 -999
186 1 29 501 0 0 -999
186 1 28 601.9 0 0 -999
186 1 27 702.6 0 0 -999
186 1 19 1506 0 0 -999
209 1 8 297.5 0 0 -999
227 1 22 794.6 0 0 -999
234 1 35 27.9 0 0 -999
237 1 29 502.1 0 0 -999
237 1 16 1803.4 0 0 -999
240 1 23 783.2 0 0 -99
The documentation file on P06C DQEd CFC data was submitted separately and later than the actual data. Data has already been merged by D. Muus. However DQE comments file was now moved to the P06C directory containing the CFC data submitted by Wisegarver on 2001.07.09
..../pacific/p06/p06c/original/20010709_CFC_WISEGARVER_P06C
created .ps files, check with gs viewer. Created *check.txt file.
CTD has been converted to exchange using the new code and put online.
I pulled the stripcharts for the P6 stations that Lynne had questions about. We did, indeed, have some problems with wandering baselines at a few stations and what appears to be a consistent leaking bottle at several others. The apparently leaking Niskin #24 was located at a depth at which there was a strong gradient in the other nutrients, so the leak is not readily apparent except as a persistent small nitrite peak at ca 1000 - 1200 db.
Station(s) Problem
101, 103, 104 Non-linear baseline meander
150, 154 - 159 Small real NO2 peak, always at Niskin 24 at 1000 - 1200 db (36 bottle rosette)
167 Bottle 24 definitely a leaker. Other nitrite values from bottles 22 - 36 affected by a baseline meander.
193 This high nitrite was due to a fluke computer problem. The value should be 0.003 vs 0.32. (Don't know if it's better to flag or change this datum.)
I would agree with Lynne that she should "zero them out" for the purposes of her plot(s), and we should ask her to flag them in the WHPO data set.
Documentation for this cruise has been updated.
Notes on P06C CFC merging Sept 25, 2001. D. Muus
1. New CFC-11 and CFC-12 from:
/usr/export/html-public/data/onetime/pacific/p06/p06c/original/
20010709_CFC_WISEGARVER_P06C/20010709.185231_WISEGARVER_P06C_p06c_CFC_DQE.dat
merged into SEA file taken from web Aug 20, 2001
(20010326WHPOSIOKJU)
All "1"s in QUALT1 changed to "9"s and QUALT2 replaced by new QUALT1 prior to merging. DQE recommendatations for Bottle, Salts, Oxygen and Nutrient appear to have been made to QUALT1 word. Web QUALT2 word has many "1"s including BTLNBR QUALT2 code.
2 SUM file: Changed Sta 91 Cast 1 BO Longitude from 122 59.85 to 123 59.85. 165 BO Latitude from 32 39.35 to 32 29.35.
Per Jane Dunworth-Baker message of August 29, 2001.
Removed "^Z" from end of file.
3. Exchange file checked using Java Ocean Atlas.
*****
Notes on P06E CFC merging Sept 25, 2001. D. Muus
1. New CFC-11 and CFC-12 from:
/usr/export/html-public/data/onetime/pacific/p06/p06e/original/
20010709_CFC_WISEGARVER_P06E/20010709.185349_WISEGARVER_P06E_p06e_CFC_DQE.dat
merged into SEA file taken from web Aug 20, 2001
(20001024WHPOSIOSRA)
All "1"s in QUALT1 changed to "9"s and QUALT2 replaced by new QUALT1 prior to merging. DQE recommendatations for Bottle, Salts, Oxygen and Nutrient appear to have been made to QUALT1 word. Web QUALT2 word has many "1"s including BTLNBR QUALT2 code.
2 SUM file: Changed Station 7 Cast 1 BO Longitude from 71 01.22 to 72 01.22. 32 BE Longitude from 86 19.73 to 86 00.00.
32 BO Longitude from 86 33.00 to 86 00.00.
55 BE Latitude from 101 30.11 to 101 20.11.
Per Jane Dunworth-Baker message of August 29, 2001.
Removed "^M"s from end of .SUM file lines. Removed "^Z" from end of .SUM file..
3. Exchange file checked using Java Ocean Atlas.
*****
Notes on P06W CFC merging Sept 24, 2001. D. Muus
1. New CFC-11 and CFC-12 from:
/usr/export/html-public/data/onetime/pacific/p06/p06w/original/
20010709_CFC_WISEGARVER_P06W/20010709.170933_WISEGARVER_P06W_p06w_CFC_DQE.dat
merged into SEA file taken from web Aug 20, 2001
(20010326WHPOSIOKJU)
All "1"s in QUALT1 changed to "9"s and QUALT2 replaced by new QUALT1 prior to merging. DQE recommendatations for Bottle, Salts, Oxygen and Nutrient appear to have been made to QUALT1 word. Web QUALT2 word has many "1"s including BTLNBR QUALT2 code.
2 SUM file: Removed "^M"s from end of lines. Removed "^Z"from end of file.
Moved "LATITUDE" and "LONGITUDE" headers to be left justified with data.
3. Exchange file checked using Java Ocean Atlas.
I just 'put' p6c.tar.Z and p6w.tar.Z in the INCOMING directory at whpo.ucsd.edu.
I was looking at Jane Dunworth-Baker's Aug 29, 2001, message and her comment "sta 156 salt at 3db should be 35.5652" appears to be referring to CTD data not Bottle data.
The shallowest bottle on 156 is 23.7db. CTD salt at 3db is now 38.5652.
So this will be a correction not connected with the anticipated CFC merging.
CTD and Bottle files in exchange format have been put online.
STUART, DANA would like the data PUBLIC.
Sorry about excluding the headers... should have included them in the body of the last message. Here they are:
Lab ID (WHOI NOSAMS = 1, U-Wash/Quay = 3
WOCE line/WHPID
Station
Cast
Niskin
del-C13 value
del-C13 Quality Flag
Please also note for those P6 files that the default value is -9, for those which do not have a REAL C13 value.
2000.11.27 KJU
File contained here is a CRUISE SUMMARY and NOT sumfile. Documentation is online.
2000.10.11 KJU
Files were found in incoming directory under whp_reports. This directory was zipped, files were separated and placed under proper cruise. All of them are sum files.
Received 1997 August 15th.
Merged PCO2TMP data from A. KOZYR into hyd file. Updated hyd file is on-line.
Bottle: (tcarbn, pco2)
Merged TCARBN and PCO2 from A. Kozyr. Updated hyd file is on line. Merging notes in original subdir 2000.08.24_P06_CO2_KOZYR.
A. Kozyr data for p06c, p06w, p06e were placed together in the original subdir
2000.08.24_P06_ALL_LEGS_CO2_KOZY. Copied each data set to related p06 subdir for
merging.
Specific notes for merging TCARBN and PCO2 on p06c: After merging data, noticed missing data was in format -9.0. Extracted TCARBN and PCO2 data columns and substituted -9.0 with -999.0 (seemed more appropriate). Remerged.
I have moved all three legs of P06 CO2 data into the parent P06 original directory. Data (TCARBN, and PC02, PCO2TEMP) were sent by Alex Kozyr on 2000.08.24. Email accompanies data in /onetime/p06/original/2000.08.24_P06_ALL_LEGS_CO2_KOZYR. Data are public and have not yet been merged. "to merge" table has been updated to reflect this.
Bottle: (delc14, c14err)
Merged C14 data into hyd file. Merging notes in subdir original/2000.05.10_P06_C14_KEY. Updated hyd file is on-line.
All C14 data/notes for P06 legs p06c, p06e, p06w came in one dir. from Bob Key (2000.05.10_P06_All_LEGS_C14_KEY).This data dir. was copied to each cruise leg subdir. The edited data file, p06_c14_edt.dat, was reformatted and prepared for merging, then copied into each cruise subdir. NOTE: One entry in this file was erroneous. The entry had a station value of b2532. I reviewed the bottle data file and determined this was meant to be station 32, cast 1, sample 25; edited this entry for merging. Also, the Key data file header reports the file format is station, cast, bottle....; This format does not match the bottle file format. C14 data was merged as station, cast, sample....
I have put the long waited and finally released by Doug Wallace final CO2-related data files for the Pacific Ocean WOCE Sections P6E, P6C, and P6W to the WHPO ftp INCOMING area.
The C-14 section captures most of the features for P6, however, I think that you only have about half the data. The details of how this could happen are too long to worry about, but it is probably my fault. I have attached an ascii file with all of the results.
One problem is that the current hydro file at WHPO does not include data for station 3. Early versions of the sea file included stations 1-3, but these locations were re-sampled and subsequently 1-3 declared "test". As early as 1995 I lobbied to get station 3 data added back into the official files, and it was for awhile. When the far eastern portion of the secion was re-sampled, some of the tracers which had been sampled originally were not re-collected. The reasons varied. With respect to C-14, cutting station 3 is equivalent to discarding ~10K worth of analyses and it creates a very important hole in the section. The problem is less severe (due to sampling density) for carbon parameters, but it exists. I do not know the whether or not H-3 was collected on any of station 1-3.
I found no glaring problems with the bottle data from station 3 and think that the C-14 data alone justifies keeping this station in the official WOCE data file.
When the section is remade, it is important that the contour labels be attached to the C-14 minimum around 2300m at the eastern end of the section. The fact that the minimum is segregated into eastern and western lobes is one of the most important results from the deep Pacific radiocarbon program. I also believe that the deep/abyssal relative max around 102W is real and probably indicative of a weak western boundary flow along the flank of the ridge.
WHPO: I have ftp'ed a copy of the attached file to your INCOMING directory
called P6-C-14.dat
Only 111 stations reported in summary file, bottle file, ctd stations. Station numbers in above range from 75 to 188 so you might imagine 114 stations occupied. (Cruise report says 113 but this is obvious error of counting). However stations 112,141,187 have been discarded - hence
number is 111 as all files agree. So perhaps you might change 133 to 111.
My name is Danie Bartolacci, and I'm a programmer/analyst working for both theWHPO and Lynne Talley. I'm trying to track down information about C-13 measurements taken for some WOCE Pacific lines. I've recently corresponded with Bob Key who directed me to you.
My understanding from Bob is that processing of C-13 for these lines is finished. Is it possible to obtain the data and/or an update on their status for the following cruise lines? Any information you can provide would be greatly appreciated! Thank you for your time!
P16N- McNichol
P17C- McNichol
P16S17S- McNichol
P16C- Quay
P14C- McNichol
P6E,C,W- McNichol
P16A17A- McNichol
P17E19S- McNichol/Rau
P19C- McNichol/Rau
P10- McNichol
P17N- Quay/McNichol
P13- Quay/McNichol
P18- Quay/McNichol
P14S15S- Quay
S04P- McNichol
My policy has been to get any data I have to WHP within 1wk of receiving the preliminary data report from NOSAMS. This includes Quay and Schlosser data as well. According to my records:
Public:
All of P6 (E,C,W)