                                                                   If symbols do not display correctly 
                                                                          set your browser's character  
                                                                                   encoding to unicode 





A.   Cruise Report: P06E • P06C • P06W
     Pacific Zonal Section at 32°S 
     (updated SEP 2011)



A.1. Highlights
    
                               WHP CRUISE SUMMARY INFORMATION

WOCE Section Designation | P06W (Leg5)               P06C (Leg4)               P06E (Leg3)           
  Expedition Designation | 316N138_5                 316N138_4                 316N138_3             
        Chief Scientists | J. TOOLE/WHOI             M. MCCARTNEY/WHOI         BRYDEN/JRC            
                   Dates | 13 JUL 1992-30 JUL 1992   30 MAY 1992-07 JUL 1992   02 MAY 1992-26 MAY 1992  
                    Ship | R/V Knorr                                                                    
           Ports of Call | Auckland to               Easter Island to          Valparaiso to         
                         | Sydney, AUS               Auckland, NZ              Easter Island         
      Number of Stations | 78 CTD/rosette            111 CTD/rosette           68 CTD/rosette        
                         |                                                                  
                         |         30°4'S                     31°5'S                    32°3'S      
   Geographic Boundaries | 153°29'E      177°32'E     177°32'W      113°20'E     112°40'W      71°30'W 
                         |         31°5'S                     32°3'S                    32°3'S      
                         |
       Floats & Drifters | 18 ALACE floats deployed
                Moorings | none
    Contributing Authors | John Toole,    Charles Corry,     Margaret Cook,  George Knapp
                         | Joe Jennings,  Sarah Zimmermann,  Arnold Mantyla
                         

                                  CHIEF SCIENTIST CONTACT INFORMATION

 HARRY BRYDEN, LEG 3                       MIKE McCARTNEY, LEG 4            JOHN TOOLE, LEG 5
 James Rennell Centre for Ocean Research   Dept. of Physical Oceanography   Dept. of Physical Oceanography
 Chilworth Research Centre • Gamma House   Woods Hole Oceanographic Inst.   Woods Hole Oceanographic Inst.
 Chilworth, Southampton SO1 7NS            Woods Hole  MA  02543            Woods Hole  MA  02543  
 United Kingdom                            USA                              USA
 Phone: +44-703-766184                     Phone: 508-457-2000 ext. 2797    Phone: 508-457-2000 ext. 2531
 Fax:   +44-703-767507                     Fax:   508-457-2181              Fax:   508-457-2181
 Email: hlb@nso.ac.uk                      Email: mmccartney@whoi.edu       Email: jtoole@whoi.edu



TABLE OF CONTENTS

A.     Cruise narrative
A.1.   Highlights
       WOCE designation
       Expedition designation
       Chief scientist
       Ship
       Ports of call
       Cruise dates
A.2.   Cruise Summary Information
A.2.a. Geographic boundaries
A.2.b. Stations occupied
A.2.c. Floats and drifters deployed
A.2.d. Moorings deployed or recovered
A.3.   List of Principal Investigators
A.4.   Scientific Programme and Methods
A.4.1  Leg 5 Overview
A.5.   Major Problems and Goals Not Achieved
A.6.   Other Incidents of Note
A.7.   List of Cruise Participants
B.     Underway Measurements
B.1.   Navigation and bathymetry
B.2.   Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP)
B.3.   Thermosalinograph and underway dissolved gasses
B.4.   Expendable bathythermograph and salinity measurements
B.5.   Meteorological observations
C.     Hydrographic Measurements
C.1.   General Information
C.2.   Water sample salinity and oxygen data
C.3.   Water sample nutrient data
C.4.   CTD/O2 data
C.5.   Final Report for AMS 14-C Samples
C.6.   Station Log
D.     Acknowledgements
E.     References
F.     WHPO Summary
G.     Data Quality Evaluations
G.1.   DQE of WOCE P06C Hydrographic Data
G.2.   DQE of WOCE P06E Hydrographic Data
G.3.   DQE of WOCE P06W Hydrographic Data
G.4.   DQE of WOCE P06 CFC Data
G.5.   DQE of WOCE P06 CTD Data
G.6.   PI Response to Hydrographic DQE
G.7.   PI Response to CTD DQE
H.     Notes on the KNORR analytical lab
APPENDICES
  Appendix A: Station positions and summary (see data files)
  Appendix B: Comments regarding CTD data acquisition
  Appendix C  Summary of fits to the CTD laboratory pressure data
  Appendix D: Summary of fits to the CTD laboratory temperature data
  Appendix E: Summary of fits to the CTD conductivity laboratory data
  Appendix F: CTD conductivity fitting applied to the final data
  Appendix G: Fits for CTD oxygen
  Appendix H: CTD processing: Station by station 
WOCE Data Processing Notes

(ALL FIGURES ARE AVAILABLE IN THE PDF VERSION OF THIS REPORT)



A.2.   CRUISE SUMMARY INFORMATION

A.2.a. Geographic boundaries: 

Leg 3 (E) occupied stations along 32°30'S from 71°30'W to 112°40'W. 
Leg 4 (C) continued along 32°30'S from 112°40'W to 178°55'E at station 184. After  
          station 184 the section was angled northward, and Leg 4 finished up at 
          31°5'S, 177°32.30'E. 
Leg 5 (w) picked up where Leg 4 ended and continued the line northward to 30°5'S, 
          176°30'E. From 176°30'E the section continued along 30°5'S to the 
          Australian coast, finishing at 153°29'E.

A.2.b. Stations occupied: 

Leg3:  68 CTD/rosette
Leg4:  111 CTD/rosette
Leg5:  78 CTD/rosette

A trackline of P06 (containing all three legs) is shown in Figure 1. The bottle 
depth diagram is shown in Figure 2.

A.2.c. Floats and drifters deployed:  

Eighteen ALACE floats were deployed along section P06.

A.2.d. Moorings deployed or recovered: 

No moorings were deployed or recovered during this cruise, but moored current 
meter measurements were being maintained in the East Australian Current and the 
Deep Western Boundary Current east of the Tonga Kermadec Ridge at the time of 
our cruise.



A.3.  List of Principal Investigators


TABLE 1:  List of Principle Investigators and Measurements on all 3 legs

Measurement               Principal Investigator  Institution
------------------------  ----------------------  -----------
Salinity, oxygen, CTD/O2  John Toole              WHOI
Nutrients                 Lou Gordon              OSU
Chlorofluorocarbons       Ray Weiss               SIO
Helium/tritium            Bill Jenkins            WHOI
AMS C-14                  Bob Key                 Princeton
TCO2                      Doug Wallace            Brookhaven
Transmissometer           Wilf Gardner            TAMU
Underway fluorometer      John Marra              LDEO
Meteorology (IMET)        Barrie Walden           WHOI
Air chemistry             Ray Weiss               SIO
ADCP                      Mike Kosro              OSU
Bathymetry                John Toole              WHOI
ALACE floats              Russ Davis              SIO
Drifters                  Peter Niiler            SIO
Surface Ra-228            Bob Key                 Princeton
Thermosalinograph         Bob Millard             WHOI


TABLE 2: list of Institutions

Abbreviation   Institution Name and Address
-------------  ---------------------------------------
NOAA/PMEL      NOAA
               Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory
               7600 Sand Point Way NE
               Seattle, WA
               98115-0700

SIO            Scripps Institution of Oceanography
               University of California of San Diego
               9500 Gilman Drive
               La Jolla, CA
               92093

U. Hawaii      University of Hawaii
               1000 Pope Rd
               Honolulu, HI
               96822

TAMU           Texas A&M University
               Department of Oceanography
               College Station, TX
               77843

OSU            Oregon State University
               Corvallis, OR

WHOI           Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute
               Woods Hole, Ma
               02543

Princeton      Princeton University
               Princeton, NJ
               08540

LDEO           Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
               Columbia University
               Palisades, NY  
               10964

U. Washington  University of Washington
               School of Oceanography
               Seattle, WA
               98195





A.4.  SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMME AND METHODS
      (by John Toole - November 1994)

WHP P06 was carried out from the R/V Knorr in May-July 1992. This quasi-zonal 
section spanned the subtropical South Pacific Ocean at 30°S 32°30'S. As such, it 
was defined as the WOCE Heat Flux line for this ocean basin. In addition to the 
hydrographic section, moored current meter measurements were being maintained in 
the East Australian Current and the Deep Western Boundary Current east of the 
Tonga Kermadec Ridge at the time of our cruise.

P06 represented the first WHP leg aboard the recently re-engined and jumbo-ized 
R/V Knorr. Perhaps not unexpectedly, numerous start-up problems were experienced 
on P06, as problems with the vessel's systems became apparent. Frequent power 
black-outs were experienced, as well as more subtle instrument problems related 
to the line voltage. Complicating matters, the break-down of the facility at 
Easter Island meant that no fuel was available at Easter Island. Extreme 
conservation requirements dictated reduced ship speed for the first two legs of 
the program. CTD's and water sample rosettes also presented their share of 
problems during the expedition. Significant credit must be given to the Knorr's 
personnel, and the seagoing scientific teams for carrying on with the work 
despite the difficulties.

The expedition was broken into three legs. Leg3, with Harry Bryden as chief 
scientist (Knorr cruise 138 leg3), departed Valparaiso, Chile on May 2 and 
occupied 72 stations, 68 of which were along 32°30'S working west from the South 
American Coast to 109 20 W. On May 24, work was suspended and the Knorr 
transited north to Easter Island for a personnel change. Leg4 (Mike McCartney, 
chief scientist) departed Easter Island on May 30 and resumed station work on 
the 32°30'S line at 109°20'W on June 1st. This, the longest of the three legs, 
experienced the worst weather and the most problems with instrumentation. 
Nevertheless, a total of 113 stations were successfully occupied on the leg, 
extending the section across the Tonga-Kermadec Ridge to 177°32'E. Work was 
completed on July 4th, whereupon the Knorr transited to Auckland, New Zealand 
for supplies and another personnel change. The third leg, with John Toole as 
chief scientist, departed Auckland on July 13 and resumed station work with a 
reoccupation of the last station taken on Leg4. The ship track was subsequently 
angled northwest to 30°S and then extended west to the Australian coast at that 
latitude. The section was completed with a station on the Australian shelf on 
July 25. Having some extra time at the end of the main section occupation, two 
repeats of the western most 100 km of the line (that bit across the East 
Australian Current) were made. The Knorr then headed for port, arriving in 
Sydney on July 30.

Primary responsibility for the basic hydrographic observations fell to the Woods 
Hole Oceanographic Institution's CTD/Hydrography Group. They were responsible 
for acquiring temperature, salinity and dissolved oxygen data, and coordinating 
with other groups analyzing dissolved nutrients and tracer concentrations. This 
report documents the measurement systems, analysis/processing techniques, 
uncertainties and residual problems with the reduced data set. Separate sections 
are included from each of the major groups on the cruise. Specifically, this 
submission to the WHPO encompasses the CTD observations, water sample salinity, 
oxygen, nutrients, and underway bathymetry. Underway meteorological measurements 
have earlier been submitted to the NCAR data center. Access to those 
measurements is described below. A separate document will be submitted by Kevin 
Maillet (RSMAS) on the CFC program.

During the three-leg expedition, a number of test stations were carried out to 
assess instrument performance and/or inter-comparability of data. Those are not 
reported here. In the majority of cases, these test stations were duplicates of 
stations along the main section line that are reported here, but with different 
CTD instruments. Thus, technically according to WHP guidelines, they should have 
been labeled as different casts not different stations. In this group are 
Stations 73 (CTD No.7) and 74 (CTD No.9), collocated with station 72, 141 (CTD 
No.9 collocated with station 142), 187 and 189 (CTD No.9, collocated with stations 
188 and 190) and 247, (repeat of sta 233 for additional CO2 sampling) (CTD No.9, 
collocated with station 248). Stations 1, 2 and 3 were made with different CTD 
instruments at the start of the cruise to assess instrument performance and 
allow specification of the primary for the cruise. They were not along the main 
section line and so are not reported here. Thus the P06 line begins in the east 
with Station 4. Station 112 with CTD 9 experienced significant instrumentation 
failures making the acquired data of very questionable accuracy. It was deemed 
unrecoverable during processing.

The western most station of the main P06 line was number 246. In addition to the 
main occupation, two repeat sections were made across the East Australian 
Current of stations 237- 246. They consist of stations 248-257 and 258-267. 
Primary attention was paid in the post-cruise calibration of these stations to 
the CTD salinity data; the CTD oxygen data were not scrutinized to the same 
degree as the data along the main line.


A.4.1.  Leg 5 Overview
        (Toole, chief scientist)

R/V Knorr cruise 138 - Leg 5 is the third and final segment of the transpacific 
WOCE Hydrographic Program section P06.  Segments 1 and 2 obtained measurements 
along latitude 32°30'S between South America and the Tonga-Kermadec Ridge 
(approximately at the date line).  Our segment was planned to extend the 
measurements to the Australian coast. The selection of 32°30'S for P06 Segments 
1 and 2 was dictated by the WOCE deep western boundary current meter array 
deployed at this latitude east of the Kermadec Ridge; stations were obtained 
between each current meter mooring of the array.  A second WOCE moored array, 
this one off the Australian coast just poleward of 30°S, was deployed by CSIRO 
(Australia) investigators to measure the East Australian Current (EAC).  
Sampling on Segment 3 was designed to survey along this array.  Thus, the P06 
sampling plan called for a northward deflection of the cruise track from 32°30'S 
to 32°05'S.  This was planned for the longitude range  179 - 176 30'E, within 
the South Fiji Basin.

The sampling plan for P06 called for an average station separation of 30 NM, 
with tighter spacing where the bathymetry changed rapidly.  A total of about 50 
stations was envisioned for Segment 3. Casts were to be done using the Scripps 
ODF 36-position x 10-liter rosette system and CTD instrumentation from the WHOI 
Group.  Water samples were to be spaced no greater than 200 m in the vertical.  
The WHOI Hydrographic Group was responsible for analyzing water samples for 
salinity and dissolved oxygen; sampling for tritium and helium was planned for 
subsequent shoreside analysis in the WHOI facility. Both groups were to utilize 
their self-contained portable laboratories. The OSU group was tasked with 
analyzing water samples for dissolved nutrient concentration.  These activities 
were planned for the climate-controlled laboratory aboard the Knorr.  The P06 CFC 
sampling was divided up by several U.S. investigators working in collaboration. 
Collection of samples for C-14 analysis were planned for the Princeton and 
Australian groups.  In addition, a CO2 program was planned in association with 
JGOFS.  M. Kosro undertook responsibility for underway ocean velocity 
measurements using an Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP).  Complementing 
these observations were a number of meteorological and ocean surface 
measurements planned from the vessel. Finally, deployment of WOCE ALACE floats 
along the cruise track was scheduled roughly every 2.5 degrees of longitude.

If additional time was available after the completion of the primary sampling 
line, repeated sampling of the EAC was planned to better define the boundary 
current transport at the time of the section.  What was envisioned were repeats 
of the last 100-150 km of the P06 section in combination with a series of ADCP 
transects.  
 

CRUISE PERSONNEL

The major groups involved in WHP observation program were the 
CTD/Hydrography/nutrient team, the CFC group, a transient tracer contingent, and 
an underway sampling group.  The leg had a true international feel as the 
science party included folks from CSIRO Australia, led by my co-investigator 
John Church, and a NZOI, New Zealand scientist.  As in the case of the first two 
legs, a CO2 program was aboard under the direction of the Brookhaven National 
Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY.  The CO2 group consisted of two BNL employees (K. 
M. Johnson and V. Coles) and an Australian scientist, B. Tilbrook, of CSIRO.


CRUISE NARRATIVE

Staging for Kn 138-5 was minimal as all equipment was in use on the preceding 
two legs.  The Knorr arrived in Auckland on July 6, one day ahead of schedule.  
On the 7th, a small group met to debrief the previous leg participants and 
clarify cruise-specific procedures. Cruise Leg 4 had achieved its planned 
sampling to 177°30'E; no extra station work was therefore required of Leg 5.  
One of the WHOI salinometers had developed an intermittent fault during Leg 4; a 
back-up instrument was air shipped to Auckland as replacement.  As well, the 
phosphate channel of the nutrient autoanalyzer failed on the preceding leg (and 
its back-up).  Spare parts for this instrument also met the ship in Auckland.

Poor quality ship electrical power was implicated in both of these failures, but 
not conclusively demonstrated.  In any event, a harmonic filter, a replacement 
for the original unit which had failed on Leg 1 (?), was delivered to the Knorr 
in Auckland and installed on the "clean power" supply.  Also, additional 
components were fitted to the controller of the Markey winch while in port.  
This unit was serviceable on the preceding leg, but because of poor slow-speed 
control (resulting in rough recoveries of the CTD package back on deck) was not 
employed regularly.  The winch used as primary on the preceding leg (the Almon-
Johnson) required manual application of a brake when stopping to acquire water 
samples.  It was my understanding that repair components for the Almon-Johnson 
brake were also to be installed in Auckland, but that turned out not to be the 
case.

In mid-week, when most of the scientific party had yet to arrive, it was 
discovered that the software licenses for the WHOI CTD Group data acquisition 
and processing computers had expired.  Renewal is usually carried out under 
contract with WHOI's computer support facility.  In this case, the stand-alone 
operating systems on the sea-going computers had been generated just prior to 
updating the WHOI-wide licenses.  In this state, data acquisition software would 
not work, and the systems were next to useless.  Thanks to long hours by Ellyn 
Montgomery (the CTD Data Manager for Leg 5) and Tom Bolmer back at WHOI, the 
problem was identified and solved, leaving the chief scientist slightly frazzled 
but in business.

At 0800 on our scheduled departure date of July 13 the Knorr moved to the fuel 
pier and commenced bunkering.  At 1600 we departed Auckland and headed north to 
our first station.  The ship track for Kn 138 Legs 3,4,5 is presented in figure 
1.  The transit out from New Zealand was a bit rough (particularly for just 
starting out) but not bad.  We held a cruise meeting with the science party on 
the 14th while in transit, and assigned watches (Attachment A).  

We arrived at the first work site (31°5'S  177°32'E) on July 14 at 2000Z, where 
Leg 4 investigators completed their work with lowerings of the primary (Sta.  
188) and principle back-up (Sta. 189) CTD instruments.  We began by doing the 
same; Sta. 189 was with the back-up (CTD #9), Sta 190 with the primary (CTD 
#10.)  Potential temperature-salinity curves for the deep water from Stas. 187-
190 show both primary and back-up CTDs did not change calibration during the 
Auckland port stop.  Furthermore, examination of the deep temperature records 
from CTD #10 and the secondary temperature sensor integrated into the instrument 
(a stand- alone platinum thermometer) showed the temperature calibration of 
instrument 10 remained stable during the repair work conduced during Leg 4.  
(The temperature difference between the two sensors changed less than 0.5°C, 
essentially un-measurable.)

Station work then proceeded west as planned, pretty much uneventfully.  At the 
request of ship's personnel, we moved operations to the Markey winch.  With its 
repaired controller, the winch performed acceptably.  On Sta. 201, the CTD 
package was inadvertently lowered into the bottom at full lowering speed (60 
m/min).  The shock broke the mounting brackets holding the CTD in the underwater 
package, but the unit was recovered.  On Sta. 213 the underwater package struck 
the ship's bulwark on deployment rather severely.  Comparison of the two 
temperature records showed no change in temperature difference resulting from 
these impacts.  As it is unlikely that both sensors would shift the same amount, 
we conclude the shock of hitting the bottom and the ship did not measurably 
change the temperature calibration.  A small shift of the conductivity channel 
did result from the bottom contact, however (but is correctable using the 
salinity water samples).

Much of Leg 5 crossed shallow bathymetric features.  Over these features, water 
sampling was reduced to 24 or at times fewer bottles (but still retaining 
minimum 200 m vertical resolution).  Watch standing duties were much reduced at 
these times as the ODF rosette did not have to be disassembled and reassembled 
at each cast.  

On Sta. 215 a bearing failed in one of the turning sheeves used to fairlead the 
wire overboard from the Markey winch.  The cast was recovered successfully and 
operations shifted back over to the Almon Johnson winch (requiring a second hand 
to operate the brake.)  Ship's personnel were unable to locate a replacement 
bearing, effectively putting the Markey winch out of operation after about 30 
lowerings. The station work was successfully completed using the Almon-Johnson 
winch with manual braking.  In general, both winches, when operable, performed 
well: level winding properly, raising and lowering the CTD/rosette as fast as 
the package size allowed. 

ALACE deployments occurred at regular intervals during the cruise.  Peter 
Landry, (CTD Technician for the leg) took responsibility for assembling and 
checking out the units.  Deployments were uniformly uneventful.  

At longitude 159°E the cruise track was diverted south 15 miles to avoid the 
Elizabeth Reef.  Sta. 226, the only site off the 30°5'S line west of 176°E was 
taken at 30°20'S 159°5'E.

At longitude 156°30'E, two CTD casts were made (denoted Stas. 233,234).  The 
second cast provided water for an inter-comparison of small volume C-14 
facilities (U.S. and Australia).  Bronte Tilbrook is the point of contact for 
this study.  Several in the scientific party and crew took advantage of the good 
weather and time between casts (when samples were being drawn) for a quick swim 
call.

Approaching the Australian coast, station spacing was reduced to as little as 5 
NM crossing the East Australian Current.  The bottom profile approaching the 
continental shelf at latitude 30°5'S is quite complicated, with very steep 
sections.  Station positions were adjusted in an attempt to sample between each 
current mooring of the EAC array, while avoiding large cast to cast changes in 
bottom depth.  Turn-around time between stations was lengthened at this time to 
allow those running water samples aboard ship to keep up.   Sta. 246, marking 
the end of the P06 section, was occupied on July 25 in 90 m of water on the 
Australian shelf.

Upon completion of the primary section, the ship reversed course and returned to 
position 30°5'S  155°E, site of Sta. 237.  The run east provided a synoptic 
map of the EAC current field using the ship mounted ADCP system.  Having the 
time, we proceeded to make two repeat sections across the EAC using a small (24 
position x 1.2 liter) rosette system.  Installation of the CTD in this rosette 
necessitated a 90° rotation of the sensor head on the instrument.  Cast 247 was 
conducted with CTD instrument 9 in the large rosette.  Then, we rotated the head 
to its normal vertical position, and took Sta. 248 in the same location with the 
small rosette.  This was done to document any sensor calibration change 
resulting from the head rotation.  Work then proceeded west, reoccupying 
stations made on the primary crossing.  On Sta. 252 the CTD package again hit 
the bottom.  The cable was badly kinked within 30 m of the CTD as a result, 
requiring us to re-terminate.  Stations 248--257 constitute the first repeat 
section, Stas. 258--267 the second.

After completing the repeat EAC sections, the ship headed southeast to make an 
ADCP section at latitude 32°15'S.  The section ran from 155°E into the coast 
(153 xxE).  Then we transited south in deep water while performing tests of the 
ADCP instrumentation while the scientific party began packing equipment.  We 
picked up the Sydney pilot early on July 30, and docked shortly thereafter.

Overall the leg was very successful and generally uneventful. Unlike the 
previous legs, weather was moderate much of the time keeping spirits high.  
Again in contrast to the previous legs, we did not experience significant 
difficulties with electrical power in the labs. Some mix of the crew's ongoing 
upgrade of ship's systems, installation of the harmonic filter, and the science 
team's increased ability to cope with less than perfect power is probably 
responsible for the improvement.  Following Marshall Swartz's lead from Leg 3, 
an informal study of electrical power was begun on Leg 5, but this was 
terminated when it was deemed it too intrusive to ship operations.  As sea 
conditions were quite moderate, we did not experience excessive stern slamming 
as on the earlier legs.  When it did occur however, the feeling was quite 
disconcerting, both for the amplitude of the flexing and its duration.  However, 
at no time during Leg 5 were operations affected by stern slamming.  Having two 
working winch systems proved very valuable.  Wire re-terminations could be done 
with no loss of work time.  As expected, electronic communication via the ATS 
satellite was not possible for most of the leg because we were too far west. 
Although effort was made, we were unable to make the system function through 
Inmarsat.  Communications were limited to Telex traffic and the occasional FAX.  
Finally, and perhaps most importantly,  we found the crew and officers to be 
highly knowledgeable, helpful and friendly. Their efforts to bring the Knorr back 
to fully operational status are to be commended.  I also found everyone in the 
science party to be good shipmates, and fun to work with.


SUMMARY OF OBSERVATIONS

Table 1 contains a list of hydrographic stations which make up the P06 section.  
For completeness, the listing includes all of the stations which make up the P06 
line.  A total of 79 CTD stations were obtained on Kn 138 Leg 5, 56 contributing 
to the one-time P06 section, 20 making up the repeated surveys of the EAC, one 
inter-comparison lowering and 2 test lowerings.  Approximately 1400 water samples 
were obtained along the one-time section on Leg 5 (7700 on the full section, fig 
2).  All samples were analyzed for salinity, dissolved oxygen and nutrient 
(silica, phosphate, nitrate, and nitrite) concentrations.  

The measurements of the dissolved chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) along this section 
were carried out by Dr. Mark Warner and Matthew Trunnell, both from the 
University of Washington, using the SIO analytical system.  This system had been 
used on the previous two expeditions, so all of the analytical problems had been 
eliminated. Approximately 690 samples from 38 stations were analyzed for F-11 
and F-12.  Approximately 30 of these were duplicate samples from the same 10-
liter bottle.  No CFC samples were drawn after station 247 due to the use of the 
smaller rosette package with 1.2-liter bottles due to both the lack of 
sufficient amounts of water and the higher contamination levels in these 
bottles.  These preliminary data have been included in the cruise hydrographic 
data files (.sea files) without many of the necessary corrections and 
elimination of questionable data points.  The CFC concentrations in the 
overlying air were also measured at least once per day during the expedition.

Dr. Warner also continued to run the underway system of Dr. Ray Weiss.  This 
system measures the partial pressures of carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, and 
methane in surface water and the atmosphere.  These measurements are each made 
twice per hour.  Dr. Bronte Tilbrook of CSIRO operated a similar system for 
intercalibration purposes on this expedition.  Samples were extracted at 19 
stations for shoreside determination of helium and tritium concentrations, and 
12 stations for C-14, Table 2.  Continuous logs of underway meteorology (via the 
IMET system) and surface ocean properties were obtained, as well as bathymetric 
data every 5 minutes while underway between stations.  A total of 11 ALACE 
floats were deployed on the leg, Table 3.

Samples were collected by the CO2 group from 22 stations at approximately 2 
degree spacing.  Eighteen of these stations were sampled concurrently with 
freons and other tracers.  Some 549 samples were analyzed for total dissolved 
carbon dioxide (TCO2), and of these 256 were also analyzed for the partial 
pressure of CO2 (pCO2).  The TCO2 analyses were made on an automated instrument 
(SOMMA) designed by K. M. Johnson with coulometric detection, while the pCO2 
analyses were made using a static equilibration technique under development at 
BNL utilizing a gas chromatograph for detection of CO2 after conversion to CH4.  
In addition, the SOMMA instrument was equipped with a Seabird SBE-4 conductance 
cell for the determination of salinity.

The precision of the TCO2 determination (estimated from the average difference 
between duplicate bottles collected from the same Niskin bottle (n = 45 pairs) 
is 0.60 µmol/kg.  Using an average TCO2 concentration of 2150 µmol/kg on this 
leg yields a precision of 0.028 %.  Accuracy is estimated from the analyses of 
two certified reference standards (CRM) having values of 1960.67 and 2188.77 
µmol/kg, respectively. Our mean result for these CRM on leg 3 are 1959.21 
(n=15) and 2187.17 (n=23), respectively.

In aggregate, the BNL groups analyzed more than 3000 samples for TCARBN, and nearly 
1000 samples for pCO2 during the P06 section.  The TCO2 data appears to be of high 
quality, and TCO2 will be contoured for the P06 section.  The quality of the pCO2 
data is not yet known because phase volume corrections are still to be made.  
Also encouraging is the preliminary finding that our salinity determinations 
agree with the salinometer result to better than 0.01 ppt.

ADCP data was collected throughout the cruise, along with navigation data from 
the ship's Magnavox GPS 200 receiver and heading from the ship's gyrocompass.  
In addition, independent heading measurements were collected using an Ashtech 
3DF GPS receiver, which also provided 1 Hz measurements of pitch and roll.

Data files containing the preliminary hydrographic observations were shared 
among the cruise participants at the completion of the cruise.


TABLE 3: Deployment Log for ALACE Drifters Kn 138 Leg 5 P06 West

         Instrument  Deployment time         Position
         ----------  ---------------  -----------------------
            158       920715 1202 Z   30°3.17'S   175°31.10'E
            160       920716 1150     30°5.65     173°29.58
            159       920717 1215     30°4.86     171°0.51
            143       920718 0559     30°3.94     168°59.77
            146       920719 0219     30°3.55     166°28.80
            157       920720 0226     30°5.03     163°55.04
            152       920720 1357     30°5.04     162°48.94
            153       920721 2040     30°19.71    159°5.31
            145       920723 0924     30°5.17     156°30.57
            147       920724 0115     30°4.22     154°59.23
            156       920724 2014     30°6.58     153°53.93


               Nominal watch list for CTD Operations

     0400 -- 1200    |  1200 -- 2000        |  2000 -- 0400
     ----------------|----------------------|-------------------
     John Church     |  Steve Chiswell      |  John Toole
     Neil White      |  Peter Landry        |  Chuck Corry
     Dave Wellwood*  |  Ellyn Montgomery**  |  Bernadette Heaney
     Sue Wijffels    |  George Knapp*       |  Dave Hollaway
                     |                      | 
     *Hydrographers
     **Data Processor


                     |  0000 -- 1200        |  1200 -- 0000
          -----------|----------------------|---------------
          CFC        |  Mark Warner         |  Matt Trunnell
          -----------|----------------------|---------------
          Nutrients  |  Consuelo Carbonell  |  Joe Jennings 



A.5.  MAJOR PROBLEMS AND GOALS NOT ACHIEVED

None

A.6.  OTHER INCIDENTS OF NOTE

None


A.7.  LIST OF CRUISE PARTICIPANTS

Cruise participants and their responsibilities are listed in Table 4 for each 
leg.


TABLE 4:  List of cruise participants

Responsibility              Individual                Institution
--------------------------  ------------------------  ------------------
LEG 3:          
  CTD Software Tech:        Carol MacMurray           WHOI
  CTD Hardware Tech:        Gary Bond                 WHOI
  Data Quality Expert and   Bob Millard               WHOI
   thermosalinograph:

  Rosette salinity samples  Theresa Turner      
  Rosette oxygen samples    George Knapp              WHOI
  Rosette nutrient samples  Hernan Garcia             OSU 
                            Andy Ross                 OSU
  Rosette Freon samples     Kevin Sullivan            UM RSMAS
                            Kevin Maillet             UM RSMAS
  Rosette Tritium/Helium    Mike Mathewson            WHOI
  CO2                       Ken Johnson               Brookhaven 
                            Kevin Wills               Brookhaven 
                            Craig Neil                Brookhaven
  C-14                      Rich Rotter               Princeton
  ADCP                      Michael Kosro             OSU 
  Watch Standers:           Marshall Swartz           WHOI
                            Susan Hautala      
                            Paul Robbins      
                            Phil Morgan      
                            Alistair Adcroft      
                            Carmen Jara      
                            Sergio Salinas     
  SSG Techs:                Harold Rochat             WHOI
                            Earl Young                WHOI
  

Responsibility              Individual                Institution
--------------------------  ------------------------  ------------------
LEG 4          
  CTD Software Tech:        Carol MacMurray           WHOI
  CTD Data Asst:            Sarah Zimmermann          WHOI
  CTD Hardware Tech:        Peter Landry              WHOI
  Hydrography:           
  Rosette salinity samples  Firuse Stalcup            WHOI 
  Rosette oxygen samples    Marv Stalcup              WHOI
  Rosette nutrient samples  Joe Jennings              OSU 
                            Dennis Guffy              Texas A&M
  Rosette Freon samples     Rick VanWoy               SIO
                            Peter Salameh             SIO
  Rosette Tritium/Helium    Scot Birdwhistell     
  CO2                       Richard Wilke             Brookhaven 
                            David Hunter              Brookhaven 
                            Meredith Anderson         Brookhaven
  C-14                      Gerry McDonald            Princeton
  ADCP:                     Stephen Pierce            OSU 
  Watch Standers:           Jeff Kinder      
                            Elise Ralph      
                            Molly Baringer      
                            Bernadette Sloyan      
                            David Vaudrey             WHOI
  SSG Tech:                 Lenny Boutin              WHOI
  

Responsibility              Individual                Institution
--------------------------  ------------------------  ------------------
LEG 5          
  CTD Software Tech:        Ellyn Montgomery          WHOI 
  CTD Hardware Tech:        Peter Landry              WHOI
  Hydrography:           
  Rosette salinity samples  Dave Wellwood             WHOI
  Rosette oxygen samples    George Knapp              WHOI
  Rosette nutrient samples  Joe Jennings              OSU 
                            Consuelo Carbonell-Moore  OSU
  Rosette Freon samples     Mark Warner               UW 
                            Matt Trunnell             UW
  Rosette Tritium/Helium    Mike Mathewson            WHOI
  CO2                       Ken Johnson               Brookhaven 
                            Victoria Coles            RSMAS 
                            Bronte Tilbrook           CSIRO
  C-14                      Gerry McDonald            Princeton
  ADCP:                     Mike Kosro                OSU
  Watch Standers:           John Church               WHOI
                            Steve Chiswell            NZOI
                            Chuck Corry               WHOI
                            Bernadette Heaney         CSIRO 
                            David Hollaway       
                            Neil White                CSIRO
                            Susan Wijffles            WHOI
  SSG Tech:                 Lenny Boutin              WHOI     


      
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
      

B.    UNDERWAY MEASUREMENTS

B.1.  NAVIGATION AND BATHYMETRY 
      (John Toole)

Manual logging of ocean depth was conducted on all 3 legs of P06. This work 
utilized the 12 kHz sounding system installed on the Knorr. Following WHPO 
guidelines, depths were noted every 10 minutes along track between stations. 
Position data for each depth measurement was extracted from the GPS fix record 
taken by the shipboard ADCP system (M. Kosro, lead scientist). Three ASCII files 
are submitted: LEG3.FNL, LEG4.FNL, LEG5.FNL formatted with one line per 
measurement of: time, latitude, longitude, depth. 

Time is in decimal day in 1992; the position data are in decimal degrees 
(negative being south and west respectively). The depth data in meters are 
uncorrected for speed of sound. Time gaps in the record correspond to periods on 
station when the ship's pinger was turned off to facilitate tracking the CTD 
package.


B.2.  ACOUSTIC DOPPLER CURRENT PROFILER (ADCP) 
      (Mike Kosro)

This section not available as of December 7, 1994 


B.3.  THERMOSALINOGRAPH AND UNDERWAY DISSOLVED GASSES
      (Charles Corry)

A Falmouth Scientific Instruments (FSI) thermosalinograph (TSG) was mounted on 
the bow of the Knorr approximately 3 m below the surface and operated on all 
legs except the latter part of Leg4, where corrosion of the anodized aluminum 
housing rendered it inoperable. The instrument was replaced in Auckland and 
operated satisfactorily throughout Leg5.

Comparisons between the surface water samples and the thermosalinograph were 
done on Leg3 and the results are given in Table 5. 


TABLE 5:  P06E (Leg3) thermosalinograph calibrations

Sta   BTL   CTD    TSG        CTD        TSG        Conduc-    Salinity   Oxygen
 #     #    Pres   Surface    Temp.      Surface    tivity     water      water
            Dbar   Temp       Celsius    Conduc-    water      Sample     Sample
                   Celsius               tivity     Samples
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 1    24    3.6    16.921     16.8676    41.154     44.0982    34.412     5.575
 4     9    3.2    15.657     15.1002    39.88      42.2152    34.2679    5.636
 5    23    3.4    15.505     15.4778    39.725     42.6065    34.2983    5.793
 6    23    3.7    15.896     15.7668    40.107     42.9128    34.3115    5.83 
 7    23    3      16.413     16.2657    40.658     43.4536    34.3584    5.648
 8    24    3.9    16.627     16.6198    40.652     43.843     34.4031    5.568
 9    36    3.2    16.825     16.8368    41.086     44.071     34.4151    5.551
10    36    3.8    16.466     16.4458    40.634     43.5569    34.3007    5.631
11    36    3.6    16.949     16.9308    41.163     44.138     34.3949    5.474
12    36    3.7    17.018     16.9859    41.048     43.9771    34.2103    5.558
13    36    3.3    17.188     16.9373    41.197     44.0141    34.2825    5.586
14    36    3.5    17.54      17.5279    41.598     44.5977    34.2879    5.57 
15    36    3.6    18.134     18.1194    42.199     45.2395    34.3392    5.444
16    36    3.8    17.881     17.9159    41.731     44.7912    34.1279    5.506
17    36    3.1    17.863     17.8484    41.664     44.6602    34.0711    5.497
18    36    3.3    18.246     18.2384    42.172     45.2144    34.2154    5.394
19    36    3.8    18.195     18.1949    42.117     45.1623    34.2081    5.404
20    36    3.6    17.89      17.8889    41.733     44.7431    34.107     5.477
22    11    3.5    18.981     18.968     43.303     46.4166    34.6168    5.343
23    36    3.8    18.523     18.5169    42.78      45.848     34.5201    5.406
24    36    3.8    18.708     18.7111    43.032     46.1329    34.5961    5.386
25    36    3.5    18.548     18.5373    42.863     45.9279    34.5669    5.407
26    36    3.8    18.229     18.2198    42.575     45.6196    34.5751    5.387
28    36    3.8    19.041     19.029     43.563     46.6785    34.7885    5.33 
29    36    3      18.707     18.7029    43.177     46.2741    34.719     5.37 
30    36    3.4    18.478     18.4838    42.929     46.0323    34.7038    5.398
31    36    3.8    18.6       18.6178    42.957     46.0977    34.6423    5.418
32    36    3.4    18.745     18.1649    43.256     45.4802    34.4964    5.416
33    36    3.1    19.266     19.2605    43.924     47.0806    34.9268    5.305
35    36    3.7    18.245     18.2087    42.499     45.5235    34.5054    5.536
37    36    3.4    18.568     18.55      42.984     46.0117    34.6295    5.381
38    24    3.6    18.732     18.7188    43.251     46.2996    34.7302    5.372
39    36    3.5    19.111     19.1112    43.815     46.8941    34.8967    5.29 
40    36    3      19.266     19.329     44.13      99.999     -9         -9    
41    35    3.8    18.549     18.5469    42.946     45.9859    34.6091    5.356
42    36    3.4    18.381     18.3779    42.81      45.7396    34.5459    5.395
45    36    3.4    19.4127    19.4127    47.0882    47.3859    35.0492    5.282
46    36    3.9    19.3225    19.3225    46.9727    47.2675    35.0276    5.261
47    36    3.6    19.215     19.215     46.6401    46.9345    34.8428    5.288
48    36    3.8    19.013     19.0049    43.664     46.6123    34.7465    5.31 
49    36    3.5    19.124     19.1072    43.846     46.7771    34.8043    5.282
50    36    3.3    19.545     19.5349    44.034     47.4647    35.0155    5.247
51    36    3.9    19.048     19.0389    43.764     46.7582    34.8424    5.303
52    36    3.2    18.749     18.7511    43.35      46.2481    34.6588    5.322
53    36    3.3    18.702     18.6973    43.43      46.3047    34.7545    5.326
54    36    3.7    19.678     19.6455    44.85      47.766     35.1713    5.228
55    36    3      19.478     19.4736    44.44      47.3814    34.997     5.253
56    36    3.4    19.817     19.802     45.041     47.9979    35.2333    5.2    
57    36    3.1    19.748     19.7337    44.942     47.8831    35.1922    5.224
58    36    4      20.115     20.0827    45.278     48.2633    35.2164    5.168
59    36    3.9    20.351     20.3434    45.645     48.6291    35.2948    5.139
60    36    3      19.774     19.7675    44.186     47.758     35.0644    5.206
61    36    3.9    19.671     19.663     44.626     47.5504    34.9785    5.223
62    36    3.3    19.163     19.1574    43.923     46.7966    34.7789    5.274
63    36    3.8    18.665     18.6549    43.265     46.0931    34.6101    5.328
64    36    3      19.854     19.848     45.096     48.0579    35.242     5.185
65    36    3.7    19.819     19.7969    45.049     47.985     35.2272    5.185
66    36    3.8    19.936     19.936     45.158     48.1204    35.2189    5.188
67    36    3.3    19.624     19.6173    44.654     47.5814    35.0415    5.221
68    36    3.7    19.24      19.5314    44.654     47.4961    35.0443    5.238
69    36    3      19.071     18.9706    43.756     46.5752    34.7486    5.302
70    36    3.3    19.795     19.7996    44.989     47.955     35.1971    5.194
71    36    3.8    19.542     19.5385    44.593     47.521     35.0589    5.221
72    36    3.1    19.777     19.7295    44.856     47.7479    35.0886    5.212

Note: I think such calibrations were done on the other legs and that data should 
      be obtained CEC 12/5/94.


An underway fluorometer was operated on Legs 3 and 4 but failed before the end 
of Leg 4. John Marra, LDEO, was the principal investigator for that measurement.

A number of underway measurements of the atmospheric chemistry were made by Ray 
Weiss group.



B.4. EXPENDABLE BATHYTHERMOGRAPH AND SALINITY MEASUREMENTS

No XBT or XCTD casts were done on any leg of this cruise.



B.5. METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS
     (Margaret Cook)

Data from the IMET system aboard R/V Knorr was reduced by Ken Prada (WHOI) and 
submitted to NCAR. The P06 data in NetCDF format are available via the network 
from Steve Worley at NCAR. His network address for email is worley@ncar.ncar.edu 
He can also be reached by telephone at (303) 497-1248. To access these data, 
Steve Worley should be contacted at NCAR. He will set up an anonymous FTP for 
you. The address of the machine we extracted data from was ncardata.ucar.edu. He 
will enable you to receive UNIX TAR files across the network. Most of these 
contain data files. There is a file, imet_asc.tar, which contains the full 
software package for reading the NetCDF files. Program imet_asc is used to 
access the binary NetCDF files and output ascii files for subsequent analysis. 
There are a few things we learned about this data which will be of interest to 
whomever is using it.

1. Wind direction is logged in oceanographic rather than meteorological terms.   
   That is, where the wind is going, rather than where it is coming from.

2. Corrections were supposedly being made automatically to the data based upon   
   a compass installed in the wind sensor. Unfortunately, the compass was not   
   always working correctly. The theory is that when it was not working, no   
   corrections were made. We understand that during P06 the compass was probably    
   disconnected and so the data does need to be corrected for ship's speed and   
   direction.

3. The files contained in the TAR files are not always chronological. Many   
   files contain two or more nonconsecutive time periods, and one time period   
   may be split between two or more nonsequential files. There are also many   
   time periods which seem to be missing altogether.


      
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
      

C.   HYDROGRAPHIC MEASUREMENTS

C.1. GENERAL INFORMATION

The Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution's CTD/Hydrography Group was responsible 
for the basic hydrography on the P06 cruise. We employed A 36-bottle-position 
underwater frame and 10-litre sample bottles designed and constructed by the 
Ocean Data Facility at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography. Modified MkIII 
Conductivity-Temperature- Depth (CTD) instruments mounted on the frame were 
supplied by the WHOI Group, as were the data acquisition and processing computer 
systems.

Three CTD instruments (WHOI ID's #7, 9 and 10) were available during the cruise. 
Instrument #10 was used on the bulk of the stations; #9 was pressed into service 
briefly during the middle leg when #10 suffered an electronic failure. Details 
of which instrument was used when are given in Water sample nutrient data

The following was excerpted from the at-sea log kept by the CTD data processor 
on each leg (Carol MacMurray: Legs 3, 4; Ellyn Montgomery: Leg 5). The log 
details the major difficulties experienced on P06. In general, operations on 
stations not discussed below went more-or-less normally.

CTD 10 was the primary instrument on the cruise, No.9 was called into service 
for some 10 stations during leg 3 when No. 10 failed. CTD No. 9 also failed on 
that leg, but by that time CTD No. 10 had been repaired. Details of which CTD 
was used on which stations are given in Table 6.    


TABLE 6:  CTD instrument and station numbers

          CTD Number  Cruise Leg  Station Numbers    
          ----------  ----------  ------------------------------------
          CTD 10      Leg 3:      1, 4-72      
                      Leg 4:      74, 75, 86-111, 113-140 142-186,1 88
                      Leg 5:      190-212      
          CTD 9       Leg 3:      3      
                      Leg 4:      76-85, 112, 141, 187      
                      Leg 5:      189      
          CTD 7       Leg 3:      2      
                      Leg 4:      73      
                      Leg 5:      None     


CTDs 9 and 10 were equipped with a second temperature channel (using an FSI 
Ocean Temperature Module). Data from these sensors were used to assess when 
during the cruise shifts in the primary temperature sensor occurred. 
CTD No. 10 was also equipped with a pump, designed to make uniform the flow of 
seawater past the dissolved oxygen sensor. The oxygen pump was used throughout 
leg3. Careful examination of the Leg3 data after the cruise suggested the pump 
did not function as well as was hoped (or tested on earlier expeditions). The 
oxygen current data are quite noisy in the top several hundred meters from 
Leg3. (Possibly the pump was cavitating on air not bled from the supply tube.) 
In any event, the final P06 data from Leg3 have quite noisy oxygens in the 
upper ocean. Users may wish to do some vertical averaging/filtering prior to 
using these data. The oxygen pump was removed from the system at the start of 
Leg4 and not used for the rest of the expedition.


SHOREBASED PROCESSOR: 

MicroVAX Data subdirectory: R2D2:<CTD.KN138P003

NOTE: The ship departed Valparaiso as Knorr 138 Leg3. We will keep the 
      directory KN138 throughout all three legs and increment the station 
      numbers.

NOTE: There was an FSI CTD and Scripps logger attached to the package for 
      selected stations on Leg5 to obtain comparison data to test this new 
      instrument. 


DATA ACQUISITION

MICROVAX II CTD03 with WHOI AQUI89 acquisition package (Version 1.0+) 

Logging data to: Vhs vcr tape recorder 9T Microvax disk file 
(No.No.No.ANo.No.No..RAW) in CTD78 format (*.WRW,*.WSC,*.HED,*.ERR) 
in ASCII format



CTD 10 
AT SEA COMMON USED FOR DATA ACQUISITION CTD No.10. 

The laboratory derived calibration constants used in the real-time display 
of data during the cruise are given in Table 7.


TABLE 7:  CTD No. 10 calibration constants

VNo  attribute 1    attribute 2       slope          bias       sensor lag
--  -------------  -------------  -------------  -------------  ------------
 1  -0.294565E-08   0.000000E+00   0.100352E+00  -0.246449E+00  0.000000E+00
 2   0.225955E-11   0.000000E+00   0.499864E-03   0.186416E-02  0.250000E+00
 3  -0.650000E-05   0.150000E-07   0.100631E-02  -0.177214E-02  0.000000E+00
 4   0.280000E+01   0.300000E+04   0.100000E+01   0.000000E+00  0.000000E+00
 5  -0.360000E-01   0.115000E-03   0.123300E-02   0.000000E+00  0.000000E+00
 6   0.750000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.128000E+00   0.000000E+00  0.000000E+00
 7  -0.707350E+02   0.246810E+01  -0.909828E-02   0.362914E+02  0.000000E+00
 8   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.100000E+01   0.000000E+01  0.000000E+00
 9   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.500000E-03  -0.200000E+01  0.000000E+00
10   0.543326E-01  -0.413000E-05   0.100000E+01   0.218000E+02  0.000000E+00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
TP cals changed station 60: S1=+2.71E-6 S2=-0.054 Pressure Bias set to -0.8 
Station 60.



CTD 9
AT SEA COMMONLY USED FOR DATA ACQUISITION CTD No.9 
    

TABLE 8:  CTD No. 9 calibration constants

VNo  attribute 1    attribute 2       slope          bias       sensor lag
--  -------------  -------------  -------------  -------------  ------------
1    0.297377E-09   0.000000E+00   0.100557E+00   0.450652E+00  0.000000E+00
2    0.197920E-11   0.000000E+00   0.500248E-03  -0.361583E-01  0.250000E+00
3   -0.650000E-05   0.150000E-07   0.997986E-03  -0.231510E-01  0.000000E+00
4    0.280000E+01   0.300000E+04   0.100000E+01   0.000000E+00  0.000000E+00
5   -0.360000E-01   0.115000E-03   0.148000E-02   0.000000E+00  0.000000E+00
6    0.750000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.128000E+00   0.000000E+00  0.000000E+00
7   -0.227549E+03   0.126625E+02  -0.904813E-02   0.379786E+02  0.000000E+00
8    0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.100000E+01   0.000000E+01  0.000000E+00
9    0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.500000E-03  -0.200000E+01  0.000000E+00
10  -0.141909E-01  -0.353000E-05   0.100000E+01   0.218000E+02  0.000000E+00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
TP cals changed leg 4: S1=+3.39E-6 S2=+.015



CTD 7
AT SEA COMMONLY USED FOR DATA ACQUISITION CTD No. 7 
Calibration constants for this CTD are given in Table 7.     


TABLE 9:  CTD No. 7 calibration constants

VNo  attribute 1    attribute 2       slope          bias       sensor lag
--  -------------  -------------  -------------  -------------  ------------
1   -0.802577E-09   0.000000E+00   0.999165E-01   0.366930E+00  0.000000E+00
2    0.131918E-11   0.000000E+00   0.499886E-03   0.627969E-03  0.250000E+00
3   -0.650000E-05   0.150000E-07   0.984760E-03   0.380964E-01  0.000000E+00
4    0.280000E+01   0.300000E+04   0.100000E+01   0.000000E+00  0.000000E+00
5   -0.360000E-01   0.115000E-03   0.240500E-02   0.000000E+00  0.000000E+00
6    0.750000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.128000E+00   0.000000E+00  0.000000E+00
7    0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.100000E+01   0.000000E+00  0.000000E+00
8    0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.100000E+01   0.000000E+00  0.000000E+00
9    0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.500000E-03  -0.200000E+01  0.000000E+00
10   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.100000E+01   0.000000E+00  0.000000E+00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
TP cals changed leg 4: S1=-2.54E-6 S2=-0.40                


SHIPBOARD PROCESSING

Description of computer system used:

CTDED78 run on MicroVAX Acquisition CTD78 format raw data 9T files. output to 
MicroVAX disk files 
[CTD.KN138P003.CTDED78]No.No.No.No.DNo.No.No..EDT

error identification downtrace ***discovered bug in editor at sea: given true 
pressure limits, program will truncate CTD data by 7-13110011dbar depending 
on the depth. Deeper the station, more severe the truncation. Noticed in 
Chilean trench. Workaround: add 20 dbars to max pressure limit observed by CTD 
(on station log). Record limits do not seem to override this discrepancy. 

***discovered similar flakyness on Leg5. Sometimes the record min for 
processing is ignored, when processing from disk files. Using the AQUI 
9tracks allowed correct processing in these cases.

Water sample Programs: BTLFMTVX, WOCTMPV2* (to produce WOCE template) 
BTLMRGV2, SEAMERG2 (to merge sa, ox, nuts data) CONVERT, HYDOUTV (to 
create .dyn file)

*woctmpv2 was revised at sea to incorporate new PRESSC.for code

Water sample corrections: [ctd.kn138p003.john]fixtp.com modifies .wrw 
files to include a compensation for tp.

Water sample filenames: Salinity and Oxygen Rosette Samples for overplotting 
ctd and bottle data

KN138.WSD - all stations KN138.DYN - all stations for overplotting Merged CTD, 
SA, OX, Nutrient water sample filename:

KN138.SEA - WOCE template, all stations appended together



C.2.  WATER SAMPLE SALINITY AND OXYGEN DATA 
      (George Knapp)

Water sample analysis for salinity and dissolved oxygen was conducted in a 
WHOI portable laboratory secured to the deck of the ship. The portable 
laboratory is capable of maintaining a constant environmental temperature 
within q 1xC. The nominal laboratory temperature was 22xC. Two Guildline 
Autosal Model 8400A salinometers were utilized to determine water sample 
salinities (WHOI instrument numbers 10 and 11). Water sample analysis for 
dissolved oxygen was also performed in the constant temperature laboratory 
using a modified Winkler titration technique. The measurements were 
conducted on 50 ml aliquots of the samples.

A complete description of the dissolved oxygen and salinity measurement 
techniques used during this cruise are presented by Knapp, et al. (1990).

OXYGEN

Each oxygen bottle was rinsed twice with sample water and then carefully 
filled to avoid aeration. Approximately 300 ml of the sample was permitted to 
overflow the bottle. One ml each of the MnCl2 and NaI-NaOH reagents was 
immediately added to the seawater and the sample bottle was capped and shaken 
vigorously. When all of the oxygen samples had been collected, they were 
placed in the constant temperature portable lab to thermally equilibrate and 
await analysis. About an hour after the oxygen samples were collected, they 
were shaken a second time to ensure complete oxidation of the precipitant. 

Just before the oxygen samples were to be titrated, one ml of H2SO4 was added 
to each sample, followed by a second vigorous shaking to dissolve the 
precipitate and release iodine proportional to the dissolved oxygen originally 
in the sample. A 50 ml aliquot of the iodine solution from each bottle was 
titrated with 0.01 N sodium thiosulphate using an automated amperometric 
end-point detection method controlled by a computer. The normality of the 
thiosulphate was determined regularly by comparison with a biiodate standard 
solution which has a normality of exactly 0.0100. The reagent blank value was 
also determined periodically.


SALINITY

Salinity samples were collected from the rosette after most other samples had 
been drawn. Bottles and caps were rinsed twice, and then the bottles were 
filled to within one half inch of the neck, leaving air space to allow for 
expansion as the samples warmed.

Analysis of the salinity samples was not conducted until samples achieved 
laboratory temperature, generally about 5-6 hours after collection. Before 
each salinity bottle was opened it was thoroughly shaken to remove gradients. 
Both the filling tube and the sealing cork on the salinometer were carefully 
dried before each sample was measured to avoid contamination from the previous 
sample. The rate at which the air pump fills the conductivity cell with 
seawater was adjusted to ensure that the sample reached bath temperature 
before the conductivity ratio was measured. The salinometer was standardized 
daily with IAPSO Standard Sea Water (SSW) Batch P116 during the entire cruise 
and the zero reference and heater lamps were checked daily.

On June 18th, during the second leg, salinometer no. 11 began showing a 
tendency of displaying salinities that were offset on the high side by about .
006 psu. This would occur apparently randomly, and would last from 5-15 
minutes. Very difficult to detect during normal operation, it was only noticed 
during a standardization. Therefore, analysis was switched to the backup 
Autosal, no. 10 for the remainder of the cruise. It is now believed this 
problem was caused by either radio frequency noise, or power line noise, and 
that no. 10 was more immune to the noise than no. 11.


TABLE 10:  Salinity standardization data for the WOCE P06 cruise

              Sal   Oper-  Temp.
       Batch   #    ator    °C    Zero      Sby       Date       Time
-----  -----  ---   -----  ---- --------  -------  ----------  --------
STDZE  P116   11     TT     24  -0.00002  24+5966  05-01-1992  16:27:21
STDZE  P116   11     TT     24  -0.00002  24+5969  05-02-1992  10:21:26
STDZE  P116   11     TT     24  -0.00002  24+5970  05-03-1992  14:44:10
STDZE  P116   11     TT     24  -0.00002  24+5970  05-04-1992  13:24:38
STDZE  P116   11     TT     24  -0.00002  24+5962  05-05-1992  12:43:57
STDZE  P116   11     TT     24  -0.00002  24+5963  05-06-1992  12:58:31
STDZE  P116   11     TT     24  -0.00002  24+5963  05-07-1992  13:20:51
STDZE  P116   11     TT     24  -0.00002  24+5963  05-08-1992  13:02:33
STDZE  P116   11     TT     24  -0.00002  24+5959  05-09-1992  16:17:39
STDZE  P116   11     TT     24  -0.00002  24+5958  05-10-1992  14:04:17
STDZE  P116   11     TT     24  -0.00002  24+5958  05-11-1992  13:50:40
STDZE  P116   11     TT     24  -0.00002  24+5958  05-12-1992  13:29:16
STDZE  P116   11     TT     24  -0.00002  24+5958  05-13-1992  15:47:29
STDZE  P116   11     TT     24  -0.00002  24+5958  05-14-1992  08:56:13
STDZE  P116   11     TT     24  -0.00002  24+5959  05-15-1992  14:03:03
STDZE  P116   11     TT     24  -0.00001  24+5961  05-16-1992  15:15:07
STDZE  P116   11     TT     24  -0.00001  24+5961  05-17-1992  15:13:52
STDZE  P116   11     TT     24  -0.00001  24+5961  05-18-1992  18:33:48
STDZE  P116   11     TT     24  -0.00001  24+5961  05-19-1992  11:54:46
STDZE  P116   11     TT     24  -0.00001  24+5961  05-20-1992  14:22:33
STDZE  P116   11     TT     24  -0.00001  24+5960  05-21-1992  14:27:12
STDZE  P116   11     TT     24  -0.00001  24+5963  05-22-1992  13:32:34
STDZE  P116   11     TT     24  -0.00001  24+5961  05-23-1992  14:23:32
STDZE  P116   11     TT     24  -0.00001  24+5962  05-24-1992  14:36:32
STDZE  P116   11     FS     24  -0.00001  24+5962  05-31-1992  14:25:44
STDZE  P116   11     FS     24   0.00000  24+5961  06-01-1992  15:50:26
STDZE  P116   11     FS     24  -0.00001  24+5962  06-02-1992  15:46:47
STDZE  P116   11     FS     24  -0.00001  24+5967  06-03-1992  15:52:50
STDZE  P116   11     FS     24  -0.00001  24+5961  06-04-1992  16:56:11
STDZE  P116   11     FS     24  -0.00001  24+5962  06-05-1992  17:26:43
STDZE  P116   11     FS     24  -0.00001  24+5962  06-06-1992  17:04:25
STDZE  P116   11     FS     24  -0.00001  24+5961  06-08-1992  17:02:35
STDZE  P116   11     FS     24  -0.00002  24+5961  06-09-1992  04:51:37
STDZE  P116   11     FS     24  -0.00001  24+5961  06-09-1992  16:54:46
STDZE  P116   11     FS     24  -0.00001  24+5961  06-10-1992  22:39:52
STDZE  P116   11     FS     24  -0.00001  24+5967  06-11-1992  17:40:53
STDZE  P116   11     FS     24  -0.00001  24+5962  06-11-1992  20:36:21
STDZE  P116   11     FS     24  -0.00001  24+5961  06-12-1992  16:58:19
STDZE  P116   11     FS     24  -0.00001  24+5961  06-3-1992   18:08:16
STDZE  P116   11     FS     24  -0.00001  24+5961  06-14-1992  21:11:59

              Sal   Oper-  Temp.
       Batch   #    ator    °C    Zero      Sby       Date       Time
-----  -----  ---   -----  ---- --------  -------  ----------  --------
STDZE  P116   11     FS     24  -0.00001  24+5961  06-15-1992  18:23:58
STDZE  P116   11     FS     24  -0.00001  24+5962  06-16-1992  03:25:03
STDZE  P116   11     FS     24  -0.00001  24+5962  06-16-1992  17:10:53
STDZE  P116   11     FS     24  -0.00001  24+5955  06-18-1992  00:38:21
STDZE  P116   11     FS     24  -0.00001  24+5962  06-18-1992  17:50:09
STDZE  P116   10     FS     24  -0.00004  24+5710  06-18-1992  22:20:55
STDZE  P116   10     FS     24  -0.00004  24+5711  06-18-1992  23:59:50
STDZE  P116   10     FS     24  -0.00002  24+5711  06-19-1992  18:02:03
STDZE  P116   10     FS     24  -0.00002  24+5711  06-19-1992  20:28:36
STDZE  P116   10     FS     24  -0.00002  24+5711  06-20-1992  04:22:29
STDZE  P116   10     FS     24   0.00000  24+5711  06-20-1992  18:36:16
STDZE  P116   10     FS     24   0.00000  24+5710  06-21-1992  17:29:18
STDZE  P116   10     FS     24   0.00000  24+5709  06-22-1992  05:34:32
STDZE  P116   10     FS     24   0.00000  24+5709  06-22-1992  18:24:00
STDZE  P116   10     FS     24   0.00000  24+5703  06-23-1992  18:38:43
STDZE  P116   10     FS     24   0.00000  24+5708  06-24-1992  19:12:47
STDZE  P116   10     MS     24   0.00000  24+5709  06-26-1992  19:13:05
STDZE  P116   10     MS     24   0.00000  24+5710  06-26-1992  19:13:51
STDZE  P116   10     MS     24   0.00000  24+5710  06-26-1992  19:14:07
STDZE  P116   10     MS     24   0.00000  24+5708  06-27-1992  19:13:08
STDZE  P116   10     MS     24   0.00000  24+5708  06-28-1992  19:10:51
STDZE  P116   10     MS     24  -0.00002  24+5708  06-29-1992  02:36:54
STDZE  P116   10     MS     24  -0.00001  24+5707  06-30-1992  06:00:16
STDZE  P116   10     MS     24  -0.00002  24+5707  07-03-1992  20:25:47
STDZE  P116   10     MS     24  -0.00002  24+5707  07-04-1992  21:54:17
STDZE  P116   10     DW     24   0.00000  24+5707  07-14-1992  02:25:13
STDZE  P116   10     DW     24  -0.00001  24+5707  07-15-1992  02:40:02
STDZE  P116   10     DW     24  -0.00001  24+5707  07-16-1992  15:57:25
STDZE  P116   10     DW     24  -0.00002  24+5706  07-17-1992  15:49:23
STDZE  P116   10     DW     24  -0.00002  24+5706  07-18-1992  16:43:51
STDZE  P116   10     DW     24  -0.00002  24+5706  07-19-1992  16:38:04
STDZE  P116   10     DW     24  -0.00002  24+5711  07-20-1992  17:28:33
STDZE  P116   10     GK     24  -0.00002  24+5709  07-21-1992  19:59:34
STDZE  P116   10     GK     24  -0.00001  24+5710  07-22-1992  20:09:16
STDZE  P116   10     GK     24  -0.00002  24+5710  07-23-1992  19:41:17
STDZE  P116   10     GK     24  -0.00002  24+5709  07-24-1992  20:51:10
STDZE  P116   10     GK     24  -0.00002  24+5708  07-25-1992  20:48:36
STDZE  P116   10     GK     24  -0.00002  24+5708  07-26-1992  20:56:50
STDZE  P116   10     GK     24  -0.00002  24+5708  07-27-1992  20:22:51


Table 11 contains all of the dissolved oxygen standardization and blank 
determinations made during WOCE cruise P06.


TABLE 11:  Dissolved oxygen standardization and blank determinations

LEG 3                              End    Thio-
  Mode       Butette Volumes       Volt   sulfate      Date        Time
  -----   ---------------------   ------  -------   ----------   --------
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0210   4.469    05-02-1992   16:06:55
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0210   4.491    05-02-1992   16:06:55
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0210   4.467    05-02-1992   16:06:55
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0210   4.460    05-02-1992   16:06:55
  BLANK   15.000  49.971  0.999   0.987    0.0060   05-02-1992   16:18:03
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0140   4.462    05-06-1992   12:14:37
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0210   4.466    05-06-1992   12:14:37
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0140   4.499    05-06-1992   12:14:37
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0140   4.496    05-06-1992   12:14:37
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0140   4.478    05-06-1992   12:14:37
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0140   4.471    05-06-1992   12:14:37
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0210   4.482    05-06-1992   12:14:37
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0140   4.473    05-06-1992   12:14:37
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.420    05-08-1992   12:46:59
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.418    05-08-1992   12:46:59
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.426    05-08-1992   12:46:59
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.415    05-08-1992   12:46:59
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.443    05-11-1992   12:22:28
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.437    05-11-1992   12:22:28
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0150   4.444    05-11-1992   12:22:28
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.433    05-11-1992   12:22:28
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0310   4.469    05-13-1992   13:01:40
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.466    05-13-1992   13:01:40
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.472    05-13-1992   13:01:40
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.465    05-13-1992   13:01:40
  BLANK   15.000  49.971  1.002   0.992    0.0040   05-13-1992   13:13:05
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.493    05-15-1992   12:41:53
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.480    05-15-1992   12:41:53
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.492    05-15-1992   12:41:53
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.482    05-15-1992   12:41:53
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0150   4.519    05-17-1992   01:40:05
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0150   4.508    05-17-1992   01:40:05
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0310   4.237    05-17-1992   14:10:07
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.255    05-17-1992   14:10:07
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.262    05-17-1992   14:10:07
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.256    05-17-1992   14:10:07
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.273    05-18-1992   17:16:51
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.263    05-18-1992   17:16:51
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.274    05-19-1992   14:46:39
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.268    05-19-1992   14:46:39
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.272    05-19-1992   14:46:39
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.263    05-19-1992   14:46:39
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.280    05-20-1992   13:06:13
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.277    05-20-1992   13:06:13
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.473    05-21-1992   12:59:29
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.463    05-21-1992   12:59:29
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.480    05-21-1992   12:59:29
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.474    05-21-1992   12:59:29
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.483    05-22-1992   13:14:14
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.473    05-22-1992   13:14:14
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.482    05-23-1992   12:55:44
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.483    05-23-1992   12:55:44
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.491    05-23-1992   12:55:44
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.479    05-23-1992   12:55:44
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.510    05-24-1992   14:10:14
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.511    05-24-1992   14:10:14
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.454    05-24-1992   23:12:28
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.448    05-24-1992   23:12:28
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.461    05-24-1992   23:12:28
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.429    05-24-1992   23:12:28
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.498    06-01-1992   15:42:34
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.502    06-01-1992   15:42:34
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.548    06-01-1992   16:00:46
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.542    06-01-1992   16:00:46
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.526    06-01-1992   16:00:46
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.519    06-01-1992   16:00:46
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.555    06-02-1992   15:21:12
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.560    06-02-1992   15:21:12
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.557    06-02-1992   15:21:12
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.556    06-02-1992   15:21:12
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.555    06-03-1992   15:16:12
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.554    06-03-1992   15:16:12
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.562    06-03-1992   15:16:12
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.557    06-03-1992   15:16:12
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.430    06-04-1992   15:29:11
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.447    06-04-1992   15:29:11
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.441    06-04-1992   15:29:11
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.435    06-04-1992   15:29:11
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.471    06-04-1992   15:29:11
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.467    06-04-1992   15:29:11
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.470    06-05-1992   15:59:38
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.485    06-05-1992   15:59:38
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.474    06-05-1992   15:59:38
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.470    06-05-1992   15:59:38
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.470    06-06-1992   15:55:12
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.475    06-06-1992   15:55:12
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.482    06-06-1992   15:55:12
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.480    06-06-1992   15:55:12
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.298    06-06-1992   22:34:37
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.303    06-06-1992   22:34:37
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.312    06-07-1992   15:54:19
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.304    06-07-1992   15:54:19
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.315    06-07-1992   15:54:19
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.304    06-07-1992   15:54:19
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.322    06-08-1992   16:25:04
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.309    06-08-1992   16:25:04
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.320    06-08-1992   16:25:04
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.318    06-08-1992   16:25:04
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.367    06-09-1992   16:12:58
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.354    06-09-1992   16:12:58
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.361    06-09-1992   16:12:58
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.355    06-09-1992   16:12:58
  


LEG 4                              End    Thio-
  Mode       Butette Volumes       Volt   sulfate      Date        Time
  -----   ---------------------   ------  -------   ----------   --------
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.295    06-11-1992   00:29:30
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.344    06-11-1992   00:29:30
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.349    06-11-1992   00:29:30
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.343    06-11-1992   00:29:30
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0080   4.348    06-11-1992   17:13:07
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.345    06-11-1992   17:13:07
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.374    06-11-1992   17:13:07
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.367    06-11-1992   17:13:07
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.349    06-12-1992   16:58:25
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.339    06-12-1992   16:58:25
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.349    06-12-1992   16:58:25
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.325    06-12-1992   16:58:25
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.329    06-13-1992   17:04:21
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.341    06-13-1992   17:04:21
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.373    06-13-1992   17:04:21
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.359    06-13-1992   17:04:21
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.339    06-15-1992   17:54:48
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.339    06-15-1992   17:54:48
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.346    06-15-1992   17:54:48
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.340    06-15-1992   17:54:48
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0080   4.380    06-16-1992   21:18:41
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.369    06-16-1992   21:18:41
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.390    06-16-1992   21:18:41
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.370    06-16-1992   21:18:41
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.414    06-17-1992   17:58:38
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.400    06-17-1992   17:58:38
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.425    06-17-1992   17:58:38
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.414    06-17-1992   17:58:38
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.414    06-18-1992   18:21:00
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.424    06-18-1992   18:21:00
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0080   4.433    06-18-1992   18:21:00
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.425    06-18-1992   18:21:00
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.434    06-19-1992   18:37:07
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.425    06-19-1992   18:37:07
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.432    06-19-1992   18:37:07
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.425    06-19-1992   18:37:07
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.417    06-20-1992   19:00:19
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.422    06-20-1992   19:00:19
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.412    06-20-1992   19:00:19
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.419    06-21-1992   13:19:35
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.426    06-21-1992   13:19:35
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.416    06-21-1992   13:19:35
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.411    06-21-1992   13:19:35
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.388    06-22-1992   04:15:35
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.374    06-22-1992   04:15:35
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.396    06-22-1992   04:15:35
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.386    06-22-1992   04:15:35
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.393    06-23-1992   18:52:20
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.385    06-23-1992   18:52:20
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.392    06-23-1992   18:52:20
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.386    06-23-1992   18:52:20
  BLANK   15.000  49.971  0.991   0.975    0.0110   06-24-1992   05:32:46
  BLANK   15.000  49.971  0.987   0.973    0.0080   06-24-1992   05:49:07
  BLANK   15.000  49.971  0.984   0.973    0.0060   06-24-1992   05:52:10
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.407    06-24-1992   19:37:05
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.398    06-24-1992   19:37:05
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.404    06-24-1992   19:37:05
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.397    06-24-1992   19:37:05
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.399    06-25-1992   18:54:15
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0080   4.393    06-25-1992   18:54:15
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0080   4.404    06-25-1992   18:54:15
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0080   4.393    06-25-1992   18:54:15
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.396    06-26-1992   19:15:55
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.389    06-26-1992   19:15:55
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.401    06-26-1992   19:15:55
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.391    06-26-1992   19:15:55
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.336    06-27-1992   17:23:44
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.328    06-27-1992   17:23:44
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.338    06-27-1992   17:23:44
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.331    06-27-1992   17:23:44
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.319    06-28-1992   19:18:13
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.314    06-28-1992   19:18:13
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.324    06-28-1992   19:18:13
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.318    06-28-1992   19:18:13
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.322    06-30-1992   06:09:46
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.307    06-30-1992   06:09:46
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.313    06-30-1992   06:09:46
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.315    06-30-1992   06:09:46
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.354    07-01-1992   00:56:40
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.342    07-01-1992   00:56:40
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.350    07-01-1992   00:56:40
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.346    07-01-1992   00:56:40
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.369    07-01-1992   21:23:49
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.361    07-01-1992   21:23:49
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.376    07-01-1992   21:23:49
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.373    07-01-1992   21:23:49
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0080   4.382    07-01-1992   21:23:49
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.368    07-01-1992   21:23:49
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.382    07-01-1992   21:23:49
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.373    07-01-1992   21:23:49
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.393    07-02-1992   21:08:24
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.256    07-02-1992   21:08:24
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.385    07-02-1992   21:08:24
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.381    07-02-1992   21:08:24
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.388    07-02-1992   21:08:24
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.384    07-02-1992   21:08:24
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.441    07-03-1992   21:33:59
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.427    07-03-1992   21:33:59
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.441    07-03-1992   21:33:59
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.438    07-03-1992   21:33:59
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.445    07-03-1992   21:33:59
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.439    07-03-1992   21:33:59
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.439    07-04-1992   21:21:19
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.445    07-04-1992   21:21:19
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.458    07-04-1992   21:21:19
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.447    07-04-1992   21:21:19
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.456    07-04-1992   21:21:19
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.445    07-04-1992   21:21:19
  

LEG 5                              End    Thio-
  Mode       Butette Volumes       Volt   sulfate      Date        Time
  -----   ---------------------   ------  -------   ----------   --------
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.476    07-15-1992   02:40:49
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.477    07-15-1992   02:40:49
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.480    07-15-1992   02:40:49
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.471    07-15-1992   02:40:49
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0310   4.481    07-15-1992   19:18:51
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0310   4.480    07-15-1992   19:18:51
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.485    07-15-1992   19:18:51
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.479    07-15-1992   19:18:51
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0390   4.431    07-16-1992   07:54:28
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0310   4.429    07-16-1992   07:54:28
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.442    07-16-1992   07:54:28
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.430    07-16-1992   07:54:28
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0310   4.438    07-16-1992   18:51:31
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.437    07-16-1992   18:51:31
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.436    07-16-1992   18:51:31
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0310   4.428    07-16-1992   18:51:31
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.434    07-17-1992   19:34:54
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.433    07-17-1992   19:34:54
  BLANK   15.000  49.971  0.993   0.981    0.0050   07-17-1992   19:42:18
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.433    07-18-1992   04:00:41
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.431    07-18-1992   04:00:41
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0160   4.439    07-18-1992   04:00:41
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.432    07-18-1992   04:00:41
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0310   4.435    07-19-1992   19:59:27
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.437    07-19-1992   19:59:27
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.451    07-19-1992   19:59:27
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.438    07-19-1992   19:59:27
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.448    07-19-1992   19:59:27
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.438    07-19-1992   19:59:27
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0390   4.436    07-20-1992   20:26:32
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0310   4.434    07-20-1992   20:26:32
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0390   4.448    07-20-1992   20:26:32
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.440    07-20-1992   20:26:32
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.448    07-20-1992   20:26:32
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0230   4.439    07-20-1992   20:26:32
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0270   4.431    07-21-1992   17:56:58
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0200   4.425    07-21-1992   17:56:58
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0200   4.438    07-21-1992   17:56:58
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0200   4.426    07-21-1992   17:56:58
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0200   4.435    07-21-1992   17:56:58
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0200   4.424    07-21-1992   17:56:58
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0200   4.435    07-22-1992   17:42:02
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0200   4.431    07-22-1992   17:42:02
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0140   4.439    07-22-1992   17:42:02
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0200   4.434    07-22-1992   17:42:02
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0200   4.437    07-23-1992   18:00:09
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0200   4.427    07-23-1992   18:00:09
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0140   4.445    07-23-1992   18:00:09
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0140   4.433    07-23-1992   18:00:09
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0140   4.444    07-23-1992   18:00:09
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0140   4.434    07-23-1992   18:00:09
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0140   4.439    07-24-1992   18:07:43
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0140   4.438    07-24-1992   18:07:43
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0140   4.441    07-24-1992   18:07:43
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0140   4.438    07-24-1992   18:07:43
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0140   3.698    07-25-1992   18:24:21
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0270   4.435    07-25-1992   19:20:39
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0270   4.433    07-25-1992   19:20:39
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0200   4.440    07-25-1992   19:20:39
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0200   4.430    07-25-1992   19:20:39
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0140   4.351    07-26-1992   18:12:41
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0140   4.352    07-26-1992   18:12:41
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0140   4.362    07-26-1992   18:12:41
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0140   4.357    07-26-1992   18:12:41
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0140   4.364    07-26-1992   18:12:41
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0140   4.353    07-26-1992   18:12:41
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0140   4.356    07-27-1992   18:28:46
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0140   4.349    07-27-1992   18:28:46
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0140   4.357    07-27-1992   18:28:46
  STDZE   15.000  49.971  149.6   0.0140   4.352    07-27-1992   18:28:46
  


C.3.  WATER SAMPLE NUTRIENT DATA 
      (Joe Jennings)

ANALYSTS, EQUIPMENT AND TECHNIQUES

Nutrient analyses were performed by:

P06E: Andrew A. Ross and Hernan Garcia from the College of Oceanic and 
      Atmospheric Sciences at Oregon State University

P06C: Joe C. Jennings, Jr. from Oregon State University and Dennis Guffy of 
      Texas A&M University

P06W: Consuelo Carbonell-Moore and Joe C. Jennings, Jr. from Oregon State 
      University

The continuous flow analyzer used on all three legs of P06 was the Alpkem Rapid 
Flow Analyzer (RFA), model 300. A Keithley data acquisition system was used in 
parallel with analog stripchart recorders to acquire the absorbance data. The 
software used to process the nutrient data was developed by OSU. All of the 
reagent and standard materials were provided by OSU. The methods are described 
in Anonymous (1985) and in Gordon et. al. (in preparation, a & b).


SAMPLING PROCEDURES:

Nutrient samples were drawn from all CTD/rosette casts at stations 003 through 
072 leg3, 073 through 188 Leg4 and 189 through 257 Leg5. High density 
polyethylene (HDPE) bottles of approximately 30 ml volume were used as sample 
containers, and these same bottles were positioned directly in the autosampler 
tray. These sample tubes were routinely rinsed at least 3 times with one third 
to one half of their volume of sample before filling.

The nutrient samples were drawn following those for gases: Helium, tritium, 
dissolved oxygen and carbon dioxide. In some instances, the nutrient sampling 
procedure was not completed for almost 2 hours after the CTD arrived on deck. At 
most stations, the RFA was started before sampling was completed to reduce the 
delay and minimize possible changes in nutrient concentration due to biological 
processes. All analyses were accomplished within a few hours of the end of the 
CTD/rosette casts.


CALIBRATION AND STANDARDIZATION:

The volumetric flasks and pipettors used to prepare standards were 
gravimetrically calibrated prior to the cruise. The Eppindorf Maxipettor 
adjustable pipettors used to prepare mixed standards typically have a standard 
deviation of less than 0.002 ml on repeated deliveries of 10 ml volumes. High 
concentration mixed standards containing nitrate, phosphate, and silicic acid 
were prepared at intervals of 4 to 7 days and kept refrigerated in HDPE bottles. 
For almost every station, a fresh "working standard" was prepared by precise 
dilutions of 20 ml of the high concentration mixed standard to low nutrient 
seawater. This working standard has nutrient concentrations similar to those 
found in Deep and Bottom waters. A separate nitrite standard solution was also 
added to these working standards. Corrections for the actual volumes of the 
flasks and pipettors were included in the preliminary data.

The WOCE Operations Manual calls for nutrient concentrations to be reported in 
units of µmoles per kilogram (µmol/kg-1). Because the salinity information 
required to compute density is not usually available at the time of initial 
computation of the nutrient concentrations, our concentrations are always 
originally computed as µmoles per liter. This unit conversion will be made 
using the corrected salinity data when it is available.


EQUIPMENT AND ANALYTICAL PROBLEMS:

During the course of leg3, four series of standards with concentrations ranging 
from near zero to higher than any observed in the water column were run to check 
the linearity of the system response. On examining the results of these 
linearity checks, it became apparent that there was a significant nonlinearity 
present in the nitrate + nitrite channel. This nonlinearity arose from the 
inadvertent plumbing of the N + N channel according to the Alpkem manual and not 
according to the WOCE nutrient manual (Gordon et al., in preparation, a). The 
data from the P06E linearity checks allowed us to apply a post cruise correction 
to the reported nitrate data of the form,
 
                        Ccor = K1 * Crep + K2 * Crep2,

where Ccor is the corrected concentration and Crep is the concentration reported 
during the cruise. K1 and K2 are constants determined by fitting the first 
derivatives of the concentration versus absorbance curves and from the 
absorbances of the standards run at each station. The derivation of this formula 
depends upon the observation that a quadratic equation adequately fits the 
concentration vs. absorbance data for all of the nonlinear cases during P06E and 
the first two weeks of P06C.

This correction has been applied only to the nitrate + nitrite data. It does not 
apply to any of the remaining analyses, including silicic acid, which have been 
shown to be linear to within ca. 0.1% of full-scale concentration with the 
methods used on P06E (cf.  below and Gordon et al., in preparation, b).

At the start of P06C, the analysts ran additional standard curves to further 
document the extent of non-linearity, then made changes in the relative volumes 
of sample and buffer reagent used in the nitrate analysis to attempt to reduce 
this non-linearity. The first change to the nitrate pump tube configuration was 
made just prior to station 94. Standard curves were run to see how this change 
affected the linearity of the system response. The deviations from a linear 
response (residuals) were found to be smaller after the change in pump tubes, 
but still significant. A second change in pump tube sizes was made prior to 
station 112. Standard curves run with this configuration had residuals which 
were within the WOCE specifications for precision and accuracy, so this 
configuration was used for the remainder of the cruise. The pump tube 
configuration used on P06W was tested during and after the cruise and exhibited a 
linear response within WOCE specifications for precision and accuracy. No 
corrections to the reported nitrate data from P06W are necessary.

Phosphate phasing board failure: Starting at about station 150, the phosphate 
analytical channel began to experience increasing and irregular noise which 
resulted to decreased precision. This seemed to be electrical in origin, as 
routine replacement of the reagent chemicals and pump tubing did not resolve the 
problem. The major boards and components of the RFA used for the phosphate 
channel were systematically replaced wherever possible with limited and 
temporary success. During this period there were shipboard power failures which 
may have contributed to the RFA's electrical problem. Following station 171, the 
phosphate noise problems became so severe as to render the data unusable and no 
phosphate values were reported for the final 18 stations of this leg.

Because the phosphate analysis uses a flow cell with an optical path length 2 to 
3 times longer than the other analyses, it is particularly sensitive to any 
irregularities in the spacing of flow segmenting bubbles. Thus the air injection 
phasing board was the chief suspect. A replacement board was hand carried to 
Auckland, and it's installation fixed the problem on the following leg.


MEASUREMENT OF PRECISION AND BIAS:

SHORT TERM PRECISION AND BIAS:
Throughout the cruise, replicate samples drawn in different sample tubes from 
the same Niskin bottle were analyzed to assess the precision of the RFA 
analyses. These replicate samples were analyzed both as adjacent samples (one 
after the other) and also at the beginning and end of sample runs to monitor 
deterioration in the samples or uncompensated instrumental drift. Except for 
phosphate, there was no significant difference between the precisions determined 
for adjacent samples and samples run at the beginning and ending of a sample 
run. The mean drift for phosphate was 0.014 µmol/l per hour (Leg3), 0.030 
µmol/l per hour (Leg4) and -0.021 µmol/l per hour (Leg5). That for nitrate on 
Leg4 was 0.12 µmol/l per hour. These drifts represent an estimate of part of 
the systematic error in that method.

For the other measurements there was no significant difference in the analysis 
of replicates as adjacent sample s and those run at approximately one hour 
intervals. The mean standard deviations found for the replicate analyses provide 
a measure of short term, intra-station precision, in µmol/l:

Leg3 
  Phosphate: 0.005    Nitrate + Nitrite : 0.04
  Silicic acid: 0.13  Nitrite: 0.01

Leg4
  Phosphate: 0.013    Nitrate + Nitrite : 0.05
  Silicic acid: 0.20  Nitrite: 0.004

Leg5
  Phosphate: 0.016    Nitrate + Nitrite : 0.06
  Silicic acid: 0.16  Nitrite: 0.022 


LONGER TERM PRECISION:
On most of the sample runs during P06E, an "old" working standard from the 
previous station was run with the "new" working standard which had been freshly 
prepared. The "old" standards were kept refrigerated in plastic bottles. The 
average age of the "old" standards when reanalyzed was eight hours.

We calculated the difference in absorbance (peak height) between the last of the 
three new standards and the old standard which was run immediately after it. 
This difference, with regard to sign (new - old), was tabulated and a 
statistical analysis was done. The results were converted to concentration units 
by multiplying the difference by the mean sensitivity factor for each nutrient 
(Table 10). It appears that the phosphate and nitrate standard concentrations 
increased slightly over the eight hour storage period on Leg5. This may be 
equipment related rather than a function of storage. The silicic acid and 
nitrite standards appear to have stored well. On Leg4 the phosphate standard 
concentrations appear to have increased slightly over the eight hour storage 
period. This may be equipment related rather than a function of storage; as the 
silicic acid, nitrate, and nitrite standards appear to have stored well.

Leg3 differences between working standards at adjacent stations are shown in
Table 12. Differences are expressed as "new" standard minus "old", and are 
given in concentration units (µM).


TABLE 12:  Differences between working standards at adjacent stations for Leg3

    Phosphate  Nitrate  Silicic Acid  Nitrite    Mean, (µM) wrt sign
    ---------  -------  ------------  -------    --------------------
     -0.006    -0.01      -0.0014     -0.001        RMS Dev (µM) 
      0.016     0.065      0.18        0.007             n
     59        66         66          66
    
    
Leg4 Differences between working standards at adjacent stations are shown in 
Table 13. Differences are expressed as "new" standard minus "old", and are 
given in concentration units (µM).


TABLE 13:  Differences between working standards at adjacent stations for Leg4

    Phosphate  Nitrate  Silicic Acid  Nitrite    Mean, (µM) wrt sign
    ---------  -------  ------------  -------    --------------------
     -0.015    -0.0005    -0.09       -0.002        RMS Dev (µM) 
      0.015     0.098      0.23        0.020             n
     91       109        109         108
    
    
Leg5 Comparisons between stored and fresh working standards are shown in 
Table 14. Differences are expressed as "new" standard minus "old", and are 
given in concentration units (µM). 


TABLE 14:  Comparisons between stored and fresh working standards for Leg5

    Phosphate  Nitrate  Silicic Acid  Nitrite    Mean, (µM) wrt sign
    ---------  -------  ------------  -------    --------------------
     -0.015    -0.0005    -0.09       -0.002        RMS Dev (µM) 
      0.015     0.098      0.23        0.020             n
     91       109        109         108
    

COMPARISON WITH OTHER DATA, LONG TERM PRECISION AND BIAS.

P06E/P06C: 
  P06E ended with station 072, and P06C commenced with station 073. We plotted the 
  nutrients from stations 070 - 075 to check for consistency of the data from leg 
  to leg. The phosphate values at the first station of P06C (Station 073) are 
  somewhat higher than at the other stations, but there is no indication of a 
  systematic shift in any of the nutrients and the agreement between the two legs 
  is good.
  
P06E/P19C: 
  During the post-cruise QC work, additional preliminary data have become 
  available from the WOCE P19C cruise. A comparison of several stations nearest 
  the point where these two tracks cross indicates that the phosphate and nitrate 
  data agree well (using final P06E nitrate data), but that there is an offset in 
  the silicic acid data between the two cruises (see also Talley, 1993). Silicic 
  acid concentrations reported for the P06E stations are lower than those for P19C 
  by roughly 1 µM in the deep water (theta < 2.0~C). This is approximately the 
  magnitude of the correction term applied to the P19C data to account for 
  nonlinearity in the silicic acid response. However, for the RFA procedure used 
  on P06E, the maximum departure from a linear response in the concentration range 
  of interest is <0.1 µM. We conclude that nonlinearity of system response in the 
  RFA cannot account for the discrepancy in the silicic acid data.
  
P06E/P06C: 
  P06E ended with station 072, and P06C commenced with station 073. We plotted the 
  nutrients from stations 070 - 075 to check for consistency of the data from leg 
  to leg. The phosphate values at the first station of P06C (Stn 073) are somewhat 
  higher than at the other stations, but there is no indication of a systematic 
  shift in any of the nutrients and the agreement between the two legs is good.
  
P06C/P06W: 
  P06C ended with station 188, and P06W commenced with station 189. We compared the 
  nutrients from stations 180 through 198 to check for consistency of the data 
  from leg to leg. There are no phosphate values for the P06C stations, but there 
  is no indication of a systematic shift in the nutrient standards. The first 
  three stations of P06W agree with the final stations of P06C to within less than 
  1% of the deep nitrate and silicic acid concentrations. There is a greater total 
  range of nitrate concentrations in the nitrate/theta relationship in the first 
  10 stations of P06W (1.2 µmol/l) than in the final stations of P06C (0.5 
  µmol/l), but the mean values agree to within 0.2 µmol/l. The agreement 
  of the deep water silicic acid/theta relationship between the two legs is s 1.0 
  µmol/l where theta is less than 2xC.
    

NUTRIENT QUALITY CONTROL NOTES

During the cruise, a first pass quality control check on the nutrient data, 
primarily by comparing vertical profiles and nutrient/theta relationships. 
Following the cruise, all nutrient data were rechecked using log notes and the 
analog stripchart recordings made at sea and by examining parameter/parameter 
plots for outliers. Some correctable errors were found and the appropriate 
corrections made. The nitrate data were corrected for nonlinearity as described 
above. At this time, the data quality flags were edited to conform to the 
definitions in the WOCE Operations Manual (WOCE Report No. 67/91). Data quality 
flags were assigned as follows:


QUALITY BYTE DEFINITION

2: Acceptable measurement 
3: Questionable measurement; no obvious problems found, but data somewhat out of 
   trend. 
4: Bad measurement; known analytical problems or data seriously out of trend. 
5: Not reported. 
9: Sample not drawn, usually due to Niskin bottle failure

At several stations, the bottle tripping order was deliberately (or 
accidentally) different from 1-36.



C.4. CTD/O2 DATA
     (Sarah Zimmermann)

PRESSURE

Both CTD 9 and 10's pressure sensors, experienced a minor shift in bias between 
pre and post cruise calibrations. For each CTD, the pre and post cruise 
calibration data were combined and fit together to derive the final terms used 
to scale the cruise data. When the data was combined for the final fit, the CTD 
pressure bias of each calibration run was adjusted so that the initial reading 
at zero pressure matched the standard. This was done to be consistent with the 
processing of the at sea data where a station-dependent bias is applied.

The pressure bias at the sea surface at the beginning of each station was 
recorded and subtracted from the pressure bias term in each station's 
calibration file. This insures that the starting pressure value of each CTD time 
series begins at zero decibars when the instrument is on deck.

New pressure temperature S1 and S2 terms were calculated out at sea during Leg3 
for both CTDs 9 and 10. (These terms correct for the pressure sensor's bias and 
slope variations with temperature. See Millard et al., 1992). These terms were 
applied to all of the stations of P06.

The uptrace water sample file had incorrect pressure temperature data for Legs3 
and 4 due to a problem with the acquisition software. This problem was recognized 
and corrected on Leg3. In post-cruise processing, the incorrect pressure 
temperatures from Legs3 and 4 were replaced with the CTD uptrace temperature 
lagged by 20,000 scans (close to 13 minutes). This lag mimics the response 
behavior of the CTD's pressure temperature channel. In the calibration files for 
these stations, pressure temperature scaling parameters were replaced with 
temperature scaling parameters.


SUMMARY OF LABORATORY CALIBRATION FOR  CTD 10 AND 9

A quadratic relationship is used to convert raw CTD pressure data to engineering 
units:
                 P=bias + slope * Praw + quad * Praw2

TABLE 15:  Laboratory pressure calibrations for CTD 9 and 10

                            BIAS            SLOPE         QUADRATIC    
           -----------   -------------    ------------  -------------
           PRE-CRUISE             
             CTD10       -0.246449E0      0.100352E0    -0.294565E-8    
             CTD9         0.450652E0      0.100557E0     0.297377E-9    
           POST-CRUISE             
             CTD10       -0.139633E+01    0.100309E+00  -0.251698E-08    
             CTD9         0.365801E+01    0.100568E+00   0.405269E-09   
 
           PRE+POST COMBINED FOR FINAL TERMS            
             CTD10       -0.436677E+00    0.100333E+00  -0.276775E-08    
             CTD9        -0.338764E+00    0.100564E+00   0.338159E-09    

 
Following Millard et al. (1992) the slope and bias terms were adjusted for 
variation with temperature (static and dynamic). The coefficients used are given 
in Table 16.


TABLE 16:  New pressure terms for CTD 9 and 10

           CTD TEMP.    S1       S2     T0      D1       D2    D3
                     --------  ------  ----  --------  ------  --
           CTD 10    +2.71E-6  -0.054  21.8  -7.07E+1   2.468  0 
           CTD 9     +3.39E-6  +0.015  21.8  -2.28E-6  12.66   0 


Compared: Pressure computed with d1, and d2 set to the above terms or to zero. 
The two derived pressures were 1 dbar different; conclusion was it didn't really 
matter if the dynamic terms were applied or not. A summary of fits to the 
laboratory data for pressure are tabulated in Appendix C.


TEMPERATURE

Both CTD 9 and 10 have pre- and post-cruise temperature calibrations that show a 
shift has occurred in the sensors. With each CTD having been opened and sensor 
arms rotated to fit in a specific frame, the shift is not surprising. The fits 
look good although CTD 10's post cruise calibration fit has a higher standard 
deviation than it's pre cruise cal.

CTD10: 
  Temperature data scaled with the CTD 10 pre cruise calibration terms matches 
  quite closely the redundant temperature data scaled with its post cruise 
  calibration.
  
  Stations 64 to 75:  CTD - Red. Temperature = 3.3466E-04 
  Stations 86 to 94:  CTD - Red. Temperature = 6.8729E-04
  
  The difference changes by 0.0003 degrees. CTD10 failed and was opened to effect 
  repair after station 75 which could account for the change. The change however 
  is small enough to ignore. This relative consistency supports CTD10's pre cruise 
  calibration being applied to the all of CTD10's stations.
  
CTD9: 
  CTD9, the backup CTD was called into service at two different times. The first 
  time was for stations 76 through 85. Temperature data scaled with the CTD9 pre 
  cruise calibration terms compared to the neighboring CTD10 data with its pre 
  cruise calibration differ by 6.0131E-3, CTD9 is colder. For CTD9 data to match 
  CTD10 and the redundant temperature data, the bias in CTD9's scaling terms was 
  adjusted by this amount.
  
  In the second group, stations 248 through 267, CTD9 differs from the redundant 
  temperature by 1.77767E-02, CTD colder. The difference between CTD9's pre and 
  post cruise cal is 1.77E-02, CTD drifting colder. The difference between CTD9 
  being scaled with the corrected terms for stations 76 through 85, and the 
  post-cruise cal is 1.2012E-02. This indicates that the post cruise cal will be a 
  good one to use on the second set, stations 248 to 267, and that a bias 
  adjustment of 6E-3 to the pre cruise calibrations to scale the first set, is 
  appropriate.
  

TABLE 17:  Quadratic terms used to fit temperature calibrations 

                                BIAS           SLOPE          QUADRATIC 
      -----------  ------   -------------    ------------    ------------
      PRE-CRUISE   CTD 10    0.186416E-2     0.499864E-3     0.225955E-11 
                   CTD 9    -0.361583E-1     0.500248E-3     0.197920E-11 
      POST-CRUISE  CTD 10   -0.803350E-03    0.499708E-03    0.310515E-11     
                   CTD 9    -0.189004E-01    0.500366E-03    0.160650E-11 
      
      SCALING TERMS USED                    
      ALL STA      CTD 10    0.186416E-2     0.499864E-3     0.225955E-11 
      STA 76-85    CTD 9    -0.30145E-1      0.500248E-3     0.197920E-11 
      STA 248-267  CTD 9    -0.188737E-01    0.500365E-3     0.162401E-11
      -------------------------------------------------------------------
                CTD 9,10= temperature time lag of .25 seconds
      
      
Temperature lag checked for each CTD by plotting theta v. salinity and looking 
for consistent looping in the high gradient areas of the thermocline. Consistent 
looping, indicating density inversions, would be caused by an incorrect 
temperature lag. Minimal looping was found. Station plots that did show looping 
also had non uniform descent rates. The non uniform descent rate, probably due 
to the sea state, could have caused density inversions through changing the rate 
at which the large rosette package is pushing on the water below it. If the 
package is pushing a 'plug' of water below it, for the package to slow or stop 
then speed up again, the result may be that the package initially goes through 
the water it had been pushing before it, measuring water that would be less 
dense then the surrounding water, thus truly measuring a density inversion 
although it was created by the package. A summary of the temperature fits to the 
CTD laboratory data are given in Appendix D.


CONDUCTIVITY

The WHOI CTD Group conducts laboratory conductivity calibrations to check 
instrument functionality and to obtain initial scaling factors to relate 
instrument output to ocean conductivity. These are updated/refined/replaced with 
scalings based on water sample data and are tabulated in Appendix E. 

Procedure for fitting CTD salinities to water sample salinities

Basic fitting procedures followed that of Millard (1982) and Millard and Yang 
(1993). The process was initiated by taking a subset of stations having high-
quality water sample salinity data, 137 to 175, and refit comparing

(a) fitting for slope and bias, full depth

(b) fitting for slope using avg. of pre and post cruise bias, full depth

(c) fitting for slope using bias found in (a), with observations >1100 dbar

(d) fitting for slope using bias from (b), with observations >1100 dbar (a) 
    and (b) gave similar enough slopes and (c) and (d) were similar to both 
    (a) and (b).

As a result, we decided use the averaged pre and post cruise laboratory bias and 
fit throughout the cruise for conductivity slope using the water sample data. We 
further concluded that the nominal coefficient for conductivity cell distortion 
under pressure of beta=1.5E-8 gave acceptable results in the deep ocean (where 
this term has the most noticeable effect). Final fits are tabulated in Appendix F.

However, careful examination of the CTD - water sample conductivity data from 
the thermocline revealed several irregularities e.g., curvature of the CTD-water 
sample residuals in pressure and temperature. Several non-standard procedures 
were implemented in order that the final calibrated CTD salinity downcasts were 
consistent with the water sample salinity data. In addition to altering alpha, 
the coefficient of thermal expansion of conductivity cell, from its nominal 
value of -6.5E-6, an empirical correction to the conductivities in the upper 
third of the ocean was implemented in order that the derived CTD salinity data 
agreed with the water samples. The correction was, as stated, done to the raw 
CTD conductivity data, although it may have been equivalently applied to the CTD 
temperature. The small magnitude of the shift (around 0.002 psu) was such that 
we could not distinguish. It is suspicious that the empirical correction was 
needed for CTD stations collected with instrument No. 10 after it had failed on 
Leg4 and been opened for repair. This hints that it may have been a temperature 
shift. However, as the error signal was detected in salinity, we decided to 
alter conductivity.


SUMMARY OF NON-STANDARD CORRECTIONS TO CONDUCTIVITY:

CTD No.10

Station 1 to 75, 86 to 247 reduced alpha by half in conductivity to increase 
  surface CTD salt by 0.002 psu at 0 db. This was done to straighten out hooked 
  profile of salinity residuals plotted against pressure. Changed alpha for all 
  CTD 10 stations so that alpha was consistent for CTD 10 throughout cruise. 
  Alpha = -3.25E-6 for all CTD 10 stations.

Station 86 to 246 added an empirically determined conductivity offset (which
  was a function of pressure) to the downcast CTD conductivity profile data and 
  the upcast data collected at the time of water bottle tripping. The offset C-
  off was of the form:

                 C-off = 1.47781E-8 *{P**2} * exp{-[P/500]}

The offset was thus zero at the surface, approached zero exponentially at depth 
and had a maximum effect of 0.002 mmho at 1000 dbars.

Station 76 to 85 CTD 9 alpha was increased above the nominal value to reduce
  surface CTD salt. Alpha set to -16.25E-6.

Station 249 to 267 CTD9 the nominal alpha of -6.5E-6 was employed successfully   
  for these data. It is not known why a different value from the earlier station    
  group worked.

Given these shaping parameters, conductivity slope factors were derived by 
regression against the water sample data following standard procedures. 
Conductivity fits applied to the final CTD data are tabulated in Appendix F.


CTD OXYGEN MEASUREMENTS

Leg3, stations 4 to 72, CTD 10 used a pump in conjunction with the oxygen 
sensor. As noted above in C.1 General Information, the data collected with the 
pump was difficult to process. Specifically, the top 500 meters of oxygen 
current were very noisy and very difficult to fit. A nonstandard method of 
fitting the top water (0 to 1000db) and bottom water (1000db to bottom) 
separately was used. The resulting deep CTD oxygen has a good fit, similar to 
the following legs. An advantage of using the pump was the station bottoms 
lacked the typical oxygen tail seen in legs 4 and 5, where the oxygen drifted 
low due, most likely, to the slowing of the package as it neared the bottom. The 
pump might have kept the water flow rate past the oxygen sensor constant, thus 
not artificially lowering the oxygen current. As well there were the usual 
difficulties processing data from this sensor. See Owens and Millard (1985) for 
details to the algorithm.


QUALITY CONTROL OF 2-DBAR CTD DATA

QC SALTS:  
  Salinity spikes on or near sea surface were not uncommon. Guideline for quality 
  marking: If the spike is greater than .2 mark the quality word as bad. For 
  spikes smaller than .2 mark quality word as questionable. Don't mark if spike is 
  substantiated by water samples (see station 55). The spike might not be marked 
  questionable if it looks real such as a small spike to the fresh side, that 
  changes with temperature as well as salinity. Causes: As package enters water it 
  is possible the pressure averaging for the first three dbrs. is incorporating 
  conductivity data from above and below the water surface causing large salt 
  spikes.
  
OXYGENS: 
  Surface spikes, were the norm for the entire cruise. These were neither 
  individually identified nor the quality word labeled.
  
Noisy data in top 500 dbar for all CTD10 stations on Leg3 associated with use of 
oxygen pump. Leg3 variability on the order of =/-0.2 ml/l. Leg4 and 5 
variability on the order of =/-0.05 ml/l.  Bottom tails, where oxygen is drifts 
off low are common in Legs 4 and 5. Likely due to the slowing descent
rate of the CTD as it approaches the bottom. The reduced flow past the oxygen 
sensor results in a lower oxygen current and thus lower oxygen value.



D.  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS


E.  REFERENCES

Anonymous. 1985. RFA-300 Rapid Flow Analyzer Operation Manual. Preliminary.  
   Alpkem Corporation, Clackamas, Oregon. Loose-leaf binder, unnumbered pages.

Gordon, L.I., J.C. Jennings, Jr., A.A. Ross and J.M. Krest. In preparation, a. A 
   suggested protocol for continuous flow automated analysis of seawater 
nutrients (phosphate, nitrate, nitrite and silicic acid) in the WOCE 
   Hydrographic Program and the Joint Global Ocean Fluxes Study. 

Gordon, L. I., J. Krest, and A. Ross, in preparation, b. Reducing temperature 
   sensitivity in continuous flow analysis of silicic acid in seawater.

Knapp, G.P., M.C. Stalcup, and R.J. Stanley. 1990. Automated Oxygen and Salinity 
   Determination. WHOI Technical Report No. WHOI-90-35. 25 pp.

Millard, R.C., Jr. 1982. CTD calibration and data processing techniques at WHOI 
   using the 1987 practical salinity scale. Marine Technology Society Conference 
   paper.

Millard, R., G. Bond and J. Toole, 1992. Implementation of a titanium strain 
   gauge pressure transducer for CTD applications. Deep-Sea Res., 1009-1021. 

Millard, R.C. and K. Yang, 1993. CTD calibration and processing methods used at 
   Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. WHOI Tech. Report No. 93-44. 95 pgs.

Owens, W.B. and R.C. Millard, Jr., 1985. A new algorithm for CTD oxygen 
   calibration. J. Phys. Oc. 15, 621-631.

Talley, L. 1993. Cruise Report - WOCE P19C. Submitted to the US WHP Office. 6 
   pages plus appendices and figures. unpublished.

UNESCO, 1983. International Oceanographic tables. UNESCO Technical Papers in 
   Marine Science, No. 44.

UNESCO, 1991. Processing of Oceanographic Station Data, 1991. By JPOTS editorial 
   panel.
      

____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
      

C.5. FINAL REPORT FOR AMS 14-C SAMPLES (WOCE P06)
     (Robert M. Key}
     July 9, 1996


1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

WOCE P06 was a zonal section consisting of three cruise legs which are 
treated collectively here. The legs were carried out on R/V Knorr and 
have the cruise designation 316N138_3, /4 and /5 or P06E, P06C and P06W. 
Dates, port stops, chief scientists and station numbers are summarized 
in Table 1. This report covers details of the small volume radio-carbon
samples. The reader is referred to cruise documentation provided by the 
individual chief scientists as the primary source for cruise 
information. Of 267 stations, 30 were sampled for radiocarbon. 
Unfortunately, station 3, which was sampled and has had 14-C analysis
completed, has yet to be reported in any hydrographic data report. 
Consequently, that station is omitted from this report. The AMS station 
locations are shown in Figure 1* and summarized in Table 2.


TABLE 1:  P06 Leg Summary

Leg   WOCE ID    Chief Sci.    Dates           Ports                       Stations
---   ---------  ------------  --------------  --------------------------  --------
P06E  316N138_3  H. Bryden     05/02-05/26/92  Valparaiso - Easter Island  1-72
P06C  316N138_4  M. McCartney  05/30-07/07/92  Easter Island - Papeete     73-188
P06W  316N138_5  J. Toole      07/13-07/30/92  Papeete - Sydney            189-267


TABLE 2:  P06 AMS Station Data

              Sta.  Date                       Bottom 
              Sta.  1992  Latitude  Longitude  Depth (m)
              ----  ----  -------   ---------  ---------
              17    5/7   -32.500   -76.002     4170
              24    5/10  -32.500   -80.665     3920
              44    5/16  -32.503   -94.001     3935
              54    5/19  -32.499   -100.666    3523
              69    5/23  -32.500   -110.667    3005
              77    6/2   -32.500   -114.668    2925
              85    6/4   -32.501   -119.992    3161
              97    6/7   -32.501   -128.001    4020
              100   6/8   -32.501   -130.001    4086
              108   6/11  -32.501   -135.335    4330
              115   6/14  -32.433   -139.997    4733
              121   6/16  -32.506   -144.831    5289
              127   6/19  -32.501   -149.827    5088
              133   6/20  -32.503   -154.842    5007
              140   6/23  -32.495   -160.494    5521
              148   6/25  -32.500   -165.166    6329
              157   6/27  -32.492   -169.845    5601
              165   6/29  -32.499   -173.173    5827
              171   7/1   -32.501   -175.750    5868
              175   7/2   -32.500   -177.667    7310
              179   7/3   -32.499   -178.648    3455
              182   7/3   -32.500   -180.082    2914
              194   7/15  -30.081   -184.832    4136
              205   7/17  -30.080   -190.003    2945
              210   7/18  -30.082   -192.502    1305
              214   7/19  -30.077   -194.592    3374
              229   7/22  -30.085   -201.999    2015
              234   7/23  -30.083   -203.470    4821
              239   7/24  -30.085   -205.837    4590
              
Unlike most of the Pacific meridional sections, on which AMS sampling 
was used for the upper thermocline and large volume sampling for the 
deep and bottom waters, all sampling was via AMS with approximately 
every third station being full water column and the others being upper 
thermocline only.



2.0 PERSONNEL

14-C sampling for this cruise was carried out by R. Rotter (P06E) and G. 
McDonald (P06C & P06W), both from Princeton U.  14-C analyses were 
performed at the National Ocean Sciences AMS Facility (NOSAMS) at Woods 
Hole Oceanographic Institution.  Salinities and nutrients were analyzed 
by the WHOI CTD group and the Oregon State Univ. group respectively. R. 
Key (Princeton) collected the data from the originators, merged the 
files, assigned quality control flags to the 14-C and submitted the data 
files to the WOCE office (7/96).  Key is PI for these 14-C data.



3.0 RESULTS

This 14-C data set and any changes or additions supersedes any prior 
release.


3.1 HYDROGRAPHY

Hydrography from these legs (with the exception noted above) have been 
submitted to the WOCE office by the chief scientists and described in 
the final hydrographic reports.


3.2 14-C

Most of the delta-14-C values reported here have been distributed in a 
data report (NOSAMS, 1994, 1995).  That report included preliminary 
hydrographic data and 14-C results which had not been through the WOCE 
quality control procedures.  This report supersedes those data 
distributions.

At this time 649 of 1089 samples have been measured and reported. 
Replicate measurements have been made on 17 of the water samples.  These 
replicate analyses are tabulated in Table 3. The table shows the mean 
and standard deviation for each set of replicates.  For these few 
samples, the average standard deviation is 6.8 ‰.  This precision 
estimate is approximately correct for the time frame over which these 
samples were measured.  For a summary of the improvement in precision 
with time at NOSAMS, see Key, et al. (1996).  Note that the errors given 
in Table 3 and in the final data report include only counting errors, 
and errors due to blanks and backgrounds.  The 5-7 ‰ error obtained 
for replicate analysis is an estimate of the true error which includes 
errors due to sample collection, sample degassing, etc.  In the final 
data reported to the WOCE office, the error weighted mean and error 
weighted standard deviation of the mean are given for replicate 
analyses.


TABLE 3:  Summary of Replicate Analyses

            Sta-Cast-                             Standard 
            Bottle      delC14   Err    Mean-*a   Deviation-*b
            ---------   ------   ---    -------   ------------
            97-1-9      -205.9   3.2
                        -208.4   5.1    -208.7     2.2
                        -211.1   3.9
                        -209.4   5.1
            97-1-13     -224.1   5.5
                        -208.2   3.2    -220.5     9.2
                        -229.8   4.9
                        -219.7   4.2
            97-1-14     -214.9   3.5
                        -214.3   4.2    -213.3     6.2
                        -204.7   4.4
                        -219.4   7.8
            97-1-31      130.7   3.2
                         133.6   6.0     131.4     1.9
                         130.0   6.6
            97-1-32      116.5   3.9
                         128.3   5.2     123.8     6.4
                         126.7   5.2
            97-1-33      129.5   3.2
                         123.6   4.4     126.5     3.0
                         126.5   7.5
            127-1-13    -235.6   5.5    -231.7     5.5
                        -227.8   4.5
            127-1-17    -189.2   3.1    -211.0    30.8
                        -232.8   7.0
            127-1-20    -147.8   2.8    -150.2     3.4
                        -152.6   4.2
            127-1-23     -83.5   3.1     -88.5     7.1
                         -93.5   9.7
            127-1-24     -56.5   3.9     -57.3     1.1
                         -58.0   4.2
            148-1-16    -199.3   2.6    -198.6     1.0
                        -197.9   4.9
            148-1-21    -223.6   3.3    -227.4     5.4
                        -231.2   9.0
            148-1-27-*c  -79.3   2.9     -89.7    14.6
                        -100.0   3.6
            157-1-28     -17.3   6.5     -22.5     7.4
                         -27.7   8.5
            182-1-31      65.1   3.6      68.0     4.0
                          70.8   5.5
            210-1-1     -149.2   2.9    -148.7     0.7
                        -148.2   3.6
            --------------------------------------------------
            *a. Error weighted mean reported with data set
            *b. Error weighted standard deviation of the mean reported with data set.
            *c. Only first value reported in final data set



4.0 QUALITY CONTROL FLAG ASSIGNMENT

Quality flag values were assigned to all 14-C measurements using the 
code defined in Table 0.2 of WHP Office Report WHPO 91-1 Rev. 2 section 
4.5.2.   Measurement flags values of 2, 3, 4, 6 and 9 have been assigned 
to date.  Approximately 400 samples remain to be measured. With a few 
exceptions, these samples will be completed.  Currently, the unmeasured 
samples are incorrectly coded with a flag value of 9 (no sample 
collected) rather than 1 (sample collected) or 5 (no result reported). 
The choice between values 2 (good), 3 (questionable) or 4 (bad) is 
involves some interpretation.  There is very little overlap between this 
data set and any existing 14-C data, so that type of comparison was 
difficult.  In general the lack of other data for comparison led to a 
more lenient grading on the 14-C data.

When using this data set for scientific application, any 14-C datum 
which is flagged with a "3" should be carefully considered.  My 
subjective opinion is that any datum flagged "4" should be disregarded. 
When flagging 14-C data, the measurement error was taken into 
consideration.  That is, approximately one-third of the 14-C 
measurements are expected to deviate from the true value by more than 
the measurement precision.  No measured values have been removed from 
this data set.

Table 4 summarizes the quality control flags assigned thus far to this 
data set.  For a detailed description of the flagging procedure see Key, 
et al. (1996).  As more of the Pacific data set becomes available, it is 
possible that some of these flag values may be modified.  Any additional 
data received for this leg will be reported to the WOCE office as they 
become available.


TABLE 4: Summary of Assigned Quality Control Flags

                                Flag  Number
                                ----  ------
                                 2     646
                                 3      10
                                 4       6
                                 6      17



5.0 DATA SUMMARY
    (Figures available in PDF version)

Figures 2-5* summarize the AMS 14-C data collected on this leg.  Only delta-
14-C measurements with a quality flag value of 2 or 6 are included in 
each figure.  Figure 2* shows the delta-14-C values with 2-sigma error 
bars plotted as a function of pressure.  The data density in this figure 
is representative for these legs: approximately 3 times as many samples 
were collected in the thermocline as in deep and bottom waters.  The 
mid-depth delta-14-C minimum at approximately 2500 meters is clearly 
evident.  Figure 3* shows the delta-14-C values plotted against silicate. 
The straight line shown in the figure is the least squares regression 
relationship derived by Broecker et al. (1995) based on the GEOSECS 
global data set.  According to their analysis, this line (delta-14-C=
-70-Si) represents the relationship between naturally occurring 
radiocarbon and silicate for most of the ocean.  They interpret 
deviations in delta-14-C above this line to be due to input of bomb-
produced radiocarbon.  Clearly, this relationship is not ideal for the 
P06 data set.  The data points having silicate values greater than or 
equal to 60 µmol/kg almost certainly have no bomb-radiocarbon component 
and should therefore lie on, rather than below, the line as seen in 
Figure 3*.  For these data the slope of the line needs to be steeper 
or/and the intercept needs to be lower.  Also strongly diverging from 
the trend are one group of points having silicate concentrations between 
105 - 125 µmol/kg.  These data are from the near-bottom water at stations 
between approximately 160°W and 180°W; that is, some form of northward 
flowing circumpolar bottom water.  For silicate values greater than 
approximately 40 µmol/kg the shape of the delta-14-C vs. Si trend is 
better described as a backward "J" which is rotated counter-clockwise.


Figure 2*: AMS delta-14-C results for P06 stations shown with 2-sigma 
           error bars.  Only those measurements having a quality control 
           flag value of 2 are plotted.


Essentially all of the deep and bottom waters in the South Pacific 
examined during WOCE shown this same shape.  The shape is, of course due 
to the fact that the delta-14-C and Si extreme fall at different depths 
and have similar, but different ratios on either side of the extrema.  
If one follows Broecker's argument, but modifies it so that only data 
which have no tritium and are above the shallower of the Si and delta-
14-C extrema, one should still be able to get an estimate of the pre-
bomb radiocarbon.  To that end (and erring on the safe side), a least 
squares fit of the data from samples between 1 and 2 km depth (n=141; 
R^2 =.91) gives an intercept of -63±3 and an intercept value of -
1.34±.03 both of which are significantly different than the -70, -1 
which Broecker calculated for the GEOSECS global data set.

Figure 4* is an objectively contoured section (LeTraon, 1990) of the 
delta-14-C distribution for the upper 1.5 kilometer of the water column 
The most prominent features of this section are the general upward tilt 
of the isopleths eastward of 120°W and the sharp upturn of the isopleths 
in the 250-750 meter depth range just off South America.  This second 
trait is probably due to upwelling and is reflected in the low surface 
concentrations on the east end of the section.  At this point, the 
upward slope of the deeper isopleths is interpreted as a shallow 
indication of the deeper southward flow at the eastern side of the 
section.  Figure 5* shows the entire section contoured.  Both Figure 4* 
and Figure 5* were gridded using the method of LeTraon (1990), however, 
the horizontal correlation length scale used for Figure 5* was 2.5 times 
that used for Figure 4* to compensate for the sparser sampling in
the deep and bottom water (i.e., the full water column section was 
significantly smoothed relative to the first). The delta-14-C minimum 
centered around 2500m depth is definitely not continuous across the 
section.  The break in the minimum at 260° (100°W) is reflected in other 
tracers and is indicative of northward flow along the east side of the 
ridge.


Figure 3*: delta-14-C as a function of silicate for P06 AMS samples.  The 
           straight line shows the relationship proposed by Broecker, et al., 
           1995 (delta-14-C = -70-Si with radiocarbon in ‰ and silicate in 
           µmol/kg).

Figure 4*: delta-14-C concentration in the upper kilometer of TUNES leg 3; 
           WOCE line P06) along 155°W.  Gridding done using the method of 
           Letraon (1990); all samples measured using the AMS technique 
           (Key, 1996a,b; Key, et al., 1996). For most of the section the 
           maximum concentration is found below the surface.

Figure 5*: delta-14-C contour of WOCE section P06 at approximately 32°S. 
           Longitudes are east of Greenich.  Objective gridding done using the 
           LeTraon (1990) method with a relative long horizontal correlation 
           length scale. The samples in the near bottom water mass centered on 
           190° and having relatively low delta-14-C are those which fall above 
           the general deep water trend in Figure 3*.


The minimum layer has 2 cores centered on 210° and 280°.  Both are 
interpreted as southward flow of "old" water from farther north.  The 
core which is against South America was completely missed by GEOSECS due 
to lack of coverage during that program.  At this point it is not clear 
whether the eastern core represents a return flow from the North Pacific 
or simply return flow of waters which have remained in the South 
Pacific.


5.1 REFERENCES AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

Key, R.M., WOCE radiocarbon program reports progress, WOCE Notes, 
    8(1),12-17, 1996

Key, R.M., WOCE Pacific Ocean radiocarbon program, Radiocarbon, 
    submitted, 1996.

Key, R.M., P.D. Quay and NOSAMS, WOCE AMS Radiocarbon I: Pacific Ocean 
    results; P06, P16 & P17, Radiocarbon, submitted, 1996.

LeTraon, P.Y., A method for optimal analysis of fields with spatially 
    variable mean, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 13543-13547, 1990.

NOSAMS, National Ocean Sciences AMS Facility Data Report #94-092, Woods 
    Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, 02543, 1994.

NOSAMS, National Ocean Sciences AMS Facility Data Report #95-052, Woods 
    Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, 02543, 1995.



C.6.  STATION LOG

Leg3: Aqui89 troubles from the start of leg3. Code got corrupted and was 
      scrambling the last three parameters (TP,TR,RT). Plotting of extra 
      variables and derived parameters was demonic. Test station 999 and 998, 
      and station 1 were acquired with this corrupt code. A backup AQUI89 tape 
      from July 1991 was restored to the MicroVAX and station 2 was acquired 
      with this code.

      Data clean. Plotting spikes for TE variable. Station 1 was replayed from audio 
      tape with this old code.
      
      Logging in parallel to PC, stations 999,998,1-3,5-7,9-12.E.     



D. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS



E. REFERENCES

Anonymous. 1985. RFA-300 Rapid Flow Analyzer Operation Manual.
    Preliminary. Alpkem Corporation, Clackamas, Oregon. Looseleaf binder,
    unnumbered pages.
Gordon, L.I., J.C. Jennings, Jr., A.A. Ross and J.M. Krest. In preparation, a. A
    suggested protocol for continuous flow automated analysis of seawater
    nutrients (phosphate,nitrate, nitrite and silicic acid) in the WOCE
    Hydrographic Program and the Joint Global Ocean Fluxes Study.
Gordon, L. I., J. Krest, and A. Ross, in preparation, b. Reducing temperature
    sensitivity in continuous flow analysis of silicic acid in seawater.
Knapp, G.P., M.C. Stalcup, and R.J. Stanley. 1990. Automated Oxygen and
    Salinity Determination. WHOI Technical Report No. WHOI-90-35. 25 pp.
Millard, R.C., Jr. 1982. CTD calibratiron and data processing techniques at WHOI
    using the 1987 practical salinity scale. Marine Technology Society
    Conference paper.
Millard, R., G. Bond and J. Toole, 1992. Implementation of a titanium strain
    gauge pressure transducer for CTD applications. Deep-Sea Res., 1009-
    1021.
Millard, R.C. and K. Yang, 1993. CTD calibreation and processing methods used
    at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. WHOI Tech. Report No. 93-44. 95
    pgs.
Owens, W.B. and R.C. Millard, Jr., 1985. A new algorithm for CTD oxygen
    calibration. J. Phys. Oc. 15, 621-631.
Talley, L. 1993. Cruise Report - WOCE P19C. Submitted to the US WHP Office.
    6 pages plus appendices and figures. unpublished.
Unesco, 1983. International Oceanographic tables. Unesco Technical Papers in
    Marine Science, No. 44.
Unesco, 1991. Processing of Oceanographic Station Data, 1991. By JPOTS
    editorial panel.



F.  WHPO SUMMARY

Several data files are associated with this report. They are the p6c.sum/ 
p6w.sum/p6e.sum, p6c.hyd/p6w.hyd/p6e.hyd, p6.csl and *.wct files. The p6c.sum/ 
p6w.sum/p6e.sum files contains a summary of the location, time, type of 
parameters sampled, and other pertinent information regarding each hydrographic 
station. The p6c.hyd/p6w.hyd/p6e.hyd file contains the bottle data. The *.wct 
files are the ctd data for each station. The *.wct files are zipped into one 
file called p6awct.zip/p6bwct.zip/p6cwct.zip /p6dwct.zip/p6ewct.zip . The p6.csl 
file is a listing of ctd and calculated values at standard levels.

The following is a description of how the standard levels and calculated values 
were derived for the p6.csl file:

Salinity, Temperature and Pressure: These three values were smoothed using the 
following binomial filter-

         t(j) = 0.25ti(j-1) + 0.5ti(j) + 0.25ti(j+1) j=2....N-1

When a pressure level is represented in the *.csl file that is not contained 
within the ctd values, the value was linearly interpolated to the desired level 
after applying the binomial filtering.  

Sigma-theta(SIG-TH:KG/M3), Sigma-2 (SIG-2: KG/M3), and Sigma-4(SIG-4: KG/M3): 
These values are calculated using the practical salinity scale (PSS-78) and the 
international equation of state for seawater (EOS-80) as described in the UNESCO 
publication 44 at reference pressures of the surface for SIG-TH; 2000 dbars for 
Sigma-2; and 4000 dbars for Sigma-4.

Gradient Potential Temperature (GRD-PT: C/DB 10-3) is calculated as the least 
squares slope between two levels, where the standard level is the center of the 
interval. The interval being the smallest of the two differences between the 
standard level and the two closest values. The slope is first determined using 
CTD temperature and then the adiabatic lapse rate is subtracted to obtain the 
gradient potential temperature. Equations and Fortran routines are described in 
UNESCO publication 44.

Gradient Salinity (GRD-S: 1/DB 10-3) is calculated as the least squares slope 
between two levels, where the standard level is the center of the standard level 
and the two closes values. Equations and Fortran routines are described in 
UNESCO publication 44.

Potential Vorticity (POT-V: 1/ms 10-11) is calculated as the vertical component 
ignoring contributions due to relative vorticity, i.e. pv=fN2/g, where f is the 
coriolius parameter, N is the buoyancy frequency (data expressed as radius/sec), 
and g is the local acceleration of gravity. 

Buoyancy Frequency (B-V: cph) is calculated using the adiabatic leveling method, 
Fofonoff (1985) and Millard, Owens and Fofonoff (1990). Equations and Fortran 
routines are described in UNESCO publication 44.

Potential Energy (PE: J/M2: 10-5) and Dynamic Height (DYN-HT: M) are calculated 
by integrating from 0 to the level of interest. A constant value of specific 
volume anomaly is assumed. equations and Fortran routines are described in 
UNESCO publication, Processing of Oceanographic station data.

Neutral Density (GAMMA-N: KG/M3) is calculated with the program GAMMA-N (Jackett 
and McDougall) version 1.3 Nov. 94. 


____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
      

G.   DATA QUALITY EVALUATION

G.1. DQE OF WOCE P06C HYDROGRAPHIC DATA
     (A. Mantyla)

WOCE P06C is the second leg of three done along about 32S in the South Pacific. 
The cruise crossed the Southwest Pacific Basins occupying stations from the East 
Pacific Rise ridgecrest to the Kermadec Islands. Comparisons with nearby high 
resolution stations from GEOSECS, TUNES and JUNO were reasonably good. Overall, 
this cruise will be a very nice addition to the Pacific deep data set array. 
However, there is room for some improvement.

Many of the problem areas noted on the P06E leg persisted into this one (see 
general comments from the P06E DQE report for more detailed remarks). Rosette 
trip errors were less frequent on this leg, but sampling errors appeared to 
happen fairly often. Much of the oxygen or salinity data that was flagged as 
questionable appeared to be samples that were drawn a depth or two off 
(according to the CTD trace). Those mostly were not rosette trip errors because 
they occurred in isolated parameters, rather than in all of the samples listed 
for a specific bottle. A couple of examples are mentioned below, but most have 
been properly flagged as doubtful data. The nutrient data set suffered by the 
loss of the phosphate for the last 17 stations. Given a choice, I would have 
preferred to have lost the nitrite channel.

There were a number of unintended double trips, as shown by the wider than 
normal depth spacing adjacent to the double trips and by the lack of actual CTDO 
data for the second data listing (ditto marks could have been used). The double 
trips are fairly obvious and are easy to sort out, but the mis-trips often start 
at a bottle or two earlier than the obvious pair. I've pointed out some possible 
cases below that need to be resolved. Those mis-trips would be easier to 
determine if the CTD information at each intended trip depth were retained in 
the .sea files, it would also improve the profiles if some data were listed for 
the depth gaps.

The .sum files were more complete on this leg and I didn't see any obvious 
goofs. However, they need to have position data added for the down and up times, 
if for no other reason than to show how meaningless the second decimal place is. 
Bottom soundings are also needed, preferably for the cast down time.



COMMENTS ON SPECIFIC STATIONS:

Stations 73 and 74: Data not provided, stations apparently a re-occupation of 
  station 72 from the previous leg. Might have been useful to assess measurement 
  consistency between the two legs.

Station 79, 1964db: Salinity sample apparently not drawn. It is important to 
  draw salts from all rosette bottles, as salinity compared to the CTD is the  
  most sensitive verification available on the correct tripping of the rosette 
  bottles. Oxygen samples can help, but at this depth, the CTD O2 value was 
  flagged doubtful. Although the other water sample data appears to be ok, there 
  is no actual verification of that assumption.

Station 80, btl. 24: Oxygen close to 1.00 ml/l too high. Could it be a typo or 
  transposition of the first 2 figures? Would be ok if so, otherwise flag it 
  questionable.

Station 81, btls. 7 and 8: From comparison with the adjacent station profiles, 
  the nutrient samples appear to have been reversed. Most obvious is silicate, 
  phosphate and nitrate gradient is small and there- fore inconclusive. Only 
  bottle 7 flagged doubtful, but bottle 8 should be also.

Station 89, btl. 20: A good example of an obvious leaker where the oxygen 
  appears to be ok, compared to the CTD O2 profile (offset to the adjacent 
  bottle). However, the mean of the overlaying O2 samples happens to be 
  essentially the same as the O2 at this level, 5.22 vs. 5.23 ml/., about the 
  value expected. The O2 should be flagged doubtful also.

  This station is only about 2300m deep in a region uncharted by GEBCO, but 
  expected to be generally deeper. The unexpected bathymetry could have odd 
  effects on the water above, as suggested by the wavy temperature profile and 
  bumpy O2 and silica profiles. Four of the silicates were flagged doubtful, but 
  unless there is some analytical reason for doing so, I would prefer to accept 
  them as ok.

Station 90, btls. 35 and 36: The two surface salinity samples are obviously 
  listed in reverse order, most likely due to a sample collection error. They 
  are unstable as listed, and the CTD values are correct. An increase in 
  salinity in the top 2 depths is required to balance the temperature inversion. 
  Unless a reason can be found to reverse the bottle salts, I recommend calling 
  the CTD salts ok, and the bottle salts doubtful. Should have a little more 
  faith in the CTD data.

Several other salts on this station seem to be poorly collected, and the O2's at 
  1420 and 1520db could be reversed, but can't be sure. Deeper one flagged.

Station 95: Obvious trip problems (and possible sampling errors). As indicated 
  by bottle 1 listed between 24 and 25; 3 samples listed at 1880db; and 4 depth 
  gaps: near 800, 1420, 1800, and 2290db. The salinity data appear to confirm 
  the present trip levels, but the oxygen and silicate data do not confirm 3 
  trips at 1880db. Therefore the most likely scenario suggests that bottle 8 and 
  9 salts were collected from bottle 7; the O2 and nutrient data would match the 
  adjacent station profiles if samples 8-13 were moved up one level, including 
  the missing depths at about 1800 and 1420 db also. Finally, the O2's at bottle 
  14 and 15 appear to belong one depth deeper. Considering all of the 
  uncertainty above, I have flagged the O2's for bottles 8-15 and all of the 
  nutrients for bottles 8-13 questionable.

Station 97, btl. 29: Looks like a typo on the bottle salt, should be 35., not 
  34. CTD salt was flagged questionable, but both are OK if typo is corrected. 
  If not, accept CTD salt and flag bottle salt as uncertain (or even "bad").

The wide spread in the oxygen data for the six surface trips and the six at 
  2400db indicate some sort of analytical problem. It's not likely a sampling 
  error, because it is hard to mess up near-surface samples that are close to 
  full saturation. Could be a pickling problem though. Oxygens in general this  
  cruise are not as sharp as they could be.

Station 101, btl. 22 at 90m: O2 and salt unlikely at this depth, but would be ok 
  at 60m where only ctd data listed, no water sample data. If left as is, should 
  flag nutrients doubtful also.

Station 104, btls. 10 and 11: Both salts high where listed, would be ok one 
  depth down. Other data ok as listed, so not mis-trips. Most likely sample 
  drawing errors.

Station 113, btl. 19: All data unlikely at second trip at 307db, but would be ok 
  at unlisted depth of about 250db (where bottle 19 was tripped on the last 
  station). Suggest examine original records to see if 250db was a planned 
  sampling depth. If so, list the data there as ok.

Station 143, btl. 8: O2 clearly poor where listed, but would be ok at the 
  unlisted depth between 3762 and 4172db; as would all of the other water sample 
  parameters. If moved, accept data as ok.

Station 145, btl. 13: Data questionable at listed pressure, would be ok if moved 
  up one depth. Bottle 13 and 14 double tripped on stations 142 and 147, most 
  likely here also.

Station 147, btl. 8: Data flagged doubtful, but would be ok if listed at the 
  unlisted pressure of about 4035db. Probably was start of mis-trip that led to 
  two trips at 3831db.

Station 148, btls. 11 and 12: Salt, O2, and silica all indicate bottle tripped 
  one depth deeper. If moved, accept data as ok.

Station 149, btl. 13: Data unlikely at this depth, would be ok listed one depth 
  shallower. Looks like another 13 and 14 double-trip. 


____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
      

G.2. DQE OF WOCE P06E HYDROGRAPHIC DATA
     (A. Mantyla)
     27 February 1994

The three legs of WOCE line P06 (E, C, and W) at about 32S in the Pacific, will 
be a very valuable data set to help fill in the most barren strip of Marsden 
Squares in the Pacific. The P06 data is generally quite good, but there are a 
couple of areas that could stand improvement (see below). The PI's have done a 
thorough job in sorting out rosette-trip problems, but there may be a few more 
that might be resolved upon re-examination, tabulated below. The data 
originators probably went overboard in flagging slightly anomalous data points 
as "bad" data, while the "questionable" data code might have been more 
appropriate. I've softened or changed some of those flags, but for the most 
part, the originators codes have been left as is.

There were a number of instances where "leaky" bottle were identified to have 
bad water samples by the salinity check sample, but only the salt and nutrients 
were flagged, while the oxygen was accepted as ok because it fortuitously 
appeared to fit in the profile. In the case of verified leakers, all water 
samples should be flagged doubtful. The oxygen precision in general, while 
better than many historical data sets was not up to WOCE expectations. The poor 
precision was seen in the duplicate trip data, mixed layer data, and numerous 
"bumps" in the deep profiles that were not supported by the CTD O2 data. 
Although some of the errors were likely due to sampling errors, the rest must be 
due to the specific analytical techniques used on the cruise. As an example of 
the excellent precision achieved elsewhere, the CalCOFI cruises, using the 
Carpenter whole bottle titration method, routinely report mixed layer oxygens 
that differ by no more than 0.01 ml/l. P06 mixed layer oxygens commonly had a 
spread of several times that value. I would urge that the analysts seriously 
reconsider their methodology and give the Carpenter system a try.

Salinity results also were not as sharp as WOCE expects, but in this case, I 
believe the source of the problem lies in the sample drawing stage, rather than 
in the analyses. According to the cruise report, salinity bottles were only 
rinsed twice, while nutrients, a part per hundred number, were given 3 rinses. 
Two salinity rinses is ok if the historical salinity precision of .003 to .005 
is the goal, but 3 rinses are a must to reach the WOCE goal of .001. Comparisons 
with nearby JUNO stations show that the desired WOCE targets are possible, the 
deep O2 and salt profiles are distinctly smoother (like the CTD profiles on both 
cruises) on JUNO. That doesn't mean  that the P06 data is bad, just that it is 
possible to do a little better. My impression was that the bumpiest profiles 
were from stations that started within a few hours of midnight, GMT.

The nutrient data looked quiet good, in spite of noticeable offsets from 
crossing WOCE lines, particularly in the silicate data. I think the cruise to 
cruise nutrient differences are an indication that the current nutrient 
methodology is not yet up to WOCE expectations, but both cruise results are as 
good as any that I've seen. The nutrient data appear to have been evaluated 
independently from the other data. Some nutrient bumps were flagged doubtful, 
but had supporting consistent oxygen inflections that were in turn verified by 
the CTD O2 probe, confirming that the nutrient anomalies were probably real. A 
few flags have been changed on that basis, but for the most part, I've gone 
along with the original flags.

The ".sum" files are incomplete and should be finished. This format is not very 
popular to outside groups; coming from the source at WHOI, one would expect to 
see a model example of how it should be done! Only the cast start time positions 
are tabulated. The WOCE guidelines expect a position for the cast down time 
(which is when the water sampling begins) and a cast end time position. A bottom 
depth and depth above the bottom should also be tabulated A few obvious goofs 
are tabulated below but the table needs to be fleshed out and proofed carefully.


The following are some specific problems that should be looked at:

Station 8, btl. 2: Data listed at 2038db unlikely, but would probably be ok 
  at   assumed unlisted trip depth between 2038 and 1588db, perhaps near 
  1888db. Bottles 3 and 4 both listed at 1588db, suspect rosette hang-up 
  started with bottle 2. Recommend data originators check to see if the data 
  listed at a shallower depth would be ok and then change data flags.

Station 9: Numerous trip errors, not all resolved. O2's not listed below 
  869db; they should be with appropriate quality codes. The data from bottles 2 
  and 9 are listed at odd pressure intervals, data would look ok if listed at 
  pressures midway between bracketing bottles. Data from bottles 20 and 21 are 
  essentially the same, suggesting both tripped at the same depth, perhaps near 
  815db according to the salinity gradient. If trip depth can't be resolved, 
  recommend flag all water samples from bottle 20 uncertain also. 

Station 10, btl. 17: Salt, silica and O2 suggests data would be ok if listed 
  at pressure about half way down to next reported pressure. If done, change 
  quality flag to ok.

Station 11, btl. 1: Increase in trench bottom O2 probably is real, see 
  SCORPIO stas. 83 and 90. The trench is the main conduit to the bottom Eastern 
  Pacific basins.

Station 13: Suspect sample drawing errors: salts from bottles 6 and 7 flagged  
  poor, would be ok in reverse order. No salt listed from deepest bottle. O2  
  from 20 was probably drawn from bottle 21. O2's from 6 and 7 clearly would  
  fit better deeper in the water column. On second thought, salt, O2, and 
  silica  from bottle 7 would be fine one depth deeper; if that were done, the 
  quality flags could be changed to ok.

Station 16, btls. 8 and 9: Both salt and O2 indicate they tripped one depth  
  deeper; nutrients ok at either depth. If moved accept data as ok. O2 from 
  bottle 3 probably drawn from bottle 2, must "u" it at present depth.

Station 17, btl. 8: Salt, O2 and nuts indicate bottle probably tripped at  
  unlisted depth about half way down to next depth. Data ok if moved; if left  
  as is, flag nutrients doubtful also.

Station 19, btls. 5 and 6: Salt, O2, silica would fit better with adjacent 
  Station and CTD O2 if water data moved up one depth. If done, change flags to 
  ok.

Station 31, btl. 6: Nutrients originally flagged bad, probably because they 
  look a little high. However, O2 inflection agrees with nutrient profile,  and 
  the bottle O2 is confirmed ok by the CTD O2, so I've flagged all of the data 
  as ok.

Station 32 salts: All appear high compared to adjacent Stations THETA - S  
  curves and the CTD, suspect faulty salinometer run. Recommend all be flagged 
  questionable (not done yet).

Station 41, btls. 3 and 4: Comparison of salinities with the CTD suggests  
  samples were reversed in sampling. However, O2 was also bad on bottle 4, so  
  only that depth was flagged, but bottle 3 salt could be also.

Station 55, btl. 32: Is the reported oxygen of 14.120 ml/l a typo or the 
  actual  measurement? Seems unlikely to titrate a factor of 3 times too high.

Station 64, btl. 21 O2: Clearly too high, but would agree with CTD O2 if a 
  transposition error had occurred: 5.93 ml/l recorded instead of 5.39 ml/l.  
  Should check with the original sources.
  

 .sum file, sta.  14: Probably on the 7th, rather than 6th.
 .sum file, sta   17: BO 8th, not 7th.
 .sum.file, stas. 21 and 22: Must have been on the 9th.
 .sum file, sta.  32: bottom date wrong, must be 13.
 .sum file, sta.  69: Longitude seems unlikely, 9 deg. off?


      
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
      

G.3. DQE OF WOCE P06W HYDROGRAPHIC DATA
     (A. Mantyla)
     7 March 1995

The P06W leg is the third and final leg of the WOCE section near 30S across the 
entire Pacific. All three legs were done using essentially the same equipment 
and methodology, so the DQE reports for the first two legs should be referred to 
for comments that are relevant to all three legs.

The salinity and oxygen precision in the deeper layers was better than on the 
previous two legs, but there was still a surprising and unlikely range in the 
mixed layer at times. Rosette trip malfunctions also occurred less often, but 
bottle 31 was often involved in mis-fires.

Phosphates were back on line this leg, with the exception of two stations (see 
below), the data looks quite good.

The last 20 stations consisted of two repeat segments of the end of the P06 line 
ascending the Australian slope. The hydrographic data consisted of essentially 
just 12 CTD calibration samples, they have no value as hydrographic profiles and 
I recommend that stations 248 to 267 be omitted from the P06 data set.

This section is a very nice improvement over the SCORPIO lines at 28 and 43S, I 
look forward to seeing the contoured sections.

COMMENTS ON SPECIFIC STATIONS:

Station 191, .sum:  The position appears to be one degree too far south to be 
  part of the section.  Needs to be verified, or corrected.

Station 195, btl. 31:  Bottle malfunctioned on the last station and appears to 
  have delay-tripped at the next depth up from its listed depth on this station.  
  As tabulated, all of the bottle 31 water samples should be considered 
  doubtful; but they would be ok if moved up a depth.

Station 229, PO4's:  Deeper phosphates are higher than adjacent stations, 
  relative to the cruise NO3/PO4 relationship.  Suggest data originators recheck 
  the phosphate end standard factors and baselines to see if the data can be 
  corrected.  If not, flag data below 900db uncertain.

Station 236, btls. 30 and 31 at 400 and 301db:  Water sample data nearly 
  identical, most likely both tripped at 400db.  If bottle 31 moved to 400db, 
  accept the data as ok; otherwise, flag all water samples questionable.

Station 238, PO4's:  Similar to station 229, deeper ones flagged questionable.  
  Suggest re-check end standard factor and baseline to see if the PO4 data can 
  be salvaged.

Stations 248-267:  The WOCE P06 section ends with station 246.  The remaining 
  20 stations were two repeat sections of the last 1 deg 30 min. longitude done 
  with a different CTD and a highly malfunctioning 12-place rosette.  The 
  hydrographic data from those stations have some slight value for calibration 
  of the CTD, but are of no value as hydrographic profiles.  I recommend they 
  not be reported.  The P06 section is complete with station 246, so the 
  remaining stations are not needed anyway.


      
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
      

G.4. DQE OF WOCE P06 CFC DATA
     (D. Wisegarver)
     1 December 2000

FINAL CFC DATA QUALITY EVALUATION (DQE) COMMENTS ON P06E.

  The final CFC DQE review was completed in Dec 2000 by David Wisegarver.
 
  Based on the data quality evaluation,  this data set meets the relaxed WOCE 
  standard (3% or 0.015 pmol/kg overall precision) for CFCs.  Detailed comments 
  on the DQE process have been sent to the PI and to the WHPO.

  The CFC concentrations have been adjusted to the SIO98 calibration Scale 
  (Prinn et al. 2000) so that all of the Pacific WOCE CFC data will be on a 
  common calibration scale.

  For further information, comments or questions, please, contact the CFC PI for 
  this section (Dr. R. Fine, rana@rsmas.miami.edu) or David Wisegarver 
  (wise@pmel.noaa.gov).

  More information may be available at www.pmel.noaa.gov/cfc.

************************************************************************
Prinn, R. G., R. F. Weiss, P. J. Fraser, P. G. Simmonds, D. M. Cunnold, 
F. N. Alyea, S. O'Doherty, P. Salameh, B. R. Miller, J. Huang, R. H. J. 
Wang, D. E. Hartley, C. Harth, L. P. Steele, G. Sturrock, P. M. Midgley, 
and A. McCulloch, A history of chemically and radioactively important gases 
in air deduced from ALE/GAGE/AGAGE J. Geophys. Res., 105, 17,751-17,792, 
2000.
************************************************************************




FINAL CFC DATA QUALITY EVALUATION (DQE) COMMENTS ON P06C
 
  The final CFC DQE review was completed in Dec 2000 by David Wisegarver.
 
  During the initial DQE review of the CFC data, a small number
  of samples were given QUALT2 flags which differed from the initial
  QUALT1 flags assigned by the PI.  After discussion, the PI concurred
  with the DQE assigned flags and updated the QUAL1 flags for these
  samples.
  
  The CFC concentrations have been adjusted to the SIO98 calibration Scale
  (Prinn et al. 2000) so that all of the Pacific WOCE CFC data will be on
  a common calibration scale.
 
  For further information, comments or questions, please, contact the CFC
  PI for this section (R. Weiss, rfw@gaslab.ucsd.edu) or David Wisegarver
  (wise@pmel.noaa.gov).
 
  Additional information on WOCE CFC synthesis may be available at:
  http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/cfc.
 
************************************************************************
Prinn, R. G., R. F. Weiss, P. J. Fraser, P. G. Simmonds, D. M. Cunnold,
F. N. Alyea, S. O'Doherty, P. Salameh, B. R. Miller, J. Huang, R. H. J.
Wang, D. E. Hartley, C. Harth, L. P. Steele, G. Sturrock, P. M.
Midgley,  and A. McCulloch, A history of chemically and radioactively
important gases  in air deduced from ALE/GAGE/AGAGE.  Journal of 
Geophysical Research, 105, 17,751-17,792, 2000.
************************************************************************




FINAL CFC DATA QUALITY EVALUATION (DQE) COMMENTS ON P06W
 
  The final CFC DQE review was completed in Dec 2000 by David Wisegarver.
 
  During the initial DQE review of the CFC data, a small number
  of samples were given QUALT2 flags which differed from the initial
  QUALT1 flags assigned by the PI.  After discussion, the PI concurred
  with the DQE assigned flags and updated the QUAL1 flags for these
  samples.
 
  The CFC concentrations have been adjusted to the SIO98 calibration Scale
  (Prinn et al. 2000) so that all of the Pacific WOCE CFC data will be on
  a common calibration scale.
 
  For further information, comments or questions, please, contact the CFC
  PI for this section (mwarner@ocean.washington.edu) or David Wisegarver
  (wise@pmel.noaa.gov).
  
  Additional information on WOCE CFC synthesis may be available at:
  http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/cfc.
 
************************************************************************
Prinn, R. G., R. F. Weiss, P. J. Fraser, P. G. Simmonds, D. M. Cunnold,
F. N. Alyea, S. O'Doherty, P. Salameh, B. R. Miller, J. Huang, R. H. J.
Wang, D. E. Hartley, C. Harth, L. P. Steele, G. Sturrock, P. M.
Midgley, and A. McCulloch, A history of chemically and radioactively
important gases  in air deduced from ALE/GAGE/AGAGE.  Journal of 
Geophysical Research, 105, 17,751-17,792, 2000.
************************************************************************


      
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________


G.6. DQE OF WOCE P06 CTD DATA
     (NIEL White)
     3 April 1995

On the whole the processors have done a good job with this cruise and 
this data set is a big improvement on the P16C data which I was sent last 
year.

I do, however, have a few complaints. The principal one is the question 
of units t68 for temperature and ml/l for oxygen). I gather that the WHP 
office has taken this issue up, so I will not labour it here. The other main 
complaint is that I feel that the noisy oxygen data in the top part of the 
water column on leg 3 should have been flagged as questionable. The report 
states that investigators may need to average or filter the data to make it 
useable (p 11) 1. This sounds like a fairly good definition of 'questionable 
data' to me.


TEMPERATURE CALIBRATION

The temperature calibrations are described on pp. 30-31 and appendix D. I 
would still like to see an accuracy estimate based on a comprehensive error 
budget of the calibration procedure. I suspect that the difference between 
the pre- and post-cruise calibrations of CTD 9 are more a statement about the 
accuracy of the calibration lab than about drift in the CTD.


SALINITY AND DISSOLVED OXYGEN CALIBRATION

On the whole the data processors have done a good job of calibrating the 
CM salinity and dissolved oxygen channels. I was pleased to see that the 
processors had not used unphysical values for some of the calibration 
parameters (which they had used at times when processing the P16C cruise).

For salinity (figure 1) and oxygen (figure 2) 1 have plotted profiles of 
scaled offsets between bottles and downcast CTD values. Deep offsets are 
plotted at a larger scale than shallow ones - the scale is shown by the two 
lines on the left hand side of each frame. At any depth the width of the 
wedge represents an offset (bottle - CTD) of .01 psu (figure 1) or 4 
µmoles (figure 2).

Note that only samples flagged as good data (quality byte = 2) are considered 
in this report.

Deep salinity fits

In general, deep salinity fits are good, except for the following stations:

         Where   
Station  in group     Problem
-------  -----------  ------------------------------------------------------
32       middle       approximately .004psu fresher than bottles from 2,000m 
                      down
44       middle       approximately .003psu fresher than bottles from 3,000m 
                      down
101      end          approximately .002psu fresher than bottles from 2,500m 
                      down
114      middle       approximately .003psu saltier than bottles from 3,500m 
                      down
120      end          fairly poor fit from about 1,000m down - saltier for 
                      part of the water column and fresher deeper down
121-122  whole group  both stations in the group seem to be on the salty 
                      side!!
     
While these differences must, to some extent, be due to the tendency of 
the CTD data (fitted in groups) to smooth out variations in the bottle data, 
I think that these sections should be looked at again.

Presumably the very short group of stations 121 - 122 was chosen because 
of difficulties fitting larger groups, but difficulties still remain. The 
deep CTD data for station 121 is a little salty compared to the bottles, but 
for station 122 it is substantially saltier. I find this intriguing! The 
report (p56 in appendix F) refers to a manual adjustment for station 122. Has 
this manual adjustment been done correctly?


DEEP OXYGEN FITS
I have used a scaling factor of 44.6595 to convert ml/l to molar units. I 
dare say that this is not the 'correct' way to do this conversion, but it 
will do for the purpose of this report.

The processors seem to have done a generally good job of calibrating the 
deep oxygen profiles. Apart from some obviously bad bottles (e.g. station 106 
at 4,001 decibars). The stations I would like to see looked at again are:


  Stations  Problem
  --------  --------------------------------------------------------------
   17 & 18  consistent deep offset (~2 µmoles) for both stations
   81 & 83  offset at the bottom
     116    poor fit from -3,300 decibars down (bad bottle data?)
     119    poor fit at the bottom - out by 2 - 3 µmoles
     126    deep fit would be improved by removing the bottle at 4,571 
            decibars
     131    poor fit from 3,600 decibars down
   137-149  generally poor fits in deep water (deeper than 3,000 decibars)
   155-161  the bottom section of most of these stations is offset
   164-170  the bottom section of most of these stations is offset
   173-178  fairly poor fits in deep water
   234-237  fairly poor fits from about 2,000 decibars down


I realize that, given the vagaries of the instrument, it may not be possible to 
do much with some of these. I feel, however, that they should be looked out 
again to see if some improvement can be made.


SHALLOW (0 - 1,000m) FITS

SHALLOW SALINITY FITS
Figure 3 is a plot of comparisons of upcast CTD salinities with the bottles from 
1 to 1,000 decibars and figure 4 is a plot of comparisons of downcast CTD 
salinities with the bottles over the same depth range. The scale is fixed 
through the depth range and is shown by the bars on the left of each figure. 
Most of the smaller offsets in figure 3 can be attributed to gradients, etc.

The CTD salinity values referred to in this section are the burst values from 
the hydrology files except where stated otherwise.

Fits are, in general, good, with the following exceptions:

Stations  Problem
--------  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    9     the CTD value at 66 decibars seems to be grossly wrong (= 31.368psu) 
          and, apart from this, the fit is poor
   88     surprisingly, salinities from the downcast fit the bottles better than 
          the values from the upcast. I suspect that this is the result of a 
          sampling or analysis problem and that these bottles should be 
          discarded
   90     the samples at 23 and 62 decibars seemed to have been interchanged - 
          the fit is quite good if you swap them over!
   97     the bottle at 156 decibars is clearly wrong
  142     the bottle at 160 decibars seems to have a wrong depth - both downcast 
          and upcast CTD values are offset from it by the same amount, and it 
          looks like it would fit much better at a shallower depth. This is 
          corroborated by the oxygen data.
  155     similar comments to those for station 142 apply to the bottle at 111
          decibars
  174     similar again except that the bottle at 110 decibars looks like the 
          depth is too shallow
  177     similar again - the bottle at 159 decibars looks too shallow
  222     the bottle at 305 decibars looks wrong - the downcast value fits 
          better!
  226     the bottle at 297 decibars looks wrong - the downcast value fits 
          better
  241     the downcast values fit better from about 200 - 500 decibars, 
          suggesting a sampling or analysis problem


SHALLOW OXYGEN FITS
As stated earlier, my main problem with the shallow oxygen data is the use of 
the noisy data on leg 3. This data is clearly of questionable value. It is 
stated on p32 that this data is very difficult to fit. This is not surprising 
and I would suggest that the following steps be taken:

  either: the noisy data be filtered and, where believable profiles could be 
          obtained the calibration calculations re-done

      or: the data be removed or flagged as questionable and not be used in the 
          calibration calculations.

The statement that surface spikes were common, but were not flagged is made on 
p32. Why weren't they flagged? This is, surely, questionable data and should be 
flagged appropriately.

Figure 5 is a plot of comparisons of downcast CTD oxygens with the bottles from 
0 to 1,000 decibars. The scale is fixed through the depth range and is shown by 
the bars on the left of each panel. It is hard to say anything sensible about 
the leg 3 data because of the above problems. The data for legs 4 and 5 looks 
quite good, given the limitations of the instrument. A number of the samples 
which look bad on these plots have, in fact, been fitted as well as can 
reasonably be expected -the offsets are due to downcast/upcast variability 
rather than poor fitting. However, I would like the following apparent problem 
areas to be looked at:

Stations  Problem
--------  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
   80     bottle at 634 decibars looks quite wrong
  119     bottle at 60 decibars looks quite wrong
  160     bottle at 160 decibars is offset, but could
          be due to upcast/downcast variability
171-177   all generally poor fits
  186     bottle at 207 decibars looks odd
  232     poor fit in top 200 decibars
  236     bottle at 202 decibars looks wrong
  238     poor fit in top 400 decibars


MINOR PROBLEMS

THERE ARE A FEW MINOR PROBLEMS AND/OR ANNOYANCES WITH THIS DATA SET:

• the record counts in some CTD fides are incorrect - for example, the header for 
  station 9 says that there are 1,767 data records in the file. This would be 
  correct if the data started at 1 decibar, but, as the data starts at 17 decibars 
  it is not. In fact there are 1,759 data records (17 -> 3,533 decibars).

• there are some bad interpolations. For example, the 'interpolated' salinity for 
  station 12 at 38 1 decibars is .05 psu different from the salinities on either 
  side (which are very nearly equal). The salinities for 379, 381 and 383 decibars 
  are 34.4500, 34.4004 and 34.4508! Station 147, 1,909 -1,911 decibars is another 
  example. How are these interpolations done? If they are being done manually they 
  should be checked more carefully. In addition, the interpolated salinity at 
  1,931 decibars in station 147 is (a) badly interpolated and (b) not flagged as 
  an interpolated value (flag = 2, not 6). Other bad interpolations or 
  interpolations that have not been flagged correctly are station 151 at the 
  surface, station 157 at 4,409 and 4,411 decibars, station 159 from 2,333 to 
  2,353 decibars. The flagging and the documentation are inconsistent for station 
  79. In addition, some of the end points that have been chosen for the 
  interpolation seem odd. For example, the salinity interpolation from 4,565 to 
  4,603 decibars in station 164 seems to be between points where the salinity has 
  already departed from the 'true' value. This is the second cruise I have seen 
  where there have been a number of poor interpolations. If the WHOI CTD group are 
  going to continue to provide interpolated data I think that they need to have a 
  careful look at their method for doing this. I make no guarantee that I have 
  found all instances of these problems.


      
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
      

G.5. PI RESPONSE TO HYDROGRAPHIC DQE
     (DQE Arnold Mantyla reviewed the Hydrographic Data)

SUM file:
  Bottom time and position added.  Maximum pressure corrected. 
  Corrected errors in stations 14, 17, 21, 32, 69, 191

DOUBLE TRIPS:
  A common problem with double trips is that although the CTD pressure and
  temperature were identical, for some reason the CTD salinity and CTD
  oxygen were not (probably due to the program that overwrites the old
  file with new data).  These double trips were identified and the CTD
  salinity and CTD oxygen checked for accuracy.

CTD, Salinity and Oxygen quality code changed:
  Agree almost entirely with DQE's suggested changes.


SPECIFIC PROBLEMS:

Station 8, bottle 2:
  Station log revealed no indication of a problem.  Decided not to make
  up a new depth.  If bottle did close at shallower depth then the bottle
  must have been closed while package was moving, which would also
  produce questionable results.
  
Station 9:
  Changed trip depth of bottle 11 to indicate bottle 11 and 12 double tripped
  at bottle 12's depth. Changed quality word to good.
  Station log depths for bottles 2 and 9 agree with depths in water
  sample file (*.hy2). 
  Oxygen water samples were not reported below 869db (lost in analyses?)
  thus 5 was used as the quality code. Trip depth not resolved, water
  samples (salt, oxygen and nutrients) marked questionable.
  
Station 10, btl. 17:
  Did not change trip depth.  Bottle was a leaker, water sample data
  left as questionable. 
  
Station 11, btl. 1:
  Oxygen looks too high in comparison to following stations that were
  also in the trench. Left oxygen quality code as questionable. 
  
Station 13: 
  Changed trip depth of bottle 7 to reflect bottle 7 double tripped with
  bottle 6 at bottle 6's depth.  Bottle 6 is a leaker, water sample data
  is questionable. 
  Bottle 20 oxygen probably was mistakenly drawn from bottle 21 but left
  quality code as bad.
  
Station 16, btls. 3, 8 and 9:
  Changed trip depths of bottles 8 and 9 to reflect bottle 8 double tripped
  with bottle 7, bottle 9 tripped at bottle 8's former depth and no
  bottle tripped at bottle 9's former depth.  Changed bottle 8 and 9's
  quality code to good. 
  Changed trip depth of bottle 3 to reflect bottle 3 double tripped with
  bottle 2 and no bottle tripped at bottle 3's former depth. Changed
  bottle 3's quality code to good.
  
Station 17, btl. 8:
  Trip depth unresolved, flagged quality code of salt, oxygen and
  nutrients as questionable.
  
Station 19, btls. 5 and 6:
  Changed trip depths of bottles 5 and 6 to reflect no bottle tripped at
  bottle 5's former depth, bottle 5 tripped at bottle 6's former depth
  and  bottle 6 double tripped with bottle 7 at bottle 7's depth.
  Changed bottle 5 and 6's quality code to good.
  

Station 31, btl. 6:
  Changed nutrient data quality code to good. Nutrient data analyzer,
  Joe Jennings will review change.
  
Station 32:
  All salinity quality codes changed to questionable.  Salinity
  analyzer, George Knapp did not find any reason to explain bad station
  data.  There was no shift in the salinometer standby number.
  
Station 41, btls. 3 and 4:
  Bottle 3 salinity flagged as questionable.  Bottle 4 salinity and
  oxygen flagged as bad.
  
Station 55, btl. 32:
  Oxygen analyzer, George Knapp remembers bottle 32 did indeed have an
  extremely high oxygen measurement.  One wild guess is perhaps the
  iodine measured in the titration had been increased due to the ink of a
  squid?! 
  
Station 64, btl. 21:
  Coincidence perhaps, probably not a typo, in any case bottle 21 quality
  code left as bad.
  
Stations 73 and 74: 
  Instrument test stations only, not included in data set.
  
Station 79, 1964db:
  Sample lost in analyses, quality code changed to 5 (not reported).
  
Station 80, btl. 24:
  No mix-up found and unlikely a typo. Bottle 24 quality code left as
  bad.
  
Station 81, btls. 7 and 8:
  Quality code of all nutrients for bottles 7 and 8 were changed to
  questionable.  Nutrient analyzer, Joe Jennings will review this
  change.
  
Station 89, btl. 20:
  Oxygen quality code changed to questionable.
  Quality code of deep silica's were changed to good.  Nutrient
  analyzer, Joe Jennings will review this change.
  
Station 90, btls. 35 and 36:
  Agree, that likely two surface salinity samples had been interchanged.
  No explanation found, so samples were not swapped, quality code was
  changed to questionable and CTD salinity quality code was changed to good.
  
Station 95:
  Left trip depths as they were and changed quality code of oxygen and
  nutrient data to questionable.  

  Station 97, btl.29:
  Salinity typo corrected, both salinity and CTD salinity quality
  codes were set as good.
  
Station 101, btl.22 at 90m:
  Changed trip depth to reflect bottle 22 double tripped with bottle 23 at
  bottle 23's depth.  Changed quality code to good.
  
Station 104, btls. 10 and 11:
  Changed bottle 10 and 11's quality code to bad.
  
Station 113, btl. 19:
  Original records show bottle was meant to trip at a depth near 250db.
  Changed trip depth, temperature, theta, CTD salt and CTD oxygen, to match
  original trip depth data.  Changed quality code to good.
  
Station 143, btl. 8:
  Original records show bottle was meant to trip at a depth 3967db.
  Changed trip depth, temperature, theta, CTD salt and CTD oxygen,
  to match original trip depth data.  Changed quality code to good.
  
Station 145, btl. 13:
  Changed bottle 13 trip depth to reflect bottle 13 and 14 double tripped at
  bottle 14's depth. Changed quality code to good.
  
Station 147, btl. 8:
  Original records show bottle was meant to trip at a depth 4039db.
  Changed trip depth, temperature, theta, CTD salt and CTD oxygen, to match
  original trip depth data.  Changed quality code to good.
  
Station 148, btls. 11 and 12:
  Changed trip depth of bottles 11 and 12 to reflect bottle 11 double
  tripped with bottle 10 at bottle 10's depth and bottle 12 tripped at
  bottle 11's former depth. Changed quality code to good.
  
Station 149, btl. 13:
  Changed trip depth of bottle 13 to reflect bottle 13 double
  tripped with bottle 14 at bottle 14's depth.
  Changed quality code of salinity to good but oxygen quality code left
  as questionable.
  
Station 195, btl. 31:
  Changed trip depth of bottle 31 to reflect bottle 31 double
  tripped with bottle 32 at bottle 32's depth.
  Changed quality code to good.
  
Station 229, PO4s:
  Changed PO4s quality code to questionable for all observations below
  900db.  Nutrient analyzer, Joe Jennings will review this change. 
  
Station 236, btls. 30 and 31 at 400 and 301db:
  Changed trip depth of bottle 31 to reflect bottle 31 double
  tripped with bottle 30 at bottle 30's depth.
  Changed quality code to good.
  
Station 238, PO4s:
  Nutrient analyzer, Joe Jennings will review. 
  
Stations 248 through 267:
  Stations are along cruise track and are considered part of the data
  set. 


____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
      

G.7. PI RESPONSE TO CTD DQE
     (DQE Neil White reviewed the CTD calibrations)

Units:
  The proper temperature and oxygen units have been converted by the WOCE
  office.

Leg 3 shallow oxygen:
  Did not filter nor flag as questionable.  The problem with the CTD
  oxygen and the surface spikes are described in the notes. 

Temperature calibration:
  Information about the temperature standard's accuracy  used in the
  calibration has been added.


DEEP SALINITY FITS

Station 32:
  Discrepancy due to bottles that were questionable, did not change the
  CTD data.
  
Station 44:
  CTD data theta-salinity plots overlaid stations 41, 42 and was only
  .001psu fresher than station 45.  Did not change CTD data.
  
Station 101:
  Changed CTD salinity by +.001psu. Desired good match at 2ØC theta with
  surrounding stations.
  
Station 114:
  Discrepancy due to bottles that were questionable, did not change the
  CTD data.
  
Station 120:
  Discrepancy due to bottles that were questionable, did not change the
  CTD data.
  
Station 121:
  Discrepancy due to bottles that were questionable, did not change the
  CTD data.
  
Station 122:
  Changed CTD salinity by -.002psu.  Original fix of +.004psu had been
  too much. 
  

DEEP OXYGEN FITS
  
Stations 17 and 18:
  Refit the CTD oxygen below 1500 db.
  
Stations 81 and 83:
  Bottom CTD oxygen quality code changed to questionable or bad.
  
Station 116:
  Discrepancy due to bottles that were questionable, did not change the
  CTD data.
  
Station 119:
  Refit the CTD oxygen below 3000 db.
  
Station 126:
  Bottle flagged as questionable. CTD oxygen was not changed.
  
Stations 131, 137- 149, 155- 161, 164-170, 173-178, 234-237:
  All of these stations had problems with deep oxygen fits. 
  Refit the CTD oxygen below 3000 db for not just these stations but the
  whole group from 131 through 178 and 232 through 240.  The CTD oxygen
  data from the new fit was put into the existing file replacing the
  existing deep CTD oxygen. The new and old oxygen were blended +/-
  50 db around the transition point (usually 3000 db) to keep the profile
  smooth as it changed from the existing oxygen to the new oxygen.  
  The new fits look good.  Even after this second fit though, station 175
  CTD oxygen below 5500 db did not look good, so its quality code below
  5500db was changed to bad. 
  
  
SHALLOW SALINITY FITS
  
Station 9:
  CTD salinity at 66db and next observation deeper quality codes changed
  to bad.
  
Station 88:
  CTD salinity quality code changed to questionable.
  
Station 90:
  Did not interchange bottle samples, left quality code as questionable.
  
Station 97:
  Changed quality code of bottle salinity at 156 db to questionable.
  
Station 142:
  CTD trip depths changed. Bottle 33 changed from closing at 160 db to
  closing at 111db. Bottle 34 changed from closing at 111db to 62db.
  Bottle 35 changed from closing at 62 db to 22 db.  Bottle 36 did not
  close. 
  
Station 155:
  Changed quality code of CTD salinity at 111 db to questionable.
  
Station 174:
  Changed quality code of bottle salinity and oxygen at 110 db to
  questionable. 
  
Station 177:
  Changed quality code of CTD salinity at 159 db to bad.
  
Station 222:
  Changed quality code of CTD salinity at 305 db to questionable.
  
Station 226:
  Changed quality code of CTD salinity at 297 db to questionable.
  
Station 241:
  Changed quality code of CTD salinity to questionable and bad for
  observations at bottles 17, 18 and 19.
  

SHALLOW OXYGEN FITS
  
Leg 3 shallow oxygen:
  Did not filter nor flag as questionable.  The problem with the CTD
  oxygen and the surface spikes are described in the notes. 
  
Station 80:
  Changed quality code of bottle oxygen at 634 db to questionable.
  
Station 119:
  Changed quality code of bottle oxygen at 60 db to questionable.
  
Station 160:
  Changed quality code of CTD oxygen at 160 db to questionable and at 111
  db to bad.
  
Station 171 through 177:
  For stations 171 through 174, CTD oxygen was refit for better fit 0 to
  3000 db. Used separate deep water fit for scaling data 3000 db to
  bottom.  For stations 175 through 178, corrected typo in
oxygen current bias scaling term and re-scaled data.
  
Station 186:
  Changed quality code of CTD oxygen at 207 db to questionable.
  
Station 232:
  Changed quality code of CTD oxygen at 15 db to bad. Did not change fit.
  
Station 238:
  Changed quality code of CTD oxygen at 20 db and 160 db to questionable.
  Did not change fit. 
  

Minor Problems
  Record counts in *.CTD file headers were changed to accurately state how
  many records were in the file.

Interpolations corrected.

Main problem appeared to be the discrepancy of what interpolations were 
  recorded in the station by station notes and what was actually done, recorded 
  in the list of interpolations made to CTD data. Problems the DQE noted were 
  and further discrepancies found were corrected.


____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
      

H. NOTES ON THE KNORR ANALYTICAL LAB

1. Temperature stability:  There is a separate thermostat for the
   analytical lab and it does work; however the tolerance seems too
   wide.  We recorded the temperature continuously for several days
   and the thermostat cycle has an amplitude of about 3 degrees C with
   a period of about 30 minutes.  Closing the after door to the lab
   did not noticeably change the period or amplitude. (There is a
   plastic draft barrier on the after door which has been in place
   continuously.)  The mean temperature for the past two months has
   been around 23 C, but there have been brief periods when the
   temperature has climbed to 27 degrees.
   
2. Power:  There were several complete power failures on the "clean
   power" circuit during P06 legs 1 and 2.  We also suspect, but cannot
   verify, that power fluctuations contributed to the failure of two
   DC boards in the RFA during leg 2.  I would strongly recommend the
   use of UPS systems and/or line conditioners for all computers and
   other sensitive equipment.
   
3. Water quality:  The ship's tap water is frequently discolored,
   presumably by iron.  We  compared the tap water with water directly
   from the evaporators and directly from the RO system.  The tap
   water had almost 0.4 micromolar phosphate, about 7 micromolar
   silicate, and negligible nitrate and nitrite. The RO water was
   better than tap, but still had measurable phosphate and silicate. 
   The evaporator product was almost indistinguishable from our
   deionized water (DIW), so we decided to use it as our feed water
   for the deionizer.  This has meant filling several 5 gallon carboys
   at the rear of the main lab every few days and pumping these
   through the deionizer as required to fill our 10 liter DIW
   reservoir.  If a clean water line were run directly into the
   analytical lab, it would be much more convenient.  This should be
   a simple matter as there is a supply of evaporator water to the
   main lab already.  There is a small deionizer installed in the
   after corner of the main lab.  It does not seem to be connected
   to a water supply, and I don't know which institution it belongs
   to.  I would not rely on it for deionized water.
   
4. Space:  We have used the forward bench for the nutrient
   analyzer, stripchart recorders, and a small data acquisition
   computer.  The forward inboard bench has our data processing
   computer, printer, and plotter.  The fold-down after inboard bench
   is desk height and has been great for reading stripcharts and
   general paperwork.  I don't know how much weight it will bear.  The
   after bench has a space 44 inches wide and about 30 inches deep
   next to the fume hood which could accommodate additional equipment. 
   We have used the entire outboard bench with it's sink for sample
   handling and reagent preparation, but this area could easily be
   shared.

Joe Jennings,  R/V KNORR, 7/25/92


      
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________

      
APPENDICES 


APPENDIX A: Station positions and summary
            (not available at time of last update)

APPENDIX B: Comments regarding CTD data acquisition:



LEG 3: 
=====
  
Aqui89 troubles from the start of leg3. Code got corrupted and was 
  scrambling the last three parameters (TP,TR,RT). Plotting of extra 
  variables and derived parameters was demonic. Test station 999 and 998, 
  and station 1 were acquired with this corrupt code. A backup AQUI89 
  tape from July 1991 was restored to the microvax and station 2 was 
  acquired with this code. Data clean. Plotting spikes for TE variable. 
  Station 1 was replayed from microvax rental, stations 11-17.
  
Test station 999 supplied too much power to fish, noise at bottom when 
  firing. Switched to battery, powered off lambda. Pressure spikes 
  apparent test station 998. Believed to be from pinger. Station 1 and 2 
  were deployed with no pinger to test this hypothesis.  Verified. Pinger 
  moved on rosette frame prior to station3, no spikes.
  
Triple cast in Chilean trench. Station 1-ctd No. 10, station 2-ctd No. 
  7, station 3-ctd No. 9. Decided to go with ctd 10. Ctd 7 bad oxy 
  sensor, cond noisy deep water. Ctd 9 equally as good as 10 but 
  consensus was to use 10 because of oxy pump. Ctd 10 showed some cond 
  hysteresis at theta of 2.3-2.8 deg on co vs. te plots but t/s showed no 
  up/down differences. Bob said diff in co attributed to diff in 
  pressure. Up/down different by 30dbar.
  
Replaced Oxygen sensor on ctd10 prior to station 4.
  
Power outages and total blackout prior to station 8. CTD02 and CTD03 
  both crashed. Early on, CTD03 had repeated crashes, at start of cruise 
  and in port in Jacksonville. Thought to be UPS, power or Ethernet 
  related, one user logged off "mike" ship's Ethernet at the same time 
  during one crash. Cause indeterminate. Noticed aqui record tags off by 
  50 dbars from deck unit readout on station logs. Changed average number 
  of scans in template file from 5 to 1 station 9 to no avail. Aqui tags 
  were always higher than deck unit readouts, indicating that the system 
  was somewhat slow, lagging behind the current scan. Quick fix: tagged 1 
  min after firing. Worked okay. Logged to CTD04 (latest version of P06 
  code that was corrupt on CTD03) stations 11-17 to compare bottle tag 
  files. CTD04 tag files were right on the mark, and furthermore, the 
  last 3 channels were not scrambled.
  
CTD03 crashed stations 12, cast 1. Restarted aqui cast 2. CTD03 crashed 
  again station 13, but logging to CTD04 so didn't restart CTD03 again. 
  Crashes seemed to indicate Ethernet problems. User logged out from 
  "mike" on ctd02 station 12 at exactly same time ctd03 lost connection. 
  Coincidence? Tagging offset also suggested that Ethernet was perhaps 
  slowing the system down. Decided to disconnect from ship's Ethernet and 
  create own ctd network.
  
Restored P06 AQUI89 code on CTD03 on 6 May and acquired station 14 with 
  the same code.  Ctd04 logging in tandem as backup still. Station 14 was 
  clean and tag files were right on the mark. Aqui plotting code re-linked 
  and recompiled May 8. Seemed last fix to software had bug in it, so 
  went back to plotting code just prior to last fix. Aqui89 code modified 

May 12 to add extra column in redt temp field in .WRW tag file to avoid 
  integer overflow.
  
Station 17, CTD03 crashed again. Likely culprits: HE/TRitium van or NUTS 
  Ethernet cables, or UPS/ship power problem. He/Tr van was not working 
  when hooked up through hydrovan to ctd network to ships network. 
  Disconnected He/Tr cable, wired directly to ship and Ethernet working 
  fine. Thought He/Tr and hydrovan had an interrupt or board conflict.
  
Winch failed station 21 3500 m on upcast. Only 3 bottles fired. Brake 
  froze.
  
CTD sat 500 m off bottom for 5-6 hours before got working again. 
  Switched over to markey winch station 22.
  
After record tags edited manually and templates distributed, discovered 
  numerous double tripping of bottles. Just about every station through 
  station 22. Changed pylons prior to station 23 which proved successful.
  
Station 27 new co slope. Markey winch failed 700 m upcast station 27. 
  Cast aborted. CTD had to be brought on deck manually. Switched back to 
  first winch. Required second person to manually operate brake.
  
After recovery on station 28, CTD endcap opened. Seacon 4 pin bulkhead 
  connectors replaced. Aqui locked up station 30 for about 2 minutes, no 
  data written to tape. Station 31 CTD03 threatened to lose connection to 
  cluster (ctd02) again. Immediately disconnected Nuts Ethernet cable and 
  regained instantaneous connection. Decided to disconnect NUTs cable and 
  hook up only during steaming. Days later, replaced Nuts cable with a 
  different cable. Hydrovan could not log in when this cable was 
  connected. NUTS Ethernet address in conflict with one on ship in SSG 
  group. Changed name and address. Should not have been the cause of 
  crashes since no conflict with ctd network. Days later, can have both 
  nuts and hydrovan on net with no conflicts. It was believed at
  end of leg3 that He/Tr van had a bad cable.
  
New pinger station 36.
  
Swapped redt temp modules station 59.
  
New pressure temperature cals ctd 10. Revised aqui template station 60. 
  Also cleaned conductivity cell with HCL prior to station 60.
  
Watch forgot to increase seacableI to 470ma on downcast start station 61 
  until approx. 500 m down. Oxygen erroneous and erratic first 500 m. 
  entire cast. Winch troubles again station 63. Flipped circuit breaker, 
  power restored. Restart cast 2 at 10m. Lost power one more time before 
  cast completed.
  
Error writing to 9-track station 65. Did a stop_watch, logger hung. 
  Tried to force and restart several times with no success. Killed 
grabber, re-executed sysmgr commands and restarted aqui, cast 2. Tape and 
  disk okay, but no header file on disk. Same error to 9- track station 
  69. CTD_LOG in RWMBX state, can't force or stop_aqui, only stop/id 
  works.
  
Test rebuilt markey winch station 69. Turn off oxygen pump station 70. 
  Pump flow facing up on last two station 71 & 72. Oxygen noisy, as on 
  station 70. Rotate back to face down on Leg4.
  
Bottom (PDR) depth vs. pressure discrepancies: station 11,23,36,38, 
  43,45,47,56, 57,67. 56 & 57 drifting over slope, false bottom readings? 
  Trouble with 9-track last two stations.  End of leg3, during swim call, 
  UPS's went on alarm, all 3 systems crashed. Believe 9-track troubles 
  might have to do with power.
  


LEG 4: 
=====
  
Surge suppressor on aqui 9-track. CTD02 and CTD03 on UPS on clean power. 
  Repacked hard disk dua4 for acquisition.
  
Reoriented oxygen pump outtake on ctd10 to face down. 
  
Double cast station 73 (ctd 7) and 74 (ctd 10) in same position as 
  station 72 on leg3.  Attempted to first deploy ctd 9 at station 73, 
  fatal failure. Troubleshot to power supply board. CTD 7 deployed with 
  old oxy sensor (bad). Conductivity still looks noisy as compared to ctd 
  10 and ctd 9. Slight hysteresis in deep water t/s plot. CTD 10, station 
  74, lowered with not enough current to fish. Data noisy. Cond appears to 
  be offset, oxygen looks offset and has different shape. Omit these two 
  station 73 & 74 from final ctd data set. Record tag data erroneous 
  scans station 74.
  
Became apparent ctd 10, 9, and 7 wired differently. Transmissometer 
  cable different for each instrument.
  
Fatal failure ctd 10 prior to station 76. Switched over to ctd 9 with 
  new power supply board and no oxy pump. Scot touched case and got 
  zapped, ctd underwater cable bunged up.  Replaced with new one. Signal 
  still noisy. Ground lug on termination broke off (corrosion), and had 
  to be replaced. Finally deployed ctd 9. Interference on upcast when 
  firing bottles. PHANTOM problem -comes and goes.
  
Upon examination, sea cable bulkhead connector corroded ctd 10. Salt 
  deposits found at both end caps. Battery pack shot with salt and 
  corrosion. High voltage pin had corroded from getting wet because non-
  watertight plug was used for charging between stations on leg3. Epoxy 
  connector broke down and water wicked in through the pin. Had been going on 
  for a while on leg3. Just got lucky that ctd 10 lasted through leg3. 
  Took out battery pack and dc-dc regulator. Removed battery fuse (not 
  needed anyway because separate conductors for ctd and rosette). Oxy 
  pump board burnt. Power converter died. Need replacement. Jeff rigged 
  up transistor circuit to replace original power converter, but 10 was 
  rushed back into service before he could get the pump board fully 
  checked and installed. 
  
Station 78, switched over to battery for power supply to fish to try and 
  eliminate interference problem (ctd 9) but battery died on upcast. As a 
  result, upcast poor data quality esp. last 12 bottles, i.e. 600 m.
  
Winch died 1880m downcast station 79. Gap in data. Need to ctlog CU mode 
  back at clark 1880-2100m.
  
Switch over to markey winch station 86. Upon recabling to second 
  termination, ctd 9 redt temp out. Disconnected and when plugged back 
  in, oxy sensor failed. Deployed CTD 10 in its place. Later, when ctd 9 
  powered up in wet lab, all checked okay. DIED again a few days later. 
  Further examination revealed inept wiring, poor soldering (shoddy 
  workmanship).  Replaced sign gen and adaptive sampling boards. Power 
  still flaky. Checked voltages and found that sometimes the 6V from ctd 
  power supply was drooping because of excessive loading effects. Both 
  the 2 channel digitizer and the otm board use this 6V along with the 
  ctd comparator and adaptive sampling. Since this regulator current 
  limited to 40 mA, it really doesn't have enough poke to handle the 
  load. Fix was to take the 5V regulator on the OTM board (which uses the 
  6V as input) and run it from the 12V regulator located on the same 
  (otm) board, instead of the ctd 6V power supply. Now ctd 9 running like 
  a champ.  CTDs seem to be right on the margin of being overloaded in 
  terms of power. If put ctd 7's otm card in place of 9's (before the 
  fix), ctd 9 would work. Implies juice marginally available, ctd highly 
  sensitive to minor fluctuations. 
  
CTD 10 looking better Leg4 than leg3. Conductivity more consistent. 
  Oxygens fitting much better without pump. Leg3, oxygen noisy 1st 400 m 
  with pump. Also, hard to fit oxygens at oxy mins and maxes and in deep 
  water on leg3. Not sure whether problems related to ctd going south, or 
  problem with pumping mechanism, or simply because gradients much sharper 
  on leg3 than Leg4.
  
Vaxes crashed station 91, last record tag. Open data files aqui. Replay 
  from audio.  Engineer checked clean power with scope, believes one of 
  lines has contaminated ground.
  
STA 95,97-99 offset bottle data. Changed pylons and rosette firing units 
  prior to station 102. Cond shift ctd between station 102 and 103.
  
Inner rosette fired first station 108-111,113-114.
  
Upon recovery station 110 (rough seas), package hit hull before top ring 
  on package finally hooked with pole. As package brought on deck, air 
  tugger bent frame (top ring) and deformed it. Vertical bars a 
  nightmare.
  
Station 112 deployed with ctd No. 9 using 24 bottle rosette. No 
  transmissometer, no room for it on package. Oxygen failure on downcast. 
  Conductivity noisy bottom of downcast, failure after 1st bottle on 
  upcast. Numerous leakers. Salts poor, oxygens horrendous.  Overall, 
  station almost a complete loss. Upon examination, ctd 9 showed sensor 
  head flooded with water. Sensor head rotated prior to deployment to 
  accommodate new package.  Further examination revealed that No. 9 tty fsk 
  board wired to wrong pin. Couldn't just swap out boards between 
  instruments. Miracle any data was ever collected with this instrument! 
  CTD 9 back on line 6/17/1992.
  
Upon recovery station 113, ship took roll at 40 m on upcast. Tow line 
  got caught in propeller. Blocks hit boom and broke off. Vertical bars 
  now almost impossible to put in place. Wire also came up with a kink in 
  it. New termination prior to station 114. Upon recovery of station 114, 
  cable came up with new kink.
  
Vertical bars taken off rosette package station 115. Replaced with 2 
  horizontal bars at bottom of package.
  
New top plate on pylon prior to station 116.
  
Due to inclement weather and decreased ship speed (40-45 knot winds, 
  ship cruising speed of 3 knots) and down time for hardware problems, 
  spacing between stations increased from 40-50 nm after station 116.
  
Swapped back in 36 bottle rosette deck unit prior to station 120. 
  Previous unit (Scripps) had message on grate saying problems with 
  firing.
  
Power outage, vaxes brought down 6/16/92 for one hour. Back on line for 
  station 121. 
  
Co shift ctd station 121.
  
New termination prior to station 122. 3rd horizontal bar also put on 
  package.
  
CTD02 CRASHED 6/17/92, after recovery station 122.
  
6/17/92- ship on two engines, speed to station increased to 11 to 12 
  knots.

6/17/92 discovered that just 15 min prior to previous day's power 
  outage, hydrovan got shift in salts (fresh) while running autosal. 
  Reran afterwards, same samples now saltier.  Apparently, autosal hooked 
  up on 440 transformer (unreg power) with no UPS or surge protection. 
  Will hook up to clean power and run off BEST UPS in helium van. Accounts 
  for repeated shifts in salts and scatter for both legs3 and 4. STA 124 
  SWAPPED OUT AUTOSALS.  Using autosal No. 10. Bath was leaking, had to be 
  taken apart and re-glued before using.
  
T/S anomaly starting at station 128. Saltier in deep water. Markey winch 
  station 133. Lost power to winch during cast 3-4 times.
  
Switched back to AB Johnson winch station 134.
  
Vaxes crashed on downcast 700m off bottom station 136. Plugged terminal 
  into UPS on aqui, powered off and completely shut off UPS and power to 
  ctd03. Minutes later, ctd02 crashed.  Rebooted systems, logged rest of 
  station as cast 2. Replayed downcast from VCR tape. 9- track went 
  offline, error msg, manually put online and logging resumed.
  
Touched bottom station 137. Muddy water seeped out of frame upon 
  recovery. Wire came up with two kinks. Cond shifted station 138.
  
Winch failed at bottom of downcast station 139. CTD package dragged on 
  bottom until ship increased speed to increase wire angle.
  
Increased ship speed (12-13 knots) and increased speed at haulback of 
  ctd (80 m/min) warranted changing station spacing to 40 nm again after 
  station 139, until mooring line.
  
Station 141 (ctd No. 9) and 142 (ctd No. 10) double cast. Test 
  resurrected ctd No.9. Performed like a champ. Funny oxy blip. New 24 
  bottle pylon station 141 to try and alleviate non-confirmations for 
  bottles 11 & 12. 
  
Kinks in wire warranted new termination station 145. 
  
Took vaxes off UPS to reset from home to generator mode. Widened 
  frequency window. Systems back on UPS station 148.
  
Hangar hoist repaired prior to station 150. Upon recovery of station 
  149, control handle cable pulled out, lead disconnected. Had to 
  Reengage strain release boot. After switching pylons at station 141, 
  became evident 24 bottle rosette double tripping. Swapped out 24 bottle 
  pylon back to original. Replaced bulkhead connector. No more double 
  trips.
  
Station 156, error logging to 9-track. Log upcast as cast 2. Upon 
  recovery, found cable between ctd and rosette caught in bottle 35. Ok.
  
Disable transmissometer station 156-179, spec'd out to only 5500 m.
  
Power failure prior to station 157. Ctd lifted off deck. 9-track 
  offline. Brought ctd back to deck. Stopped aqui. Power outage. Systems 
  stayed up on UPS. Power came back on, restarted station. Believe power 
  to have been cause of problem (9-track going offline) on station 156. 
  9-track has narrower window of frequency operation than UPS's.
  
Spikes at 2100,4400,5500 dbars station 156-167 on down and up cast. 
  Erroneous tags in .wrw file. Cable appears to be cause.
  
Prior to station 168, swapped ctd signal and 12 bottle pylon conductors. 
  No more spikes, data clean.
  
Kermadec Trench station 174-175. CTD taken down to approx. 6900 dbars. 
  CTD pressure transducer maxed out at 6553.5 dbars. Spike in co, te, and 
  ox at ] bottom. Pressure for last two rec tags estimated from wire out. 
  Could be off by 15 dbars. 
  
Prior to station 179, took out large air bubble in ctd 10 oxy sensor. 
  Refilled with oil.
  
Transmissometer on again station 180.
  
Station 182 EAST longitude.

Fired inner rosette first station 183,185,188.
  
AQUI89 mag tapes recorded on low density (800 bpi) station 185 & 186.
  
Double cast station 187 (ctd 9) and station 188 (ctd 10). Station 187 
  had another funny oxy blip similar to 141. Could not fit ctd oxygen to 
  bottle oxygen station 187. Recommend new oxy sensor if ctd 9 used on 
  leg5. Conductivity looks fine.
  
At end of leg4, rosette troubles. Getting confirmed firings but pins not 
  releasing because sticking due to salt deposit buildup. Pylon was not 
  being lubricated regularly. Sprayed liberally with CRC station 185. 
  Bottles 23 & 24 not confirming. Believe cause is harness plug. Pete 
  will replace prior to leg5. Realigned motor housing on two backup 
  pylons, now ready to go if need be.
  


LEG 5: 
======

At dock in Auckland, the DEC software Licenses expired. This killed 
  things like mail (critically necessary for AQUI), Fortran compilers, 
  and communications (ftp and telnet).  Apparently the microvaxes were 
  shipped before the current license upgrade got to WHOI, so were not 
  upgraded.... Tom B. Warren and Cyndy all assisted with sending along the  
  appropriate fixes. thank god for Fax & telex. Necessary operations were 
  back up before leaving Auckland at 1600 July 13 (but it was close). 
  Stations 189 & 190 were repeats to 187 & 188 at the end of leg4. 187 
  and 189 were with ctd 9, 188 and ] 190 were with ctd10.  Ctd10 still 
  looks fine, so will continue to use with no modifications. 
  
Stn 201 Crashed CTD (60m/min) because missed a wrap on the pdr. The only 
  obvious problem was that the bolts securing the ctd to the frame had 
  sheared, and the ctd itself was loose on recovery. Swapped to the other 
winch while re-terminating, but just as got the fish in the water the 
  power went off on the winch, and so had to wait for Peter to 
  -terminate.  Post crash numbers look pretty good. There's a slight 
  salinity shift in the deep water, that John thinks is due to 
  conductivity shift, not temperature. (the FSI ctd's temp offset is what 
  it was pre-crash)
  
BOTTOM CONTACT: Station 137,139 : 201,252 PROBLEM STATIONS: Tag files 
  station 74, 78 & 112. Power low, erroneous tags. Recreated from raw 
  downcast data. Downcast 1800-2100 station 79 due to winch failure. Need 
  to ctlog cu mode cut and paste. Station 112- no oxy downcast. Cond 
  noisy end of downcast, failed on upcast. Sensor head flooded. No bottle 
  data station 141 test ctd 9. Could not calibrate oxygens. Test ctd 9 
  again station 187.  Could not fit ctd oxy to bottle oxygens. 
  
193 - has a very spiky 1st record that cannot be removed with ctded78. 
  tried upping the pmin, and recmin, and in both cases the 1st recore 
  remained, and the second record changed.
  
215 & 228 HAD SAM SPIKE AT THE BEGINNING AS 193. all were fixed by using 
  ctlog to copy records X to Y of the file to 9-track, then ctded-ing 
  1,y-x from the 9-track.
  
246 had an GNXTR error and would not read at all in plt78, so couldn't even find 
  the record limits. Reprocessed to disk from audio, and then worked OK.


      
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________


APPENDIX C: SUMMARY OF FITS TO THE CTD LABORATORY PRESSURE DATA



-------------------
CTD10 PRESSURE
  PRECRUISE FIT 
-------------------
  LABFIT: FHBIAS,Pslope
   0.00000000E-01   0.10000000
         MEAN CCR = ????????????   
    PRS ROOM TEMP = 22.70
  PROGRAM VERSION   RUSCAL  910316  
        DISK FILE = 10mr92pr.cal        
         VARIABLE = PRESSURE        
   19 DATA POINTS   ORDER OF POLY  2

 POLY COEF = -.246449E+00 0.100352E+00 -.294565E-08 

              INSTRUMENT       OBSERVED      CALCULATED      DIFFERENCE
              ------------    -----------    -----------     ----------
     1             1.80000       0.120000      -0.065816       0.185816
     2          7283.40        730.609985     730.498962       0.111012
     3         14156.4        1419.780030    1419.782230      -0.002208
     4         21029.4        2109.010010    2108.787110       0.223012
     5         27905.8        2798.260010    2797.854740       0.405385
     6         34783.2        3487.540040    3486.743410       0.796742
     7         41668.4        4176.810060    4176.134280       0.675649
     8         48559.6        4866.129880    4865.846190       0.283559
     9         55450.4        5555.439940    5555.238770       0.201039
    10         62343.6        6244.799800    6244.591310       0.208363
    11         55457.6        5555.439940    5555.958980      -0.519176
    12         48568.6        4866.129880    4866.747070      -0.617320
    13         41680.2        4176.810060    4177.315430      -0.505504
    14         34793.0        3487.540040    3487.724850      -0.184703
    15         27912.2        2798.260010    2798.495850      -0.235728
    16         21037.0        2109.010010    2109.549070      -0.538951
    17         14159.6        1419.780030    1420.103030      -0.323009
    18          7287.00        730.609985     730.860046      -0.250072
    19             2.80000       0.120000       0.034535       0.085465
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      MEAN DEVIATION = -0.329794E-04
  STANDARD DEVIATION =  0.406677E+00



-------------------
CTD10 PRESSURE
  POSTCRUISE FIT 
-------------------

  LABFIT: FHBIAS,Pslope
   0.00000000E-01   0.10000000
         MEAN CCR = ????????????   
    PRS ROOM TEMP = 21.40
  PROGRAM VERSION   RUSCAL  910316  
        DISK FILE = 10se92pr.cal        
         VARIABLE = PRESSURE        
   21 DATA POINTS   ORDER OF POLY  2

  POLY COEF = -.139633E+01 0.100309E+00 -.251698E-08 

              INSTRUMENT       OBSERVED      CALCULATED      DIFFERENCE
              ------------    -----------    -----------     ----------
     1             8.80000       0.060000      -0.513614       0.573614
     2          3859.40        385.940002     385.697021       0.242978
     3          7298.40        730.559998     730.561646      -0.001620
     4         14171.8        1419.729980    1419.651000       0.078946
     5         21047.0        2108.969970    2108.683110       0.286954
     6         27925.0        2798.239990    2797.757570       0.482510
     7         34805.0        3487.520020    3486.794190       0.725919
     8         41692.0        4176.799800    4176.292970       0.506680
     9         48582.8        4866.120120    4865.933110       0.186856
    10         55473.4        5555.450200    5555.314940       0.135098
    11         62368.0        6244.810060    6244.856930      -0.047031
    12         55474.6        5555.450200    5555.434570       0.015469
    13         48590.2        4866.120120    4866.673830      -0.553867
    14         41702.6        4176.799800    4177.353520      -0.553867
    15         34814.4        3487.520020    3487.735350      -0.215243
    16         27932.8        2798.239990    2798.538820      -0.298740
    17         21053.0        2108.969970    2109.284180      -0.314120
    18         14176.2        1419.729980    1420.092040      -0.362094
    19          7303.00        730.559998     731.022888      -0.462863
    20          3865.80        385.940002     386.338867      -0.398868
    21            14.8000        0.060000       0.088237      -0.028237
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      MEAN DEVIATION = -0.726130E-04
  STANDARD DEVIATION =  0.380907E+00



---------------------------------
CTD10 PRESSURE
  COMBINATION FIT (FINAL FIT)
---------------------------------
  LABFIT: FHBIAS,Pslope
   0.00000000E-01   0.10000000
         MEAN CCR = ????????????   
    PRS ROOM TEMP = 22.70
  PROGRAM VERSION   RUSCAL  910316  
        DISK FILE = pr10bc.cal          
         VARIABLE = PRESSURE        
   40 DATA POINTS   ORDER OF POLY  2

  POLY COEF = -.436677E+00 0.100333E+00 -.276775E-08 

              INSTRUMENT       OBSERVED      CALCULATED      DIFFERENCE
              ------------    -----------    -----------     ----------
     1             1.20000       0.120000      -0.316277       0.436277
     2          7282.80        730.609985     730.122681       0.487275
     3         14155.8        1419.780030    1419.304570       0.475495
     4         21028.8        2109.010010    2108.224610       0.785309
     5         27905.2        2798.260010    2797.224120       1.035798
     6         34782.6        3487.540040    3486.062010       1.477937
     7         41667.8        4176.810060    4175.418950       1.391267
     8         48559.0        4866.129880    4865.114260       1.015778
     9         55449.8        5555.439940    5554.506350       0.933747
    10         62343.0        6244.799800    6243.874510       0.925446
    11         55457.0        5555.439940    5555.226070       0.214020
    12         48568.0        4866.129880    4866.014160       0.115876
    13         41679.6        4176.810060    4176.600100       0.210114
    14         34792.4        3487.540040    3487.043460       0.496491
    15         27911.6        2798.260010    2797.865480       0.394440
    16         21036.4        2109.010010    2108.986330       0.023591
    17         14159.0        1419.780030    1419.625370       0.154694
    18          7286.40        730.609985     730.483704       0.126252
    19             2.20000       0.120000      -0.215944       0.335944
    20             0.600000      0.060000      -0.376477       0.436477
    21          3851.20        385.940002     385.925262       0.014741
    22          7290.20        730.559998     730.864868      -0.304900
    23         14163.6        1419.729980    1420.086550      -0.356536
    24         21038.8        2108.969970    2109.226810      -0.256927
    25         27916.8        2798.239990    2798.386230      -0.146331
    26         34796.8        3487.520020    3487.483890       0.036042
    27         41683.8        4176.799800    4177.020510      -0.220550
    28         48574.6        4866.120120    4866.674800      -0.554534
    29         55465.2        5555.450200    5556.046390      -0.596038
    30         62359.8        6244.810060    6245.555180      -0.744964
    31         55466.4        5555.450200    5556.166500      -0.716155
    32         48582.0        4866.120120    4867.415530      -1.295257
    33         41694.4        4176.799800    4178.082030      -1.282073
    34         34806.2        3487.520020    3488.425540      -0.905608
    35         27924.6        2798.239990    2799.167720      -0.927825
    36         21044.8        2108.969970    2109.828120      -0.858245
    37         14168.0        1419.729980    1420.527710      -0.797698
    38          7294.80        730.559998     731.326172      -0.766204
    39          3857.60        385.940002     386.567261      -0.627258
    40             6.60000       0.060000       0.225522      -0.165522
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      MEAN DEVIATION = 0.957400E-05
  STANDARD DEVIATION = 0.707909E+00



-------------------
CTD9 PRESSURE
  PRECRUISE FIT 
-------------------
  LABFIT: FHBIAS,Pslope
   0.00000000E-01   0.10000000
         MEAN CCR = 0.000000E+00   
    PRS ROOM TEMP = 20.80
  PROGRAM VERSION   RUSCAL  910316  
        DISK FILE = 9MR92PR.cal         
         VARIABLE = PRESSURE        
   19 DATA POINTS   ORDER OF POLY  2

  POLY COEF = 0.450652E+00 0.100557E+00 0.297377E-09 

              INSTRUMENT       OBSERVED      CALCULATED      DIFFERENCE
              ------------    -----------    -----------     ----------
     1            -6.00000       0.090000      -0.152691       0.242691
     2          7256.00        730.590027     730.108582       0.481416
     3         14108.8        1419.770020    1419.249880       0.520173
     4         20962.0        2109.010010    2108.459470       0.550569
     5         27815.0        2798.280030    2797.676510       0.603547
     6         34668.4        3487.570070    3486.961910       0.608186
     7         41521.4        4176.850100    4176.235350       0.614778
     8         48378.6        4866.189940    4865.958500       0.231477
     9         55231.2        5555.509770    5555.247070       0.262727
    10         62088.4        6244.879880    6245.026370      -0.146453
    11         55236.2        5555.509770    5555.750000      -0.240203
    12         48382.6        4866.189940    4866.360840      -0.170867
    13         41531.0        4176.850100    4177.200680      -0.350554
    14         34680.4        3487.570070    3488.168700      -0.598601
    15         27825.6        2798.280030    2798.742680      -0.462615
    16         20977.8        2109.010010    2110.048340      -1.038299
    17         14119.8        1419.770020    1420.356200      -0.586150
    18          7264.40        730.590027     730.953308      -0.363311
    19            -2.00000       0.090000       0.249538      -0.159538
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      MEAN DEVIATION = -0.541398E-04
  STANDARD DEVIATION =  0.498984E+00



-------------------
CTD9 PRESSURE
  POSTCRUISE FIT 
-------------------
  LABFIT: FHBIAS,Pslope
   0.00000000E-01   0.10000000
         MEAN CCR = ????????????   
    PRS ROOM TEMP = 22.00
  PROGRAM VERSION   RUSCAL  910316  
        DISK FILE = C9SE92PR.cal        
         VARIABLE = PRESSURE        
   21 DATA POINTS   ORDER OF POLY  2

 POLY COEF = 0.365801E+01 0.100568E+00 0.405269E-09 

              INSTRUMENT       OBSERVED      CALCULATED      DIFFERENCE
              ------------    -----------    -----------     ----------
     1           -40.0000        0.040000      -0.364729       0.404729
     2          3797.60        385.920013     385.582794       0.337229
     3          7225.00        730.539978     730.286560       0.253428
     4         14076.4        1419.709960    1419.380620       0.329295
     5         20927.2        2108.949950    2108.452390       0.497508
     6         27778.2        2798.209960    2797.582520       0.627390
     7         34630.0        3487.489990    3486.831050       0.658885
     8         41480.6        4176.770020    4175.997070       0.773142
     9         48337.2        4866.100100    4865.804690       0.295603
    10         55190.8        5555.419920    5555.348630       0.071482
    11         62044.0        6244.779790    6244.890140      -0.110158
    12         55192.2        5555.419920    5555.489750      -0.069631
    13         48343.6        4866.100100    4866.448240      -0.347951
    14         41493.2        4176.770020    4177.264650      -0.494436
    15         34641.6        3487.489990    3487.997560      -0.507619
    16         27791.4        2798.209960    2798.910160      -0.700246
    17         20937.0        2108.949950    2109.438230      -0.488332
    18         14085.8        1419.709960    1420.326050      -0.616140
    19          7232.40        730.539978     731.030823      -0.490835
    20          3804.20        385.920013     386.246582      -0.326559
    21           -35.0000        0.040000       0.138113      -0.098113
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      MEAN DEVIATION = -0.633136E-04
  STANDARD DEVIATION =  0.464840E+00



--------------------------------
CTD9 PRESSURE
  COMBINATION FIT (FINAL FIT)
--------------------------------

  LABFIT: FHBIAS,Pslope
   0.00000000E-01   0.10000000
         MEAN CCR = ????????????   
    PRS ROOM TEMP = 20.80
  PROGRAM VERSION   RUSCAL  910316  
        DISK FILE = pr9bc.cal           
         VARIABLE = PRESSURE        
   40 DATA POINTS   ORDER OF POLY  2

 POLY COEF = -.338764E+00 0.100564E+00 0.338159E-09 

              INSTRUMENT       OBSERVED      CALCULATED      DIFFERENCE
              ------------    -----------    -----------     ----------
     1             0.900000      0.090000      -0.248257       0.338257
     2          7262.90        730.590027     730.064148       0.525898
     3         14115.7        1419.770020    1419.257450       0.512592
     4         20968.9        2109.010010    2108.522710       0.487202
     5         27821.9        2798.280030    2797.799560       0.480366
     6         34675.3        3487.570070    3487.148930       0.421039
     7         41527.3        4176.850100    4176.388670       0.461323
     8         48385.5        4866.189940    4866.283690      -0.093853
     9         55238.1        5555.509770    5555.647950      -0.138287
    10         62095.3        6244.879880    6245.505860      -0.626080
    11         55243.1        5555.509770    5556.150880      -0.641216
    12         48389.5        4866.189940    4866.686520      -0.496685
    13         41537.9        4176.850100    4177.454590      -0.604595
    14         34687.3        3487.570070    3488.355960      -0.785992
    15         27832.5        2798.280030    2798.865970      -0.586041
    16         20984.7        2109.010010    2110.111820      -1.101910
    17         14126.7        1419.770020    1420.363890      -0.593853
    18          7271.30        730.590027     730.908875      -0.318829
    19             4.90000       0.090000       0.153999      -0.063999
    20             0.400000      0.040000      -0.298539       0.338538
    21          3838.00        385.920013     385.630157       0.289844
    22          7265.40        730.539978     730.315552       0.224445
    23         14116.8        1419.709960    1419.368160       0.341816
    24         20967.6        2108.949950    2108.391850       0.558002
    25         27818.6        2798.209960    2797.468020       0.741840
    26         34670.4        3487.489990    3486.655760       0.834125
    27         41521.0        4176.770020    4175.754880       1.015034
    28         48377.6        4866.100100    4865.489260       0.610737
    29         55231.2        5555.419920    5554.953610       0.466205
    30         62084.4        6244.779790    6244.409670       0.370014
    31         55232.6        5555.419920    5555.094240       0.325580
    32         48384.0        4866.100100    4866.133300      -0.033306
    33         41533.6        4176.770020    4177.021970      -0.252056
    34         34682.0        3487.489990    3487.822750      -0.332867
    35         27831.8        2798.209960    2798.795410      -0.585552
    36         20977.4        2108.949950    2109.377690      -0.427838
    37         14126.2        1419.709960    1420.313600      -0.603619
    38          7272.80        730.539978     731.059814      -0.519817
    39          3844.60        385.920013     386.293915      -0.373913
    40             5.40000       0.040000       0.204281      -0.164281
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      MEAN DEVIATION = -0.432690E-04
  STANDARD DEVIATION =  0.528148E+00


      
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
      

APPENDIX D:  SUMMARY OF FITS TO THE CTD LABORATORY TEMPERATURE DATA



-------------------
CTD10 TEMPERATURE
  PRE CRUISE 
-------------------
  PROGRAM VERSION   RUSCAL  910316  
        DISK FILE = 10mr92te.cal        
         VARIABLE = TEMPERATURE     
    5 DATA POINTS   ORDER OF POLY  2

  POLY COEF = 0.186416E-02 0.499864E-03 0.225955E-11 

              INSTRUMENT        OBSERVED      CALCULATED      DIFFERENCE
              ----------        ---------     ----------      ----------
     1         60034.8          30.019218      30.019215       0.000003
     2         45060.4          22.530518      22.530500       0.000016
     3         30038.4          15.018928      15.019004      -0.000076
     4         15429.6           7.715182       7.715096       0.000086
     5          1086.00          0.544688       0.544719      -0.000031
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      MEAN DEVIATION = -0.274321E-06
  STANDARD DEVIATION =  0.598524E-04



-------------------
CTD10 TEMPERATURE
  POST CRUISE 
-------------------
  PROGRAM VERSION   RUSCAL  910316  
        DISK FILE = C10E92TE.cal        
         VARIABLE = TEMPERATURE     
      DATA POINTS   ORDER OF POLY  2

  POLY COEF = -.803350E-03 0.499708E-03 0.310515E-11 

              INSTRUMENT        OBSERVED      CALCULATED      DIFFERENCE
              ----------        ---------     ----------      ----------
     1         60224.0          30.104589      30.104853      -0.000263
     2         48914.0          24.449780      24.449326       0.000454
     3         39992.0          19.989140      19.988472       0.000668
     4         30096.0          15.040070      15.041211      -0.001141
     5         19990.0           9.988570       9.989594      -0.001023
     6         10696.0           5.346520       5.344425       0.002095
     7           952.000         0.474130       0.474921      -0.000791
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      MEAN DEVIATION = -0.111917E-06
  STANDARD DEVIATION =  0.116087E-02



-------------------
CTD9 TEMPERATURE
  PRECRUISE FIT
-------------------
  PROGRAM VERSION   RUSCAL  910316  
        DISK FILE = C9AP92TE.cal        
         VARIABLE = TEMPERATURE     
    5 DATA POINTS   ORDER OF POLY  2

  POLY COEF = -.361583E-01 0.500248E-03 0.197920E-11 

              INSTRUMENT        OBSERVED      CALCULATED      DIFFERENCE
              ----------        ---------     ----------      ----------
     1         60039.6          30.005600      30.005671      -0.000070
     2         45048.4          22.503328      22.503235       0.000094
     3         30064.0          15.005210      15.005088       0.000122
     4         15066.0           7.500756       7.501028      -0.000272
     5          1181.60          0.555058       0.554938       0.000120
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      MEAN DEVIATION = -0.106618E-05
  STANDARD DEVIATION =  0.171104E-03



-------------------
CTD9 TEMPERATURE
  POST CRUISE 
-------------------
  PROGRAM VERSION   RUSCAL  910316  
        DISK FILE = C9SE92TE.cal        
         VARIABLE = TEMPERATURE     
    7 DATA POINTS   ORDER OF POLY  2

  POLY COEF = -.189004E-01 0.500366E-03 0.160650E-11 

              INSTRUMENT        OBSERVED      CALCULATED      DIFFERENCE
              ----------        ---------     ----------      ----------
     1         59366.0          29.691441      29.691519      -0.000078
     2         49798.0          24.902460      24.902334       0.000126
     3         40212.0          20.104509      20.104435       0.000075
     4         30183.0          15.084920      15.085126      -0.000206
     5         19074.0           9.525800       9.525675       0.000125
     6          9922.00          4.945820       4.945894      -0.000074
     7          2734.00          1.349150       1.349114       0.000036
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      MEAN DEVIATION = 0.755170E-06
  STANDARD DEVIATION = 0.124119E-03


      
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
      

APPENDIX E: SUMMARY OF FITS TO THE CTD CONDUCTIVITY LABORATORY DATA


                         BIAS          SLOPE       
                      ------------  ------------
   PRE-CRUISE  CTD10  -.177214E-2    .100631E-2 
               CTD9   -.231510E-1    .997986E-3 

   POST-CRUISE CTD10  -.163660E-02  0.100915E-02 
               CTD9   -.119142E-01  0.100050E-02 



-------------------
CTD10 CONDUCTIVITY
  PRECRUISE FIT
-------------------
  LABFIT: FHBIAS,Pslope
   0.00000000E-01   0.10000000
         MEAN CCR = 0.100626E-02   
    PRS ROOM TEMP = 19.99
  PROGRAM VERSION   RUSCAL  910316  
        DISK FILE = 10mr92co.cal        
         VARIABLE = CONDUCTIVITY    
    5 DATA POINTS   ORDER OF POLY  1

  POLY COEF = -.177214E-02 0.100631E-02 

              INSTRUMENT        OBSERVED      CALCULATED      DIFFERENCE
              ----------        ---------     ----------      ----------
     1         57872.2          58.235512      58.235428       0.000082
     2         46892.1          47.185162      47.186073      -0.000913
     3         41586.0          41.848011      41.846500       0.001509
     4         33214.6          33.421310      33.422283      -0.000974
     5         25064.2          25.220819      25.220535       0.000284
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      MEAN DEVIATION = -0.245608E-05
  STANDARD DEVIATION =  0.101838E-02



-------------------
CTD10 CONDUCTIVITY
  POSTCRUISE FIT
-------------------
  PROGRAM VERSION    RUSCAL  910316  
  DISK FILE = 10se92co.cal        
       VARIABLE=CONDUCTIVITY    
         5 DATA POINTS          ORDER OF POLY  1

  POLY COEF = -.163660E-02 0.100915E-02 

              INSTRUMENT        OBSERVED      CALCULATED      DIFFERENCE
     1         62200.1          62.767502      62.767540      -0.000038
     2         54831.1          55.331310      55.331127       0.000183
     3         41825.4          42.206329      42.206493      -0.000164
     4         34402.9          34.715900      34.716015      -0.000114
     5         25132.9          25.361401      25.361259       0.000141
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      MEAN DEVIATION = 0.161610E-05
  STANDARD DEVIATION = 0.154037E-03



------------------
CTD9 CONDUCTIVITY
  PRECRUISE FIT
-------------------
  LABFIT: FHBIAS,Pslope
   0.00000000E-01   0.10000000
         MEAN CCR = 0.997355E-03   
    PRS ROOM TEMP = 19.99
  PROGRAM VERSION   RUSCAL  910316  
        DISK FILE = C9AP92CO.cal        
         VARIABLE = CONDUCTIVITY    
    5 DATA POINTS   ORDER OF POLY  1

  POLY COEF = -.231510E-01 0.997986E-03 

              INSTRUMENT        OBSERVED      CALCULATED      DIFFERENCE
              ----------        ---------     ----------      ----------
     1         55291.9          55.158146      55.157375       0.000770
     2         45172.9          45.058846      45.058811       0.000034
     3         40757.0          40.650867      40.651749      -0.000882
     4         32971.0          32.880333      32.881477      -0.001145
     5         23982.6          23.912357      23.911146       0.001211
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      MEAN DEVIATION = -0.228733E-05
  STANDARD DEVIATION =  0.101834E-02



-------------------
CTD9 CONDUCTIVITY
  POSTCRUISE FIT
-------------------
  LABFIT: FHBIAS,Pslope
   0.00000000E-01   0.10000000
         MEAN CCR = 0.100018E-02   
    PRS ROOM TEMP = 19.99
  PROGRAM VERSION   RUSCAL  910316  
        DISK FILE = C9SE92CO.cal        
         VARIABLE = CONDUCTIVITY   
    5 DATA POINTS   ORDER OF POLY  1

  POLY COEF = -.119142E-01 0.100050E-02 

              INSTRUMENT        OBSERVED      CALCULATED      DIFFERENCE
              ----------        ---------     ----------      ----------
     1         58219.4          58.237228      58.236534       0.000695
     2         48291.3          48.303188      48.303532      -0.000342
     3         39531.9          39.539108      39.539745      -0.000636
     4         32529.1          32.532810      32.533413      -0.000602
     5         23647.8          23.648640      23.647747       0.000894
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      MEAN DEVIATION =  0.162441E-05
  STANDARD DEVIATION =  0.735835E-03


      
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
      

APPENDIX F: CTD CONDUCTIVITY FITTING APPLIED TO THE FINAL DATA

            KN138 Conductivity scalings applied to the final P06 data
            (fitting groups and fit statistics)


**********************************************
CTD10  CTD10  CTD10  CTD10  CTD10  CTD10
**********************************************


LEG 3  CTD10
       CHILE TO EASTER ISLAND 
       STATIONS 4-72

       Stations 4,5,9 to 19        Use fit of stations 6 to 19
         number of data points read in:    212
       STATIONS     6.   19.  PRES. BOUNDS    1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
        Applied cond. bias: -0.0016
        PASS No. =           8
            St.No.   ,  P,    T,     C,     COEFF.            GOOD
          1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.10062730E-02   0.935E+05
          2  1.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   -.19822450E-08    2.59    
         N=    175 AVE=   -0.85378E-06 STD. DEV.=    0.11202E-02
       
            STATION   COND. SLOPE
            ------- --------------
               6.   0.10062611E-02
               7.   0.10062591E-02
               8.   0.10062572E-02
               9.   0.10062552E-02
              10.   0.10062532E-02
              11.   0.10062512E-02
              12.   0.10062492E-02
              13.   0.10062472E-02
              14.   0.10062453E-02
              15.   0.10062433E-02
              16.   0.10062413E-02
              17.   0.10062393E-02
              18.   0.10062373E-02
              19.   0.10062354E-02
       
       Station 6 
         Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 6 ot 19) to match water 
         Sample data and CTD traces. new slope: 0.100624E-2
       
       Station 7 
         Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 6 to 19) to match water 
         Sample data and CTD traces. new slope: 0.100624E-2
       
       Station 8 
         Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 6 to 19) to match water 
         Sample data and CTD traces. new slope: 0.100624E-2
       
       Stations 22,23,24,28,29,31 to 40   Use fit of stations 20 to 40 
         number of data points read in: 309 

       STATIONS 20. 40. PRES. BOUNDS 1100.0 6500.0 edit= 2.8 
         Applied cond. bias: -0.0016 
         PASS No. = 5 
         St.No. , P, T, C, COEFF. GOOD 
         1    0.00    0.00    0.00    1.00    0.10062870E-02   0.312E+06 
         N= 292    AVE= -0.89956E-06    STD. DEV.= 0.17366E-02
       
       Station 20 
         Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 20 to 40) to match water 
         sample data and CTD traces. new slope: 0.100631E-2
       
       Station 21 
         Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 20 to 40) to match water 
         sample data and CTD traces. new slope: 0.100631E-2
       
       Station 25
         Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 20 to 40) to match water 
         sample data and CTD traces. new slope: 0.100627E-2
       
       Station 26 
         Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 20 to 40) to match water 
         sample data and CTD traces. new slope: 0.100627E-2
       
       Station 27 
         Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 20 to 40) to match water 
         sample data and CTD traces. new slope: 0.100627E-2
       
       Station 30 
         Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 20 to 40) to match water 
         sample data and CTD traces. new slope: 0.100624E-2
       
       Stations 41 to 55
         number of data points read in:    242
       STATIONS    41.   55.  PRES. BOUNDS    1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
        Applied cond. bias: -0.0016
        PASS No. =           5
            St.No. ,  P,    T,     C,     COEFF.            GOOD
          1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.10063006E-02   0.297E+06
         N=    230 AVE=    0.84329E-06 STD. DEV.=    0.16192E-02

       Stations 56 to 58,60 to 68    Use fit of stations 56 to 68
         number of data points read in:    203
       STATIONS    56.   68.  PRES. BOUNDS    1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
        Applied cond. bias: -0.0016
        PASS No. =           4
            St.No.,  P,    T,     C,     COEFF.            GOOD
          1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.10066862E-02   0.143E+05
          2  1.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   -.74668625E-08    6.59    
         N=    200 AVE=    0.61313E-06 STD. DEV.=    0.19213E-02
       
            STATION       COND. SLOPE
            -------     --------------
              56.       0.10062680E-02
              57.       0.10062606E-02
              58.       0.10062531E-02
              59.       0.10062456E-02
              60.       0.10062382E-02
              61.       0.10062307E-02
              62.       0.10062232E-02
              63.       0.10062157E-02
              64.       0.10062083E-02
              65.       0.10062008E-02
              66.       0.10061933E-02
              67.       0.10061859E-02
              68.       0.10061784E-02
       

       Station 59
         Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 56 to 68) to match water 
         sample data and CTD traces.
         new slope:  0.100635e-2
       
       Stations 69 to 75
         number of data points read in:     79
       STATIONS    69.   75.  PRES. BOUNDS    1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
        Applied cond. bias: -0.0016
        PASS No. =           4
            St.No. ,  P,    T,     C,     COEFF.            GOOD
          1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.10062813E-02   0.127E+06
         N=     76 AVE=    0.14307E-05 STD. DEV.=    0.21687E-02



LEG 4  CTD10
       EASTER ISLAND TO NEW ZEALAND   
       STATIONS 75 TO 188 (EXCEPT 76 TO 85, 112, 141, AND 187)


       Stations 87 to 101        Use fit of stations 86 to 101
         number of data points read in:    259
       STATIONS    86.  101.  PRES. BOUNDS    1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
        Applied cond. bias: -0.0016
        PASS No. =           7
            St.No. ,  P,    T,     C,     COEFF.            GOOD
          1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.10070056E-02   0.143E+05
          2  1.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   -.79787251E-08    10.6    
         N=    243 AVE=    0.13312E-05 STD. DEV.=    0.17053E-02
       
            STATION       COND. SLOPE
            -------     --------------
              86.       0.10063194E-02
              87.       0.10063114E-02
              88.       0.10063035E-02
              89.       0.10062955E-02
              90.       0.10062875E-02
              91.       0.10062795E-02
              92.       0.10062715E-02
              93.       0.10062636E-02
              94.       0.10062556E-02
              95.       0.10062476E-02
              96.       0.10062396E-02
              97.       0.10062317E-02
              98.       0.10062237E-02
              99.       0.10062157E-02
             100.       0.10062077E-02
             101.       0.10061997E-02

       Station 86
         Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 86 to 101) to match water 
         sample data and CTD traces.
         new slope:  0.100640e-2
       
       
       Stations 103 to 120        Use fit of stations 102 to 120
         number of data points read in:    324
       STATIONS   102.  120.  PRES. BOUNDS    1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
        Applied cond. bias: -0.0016
        PASS No. =           9
            St.No. ,  P,    T,     C,     COEFF.            GOOD
          1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.10063121E-02   0.325E+06
         N=    287 AVE=    0.93993E-06 STD. DEV.=    0.16520E-02
       
       Station 102
         Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 102 to 120) to match water 
         sample data and CTD traces.
         new slope:  0.100626e-2
       
       
       Stations 121      Use fit of stations 121 to 122
         number of data points read in:     43
       STATIONS   121.  122.  PRES. BOUNDS    1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
        Applied cond. bias: -0.0016
        PASS No. =           5
            St.No. ,  P,    T,     C,     COEFF.            GOOD
          1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.10062360E-02   0.730E+05
         N=     39 AVE=   -0.14327E-05 STD. DEV.=    0.27091E-02
       
       Station 122
         Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 121 to 122) to match water 
         sample data and CTD traces.
         new slope:  0.100634e-2
       
       
       Stations 123 to 136
         number of data points read in:    293
       STATIONS   123.  136.  PRES. BOUNDS    1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
        Applied cond. bias: -0.0016
        PASS No. =           8
            St.No. ,  P,    T,     C,     COEFF.            GOOD
          1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.10063488E-02   0.688E+06
         N=    263 AVE=    0.56917E-06 STD. DEV.=    0.74673E-03
       
       
       Stations 138 to 175        Use fit of stations 137 to 175
         number of data points read in:    880
       STATIONS   137.  175.  PRES. BOUNDS    1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
        Applied cond. bias: -0.0016
        PASS No. =           8
            St.No. ,  P,    T,     C,     COEFF.            GOOD
          1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.10064198E-02   0.115E+07
         N=    803 AVE=    0.70922E-07 STD. DEV.=    0.78187E-03
       
       
       Station 137
         Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 137 to 175) to match water 
         sample data and CTD traces.
         new slope:  0.100635e-2
       
       
       Stations 176 to 188
         number of data points read in:    219
       STATIONS   176.  188.  PRES. BOUNDS    1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
        Applied cond. bias: -0.0016
        PASS No. =           7
            St.No. ,  P,    T,     C,     COEFF.            GOOD
          1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.10061674E-02   0.107E+05
          2  1.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.15838572E-08    3.05    
         N=    200 AVE=    0.18406E-05 STD. DEV.=    0.88455E-03
       
            STATION       COND. SLOPE
            -------     --------------
             176.       0.10064462E-02
             177.       0.10064477E-02
             178.       0.10064493E-02
             179.       0.10064509E-02
             180.       0.10064525E-02
             181.       0.10064541E-02
             182.       0.10064557E-02
             183.       0.10064573E-02
             184.       0.10064588E-02
             185.       0.10064604E-02
             186.       0.10064620E-02
             187.       0.10064636E-02
             188.       0.10064652E-02
       
LEG 5  CTD10 
       NEW ZEALAND TO AUSTRALIA
       STATIONS 190 TO 246

       Stations 190 to 200
         number of data points read in:    165
       STATIONS   190.  200.  PRES. BOUNDS    1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
        Applied cond. bias: -0.0016
        PASS No. =           4
            St.No. ,  P,    T,     C,     COEFF.            GOOD
          1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.10084371E-02   0.426E+04
          2  1.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   -.10094641E-07    8.26    
         N=    156 AVE=    0.14242E-05 STD. DEV.=    0.14036E-02
       
            STATION      COND. SLOPE
            -------     --------------
             190.       0.10065191E-02
             191.       0.10065090E-02
             192.       0.10064989E-02
             193.       0.10064888E-02
             194.       0.10064787E-02
             195.       0.10064686E-02
             196.       0.10064585E-02
             197.       0.10064484E-02
             198.       0.10064383E-02
             199.       0.10064282E-02
             200.       0.10064181E-02
       
       Stations 201 to 219
         number of data points read in:    163
       STATIONS   201.  219.  PRES. BOUNDS    1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
        Applied cond. bias: -0.0016
        PASS No. =           5
            St.No. ,  P,    T,     C,     COEFF.            GOOD
          1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.10064438E-02   0.306E+06
         N=    152 AVE=    0.79471E-05 STD. DEV.=    0.12917E-02
       
       
       Station 220 to 246
         number of data points read in:    299
       STATIONS   220.  244.  PRES. BOUNDS    1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
        Applied cond. bias: -0.0016
        PASS No. =           8
            St.No. ,  P,    T,     C,     COEFF.            GOOD
          1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.10064778E-02   0.447E+06
         N=    271 AVE=    0.50069E-05 STD. DEV.=    0.11725E-02


      
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
      

********************************************************************
CTD9  CTD9  CTD9  CTD9  CTD9  CTD9  CTD9  CTD9  CTD9  CTD9  CTD9
********************************************************************

LEG 3  CTD9
       CHILE TO EASTER ISLAND
       NO STATIONS

LEG 4  CTD9
       EASTER ISLAND TO NEW ZEALAND
       STATIONS 76 TO 85

       Stations 76,78 to 85                 Use fit of stations 76 to 85
         number of data points read in:     162
       STATIONS    76.   85.  PRES. BOUNDS  1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
        Applied cond. bias: -0.0180
        PASS No. =           5
            St.No. , P,    T,   C,       COEFF.          GOOD
          1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.99750453E-03    0.104E+05
          2  1.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.75034637E-08    6.34    
         N=    148 AVE=   -0.15751E-05 STD. DEV.=       0.13061E-02
       
          STATION     COND. SLOPE
              76.  0.99807480E-03
              77.  0.99808230E-03
              78.  0.99808980E-03
              79.  0.99809731E-03
              80.  0.99810481E-03
              81.  0.99811231E-03
              82.  0.99811982E-03
              83.  0.99812732E-03
              84.  0.99813482E-03
              85.  0.99814233E-03
       
       Station 77
         Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 76 to 85) to match water 
         sample data and CTD traces.
         new slope:  0.998002e-3


LEG5  CTD9
      NEW ZEALAND TO AUSTRALIA
      STATIONS 248 TO 267

      Stations 249 to 257                  Use fit of stations 248 to 257
        number of data points read in:     35
      STATIONS   248.  255.  PRES. BOUNDS  1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
       Applied cond. bias: -0.0180
       PASS No. =           5
           St.No. , P,    T,   C,       COEFF.          GOOD
         1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.99814130E-03   0.163E+06
        N=     30 AVE=    0.17127E-05 STD. DEV.=      0.10655E-02
      
      
      Station 248
        Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 248 to 257) to match water 
        sample data and CTD traces.
        new slope:  0.998101e-3
      
      
      Stations 258 to 267
        number of data points read in:     34
      STATIONS   258.  265.  PRES. BOUNDS    1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
       Applied cond. bias: -0.0180
       PASS No. =           4
           St.No. , P,    T,     C,     COEFF.            GOOD
         1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.99818393E-03   0.921E+05
        N=     31 AVE=   -0.89016E-06 STD. DEV.=      0.19239E-02
      
      ************************************************************************

      Table of conductivity bias and slope versus station number used to reduce
      the P06 CTD data.
      
        sta     bias          slope
        ---  ------------  -----------
          4  -.162216E-02  0.100626E-02
          5  -.162216E-02  0.100626E-02
          6  -.162216E-02  0.100624E-02
          7  -.162216E-02  0.100624E-02
          8  -.162216E-02  0.100624E-02
          9  -.162216E-02  0.100626E-02
         10  -.162216E-02  0.100625E-02
         11  -.162216E-02  0.100625E-02
         12  -.162216E-02  0.100625E-02
         13  -.162216E-02  0.100625E-02
         14  -.162216E-02  0.100625E-02
         15  -.162216E-02  0.100624E-02
         16  -.162216E-02  0.100624E-02
         17  -.162216E-02  0.100624E-02
         18  -.162216E-02  0.100624E-02
         19  -.162216E-02  0.100624E-02
         20  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
         21  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
         22  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02
         23  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02
         24  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02
         25  -.162216E-02  0.100627E-02
         26  -.162216E-02  0.100627E-02
         27  -.162216E-02  0.100627E-02
         28  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02
         29  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02
         30  -.162216E-02  0.100624E-02
         31  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02
         32  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02
         33  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02
         34  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02
         35  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02
         36  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02

      
        sta     bias          slope
        ---  ------------  -----------
         37  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02
         38  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02
         39  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02
         40  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02
         41  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
         42  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
         43  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
         44  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
         45  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
         46  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
         47  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
         48  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
         49  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
         50  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
         51  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
         52  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
         53  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
         54  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
         55  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
         56  -.162216E-02  0.100627E-02
         57  -.162216E-02  0.100626E-02
         58  -.162216E-02  0.100625E-02
         59  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02
         60  -.162216E-02  0.100624E-02
         61  -.162216E-02  0.100623E-02
         62  -.162216E-02  0.100622E-02
         63  -.162216E-02  0.100622E-02
         64  -.162216E-02  0.100621E-02
         65  -.162216E-02  0.100620E-02
         66  -.162216E-02  0.100619E-02
         67  -.162216E-02  0.100619E-02
         68  -.162216E-02  0.100618E-02
         69  -.162216E-02  0.100628E-02
         70  -.162216E-02  0.100628E-02
         71  -.162216E-02  0.100628E-02
         72  -.162216E-02  0.100628E-02
         75  -.162216E-02  0.100628E-02
         76  -.179552E-01  0.998075E-03
      
        sta     bias          slope
        ---  ------------  -----------
         77  -.179552E-01  0.998002E-03
         78  -.179552E-01  0.998090E-03
         79  -.179552E-01  0.998097E-03
         80  -.179552E-01  0.998105E-03
         81  -.179552E-01  0.998112E-03
         82  -.179552E-01  0.998120E-03
         83  -.179552E-01  0.998127E-03
         84  -.179552E-01  0.998135E-03
         85  -.179552E-01  0.998142E-03
         86  -.162216E-02  0.100640E-02
         87  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
         88  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
         89  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
         90  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02
         91  -.162216E-02  0.100628E-02
         92  -.162216E-02  0.100627E-02
         93  -.162216E-02  0.100626E-02
         94  -.162216E-02  0.100626E-02
         95  -.162216E-02  0.100625E-02
         96  -.162216E-02  0.100624E-02
         97  -.162216E-02  0.100623E-02
         98  -.162216E-02  0.100622E-02
         99  -.162216E-02  0.100622E-02
        100  -.162216E-02  0.100621E-02
        101  -.162216E-02  0.100620E-02
        102  -.162216E-02  0.100626E-02
        103  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
        104  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
        105  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
        106  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
        107  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
        108  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
        109  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
        110  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
        111  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
        113  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
        114  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
        115  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
        116  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
        117  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
      
        sta     bias          slope
        ---  ------------  -----------
        118  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
        119  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
        120  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
        121  -.162216E-02  0.100626E-02
        122  -.162216E-02  0.100634E-02
        123  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02
        124  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02
        125  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02
        126  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02
        127  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02
        128  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02
        129  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02
        130  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02
        131  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02
        132  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02
        133  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02
        134  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02
        135  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02
        136  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02
        137  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02
        138  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        139  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        140  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        142  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        143  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        144  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        145  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        146  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        147  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        148  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        149  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        150  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        151  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        152  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        153  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        154  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        155  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        156  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
      
        sta     bias          slope
        ---  ------------  -----------
        157  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        158  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        159  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        160  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        161  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        162  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        163  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        164  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        165  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        166  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        167  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        168  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        169  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        170  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        171  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        172  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        173  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        174  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        175  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        176  -.162216E-02  0.100645E-02
        177  -.162216E-02  0.100645E-02
        178  -.162216E-02  0.100645E-02
        179  -.162216E-02  0.100645E-02
        180  -.162216E-02  0.100645E-02
        181  -.162216E-02  0.100645E-02
        182  -.162216E-02  0.100646E-02
        183  -.162216E-02  0.100646E-02
        184  -.162216E-02  0.100646E-02
        185  -.162216E-02  0.100646E-02
        186  -.162216E-02  0.100646E-02
        188  -.162216E-02  0.100647E-02
        190  -.162216E-02  0.100652E-02
        191  -.162216E-02  0.100651E-02
        192  -.162216E-02  0.100650E-02
        193  -.162216E-02  0.100649E-02
        194  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
        195  -.162216E-02  0.100647E-02
        196  -.162216E-02  0.100646E-02
        197  -.162216E-02  0.100645E-02
      
        sta     bias          slope
        ---  ------------  -----------
        198  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
        199  -.162216E-02  0.100643E-02
        200  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
        201  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
        202  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
        203  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
        204  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
        205  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
        206  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
        207  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
        208  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
        209  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
        210  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
        211  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
        212  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
        213  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
        214  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
        215  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
        216  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
        217  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
        218  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
        219  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
        220  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
        221  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
        222  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
        223  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
        224  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
        225  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
        226  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
        227  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
        228  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
        229  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
        230  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
        231  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
        232  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
        233  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
        234  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
        235  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
        236  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
      
        sta     bias          slope
        ---  ------------  -----------
        237  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
        238  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
        239  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
        240  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
        241  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
        242  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
        243  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
        244  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
        245  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
        246  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
        248  -.179552E-01  0.998101E-03
        249  -.179552E-01  0.998141E-03
        250  -.179552E-01  0.998141E-03
        251  -.179552E-01  0.998141E-03
        252  -.179552E-01  0.998141E-03
        253  -.179552E-01  0.998141E-03
        254  -.179552E-01  0.998141E-03
        255  -.179552E-01  0.998141E-03
        256  -.179552E-01  0.998141E-03
        257  -.179552E-01  0.998141E-03
        258  -.179552E-01  0.998184E-03
        259  -.179552E-01  0.998184E-03
        260  -.179552E-01  0.998184E-03
        261  -.179552E-01  0.998184E-03
        262  -.179552E-01  0.998184E-03
        263  -.179552E-01  0.998184E-03
        264  -.179552E-01  0.998184E-03
        265  -.179552E-01  0.998184E-03
        266  -.179552E-01  0.998184E-03
        267  -.179552E-01  0.998184E-03
      

      
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
      

APPENDIX G: FITS FOR CTD OXYGEN

*********************************************************************
CTD10  CTD10  CTD10  CTD10  CTD10  CTD10  CTD10  CTD10
*********************************************************************

LEG 3  CTD10
       CHILE TO EASTER ISLAND 
       STATIONS 4-72

Leg3 had an oxygen water pump attached to CTD 10. The data was
noisy, especially at the surface. More serious, fits to the water
sample data using data over the full water column were left with
significant depth dependance in the oxygen - water sample residuals.  
The pressure dependence in the fit was removed from the final data by
fitting the top and bottom water seperately.  All stations have one
calibration for the top 1000 dbar and a second calibration for the data
below 1000 dbar EXCEPT for stations 4,5,70,72-75.  Stations 4 and 5 do
not have data below 1000 dbar and stations 70, and 72-75 fit well with
one calibration for the entire depth. Stations 72-75 and perhaps 70 did
not use the oxygen pump.  Operationally a full water column fit was
performed and the derived parameters applied to the top 1000 m of the
water column to obtain one estimate of the oxygen profile.  Next a fit
was done only to the data below 1000 db, and these parameters used to
derive a second oxygen profile estimate.  The reported profile is a
blend of these with a linear overlap region within 100 dbar vertically of
1000 db.


FIT STATISTICS:

Station 4
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch   0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   1 Min/Max Sta: 4.-4.  1 StdDev: 0.1600E+00 No. Obs: 10  dOx: .448
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.073 0.1428E-02 -.6485E-02  -0.0324   0.75   8.00   0.0000E+00


Station 5               Use fit of stations 4 and 5
 Edit Fact=  2.00 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   2 Min/Max Sta: 4.-5.  1 StdDev: 0.2461E+00 No. Obs: 22  dOx: .492
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.154 0.1230E-02 0.3078E-03  -0.0319   0.75   8.00   0.0000E+00


SHALLOW Stations 6 to 11
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   7 Min/Max Sta: 6.-11.  1 StdDev: 0.1015E+00 No. Obs: 122  dOx: 0.254
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.007 0.1089E-02 0.1761E-03  -0.0234   0.75   8.00   0.0000E+00


DEEP Stations 6 to 11
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   3 Min/Max Sta: 6.-11.  1 StdDev: 0.2525E-01 No. Obs: 49  dOx: 0.071
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.026 0.1245E-02 0.1487E-03  -0.0473   0.75   8.00   0.1721E-02

Station No. =     6  Bias = -.0157
Station No. =     7  Bias = -.0139
Station No. =     8  Bias = -.0122
Station No. =     9  Bias = -.0105
Station No. =    10  Bias = -.0088
Station No. =    11  Bias = -.0071


Station 6
  Manually adjusted bias of calculated oxygen in CTD and SEA file by -.04
  ml/l oxygen, to match water samlple data and CTD traces.


SHALLOW    Stations 12 to 21
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
  13 Min/Max Sta: 12.-21.  1 StdDev: 0.4677E-01 No. Obs: 217  dOx: 0.117
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.019 0.1058E-02 0.1596E-03  -0.0222   0.95   3.80   0.0000E+00


DEEP    Staions 12 to 21
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   4 Min/Max Sta: 12.-21.  1 StdDev: 0.2461E-01 No. Obs: 144  dOx: 0.069
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.018 0.1156E-02 0.1424E-03  -0.0412   0.95   4.00   0.0000E+00


SHALLOW      Stations 22 to 25
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
  16 Min/Max Sta: 22.-25.  1 StdDev: 0.4481E-01 No. Obs: 87  dOx: 0.112
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.036 0.9957E-03 0.1607E-03  -0.0197   0.95   3.70   0.0000E+00


DEEP      Stations 22 to 25
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   7 Min/Max Sta: 22.-25.  1 StdDev: 0.1040E-01 No. Obs: 46  dOx: 0.029
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.012 0.1204E-02 0.1404E-03  -0.0467   0.95   4.00   0.0000E+00


SHALLOW      Stations 26 to 32
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   9 Min/Max Sta: 26.-32.  1 StdDev: 0.6487E-01 No. Obs: 187  dOx: 0.162
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.027 0.1048E-02 0.1573E-03  -0.0251   0.75   8.00   0.0000E+00


DEEP      Stations 26 to 32
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   5 Min/Max Sta: 26.-32.  1 StdDev: 0.2109E-01 No. Obs: 98  dOx: 0.059
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.015 0.1241E-02 0.1324E-03  -0.0557   0.75   8.00   0.0000E+00


SHALLOW      Stations 33 to 38
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   7 Min/Max Sta: 33.-38.  1 StdDev: 0.5781E-01 No. Obs: 165  dOx: 0.145
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.029 0.1032E-02 0.1603E-03  -0.0219   0.75   8.00   0.0000E+00


DEEP      Stations 33 to 38
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
  10 Min/Max Sta: 33.-38.  1 StdDev: 0.1144E-01 No. Obs: 80  dOx: 0.029
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.005 0.1241E-02 0.1384E-03  -0.0494   0.75   8.00   0.0000E+00


SHALLOW      Stations 39 to 42
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
  11 Min/Max Sta: 39.-42.  1 StdDev: 0.6401E-01 No. Obs: 110  dOx: 0.160
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.044 0.1001E-02 0.1490E-03  -0.0207   0.95   6.40   0.0000E+00


DEEP      Stations 39 to 42
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   4 Min/Max Sta: 39.-42.  1 StdDev: 0.2435E-01 No. Obs: 60  dOx: 0.068
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.016 0.1206E-02 0.1328E-03  -0.0475   0.95   6.50   0.0000E+00


SHALLOW      Stations 43 to 45
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   9 Min/Max Sta: 43.-45.  1 StdDev: 0.4373E-01 No. Obs: 82  dOx: 0.109
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.036 0.1017E-02 0.1543E-03  -0.0202   0.95   4.40   0.0000E+00


DEEP      Stations 43 to 45
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   4 Min/Max Sta: 43.-45.  1 StdDev: 0.1951E-01 No. Obs: 42  dOx: 0.049
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.015 0.1205E-02 0.1337E-03  -0.0443   0.95   4.50   0.0000E+00


SHALLOW      Stations 46 to 56        Use fit of stations 46 to 57
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
  10 Min/Max Sta: 46.-57.  1 StdDev: 0.5963E-01 No. Obs: 343  dOx: 0.149
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.036 0.1024E-02 0.1534E-03  -0.0228   0.75   8.00   0.0000E+00


SHALLOW   Station 57 
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   5 Min/Max Sta: 57.-57.  1 StdDev: 0.3000E-01 No. Obs: 32  dOx: 0.084
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.016 0.1072E-02 0.1612E-03  -0.0247   1.00   8.56   0.0000E+00


DEEP      Stations 46 to 57
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   9 Min/Max Sta: 46.-57.  1 StdDev: 0.1570E-01 No. Obs: 176  dOx: 0.044
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.008 0.1206E-02 0.1418E-03  -0.0446   0.75   8.00   0.0000E+00


SHALLOW      Stations 58 to 61
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
  10 Min/Max Sta: 58.-61.  1 StdDev: 0.4268E-01 No. Obs: 111  dOx: 0.107
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.029 0.1045E-02 0.1551E-03  -0.0234   0.95  11.60   0.0000E+00


DEEP      Stations 58 to 61

Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   3 Min/Max Sta: 58.-61.  1 StdDev: 0.1469E-01 No. Obs: 63  dOx: 0.041
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.004 0.1219E-02 0.1454E-03  -0.0394   0.95  11.60   0.0000E+00


SHALLOW      Stations 62,64 to 68
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
  11 Min/Max Sta: 62.-68.  1 StdDev: 0.3513E-01 No. Obs: 171  dOx: 0.088
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.043 0.1044E-02 0.1411E-03  -0.0236   0.95   5.60   0.0000E+00


DEEP       Stations 62 to 68 (63 included)
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   3 Min/Max Sta: 62.-68.  1 StdDev: 0.1604E-01 No. Obs: 103  dOx: 0.045
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.021 0.1251E-02 0.1544E-03  -0.0399   0.95   6.00   0.0000E+00


SHALLOW      Station 63
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   5 Min/Max Sta: 63.-63.  1 StdDev: 0.5965E-01 No. Obs: 29  dOx: 0.149
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.043 0.1057E-02 0.1420E-03  -0.0241   0.95   7.50   0.0000E+00


DEEP       Station 62 to 68 (Station 63 included)
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   3 Min/Max Sta: 62.-68.  1 StdDev: 0.1604E-01 No. Obs: 103  dOx: 0.045
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.021 0.1251E-02 0.1544E-03  -0.0399   0.95   6.00   0.0000E+00


SHALLOW      Stations 69 and 71
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   5 Min/Max Sta: 69.-71.  1 StdDev: 0.4604E-01 No. Obs: 62  dOx: 0.115
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.032 0.1058E-02 0.1494E-03  -0.0244   0.95   9.00   0.0000E+00


DEEP      Stations 69 to 71
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   3 Min/Max Sta: 69.-71.  1 StdDev: 0.1487E-01 No. Obs: 30  dOx: 0.037
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.034 0.1301E-02 0.1543E-03  -0.0446   0.95   9.00   0.0000E+00


Station 70
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   3 Min/Max Sta: 70.-70.  1 StdDev: 0.1582E-01 No. Obs: 33  dOx: 0.040
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.018 0.1114E-02 0.1572E-03  -0.0265   0.75   8.00   0.0000E+00


Stations 72 to 75
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   9 Min/Max Sta: 72.-75.  1 StdDev: 0.2478E-01 No. Obs: 54  dOx: 0.062
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.043 0.1032E-02 0.1469E-03  -0.0226   0.95   9.00   0.0000E+00



LEG 4  EASTER ISLAND TO NEW ZEALAND
       STATIONS 75 TO 188 (EXCEPT 76 TO 85, 112, 141, AND 187)


MISSING STATION 110 (files not present)

Station 86 to 92
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   7 Min/Max Sta: 86.-92.  1 StdDev: 0.3403E-01 No. Obs: 225  dOx: .095
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.003 0.1109E-02 0.1495E-03  -0.0267   0.77  10.54   0.2013E-03

Station No. =    86  Bias = 0.0207
Station No. =    87  Bias = 0.0209
Station No. =    88  Bias = 0.0211
Station No. =    89  Bias = 0.0213
Station No. =    90  Bias = 0.0215
Station No. =    91  Bias = 0.0217
Station No. =    92  Bias = 0.0219


Station 93 to 97
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   8 Min/Max Sta: 93.-97.  1 StdDev: 0.3510E-01 No. Obs: 157  dOx: 0.088
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.085 0.1102E-02 0.1484E-03  -0.0272   0.70  10.05   -.6505E-03

Station No. =    93  Bias = 0.0242
Station No. =    94  Bias = 0.0236
Station No. =    95  Bias = 0.0229
Station No. =    96  Bias = 0.0223
Station No. =    97  Bias = 0.0216


Station 93 to 103
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
  17 Min/Max Sta: 98.-103.  1 StdDev: 0.2703E-01 No. Obs: 173  dOx: 0.076
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.009 0.1083E-02 0.1426E-03  -0.0271   0.63   4.90   0.2407E-03

Station No. =    98  Bias = 0.0326
Station No. =    99  Bias = 0.0328
Station No. =   100  Bias = 0.0330
Station No. =   101  Bias = 0.0333
Station No. =   102  Bias = 0.0335
Station No. =   103  Bias = 0.0338


Station 104 to 106
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   7 Min/Max Sta: 104.-106.  1 StdDev: 0.2727E-01 No. Obs: 93  dOx: 0.076
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.019 0.1115E-02 0.1486E-03  -0.0279   0.70   8.01   0.3648E-03

Station No. =   104  Bias = 0.0189
Station No. =   105  Bias = 0.0193
Station No. =   106  Bias = 0.0196


Station 107 to 109
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   6 Min/Max Sta: 107.-109.  1 StdDev: 0.2736E-01 No. Obs: 93  dOx: 0.077
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.004 0.1112E-02 0.1457E-03  -0.0274   0.70   8.00   0.2605E-03

Station No. =   107  Bias = 0.0243
Station No. =   108  Bias = 0.0245
Station No. =   109  Bias = 0.0248


Station 110, 111        Use fit of Station 111
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   5 Min/Max Sta: 111.-111.  1 StdDev: 0.4520E-01 No. Obs: 26  dOx: 0.127
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.034 0.1071E-02 0.1452E-03  -0.0260   0.75   8.00   0.0000E+00


Station 113, 114        Use fit of stations 111,113,114
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   8 Min/Max Sta: 111.-114.  1 StdDev: 0.4247E-01 No. Obs: 85  dOx: 0.119
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.012 0.1087E-02 0.1402E-03  -0.0264   0.70   7.50   0.2076E-03

Station No. =   111  Bias = 0.0351
Station No. =   112  Bias = 0.0353
Station No. =   113  Bias = 0.0355
Station No. =   114  Bias = 0.0357


Station 115, 117 to 119
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   9 Min/Max Sta: 115.-119.  1 StdDev: 0.2686E-01 No. Obs: 123  dOx: 0.075
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.056 0.1080E-02 0.1421E-03  -0.0260   0.70   7.48   -.1708E-03

Station No. =   115  Bias = 0.0366
Station No. =   116  Bias = 0.0364
Station No. =   117  Bias = 0.0362
Station No. =   118  Bias = 0.0361
Station No. =   119  Bias = 0.0359


Station 116

Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   5 Min/Max Sta: 116.-116.  1 StdDev: 0.2690E-01 No. Obs: 30  dOx: 0.075
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.012 0.1139E-02 0.1486E-03  -0.0301   0.70   7.00   0.0000E+00


Station 120 to 123        Use fit of stations 120 to 124
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
  10 Min/Max Sta: 120.-124.  1 StdDev: 0.2269E-01 No. Obs: 138  dOx: 0.057
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.029 0.1116E-02 0.1465E-03  -0.0273   0.68   7.00   -.6418E-04

Station No. =   120  Bias = 0.0213
Station No. =   121  Bias = 0.0212
Station No. =   122  Bias = 0.0211
Station No. =   123  Bias = 0.0211
Station No. =   124  Bias = 0.0210


Station 124
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   3 Min/Max Sta: 124.-124.  1 StdDev: 0.1921E-01 No. Obs: 34  dOx: 0.054
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.017 0.1117E-02 0.1510E-03  -0.0272   0.64   6.86   0.0000E+00


Station 125 to 126
 Edit Fact=  2.30 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
  16 Min/Max Sta: 125.-126.  1 StdDev: 0.2032E-01 No. Obs: 40  dOx: 0.047
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.007 0.1167E-02 0.1500E-03  -0.0288   0.78   8.00   0.0000E+00


Station 127 to 130
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   5 Min/Max Sta: 127.-130.  1 StdDev: 0.2907E-01 No. Obs: 131  dOx: 0.081
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.006 0.1154E-02 0.1501E-03  -0.0287   0.75   8.00   0.1250E-03

Station No. =   127  Bias = 0.0094
Station No. =   128  Bias = 0.0095
Station No. =   129  Bias = 0.0097
Station No. =   130  Bias = 0.0098


Station 131 to 135
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   7 Min/Max Sta: 131.-135.  1 StdDev: 0.2351E-01 No. Obs: 146  dOx: 0.059
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.007 0.1161E-02 0.1497E-03  -0.0288   0.76   8.00   0.1174E-03

Station No. =   131  Bias = 0.0083
Station No. =   132  Bias = 0.0084
Station No. =   133  Bias = 0.0085
Station No. =   134  Bias = 0.0086
Station No. =   135  Bias = 0.0088


Station 136
 Edit Fact=  2.00 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    4000.00000000
   8 Min/Max Sta: 136.-136.  1 StdDev: 0.1063E-01 No. Obs: 30  dOx: 0.021
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.003 0.1180E-02 0.1518E-03  -0.0299   0.64   8.00   0.0000E+00


Station 137 to 140, 142 to 144
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   6 Min/Max Sta: 137.-144.  1 StdDev: 0.3574E-01 No. Obs: 215  dOx: 0.100
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.000 0.1189E-02 0.1487E-03  -0.0299   0.81   8.68   0.1720E-04

Station No. =   137  Bias = 0.0028
Station No. =   138  Bias = 0.0028
Station No. =   139  Bias = 0.0028
Station No. =   140  Bias = 0.0028
Station No. =   141  Bias = 0.0029
Station No. =   142  Bias = 0.0029
Station No. =   143  Bias = 0.0029
Station No. =   144  Bias = 0.0029


Station 145 to 150
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   5 Min/Max Sta: 145.-150.  1 StdDev: 0.3730E-01 No. Obs: 225  dOx: 0.093
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.010 0.1172E-02 0.1470E-03  -0.0307   0.75   8.00   0.0000E+00


Station 151 to 155
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   8 Min/Max Sta: 151.-155.  1 StdDev: 0.2762E-01 No. Obs: 147  dOx: 0.077
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.001 0.1189E-02 0.1469E-03  -0.0297   0.79  15.15   0.4069E-04

Station No. =   151  Bias = 0.0075
Station No. =   152  Bias = 0.0076
Station No. =   153  Bias = 0.0076
Station No. =   154  Bias = 0.0077
Station No. =   155  Bias = 0.0077


Station 156 
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   4 Min/Max Sta: 156.-156.  1 StdDev: 0.2703E-01 No. Obs: 30  dOx: 0.076
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.007 0.1195E-02 0.1458E-03  -0.0309   0.72  23.15   0.0000E+00


Station 157 to 159
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   6 Min/Max Sta: 157.-159.  1 StdDev: 0.2792E-01 No. Obs: 85  dOx: 0.070
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.004 0.1207E-02 0.1467E-03  -0.0305   0.80  15.35   0.0000E+00


Station 160 to 162
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   7 Min/Max Sta: 160.-162.  1 StdDev: 0.3854E-01 No. Obs: 105  dOx: 0.096
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.014 0.1183E-02 0.1445E-03  -0.0299   0.81   9.09   0.0000E+00


Station 163
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   4 Min/Max Sta: 163.-163.  1 StdDev: 0.1831E-01 No. Obs: 29  dOx: 0.046
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.002 0.1224E-02 0.1471E-03  -0.0325   0.70   9.00   0.0000E+00


Station 164 to 167
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   7 Min/Max Sta: 164.-167.  1 StdDev: 0.3208E-01 No. Obs: 114  dOx: 0.090
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.031 0.1161E-02 0.1458E-03  -0.0290   0.74   4.68   -.9247E-04

Station No. =   164  Bias = 0.0155
Station No. =   165  Bias = 0.0154
Station No. =   166  Bias = 0.0153
Station No. =   167  Bias = 0.0152


Stations 168 to 170
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   5 Min/Max Sta: 168.-170.  1 StdDev: 0.3139E-01 No. Obs: 93  dOx: 0.088
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.003 0.1194E-02 0.1469E-03  -0.0303   0.82   3.00   0.4917E-04

Station No. =   168  Bias = 0.0057
Station No. =   169  Bias = 0.0058
Station No. =   170  Bias = 0.0058


Stations 171 to 174
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
  18 Min/Max Sta: 171.-174.  1 StdDev: 0.2560E-01 No. Obs: 90  dOx: 0.072
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.001 0.1270E-02 0.1453E-03  -0.0393   0.90   3.00   -.4661E-04

Station No. =   171  Bias = -.0091
Station No. =   172  Bias = -.0092
Station No. =   173  Bias = -.0092
Station No. =   174  Bias = -.0093


Stations 175 to 178
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   8 Min/Max Sta: 175.-178.  1 StdDev: 0.6433E-01 No. Obs: 127  dOx: 0.180
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.016 0.1175E-02 0.1447E-03  -0.0296   0.90   3.00   0.0000E+00


Station 179 to 182
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   5 Min/Max Sta: 179.-182.  1 StdDev: 0.6177E-01 No. Obs: 119  dOx: 0.173
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.016 0.1085E-02 0.1546E-03  -0.0244   0.84   3.00   0.5458E-04

Station No. =   179  Bias = 0.0258
Station No. =   180  Bias = 0.0259
Station No. =   181  Bias = 0.0260
Station No. =   182  Bias = 0.0260


Stations 183 to 184
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   4 Min/Max Sta: 183.-184.  1 StdDev: 0.3034E-01 No. Obs: 52  dOx: 0.085
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.040 0.1083E-02 0.1346E-03  -0.0249   0.95   8.00   0.0000E+00


Stations 185 to 188
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   9 Min/Max Sta: 185.-188.  1 StdDev: 0.3887E-01 No. Obs: 81  dOx: 0.097
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.112 0.1136E-02 0.1480E-03  -0.0269   0.87   8.00   -.5249E-03

Station No. =   185  Bias = 0.0150
Station No. =   186  Bias = 0.0145
Station No. =   187  Bias = 0.0140
Station No. =   188  Bias = 0.0135



LEG5  CTD 10
      NEW ZEALAND TO AUSTRALIA 
      STATIONS 190 TO 246


Station 190 to 194
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   7 Min/Max Sta: 190.-194.  1 StdDev: 0.2064E-01 No. Obs: 152  dOx: 0.058
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.005 0.1071E-02 0.1290E-03  -0.0261   0.72   1.20   0.2826E-03

Station No. =   190  Bias = 0.0486
Station No. =   191  Bias = 0.0489
Station No. =   192  Bias = 0.0492
Station No. =   193  Bias = 0.0495
Station No. =   194  Bias = 0.0498


Stations 195 to 201    Use fit of stations 190 to 201
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   9 Min/Max Sta: 190.-201.  1 StdDev: 0.2944E-01 No. Obs: 317  dOx: 0.082
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.002 0.1100E-02 0.1347E-03  -0.0273   0.75   5.10   0.1808E-03

Station No. =   190  Bias = 0.0361
Station No. =   191  Bias = 0.0363
Station No. =   192  Bias = 0.0365
Station No. =   193  Bias = 0.0367
Station No. =   194  Bias = 0.0368
Station No. =   195  Bias = 0.0370
Station No. =   196  Bias = 0.0372
Station No. =   197  Bias = 0.0374
Station No. =   198  Bias = 0.0376
Station No. =   199  Bias = 0.0377
Station No. =   200  Bias = 0.0379
Station No. =   201  Bias = 0.0381


Stations 202 to 211
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   4 Min/Max Sta: 202.-211.  1 StdDev: 0.3065E-01 No. Obs: 189  dOx: 0.086
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.026 0.1063E-02 0.1307E-03  -0.0253   0.73   5.10   0.1343E-03

Station No. =   202  Bias = 0.0531
Station No. =   203  Bias = 0.0532
Station No. =   204  Bias = 0.0533
Station No. =   205  Bias = 0.0535
Station No. =   206  Bias = 0.0536
Station No. =   207  Bias = 0.0537
Station No. =   208  Bias = 0.0539
Station No. =   209  Bias = 0.0540
Station No. =   210  Bias = 0.0541
Station No. =   211  Bias = 0.0543


Station 212 to 221
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   6 Min/Max Sta: 212.-221.  1 StdDev: 0.2997E-01 No. Obs: 198  dOx: 0.084
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.012 0.1076E-02 0.1388E-03  -0.0256   0.74   8.59   0.1357E-03

Station No. =   212  Bias = 0.0406
Station No. =   213  Bias = 0.0407
Station No. =   214  Bias = 0.0409
Station No. =   215  Bias = 0.0410
Station No. =   216  Bias = 0.0412
Station No. =   217  Bias = 0.0413
Station No. =   218  Bias = 0.0414
Station No. =   219  Bias = 0.0416
Station No. =   220  Bias = 0.0417
Station No. =   221  Bias = 0.0418


Station 222 to 231
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   8 Min/Max Sta: 222.-231.  1 StdDev: 0.2690E-01 No. Obs: 169  dOx: 0.075
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.025 0.1069E-02 0.1579E-03  -0.0249   0.82   9.18   0.1949E-04

Station No. =   222  Bias = 0.0290
Station No. =   223  Bias = 0.0290
Station No. =   224  Bias = 0.0291
Station No. =   225  Bias = 0.0291
Station No. =   226  Bias = 0.0291
Station No. =   227  Bias = 0.0291
Station No. =   228  Bias = 0.0291
Station No. =   229  Bias = 0.0292
Station No. =   230  Bias = 0.0292
Station No. =   231  Bias = 0.0292


Stations 232 to 240
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   6 Min/Max Sta: 232.-240.  1 StdDev: 0.4332E-01 No. Obs: 285  dOx: 0.121
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.005 0.1149E-02 0.1490E-03  -0.0284   0.90  10.00   0.7517E-04

Station No. =   232  Bias = 0.0127
Station No. =   233  Bias = 0.0128
Station No. =   234  Bias = 0.0128
Station No. =   235  Bias = 0.0129
Station No. =   236  Bias = 0.0130
Station No. =   237  Bias = 0.0131
Station No. =   238  Bias = 0.0131
Station No. =   239  Bias = 0.0132
Station No. =   240  Bias = 0.0133


Stations 241 to 246
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   6 Min/Max Sta: 241.-246.  1 StdDev: 0.3474E-01 No. Obs: 79  dOx: 0.097
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.015 0.1071E-02 0.1636E-03  -0.0250   0.85   3.17   0.4869E-04

Station No. =   241  Bias = 0.0264
Station No. =   242  Bias = 0.0264
Station No. =   243  Bias = 0.0265
Station No. =   244  Bias = 0.0265
Station No. =   245  Bias = 0.0266
Station No. =   246  Bias = 0.0266


Station 246
Manually adjusted bias of calculated oxygen in CTD and SEA file by 
+0.1 ml/l oxygen, to match water samlple data and CTD traces.



*********************************************************************
CTD09    CTD09    CTD09    CTD09    CTD09    CTD09    CTD09    CTD09
*********************************************************************

LEG3  CTD 09
      CHILE TO EASTER ISLAND
      STATION 3

Station 3
 Edit Fact=  2.00 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   8 Min/Max Sta: 3.-3.  1 StdDev: 0.3573E-01 No. Obs: 21  dOx: .071
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.007 0.9272E-03 0.1697E-03  -0.0285   0.90  10.00   0.0000E+00


LEG4  CTD 09
      EASTER ISLAND TO NEW ZEALAND
      STATIONS 76 TO 85 , not including duplicate stations 112, 141, and 187


Stations 76 to 78
 Edit Fact=  2.30 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
  16 Min/Max Sta: 76.-78.  1 StdDev: 0.1369E-01 No. Obs: 74  dOx: 0.031
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.011 0.8891E-03 0.1654E-03  -0.0284   0.60  10.00   0.0000E+00


Stations 79, 81 to 85        Use fit of stations 76 to 79, 81 to 85
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1500.00000000
   9 Min/Max Sta: 76.-85.  1 StdDev: 0.3899E-01 No. Obs: 286  dOx: .109
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.020 0.8835E-03 0.1597E-03  -0.0286   0.59   9.17   0.0000E+00


Station 80 
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   2 Min/Max Sta: 80.-80.  1 StdDev: 0.6161E-01 No. Obs: 35  dOx: 0.172
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.004 0.8364E-03 0.2127E-03  -0.0247   0.48   9.20   0.0000E+00



LEG5  CTD 09
      NEW ZEALAND TO AUSTRALIA
      STATIONS 248 TO 267, not including duplicate stations 189, 247


Stations 248 to 257    Use fit of stations 249-255
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   4 Min/Max Sta: 249.-255.  1 StdDev: 0.4877E-01 No. Obs: 49  dOx: .122
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.012 0.8430E-03 0.1556E-03  -0.0288   0.50   6.90   0.9029E-04

Station No. =   249  Bias = 0.0349
Station No. =   250  Bias = 0.0350
Station No. =   251  Bias = 0.0351
Station No. =   252  Bias = 0.0352
Station No. =   253  Bias = 0.0353
Station No. =   254  Bias = 0.0354
Station No. =   255  Bias = 0.0355


Stations 258 to 267    Use fit of stations 258-264
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   4 Min/Max Sta: 258.-264.  1 StdDev: 0.6324E-01 No. Obs: 48  dOx: 0.158
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.003 0.8746E-03 0.1615E-03  -0.0293   0.55  10.67   0.7379E-04

Station No. =   258  Bias = 0.0220
Station No. =   259  Bias = 0.0221
Station No. =   260  Bias = 0.0221
Station No. =   261  Bias = 0.0222
Station No. =   262  Bias = 0.0223
Station No. =   263  Bias = 0.0223
Station No. =   264  Bias = 0.0224


Station 256
  Manually adjusted bias of calculated oxygen in CTD and SEA file by
  -0.1 ml/l oxygen, to match water samlple data and CTD traces.


TABLE 16: gives the calibration scaling factors used to derive CTD oxygen data on P06 

sta      bias        slope          pcor         tcor          wt           lag
---  ------------  ----------- ------------  ------------  -----------  -----------
  4   .730000E-01  .142800E-02 -.648500E-02  -.324000E-01  .750000E-01  .800000E+01
  5  -.154000E+00  .123000E-02  .307800E-03  -.319000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
  6  -.700000E-02  .108900E-02  .176100E-03  -.234000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
  7  -.700000E-02  .108900E-02  .176100E-03  -.234000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
  8  -.700000E-02  .108900E-02  .176100E-03  -.234000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
  9  -.700000E-02  .108900E-02  .176100E-03  -.234000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
 10  -.700000E-02  .108900E-02  .176100E-03  -.234000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
 11  -.700000E-02  .108900E-02  .176100E-03  -.234000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
 12   .190000E-01  .105800E-02  .159600E-03  -.222000E-01  .950000E+00  .380000E+01
 13   .190000E-01  .105800E-02  .159600E-03  -.222000E-01  .950000E+00  .380000E+01
 14   .190000E-01  .105800E-02  .159600E-03  -.222000E-01  .950000E+00  .380000E+01
 15   .190000E-01  .105800E-02  .159600E-03  -.222000E-01  .950000E+00  .380000E+01
 16   .190000E-01  .105800E-02  .159600E-03  -.222000E-01  .950000E+00  .380000E+01
 17   .190000E-01  .105800E-02  .159600E-03  -.222000E-01  .950000E+00  .380000E+01
 18   .190000E-01  .105800E-02  .159600E-03  -.222000E-01  .950000E+00  .380000E+01
 19   .190000E-01  .105800E-02  .159600E-03  -.222000E-01  .950000E+00  .380000E+01
 20   .190000E-01  .105800E-02  .159600E-03  -.222000E-01  .950000E+00  .380000E+01
 21   .190000E-01  .105800E-02  .159600E-03  -.222000E-01  .950000E+00  .380000E+01
 22   .360000E-01  .995700E-03  .160700E-03  -.197000E-01  .950000E+00  .370000E+01
 23   .360000E-01  .995700E-03  .160700E-03  -.197000E-01  .950000E+00  .370000E+01
 24   .360000E-01  .995700E-03  .160700E-03  -.197000E-01  .950000E+00  .370000E+01
 25   .360000E-01  .995700E-03  .160700E-03  -.197000E-01  .950000E+00  .370000E+01
 26   .270000E-01  .104800E-02  .157300E-03  -.251000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
 27   .270000E-01  .104800E-02  .157300E-03  -.251000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
 28   .270000E-01  .104800E-02  .157300E-03  -.251000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
 29   .270000E-01  .104800E-02  .157300E-03  -.251000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
 30   .270000E-01  .104800E-02  .157300E-03  -.251000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
 31   .270000E-01  .104800E-02  .157300E-03  -.251000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
 32   .270000E-01  .104800E-02  .157300E-03  -.251000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
 33   .290000E-01  .103200E-02  .160300E-03  -.219000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
 34   .290000E-01  .103200E-02  .160300E-03  -.219000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01

sta      bias        slope          pcor         tcor          wt           lag
---  ------------  ----------- ------------  ------------  -----------  -----------
 35   .290000E-01  .103200E-02  .160300E-03  -.219000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
 36   .290000E-01  .103200E-02  .160300E-03  -.219000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
 37   .290000E-01  .103200E-02  .160300E-03  -.219000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
 38   .290000E-01  .103200E-02  .160300E-03  -.219000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
 39   .440000E-01  .100100E-02  .149000E-03  -.207000E-01  .950000E+00  .640000E+01
 40   .440000E-01  .100100E-02  .149000E-03  -.207000E-01  .950000E+00  .640000E+01
 41   .440000E-01  .100100E-02  .149000E-03  -.207000E-01  .950000E+00  .640000E+01
 42   .440000E-01  .100100E-02  .149000E-03  -.207000E-01  .950000E+00  .640000E+01
 43   .360000E-01  .101700E-02  .154300E-03  -.202000E-01  .950000E+00  .440000E+01
 44   .360000E-01  .101700E-02  .154300E-03  -.202000E-01  .950000E+00  .440000E+01
 45   .360000E-01  .101700E-02  .154300E-03  -.202000E-01  .950000E+00  .440000E+01
 46   .360000E-01  .102400E-02  .153400E-03  -.228000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
 47   .360000E-01  .102400E-02  .153400E-03  -.228000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
 48   .360000E-01  .102400E-02  .153400E-03  -.228000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
 49   .360000E-01  .102400E-02  .153400E-03  -.228000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
 50   .360000E-01  .102400E-02  .153400E-03  -.228000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
 51   .360000E-01  .102400E-02  .153400E-03  -.228000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
 52   .360000E-01  .102400E-02  .153400E-03  -.228000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
 53   .360000E-01  .102400E-02  .153400E-03  -.228000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
 54   .360000E-01  .102400E-02  .153400E-03  -.228000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
 55   .360000E-01  .102400E-02  .153400E-03  -.228000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
 56   .360000E-01  .102400E-02  .153400E-03  -.228000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
 57   .160000E-01  .107200E-02  .161200E-03  -.247000E-01  .100000E+01  .856000E+01
 58   .290000E-01  .104500E-02  .155100E-03  -.234000E-01  .950000E+00  .116000E+02
 59   .290000E-01  .104500E-02  .155100E-03  -.234000E-01  .950000E+00  .116000E+02
 60   .290000E-01  .104500E-02  .155100E-03  -.234000E-01  .950000E+00  .116000E+02
 61   .290000E-01  .104500E-02  .155100E-03  -.234000E-01  .950000E+00  .116000E+02
 62   .430000E-01  .104400E-02  .141100E-03  -.236000E-01  .950000E+00  .560000E+01
 63   .430000E-01  .105700E-02  .142000E-03  -.241000E-01  .950000E+00  .750000E+01
 64   .430000E-01  .104400E-02  .141100E-03  -.236000E-01  .950000E+00  .560000E+01
 65   .430000E-01  .104400E-02  .141100E-03  -.236000E-01  .950000E+00  .560000E+01
 66   .430000E-01  .104400E-02  .141100E-03  -.236000E-01  .950000E+00  .560000E+01
 67   .430000E-01  .104400E-02  .141100E-03  -.236000E-01  .950000E+00  .560000E+01
 68   .430000E-01  .104400E-02  .141100E-03  -.236000E-01  .950000E+00  .560000E+01
 69   .320000E-01  .105800E-02  .149400E-03  -.244000E-01  .950000E+00  .900000E+01
 70   .180000E-01  .111400E-02  .157200E-03  -.265000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
 71   .320000E-01  .105800E-02  .149400E-03  -.244000E-01  .950000E+00  .900000E+01
 72   .430000E-01  .103200E-02  .146900E-03  -.226000E-01  .950000E+00  .900000E+01
 75   .430000E-01  .103200E-02  .146900E-03  -.226000E-01  .950000E+00  .900000E+01


sta      bias        slope          pcor         tcor          wt           lag
---  ------------  ----------- ------------  ------------  -----------  -----------
 76   .110000E-01  .889100E-03  .165400E-03  -.284000E-01  .600000E+00  .100000E+02
 77   .110000E-01  .889100E-03  .165400E-03  -.284000E-01  .600000E+00  .100000E+02
 78   .110000E-01  .889100E-03  .165400E-03  -.284000E-01  .600000E+00  .100000E+02
 79   .200000E-01  .883500E-03  .159700E-03  -.286000E-01  .590000E+00  .917000E+01
 80   .400000E-02  .836400E-03  .212700E-03  -.247000E-01  .480000E+00  .920000E+01
 81   .200000E-01  .883500E-03  .159700E-03  -.286000E-01  .590000E+00  .917000E+01
 82   .200000E-01  .883500E-03  .159700E-03  -.286000E-01  .590000E+00  .917000E+01
 83   .200000E-01  .883500E-03  .159700E-03  -.286000E-01  .590000E+00  .917000E+01
 84   .200000E-01  .883500E-03  .159700E-03  -.286000E-01  .590000E+00  .917000E+01
 85   .200000E-01  .883500E-03  .159700E-03  -.286000E-01  .590000E+00  .917000E+01
 86   .207000E-01  .110900E-02  .149500E-03  -.267000E-01  .770000E+00  .105400E+02
 87   .209000E-01  .110900E-02  .149500E-03  -.267000E-01  .770000E+00  .105400E+02
 88   .211000E-01  .110900E-02  .149500E-03  -.267000E-01  .770000E+00  .105400E+02
 89   .213000E-01  .110900E-02  .149500E-03  -.267000E-01  .770000E+00  .105400E+02
 90   .215000E-01  .110900E-02  .149500E-03  -.267000E-01  .770000E+00  .105400E+02
 91   .217000E-01  .110900E-02  .149500E-03  -.267000E-01  .770000E+00  .105400E+02
 92   .219000E-01  .110900E-02  .149500E-03  -.267000E-01  .770000E+00  .105400E+02
 93   .242000E-01  .110200E-02  .148400E-03  -.272000E-01  .700000E+00  .100500E+02
 94   .236000E-01  .110200E-02  .148400E-03  -.272000E-01  .700000E+00  .100500E+02
 95   .229000E-01  .110200E-02  .148400E-03  -.272000E-01  .700000E+00  .100500E+02
 96   .223000E-01  .110200E-02  .148400E-03  -.272000E-01  .700000E+00  .100500E+02
 97   .216000E-01  .110200E-02  .148400E-03  -.272000E-01  .700000E+00  .100500E+02
 98   .326000E-01  .108300E-02  .142600E-03  -.271000E-01  .630000E+00  .490000E+01
 99   .328000E-01  .108300E-02  .142600E-03  -.271000E-01  .630000E+00  .490000E+01
100   .330000E-01  .108300E-02  .142600E-03  -.271000E-01  .630000E+00  .490000E+01
101   .333000E-01  .108300E-02  .142600E-03  -.271000E-01  .630000E+00  .490000E+01
102   .335000E-01  .108300E-02  .142600E-03  -.271000E-01  .630000E+00  .490000E+01
103   .338000E-01  .108300E-02  .142600E-03  -.271000E-01  .630000E+00  .490000E+01
104   .189000E-01  .111500E-02  .148600E-03  -.279000E-01  .700000E+00  .801000E+01
105   .193000E-01  .111500E-02  .148600E-03  -.279000E-01  .700000E+00  .801000E+01
106   .196000E-01  .111500E-02  .148600E-03  -.279000E-01  .700000E+00  .801000E+01
107   .243000E-01  .111200E-02  .145700E-03  -.274000E-01  .700000E+00  .800000E+01
108   .245000E-01  .111200E-02  .145700E-03  -.274000E-01  .700000E+00  .800000E+01
109   .248000E-01  .111200E-02  .145700E-03  -.274000E-01  .700000E+00  .800000E+01
110   .340000E-01  .107100E-02  .145200E-03  -.260000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
111   .340000E-01  .107100E-02  .145200E-03  -.260000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
113   .355000E-01  .108700E-02  .140200E-03  -.264000E-01  .700000E+00  .750000E+01
114   .357000E-01  .108700E-02  .140200E-03  -.264000E-01  .700000E+00  .750000E+01
115   .366000E-01  .108000E-02  .142100E-03  -.260000E-01  .700000E+00  .748000E+01

sta      bias        slope          pcor         tcor          wt           lag
---  ------------  ----------- ------------  ------------  -----------  -----------
116   .120000E-01  .113900E-02  .148600E-03  -.301000E-01  .700000E+00  .700000E+01
117   .362000E-01  .108000E-02  .142100E-03  -.260000E-01  .700000E+00  .748000E+01
118   .361000E-01  .108000E-02  .142100E-03  -.260000E-01  .700000E+00  .748000E+01
119   .359000E-01  .108000E-02  .142100E-03  -.260000E-01  .700000E+00  .748000E+01
120   .213000E-01  .111600E-02  .146500E-03  -.273000E-01  .680000E+00  .700000E+01
121   .212000E-01  .111600E-02  .146500E-03  -.273000E-01  .680000E+00  .700000E+01
122   .211000E-01  .111600E-02  .146500E-03  -.273000E-01  .680000E+00  .700000E+01
123   .211000E-01  .111600E-02  .146500E-03  -.273000E-01  .680000E+00  .700000E+01
124   .170000E-01  .111700E-02  .151000E-03  -.272000E-01  .640000E+00  .686000E+01
125   .700000E-02  .116700E-02  .150000E-03  -.288000E-01  .780000E+00  .800000E+01
126   .700000E-02  .116700E-02  .150000E-03  -.288000E-01  .780000E+00  .800000E+01
127   .940000E-02  .115400E-02  .150100E-03  -.287000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
128   .950000E-02  .115400E-02  .150100E-03  -.287000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
129   .970000E-02  .115400E-02  .150100E-03  -.287000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
130   .980000E-02  .115400E-02  .150100E-03  -.287000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
131   .830000E-02  .116100E-02  .149700E-03  -.288000E-01  .760000E+00  .800000E+01
132   .840000E-02  .116100E-02  .149700E-03  -.288000E-01  .760000E+00  .800000E+01
133   .850000E-02  .116100E-02  .149700E-03  -.288000E-01  .760000E+00  .800000E+01
134   .860000E-02  .116100E-02  .149700E-03  -.288000E-01  .760000E+00  .800000E+01
135   .880000E-02  .116100E-02  .149700E-03  -.288000E-01  .760000E+00  .800000E+01
136   .300000E-02  .118000E-02  .151800E-03  -.299000E-01  .640000E+00  .800000E+01
137   .280000E-02  .118900E-02  .148700E-03  -.299000E-01  .810000E+00  .868000E+01
138   .280000E-02  .118900E-02  .148700E-03  -.299000E-01  .810000E+00  .868000E+01
139   .280000E-02  .118900E-02  .148700E-03  -.299000E-01  .810000E+00  .868000E+01
140   .280000E-02  .118900E-02  .148700E-03  -.299000E-01  .810000E+00  .868000E+01
142   .290000E-02  .118900E-02  .148700E-03  -.299000E-01  .810000E+00  .868000E+01
143   .290000E-02  .118900E-02  .148700E-03  -.299000E-01  .810000E+00  .868000E+01
144   .290000E-02  .118900E-02  .148700E-03  -.299000E-01  .810000E+00  .868000E+01
145   .100000E-01  .117200E-02  .147000E-03  -.307000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
146   .100000E-01  .117200E-02  .147000E-03  -.307000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
147   .100000E-01  .117200E-02  .147000E-03  -.307000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
148   .100000E-01  .117200E-02  .147000E-03  -.307000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
149   .100000E-01  .117200E-02  .147000E-03  -.307000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
150   .100000E-01  .117200E-02  .147000E-03  -.307000E-01  .750000E+00  .800000E+01
151   .750000E-02  .118900E-02  .146900E-03  -.297000E-01  .790000E+00  .151500E+02
152   .760000E-02  .118900E-02  .146900E-03  -.297000E-01  .790000E+00  .151500E+02
153   .760000E-02  .118900E-02  .146900E-03  -.297000E-01  .790000E+00  .151500E+02
154   .770000E-02  .118900E-02  .146900E-03  -.297000E-01  .790000E+00  .151500E+02
155   .770000E-02  .118900E-02  .146900E-03  -.297000E-01  .790000E+00  .151500E+02


sta      bias        slope          pcor         tcor          wt           lag
---  ------------  ----------- ------------  ------------  -----------  -----------
156   .700000E-02  .119500E-02  .145800E-03  -.309000E-01  .720000E+00  .231500E+02
157   .400000E-02  .120700E-02  .146700E-03  -.305000E-01  .800000E+00  .153500E+02
158   .400000E-02  .120700E-02  .146700E-03  -.305000E-01  .800000E+00  .153500E+02
159   .400000E-02  .120700E-02  .146700E-03  -.305000E-01  .800000E+00  .153500E+02
160   .140000E-01  .118300E-02  .144500E-03  -.299000E-01  .810000E+00  .909000E+01
161   .140000E-01  .118300E-02  .144500E-03  -.299000E-01  .810000E+00  .909000E+01
162   .140000E-01  .118300E-02  .144500E-03  -.299000E-01  .810000E+00  .909000E+01
163  -.200000E-02  .122400E-02  .147100E-03  -.325000E-01  .700000E+00  .900000E+01
164   .155000E-01  .116100E-02  .145800E-03  -.290000E-01  .740000E+00  .468000E+01
165   .154000E-01  .116100E-02  .145800E-03  -.290000E-01  .740000E+00  .468000E+01
166   .153000E-01  .116100E-02  .145800E-03  -.290000E-01  .740000E+00  .468000E+01
167   .152000E-01  .116100E-02  .145800E-03  -.290000E-01  .740000E+00  .468000E+01
168   .570000E-02  .119400E-02  .146900E-03  -.303000E-01  .820000E+00  .300000E+01
169   .580000E-02  .119400E-02  .146900E-03  -.303000E-01  .820000E+00  .300000E+01
170   .580000E-02  .119400E-02  .146900E-03  -.303000E-01  .820000E+00  .300000E+01
171  -.910000E-02  .127000E-02  .145300E-03  -.393000E-01  .900000E+00  .300000E+01
172  -.920000E-02  .127000E-02  .145300E-03  -.393000E-01  .900000E+00  .300000E+01
173  -.920000E-02  .127000E-02  .145300E-03  -.393000E-01  .900000E+00  .300000E+01
174  -.930000E-02  .127000E-02  .145300E-03  -.393000E-01  .900000E+00  .300000E+01
175   .160000E-01  .117500E-02  .144700E-03  -.296000E-01  .900000E+00  .300000E+01
176   .160000E-01  .117500E-02  .144700E-03  -.296000E-01  .900000E+00  .300000E+01
177   .160000E-01  .117500E-02  .144700E-03  -.296000E-01  .900000E+00  .300000E+01
178   .160000E-01  .117500E-02  .144700E-03  -.296000E-01  .900000E+00  .300000E+01
179   .258000E-01  .108500E-02  .154600E-03  -.244000E-01  .840000E+00  .300000E+01
180   .259000E-01  .108500E-02  .154600E-03  -.244000E-01  .840000E+00  .300000E+01
181   .260000E-01  .108500E-02  .154600E-03  -.244000E-01  .840000E+00  .300000E+01
182   .260000E-01  .108500E-02  .154600E-03  -.244000E-01  .840000E+00  .300000E+01
183   .400000E-01  .108300E-02  .134600E-03  -.249000E-01  .950000E+00  .800000E+01
184   .400000E-01  .108300E-02  .134600E-03  -.249000E-01  .950000E+00  .800000E+01
185   .150000E-01  .113600E-02  .148000E-03  -.269000E-01  .870000E+00  .800000E+01
186   .145000E-01  .113600E-02  .148000E-03  -.269000E-01  .870000E+00  .800000E+01
188   .135000E-01  .113600E-02  .148000E-03  -.269000E-01  .870000E+00  .800000E+01
190   .486000E-01  .107100E-02  .129000E-03  -.261000E-01  .720000E+00  .120000E+01
191   .489000E-01  .107100E-02  .129000E-03  -.261000E-01  .720000E+00  .120000E+01
192   .492000E-01  .107100E-02  .129000E-03  -.261000E-01  .720000E+00  .120000E+01
193   .495000E-01  .107100E-02  .129000E-03  -.261000E-01  .720000E+00  .120000E+01
194   .498000E-01  .107100E-02  .129000E-03  -.261000E-01  .720000E+00  .120000E+01
195   .370000E-01  .110000E-02  .134700E-03  -.273000E-01  .750000E+00  .510000E+01
196   .372000E-01  .110000E-02  .134700E-03  -.273000E-01  .750000E+00  .510000E+01

sta      bias        slope          pcor         tcor          wt           lag
---  ------------  ----------- ------------  ------------  -----------  -----------
197   .374000E-01  .110000E-02  .134700E-03  -.273000E-01  .750000E+00  .510000E+01
198   .376000E-01  .110000E-02  .134700E-03  -.273000E-01  .750000E+00  .510000E+01
199   .377000E-01  .110000E-02  .134700E-03  -.273000E-01  .750000E+00  .510000E+01
200   .379000E-01  .110000E-02  .134700E-03  -.273000E-01  .750000E+00  .510000E+01
201   .381000E-01  .110000E-02  .134700E-03  -.273000E-01  .750000E+00  .510000E+01
202   .531000E-01  .106300E-02  .130700E-03  -.253000E-01  .730000E+00  .510000E+01
203   .532000E-01  .106300E-02  .130700E-03  -.253000E-01  .730000E+00  .510000E+01
204   .533000E-01  .106300E-02  .130700E-03  -.253000E-01  .730000E+00  .510000E+01
205   .535000E-01  .106300E-02  .130700E-03  -.253000E-01  .730000E+00  .510000E+01
206   .536000E-01  .106300E-02  .130700E-03  -.253000E-01  .730000E+00  .510000E+01
207   .537000E-01  .106300E-02  .130700E-03  -.253000E-01  .730000E+00  .510000E+01
208   .539000E-01  .106300E-02  .130700E-03  -.253000E-01  .730000E+00  .510000E+01
209   .540000E-01  .106300E-02  .130700E-03  -.253000E-01  .730000E+00  .510000E+01
210   .541000E-01  .106300E-02  .130700E-03  -.253000E-01  .730000E+00  .510000E+01
211   .543000E-01  .106300E-02  .130700E-03  -.253000E-01  .730000E+00  .510000E+01
212   .406000E-01  .107600E-02  .138800E-03  -.256000E-01  .740000E+00  .859000E+01
213   .407000E-01  .107600E-02  .138800E-03  -.256000E-01  .740000E+00  .859000E+01
214   .409000E-01  .107600E-02  .138800E-03  -.256000E-01  .740000E+00  .859000E+01
215   .410000E-01  .107600E-02  .138800E-03  -.256000E-01  .740000E+00  .859000E+01
216   .412000E-01  .107600E-02  .138800E-03  -.256000E-01  .740000E+00  .859000E+01
217   .413000E-01  .107600E-02  .138800E-03  -.256000E-01  .740000E+00  .859000E+01
218   .414000E-01  .107600E-02  .138800E-03  -.256000E-01  .740000E+00  .859000E+01
219   .416000E-01  .107600E-02  .138800E-03  -.256000E-01  .740000E+00  .859000E+01
220   .417000E-01  .107600E-02  .138800E-03  -.256000E-01  .740000E+00  .859000E+01
221   .418000E-01  .107600E-02  .138800E-03  -.256000E-01  .740000E+00  .859000E+01
222   .290000E-01  .106900E-02  .157900E-03  -.249000E-01  .820000E+00  .918000E+01
223   .290000E-01  .106900E-02  .157900E-03  -.249000E-01  .820000E+00  .918000E+01
224   .291000E-01  .106900E-02  .157900E-03  -.249000E-01  .820000E+00  .918000E+01
225   .291000E-01  .106900E-02  .157900E-03  -.249000E-01  .820000E+00  .918000E+01
226   .291000E-01  .106900E-02  .157900E-03  -.249000E-01  .820000E+00  .918000E+01
227   .291000E-01  .106900E-02  .157900E-03  -.249000E-01  .820000E+00  .918000E+01
228   .291000E-01  .106900E-02  .157900E-03  -.249000E-01  .820000E+00  .918000E+01
229   .292000E-01  .106900E-02  .157900E-03  -.249000E-01  .820000E+00  .918000E+01
230   .292000E-01  .106900E-02  .157900E-03  -.249000E-01  .820000E+00  .918000E+01
231   .292000E-01  .106900E-02  .157900E-03  -.249000E-01  .820000E+00  .918000E+01
232   .127000E-01  .114900E-02  .149000E-03  -.284000E-01  .900000E+00  .100000E+02
233   .128000E-01  .114900E-02  .149000E-03  -.284000E-01  .900000E+00  .100000E+02
234   .128000E-01  .114900E-02  .149000E-03  -.284000E-01  .900000E+00  .100000E+02
235   .129000E-01  .114900E-02  .149000E-03  -.284000E-01  .900000E+00  .100000E+02


sta      bias        slope          pcor         tcor          wt           lag
---  ------------  ----------- ------------  ------------  -----------  -----------
236   .130000E-01  .114900E-02  .149000E-03  -.284000E-01  .900000E+00  .100000E+02
237   .131000E-01  .114900E-02  .149000E-03  -.284000E-01  .900000E+00  .100000E+02
238   .131000E-01  .114900E-02  .149000E-03  -.284000E-01  .900000E+00  .100000E+02
239   .132000E-01  .114900E-02  .149000E-03  -.284000E-01  .900000E+00  .100000E+02
240   .133000E-01  .114900E-02  .149000E-03  -.284000E-01  .900000E+00  .100000E+02
241   .264000E-01  .107100E-02  .163600E-03  -.250000E-01  .850000E+00  .317000E+01
242   .264000E-01  .107100E-02  .163600E-03  -.250000E-01  .850000E+00  .317000E+01
243   .265000E-01  .107100E-02  .163600E-03  -.250000E-01  .850000E+00  .317000E+01
244   .265000E-01  .107100E-02  .163600E-03  -.250000E-01  .850000E+00  .317000E+01
245   .266000E-01  .107100E-02  .163600E-03  -.250000E-01  .850000E+00  .317000E+01
246   .266000E-01  .107100E-02  .163600E-03  -.250000E-01  .850000E+00  .317000E+01
248   .349000E-01  .843000E-03  .155600E-03  -.288000E-01  .500000E+00  .690000E+01
249   .349000E-01  .843000E-03  .155600E-03  -.288000E-01  .500000E+00  .690000E+01
250   .350000E-01  .843000E-03  .155600E-03  -.288000E-01  .500000E+00  .690000E+01
251   .351000E-01  .843000E-03  .155600E-03  -.288000E-01  .500000E+00  .690000E+01
252   .352000E-01  .843000E-03  .155600E-03  -.288000E-01  .500000E+00  .690000E+01
253   .353000E-01  .843000E-03  .155600E-03  -.288000E-01  .500000E+00  .690000E+01
254   .354000E-01  .843000E-03  .155600E-03  -.288000E-01  .500000E+00  .690000E+01
255   .355000E-01  .843000E-03  .155600E-03  -.288000E-01  .500000E+00  .690000E+01
256   .355000E-01  .843000E-03  .155600E-03  -.288000E-01  .500000E+00  .690000E+01
257   .355000E-01  .843000E-03  .155600E-03  -.288000E-01  .500000E+00  .690000E+01
258   .220000E-01  .874600E-03  .161500E-03  -.293000E-01  .550000E+00  .106700E+02
259   .221000E-01  .874600E-03  .161500E-03  -.293000E-01  .550000E+00  .106700E+02
260   .221000E-01  .874600E-03  .161500E-03  -.293000E-01  .550000E+00  .106700E+02
261   .222000E-01  .874600E-03  .161500E-03  -.293000E-01  .550000E+00  .106700E+02
262   .223000E-01  .874600E-03  .161500E-03  -.293000E-01  .550000E+00  .106700E+02
263   .223000E-01  .874600E-03  .161500E-03  -.293000E-01  .550000E+00  .106700E+02
264   .224000E-01  .874600E-03  .161500E-03  -.293000E-01  .550000E+00  .106700E+02
265   .224000E-01  .874600E-03  .161500E-03  -.293000E-01  .550000E+00  .106700E+02
266   .224000E-01  .874600E-03  .161500E-03  -.293000E-01  .550000E+00  .106700E+02
267   .224000E-01  .874600E-03  .161500E-03  -.293000E-01  .550000E+00  .106700E+02


      
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
      

APPENDIX H: CTD PROCESSING: STATION BY STATION 
            (notes on fitting, interpolations, spikes, etc.)

Station   
No.       Comments
-------   ------------------------------------------------------------------
1         Test station

2         Test station

3         Test station

4         Surface spike in salinity. 1,3 dbar salts marked bad.
          Refit station 4's oxygen data by itself. Formerly stations 4
          and 5 fit together.

5         Surface spike in salinity. 1 dbar salt marked questionable.

6         Oxygen too high, adjusted by -.04ml/l in CTD and SEA file.

7         Deep water spike in salinity. Interpolate salinity 1233 to 1251db.

8         Spike in salinity. Interpolate salinity 171 to 185.
          Spike in salinity. Interpolate salinity 1825 to 1843.
          Spike in oxygen. Interpolate oxygen 1819 to 1847.

9         Jump in oxygen, -.04 from 1.55 to 1.65 deg.theta. Could be
          real, quality word left at 2.

10        Surface spike in salinity. 1,3 dbar salt marked bad.

11

12        Initially missing top 400 meters of data due to beginning bad
          records in raw data being interpreted as beginning pressure by
          the pressure averaging program.
          Top 400 meters recovered.
          Spike in salinity. Interpolate 381db salt.
          CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 57 dbar as
          questionable. 

13

14        Surface spike in salinity. 1 dbar salt marked bad.

15        CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 79 dbs as
          questionable. 
          CTD oxygen might be off around 5 degrees theta, unclear from
          bottles, CTD quality word left as good.

16        CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 57 dbar as
          questionable. 

17

18        Deep water spike in salinity due to incorrect data at end
          of file. The pressure averaging program interpolates all the
          2db bins between last good point and first bad point adding
          ~200 dbar of bad information which goes below the ocean floor.
          The bad data at the bottom of the file were removed.  
          CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 81db as
          questionable. 

19

20        Spike in salinity. Interpolate salt 223 to 231db.
          CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 73 dbar as
          questionable. 

21

22         

23        Wayward salinity. Interpolate salt 67 to 73 db.
          CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 77 dbar as
          questionable. 

24        Wayward salinity. Interpolate salt 63 to 71 db.
          CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 71 dbar as
          questionable. 

25        Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 dbar salts as bad.

26        CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 73 dbar as
          questionable. 
          Tried to refit CTD to match deep bottles better. No better fit
          found so fit left as it was.

27        CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 93 dbar as
          questionable. 

29        Deep water spike in salinity. Interpolate salt 1637 to 1761 dbar.

31        Deep water spike in salinity. Interpolate salt 2041 to 2059db.
          Deep water spike in oxygen. Interpolate oxygen 2045 to 2053 db.

32        Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 dbar salts as bad.
          CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 83 dbar as
          questionable. 

33        CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 67 dbar as
          questionable. 

34        CTD oxygen lower than bottles  at 2.6 deg.theta. Doesn't look
          quite right but quality word left as good.

36        CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 75 dbar as
          questionable. 

37        CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 65 dbar as
          questionable. 

39        CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 73 dbar as
          questionable. 

40        CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 101 dbar as
          questionable. 

41        CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 73 dbar as
          questionable. 

42        Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1db salts as bad. 
          Theta salinity plot shows looping. Changing water (fresher than
          41 and 43) may add to variability?

44        CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 65 dbar as
          questionable. 

46        CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 87 dbar as
          questionable. 

47        CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 189 dbar as
          questionable. 

49        CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 87 dbar as
          questionable. 

50        CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 123 dbar as
          questionable. 

51        CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 79 dbar as
          questionable. 

52        CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 52 dbar as
          questionable. 

53        CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 113 dbar as
          questionable.
          Mark oxygens in deeper region for same reason, 555 to 799db.

54        Deep water spike in salinity. Interpolate salt 3177 to 3183db.
          CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 85 dbar as
          questionable.

56        CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 95 dbar as
          questionable.

57        Station 57 oxygen data refit by itself. Formerly fit with
          stations 46 to 57.

58        CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 159 dbar as
          questionable.

59        Small surface spike in salinity called ok- spike has changed
          theta which makes it much more likely to be real.          
          CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 231 dbar as
          questionable.

60        CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 131 dbar as
          questionable.

61        CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 161 dbar as
          questionable and 423 to 775 as questionable.

62        Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1-5db salts as bad.

63        Spike in salinity. Interpolate salt 535 to 581db.
          Gap in data. Interpolate temperature, and salinity  535
          to 581 dbar. Interpolate oxygen 531 to 589
          CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 213 dbar as
          questionable.
          Stations 62, 64 and particularly 63 show more noise at depth 
          than other stations in the oxygen profile.  Could be due to 
          non uniform lowering rate associated with poor sea state.

64        CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 251 dbar as
          questionable.

69        Spike in oxygen. Interpolate oxygen 81 to 105db.

70 to 72  Oxygen is noisier than usual, especially station 72. Salinity
          profile also has more looping in it.  Both salinity and oxygen
          showing noise and loops supports the thought that the noise 
          is caused by nonuniform lowering rate due to bad weather or big
          seas. The lowering rate varies from .5m/s to 2m/s unlike
          station 69 where the lowering rate was fairly consistent at 1m/s.

71        CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 151 dbar as
          questionable.

72        Seeing loops in theta salinity plots.


LEG 4

75        Looks like it is on its own in theta salinity plot but it is
          consistent with station 71 which is moving between station 72 
          and 75.

76 to 78 refit. The bottom oxygens were not matching the bottles. The 
          original fit was from a larger group 76 to 85. 

78        Oxygen does not reach oxygen minimum defined by bottles at
          3 degrees theta.

79        Large gap in data. Winch died near 1880 dbar. CTD stopped
          logging at this depth and was not started again until 2100db.
          Fix: Linear interpolation of temperature from 1879 to 2109 db.
          Salt and oxygen information copied from station 78 at matching
          theta intervals. Salt replaced from 1831 to 2401 dbar. Oxygen
          replaced from 1831 to the bottom.
          Oxygen does not reach oxygen minimum defined by bottles at 3
          deg.

80        Oxygen lower than bottles at 7 deg. theta. Quality word not
          adjusted. 

81        Bottom spike in oxygen spanning 3127 to 3393 dbar.
          This corresponds to the change in the rate of decent as the CTD
          approaches the bottom. This was checked and found true for 
          84 through 87 as well.

93 to 97:
          Variability in oxygen profile increase. Due to sea state?

101 and 102:
          CTD oxygen appears high from 8 to 14 deg.theta by .1 ml/l in both
          stations 101 and 102

111       Refit oxygen in station 111 by itself. Formerly in group of
          stations 111,113, 114

118 and 119:
          CTD oxygen in 118 and 119 is marginal between good and
          questionable , low from 3 to 8deg.theta. Quality word left as good.

119       Bottom oxygen drifts high from bottom five bottles. Marked 
          oxygens as questionable throughout the drift, 4661 to 5620 db.

124       Refit oxygen be itself. Formerly fit in group 120 through 124.

128       Abrupt change into new water.

130       Deep water spike in salinity. Interpolate salt 4285 to 4301 dbar
          Deep oxygen has looping, jagged, noisier than the other
          stations. 

131       Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 dbar salts as bad.

132       Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 dbar salts as questionable.

135       Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 dbar salts as questionable.         

136       Acquisition computers crashed 700 m off the bottom.  Acquisition
          halted and resumed. When resumed, oxygen had changed to a lower
          oxygen by .04 ml/l. Marked oxygen quality word as bad from 4905
          db, where the jump occurred to the bottom.

137 to 142 bottle oxygens appear low, CTD oxygens are consistent with
          earlier stations.

137       Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 dbar salts as questionable.
          Station +.002 psu than other stations. Salt slope reduced in
          calibrations files.

139       Spike in salinity at bottom of cast. Mark last data point as bad.

143       Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 dbar salts as bad.
          Big surface spike in oxygen. Mark 1 dbar oxygen and temperature 
          bad.

145 to 150:
          Refit oxygens in this group to get bottom oxygens to match
          bottles. Bottom oxygens now match better although top , near
          sea surface looks a little worse. 

147       Data has gap where there were no observations 2259 to 2313db.
          Salinity spikes. Interpolate salt 1903,1909,1911,1931,1991, 
          2067-2085, 2093-2097, 2013-2027, 2157-2171, 2181-2189, 
          2257-2321db.
          Oxygen spikes. Interpolate oxygen 2073 to 2133 and 2257 to 
          2321db.
          Temperature was also interpolated over this range.

148       Bottom oxygen spike. Mark oxygen as questionable 6400db to
          bottom. 

151       Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 dbar salts as bad.

156 to 167:
          show two systematic spikes (small, around
          .002 psu) occuring near 2300db and 4400db.
          Interpolate over salt spike 5511 to 5545db.

156       Gap in data. Interpolate over gap for temperature, salt and
          oxygen from 5513 to 5547db.
          Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 dbar salts as bad.
          Surface spike in oxygen. Mark 1 dbar bad.

157       Interpolate over salt spike 4409 to 4411db.

158       Gap in data. Interpolate over gap for temperature, salt and
          oxygen from 5521 to 5559db.
          Interpolate over additional salt spike 4415 to 4449db.

159       Interpolate over salt spike 2333 to 2353db.
          Interpolate over oxygen spike 5525 to 5545.

160 to 162:
          Refit oxygen because bottom of profile was too high (.04ml/l). 

160       Interpolate over salt spike 4415 to 4433db.

161       Interpolate over salt spikes 2307 to 2323 and 4359 to 4361db.

162       Interpolate over salt spike 2357 to 2365db.

163       Interpolate over salt spikes 2363 to 2375 and 4327 to 4339db.

164       Gap in data, 4565 to 4603 dbar. Interpolate temperature, salt and
          oxygen.
          Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1 dbar salts as questionable.

165       Gap in data, 5593 to 5649 dbar. Interpolate temperatre, salt and
          oxygen. 

166       Gap in data, 5617 to 5645 dbar. Interpolate temperature, salt and
          oxygen. 
          Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1 dbar salts as bad.

167       Interpolate over salt spike 5613 to 5631db.
          Interpolate over oxygen spike 5611 to 5631 db.

171 to 174
          CTD oxygen does not looked scaled correctly. CTD is .4 ml/l low
          from 8 deg. theta to surface. Close look at CTD below 2deg.
          theta looks fine. Bottle data used for fitting had not been
          corrected for bottles out of order. This may have caused a
          problem if bottles were subsequently reordered.

171       Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 dbar salts as bad.
          Interpolate over salt spike at 2501db.

173       Spike in salinity. Interpolate 103 db.

174       Interpolate over salt spike 6537 to 6549db.


LEG 5

181       Bottom oxygen is high.

182 to 188 CTD is uniform but water sample salt high,.001psu, in deep water

185       Spike in salinity. Mark 1,3,5 dbar salts as bad.

195       Small spike in salinity with looping in theta v salt plot. 
          Interpolate 405 to 461db.

197       Oxygen data noisier than usual.

198       Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 dbar salts as bad. 
          Small spike in salt, interpolate 849 db.
          Nice crossover from one water mass to the next through stations
          197 to 199.

199       Bottom bottle is deeper than CTD downtrace by 7 dbar.

200       Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 dbar salts as bad. Small spike, 
          interpolate salt at 1063 db.

201       Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 dbar salts as bad. 
          Spikes/ density inversion, interpolate 453db and 457db.
          Salinity spike at bottom. Mark last salt record, 2275db., as bad.

202       Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1 dbar salt as questionable. Spikes /
          density inversions, interpolate 453db and 459db.

207       Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1 dbar salt as bad. 

209       Small spike in salinity, interpolate 375db.

210       Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 dbar salts as questionable. 

211       Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 dbar salts as bad. 

213       Spike in salinity. Interpolate salts 553 to 561db.

215       Surface spike in salinity. Supported by water sample, accepted 
          as good.          
          Bottom spike in salinity. Mark last salt record, 3423 dbar. as bad.

219       Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 dbar salts as questionable.

222       Salinity jumps low, stays low, then jumps back to where it was.
          Due to temporary contamination of the cell? Interpolate salts over
          jump from 547 to 567 dbar.

223       Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1 dbar salt as bad. 

224       Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 dbar salts as bad. 

226       Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1db salt as questionable. 

227       Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1 dbar salt as questionable. 
          CTD oxygen low compared to bottles from 18 deg. theta to
          surface. Quality word left as good.

232       Oxygen is a little high at bottom,.04 

235       Odd structure in salt 14 to 16 deg theta. Left as is.
          Interpolate salinity spike 1087 to 1095db.

236       Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1 dbar salt as bad. Interpolate
          over salinity spike 1537 to 1553 db.
          CTD oxygen low compared to bottles by .04 ml/l. Quality word
          left as good.

240       Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1db salt as questionable.
          Interpolate over salinity spike at 23db.

242       Small salinity spike, interpolate salt from 383 to 401.

245       Very warm water at surface.
          Oxygen too low, a bias of .1 ml/l added to profile.

248       Station salt is+.002 psu than other stations. Salt slope 
          reduced in calibrations files.
          Interpolate oxygens over 1741 to 1757

253       Interpolate over salinity spike 649 to 659 db.

256       Oxygen too high, a bias of .1ml/l subtracted from profile.




LIST OF INTERPOLATIONS MADE TO CTD DATA. 

Any 2 dbar bin in the CTD file that had no observations automatically was 
assigned a "6" in all quality fields. Those bins with no observations have not 
been included in this list. 

     St. Bad   Interpolated  End Bad
STA  Pressure    Parameter   Pressure
-------------------------------------
  7,  1233,        3,         1251
  8,   171,        3,          185
  8,  1825,        3,         1843
  8,  1819,        4,         1847
 20,   223,        3,          231
 23,    67,        3,           73
 24,    63,        3,           71
 29,  1637,        3,         1761
 31,  2041,        3,         2059
 31,  2045,        4,         2053
 54,  3177,        3,         3183
 63,   435,        2,          581
 63,   535,        3,          581
 63,   531,        4,          589
 69,    81,        4,          105
 95,   283,        3,          283
103,     9,        3,            9
105,  1057,        3,         1057
130,  4285,        3,         4301
147,  2259,        2,         2313
147,  1903,        3,         1903
147,  1909,        3,         1909
147,  1911,        3,         1911
147,  1991,        3,         1991
147,  2013,        3,         2027
147,  2067,        3,         2085
147,  2093,        3,         2097
147,  2157,        3,         2171
147,  2181,        3,         2189
147,  2257,        3,         2321
147,  2073,        4,         2133
147,  2255,        4,         2321
156,  5513,        2,         5547
156,  5511,        3,         5545
156,  5511,        4,         5547
157,  4409,        3,         4411
158,  5521,        2,         5559
158,  4415,        3,         4449
158,  5519,        3,         5559
158,  5521,        4,         5559
159,  2333,        3,         2253
159,  5525,        4,         5545
160,  4415,        3,         4433
161,  2307,        3,         2323
161,  4359,        3,         4361
162,  2357,        3,         2365
163,  2363,        3,         2375
163,  4327,        3,         4339
164,  4565,        2,         4603
164,  4563,        3,         4599
164,  4559,        4,         4601
165,  5595,        2,         5649
165,  5593,        3,         5649
165,  5591,        4,         5649
166,  5619,        2,         5645
166,  5619,        3,         5645
166,  5617,        4,         5645
167,  5613,        3,         5631
167,  5611,        4,         5631
171,  2501,        3,         2501
173,   103,        3,          103
174,  6537,        3,         6549
195,   405,        3,          461
198,   849,        3,          849
200,  1063,        3,         1063
201,   453,        3,          453
201,   457,        3,          457
202,   453,        3,          453
202,   459,        3,          459
209,   375,        3,          375
213,   553,        3,          561
222,   547,        3,          567
235,  1087,        3,         1095
236,  1537,        3,         1553
240,    23,        3,           23
242,   383,        3,          401
248,  1741,        4,         1757
248,  2217,        4,         2235
253,   649,        3,          659


      
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
      

REPORT OF CTD/WATERSAMPLE DATA SUBMISSION

GENERAL INFORMATION AND CTD OBSERVATION LOG

The following was excerpted from the at-sea log kept by
the CTD data processor on each leg (Carol MacMurray: legs
1,2; Ellyn Montgomery: leg 3).  The log details the major
difficulties experienced on P06.  In general, operations on
stations not discussed below went more-or-less normally.


        CTD instrument and station numbers:

                           CTD 10  Stations LEG 3: 1,4-72
                                            LEG 4: 74,75,86-111,113-140
                                                   142-186,188
                                            LEG 5: 190-212      

                           CTD 9   Stations LEG 3: 3
                                            LEG 4: 76-85,112,141,187
                                            LEG 5: 189
                             
                           CTD 7   Stations LEG 3: 2
                                            LEG 4: 73              
                                            LEG 5:

CTD 10 was the primary instrument on the cruise, #9 was called into service for 
some 10 stations during leg 3 when #10 failed.  CTD #9also failed on that leg, 
but by that time CTD #10 had been repaired.

CTDs 9 and 10 were equipped with a second temperature channel(using an FSI Ocean 
Temperature Module).  Data from these sensors were used to assess when during 
the cruise shifts in the primary temperature sensor occurred.  CTD #10 was also 
equipped with a pump, designed to make uniform the flow of seawater past the 
dissolved oxygen sensor.  The oxygen pump was used throughout leg 3.  Careful 
examination of the Leg 3 data after the cruise suggested the pump did not 
function as well as was hoped (or tested on earlier expeditions).  The oxygen 
current data are quite noisy in the top several hundred meters from Leg 
3.(Possibly the pump was cavatating on air not bled from the supply tube.)In any 
event, the final P06 data from Leg 3 have quite noisy oxygens in the upper ocean.  
Users may wish to do some vertical averaging/filtering prior to using these 
data.  The oxygen pump was removed from the system at the start of Leg 4 and not 
used for the rest of the expedition.


    Shorebased processor:  

    MicroVAX Data subdirectory: R2D2:<CTD.KN138P003

    NOTE:  The ship departed Valparaiso as Knorr 138 LEG 3.
           We will keep the directory KN138 throughout all three 
           legs and increment the station numbers.

    NOTE:  There was an FSI CTD and scripps logger attached to the 
           package for selected stations on Leg 5 to obtain comparison
           data to test this new instrument. 



************************************************************************
*                                                                      *
*                     A C Q U I S I T I O N                            *
*                                                                      *
************************************************************************


-----------------------
AT SEA DATA ACQUISITION
-----------------------

MICROVAX II
     CTD03
     with WHOI AQUI89 acquisition package (Version 1.0+)
 

Logging data to:   Vhs vcr tape recorder
                   9T 
                   Microvax disk file (###A###.RAW) in CTD78 format
                                      (*.WRW,*.WSC,*.HED,*.ERR) in ASCII format


CTD 10
    
  AT SEA COMMON USED FOR DATA ACQUISITION   CTD#10   
     These are the laboratory derived calibration constants used in the
      real-time display of data during the cruise

 v#  attribute 1     attribute 2      slope          bias           sens lag
 --  -------------   ------------   ------------  -------------   ------------
  1  -0.294565E-08   0.000000E+00   0.100352E+00  -0.246449E+00   0.000000E+00
  2   0.225955E-11   0.000000E+00   0.499864E-03   0.186416E-02   0.250000E+00
  3  -0.650000E-05   0.150000E-07   0.100631E-02  -0.177214E-02   0.000000E+00
  4   0.280000E+01   0.300000E+04   0.100000E+01   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00
  5  -0.360000E-01   0.115000E-03   0.123300E-02   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00
  6   0.750000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.128000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00
  7  -0.707350E+02   0.246810E+01  -0.909828E-02   0.362914E+02   0.000000E+00
  8   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.100000E+01   0.000000E+01   0.000000E+00
  9   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.500000E-03  -0.200000E+01   0.000000E+00
 10   0.543326E-01  -0.413000E-05   0.100000E+01   0.218000E+02   0.000000E+00

      TP cals changed sta 60:  S1=+2.71E-6  S2=-.054 
      Pres Bias set to -0.8 sta 60.

CTD 9
AT SEA COMMON USED FOR DATA ACQUISITION   CTD#9   

 v#   attribute 1    attribute 2      slope          bias           sens lag
 --  -------------   ------------   ------------  -------------   ------------
  1   0.297377E-09   0.000000E+00   0.100557E+00   0.450652E+00   0.000000E+00
  2   0.197920E-11   0.000000E+00   0.500248E-03  -0.361583E-01   0.250000E+00
  3  -0.650000E-05   0.150000E-07   0.997986E-03  -0.231510E-01   0.000000E+00
  4   0.280000E+01   0.300000E+04   0.100000E+01   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00
  5  -0.360000E-01   0.115000E-03   0.148000E-02   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00
  6   0.750000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.128000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00
  7  -0.227549E+03   0.126625E+02  -0.904813E-02   0.379786E+02   0.000000E+00
  8   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.100000E+01   0.000000E+01   0.000000E+00
  9   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.500000E-03  -0.200000E+01   0.000000E+00
 10  -0.141909E-01  -0.353000E-05   0.100000E+01   0.218000E+02   0.000000E+00

      TP cals changed leg 4:  S1=+3.39E-6  S2=+.015 
         

CTD 7
AT SEA COMMON USED FOR DATA ACQUISITION   CTD#7   

 v#   attribute 1    attribute 2      slope          bias           sens lag
 --  -------------   ------------   ------------  -------------   ------------
  1  -0.802577E-09   0.000000E+00   0.999165E-01   0.366930E+00   0.000000E+00
  2   0.131918E-11   0.000000E+00   0.499886E-03   0.627969E-03   0.250000E+00
  3  -0.650000E-05   0.150000E-07   0.984760E-03   0.380964E-01   0.000000E+00
  4   0.280000E+01   0.300000E+04   0.100000E+01   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00
  5  -0.360000E-01   0.115000E-03   0.240500E-02   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00
  6   0.750000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.128000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00
  7   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.100000E+01   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00
  8   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.100000E+01   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00
  9   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.500000E-03  -0.200000E+01   0.000000E+00
 10   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00   0.100000E+01   0.000000E+00   0.000000E+00
 
      TP cals changed leg 4:  S1=-2.54E-6  S2=-.40 



************************************************************************
*                                                                       *
*               S H I P B O A R D   P R O C E S S I N G                 *
*                                                                       *
************************************************************************



DESCRIPTION OF COMPUTER SYSTEM USED:


     CTDED78  
          
            run on MicroVAX Acquisition CTD78 format raw data 9T files.
            output to MicroVAX disk files [CTD.KN138P003.CTDED78]####D###.EDT

            error identification downtrace
           
         ***discovered bug in editor at sea:  given true pressure limits,
            program will truncate CTD data by 7-13 db depending on the depth.
            Deeper the station, more severe the truncation.  Noticed in
            Chilean trench.  Workaround:  add 20 dbars to max pressure limit
            observed by CTD (on station log).  Record limits do not seem
            to override this discrepancy. 

         ***discovered similar flakyness on leg 5.  Sometimes the record min
            for processing is ignored, when processing from disk files.  Using
            the AQUI 9tracks allowed correct processing in these cases.

    Water sample Programs:  BTLFMTVX, WOCTMPV2*  (to produce WOCE template)
                            BTLMRGV2, SEAMERG2   (to merge sa,ox,nuts data)
                            CONVERT,  HYDOUTV    (to create .dyn file)

                            *woctmpv2 was revised at sea to incorporate 
                             new PRESSC. for code

    Water sample corrections:   [ctd.kn138p003.john]fixtp.com
             modifies .wrw files to include a compensation
               for tp.

    Water sample filenames:   Salinity and Oxygen Rosette Samples 
                              for overplotting ctd and bottle data

       KN138.WSD - all stations
       KN138.DYN - all stations for overplotting
   
    Merged CTD, SA, OX, Nutrient water sample filename:

       KN138.SEA - WOCE template, all stations appended together




COMMENTS regarding data acquisition:

LEG 3:  Aqui89 troubles from the start of leg 3.  Code got corrupted and
        was scrambling the last three parameters (TP,TR,RT).  Plotting
        of extra variables and derived parameters was demonic.  Test sta
        999 and 998, and sta 1 were acquired with this corrupt code.
        A backup AQUI89 tape from July 1991 was restored to the microvax and
        sta 2 was acquired with this code.  Data clean.  Plotting 
        spikes for TE variable. Station 1 was replayed from audio tape with 
        this old code.

        Logging in parallel to PC, stations 999,998,1-3,5-7,9-12.
        Logging to third microvax rental, stations 11-17.

        Test sta 999 supplied too much power to fish, noise at bottom when
        firing.  Switched to battery, powered off lambda.  Pressure spikes
        apparent test sta 998.  Believed to be from pinger.  Sta 1 and 2
        were deployed with no pinger to test this hypothesis.  Verified.
        Pinger moved on rosette frame prior to sta 3, no spikes.

        Triple cast in Chilean trench.  Sta 1-ctd #10, sta 2-ctd #7, 
        sta 3-ctd #9.  Decided to go with ctd 10.  Ctd 7 bad oxy sensor,
        cond noisy deep water.  Ctd 9 equally as good as 10 but consensus
        was to use 10 because of oxy pump.  Ctd 10 showed some cond
        hysteresis at theta of 2.3-2.8 deg on co vs. te plots but t/s
        showed no up/down differences.  Bob said diff in co attributed
        to diff in pressure.  Up/down different by 30 db. 

        Replaced Oxygen sensor on ctd10 prior to sta 4.

        Power outages and total blackout prior to sta 8.  CTD02 and CTD03
        both crashed.  Early on, CTD03 had repeated crashes, at start of
        cruise and in port in Jacksonville.  Thought to be UPS, power or
        Ethernet related, one user logged off "mike" ship's Ethernet at 
        the same time during one crash.  Cause indeterminate.
         
        Noticed aqui record tags off by 50 dbars from deck unit readout
        on station logs.  Changed average number of scans in template file
        from 5 to 1 sta 9 to no avail.  Aqui tags were always higher than 
        deck unit readouts, indicating that the system was somewhat slow, 
        lagging behind the current scan.  Quick fix:  tagged 1 min after 
        firing.  Worked okay.
              
        Logged to CTD04 (latest version of P06 code that was corrupt
        on CTD03) stations 11-17 to compare bottle tag files.  CTD04
        tag files were right on the mark, and furthermore, the last
        3 channels were not scrambled. 

        CTD03 crashed stations 12, cast 1.  Restarted aqui cast 2.
        CTD03 crashed again sta 13, but logging to CTD04 so didn't
        restart CTD03 again.  Crashes seemed to indicate Ethernet
        problems.  User logged out from "mike" on ctd02 sta 12
        at exactly same time ctd03 lost connection.  Coincidence?
        Tagging offset also suggested that Ethernet was
        perhaps slowing the system down.  Decided to disconnect from
        ship's Ethernet and create own ctd network.

        Restored P06 AQUI89 code on CTD03 on 6 May and acquired sta 14
        with the same code.  Ctd04 logging in tandem as backup still.
        Sta 14 was clean and tag files were right on the mark.

        Aqui plotting code re-linked and recompiled May 8.  Seemed
        last fix to software had bug in it, so went back to plotting
        code just prior to last fix.  Aqui89 code modified May 12
        to add extra column in redt temp field in .WRW tag file
        to avoid integer overflow.

        Sta 17, CTD03 crashed again.  Likely culprits:  HE/TRitium van
        or NUTS Ethernet cables, or UPS/ship power problem.  
        He/Tr van was not working when hooked up through hydrovan
        to ctd network to ships network.  Disconnected He/Tr
        cable, wired directly to ship and Ethernet working fine.
        Thought He/Tr and hydrovan had an interrupt or board conflict.

        Winch failed sta 21 3500 m on upcast.  Only 3 bottles fired.
        Brake froze.  CTD sat 500 m off bottom for 5-6 hours before
        got working again.  Switched over to markey winch sta 22.

        After record tags edited manually and templates distributed,
        discovered numerous double-tripping of bottles.  Just about
        every station through sta 22.  Changed pylons prior to sta 23
        which proved successful.

        Sta 27 new co slope.  Markey winch failed 700 m upcast sta 27.
        Cast aborted.  CTD had to be brought on deck manually.
        Switched back to first winch.  Required second person to
        manually operate brake.

        After recovery on sta 28, CTD endcap opened.  Seacon 4 pin
        bulkhead connectors replaced.
        
        Aqui locked up sta 30 for about 2 minutes, no data written
        to tape.             
            
        Station 31 CTD03 threatened to lose connection to cluster
        (ctd02) again.  Immediately disconnected Nuts Ethernet cable and
        regained instantaneous connection.  Decided to disconnect NUTs
        cable and hook up only during steaming.  Days later, replaced
        Nuts cable with a different cable.  Hydrovan could not log in
        when this cable was connected.  NUTS Ethernet address in conflict
        with one on ship in SSG group.  Changed name and address.
        Should not have been the cause of crashes since no conflict with
        ctd network.  Days later, can have both nuts and hydrovan on
        net with no conflicts.  It was believed at end of leg 3 that
        He/Tr van had a bad cable.

        New pinger station 36.

        Swapped redt temp modules sta 59.

        New pressure temperature cals ctd 10.  Revised aqui template sta 60.
        Also cleaned conductivity cell with HCL prior to sta 60.

        Watch forgot to increase seacableI to 470ma on downcast start sta
        61 until approx. 500 m down.  Oxygen erroneous and erratic first
        500 m.  No redt temp entire cast.  
         
        Winch troubles again sta 63.  Flipped circuit breaker, power restored.
        Restart cast 2 at 10m.  Lost power one more time before cast completed.

        Error writing to 9-track sta 65.  Did a stop_watch, logger hung.
        Tried to forcex and restart several times with no success.  Killed
        grabber, re-executed sysmgr commands and restarted aqui, cast 2.
        Tape and disk okay, but no header file on disk.
        Same error to 9-track sta 69.  CTD_LOG in RWMBX state, can't
        forcex or stop_aqui, only stop/id works.

        Test rebuilt markey winch sta 69.
 
        Turn off oxygen pump sta 70.  Pump flow facing up on last
        two sta 71 & 72.  Oxygen noisy, as on sta 70.  Rotate back to
        face down on leg 4.

        Bottom (PDR) depth vs. pressure discrepancies:  sta 11,23,36,38,
        43,45,47,56,57,67.  56 & 57 drifting over slope, false bottom 
        readings?  

        Trouble with 9-track last two stations.  End of leg 3, during
        swim call, UPS's went on alarm, all 3 systems crashed.
        Believe 9-track troubles might have to do with power.

LEG 4:  Surge supressor on aqui 9-track.  CTD02 and CTD03 on UPS on
        clean power.  Repacked hard disk dua4 for acquisition.

        Reoriented oxygen pump outtake on ctd10 to face down.  

        Double cast sta 73 (ctd 7) and 74 (ctd 10) in same position
        as sta 72 on leg 3.  Attempted to first deploy ctd 9 at sta
        73, fatal failure.  Troubleshot to power supply board.
        CTD 7 deployed with old oxy sensor (bad).  Conductivity
        still looks noisy as compared to ctd 10 and ctd 9.
        Slight hysteresis in deep water t/s plot.  CTD 10, sta 74, 
        lowered with not enough current to fish.  Data noisy.  Cond 
        appears to be offset, oxygen looks offset and has different 
        shape.  Omit these two sta 73 & 74 from final ctd data set.
        Record tag data erroneous scans sta 74.

        Became apparent ctd 10, 9, and 7 wired differently. Transmiss
        ometer cable different for each instrument.

        Fatal failure ctd 10 prior to sta 76.  Switched over to ctd 9 
        with new power supply board and no oxy pump.  Scot touched case 
        and got zapped, ctd underwater cable bunged up.  Replaced with
        new one.  Signal still noisy.  Ground lug on termination broke
        off (corrosion), and had to be replaced.  Finally deployed ctd 9.  
        Interference on upcast when firing bottles.  PHANTOM  problem 
        comes and goes.

        Upon examination, sea cable bulkhead connector corroded ctd 10.  
        Salt deposits found at both end caps.  Battery pack shot with 
        salt and corrosion.  High voltage pin had corroded from getting
        wet because non-watertight plug was used for charging between
        stations on leg 3.  Epoxy connector broke down and water
        wicked in thru the pin.  Had been going on for a while on leg 3.
        Just got lucky that ctd 10 lasted through leg 3.  Took out battery
        pack and dc-dc regulator.  Removed battery fuse (not needed 
        anyway because separate conductors for ctd and rosette).  
        Oxy pump board burnt.  Power converter died.  Need replacement. 
        Jeff rigged up transistor circuit to replace orginal power converter,
        but 10 was rushed back into service before he could get the pump
        board fully checked and installed. 

        Sta 78, switched over to battery for power supply to fish
        to try and eliminate interference problem (ctd 9) but
        battery died on upcast.  As a result, upcast poor data 
        quality esp last 12 bottles, ie 600 m.

        Winch died 1880m downcast sta 79.  Gap in data.  Need to
        ctlog CU mode back at clark 1880-2100m.

        Switch over to markey winch sta 86.  Upon recabling to
        second termination, ctd 9 redt temp out.  Disconnected
        and when plugged back in, oxy sensor failed.  Deployed
        CTD 10 in its place.  Later, when ctd 9 powered up in
        wet lab, all checked okay. DIED again a few days later.
        Further examination revealed inept wiring, poor soldering
        (shoddy workmanship).  Replaced sign gen and adaptive
        sampling boards.  Power still flaky.  Checked voltages
        and found that sometimes the 6V from ctd power supply 
        was drooping because of excessive loading effects.
        Both the 2 channel digitizer and the otm board use this
        6V along with the ctd comparator and adaptive sampling.
        Since this regulator current limited to 40 mA, it really
        doesn't have enough poke to handle the load.  Fix was
        to take the 5V regulator on the OTM board (which uses the
        6V as input) and run it from the 12V regulator located
        on the same (otm) board, instead of the ctd 6V power supply.
        Now ctd 9 running like a champ.  Ctds seem to be right
        on the margin of being overloaded in terms of power.
        If put ctd 7's otm card in place of 9's (before the fix),
        ctd 9 would work.  Implies juice marginally available,
        ctd highly sensitive to minor fluctuations.        

        CTD 10 looking better leg 4 than leg 3.  Conductivity more
        consistent.  Oxygens fitting much better without pump.
        Leg 3, oxygen noisy 1st 400 m with pump.  Also, hard to
        fit oxygens at oxy mins and maxes and in deep water on
        leg 3.  Not sure whether problems related to ctd going 
        south, or problem with pumping mechanism, or simply
        because gradients much sharper on leg 3 than leg 4.

        Vaxes crashed sta 91, last record tag.  Open data files
        aqui.  Replay from audio.  Engineer checked clean power
        with scope, believes one of lines has contaminated ground.

        STA 95,97-99 offset bottle data.  Changed pylons and
        rosette firing units prior to sta 102.
       
        Cond shift ctd between sta 102 and 103.

        Inner rosette fired first sta 108-111,113-114.

        Upon recovery sta 110 (rough seas), package hit hull
        before top ring on package finally hooked with pole.
        As package brought on deck, air tugger bent frame
        (top ring) and deformed it.  Vertical bars a nightmare.

        Sta 112 deployed with ctd #9 using 24 bottle rosette.
        No transmissometer, no room for it on package.
        Oxygen failure on downcast.  Conductivity noisy bottom of 
        downcast, failure after 1st bottle on upcast.  Numerous
        leakers.  Salts poor, oxygens horrendous.  Overall, sta
        almost a complete loss.  Upon examination, ctd 9 showed
        sensor head flooded with water.  Sensor head rotated prior
        to deployment to accommodate new package.  Further
        examination revealed that # 9 tty fsk board wired to wrong
        pin.  Couldn't just swap out boards between instruments.
        Miracle any data was ever collected with this instrument!
        CTD 9 back on line 6/17/1992.

        Upon recovery sta 113, ship took roll at 40 m on upcast.
        Tow line got caught in propeller.  Blocks hit boom and
        broke off.  Vertical bars now almost impossible to put 
        in place.  Wire also came up with a kink in it.  New 
        termination prior to sta 114.  Upon recovery of sta 114, 
        cable came up with new kink.

        Vertical bars taken off rosette package sta 115.  Replaced
        with 2 horizontal bars at bottom of package.

        New top plate on pylon prior to sta 116.

        Due to inclement weather and decreased ship speed (40-45
        knot winds, ship cruising speed of 3 knots) and down time 
        for hardware problems, spacing between stations increased 
        from 40-50 nm after sta 116.

        Swapped back in 36 bottle rosette deck unit prior to sta
        120.  Previous unit (scripps) had message on grate saying
        problems with firing.

        Power outage, vaxes brought down 6/16/92 for one hour.
        Back on line for sta 121.  

        Co shift ctd sta 121.

        New termination prior to sta 122.  3rd horizontal bar
        also put on package.

        CTD02 CRASHED 6/17/92, after recovery sta 122.

        6/17/92- ship on two engines, speed to station increased
        to 11 to 12 knots.

        6/17/92 discovered that just 15 min prior to previous day's 
        power outage, hydrovan got shift in salts (fresh) while
        running autosal.  Reran afterwards, same samples now saltier.
        Apparently, autosal hooked up on 440 transformer (unreg power)
        with no UPS or surge protection.  Will hook up to clean power
        and run off BEST UPS in helium van.  Accounts for repeated
        shifts in salts and scatter for both legs 3 & 4.
        STA 124 SWAPPED OUT AUTOSALS.  Using autosal #10.  Bath
        was leaking, had to be taken apart and reglued before using.

        T/S anomaly starting at sta 128.  Saltier in deep water.
        
        Markey winch sta 133.  Lost power to winch during cast 3-4
        times.

        Switched back to AB Johnson winch sta 134.

        Vaxes crashed on downcast 700m off bottom sta 136.  Plugged
        terminal into UPS on aqui, powered off and completely shut
        off UPS and power to ctd03.  Minutes later, ctd02 crashed.
        Rebooted systems, logged rest of station as cast 2.  Replayed
        downcast from VCR tape.  9-track went offline, error msg,
        manually put online and logging resumed.

        Touched bottom sta 137.  Muddy water seeped out of frame upon
        recovery.  Wire came up with two kinks.  Cond shifted sta 138.

        Winch failed at bottom of downcast sta 139.  CTD package 
        dragged on bottom until ship increased speed to increase wire 
        angle.

        Increased ship speed (12-13 knots) and increased speed at
        haulback of ctd (80 m/min) warranted changing sta spacing to
        40 nm again after sta 139, until mooring line.

        Station 141 (ctd #9) and 142 (ctd #10) double cast.  Test
        resurrected ctd #9.  Performed like a champ.  Funny oxy blip.
        New 24 bottle pylon sta 141 to try and alleviate non-confirmations 
        for bottles 11 & 12.  

        Kinks in wire warranted new termination sta 145.  

        Took vaxes off UPS to reset from home to generator mode.
        Widened frequency window.  Systems back on UPS sta 148.

        Hangar hoist repaired prior to sta 150.  Upon recovery of sta
        149, control handle cable pulled out, lead disconnected.  Had to 
        Reengage strain release boot.  After switching pylons at sta 141, 
        became evident 24 bottle rosette double tripping.  Swapped out
        24 bottle pylon back to original.  Replaced bulkhead connector.
        No more double trips.

        Sta 156, error logging to 9-track.  Log upcast as cast 2.
        Upon recovery, found cable between ctd and rosette caught
        in bottle 35.  Ok.

        Disable transmissometer sta 156-179, spec'd out to only
        5500 m.

        Power failure prior to sta 157.  Ctd lifted off deck. 9-track
        offline.  Brought ctd back to deck.  Stopped aqui.  Power
        outage.  Systems stayed up on UPS.  Power came back on,
        restarted station.  Believe power to have been cause of 
        problem (9-track going offline) on sta 156.  9-track
        has narrower window of frequency operation than  UPS's.

        Spikes at 2100,4400,5500 dbars sta 156-167 on down and up
        cast.  Erroneous tags in .wrw file.  Cable appears to be
        cause.

        Prior to sta 168, swapped ctd signal and 12 bottle pylon
        conductors.  No more spikes, data clean.

        Kermadec Trench sta 174-175.  CTD taken down to approx.
        6900 dbars.  CTD pressure transducer maxed out at 6553.5 
        dbars.  Spike in co, te, and ox at bottom.  Pressure for 
        last two rec tags estimated from wire out.  Could be off
        by 15 dbars.   

        Prior to sta 179, took out large air bubble in ctd 10 oxy 
        sensor.  Refilled with oil.

        Transmissometer on again sta 180.

        Sta 182 EAST longitude.

        Fired inner rosette first sta 183,185,188.

        AQUI89 mag tapes recorded on low density (800 bpi) sta 185 & 186.

        Double cast sta 187 (ctd 9) and sta 188 (ctd 10).  Sta 187
        had another funny oxy blip similar to 141.  Could not fit ctd
        oxygen to bottle oxygen sta 187.  Recommend new oxy sensor if
        ctd 9 used on leg 5.  Conductivity looks fine.

        At end of leg 4, rosette troubles.  Getting confirmed firings but
        pins not releasing because sticking due to salt deposit buildup.
        Pylon was not being lubricated regularly.  Sprayed liberally
        with CRC sta 185.  Bottles 23 &  24 not confirming.  Believe
        cause is harness plug.  Pete will replace prior to leg 5.
        Realigned motor housing on two backup pylons, now ready to go
        if need be.

LEG 5:  At dock in Auckland, the DEC software Licenses expired.  This
        killed things like mail (critically necessary for AQUI), Fortran
        compilers, and communications (ftp and telnet).  Appearantly the
        microvaxes were shipped before the current license upgrade got
        to WHOI, so were not upgraded....  Tom B. Warren and Cyndy all
        assisted with sending along the appropriate fixes.  thank god
        for Fax & telex.  Necessary operations were back up before 
        leaving Auckland at 1600 July 13 (but it was close). 
 
        Stations 189 & 190 were repeats ot 187 & 188 at the end of leg4.
        187 and 189 were with ctd 9, 188 and 190 were with ctd10.  Ctd10
        still looks fine, so will continue to use with no modifications.  

        Stn 201 Crashed CTD (60m/min) because missed a wrap on the pdr.  The 
        only obvious problem was that the bolts securing the ctd to the frame
        had sheared, and the ctd itself was loose on recovery.  Swapped
        to the other winch while reterminating, but just as got the fish
        in the water the power went off on the winch, and so had to wait
        for Peter to -terminate.

        Post crash nums look pretty good.  There's a slight salinity
        shift in the deep water, that John thinks is due to conductivity
        shift, not temperature.  (the FSI ctd's temp offset is what is
        was pre-crash)


BOTTOM CONTACT:   Sta 137,139 : 201,252
                 
PROBLEM STATIONS: Tag files sta 74, 78 & 112.  Power low, erroneous tags.
                  Recreated from raw downcast data.
                  Downcast 1800-2100 sta 79 due to winch failure.  Need
                  to ctlog cu mode cut and paste.
                  Sta 112- no oxy downcast.  Cond noisy end of downcast,
                  failed on upcast.  Sensor head flooded.
                  No bottle data sta 141 test ctd 9.  Could not calibrate
                  oxygens.  Test ctd 9 again sta 187.  Could not fit
                  ctd oxy to bottle oxygens.     

                  193 - has a very spiky 1st record that cannot be
                  removed with ctded78.  tried upping the pmin, and
                  recmin, and in both cases the 1st recore remained,
                  and the second record changed.

                  215 & 228 HAD SAM SPIKE AT THE BEGINNING  AS 193. all
                  were fixed by using ctlog to copy records X to Y of
                  the file to 9-track, then ctded-ing 1,y-x from the 
                  9-track.

                  246 had an GNXTR error and would not read at all in
                  plt78, so couldn't even find the record limits.
                  Reprocessed to disk from audio, and then worked OK.





SUMMARY OF FITS TO THE LABORATORY DATA

CTD 10:
-------------------
CTD10 PRESSURE
  PRECRUISE FIT 
-------------------
  LABFIT: FHBIAS,Pslope
   0.00000000E-01       0.10000000
         MEAN CCR = ????????????   
    PRS ROOM TEMP = 22.70
  PROGRAM VERSION   RUSCAL  910316  
        DISK FILE = 10mr92pr.cal        
         VARIABLE = PRESSURE        
   19 DATA POINTS   ORDER OF POLY  2

 POLY COEF =-.246449E+00 0.100352E+00 -.294565E-08 

                INSTRUMENT     OBSERVED      CALCULATED       DIFFERENCE
               -----------    -----------    -----------      ----------
     1             1.80000       0.120000      -0.065816       0.185816
     2          7283.40        730.609985     730.498962       0.111012
     3         14156.4        1419.780030    1419.782230      -0.002208
     4         21029.4        2109.010010    2108.787110       0.223012
     5         27905.8        2798.260010    2797.854740       0.405385
     6         34783.2        3487.540040    3486.743410       0.796742
     7         41668.4        4176.810060    4176.134280       0.675649
     8         48559.6        4866.129880    4865.846190       0.283559
     9         55450.4        5555.439940    5555.238770       0.201039
    10         62343.6        6244.799800    6244.591310       0.208363
    11         55457.6        5555.439940    5555.958980      -0.519176
    12         48568.6        4866.129880    4866.747070      -0.617320
    13         41680.2        4176.810060    4177.315430      -0.505504
    14         34793.0        3487.540040    3487.724850      -0.184703
    15         27912.2        2798.260010    2798.495850      -0.235728
    16         21037.0        2109.010010    2109.549070      -0.538951
    17         14159.6        1419.780030    1420.103030      -0.323009
    18          7287.00        730.609985     730.860046      -0.250072
    19             2.80000       0.120000       0.034535       0.085465
      MEAN DEVIATION = -0.329794E-04
  STANDARD DEVIATION =  0.406677E+00


-------------------
CTD10 PRESSURE
  POSTCRUISE FIT 
-------------------

  LABFIT: FHBIAS,Pslope
   0.00000000E-01   0.10000000
         MEAN CCR = ????????????   
    PRS ROOM TEMP = 21.40
  PROGRAM VERSION   RUSCAL  910316  
        DISK FILE = 10se92pr.cal        
         VARIABLE = PRESSURE        
   21 DATA POINTS   ORDER OF POLY  2

 POLY COEF =-.139633E+01 0.100309E+00 -.251698E-08 

                INSTRUMENT     OBSERVED      CALCULATED       DIFFERENCE
               -----------    -----------    -----------      ----------
     1             8.80000       0.060000      -0.513614       0.573614
     2          3859.40        385.940002     385.697021       0.242978
     3          7298.40        730.559998     730.561646      -0.001620
     4         14171.8        1419.729980    1419.651000       0.078946
     5         21047.0        2108.969970    2108.683110       0.286954
     6         27925.0        2798.239990    2797.757570       0.482510
     7         34805.0        3487.520020    3486.794190       0.725919
     8         41692.0        4176.799800    4176.292970       0.506680
     9         48582.8        4866.120120    4865.933110       0.186856
    10         55473.4        5555.450200    5555.314940       0.135098
    11         62368.0        6244.810060    6244.856930      -0.047031
    12         55474.6        5555.450200    5555.434570       0.015469
    13         48590.2        4866.120120    4866.673830      -0.553867
    14         41702.6        4176.799800    4177.353520      -0.553867
    15         34814.4        3487.520020    3487.735350      -0.215243
    16         27932.8        2798.239990    2798.538820      -0.298740
    17         21053.0        2108.969970    2109.284180      -0.314120
    18         14176.2        1419.729980    1420.092040      -0.362094
    19          7303.00        730.559998     731.022888      -0.462863
    20          3865.80        385.940002     386.338867      -0.398868
    21            14.8000        0.060000       0.088237      -0.028237
      MEAN DEVIATION = -0.726130E-04
  STANDARD DEVIATION =  0.380907E+00



---------------------------------
CTD10 PRESSURE
  COMBINATION FIT (FINAL FIT)
---------------------------------

  LABFIT: FHBIAS,Pslope
   0.00000000E-01   0.10000000
         MEAN CCR = ????????????   
    PRS ROOM TEMP = 22.70
  PROGRAM VERSION   RUSCAL  910316  
        DISK FILE = pr10bc.cal          
         VARIABLE = PRESSURE        
   40 DATA POINTS   ORDER OF POLY  2

 POLY COEF =-.436677E+00 0.100333E+00 -.276775E-08 

                INSTRUMENT     OBSERVED      CALCULATED       DIFFERENCE
               -----------    -----------    -----------      ----------
     1             1.20000       0.120000      -0.316277       0.436277
     2          7282.80        730.609985     730.122681       0.487275
     3         14155.8        1419.780030    1419.304570       0.475495
     4         21028.8        2109.010010    2108.224610       0.785309
     5         27905.2        2798.260010    2797.224120       1.035798
     6         34782.6        3487.540040    3486.062010       1.477937
     7         41667.8        4176.810060    4175.418950       1.391267
     8         48559.0        4866.129880    4865.114260       1.015778
     9         55449.8        5555.439940    5554.506350       0.933747
    10         62343.0        6244.799800    6243.874510       0.925446
    11         55457.0        5555.439940    5555.226070       0.214020
    12         48568.0        4866.129880    4866.014160       0.115876
    13         41679.6        4176.810060    4176.600100       0.210114
    14         34792.4        3487.540040    3487.043460       0.496491
    15         27911.6        2798.260010    2797.865480       0.394440
    16         21036.4        2109.010010    2108.986330       0.023591
    17         14159.0        1419.780030    1419.625370       0.154694
    18          7286.40        730.609985     730.483704       0.126252
    19             2.20000       0.120000      -0.215944       0.335944
    20             0.600000      0.060000      -0.376477       0.436477
    21          3851.20        385.940002     385.925262       0.014741
    22          7290.20        730.559998     730.864868      -0.304900
    23         14163.6        1419.729980    1420.086550      -0.356536
    24         21038.8        2108.969970    2109.226810      -0.256927
    25         27916.8        2798.239990    2798.386230      -0.146331
    26         34796.8        3487.520020    3487.483890       0.036042
    27         41683.8        4176.799800    4177.020510      -0.220550
    28         48574.6        4866.120120    4866.674800      -0.554534
    29         55465.2        5555.450200    5556.046390      -0.596038
    30         62359.8        6244.810060    6245.555180      -0.744964
    31         55466.4        5555.450200    5556.166500      -0.716155
    32         48582.0        4866.120120    4867.415530      -1.295257
    33         41694.4        4176.799800    4178.082030      -1.282073
    34         34806.2        3487.520020    3488.425540      -0.905608
    35         27924.6        2798.239990    2799.167720      -0.927825
    36         21044.8        2108.969970    2109.828120      -0.858245
    37         14168.0        1419.729980    1420.527710      -0.797698
    38         7294.80         730.559998     731.326172      -0.766204
    39         3857.60         385.940002     386.567261      -0.627258
    40            6.60000        0.060000       0.225522      -0.165522
      MEAN DEVIATION = 0.957400E-05
  STANDARD DEVIATION = 0.707909E+00




CTD 9
-------------------
CTD9 PRESSURE
  PRECRUISE FIT 
-------------------

  LABFIT: FHBIAS,Pslope
   0.00000000E-01   0.10000000
         MEAN CCR = 0.000000E+00   
    PRS ROOM TEMP = 20.80
  PROGRAM VERSION   RUSCAL  910316  
        DISK FILE = 9MR92PR.cal         
         VARIABLE = PRESSURE        
   19 DATA POINTS   ORDER OF POLY  2

 POLY COEF =0.450652E+00 0.100557E+00 0.297377E-09 

                INSTRUMENT     OBSERVED      CALCULATED       DIFFERENCE
               -----------    -----------    -----------      ----------
     1            -6.00000       0.090000      -0.152691       0.242691
     2          7256.00        730.590027     730.108582       0.481416
     3         14108.8        1419.770020    1419.249880       0.520173
     4         20962.0        2109.010010    2108.459470       0.550569
     5         27815.0        2798.280030    2797.676510       0.603547
     6         34668.4        3487.570070    3486.961910       0.608186
     7         41521.4        4176.850100    4176.235350       0.614778
     8         48378.6        4866.189940    4865.958500       0.231477
     9         55231.2        5555.509770    5555.247070       0.262727
    10         62088.4        6244.879880    6245.026370      -0.146453
    11         55236.2        5555.509770    5555.750000      -0.240203
    12         48382.6        4866.189940    4866.360840      -0.170867
    13         41531.0        4176.850100    4177.200680      -0.350554
    14         34680.4        3487.570070    3488.168700      -0.598601
    15         27825.6        2798.280030    2798.742680      -0.462615
    16         20977.8        2109.010010    2110.048340      -1.038299
    17         14119.8        1419.770020    1420.356200      -0.586150
    18          7264.40        730.590027     730.953308      -0.363311
    19            -2.00000       0.090000       0.249538      -0.159538
      MEAN DEVIATION = -0.541398E-04
  STANDARD DEVIATION =  0.498984E+00


-------------------
CTD9 PRESSURE
  POSTCRUISE FIT 
-------------------
  LABFIT: FHBIAS,Pslope
   0.00000000E-01   0.10000000
         MEAN CCR = ????????????   
    PRS ROOM TEMP = 22.00
  PROGRAM VERSION   RUSCAL  910316  
        DISK FILE = C9SE92PR.cal        
         VARIABLE = PRESSURE        
   21 DATA POINTS   ORDER OF POLY  2

 POLY COEF =0.365801E+01 0.100568E+00 0.405269E-09 

                INSTRUMENT     OBSERVED      CALCULATED       DIFFERENCE
               -----------    -----------    -----------      ----------
     1           -40.0000        0.040000      -0.364729       0.404729
     2          3797.60        385.920013     385.582794       0.337229
     3          7225.00        730.539978     730.286560       0.253428
     4         14076.4        1419.709960    1419.380620       0.329295
     5         20927.2        2108.949950    2108.452390       0.497508
     6         27778.2        2798.209960    2797.582520       0.627390
     7         34630.0        3487.489990    3486.831050       0.658885
     8         41480.6        4176.770020    4175.997070       0.773142
     9         48337.2        4866.100100    4865.804690       0.295603
    10         55190.8        5555.419920    5555.348630       0.071482
    11         62044.0        6244.779790    6244.890140      -0.110158
    12         55192.2        5555.419920    5555.489750      -0.069631
    13         48343.6        4866.100100    4866.448240      -0.347951
    14         41493.2        4176.770020    4177.264650      -0.494436
    15         34641.6        3487.489990    3487.997560      -0.507619
    16         27791.4        2798.209960    2798.910160      -0.700246
    17         20937.0        2108.949950    2109.438230      -0.488332
    18         14085.8        1419.709960    1420.326050      -0.616140
    19          7232.40        730.539978     731.030823      -0.490835
    20          3804.20        385.920013     386.246582      -0.326559
    21           -35.0000        0.040000       0.138113      -0.098113
      MEAN DEVIATION = -0.633136E-04
  STANDARD DEVIATION =  0.464840E+00



---------------------------------
CTD9 PRESSURE
  COMBINATION FIT (FINAL FIT)
---------------------------------
  LABFIT: FHBIAS,Pslope
   0.00000000E-01   0.10000000
         MEAN CCR = ????????????   
    PRS ROOM TEMP = 20.80
  PROGRAM VERSION   RUSCAL  910316  
        DISK FILE = pr9bc.cal           
         VARIABLE = PRESSURE        
   40 DATA POINTS   ORDER OF POLY  2

 POLY COEF =-.338764E+00 0.100564E+00 0.338159E-09 

                INSTRUMENT     OBSERVED      CALCULATED       DIFFERENCE
               -----------    -----------    -----------      ----------
     1             0.900000      0.090000      -0.248257       0.338257
     2          7262.90        730.590027     730.064148       0.525898
     3         14115.7        1419.770020    1419.257450       0.512592
     4         20968.9        2109.010010    2108.522710       0.487202
     5         27821.9        2798.280030    2797.799560       0.480366
     6         34675.3        3487.570070    3487.148930       0.421039
     7         41527.3        4176.850100    4176.388670       0.461323
     8         48385.5        4866.189940    4866.283690      -0.093853
     9         55238.1        5555.509770    5555.647950      -0.138287
    10         62095.3        6244.879880    6245.505860      -0.626080
    11         55243.1        5555.509770    5556.150880      -0.641216
    12         48389.5        4866.189940    4866.686520      -0.496685
    13         41537.9        4176.850100    4177.454590      -0.604595
    14         34687.3        3487.570070    3488.355960      -0.785992
    15         27832.5        2798.280030    2798.865970      -0.586041
    16         20984.7        2109.010010    2110.111820      -1.101910
    17         14126.7        1419.770020    1420.363890      -0.593853
    18          7271.30        730.590027     730.908875      -0.318829
    19             4.90000       0.090000       0.153999      -0.063999
    20             0.400000      0.040000      -0.298539       0.338538
    21          3838.00        385.920013     385.630157       0.289844
    22          7265.40        730.539978     730.315552       0.224445
    23         14116.8        1419.709960    1419.368160       0.341816
    24         20967.6        2108.949950    2108.391850       0.558002
    25         27818.6        2798.209960    2797.468020       0.741840
    26         34670.4        3487.489990    3486.655760       0.834125
    27         41521.0        4176.770020    4175.754880       1.015034
    28         48377.6        4866.100100    4865.489260       0.610737
    29         55231.2        5555.419920    5554.953610       0.466205
    30         62084.4        6244.779790    6244.409670       0.370014
    31         55232.6        5555.419920    5555.094240       0.325580
    32         48384.0        4866.100100    4866.133300      -0.033306
    33         41533.6        4176.770020    4177.021970      -0.252056
    34         34682.0        3487.489990    3487.822750      -0.332867
    35         27831.8        2798.209960    2798.795410      -0.585552
    36         20977.4        2108.949950    2109.377690      -0.427838
    37         14126.2        1419.709960    1420.313600      -0.603619
    38          7272.80        730.539978     731.059814      -0.519817
    39          3844.60        385.920013     386.293915      -0.373913
    40             5.40000       0.040000       0.204281      -0.164281
      MEAN DEVIATION = -0.432690E-04
  STANDARD DEVIATION =  0.528148E+00





@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

                          TEMPERATURE

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@


Both CTD 9 and 10 have pre and post cruise temperature calibrations
that show a shift has occurred in the sensors. With each CTD having been
opened and sensor arms rotated to fit in a specific frame, the shift is
not surprising. The fits look good although CTD 10's post cruise
calibration fit has a higher standard deviation than it's pre cruise cal.

CTD10:  
Temperature data scaled with the CTD 10 pre cruise calibration
terms matches quite closely the redundant temperature data scaled with
its post cruise calibration. 


Stations 64 to 75:      CTD - Red. Temperature = 3.3466e-04
Stations 86 to 94:      CTD - Red. Temperature = 6.8729e-04

The difference changes by .0003 degrees. CTD10 failed and was opened to
effect repair after station 75 which could account for the change. The
change however is small enough to ignore. This relative consistency
supports CTD10's pre cruise calibration  being  applied to the all of
CTD10's stations.

CTD9:  
CTD9, the backup CTD was called into service at two different
times. The first time was for stations 76 through 85. Temperature data
scaled with the CTD9 pre cruise calibration terms compared to the
neighboring CTD10 data with its pre cruise calibration differ by
6.0131e-3, CTD9 is colder.  For  CTD9 data to match CTD10 and the
redundent temperature data, the bias in CTD9's scaling terms was
adjusted by this amount.

In the second group, stations 248 through 267, CTD9 differs from the
redundent temperature  by 1.77767e-02, CTD colder.  The difference
between CTD9's pre and post cruise cal is 1.77e-02, CTD drifting
colder.  The difference between CTD9 being scaled with the corrected
terms for stations 76 through 85, and the postcruise cal is 1.2012e-02.
This indicates that the post cruise cal will be a good one to use on
the second set, stations 248 to 267, and that a bias adjusted of 6e-3
to the pre cruise cals to scale the first set, is appropriate.


--------------------------
TEMPERATURE: quadratic fit 
--------------------------

                          BIAS         SLOPE        QUADRATIC   
                      -----------  ------------  -------------
   PRE-CRUISE  CTD10   .186416E-2    .499864E-3    .225955E-11 
               CTD9   -.361583E-1    .500248E-3    .197920E-11
               
   POST-CRUISE CTD10  -.803350E-03  0.499708E-03  0.310515E-11 
               CTD9   -.189004E-01  0.500366E-03  0.160650E-11 
         
   SCALING TERMS USED
   ALL STA     CTD10   .186416E-2    .499864E-3    .225955E-11 
   STA 76-85   CTD9   -.30145E-1     .500248E-3    .197920E-11
   STA 248-267 CTD9   -.188737E-01   .500365E-3    .162401E-11 



CTD 9,10= temperature time lag of .25 seconds

Temperature lag checked for each CTD by plotting theta v. salinity and
looking for consistent looping in the high gradient areas of the 
thermocline. Consistent looping, indicating density inversions, would 
be caused by an incorrect temperature lag. Minimal looping was found.
Station plots that did show looping also had non uniform descent rates.
The non uniform descent rate, probably due to the sea state, could
have caused density inversion because the large rosette package may have 
been pulling masses of water around with it as it bounced up and down, 
thus truly measuring a density inversion although it was created by 
the package. 



SUMMARY OF FITS TO LABORATORY DATA

-------------------
CTD10 TEMPERATURE
  PRE CRUISE 
-------------------
  PROGRAM VERSION    RUSCAL  910316  
  DISK FILE = 10mr92te.cal        
       VARIABLE=TEMPERATURE     
         5 DATA POINTS          ORDER OF POLY  2

 POLY COEF =0.186416E-02 0.499864E-03 0.225955E-11 

                INSTRUMENT      OBSERVED      CALCULATED      DIFFERENCE
     1         60034.8          30.019218      30.019215       0.000003
     2         45060.4          22.530518      22.530500       0.000016
     3         30038.4          15.018928      15.019004      -0.000076
     4         15429.6           7.715182       7.715096       0.000086
     5          1086.00          0.544688       0.544719      -0.000031
  MEAN DEVIATION =  -0.274321E-06
  STANDARD DEVIATION =  0.598524E-04



-------------------
CTD10 TEMPERATURE
  POST CRUISE 
-------------------

  PROGRAM VERSION    RUSCAL  910316  
  DISK FILE = C10E92TE.cal        
       VARIABLE=TEMPERATURE     
         7 DATA POINTS          ORDER OF POLY  2

 POLY COEF =-.803350E-03 0.499708E-03 0.310515E-11 

                INSTRUMENT      OBSERVED      CALCULATED      DIFFERENCE
     1         60224.0          30.104589      30.104853      -0.000263
     2         48914.0          24.449780      24.449326       0.000454
     3         39992.0          19.989140      19.988472       0.000668
     4         30096.0          15.040070      15.041211      -0.001141
     5         19990.0           9.988570       9.989594      -0.001023
     6         10696.0           5.346520       5.344425       0.002095
     7           952.000         0.474130       0.474921      -0.000791
  MEAN DEVIATION =  -0.111917E-06
  STANDARD DEVIATION =   0.116087E-02



-------------------
CTD9  TEMPERATURE
  PRE CRUISE 
-------------------
  PROGRAM VERSION    RUSCAL  910316  
  DISK FILE = C9AP92TE.cal        
       VARIABLE=TEMPERATURE     
         5 DATA POINTS          ORDER OF POLY  2

 POLY COEF =-.361583E-01 0.500248E-03 0.197920E-11 

              INSTRUMENT        OBSERVED      CALCULATED      DIFFERENCE
     1         60039.6          30.005600      30.005671      -0.000070
     2         45048.4          22.503328      22.503235       0.000094
     3         30064.0          15.005210      15.005088       0.000122
     4         15066.0           7.500756       7.501028      -0.000272
     5          1181.60          0.555058       0.554938       0.000120
  MEAN DEVIATION =  -0.106618E-05
  STANDARD DEVIATION =   0.171104E-03



-------------------
CTD9 TEMPERATURE
  POST CRUISE 
-------------------

  PROGRAM VERSION    RUSCAL  910316  
  DISK FILE = C9SE92TE.cal        
       VARIABLE=TEMPERATURE     
         7 DATA POINTS          ORDER OF POLY  2

 POLY COEF =-.189004E-01 0.500366E-03 0.160650E-11 

              INSTRUMENT        OBSERVED      CALCULATED      DIFFERENCE
     1         59366.0          29.691441      29.691519      -0.000078
     2         49798.0          24.902460      24.902334       0.000126
     3         40212.0          20.104509      20.104435       0.000075
     4         30183.0          15.084920      15.085126      -0.000206
     5         19074.0           9.525800       9.525675       0.000125
     6          9922.00          4.945820       4.945894      -0.000074
     7          2734.00          1.349150       1.349114       0.000036
  MEAN DEVIATION =   0.755170E-06
  STANDARD DEVIATION =   0.124119E-03






@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

                       CONDUCTIVITY

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@


The WHOI CTD Group conducts laboratory conductivity calibrations to check 
instrument functionality and to obtain initial scaling factors to relate 
instrument output to ocean conductivity.  These are updated/refined/replaced 
with scalings based on water sample data.  


SUMMARY OF LABORATORY DATA

                          BIAS         SLOPE       

   PRE-CRUISE  CTD10  -.177214E-2    .100631E-2 
               CTD9   -.231510E-1    .997986E-3 

   POST-CRUISE CTD10  -.163660E-02  0.100915E-02 
               CTD9   -.119142E-01  0.100050E-02 



-------------------
CTD10 CONDUCTIVITY
  PRE CRUISE 
-------------------

  LABFIT: FHBIAS,Pslope
   0.00000000E-01       0.10000000
  MEAN CCR= 0.100626E-02   PRS ROOM TEMP=  19.99
  PROGRAM VERSION    RUSCAL  910316  
  DISK FILE = 10mr92co.cal        
       VARIABLE=CONDUCTIVITY    
         5 DATA POINTS          ORDER OF POLY  1

 POLY COEF =-.177214E-02 0.100631E-02 

                INSTRUMENT      OBSERVED      CALCULATED      DIFFERENCE
     1         57872.2          58.235512      58.235428       0.000082
     2         46892.1          47.185162      47.186073      -0.000913
     3         41586.0          41.848011      41.846500       0.001509
     4         33214.6          33.421310      33.422283      -0.000974
     5         25064.2          25.220819      25.220535       0.000284
  MEAN DEVIATION =  -0.245608E-05
  STANDARD DEVIATION =   0.101838E-02


-------------------
CTD10 CONDUCTIVITY
  POST CRUISE 
-------------------

  PROGRAM VERSION    RUSCAL  910316  
  DISK FILE = 10se92co.cal        
       VARIABLE=CONDUCTIVITY    
         5 DATA POINTS          ORDER OF POLY  1

 POLY COEF =-.163660E-02 0.100915E-02 

                INSTRUMENT      OBSERVED      CALCULATED      DIFFERENCE
     1         62200.1          62.767502      62.767540      -0.000038
     2         54831.1          55.331310      55.331127       0.000183
     3         41825.4          42.206329      42.206493      -0.000164
     4         34402.9          34.715900      34.716015      -0.000114
     5         25132.9          25.361401      25.361259       0.000141
  MEAN DEVIATION =   0.161610E-05
  STANDARD DEVIATION =   0.154037E-03


-------------------
CTD9 CONDUCTIVITY
  PRE CRUISE 
-------------------

  LABFIT: FHBIAS,Pslope
   0.00000000E-01       0.10000000
  MEAN CCR= 0.997355E-03   PRS ROOM TEMP=  19.99
  PROGRAM VERSION    RUSCAL  910316  
  DISK FILE = C9AP92CO.cal        
       VARIABLE=CONDUCTIVITY    
         5 DATA POINTS          ORDER OF POLY  1

 POLY COEF =-.231510E-01 0.997986E-03 

                INSTRUMENT      OBSERVED      CALCULATED      DIFFERENCE
     1         55291.9          55.158146      55.157375       0.000770
     2         45172.9          45.058846      45.058811       0.000034
     3         40757.0          40.650867      40.651749      -0.000882
     4         32971.0          32.880333      32.881477      -0.001145
     5         23982.6          23.912357      23.911146       0.001211
  MEAN DEVIATION =  -0.228733E-05
  STANDARD DEVIATION =   0.101834E-02


-------------------
CTD9 CONDUCTIVITY
  POST CRUISE 
-------------------

  LABFIT: FHBIAS,Pslope
   0.00000000E-01       0.10000000
  MEAN CCR= 0.100018E-02   PRS ROOM TEMP=  19.99
  PROGRAM VERSION    RUSCAL  910316  
  DISK FILE = C9SE92CO.cal        

       VARIABLE=CONDUCTIVITY   

         5 DATA POINTS          ORDER OF POLY  1

 POLY COEF =-.119142E-01 0.100050E-02 

              INSTRUMENT        OBSERVED      CALCULATED      DIFFERENCE
     1         58219.4          58.237228      58.236534       0.000695
     2         48291.3          48.303188      48.303532      -0.000342
     3         39531.9          39.539108      39.539745      -0.000636
     4         32529.1          32.532810      32.533413      -0.000602
     5         23647.8          23.648640      23.647747       0.000894
  MEAN DEVIATION =   0.162441E-05
  STANDARD DEVIATION =   0.735835E-03



FITTING PROCEDURE USING STATION WATER SAMPLE SALINITIES

Basic fitting procedures followed that of Millard (1982) and Millard and Yang 
(1993).  The process was initiated by taking a subset of stations having high-
quality water sample salinity data, 137 to 175, and refit comparing 

     a)fitting for slope and bias, full depth 
     b)fitting for slope using avg of pre and post cruise bias, full depth 
     c)fitting for slope using bias found in a), with observations 1100db 
     d)fitting for slope using bias from b), with observations 1100db 

a) and b) gave similar enough slopes and c) and d) were similar to 
both a) and b) so we decided to go with using the averaged pre and 
post cruise laboratory bias and fit throughout the cruise just for 
slope.  We further concluded that the nominal coefficient for 
conductivity cell distortion under pressure of beta=1.5E-8 gave 
acceptable results in the deep ocean (where this term has the most 
noticeable effect).

However, careful examination of the CTD - watersample conductivity data
from the thermocline revealed several irregularities (curvature of
the CTD-watersample residuals in pressure and temperature).  Several
non-standard procedures were implemented in order that the final
calibrated CTD salinity downcasts were consistent with the water sample
salinity data.  In addition to altering alpha, the coefficient of
thermal expansion of conductivity cell from its nominal value of
-6.5E-6, an empirical correction to the conductivities in the upper
third of the ocean was implemented in order that the derived CTD
salinity data agreed with the water samples.  The correction was, as
stated, done to the raw CTD conductivity data, although it may have
been equivalently applied to the CTD temperature.  The small magnitude
of the shift (around 0.002 psu) was such that we could not distinguish.
It is suspicious that the empirical correction was needed for CTD
stations collected with instrument #10 after it had failed on Leg 4 and
been opened for repair.  This hints that it may have been a temperature
shift.  However, as the error signal was detected in salinity, we
decided to alter conductivity.




SUMMARY OF NON-STANDARD CORRECTIONS TO CONDUCTIVITY:

CTD #10

Sta 1 to 75, 86 to 247
  reduced alpha by half in cond cal to increase surface CTD salt by .002 
  psu at the surface to attempt to straighten out hooked line Pv salt diff.
  Change alpha so that it is consistent for CTD 10 throughout cruise.
  Alpha = -3.25e-6 for all CTD 10 stations.

Sta 86 to 246 
  added an emperically determined conductivity offset (which was a
  function of pressure) to the downcast CTD conductivity profile data and
  the upcast data collected at the time of water bottle tripping.  The
  offset C-off was of the form:

            C-off = 1.47781E-8 *{P**2} * exp{-[P/500]}

The offset was thus zero at the surface, approached zero exponentially
at depth and had a maximum effect of 0.002 mmho at 1000 dbars.



Sta 76 to 85 CTD 9
  alpha was increased above the nominal value to reduce surface 
  CTD salt. Alpha set to -16.25e-6.


Sta 249 to 267 CTD9
  the nominal alpha of -6.5E-6 was employed successfully for these data.
  It is not known why a different value from the earlier station group worked.


Given these shaping parameters, conductivity slope factors were derived
by regression against the water sample data following standard procedures.

****************************************************************
KN138 Conductivity scalings applied to the final P06 data
    (fitting groups and fit statistics)




**********************************************
CTD10  CTD10  CTD10  CTD10  CTD10  CTD10
**********************************************


LEG 3 CTD10
      CHILE TO EASTER ISLAND 
      STATIONS 4-72


Stations 4,5,9 to 19        Use fit of stations 6 to 19
  number of data points read in:    212
STATIONS     6.   19.  PRES. BOUNDS    1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
 Applied cond. bias: -0.0016
 PASS No. =           8
     St.#,  P,    T,     C,     COEFF.            GOOD
   1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.10062730E-02   0.935E+05
   2  1.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   -.19822450E-08    2.59    
  N=    175 AVE=   -0.85378E-06 STD. DEV.=    0.11202E-02
   STATION     COND. SLOPE
        6.  0.10062611E-02
        7.  0.10062591E-02
        8.  0.10062572E-02
        9.  0.10062552E-02
       10.  0.10062532E-02
       11.  0.10062512E-02
       12.  0.10062492E-02
       13.  0.10062472E-02
       14.  0.10062453E-02
       15.  0.10062433E-02
       16.  0.10062413E-02
       17.  0.10062393E-02
       18.  0.10062373E-02
       19.  0.10062354E-02


Station 6
  Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 6 ot 19) to match 
  water sample data and CTD traces.
  new slope:  0.100624e-2


Station 7
  Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 6 to 19) to match 
  water sample data and CTD traces.
  new slope: 0.100624e-2


Station 8 
  Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 6 to 19) to match water
  sample data and CTD traces.
  new slope: 0.100624e-2


Stations 22,23,24,28,29,31 to 40    Use fit of stations 20 to 40
  number of data points read in:    309
STATIONS    20.   40.  PRES. BOUNDS    1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
 Applied cond. bias: -0.0016
 PASS No. =           5
      St.#,  P,    T,     C,     COEFF.            GOOD
   1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.10062870E-02   0.312E+06
  N=    292 AVE=   -0.89956E-06 STD. DEV.=    0.17366E-02


Station 20
  Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 20 to 40) to match water 
  sample data and CTD traces.
  new slope:  0.100631e-2


Station 21
  Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 20 to 40) to match
  water sample data and CTD traces.
  new slope: 0.100631e-2
  

Station 25
  Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 20 to 40) to match water 
  sample data and CTD traces.
  new slope:  0.100627e-2
  

Station 26
  Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 20 to 40) to match
  water sample data and CTD traces.
  new slope: 0.100627e-2
  

Station 27
  Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 20 to 40) to match water 
  sample data and CTD traces.
  new slope:  0.100627e-2
  

Station 30
  Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 20 to 40) to match
  water sample data and CTD traces.
  new slope: 0.100624e-2
  

Stations 41 to 55
  number of data points read in:    242
STATIONS    41.   55.  PRES. BOUNDS    1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
 Applied cond. bias: -0.0016
 PASS No. =           5
      St.#,  P,    T,     C,     COEFF.            GOOD
   1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.10063006E-02   0.297E+06
  N=    230 AVE=    0.84329E-06 STD. DEV.=    0.16192E-02


Stations 56 to 58, 60 to 68    Use fit of stations 56 to 68
  number of data points read in:    203
STATIONS    56.   68.  PRES. BOUNDS    1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
 Applied cond. bias: -0.0016
 PASS No. =           4
      St.#,  P,    T,     C,     COEFF.            GOOD
   1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.10066862E-02   0.143E+05
   2  1.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   -.74668625E-08    6.59    
  N=    200 AVE=    0.61313E-06 STD. DEV.=    0.19213E-02
   STATION     COND. SLOPE
       56.  0.10062680E-02
       57.  0.10062606E-02
       58.  0.10062531E-02
       59.  0.10062456E-02
       60.  0.10062382E-02
       61.  0.10062307E-02
       62.  0.10062232E-02
       63.  0.10062157E-02
       64.  0.10062083E-02
       65.  0.10062008E-02
       66.  0.10061933E-02
       67.  0.10061859E-02
       68.  0.10061784E-02


Station 59
  Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 56 to 68) to match water 
  sample data and CTD traces.
  new slope:  0.100635e-2


Stations 69 to 75
  number of data points read in:     79
STATIONS    69.   75.  PRES. BOUNDS    1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
 Applied cond. bias: -0.0016
 PASS No. =           4
     St.#,  P,    T,     C,     COEFF.            GOOD
   1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.10062813E-02   0.127E+06
  N=     76 AVE=    0.14307E-05 STD. DEV.=    0.21687E-02



LEG 4  CTD10
       EASTER ISLAND TO NEW ZEALAND   
       STATIONS 75 TO 188 (EXCEPT 76 TO 85, 112, 141, AND 187)


Stations 87 to 101           Use fit of stations 86 to 101
  number of data points read in:    259
STATIONS    86.  101.  PRES. BOUNDS    1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
 Applied cond. bias: -0.0016
 PASS No. =           7
     St.#,  P,    T,     C,     COEFF.            GOOD
   1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.10070056E-02   0.143E+05
   2  1.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   -.79787251E-08    10.6    
  N=    243 AVE=    0.13312E-05 STD. DEV.=    0.17053E-02
   STATION     COND. SLOPE
       86.  0.10063194E-02
       87.  0.10063114E-02
       88.  0.10063035E-02
       89.  0.10062955E-02
       90.  0.10062875E-02
       91.  0.10062795E-02
       92.  0.10062715E-02
       93.  0.10062636E-02
       94.  0.10062556E-02
       95.  0.10062476E-02
       96.  0.10062396E-02
       97.  0.10062317E-02
       98.  0.10062237E-02
       99.  0.10062157E-02
      100.  0.10062077E-02
      101.  0.10061997E-02


Station 86
  Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 86 to 101) to match water 
  sample data and CTD traces.
  new slope:  0.100640e-2


Stations 103 to 120        Use fit of stations 102 to 120
  number of data points read in:    324
STATIONS   102.  120.  PRES. BOUNDS    1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
 Applied cond. bias: -0.0016
 PASS No. =           9
      St.#,  P,    T,     C,     COEFF.            GOOD
   1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.10063121E-02   0.325E+06
  N=    287 AVE=    0.93993E-06 STD. DEV.=    0.16520E-02


Station 102
  Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 102 to 120) to match water 
  sample data and CTD traces.
  new slope:  0.100626e-2


Stations 121      Use fit of stations 121 to 122
  number of data points read in:     43
STATIONS   121.  122.  PRES. BOUNDS    1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
 Applied cond. bias: -0.0016
 PASS No. =           5
     St.#,  P,    T,     C,     COEFF.            GOOD
   1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.10062360E-02   0.730E+05
  N=     39 AVE=   -0.14327E-05 STD. DEV.=    0.27091E-02


Station 122
  Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 121 to 122) to match water 
  sample data and CTD traces.
  new slope:  0.100634e-2


Stations 123 to 136
  number of data points read in:    293
STATIONS   123.  136.  PRES. BOUNDS    1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
 Applied cond. bias: -0.0016
 PASS No. =           8
     St.#,  P,    T,     C,     COEFF.            GOOD
   1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.10063488E-02   0.688E+06
  N=    263 AVE=    0.56917E-06 STD. DEV.=    0.74673E-03


Stations 138 to 175          Use fit of stations 137 to 175
  number of data points read in:    880
STATIONS   137.  175.  PRES. BOUNDS    1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
 Applied cond. bias: -0.0016
 PASS No. =           8
     St.#,  P,    T,     C,     COEFF.            GOOD
   1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.10064198E-02   0.115E+07
  N=    803 AVE=    0.70922E-07 STD. DEV.=    0.78187E-03


Station 137
  Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 137 to 175) to match water 
  sample data and CTD traces.
  new slope:  0.100635e-2


Stations 176 to 188
  number of data points read in:    219
STATIONS   176.  188.  PRES. BOUNDS    1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
 Applied cond. bias: -0.0016
 PASS No. =           7
     St.#,  P,    T,     C,     COEFF.            GOOD
   1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.10061674E-02   0.107E+05
   2  1.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.15838572E-08    3.05    
  N=    200 AVE=    0.18406E-05 STD. DEV.=    0.88455E-03
   STATION     COND. SLOPE
      176.  0.10064462E-02
      177.  0.10064477E-02
      178.  0.10064493E-02
      179.  0.10064509E-02
      180.  0.10064525E-02
      181.  0.10064541E-02
      182.  0.10064557E-02
      183.  0.10064573E-02
      184.  0.10064588E-02
      185.  0.10064604E-02
      186.  0.10064620E-02
      187.  0.10064636E-02
      188.  0.10064652E-02



LEG 5  CTD10 
       NEW ZEALAND TO AUSTRALIA
       STATIONS 190 TO 246


Stations 190 to 200
  number of data points read in:    165
STATIONS   190.  200.  PRES. BOUNDS    1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
 Applied cond. bias: -0.0016
 PASS No. =           4
     St.#,  P,    T,     C,     COEFF.            GOOD
   1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.10084371E-02   0.426E+04
   2  1.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   -.10094641E-07    8.26    
  N=    156 AVE=    0.14242E-05 STD. DEV.=    0.14036E-02
   STATION     COND. SLOPE
      190.  0.10065191E-02
      191.  0.10065090E-02
      192.  0.10064989E-02
      193.  0.10064888E-02
      194.  0.10064787E-02
      195.  0.10064686E-02
      196.  0.10064585E-02
      197.  0.10064484E-02
      198.  0.10064383E-02
      199.  0.10064282E-02
      200.  0.10064181E-02


Stations 201 to 219
  number of data points read in:    163
STATIONS   201.  219.  PRES. BOUNDS    1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
 Applied cond. bias: -0.0016
 PASS No. =           5
     St.#,  P,    T,     C,     COEFF.            GOOD
   1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.10064438E-02   0.306E+06
  N=    152 AVE=    0.79471E-05 STD. DEV.=    0.12917E-02


Station 220 to 246
  number of data points read in:    299
STATIONS   220.  244.  PRES. BOUNDS    1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
 Applied cond. bias: -0.0016
 PASS No. =           8
     St.#,  P,    T,     C,     COEFF.            GOOD
   1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.10064778E-02   0.447E+06
  N=    271 AVE=    0.50069E-05 STD. DEV.=    0.11725E-02





********************************************************************
CTD9  CTD9  CTD9  CTD9  CTD9  CTD9  CTD9  CTD9  CTD9  CTD9  CTD9
********************************************************************

LEG3  CTD9
      CHILE TO EASTER ISLAND
      NO STATIONS

LEG4  CTD9
      EASTER ISLAND TO NEW ZEALAND
      STATIONS 76 TO 85


Stations 76,78 to 85         Use fit of stations 76 to 85
  number of data points read in:    162
STATIONS    76.   85.  PRES. BOUNDS    1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
 Applied cond. bias: -0.0180
 PASS No. =           5
     St.#,  P,    T,     C,     COEFF.            GOOD
   1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.99750453E-03   0.104E+05
   2  1.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.75034637E-08    6.34    
  N=    148 AVE=   -0.15751E-05 STD. DEV.=    0.13061E-02
   STATION     COND. SLOPE
       76.  0.99807480E-03
       77.  0.99808230E-03
       78.  0.99808980E-03
       79.  0.99809731E-03
       80.  0.99810481E-03
       81.  0.99811231E-03
       82.  0.99811982E-03
       83.  0.99812732E-03
       84.  0.99813482E-03
       85.  0.99814233E-03


Station 77
  Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 76 to 85) to match water 
  sample data and CTD traces.
  new slope:  0.998002e-3


LEG 5  CTD9
       NEW ZEALAND TO AUSTRALIA
       STATIONS 248 TO 267


Stations 249 to 257          Use fit of stations 248 to 257
  number of data points read in:     35
STATIONS   248.  255.  PRES. BOUNDS    1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
 Applied cond. bias: -0.0180
 PASS No. =           5
     St.#,  P,    T,     C,     COEFF.            GOOD
   1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.99814130E-03   0.163E+06
  N=     30 AVE=    0.17127E-05 STD. DEV.=    0.10655E-02


Station 248
  Manually adjusted slope from above fit (Stations 248 to 257) to match water 
  sample data and CTD traces.
  new slope:  0.998101e-3


Stations 258 to 267
  number of data points read in:     34
STATIONS   258.  265.  PRES. BOUNDS    1100.0  6500.0 edit=  2.8
 Applied cond. bias: -0.0180
 PASS No. =           4
     St.#,  P,    T,     C,     COEFF.            GOOD
   1  0.00  0.00  0.00  1.00   0.99818393E-03   0.921E+05
  N=     31 AVE=   -0.89016E-06 STD. DEV.=    0.19239E-02





************************************************************************

TABLE: Conductivity bias and slope versus station number used to reduce
       the P06 CTD data.

                  sta      bias         slope
                  ---  ------------  ------------
                    4  -.162216E-02  0.100626E-02
                    5  -.162216E-02  0.100626E-02
                    6  -.162216E-02  0.100624E-02
                    7  -.162216E-02  0.100624E-02
                    8  -.162216E-02  0.100624E-02
                    9  -.162216E-02  0.100626E-02
                   10  -.162216E-02  0.100625E-02
                   11  -.162216E-02  0.100625E-02
                   12  -.162216E-02  0.100625E-02
                   13  -.162216E-02  0.100625E-02
                   14  -.162216E-02  0.100625E-02
                   15  -.162216E-02  0.100624E-02
                   16  -.162216E-02  0.100624E-02
                   17  -.162216E-02  0.100624E-02
                   18  -.162216E-02  0.100624E-02
                   19  -.162216E-02  0.100624E-02
                   20  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
                   21  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
                   22  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02
                   23  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02
                   24  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02
                   25  -.162216E-02  0.100627E-02
                   26  -.162216E-02  0.100627E-02
                   27  -.162216E-02  0.100627E-02
                   28  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02
                   29  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02
                   30  -.162216E-02  0.100624E-02
                   31  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02
                   32  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02
                   33  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02
                   34  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02
                   35  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02
                   36  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02
                   37  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02
                   38  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02
                   39  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02
                   40  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02
                   41  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
                   42  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
                   43  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
                   44  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
                   45  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
                   46  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
                   47  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02

                  sta      bias         slope
                  ---  ------------  ------------
                   48  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
                   49  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
                   50  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
                   51  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
                   52  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
                   53  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
                   54  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
                   55  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
                   56  -.162216E-02  0.100627E-02
                   57  -.162216E-02  0.100626E-02
                   58  -.162216E-02  0.100625E-02
                   59  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02
                   60  -.162216E-02  0.100624E-02
                   61  -.162216E-02  0.100623E-02
                   62  -.162216E-02  0.100622E-02
                   63  -.162216E-02  0.100622E-02
                   64  -.162216E-02  0.100621E-02
                   65  -.162216E-02  0.100620E-02
                   66  -.162216E-02  0.100619E-02
                   67  -.162216E-02  0.100619E-02
                   68  -.162216E-02  0.100618E-02
                   69  -.162216E-02  0.100628E-02
                   70  -.162216E-02  0.100628E-02
                   71  -.162216E-02  0.100628E-02
                   72  -.162216E-02  0.100628E-02
                   75  -.162216E-02  0.100628E-02
                   76  -.179552E-01  0.998075E-03
                   77  -.179552E-01  0.998002E-03
                   78  -.179552E-01  0.998090E-03
                   79  -.179552E-01  0.998097E-03
                   80  -.179552E-01  0.998105E-03
                   81  -.179552E-01  0.998112E-03
                   82  -.179552E-01  0.998120E-03
                   83  -.179552E-01  0.998127E-03
                   84  -.179552E-01  0.998135E-03
                   85  -.179552E-01  0.998142E-03
                   86  -.162216E-02  0.100640E-02
                   87  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
                   88  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02

                  sta      bias         slope
                  ---  ------------  ------------
                   89  -.162216E-02  0.100630E-02
                   90  -.162216E-02  0.100629E-02
                   91  -.162216E-02  0.100628E-02
                   92  -.162216E-02  0.100627E-02
                   93  -.162216E-02  0.100626E-02
                   94  -.162216E-02  0.100626E-02
                   95  -.162216E-02  0.100625E-02
                   96  -.162216E-02  0.100624E-02
                   97  -.162216E-02  0.100623E-02
                   98  -.162216E-02  0.100622E-02
                   99  -.162216E-02  0.100622E-02
                  100  -.162216E-02  0.100621E-02
                  101  -.162216E-02  0.100620E-02
                  102  -.162216E-02  0.100626E-02
                  103  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
                  104  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
                  105  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
                  106  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
                  107  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
                  108  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
                  109  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
                  110  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
                  111  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
                  113  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
                  114  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
                  115  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
                  116  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
                  117  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
                  118  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
                  119  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
                  120  -.162216E-02  0.100631E-02
                  121  -.162216E-02  0.100626E-02
                  122  -.162216E-02  0.100634E-02
                  123  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02
                  124  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02
                  125  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02
                  126  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02
                  127  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02
                  128  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02

                  sta      bias         slope
                  ---  ------------  ------------
                  129  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02
                  130  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02
                  131  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02
                  132  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02
                  133  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02
                  134  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02
                  135  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02
                  136  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02
                  137  -.162216E-02  0.100635E-02
                  138  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  139  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  140  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  142  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  143  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  144  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  145  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  146  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  147  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  148  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  149  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  150  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  151  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  152  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  153  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  154  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  155  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  156  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  157  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  158  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  159  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  160  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  161  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  162  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  163  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  164  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  165  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  166  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  167  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  168  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02

                  sta      bias         slope
                  ---  ------------  ------------
                  169  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  170  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  171  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  172  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  173  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  174  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  175  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  176  -.162216E-02  0.100645E-02
                  177  -.162216E-02  0.100645E-02
                  178  -.162216E-02  0.100645E-02
                  179  -.162216E-02  0.100645E-02
                  180  -.162216E-02  0.100645E-02
                  181  -.162216E-02  0.100645E-02
                  182  -.162216E-02  0.100646E-02
                  183  -.162216E-02  0.100646E-02
                  184  -.162216E-02  0.100646E-02
                  185  -.162216E-02  0.100646E-02
                  186  -.162216E-02  0.100646E-02
                  188  -.162216E-02  0.100647E-02
                  190  -.162216E-02  0.100652E-02
                  191  -.162216E-02  0.100651E-02
                  192  -.162216E-02  0.100650E-02
                  193  -.162216E-02  0.100649E-02
                  194  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
                  195  -.162216E-02  0.100647E-02
                  196  -.162216E-02  0.100646E-02
                  197  -.162216E-02  0.100645E-02
                  198  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
                  199  -.162216E-02  0.100643E-02
                  200  -.162216E-02  0.100642E-02
                  201  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
                  202  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
                  203  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
                  204  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
                  205  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
                  206  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
                  207  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
                  208  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
                  209  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02

                  sta      bias         slope
                  ---  ------------  ------------
                  210  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
                  211  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
                  212  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
                  213  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
                  214  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
                  215  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
                  216  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
                  217  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
                  218  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
                  219  -.162216E-02  0.100644E-02
                  220  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
                  221  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
                  222  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
                  223  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
                  224  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
                  225  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
                  226  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
                  227  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
                  228  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
                  229  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
                  230  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
                  231  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
                  232  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
                  233  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
                  234  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
                  235  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
                  236  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
                  237  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
                  238  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
                  239  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
                  240  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
                  241  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
                  242  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
                  243  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
                  244  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
                  245  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
                  246  -.162216E-02  0.100648E-02
                  248  -.179552E-01  0.998101E-03
                  249  -.179552E-01  0.998141E-03

                  sta      bias         slope
                  ---  ------------  ------------
                  250  -.179552E-01  0.998141E-03
                  251  -.179552E-01  0.998141E-03
                  252  -.179552E-01  0.998141E-03
                  253  -.179552E-01  0.998141E-03
                  254  -.179552E-01  0.998141E-03
                  255  -.179552E-01  0.998141E-03
                  256  -.179552E-01  0.998141E-03
                  257  -.179552E-01  0.998141E-03
                  258  -.179552E-01  0.998184E-03
                  259  -.179552E-01  0.998184E-03
                  260  -.179552E-01  0.998184E-03
                  261  -.179552E-01  0.998184E-03
                  262  -.179552E-01  0.998184E-03
                  263  -.179552E-01  0.998184E-03
                  264  -.179552E-01  0.998184E-03
                  265  -.179552E-01  0.998184E-03
                  266  -.179552E-01  0.998184E-03
                  267  -.179552E-01  0.998184E-03





@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

                            OXYGEN

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

Leg 3, stations 4 to 72, ctd10 was using an oxygen pump.  As noted
above, the oxygen pump caused some problems with the observations. 
Affects of using oxygen pump:

  • Top 1000m oxygen current very noisy, very difficult to fit.
  • Bottoms of stations do not show the typical oxygen "foot" due
    to slowing of the package.

As well there were the usual difficulties processing data from this
sensor.  The following details the derivations of the various shaping
parameters for CTD oxygen.  See Owens and Millard (1985) for details to
the algorithm.


*********************************************************************
CTD10     CTD10    CTD10    CTD10    CTD10    CTD10    CTD10    CTD10
*********************************************************************


LEG 3 
  CHILE TO EASTER ISLAND 
  STATIONS 4-72

Leg three had an oxygen water pump attached to CTD 10. The data was
noisy, especially at the surface. More serious, fits to the water
sample data using data over the full water column were left with
significant depth dependence in the oxygen - water sample residuals.  
The pressure dependence in the fit was removed from the final data by
fitting the top and bottom water separately.  All stations have one
calibration for the top 1000 db and a second calibration for the data
below 1000 db EXCEPT for stations 4,5,70,72-75.  Stations 4 and 5 do
not have data below 1000 db and stations 70, and 72-75 fit well with
one calibration for the entire depth. Stations 72-75 and perhaps 70 did
not use the oxygen pump.  Operationally a full water column fit was
performed and the derived parameters applied to the top 1000 m of the
water column to obtain one estimate of the oxygen profile.  Next a fit
was done only to the data below 1000 db, and these parameters used to
derive a second oxygen profile estimate.  The reported profile is a
blend of these with a linear overlap region within 100 db vertically of
1000 db.


FIT STATISTICS:

Station 4
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   1 Min/Max Sta:   4.-   4.  1 StdDev:  0.1600E+00 #Obs:   10  dOx: 0.448
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.073 0.1428E-02 -.6485E-02  -0.0324   0.75   8.00   0.0000E+00


Station 5               Use fit of stations 4 and 5
 Edit Fact=  2.00 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   2 Min/Max Sta:   4.-   5.  1 StdDev:  0.2461E+00 #Obs:   22  dOx: 0.492
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.154 0.1230E-02 0.3078E-03  -0.0319   0.75   8.00   0.0000E+00


SHALLOW    Stations 6 to 11
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   7 Min/Max Sta:   6.-  11.  1 StdDev:  0.1015E+00 #Obs:  122  dOx: 0.254
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.007 0.1089E-02 0.1761E-03  -0.0234   0.75   8.00   0.0000E+00


DEEP    Stations 6 to 11
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   3 Min/Max Sta:   6.-  11.  1 StdDev:  0.2525E-01 #Obs:   49  dOx: 0.071
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.026 0.1245E-02 0.1487E-03  -0.0473   0.75   8.00   0.1721E-02
Station No. =     6  Bais = -.0157
Station No. =     7  Bais = -.0139
Station No. =     8  Bais = -.0122
Station No. =     9  Bais = -.0105
Station No. =    10  Bais = -.0088
Station No. =    11  Bais = -.0071


Station 6
Manually adjusted bias of calculated oxygen in CTD and SEA file by -.04
ml/l oxygen, to match water samlple data and CTD traces.


SHALLOW    Stations 12 to 21
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
  13 Min/Max Sta:  12.-  21.  1 StdDev:  0.4677E-01 #Obs:  217  dOx: 0.117
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.019 0.1058E-02 0.1596E-03  -0.0222   0.95   3.80   0.0000E+00


DEEP    Staions 12 to 21
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   4 Min/Max Sta:  12.-  21.  1 StdDev:  0.2461E-01 #Obs:  144  dOx: 0.069
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.018 0.1156E-02 0.1424E-03  -0.0412   0.95   4.00   0.0000E+00


SHALLOW    Stations 22 to 25
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
  16 Min/Max Sta:  22.-  25.  1 StdDev:  0.4481E-01 #Obs:   87  dOx: 0.112
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.036 0.9957E-03 0.1607E-03  -0.0197   0.95   3.70   0.0000E+00


DEEP    Stations 22 to 25
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   7 Min/Max Sta:  22.-  25.  1 StdDev:  0.1040E-01 #Obs:   46  dOx: 0.029
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.012 0.1204E-02 0.1404E-03  -0.0467   0.95   4.00   0.0000E+00


SHALLOW     Stations 26 to 32
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   9 Min/Max Sta:  26.-  32.  1 StdDev:  0.6487E-01 #Obs:  187  dOx: 0.162
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.027 0.1048E-02 0.1573E-03  -0.0251   0.75   8.00   0.0000E+00


DEEP    Stations 26 to 32
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   5 Min/Max Sta:  26.-  32.  1 StdDev:  0.2109E-01 #Obs:   98  dOx: 0.059
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.015 0.1241E-02 0.1324E-03  -0.0557   0.75   8.00   0.0000E+00


SHALLOW    Stations 33 to 38
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   7 Min/Max Sta:  33.-  38.  1 StdDev:  0.5781E-01 #Obs:  165  dOx: 0.145
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.029 0.1032E-02 0.1603E-03  -0.0219   0.75   8.00   0.0000E+00


DEEP    Stations 33 to 38
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
  10 Min/Max Sta:  33.-  38.  1 StdDev:  0.1144E-01 #Obs:   80  dOx: 0.029
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.005 0.1241E-02 0.1384E-03  -0.0494   0.75   8.00   0.0000E+00


SHALLOW    Stations 39 to 42
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
  11 Min/Max Sta:  39.-  42.  1 StdDev:  0.6401E-01 #Obs:  110  dOx: 0.160
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.044 0.1001E-02 0.1490E-03  -0.0207   0.95   6.40   0.0000E+00


DEEP     Stations 39 to 42
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   4 Min/Max Sta:  39.-  42.  1 StdDev:  0.2435E-01 #Obs:   60  dOx: 0.068
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.016 0.1206E-02 0.1328E-03  -0.0475   0.95   6.50   0.0000E+00


SHALLOW    Stations 43 to 45
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   9 Min/Max Sta:  43.-  45.  1 StdDev:  0.4373E-01 #Obs:   82  dOx: 0.109
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.036 0.1017E-02 0.1543E-03  -0.0202   0.95   4.40   0.0000E+00


DEEP    Stations 43 to 45
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   4 Min/Max Sta:  43.-  45.  1 StdDev:  0.1951E-01 #Obs:   42  dOx: 0.049
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.015 0.1205E-02 0.1337E-03  -0.0443   0.95   4.50   0.0000E+00


SHALLOW    Stations 46 to 56        Use fit of stations 46 to 57
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
  10 Min/Max Sta:  46.-  57.  1 StdDev:  0.5963E-01 #Obs:  343  dOx: 0.149
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.036 0.1024E-02 0.1534E-03  -0.0228   0.75   8.00   0.0000E+00


SHALLOW Station 57 
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   5 Min/Max Sta:  57.-  57.  1 StdDev:  0.3000E-01 #Obs:   32  dOx: 0.084
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.016 0.1072E-02 0.1612E-03  -0.0247   1.00   8.56   0.0000E+00


DEEP    Stations 46 to 57
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   9 Min/Max Sta:  46.-  57.  1 StdDev:  0.1570E-01 #Obs:  176  dOx: 0.044
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.008 0.1206E-02 0.1418E-03  -0.0446   0.75   8.00   0.0000E+00


SHALLOW    Stations 58 to 61
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
  10 Min/Max Sta:  58.-  61.  1 StdDev:  0.4268E-01 #Obs:  111  dOx: 0.107
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.029 0.1045E-02 0.1551E-03  -0.0234   0.95  11.60   0.0000E+00


DEEP    Stations 58 to 61
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   3 Min/Max Sta:  58.-  61.  1 StdDev:  0.1469E-01 #Obs:   63  dOx: 0.041
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.004 0.1219E-02 0.1454E-03  -0.0394   0.95  11.60   0.0000E+00


SHALLOW    Stations 62,64 to 68
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
  11 Min/Max Sta:  62.-  68.  1 StdDev:  0.3513E-01 #Obs:  171  dOx: 0.088
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.043 0.1044E-02 0.1411E-03  -0.0236   0.95   5.60   0.0000E+00


DEEP     Stations 62 to 68 (63 included)
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   3 Min/Max Sta:  62.-  68.  1 StdDev:  0.1604E-01 #Obs:  103  dOx: 0.045
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.021 0.1251E-02 0.1544E-03  -0.0399   0.95   6.00   0.0000E+00


SHALLOW    Station 63
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   5 Min/Max Sta:  63.-  63.  1 StdDev:  0.5965E-01 #Obs:   29  dOx: 0.149
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.043 0.1057E-02 0.1420E-03  -0.0241   0.95   7.50   0.0000E+00


DEEP     Station 62 to 68 (Station 63 included)
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   3 Min/Max Sta:  62.-  68.  1 StdDev:  0.1604E-01 #Obs:  103  dOx: 0.045
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.021 0.1251E-02 0.1544E-03  -0.0399   0.95   6.00   0.0000E+00


SHALLOW    Stations 69 and 71
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   5 Min/Max Sta:  69.-  71.  1 StdDev:  0.4604E-01 #Obs:   62  dOx: 0.115
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.032 0.1058E-02 0.1494E-03  -0.0244   0.95   9.00   0.0000E+00


DEEP    Stations 69 to 71
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   3 Min/Max Sta:  69.-  71.  1 StdDev:  0.1487E-01 #Obs:   30  dOx: 0.037
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.034 0.1301E-02 0.1543E-03  -0.0446   0.95   9.00   0.0000E+00


Station 70
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   3 Min/Max Sta:  70.-  70.  1 StdDev:  0.1582E-01 #Obs:   33  dOx: 0.040
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.018 0.1114E-02 0.1572E-03  -0.0265   0.75   8.00   0.0000E+00


Stations 72 to 75
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   9 Min/Max Sta:  72.-  75.  1 StdDev:  0.2478E-01 #Obs:   54  dOx: 0.062
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.043 0.1032E-02 0.1469E-03  -0.0226   0.95   9.00   0.0000E+00





LEG 4
  EASTER ISLAND TO NEW ZEALAND 
  STATIONS 75 TO 188 (EXCEPT 76 TO 85, 112, 141, AND 187)

MISSING STATION 110 (files not present)

Station 86 to 92
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   7 Min/Max Sta:  86.-  92.  1 StdDev:  0.3403E-01 #Obs:  225  dOx: 0.095
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.003 0.1109E-02 0.1495E-03  -0.0267   0.77  10.54   0.2013E-03
Station No. =    86  Bais = 0.0207
Station No. =    87  Bais = 0.0209
Station No. =    88  Bais = 0.0211
Station No. =    89  Bais = 0.0213
Station No. =    90  Bais = 0.0215
Station No. =    91  Bais = 0.0217
Station No. =    92  Bais = 0.0219


Station 93 to 97
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   8 Min/Max Sta:  93.-  97.  1 StdDev:  0.3510E-01 #Obs:  157  dOx: 0.088
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.085 0.1102E-02 0.1484E-03  -0.0272   0.70  10.05   -.6505E-03
Station No. =    93  Bais = 0.0242
Station No. =    94  Bais = 0.0236
Station No. =    95  Bais = 0.0229
Station No. =    96  Bais = 0.0223
Station No. =    97  Bais = 0.0216


Station 93 to 103
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
  17 Min/Max Sta:  98.- 103.  1 StdDev:  0.2703E-01 #Obs:  173  dOx: 0.076
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.009 0.1083E-02 0.1426E-03  -0.0271   0.63   4.90   0.2407E-03
Station No. =    98  Bais = 0.0326
Station No. =    99  Bais = 0.0328
Station No. =   100  Bais = 0.0330
Station No. =   101  Bais = 0.0333
Station No. =   102  Bais = 0.0335
Station No. =   103  Bais = 0.0338


Station 104 to 106
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   7 Min/Max Sta: 104.- 106.  1 StdDev:  0.2727E-01 #Obs:   93  dOx: 0.076
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.019 0.1115E-02 0.1486E-03  -0.0279   0.70   8.01   0.3648E-03
Station No. =   104  Bais = 0.0189
Station No. =   105  Bais = 0.0193
Station No. =   106  Bais = 0.0196


Station 107 to 109
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   6 Min/Max Sta: 107.- 109.  1 StdDev:  0.2736E-01 #Obs:   93  dOx: 0.077
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.004 0.1112E-02 0.1457E-03  -0.0274   0.70   8.00   0.2605E-03
Station No. =   107  Bais = 0.0243
Station No. =   108  Bais = 0.0245
Station No. =   109  Bais = 0.0248


Station 110, 111        Use fit of Station 111
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   5 Min/Max Sta: 111.- 111.  1 StdDev:  0.4520E-01 #Obs:   26  dOx: 0.127
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.034 0.1071E-02 0.1452E-03  -0.0260   0.75   8.00   0.0000E+00


Station 113, 114        Use fit of stations 111,113,114
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   8 Min/Max Sta: 111.- 114.  1 StdDev:  0.4247E-01 #Obs:   85  dOx: 0.119
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.012 0.1087E-02 0.1402E-03  -0.0264   0.70   7.50   0.2076E-03
Station No. =   111  Bais = 0.0351
Station No. =   112  Bais = 0.0353
Station No. =   113  Bais = 0.0355
Station No. =   114  Bais = 0.0357


Station 115, 117 to 119
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   9 Min/Max Sta: 115.- 119.  1 StdDev:  0.2686E-01 #Obs:  123  dOx: 0.075
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.056 0.1080E-02 0.1421E-03  -0.0260   0.70   7.48   -.1708E-03
Station No. =   115  Bais = 0.0366
Station No. =   116  Bais = 0.0364
Station No. =   117  Bais = 0.0362
Station No. =   118  Bais = 0.0361
Station No. =   119  Bais = 0.0359


Station 116
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   5 Min/Max Sta: 116.- 116.  1 StdDev:  0.2690E-01 #Obs:   30  dOx: 0.075
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.012 0.1139E-02 0.1486E-03  -0.0301   0.70   7.00   0.0000E+00


Station 120 to 123        Use fit of stations 120 to 124
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
  10 Min/Max Sta: 120.- 124.  1 StdDev:  0.2269E-01 #Obs:  138  dOx: 0.057
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.029 0.1116E-02 0.1465E-03  -0.0273   0.68   7.00   -.6418E-04
Station No. =   120  Bais = 0.0213
Station No. =   121  Bais = 0.0212
Station No. =   122  Bais = 0.0211
Station No. =   123  Bais = 0.0211
Station No. =   124  Bais = 0.0210


Station 124
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   3 Min/Max Sta: 124.- 124.  1 StdDev:  0.1921E-01 #Obs:   34  dOx: 0.054
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.017 0.1117E-02 0.1510E-03  -0.0272   0.64   6.86   0.0000E+00


Station 125 to 126
 Edit Fact=  2.30 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
  16 Min/Max Sta: 125.- 126.  1 StdDev:  0.2032E-01 #Obs:   40  dOx: 0.047
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.007 0.1167E-02 0.1500E-03  -0.0288   0.78   8.00   0.0000E+00


Station 127 to 130
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   5 Min/Max Sta: 127.- 130.  1 StdDev:  0.2907E-01 #Obs:  131  dOx: 0.081
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.006 0.1154E-02 0.1501E-03  -0.0287   0.75   8.00   0.1250E-03
Station No. =   127  Bais = 0.0094
Station No. =   128  Bais = 0.0095
Station No. =   129  Bais = 0.0097
Station No. =   130  Bais = 0.0098


Station 131 to 135
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   7 Min/Max Sta: 131.- 135.  1 StdDev:  0.2351E-01 #Obs:  146  dOx: 0.059
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.007 0.1161E-02 0.1497E-03  -0.0288   0.76   8.00   0.1174E-03
Station No. =   131  Bais = 0.0083
Station No. =   132  Bais = 0.0084
Station No. =   133  Bais = 0.0085
Station No. =   134  Bais = 0.0086
Station No. =   135  Bais = 0.0088


Station 136
 Edit Fact=  2.00 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    4000.00000000
   8 Min/Max Sta: 136.- 136.  1 StdDev:  0.1063E-01 #Obs:   30  dOx: 0.021
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.003 0.1180E-02 0.1518E-03  -0.0299   0.64   8.00   0.0000E+00


Station 137 to 140, 142 to 144
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   6 Min/Max Sta: 137.- 144.  1 StdDev:  0.3574E-01 #Obs:  215  dOx: 0.100
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.000 0.1189E-02 0.1487E-03  -0.0299   0.81   8.68   0.1720E-04
Station No. =   137  Bais = 0.0028
Station No. =   138  Bais = 0.0028
Station No. =   139  Bais = 0.0028
Station No. =   140  Bais = 0.0028
Station No. =   141  Bais = 0.0029
Station No. =   142  Bais = 0.0029
Station No. =   143  Bais = 0.0029
Station No. =   144  Bais = 0.0029


Station 145 to 150
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   5 Min/Max Sta: 145.- 150.  1 StdDev:  0.3730E-01 #Obs:  225  dOx: 0.093
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.010 0.1172E-02 0.1470E-03  -0.0307   0.75   8.00   0.0000E+00


Station 151 to 155
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   8 Min/Max Sta: 151.- 155.  1 StdDev:  0.2762E-01 #Obs:  147  dOx: 0.077
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.001 0.1189E-02 0.1469E-03  -0.0297   0.79  15.15   0.4069E-04
Station No. =   151  Bais = 0.0075
Station No. =   152  Bais = 0.0076
Station No. =   153  Bais = 0.0076
Station No. =   154  Bais = 0.0077
Station No. =   155  Bais = 0.0077


Station 156 
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   4 Min/Max Sta: 156.- 156.  1 StdDev:  0.2703E-01 #Obs:   30  dOx: 0.076
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.007 0.1195E-02 0.1458E-03  -0.0309   0.72  23.15   0.0000E+00


Station 157 to 159
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   6 Min/Max Sta: 157.- 159.  1 StdDev:  0.2792E-01 #Obs:   85  dOx: 0.070
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.004 0.1207E-02 0.1467E-03  -0.0305   0.80  15.35   0.0000E+00


Station 160 to 162
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   7 Min/Max Sta: 160.- 162.  1 StdDev:  0.3854E-01 #Obs:  105  dOx: 0.096
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.014 0.1183E-02 0.1445E-03  -0.0299   0.81   9.09   0.0000E+00


Station 163
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   4 Min/Max Sta: 163.- 163.  1 StdDev:  0.1831E-01 #Obs:   29  dOx: 0.046
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.002 0.1224E-02 0.1471E-03  -0.0325   0.70   9.00   0.0000E+00


Station 164 to 167
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   7 Min/Max Sta: 164.- 167.  1 StdDev:  0.3208E-01 #Obs:  114  dOx: 0.090
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.031 0.1161E-02 0.1458E-03  -0.0290   0.74   4.68   -.9247E-04
Station No. =   164  Bais = 0.0155
Station No. =   165  Bais = 0.0154
Station No. =   166  Bais = 0.0153
Station No. =   167  Bais = 0.0152


Stations 168 to 170
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   5 Min/Max Sta: 168.- 170.  1 StdDev:  0.3139E-01 #Obs:   93  dOx: 0.088
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.003 0.1194E-02 0.1469E-03  -0.0303   0.82   3.00   0.4917E-04
Station No. =   168  Bais = 0.0057
Station No. =   169  Bais = 0.0058
Station No. =   170  Bais = 0.0058


Stations 171 to 174
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
  18 Min/Max Sta: 171.- 174.  1 StdDev:  0.2560E-01 #Obs:   90  dOx: 0.072
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.001 0.1270E-02 0.1453E-03  -0.0393   0.90   3.00   -.4661E-04
Station No. =   171  Bais = -.0091
Station No. =   172  Bais = -.0092
Station No. =   173  Bais = -.0092
Station No. =   174  Bais = -.0093


Stations 175 to 178
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   8 Min/Max Sta: 175.- 178.  1 StdDev:  0.6433E-01 #Obs:  127  dOx: 0.180
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.016 0.1175E-02 0.1447E-03  -0.0296   0.90   3.00   0.0000E+00


Station 179 to 182
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   5 Min/Max Sta: 179.- 182.  1 StdDev:  0.6177E-01 #Obs:  119  dOx: 0.173
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.016 0.1085E-02 0.1546E-03  -0.0244   0.84   3.00   0.5458E-04
Station No. =   179  Bais = 0.0258
Station No. =   180  Bais = 0.0259
Station No. =   181  Bais = 0.0260
Station No. =   182  Bais = 0.0260


Stations 183 to 184
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   4 Min/Max Sta: 183.- 184.  1 StdDev:  0.3034E-01 #Obs:   52  dOx: 0.085
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.040 0.1083E-02 0.1346E-03  -0.0249   0.95   8.00   0.0000E+00


Stations 185 to 188
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   9 Min/Max Sta: 185.- 188.  1 StdDev:  0.3887E-01 #Obs:   81  dOx: 0.097
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.112 0.1136E-02 0.1480E-03  -0.0269   0.87   8.00   -.5249E-03
Station No. =   185  Bais = 0.0150
Station No. =   186  Bais = 0.0145
Station No. =   187  Bais = 0.0140
Station No. =   188  Bais = 0.0135



LEG 5  CTD 10
       NEW ZEALAND TO AUSTRALIA 
       STATIONS 190 TO 246


Station 190 to 194
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   7 Min/Max Sta: 190.- 194.  1 StdDev:  0.2064E-01 #Obs:  152  dOx: 0.058
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.005 0.1071E-02 0.1290E-03  -0.0261   0.72   1.20   0.2826E-03
Station No. =   190  Bais = 0.0486
Station No. =   191  Bais = 0.0489
Station No. =   192  Bais = 0.0492
Station No. =   193  Bais = 0.0495
Station No. =   194  Bais = 0.0498


Stations 195 to 201    Use fit of stations 190 to 201
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   9 Min/Max Sta: 190.- 201.  1 StdDev:  0.2944E-01 #Obs:  317  dOx: 0.082
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.002 0.1100E-02 0.1347E-03  -0.0273   0.75   5.10   0.1808E-03
Station No. =   190  Bais = 0.0361
Station No. =   191  Bais = 0.0363
Station No. =   192  Bais = 0.0365
Station No. =   193  Bais = 0.0367
Station No. =   194  Bais = 0.0368
Station No. =   195  Bais = 0.0370
Station No. =   196  Bais = 0.0372
Station No. =   197  Bais = 0.0374
Station No. =   198  Bais = 0.0376
Station No. =   199  Bais = 0.0377
Station No. =   200  Bais = 0.0379
Station No. =   201  Bais = 0.0381


Stations 202 to 211
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   4 Min/Max Sta: 202.- 211.  1 StdDev:  0.3065E-01 #Obs:  189  dOx: 0.086
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.026 0.1063E-02 0.1307E-03  -0.0253   0.73   5.10   0.1343E-03
Station No. =   202  Bais = 0.0531
Station No. =   203  Bais = 0.0532
Station No. =   204  Bais = 0.0533
Station No. =   205  Bais = 0.0535
Station No. =   206  Bais = 0.0536
Station No. =   207  Bais = 0.0537
Station No. =   208  Bais = 0.0539
Station No. =   209  Bais = 0.0540
Station No. =   210  Bais = 0.0541
Station No. =   211  Bais = 0.0543


Station 212 to 221
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   6 Min/Max Sta: 212.- 221.  1 StdDev:  0.2997E-01 #Obs:  198  dOx: 0.084
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.012 0.1076E-02 0.1388E-03  -0.0256   0.74   8.59   0.1357E-03
Station No. =   212  Bais = 0.0406
Station No. =   213  Bais = 0.0407
Station No. =   214  Bais = 0.0409
Station No. =   215  Bais = 0.0410
Station No. =   216  Bais = 0.0412
Station No. =   217  Bais = 0.0413
Station No. =   218  Bais = 0.0414
Station No. =   219  Bais = 0.0416
Station No. =   220  Bais = 0.0417
Station No. =   221  Bais = 0.0418


Station 222 to 231
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   8 Min/Max Sta: 222.- 231.  1 StdDev:  0.2690E-01 #Obs:  169  dOx: 0.075
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.025 0.1069E-02 0.1579E-03  -0.0249   0.82   9.18   0.1949E-04
Station No. =   222  Bais = 0.0290
Station No. =   223  Bais = 0.0290
Station No. =   224  Bais = 0.0291
Station No. =   225  Bais = 0.0291
Station No. =   226  Bais = 0.0291
Station No. =   227  Bais = 0.0291
Station No. =   228  Bais = 0.0291
Station No. =   229  Bais = 0.0292
Station No. =   230  Bais = 0.0292
Station No. =   231  Bais = 0.0292


Stations 232 to 240
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   6 Min/Max Sta: 232.- 240.  1 StdDev:  0.4332E-01 #Obs:  285  dOx: 0.121
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.005 0.1149E-02 0.1490E-03  -0.0284   0.90  10.00   0.7517E-04
Station No. =   232  Bais = 0.0127
Station No. =   233  Bais = 0.0128
Station No. =   234  Bais = 0.0128
Station No. =   235  Bais = 0.0129
Station No. =   236  Bais = 0.0130
Station No. =   237  Bais = 0.0131
Station No. =   238  Bais = 0.0131
Station No. =   239  Bais = 0.0132
Station No. =   240  Bais = 0.0133


Stations 241 to 246
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   6 Min/Max Sta: 241.- 246.  1 StdDev:  0.3474E-01 #Obs:   79  dOx: 0.097
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.015 0.1071E-02 0.1636E-03  -0.0250   0.85   3.17   0.4869E-04
Station No. =   241  Bais = 0.0264
Station No. =   242  Bais = 0.0264
Station No. =   243  Bais = 0.0265
Station No. =   244  Bais = 0.0265
Station No. =   245  Bais = 0.0266
Station No. =   246  Bais = 0.0266


Station 246
Manually adjusted bias of calculated oxygen in CTD and SEA file by 
+0.1 ml/l oxygen, to match water samlple data and CTD traces.




*********************************************************************
CTD09     CTD09    CTD09    CTD09    CTD09    CTD09    CTD09    CTD09
*********************************************************************

LEG 3  CTD 09
       CHILE TO EASTER ISLAND
       STATION 3

Station 3
 Edit Fact=  2.00 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
   8 Min/Max Sta:   3.-   3.  1 StdDev:  0.3573E-01 #Obs:   21  dOx: 0.071
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms: -0.007 0.9272E-03 0.1697E-03  -0.0285   0.90  10.00   0.0000E+00



LEG 4  CTD 09
       EASTER ISLAND TO NEW ZEALAND
       STATIONS 76 TO 85 , not including duplicate stations 112, 141,and 187


Stations 76 to 78
 Edit Fact=  2.30 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1000.00000000
  16 Min/Max Sta:  76.-  78.  1 StdDev:  0.1369E-01 #Obs:   74  dOx: 0.031
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.011 0.8891E-03 0.1654E-03  -0.0284   0.60  10.00   0.0000E+00


Stations 79, 81 to 85        Use fit of stations 76 to 79, 81 to 85
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch      3.00000000    1500.00000000
   9 Min/Max Sta:  76.-  85.  1 StdDev:  0.3899E-01 #Obs:  286  dOx: 0.109
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.020 0.8835E-03 0.1597E-03  -0.0286   0.59   9.17   0.0000E+00


Station 80 
 Edit Fact=  2.80 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   2 Min/Max Sta:  80.-  80.  1 StdDev:  0.6161E-01 #Obs:   35  dOx: 0.172
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.004 0.8364E-03 0.2127E-03  -0.0247   0.48   9.20   0.0000E+00



LEG 5  CTD 09
       NEW ZEALAND TO AUSTRALIA
       STATIONS 248 TO 267, not including duplicate stations 189, 247


Stations 248 to 257    Use fit of stations 249-255
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   4 Min/Max Sta: 249.- 255.  1 StdDev:  0.4877E-01 #Obs:   49  dOx: 0.122
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.012 0.8430E-03 0.1556E-03  -0.0288   0.50   6.90   0.9029E-04
Station No. =   249  Bais = 0.0349
Station No. =   250  Bais = 0.0350
Station No. =   251  Bais = 0.0351
Station No. =   252  Bais = 0.0352
Station No. =   253  Bais = 0.0353
Station No. =   254  Bais = 0.0354
Station No. =   255  Bais = 0.0355


Stations 258 to 267    Use fit of stations 258-264
 Edit Fact=  2.50 Histo Bin= 0.2500E-01 OcSlope= 0.1400E-02
  ratio upper/deep variance , P_switch  0.00000000E-01   0.00000000E-01
   4 Min/Max Sta: 258.- 264.  1 StdDev:  0.6324E-01 #Obs:   48  dOx: 0.158
          1: Bias  2:Slope     3:Pcor    4:Tcor   5: Wt  6: Lag  7: bias/station
 OX Parms:  0.003 0.8746E-03 0.1615E-03  -0.0293   0.55  10.67   0.7379E-04
Station No. =   258  Bais = 0.0220
Station No. =   259  Bais = 0.0221
Station No. =   260  Bais = 0.0221
Station No. =   261  Bais = 0.0222
Station No. =   262  Bais = 0.0223
Station No. =   263  Bais = 0.0223
Station No. =   264  Bais = 0.0224


Station 256
  Manually adjusted bias of calculated oxygen in CTD and SEA file by
  -0.1 ml/l oxygen, to match water samlple data and CTD traces.




TABLE OF CALIBRATION SCALING FACTORS USED TO DERIVE CTD OXYGEN DATA ON P06 

sta     bias          slope         pcor          tcor           wt           lag
---  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
  4  0.730000E-01  0.142800E-02  -.648500E-02  -.324000E-01  0.750000E-01  0.800000E+01
  5  -.154000E+00  0.123000E-02  0.307800E-03  -.319000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
  6  -.700000E-02  0.108900E-02  0.176100E-03  -.234000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
  7  -.700000E-02  0.108900E-02  0.176100E-03  -.234000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
  8  -.700000E-02  0.108900E-02  0.176100E-03  -.234000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
  9  -.700000E-02  0.108900E-02  0.176100E-03  -.234000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
 10  -.700000E-02  0.108900E-02  0.176100E-03  -.234000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
 11  -.700000E-02  0.108900E-02  0.176100E-03  -.234000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
 12  0.190000E-01  0.105800E-02  0.159600E-03  -.222000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.380000E+01
 13  0.190000E-01  0.105800E-02  0.159600E-03  -.222000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.380000E+01
 14  0.190000E-01  0.105800E-02  0.159600E-03  -.222000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.380000E+01
 15  0.190000E-01  0.105800E-02  0.159600E-03  -.222000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.380000E+01
 16  0.190000E-01  0.105800E-02  0.159600E-03  -.222000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.380000E+01
 17  0.190000E-01  0.105800E-02  0.159600E-03  -.222000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.380000E+01
 18  0.190000E-01  0.105800E-02  0.159600E-03  -.222000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.380000E+01

sta     bias          slope         pcor          tcor           wt           lag
---  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
 19  0.190000E-01  0.105800E-02  0.159600E-03  -.222000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.380000E+01
 20  0.190000E-01  0.105800E-02  0.159600E-03  -.222000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.380000E+01
 21  0.190000E-01  0.105800E-02  0.159600E-03  -.222000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.380000E+01
 22  0.360000E-01  0.995700E-03  0.160700E-03  -.197000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.370000E+01
 23  0.360000E-01  0.995700E-03  0.160700E-03  -.197000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.370000E+01
 24  0.360000E-01  0.995700E-03  0.160700E-03  -.197000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.370000E+01
 25  0.360000E-01  0.995700E-03  0.160700E-03  -.197000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.370000E+01
 26  0.270000E-01  0.104800E-02  0.157300E-03  -.251000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
 27  0.270000E-01  0.104800E-02  0.157300E-03  -.251000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
 28  0.270000E-01  0.104800E-02  0.157300E-03  -.251000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
 29  0.270000E-01  0.104800E-02  0.157300E-03  -.251000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
 30  0.270000E-01  0.104800E-02  0.157300E-03  -.251000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
 31  0.270000E-01  0.104800E-02  0.157300E-03  -.251000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
 32  0.270000E-01  0.104800E-02  0.157300E-03  -.251000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
 33  0.290000E-01  0.103200E-02  0.160300E-03  -.219000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
 34  0.290000E-01  0.103200E-02  0.160300E-03  -.219000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
 35  0.290000E-01  0.103200E-02  0.160300E-03  -.219000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
 36  0.290000E-01  0.103200E-02  0.160300E-03  -.219000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
 37  0.290000E-01  0.103200E-02  0.160300E-03  -.219000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
 38  0.290000E-01  0.103200E-02  0.160300E-03  -.219000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
 39  0.440000E-01  0.100100E-02  0.149000E-03  -.207000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.640000E+01
 40  0.440000E-01  0.100100E-02  0.149000E-03  -.207000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.640000E+01
 41  0.440000E-01  0.100100E-02  0.149000E-03  -.207000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.640000E+01
 42  0.440000E-01  0.100100E-02  0.149000E-03  -.207000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.640000E+01
 43  0.360000E-01  0.101700E-02  0.154300E-03  -.202000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.440000E+01
 44  0.360000E-01  0.101700E-02  0.154300E-03  -.202000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.440000E+01
 45  0.360000E-01  0.101700E-02  0.154300E-03  -.202000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.440000E+01
 46  0.360000E-01  0.102400E-02  0.153400E-03  -.228000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
 47  0.360000E-01  0.102400E-02  0.153400E-03  -.228000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
 48  0.360000E-01  0.102400E-02  0.153400E-03  -.228000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
 49  0.360000E-01  0.102400E-02  0.153400E-03  -.228000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
 50  0.360000E-01  0.102400E-02  0.153400E-03  -.228000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
 51  0.360000E-01  0.102400E-02  0.153400E-03  -.228000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
 52  0.360000E-01  0.102400E-02  0.153400E-03  -.228000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
 53  0.360000E-01  0.102400E-02  0.153400E-03  -.228000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
 54  0.360000E-01  0.102400E-02  0.153400E-03  -.228000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
 55  0.360000E-01  0.102400E-02  0.153400E-03  -.228000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
 56  0.360000E-01  0.102400E-02  0.153400E-03  -.228000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
 57  0.160000E-01  0.107200E-02  0.161200E-03  -.247000E-01  0.100000E+01  0.856000E+01

sta     bias          slope         pcor          tcor           wt           lag
---  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
 58  0.290000E-01  0.104500E-02  0.155100E-03  -.234000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.116000E+02
 59  0.290000E-01  0.104500E-02  0.155100E-03  -.234000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.116000E+02
 60  0.290000E-01  0.104500E-02  0.155100E-03  -.234000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.116000E+02
 61  0.290000E-01  0.104500E-02  0.155100E-03  -.234000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.116000E+02
 62  0.430000E-01  0.104400E-02  0.141100E-03  -.236000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.560000E+01
 63  0.430000E-01  0.105700E-02  0.142000E-03  -.241000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.750000E+01
 64  0.430000E-01  0.104400E-02  0.141100E-03  -.236000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.560000E+01
 65  0.430000E-01  0.104400E-02  0.141100E-03  -.236000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.560000E+01
 66  0.430000E-01  0.104400E-02  0.141100E-03  -.236000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.560000E+01
 67  0.430000E-01  0.104400E-02  0.141100E-03  -.236000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.560000E+01
 68  0.430000E-01  0.104400E-02  0.141100E-03  -.236000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.560000E+01
 69  0.320000E-01  0.105800E-02  0.149400E-03  -.244000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.900000E+01
 70  0.180000E-01  0.111400E-02  0.157200E-03  -.265000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
 71  0.320000E-01  0.105800E-02  0.149400E-03  -.244000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.900000E+01
 72  0.430000E-01  0.103200E-02  0.146900E-03  -.226000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.900000E+01
 75  0.430000E-01  0.103200E-02  0.146900E-03  -.226000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.900000E+01
 76  0.110000E-01  0.889100E-03  0.165400E-03  -.284000E-01  0.600000E+00  0.100000E+02
 77  0.110000E-01  0.889100E-03  0.165400E-03  -.284000E-01  0.600000E+00  0.100000E+02
 78  0.110000E-01  0.889100E-03  0.165400E-03  -.284000E-01  0.600000E+00  0.100000E+02
 79  0.200000E-01  0.883500E-03  0.159700E-03  -.286000E-01  0.590000E+00  0.917000E+01
 80  0.400000E-02  0.836400E-03  0.212700E-03  -.247000E-01  0.480000E+00  0.920000E+01
 81  0.200000E-01  0.883500E-03  0.159700E-03  -.286000E-01  0.590000E+00  0.917000E+01
 82  0.200000E-01  0.883500E-03  0.159700E-03  -.286000E-01  0.590000E+00  0.917000E+01
 83  0.200000E-01  0.883500E-03  0.159700E-03  -.286000E-01  0.590000E+00  0.917000E+01
 84  0.200000E-01  0.883500E-03  0.159700E-03  -.286000E-01  0.590000E+00  0.917000E+01
 85  0.200000E-01  0.883500E-03  0.159700E-03  -.286000E-01  0.590000E+00  0.917000E+01
 86  0.207000E-01  0.110900E-02  0.149500E-03  -.267000E-01  0.770000E+00  0.105400E+02
 87  0.209000E-01  0.110900E-02  0.149500E-03  -.267000E-01  0.770000E+00  0.105400E+02
 88  0.211000E-01  0.110900E-02  0.149500E-03  -.267000E-01  0.770000E+00  0.105400E+02
 89  0.213000E-01  0.110900E-02  0.149500E-03  -.267000E-01  0.770000E+00  0.105400E+02
 90  0.215000E-01  0.110900E-02  0.149500E-03  -.267000E-01  0.770000E+00  0.105400E+02
 91  0.217000E-01  0.110900E-02  0.149500E-03  -.267000E-01  0.770000E+00  0.105400E+02
 92  0.219000E-01  0.110900E-02  0.149500E-03  -.267000E-01  0.770000E+00  0.105400E+02
 93  0.242000E-01  0.110200E-02  0.148400E-03  -.272000E-01  0.700000E+00  0.100500E+02
 94  0.236000E-01  0.110200E-02  0.148400E-03  -.272000E-01  0.700000E+00  0.100500E+02
 95  0.229000E-01  0.110200E-02  0.148400E-03  -.272000E-01  0.700000E+00  0.100500E+02
 96  0.223000E-01  0.110200E-02  0.148400E-03  -.272000E-01  0.700000E+00  0.100500E+02
 97  0.216000E-01  0.110200E-02  0.148400E-03  -.272000E-01  0.700000E+00  0.100500E+02
 98  0.326000E-01  0.108300E-02  0.142600E-03  -.271000E-01  0.630000E+00  0.490000E+01
 99  0.328000E-01  0.108300E-02  0.142600E-03  -.271000E-01  0.630000E+00  0.490000E+01

sta     bias          slope         pcor          tcor           wt           lag
---  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
100  0.330000E-01  0.108300E-02  0.142600E-03  -.271000E-01  0.630000E+00  0.490000E+01
101  0.333000E-01  0.108300E-02  0.142600E-03  -.271000E-01  0.630000E+00  0.490000E+01
102  0.335000E-01  0.108300E-02  0.142600E-03  -.271000E-01  0.630000E+00  0.490000E+01
103  0.338000E-01  0.108300E-02  0.142600E-03  -.271000E-01  0.630000E+00  0.490000E+01
104  0.189000E-01  0.111500E-02  0.148600E-03  -.279000E-01  0.700000E+00  0.801000E+01
105  0.193000E-01  0.111500E-02  0.148600E-03  -.279000E-01  0.700000E+00  0.801000E+01
106  0.196000E-01  0.111500E-02  0.148600E-03  -.279000E-01  0.700000E+00  0.801000E+01
107  0.243000E-01  0.111200E-02  0.145700E-03  -.274000E-01  0.700000E+00  0.800000E+01
108  0.245000E-01  0.111200E-02  0.145700E-03  -.274000E-01  0.700000E+00  0.800000E+01
109  0.248000E-01  0.111200E-02  0.145700E-03  -.274000E-01  0.700000E+00  0.800000E+01
110  0.340000E-01  0.107100E-02  0.145200E-03  -.260000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
111  0.340000E-01  0.107100E-02  0.145200E-03  -.260000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
113  0.355000E-01  0.108700E-02  0.140200E-03  -.264000E-01  0.700000E+00  0.750000E+01
114  0.357000E-01  0.108700E-02  0.140200E-03  -.264000E-01  0.700000E+00  0.750000E+01
115  0.366000E-01  0.108000E-02  0.142100E-03  -.260000E-01  0.700000E+00  0.748000E+01
116  0.120000E-01  0.113900E-02  0.148600E-03  -.301000E-01  0.700000E+00  0.700000E+01
117  0.362000E-01  0.108000E-02  0.142100E-03  -.260000E-01  0.700000E+00  0.748000E+01
118  0.361000E-01  0.108000E-02  0.142100E-03  -.260000E-01  0.700000E+00  0.748000E+01
119  0.359000E-01  0.108000E-02  0.142100E-03  -.260000E-01  0.700000E+00  0.748000E+01
120  0.213000E-01  0.111600E-02  0.146500E-03  -.273000E-01  0.680000E+00  0.700000E+01
121  0.212000E-01  0.111600E-02  0.146500E-03  -.273000E-01  0.680000E+00  0.700000E+01
122  0.211000E-01  0.111600E-02  0.146500E-03  -.273000E-01  0.680000E+00  0.700000E+01
123  0.211000E-01  0.111600E-02  0.146500E-03  -.273000E-01  0.680000E+00  0.700000E+01
124  0.170000E-01  0.111700E-02  0.151000E-03  -.272000E-01  0.640000E+00  0.686000E+01
125  0.700000E-02  0.116700E-02  0.150000E-03  -.288000E-01  0.780000E+00  0.800000E+01
126  0.700000E-02  0.116700E-02  0.150000E-03  -.288000E-01  0.780000E+00  0.800000E+01
127  0.940000E-02  0.115400E-02  0.150100E-03  -.287000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
128  0.950000E-02  0.115400E-02  0.150100E-03  -.287000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
129  0.970000E-02  0.115400E-02  0.150100E-03  -.287000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
130  0.980000E-02  0.115400E-02  0.150100E-03  -.287000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
131  0.830000E-02  0.116100E-02  0.149700E-03  -.288000E-01  0.760000E+00  0.800000E+01
132  0.840000E-02  0.116100E-02  0.149700E-03  -.288000E-01  0.760000E+00  0.800000E+01
133  0.850000E-02  0.116100E-02  0.149700E-03  -.288000E-01  0.760000E+00  0.800000E+01
134  0.860000E-02  0.116100E-02  0.149700E-03  -.288000E-01  0.760000E+00  0.800000E+01
135  0.880000E-02  0.116100E-02  0.149700E-03  -.288000E-01  0.760000E+00  0.800000E+01
136  0.300000E-02  0.118000E-02  0.151800E-03  -.299000E-01  0.640000E+00  0.800000E+01
137  0.280000E-02  0.118900E-02  0.148700E-03  -.299000E-01  0.810000E+00  0.868000E+01
138  0.280000E-02  0.118900E-02  0.148700E-03  -.299000E-01  0.810000E+00  0.868000E+01

sta     bias          slope         pcor          tcor           wt           lag
---  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
139  0.280000E-02  0.118900E-02  0.148700E-03  -.299000E-01  0.810000E+00  0.868000E+01
140  0.280000E-02  0.118900E-02  0.148700E-03  -.299000E-01  0.810000E+00  0.868000E+01
142  0.290000E-02  0.118900E-02  0.148700E-03  -.299000E-01  0.810000E+00  0.868000E+01
143  0.290000E-02  0.118900E-02  0.148700E-03  -.299000E-01  0.810000E+00  0.868000E+01
144  0.290000E-02  0.118900E-02  0.148700E-03  -.299000E-01  0.810000E+00  0.868000E+01
145  0.100000E-01  0.117200E-02  0.147000E-03  -.307000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
146  0.100000E-01  0.117200E-02  0.147000E-03  -.307000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
147  0.100000E-01  0.117200E-02  0.147000E-03  -.307000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
148  0.100000E-01  0.117200E-02  0.147000E-03  -.307000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
149  0.100000E-01  0.117200E-02  0.147000E-03  -.307000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
150  0.100000E-01  0.117200E-02  0.147000E-03  -.307000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.800000E+01
151  0.750000E-02  0.118900E-02  0.146900E-03  -.297000E-01  0.790000E+00  0.151500E+02
152  0.760000E-02  0.118900E-02  0.146900E-03  -.297000E-01  0.790000E+00  0.151500E+02
153  0.760000E-02  0.118900E-02  0.146900E-03  -.297000E-01  0.790000E+00  0.151500E+02
154  0.770000E-02  0.118900E-02  0.146900E-03  -.297000E-01  0.790000E+00  0.151500E+02
155  0.770000E-02  0.118900E-02  0.146900E-03  -.297000E-01  0.790000E+00  0.151500E+02
156  0.700000E-02  0.119500E-02  0.145800E-03  -.309000E-01  0.720000E+00  0.231500E+02
157  0.400000E-02  0.120700E-02  0.146700E-03  -.305000E-01  0.800000E+00  0.153500E+02
158  0.400000E-02  0.120700E-02  0.146700E-03  -.305000E-01  0.800000E+00  0.153500E+02
159  0.400000E-02  0.120700E-02  0.146700E-03  -.305000E-01  0.800000E+00  0.153500E+02
160  0.140000E-01  0.118300E-02  0.144500E-03  -.299000E-01  0.810000E+00  0.909000E+01
161  0.140000E-01  0.118300E-02  0.144500E-03  -.299000E-01  0.810000E+00  0.909000E+01
162  0.140000E-01  0.118300E-02  0.144500E-03  -.299000E-01  0.810000E+00  0.909000E+01
163  -.200000E-02  0.122400E-02  0.147100E-03  -.325000E-01  0.700000E+00  0.900000E+01
164  0.155000E-01  0.116100E-02  0.145800E-03  -.290000E-01  0.740000E+00  0.468000E+01
165  0.154000E-01  0.116100E-02  0.145800E-03  -.290000E-01  0.740000E+00  0.468000E+01
166  0.153000E-01  0.116100E-02  0.145800E-03  -.290000E-01  0.740000E+00  0.468000E+01
167  0.152000E-01  0.116100E-02  0.145800E-03  -.290000E-01  0.740000E+00  0.468000E+01
168  0.570000E-02  0.119400E-02  0.146900E-03  -.303000E-01  0.820000E+00  0.300000E+01
169  0.580000E-02  0.119400E-02  0.146900E-03  -.303000E-01  0.820000E+00  0.300000E+01
170  0.580000E-02  0.119400E-02  0.146900E-03  -.303000E-01  0.820000E+00  0.300000E+01
171  -.910000E-02  0.127000E-02  0.145300E-03  -.393000E-01  0.900000E+00  0.300000E+01
172  -.920000E-02  0.127000E-02  0.145300E-03  -.393000E-01  0.900000E+00  0.300000E+01
173  -.920000E-02  0.127000E-02  0.145300E-03  -.393000E-01  0.900000E+00  0.300000E+01
174  -.930000E-02  0.127000E-02  0.145300E-03  -.393000E-01  0.900000E+00  0.300000E+01
175  0.160000E-01  0.117500E-02  0.144700E-03  -.296000E-01  0.900000E+00  0.300000E+01
176  0.160000E-01  0.117500E-02  0.144700E-03  -.296000E-01  0.900000E+00  0.300000E+01
177  0.160000E-01  0.117500E-02  0.144700E-03  -.296000E-01  0.900000E+00  0.300000E+01
178  0.160000E-01  0.117500E-02  0.144700E-03  -.296000E-01  0.900000E+00  0.300000E+01

sta     bias          slope         pcor          tcor           wt           lag
---  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
179  0.258000E-01  0.108500E-02  0.154600E-03  -.244000E-01  0.840000E+00  0.300000E+01
180  0.259000E-01  0.108500E-02  0.154600E-03  -.244000E-01  0.840000E+00  0.300000E+01
181  0.260000E-01  0.108500E-02  0.154600E-03  -.244000E-01  0.840000E+00  0.300000E+01
182  0.260000E-01  0.108500E-02  0.154600E-03  -.244000E-01  0.840000E+00  0.300000E+01
183  0.400000E-01  0.108300E-02  0.134600E-03  -.249000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.800000E+01
184  0.400000E-01  0.108300E-02  0.134600E-03  -.249000E-01  0.950000E+00  0.800000E+01
185  0.150000E-01  0.113600E-02  0.148000E-03  -.269000E-01  0.870000E+00  0.800000E+01
186  0.145000E-01  0.113600E-02  0.148000E-03  -.269000E-01  0.870000E+00  0.800000E+01
188  0.135000E-01  0.113600E-02  0.148000E-03  -.269000E-01  0.870000E+00  0.800000E+01
190  0.486000E-01  0.107100E-02  0.129000E-03  -.261000E-01  0.720000E+00  0.120000E+01
191  0.489000E-01  0.107100E-02  0.129000E-03  -.261000E-01  0.720000E+00  0.120000E+01
192  0.492000E-01  0.107100E-02  0.129000E-03  -.261000E-01  0.720000E+00  0.120000E+01
193  0.495000E-01  0.107100E-02  0.129000E-03  -.261000E-01  0.720000E+00  0.120000E+01
194  0.498000E-01  0.107100E-02  0.129000E-03  -.261000E-01  0.720000E+00  0.120000E+01
195  0.370000E-01  0.110000E-02  0.134700E-03  -.273000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.510000E+01
196  0.372000E-01  0.110000E-02  0.134700E-03  -.273000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.510000E+01
197  0.374000E-01  0.110000E-02  0.134700E-03  -.273000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.510000E+01
198  0.376000E-01  0.110000E-02  0.134700E-03  -.273000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.510000E+01
199  0.377000E-01  0.110000E-02  0.134700E-03  -.273000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.510000E+01
200  0.379000E-01  0.110000E-02  0.134700E-03  -.273000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.510000E+01
201  0.381000E-01  0.110000E-02  0.134700E-03  -.273000E-01  0.750000E+00  0.510000E+01
202  0.531000E-01  0.106300E-02  0.130700E-03  -.253000E-01  0.730000E+00  0.510000E+01
203  0.532000E-01  0.106300E-02  0.130700E-03  -.253000E-01  0.730000E+00  0.510000E+01
204  0.533000E-01  0.106300E-02  0.130700E-03  -.253000E-01  0.730000E+00  0.510000E+01
205  0.535000E-01  0.106300E-02  0.130700E-03  -.253000E-01  0.730000E+00  0.510000E+01
206  0.536000E-01  0.106300E-02  0.130700E-03  -.253000E-01  0.730000E+00  0.510000E+01
207  0.537000E-01  0.106300E-02  0.130700E-03  -.253000E-01  0.730000E+00  0.510000E+01
208  0.539000E-01  0.106300E-02  0.130700E-03  -.253000E-01  0.730000E+00  0.510000E+01
209  0.540000E-01  0.106300E-02  0.130700E-03  -.253000E-01  0.730000E+00  0.510000E+01
210  0.541000E-01  0.106300E-02  0.130700E-03  -.253000E-01  0.730000E+00  0.510000E+01
211  0.543000E-01  0.106300E-02  0.130700E-03  -.253000E-01  0.730000E+00  0.510000E+01
212  0.406000E-01  0.107600E-02  0.138800E-03  -.256000E-01  0.740000E+00  0.859000E+01
213  0.407000E-01  0.107600E-02  0.138800E-03  -.256000E-01  0.740000E+00  0.859000E+01
214  0.409000E-01  0.107600E-02  0.138800E-03  -.256000E-01  0.740000E+00  0.859000E+01
215  0.410000E-01  0.107600E-02  0.138800E-03  -.256000E-01  0.740000E+00  0.859000E+01
216  0.412000E-01  0.107600E-02  0.138800E-03  -.256000E-01  0.740000E+00  0.859000E+01
217  0.413000E-01  0.107600E-02  0.138800E-03  -.256000E-01  0.740000E+00  0.859000E+01
218  0.414000E-01  0.107600E-02  0.138800E-03  -.256000E-01  0.740000E+00  0.859000E+01
219  0.416000E-01  0.107600E-02  0.138800E-03  -.256000E-01  0.740000E+00  0.859000E+01

sta     bias          slope         pcor          tcor           wt           lag
---  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
220  0.417000E-01  0.107600E-02  0.138800E-03  -.256000E-01  0.740000E+00  0.859000E+01
221  0.418000E-01  0.107600E-02  0.138800E-03  -.256000E-01  0.740000E+00  0.859000E+01
222  0.290000E-01  0.106900E-02  0.157900E-03  -.249000E-01  0.820000E+00  0.918000E+01
223  0.290000E-01  0.106900E-02  0.157900E-03  -.249000E-01  0.820000E+00  0.918000E+01
224  0.291000E-01  0.106900E-02  0.157900E-03  -.249000E-01  0.820000E+00  0.918000E+01
225  0.291000E-01  0.106900E-02  0.157900E-03  -.249000E-01  0.820000E+00  0.918000E+01
226  0.291000E-01  0.106900E-02  0.157900E-03  -.249000E-01  0.820000E+00  0.918000E+01
227  0.291000E-01  0.106900E-02  0.157900E-03  -.249000E-01  0.820000E+00  0.918000E+01
228  0.291000E-01  0.106900E-02  0.157900E-03  -.249000E-01  0.820000E+00  0.918000E+01
229  0.292000E-01  0.106900E-02  0.157900E-03  -.249000E-01  0.820000E+00  0.918000E+01
230  0.292000E-01  0.106900E-02  0.157900E-03  -.249000E-01  0.820000E+00  0.918000E+01
231  0.292000E-01  0.106900E-02  0.157900E-03  -.249000E-01  0.820000E+00  0.918000E+01
232  0.127000E-01  0.114900E-02  0.149000E-03  -.284000E-01  0.900000E+00  0.100000E+02
233  0.128000E-01  0.114900E-02  0.149000E-03  -.284000E-01  0.900000E+00  0.100000E+02
234  0.128000E-01  0.114900E-02  0.149000E-03  -.284000E-01  0.900000E+00  0.100000E+02
235  0.129000E-01  0.114900E-02  0.149000E-03  -.284000E-01  0.900000E+00  0.100000E+02
236  0.130000E-01  0.114900E-02  0.149000E-03  -.284000E-01  0.900000E+00  0.100000E+02
237  0.131000E-01  0.114900E-02  0.149000E-03  -.284000E-01  0.900000E+00  0.100000E+02
238  0.131000E-01  0.114900E-02  0.149000E-03  -.284000E-01  0.900000E+00  0.100000E+02
239  0.132000E-01  0.114900E-02  0.149000E-03  -.284000E-01  0.900000E+00  0.100000E+02
240  0.133000E-01  0.114900E-02  0.149000E-03  -.284000E-01  0.900000E+00  0.100000E+02
241  0.264000E-01  0.107100E-02  0.163600E-03  -.250000E-01  0.850000E+00  0.317000E+01
242  0.264000E-01  0.107100E-02  0.163600E-03  -.250000E-01  0.850000E+00  0.317000E+01
243  0.265000E-01  0.107100E-02  0.163600E-03  -.250000E-01  0.850000E+00  0.317000E+01
244  0.265000E-01  0.107100E-02  0.163600E-03  -.250000E-01  0.850000E+00  0.317000E+01
245  0.266000E-01  0.107100E-02  0.163600E-03  -.250000E-01  0.850000E+00  0.317000E+01
246  0.266000E-01  0.107100E-02  0.163600E-03  -.250000E-01  0.850000E+00  0.317000E+01
248  0.349000E-01  0.843000E-03  0.155600E-03  -.288000E-01  0.500000E+00  0.690000E+01
249  0.349000E-01  0.843000E-03  0.155600E-03  -.288000E-01  0.500000E+00  0.690000E+01
250  0.350000E-01  0.843000E-03  0.155600E-03  -.288000E-01  0.500000E+00  0.690000E+01
251  0.351000E-01  0.843000E-03  0.155600E-03  -.288000E-01  0.500000E+00  0.690000E+01
252  0.352000E-01  0.843000E-03  0.155600E-03  -.288000E-01  0.500000E+00  0.690000E+01
253  0.353000E-01  0.843000E-03  0.155600E-03  -.288000E-01  0.500000E+00  0.690000E+01
254  0.354000E-01  0.843000E-03  0.155600E-03  -.288000E-01  0.500000E+00  0.690000E+01
255  0.355000E-01  0.843000E-03  0.155600E-03  -.288000E-01  0.500000E+00  0.690000E+01
256  0.355000E-01  0.843000E-03  0.155600E-03  -.288000E-01  0.500000E+00  0.690000E+01
257  0.355000E-01  0.843000E-03  0.155600E-03  -.288000E-01  0.500000E+00  0.690000E+01
258  0.220000E-01  0.874600E-03  0.161500E-03  -.293000E-01  0.550000E+00  0.106700E+02
259  0.221000E-01  0.874600E-03  0.161500E-03  -.293000E-01  0.550000E+00  0.106700E+02
260  0.221000E-01  0.874600E-03  0.161500E-03  -.293000E-01  0.550000E+00  0.106700E+02
261  0.222000E-01  0.874600E-03  0.161500E-03  -.293000E-01  0.550000E+00  0.106700E+02
262  0.223000E-01  0.874600E-03  0.161500E-03  -.293000E-01  0.550000E+00  0.106700E+02
263  0.223000E-01  0.874600E-03  0.161500E-03  -.293000E-01  0.550000E+00  0.106700E+02
264  0.224000E-01  0.874600E-03  0.161500E-03  -.293000E-01  0.550000E+00  0.106700E+02
265  0.224000E-01  0.874600E-03  0.161500E-03  -.293000E-01  0.550000E+00  0.106700E+02
266  0.224000E-01  0.874600E-03  0.161500E-03  -.293000E-01  0.550000E+00  0.106700E+02
267  0.224000E-01  0.874600E-03  0.161500E-03  -.293000E-01  0.550000E+00  0.106700E+02




QUALITY CONTROL OF 2-DBAR CTD DATA

SALTS:

Salinity spikes on or near sea surface were not uncommon. Guideline for quality 
marking: If the spike is greater than .2  mark the quality word as bad. For 
spikes smaller than .2 mark quality word as questionable. Don't mark if spike is 
substantiated by water samples(see station 55). The spike might get through 
without a questionable if its a small spike that changes with temperature as 
well as salinity and is a spike to the fresh side.

Causes: As package enters water it is possible the pressure averaging for the 
first three dbrs. is incorporating conductivity data from above and below the 
water causing big salt spikes.


OXYGENS:

Surface spikes, were the norm for the entire cruise. These were
neither individually identified nor the quality word labeled.  

Noisy data in top 500 db for all CTD10 stations on Leg3 
associated with use of oxygen pump. Leg3 variability on the order of 
+/-.2 ml/l. Leg 4 and 5 variability on the order of +/-.05 ml/l.

Bottom tails, where oxygen is drifts off low are common in 
Legs 4 and 5. Likely due to the slowing descent rate of the CTD as it
approaches the bottom. The reduced flow past the oxygen sensor results
in a lower oxygen current and thus lower oxygen value.


PROCESSING: STATION BY STATION NOTES ON FITTING, INTERPOLATIONS, SPIKES ETC.

  1  Test station
  2  Test station
  3  Test station
  4  Surface spike in salinity. 1,3 db salts marked bad.
     Refit station 4's oxygen data by itself. Formerly stations 4
     and 5 fit together.
  5  Surface spike in salinity. 1 db salt marked questionable.
  6  Oxygen too high, adjusted by -.04ml/l in CTD and SEA file.
  7  Deep water spike in salinity. Interpolate salinity 1233 to 1251db.
  8  Spike in salinity. Interpolate salinity 171 to 185.
     Spike in salinity. Interpolate salinity 1825 to 1843.
     Spike in oxygen. Interpolate oxygen 1819 to 1847.
  9  Jump in oxygen, -.04 from 1.55 to 1.65 deg.theta. Could be
     real, quality word left at 2.
 10  Surface spike in salinity. 1,3 db salt marked bad.
 11
 12  Initially missing top 400 meters of data due to beginning bad
     records in raw data being interpreted as beginning pressure by
     the pressure averaging program.  Top 400 meters recovered.
     Spike in salinity. Interpolate 381db salt.
     CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 57 db as
     questionable. 
 13
 14  Surface spike in salinity. 1 db salt marked bad.
 15  CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 79 dbs as
     questionable. 
     CTD oxygen might be off around 5 degrees theta, unclear from
     bottles,  CTD quality word left as good.
 16  CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 57 db as
     questionable. 
 17
 18  Deep water spike in salinity due to incorrect data at end
     of file. The pressure averaging program interpolates all the
     2db bins between last good point and first bad point adding ~200 db 
     of bad information which goes below the ocean floor. The bad data 
     at the bottom of the file were removed.  
     CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 81db as
     questionable. 
 19

 20  Spike in salinity. Interpolate salt 223 to 231db.
     CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 73 db as
     questionable. 
 21
 22  
 23  Wayward salinity. Interpolate salt 67 to 73 db.
     CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 77 db as
     questionable. 
 24  Wayward salinity. Interpolate salt 63 to 71 db.
     CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 71 db as
     questionable. 
 25  Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 db salts as bad.
 26  CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 73 db as
     questionable. 
     Tried to refit CTD to match deep bottles better. No better fit
     found so fit left as it was.
 27  CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 93 db as
     questionable. 
 29  Deep water spike in salinity. Interpolate salt 1637 to 1761db.
 31  Deep water spike in salinity. Interpolate salt 2041 to 2059db.
     Deep water spike in oxygen. Interpolate oxygen 2045 to 2053 db.
 32  Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 db salts as bad.
     CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 83 db as
     questionable. 
 33  CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 67 db as
     questionable. 
 34  CTD oxygen lower than bottles  at 2.6 deg.theta. Doesn't look
     quite right but quality word left as good.
 36  CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 75 db as
     questionable. 
 37  CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 65 db as
     questionable. 
 39  CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 73 db as
     questionable. 
 40  CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 101 db as
     questionable. 
 41  CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 73 db as
     questionable. 
 42  Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1db salts as bad. 
     Theta salinity plot shows looping. Changing water (fresher than
     41 and 43) may add to variability?
 44  CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 65 db as
     questionable. 
 46  CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 87 db as
     questionable. 
 47  CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 189 db as
     questionable. 
 49  CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 87 db as
     questionable. 
 50  CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 123 db as
     questionable. 
 51  CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 79 db as
     questionable. 
 52  CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 52 db as
     questionable. 
 53  CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 113 db as
     questionable.
     Mark oxygens in deeper region for same reason, 555 to 799db.
 54  Deep water spike in salinity. Interpolate salt 3177 to 3183db.
     CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 85 db as
     questionable.
 56  CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 95 db as
     questionable.
 57  Station 57 oxygen data refit by itself. Formerly fit with
     stations 46 to 57.
 58  CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 159 db as
     questionable.
 59  Small surface spike in salinty called ok- spike has changed
     theta which makes it much more likely to be real.   
     CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 231 db as
     questionable.
 60  CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 131 db as
     questionable.
 61  CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 161 db as
     questionable and 423 to 775 as questionable.
 62  Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1-5db salts as bad.
 63  Spike in salinity. Interpolate salt 535 to 581db.
     Gap in data. Interpolate temperature, and salinity  535
     to 581db. Interpolate oxygen 531 to 589
     CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 213 db as
     questionable.
     Stations 62, 64 and particularly 63 show more noise at depth 
     than other stations in the oxygen profile.  Could be due to 
     non uniform lowering rate associated with poor sea state.
 64  CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 251 db as
     questionable.
 69  Spike in oxygen. Interpolate oxygen 81 to 105db.
 70 to 72 Oxygen is noisier than usual, especially station 72. Salinity
     profile also has more looping in it.  Both salinity and oxygen
     showing noise and loops supports the thought that the noise 
     is caused by nonuniform lowering rate due to bad weather or big
     seas. The lowering rate varies from .5m/s to 2m/s unlike
     station 69 where the lowering rate was fairly consistent at 1m/s.
 71  CTD oxygen does not agree with bottles. Mark top 151 db as
     questionable.
 72  Seeing loops in theta salinity plots.
     
     

LEG 4
     
 75  Looks like it is on its own in theta salinity plot but it is
     consistent with station 71 which is moving between station 72 
     and 75.
 76  to 78 refit. The bottom oxygens were not matching the bottles. The 
     original fit was from a larger group 76 to 85. 
 78  Oxygen does not reach oxygen minimum defined by bottles at
     3 degrees theta.
 79  Large gap in data. Winch died near 1880db.  CTD stopped logging at
     this depth and was not started again until 2100db.
     Fix: Linear interpolation of temperature from 1879 to 2109 db.
     Salt and oxygen information copied from station 78 at matching
     theta intervals. Salt replaced from 1831 to 2401 db. Oxygen
     replaced from 1831 to the bottom.
     Oxygen does not reach oxygen minimum defined by bottles at 3
     deg.
 80  Oxygen lower than bottles at 7 deg. theta. Quality word not
     adjusted. 
 81  Bottom spike in oxygen spanning 3127 to 3393 db. 
     This corresponds to the change in the rate of decent as the CTD
     approaches the bottom. This was checked and found true for Stations
     84 through 87 as well.
 93  to 97:
     Variability in oxygen profile increase. Due to sea state?
101  and 102:
     CTD oxygen appears high from 8 to 14 deg.theta by .1 ml/l in both
     stations 101 and 102
111  Refit oxygen in station 111 by itself. Formerly in group of
     stations 111,113, 114
118  and 119:
     CTD oxygen in 118 and 119 is marginal between good and
     questionable , low from 3 to 8deg.theta. Quality word left as good.
119  Bottom oxygen drifts high from bottom five bottles. Marked 
     oxygens as questionable throughout the drift, 4661 to 5620 db.
124  Refit oxygen be itself. Formerly fit in group 120 through 124.
128   Abrupt change into new water.
130  Deep water spike in salinity. Interpolate salt 4285 to 4301db
     Deep oxygen has looping, jagged, noisier than the other
     stations. 
131  Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 db salts as bad.
132  Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 db salts as questionable.
135  Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 db salts as questionable.  
136  Acquistion computers crashed 700 m off the bottom.  Acquistion
     halted and resumed. When resumed, oxygen had changed to a lower
     oxygen by .04 ml/l. Marked oxygen quality word as bad from 4905
     db, where the jump occured to the bottom.
137  to 142 bottle oxygens appear low, CTD oxygens are consistent with
     earlier stations.
137  Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 db salts as questionable.
     Station +.002 psu than other stations. Salt slope reduced in
     calibrations files.
139  Spike in salinity at bottom of cast. Mark last data point as bad.
143  Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 db salts as bad.
     Big surface spike in oxygen. Mark 1 db oxygen and temperature bad.
145  to 150:
     Refit oxygens in this group to get bottom oxygens to match
     bottles. Bottom oxygens now match better although top , near
     sea surface looks a little worse. 
147  Data has gap where there were no observations 2259 to 2313db.
     Salinity spikes. Interpolate salt 1903,1909,1911,1931,1991, 
     2067-2085, 2093-2097, 2013-2027, 2157-2171, 2181-2189, 2257-2321db.
     Oxygen spikes. Interpolate oxygen 2073 to 2133 and 2257 to 2321db.
     Temperature was also interpolated over this range.
148  Bottom oxygen spike. Mark oxygen as questionable 6400db to
     bottom. 
151  Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 db salts as bad.
156  to 167:
     show two systematic spikes (small, around
     .002 psu) occuring near 2300db and 4400db.
     Interpolate over salt spike 5511 to 5545db.
156  Gap in data. Interpolate over gap for temperature, salt and
     oxygen from 5513 to 5547db.
     Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 db salts as bad.
     Surface spike in oxygen. Mark 1 db bad.
157  Interpolate over salt spike 4409 to 4411db.
158  Gap in data. Interpolate over gap for temperature, salt and
     oxygen from 5521 to 5559db.
     Interpolate over additional salt spike 4415 to 4449db.
159  Interpolate over salt spike 2333 to 2353db.
     Interpolate over oxygen spike 5525 to 5545.
160  to 162:
     Refit oxygen because bottom of profile was too high (.04ml/l). 
160  Interpolate over salt spike 4415 to 4433db.
161  Interpolate over salt spikes 2307 to 2323 and 4359 to 4361db.
162  Interpolate over salt spike 2357 to 2365db.
163  Interpolate over salt spikes 2363 to 2375 and 4327 to 4339db.
164  Gap in data, 4565 to 4603db. Interpolate temperature, salt and
     oxygen.
     Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1 db salts as questionable.  
165  Gap in data, 5593 to 5649db. Interpolate temperatre, salt and
     oxygen. 
166  Gap in data, 5617 to 5645db. Interpolate temperature,salt and
     oxygen. 
     Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1 db salts as bad.
167  Interpolate over salt spike 5613 to 5631db.
     Interpolate over oxygen spike 5611 to 5631 db.
171  to 174
     CTD oxygen does not looked scaled correctly. CTD is .4 ml/l low
     from 8 deg. theta to surface. Close look at CTD below 2deg.
     theta looks fine. Bottle data used for fitting had not been
     corrected for bottles out of order. This may have caused a
     problem if bottles were subsequently reorderd.
171  Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 db salts as bad.
     Interpolate over salt spike at 2501db.
173  Spike in salinity. Interpolate 103 db.
174  Interpolate over salt spike 6537 to 6549db.
     
     

LEG 5
     
181  Bottom oxygen is high.
182  to 188  CTD is uniform but water sample salt high,.001psu, 
     in deep water
185  Spike in salinity. Mark 1,3,5 db salts as bad.
195  Small spike in salinity with looping in theta v salt plot. 
     Interpolate 405 to 461db.
197  Oxygen data noiser than usual.
198  Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 db salts as bad. 
     Small spike in salt, interpolate 849 db.
     Nice crossover from one water mass to the next through stations
197  to 199.
199  Bottom bottle is deeper than CTD downtrace by 7db. 
200  Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 db salts as bad. Small spike, 
     interpolate salt at 1063 db.
201  Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 db salts as bad. Spikes/ density
     inversion, interpolate  453db and 457db.
     Salinity spike at bottom. Mark last salt record, 2275db., as bad.
202  Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1 db salt as questionable. Spikes /
     density inversions, interpolate 453db and 459db.
207  Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1 db salt as bad. 
209  Small spike in salinity, interpolate 375db.
210  Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 db salts as questionable. 
211  Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 db salts as bad. 
213  Spike in salinity. Interpolate salts 553 to 561db.
215  Surface spike in salintiy. Supported by water sample, accepted 
     as good.   
     Bottom spike in salinity. Mark last salt record, 3423db. as bad.
219  Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 db salts as questionable. 
222  Salinity jumps low, stays low, then jumps back to where it was.
     Due to temporary contamination of the cell? Interpolate salts over
     jump from 547 to 567db.
223  Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1 db salt as bad. 
224  Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1,3 db salts as bad. 
226  Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1db salt as questionable. 
227  Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1 db salt as questionable. 
     CTD oxygen low compared to bottles from 18 deg. theta to
     surface. Quality word left as good.
232  Oxygen is a litle high at bottom,.04 
235  Odd structure in salt 14 to 16 deg theta. Left as is.
     Interpolate salinity spike 1087 to 1095db.
236  Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1 db salt as bad. Interpolate
     over salinity spike 1537 to 1553 db.
     CTD oxygen low compared to bottles by .04 ml/l. Quality word
     left as good.
240  Surface spike in salinity. Mark 1db salt as questionable.
     Interpolate over salinity spike at 23db.
242  Small salinity spike, interpolate salt from 383 to 401.
245  Very warm water at surface.
     Oxygen too low, a bias of .1 ml/l added to profile.
248  Station salt is+.002 psu than other stations. Salt slope 
     reduced in calibrations files.
     Interpolate oxygens over 1741 to 1757
253  Interpolate over salinity spike 649 to 659 db.
256  Oxygen too high, a bias of .1ml/l subtracted from profile.




LIST OF INTERPOLATIONS MADE TO DATA. 
  Any 2db bin in the CTD file that had no observations automatically
  was assigned a "6" in all quality fields.  Those bins with no
  observations have not been included in this list. 

                     St. Bad  Interpolated  End Bad
                STA  Pressure  Parameter    Pressure
                ---  -------- ------------  --------
                  7    1233        3          1251
                  8     171        3           185
                  8    1825        3          1843
                  8    1819        4          1847
                 20     223        3           231
                 23      67        3            73
                 24      63        3            71
                 29    1637        3          1761
                 31    2041        3          2059
                 31    2045        4          2053
                 54    3177        3          3183
                 63     435        2           581
                 63     535        3           581
                 63     531        4           589
                 69      81        4           105
                 95     283        3           283
                103       9        3             9
                105    1057        3          1057
                130    4285        3          4301
                147    2259        2          2313
                147    1903        3          1903
                147    1909        3          1909
                147    1911        3          1911
                147    1991        3          1991
                147    2013        3          2027
                147    2067        3          2085
                147    2093        3          2097
                147    2157        3          2171
                147    2181        3          2189
                147    2257        3          2321
                147    2073        4          2133
                147    2255        4          2321
                156    5513        2          5547
                156    5511        3          5545
                156    5511        4          5547
                157    4409        3          4411
                158    5521        2          5559
                158    4415        3          4449
                158    5519        3          5559

                     St. Bad  Interpolated  End Bad
                STA  Pressure  Parameter    Pressure
                ---  -------- ------------  --------
                158    5521        4          5559
                159    2333        3          2253
                159    5525        4          5545
                160    4415        3          4433
                161    2307        3          2323
                161    4359        3          4361
                162    2357        3          2365
                163    2363        3          2375
                163    4327        3          4339
                164    4565        2          4603
                164    4563        3          4599
                164    4559        4          4601
                165    5595        2          5649
                165    5593        3          5649
                165    5591        4          5649
                166    5619        2          5645
                166    5619        3          5645
                166    5617        4          5645
                167    5613        3          5631
                167    5611        4          5631
                171    2501        3          2501
                173     103        3           103
                174    6537        3          6549
                195     405        3           461
                198     849        3           849
                200    1063        3          1063
                201     453        3           453
                201     457        3           457
                202     453        3           453
                202     459        3           459
                209     375        3           375
                213     553        3           561
                222     547        3           567
                235    1087        3          1095
                236    1537        3          1553
                240      23        3            23
                242     383        3           401
                248    1741        4          1757
                248    2217        4          2235
                253     649        3           659
   
   
   

REFERENCES

Millard, R.C., Jr. 1982.  CTD calibration and data processing
  techniques at WHOI using the 1987 practical salinity scale.  Marine
  Technology Society Conference paper.

Millard, R., G. Bond and J. Toole, 1992.  Implementation of a titanium
  strain gauge pressure transducer for CTD applications.  Deep-Sea Res.,
  1009-1021.  

Millard, R.C. and K. Yang, 1993.  CTD calibration and processing
  methods used at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.  WHOI Tech.
  Report No. 93-44.  95 pgs.

Owens, W.B. and R.C. Millard, Jr., 1985.  A new algorithm for CTD
  oxygen calibration. J. Phys. Oc. 15, 621-631.




          
                
____________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________
                
          
WOCE DATA PROCESSING NOTES

DATE      LEGS    CONTACT      DATA TYPE      DATA STATUS  SUMMARY
--------  ------  -----------  -------------  ---------------------
02/27/95  P06E    Mantyla      NUTs/S/O       DQE Report Submitted
              
03/06/95  P06C    Mantyla      NUTs/S/O       DQE Report Submitted
              
03/07/95  P06W    Mantyla      NUTs/S/O       DQE Report Submitted
              
04/03/95  P06CEW  White        CTD            DQE Report Submitted
              
11/09/95  P06CEW  Jennings-Jr  NUTs           PI Response to DQE Report
          PI OKs Public Release
              
07/09/96  P06CEW  Key          DELC14         DQE Report Submitted
              
02/12/98  P06W    Key          BTL            Data Update; values corrected
          The following entry errors were recently found in the P6W sea file. 
          I'm not sure that the files I have are the current version, but here it is:
          
          In each case one bottle number is duplicated and the next number is 
          missing suggesting a simple typo and obvious correction. These corrections 
          are important only for lab these numbers to "match" when merging data.
          
          P6,258,1,6
          P6,258,1,9
          P6,259,1,5
          P6,260,1,6
          P6,262,1,3
              
12/14/98  P06CEW  Key          DELC14         Data are Public
          My policy has been to get any data I have to WHP within 1wk of receiving 
          the preliminary data report from NOSAMS. This includes Quay and Schlosser 
          data as well.  According to my records:
          Public:
          All of P6 (E,C,W)
                
01/19/99  P06E    Willey       CFCs           Submitted
          I just ftp'd our cfc files to the /INCOMING/RFine_cfcs directory.  The 
          files named *.sea are hydro files with our final cfc values and quality 
          bytes merged in.  The files named *_cfcs.dat are files that include 
          station, cast, bottle, cfcs and quality bytes.
          
          EXPOCODE        31WTTUNES/2     WHP-ID  P17S,P16S
          EXPOCODE        31WTTUNES/1     WHP-ID  P17C
          EXPOCODE        316N138/12      WHP-ID  P19C
          EXPOCODE        318MWEST_4_5    WHP-ID P21E/W
          EXPOCODE        316N138/3       WHP-ID  P6E
          
          Each file looks fine and has been placed in the proper archived directory 
          on our machine so that they can be merged in with the rest of the values. 
          -Steve Diggs
              
02/16/99  P06E    Diggs        CFCs           Website Updated: Data OnLine 
          P06E (316N138/3) CFCs have been updated/merged with the bottle data file. A
          ll tables and associated files have been updated as well.
              
                
WOCE DATA PROCESSING NOTES

DATE      LEGS    CONTACT      DATA TYPE      DATA STATUS  SUMMARY
--------  ------  -----------  -------------  ---------------------
04/29/99  P06CEW  Quay         DELC13         Data Requested by dmb
          My name is Danie Bartolacci, and I'm a programmer/analyst working for both the
          WHPO and Lynne Talley.  I'm trying to track down information about C-13 
          measurements taken for some WOCE Pacific lines.  I've recently corresponded
          with Bob Key who directed me to you.
          
          My understanding from Bob is that processing of C-13 for these lines is 
          finished.  Is it possible to obtain the data and/or an update on their status  
          for the following cruise lines?  Any information you can provide would be 
          greatly appreciated!  Thank you for your time!
          
          P16N- McNichol 
          P17C- McNichol 
          P16S17S- McNichol
          P16C- Quay
          P14C- McNichol
          P6E,C,W- McNichol
          P16A17A- McNichol
          P17E19S- McNichol/Rau
          P19C- McNichol/Rau
          P10- McNichol
          P17N- Quay/McNichol
          P13- Quay/McNichol
          P18- Quay/McNichol
          P14S15S- Quay
          S04P- McNichol
              
10/20/99  P06E    Willey       CFCs           Final Data Submitted
          This is a follow-up to last month's message requesting that all of our Pacific 
          and Indian Ocean CFCs be made accessible to the public.  Our cruises are; 
          (Pacific) P17C, P1716S, P06E, P19C, P17N, P21E, and (Indian) I09N, I05W/I04, I07N, I10. 
              
03/07/00  P06C    Saunders     CTD/BTL/SUM    Data Update: Correct # is 111
          Only 111 stations reported in summary file, bottle file, ctd stations
          Station numbers in above range from 75 to 188 so you might imagine 114 stations 
          occupied. (Cruise report says 113 but this is obvious error of counting). 
          However stations 112,141,187 have been discarded - hence number is 111 as all 
          files agree.  So perhaps you might change 133 to 111.
              
05/10/00  P06CEW  Key          DELC14         Update Needed: only half the data submitted
          The C-14 section captures most of the features for P6, however, I think that you 
          only have about half the data. The details of how this could happen are too long 
          to worry about, but it is probably my fault. I have attached an ascii file with 
          all of the results.
          
          One problem is that the current hydro file at WHPO does not include data for 
          station 3. Early versions of the sea file included stations 1-3, but these 
          locations were re-sampled and subsequently 1-3 declared "test". As early as 
          1995 I lobbied to get station 3 data added back into the official files, and 
          it was for awhile. When the far eastern portion of the secion was re-sampled, 
          some of the tracers which had been sampled originally were not re-collected. 
          The reasons varied. With respect to C-14, cutting station 3 is equivalent to 
          discarding ~10K worth of analyses and it creates a very important hole in the
          section. The problem is less severe (due to sampling density) for carbon 
          parameters, but it exists. I do not know the whether or not H-3 was collected 
          on any of station 1-3.
          
          I found no glaring problems with the bottle data from station 3 and think that 
          the C-14 data alone justifies keeping this station in the official WOCE data file.
          
          When the section is remade, it is important that the contour labels be attached 
          to the C-14 minimum around 2300m at the eastern end of the section. The fact that 
          the minimum is segregated into eastern and western lobes is one of the most important 
          results from the deep Pacific radiocarbon program. I also believe that the deep/
          abyssal relative max around 102W is real and probably indicative of a weak western 
          boundary flow along the flank of the ridge.
          
          WHPO: I have ftp'ed a copy of the attached file to your INCOMING directory
          called P6-C-14.dat
              
                
WOCE DATA PROCESSING NOTES

DATE      LEGS    CONTACT      DATA TYPE      DATA STATUS  SUMMARY
--------  ------  -----------  -------------  ---------------------
05/31/00  P06E    Talley       CFCs           Data Update: Quality flags updated
          I updated the bottle quality flags in p06ehy.txt as per Rana Fine's email today. 
          I placed the file in the ftp on whpo.ucsd.edu in my subdirectory TALLEY. Please 
          acknowledge receipt and that the file online has been replaced by the edited file.
          
05/31/00  P06E    Willey       CFCs           Update Needed (Quality flags)
          looking at P6E cfcs again, we have a couple of changes to make to P6E quality bytes. 
          They are listed below.  Please make these changes to your current file.
          P06E (CFCs):

           stn  cast  sampno  press    cfc     val     QB (change from 2 to)
          ------------------------------------------------------------------
            36   1      32    154.3   cfc12  1.324      3
            70   1      26    423.3   cfc11  2.319      3
              
08/24/00  P06CEW  Kozyr           CO2  Final Data Submitted (TCO2  PCO2  PCO2TMP)
          I have put the long waited and finally released by Doug Wallace final CO2-related 
          data files for the Pacific Ocean WOCE Sections P6E, P6C, and P6W to the WHPO ftp 
          INCOMING area. 
              
09/14/00  P06C    Anfuso       DELC14         Website Updated: Data OnLine 
          (delc14, c14err)
          Merged C14 data into hyd file. Merging notes in subdir original/2000.05.10_P06_C14_KEY. 
          Updated hyd file is on-line.
              
09/20/00  P06CEW  Bartolacci   TCARBN/PCO2    Data Public, Filed, Ready to be Merged
          I have moved all three legs of P06 CO2 data into the parent P06 original directory. 
          Data (TCARBN, and PC02, PCO2TEMP) were sent by Alex Kozyr on 2000.08.24. Email 
          accompanies data in /onetime/p06/original/2000.08.24_P06_ALL_LEGS_CO2_KOZYR. Data 
          are public and have not yet been merged. "to merge" table has been updated to 
          reflect this.
              
09/29/00  P06E    Uribe        BTL            Data Update  "new" btl file submitted 
          Moved files p06ehy.txt and changes from ftp-incoming.2000.02.14/.  changes is a text 
          file that has comments on several bottle files, p06ehy.txt is one of them.  File was 
          received November 11, 1999.  Data appears to be the same as the one online, except the 
          online data has an older time stamp than the file. The website stamp is 19990216WHPOSIOSCD. 
          The file has a time stamp of 19991129WHPOSIODMN. According to Website, all data for 
          this cruise is public.  Path is p06/p06e/original/1999.11.30_PO6_BOTTLE_DMN.
              
09/14/00  P06C    Anfuso       DELC14         Website Updated: Data online 
          Merged C14 data into hyd file. Merging notes in subdir original/2000.05.10_P06_C14_KEY. 
            Updated hyd file is on-line.
          All C14 data/notes for P06 legs p06c, p06e, p06w came in one dir. from Bob Key 
            (2000.05.10_P06_All_LEGS_C14_KEY).This data dir. was copied to each cruise leg 
            subdir.  The edited data file, p06_c14_edt.dat, was reformatted and prepared 
            for merging, then copied into each cruise subdir.  NOTE:  One entry in this 
            file was erroneous.  The entry had a station value of b2532.  I reviewed the 
            bottle data file and determined this was meant to be station 32, cast 1, 
            sample 25; edited this entry for merging. Also, the Key data file header 
            reports the file format is station, cast, bottle....; This format does not  
            match the bottle file format.  C14 data was merged as station, cast, sample....
          
10/03/00  P06EW   Anfuso       DELC14         Website Updated: Data online 
          (delc14, c14err)
          Merged delC14 and C14err data into hyd file. Updated hyd file was put on line. 
            Merging notes in original subdir 2000.05.10_P06_C14_KEY.
          All C14 data/notes for P06 legs p06c, p06e, p06w came in one dir. from Bob Key 
            (2000.05.10_P06_All_LEGS_C14_KEY).This data dir. was copied to each cruise leg 
            subdir.  The edited data file, p06_c14_edt.dat, was reformatted and prepared 
            for merging, then copied into each cruise subdir.  NOTE:  One entry in this 
            file was erroneous.  The entry had a station value of b2532.  I reviewed the 
            bottle data file and determined this was meant to be station 32, cast 1, 
            sample 25; edited this entry for merging. Also, the Key data file header 
            reports the file format is station, cast, bottle....; This format does not  
            match the bottle file format.  C14 data was merged as station, cast, sample....
          Specific notes on p06e: Some c14 data existed in the hyd file before merging.  
            This data matched the data to be merged (except it wasn't a complete data set, 
            only partial).  Data existed on stations 17,24,44,54,69.Merged new data over 
            existing data.
          Specific merging notes for p06w: There was some existing C14 data in the 
            previous hyd file version.  This data is the same as the updated Bob Key data 
            to be merged, however it was not a complete data set.  Merged new c14 data 
            over existing data.  Preexisting data was for 
            stations:194,205,210,214,229,234,239.
              
                
          
WOCE DATA PROCESSING NOTES

DATE      LEGS    CONTACT      DATA TYPE      DATA STATUS  SUMMARY
--------  ------  -----------  -------------  ---------------------
10/04/00  P06CW   Anfuso       TCARBN/PCO2    Website Updated  Data online
          (tcarbn, pco2)
          Merged TCARBN and PCO2 data into hyd file. Updated hyd file is on line. Merging 
            notes in original subdir 2000.08.24_P06_CO2_KOZYR.
          A. Kozyr data for p06c, p06w, p06e were placed together in the original subdir
            2000.08.24_P06_ALL_LEGS_CO2_KOZY.  Copied each data set to related p06 subdir for merging.
          Specific notes for merging TCARBN and PCO2 on p06c:  After merging data, noticed missing 
            data was in format -9.0.  Extracted TCARBN and PCO2 data columns and substituted -9.0 
            with -999.0 (seemed more appropriate).  Remerged.
            Specific notes on merging TCARBN and PCO2 on p06e:  After merging data, had to
              extract all values from hyd file and convert previously existing missing data
              values from -9.0 (flag1) to -999.0 (flag9). Remerged.
          Specific notes on TCARBN & PCO2 merging in p06w: hyd file had preexisting -9.0 values 
            for missing data.  Had to merge Kozyr data, then extract all data, replace -9.0 values 
            with -999.0 and remerge.  Extracted and edited file called alldata_edt.dat.
              
10/25/00  P06CEW  Anfuso       PCO2TMP        Website Updated: Data online 
          Merged PCO2TMP data from A. KOZYR into hyd file. Updated hyd file is on-line.
              
11/27/00  P06CEW  Uribe        Cruise Report  Submitted; found in 'sum file' 
          File contained here is a CRUISE SUMMARY and NOT sumfile. Documentation is online.
          2000.10.11 KJU
          Files were found in incoming directory under whp_reports. This directory was zipped, 
            files were separated and placed under proper cruise. All of them are sum files.
          Received 1997 August 15th.
              
11/29/00  P06CEW  Kappa        Cruise Report  PDF & ASCII Versions Updated
              
12/08/00  P06CEW  Huynh        Cruise Report  Website Updated
          pdf, txt versions online
              
01/08/01  P06CEW  Stuart       DELC13         Submitted, public
          STUART, DANA would like the data PUBLIC.
          
          Sorry about excluding the headers... should have included them in the body of the last 
            message.  Here they are:
              Lab ID (WHOI  NOSAMS = 1,  U-Wash/Quay = 3
              WOCE line/WHPID
              Station
              Cast
              Niskin
              del-C13 value
              del-C13 Quality Flag
          Please also note for those P6 files that the default value is -9, for those which do 
            not have a REAL C13 value.
              
06/22/01  P06CEW  Uribe        CTD/BTL        Website Updated: Exchange File online
          CTD and Bottle files in exchange format have been put online.
              
06/27/01  P06E    Wisegarver   CFCs           DQE Complete: precision issues
          The precision of CFC-12 for p06e was estimated at 3%, outside the original standards 
            for precision, but within the relaxed standards (3% or 0.015 pmol/kg overall precison).
              
08/23/01  P06W    Bartolacci   CTD            Website Updated: exchange file online
          I have edited the header information of the Exchange CTD files in order to conform with 
            the new header variables decided by WHPO. Previous exchange CTD has been moved to 
            original directory and new zipped file has been linked.
              
                
          
WOCE DATA PROCESSING NOTES

DATE      LEGS    CONTACT      DATA TYPE      DATA STATUS  SUMMARY
--------  ------  -----------  -------------  ---------------------
08/28/01  P06E    Swift        SUM            Update Needed: "suspicious longitudes"
          I was looking through the P06E .sum file and found a couple of suspicious longitudes.

          1.  Station 7. The present .sum records for Stations 6-8:
              316N138_3  P06E       6       1  ROS 050492 2107   BE  32 30.01 S  71 49.97 W
              316N138_3  P06E       6       1  ROS 050492 2157   BO  32 30.34 S  71 50.14 W
              316N138_3  P06E       7       1  ROS 050592 0108   BE  32 29.45 S  71 59.91 W
              316N138_3  P06E       7       1  ROS 050592 0200   BO  32 29.58 S  71 01.22 W
              316N138_3  P06E       8       1  ROS 050592 0558   BE  32 29.95 S  72 10.29 W
              316N138_3  P06E       8       1  ROS 050592 0653   BO  32 29.83 S  72 11.18 W
                         The corrected Station 7 "BO" almost certainly should be:
              316N138_3  P06E       7       1  ROS 050592 0200   BO  32 29.58 S  72 01.22 W
              Please verify that.

          2.  Station 32.  The suspect erroneous longitude record is more subtle than for 
                Station 7.  But I think Station 32 has one or more longitude errors. Here is the 
                present version:
              316N138_3  P06E      31       1  ROS 051292 1604   BE  32 29.83 S  85 20.03 W
              316N138_3  P06E      31       1  ROS 051292 1720   BO  32 30.18 S  85 19.99 W
              316N138_3  P06E      32       1  ROS 051292 2258   BE  32 29.79 S  86 19.73 W
              316N138_3  P06E      32       1  ROS 051392 0002   BO  32 30.06 S  86 33.00 W
              316N138_3  P06E      33       1  ROS 051392 0520   BE  32 30.02 S  86 40.00 W
              316N138_3  P06E      33       1  ROS 051392 0634   BO  32 30.81 S  86 40.38 W
          I cannot tell for certain what the error is, but I think there is one. Can you please 
            check the navigation files and advise? The WHPO will make the necessary changes to 
            the .sum file (& WHP-Exchange files) on receipt of your reply.
              
08/29/01  P06E    Dunworth     CTD/BTL/SUM    Submitted
          Data submitted to ensure WHPO has the most recent data
          I have a copy of an email dated Oct 6, 1998 from Maggie Cook to Lynne Talley where  she 
            lists all the corrections to the p6 summary files.  

          They are:        sta   7  end pos     should be -72 01.22
                           sta   9 strt pos                32 28.73
                           sta 115 strt pos                32 29.97
                           sta  32  all pos                86 00.00
                           sta  55 strt pos               101 20.11
                           sta  91  end pos               123 59.85
                           sta 165  end pos                32 29.35
          and to the data: sta 156 salt at 3db  should be  35.5652.

          Maggie also had some concern as to whether the "latest and greatest" data was at SIO-WOCE. 
            Jim, I still have copies of Maggies "latest and greatest", in case you want them.
              
09/19/01  P06CEW  Muus         CTD            Data Update Needed
          I was looking at Jane Dunworth-Baker's Aug 29, 2001, message and her comment "sta 156 
            salt at 3db should be 35.5652" appears to be referring to CTD data not Bottle data.
          The shallowest bottle on 156 is 23.7db. CTD salt at 3db is now 38.5652.
          So this will be a correction not connected with the anticipated CFC merging.  
              
09/20/01  P06CW   Dunworth     CTD/BTL/SUM    Submitted: Final Data
          I just 'put' p6c.tar.Z and p6w.tar.Z in the INCOMING directory at whpo.ucsd.edu.
              
                
          
WOCE DATA PROCESSING NOTES

DATE      LEGS    CONTACT      DATA TYPE      DATA STATUS  SUMMARY
--------  ------  -----------  -------------  ---------------------
09/25/01  P06CEW  Muus         CFCs/SUM       Website Updated: Data reformatted, online

          NOTES ON P06C CFC MERGING SEPT 25, 2001.  D. Muus
            1. New CFC-11 and CFC-12 from:
                 /usr/export/html-public/data/onetime/pacific/p06/p06c/original/ 
                 20010709_CFC_WISEGARVER_P06C/20010709.185231_WISEGARVER_P06C_p06c_CFC_DQE.dat 
               merged into SEA file taken from web Aug 20, 2001 
               (20010326WHPOSIOKJU)
            
               All "1"s in QUALT1 changed to "9"s and QUALT2 replaced by new QUALT1 prior to merging. 
                 DQE recommendatations for Bottle, Salts, Oxygen and Nutrient appear to have been 
                 made to QUALT1 word. Web QUALT2 word has many "1"s including BTLNBR QUALT2 code. 
            2.  SUM file: Changed Sta 91 Cast 1 BO Longitude from 122 59.85 to 123 59.85.     
                                         165  BO Latitude from   32 39.35 to 32 29.35.
               Per Jane Dunworth-Baker message of August 29, 2001.
                 Removed "^Z" from end of file.
            3. Exchange file checked using Java Ocean Atlas. 
                            
          NOTES ON P06E CFC MERGING SEPT 25, 2001.  D. Muus
            1. New CFC-11 and CFC-12 from:
                 /usr/export/html-public/data/onetime/pacific/p06/p06e/original/ 
                   20010709_CFC_WISEGARVER_P06E/20010709.185349_WISEGARVER_P06E_p06e_CFC_DQE.dat 
                   merged into SEA file taken from web Aug 20, 2001  (20001024WHPOSIOSRA)
               All "1"s in QUALT1 changed to "9"s and QUALT2 replaced by new QUALT1 prior to merging. 
                 DQE recommendatations for Bottle, Salts, Oxygen and Nutrient appear to have been 
                 made to QUALT1 word. Web QUALT2 word has many "1"s including BTLNBR QUALT2 code. 
            2. SUM file: Changed Station 7 Cast 1 BO Longitude from 71 01.22 to 72 01.22.     
                                             32  BE Longitude from 86 19.73 to 86 00.00.
                                             32  BO Longitude from 86 33.00 to 86 00.00.
                                             55  BE Latitude from 101 30.11 to 101 20.11.
               Per Jane Dunworth-Baker message of August 29, 2001.
               Removed "^M"s from end of .SUM file lines. Removed "^Z" from end of .SUM file..
            3. Exchange file checked using Java Ocean Atlas. 
             
          NOTES ON P06W CFC MERGING SEPT 24, 2001.  D. Muus
            1. New CFC-11 and CFC-12 from:
                 /usr/export/html-public/data/onetime/pacific/p06/p06w/original/ 
                  20010709_CFC_WISEGARVER_P06W/20010709.170933_WISEGARVER_P06W_p06w_CFC_DQE.dat 
               merged into SEA file taken from web Aug 20, 2001 
               (20010326WHPOSIOKJU)
            
               All "1"s in QUALT1 changed to "9"s and QUALT2 replaced by new QUALT1 prior to merging. 
                 DQE recommendatations for Bottle, Salts, Oxygen and Nutrient appear to have been 
                 made to QUALT1 word. Web QUALT2 word has many "1"s including BTLNBR QUALT2 code.  
            2. SUM file: Removed "^M"s from end of lines.     Removed "^Z"from end of file.
                 Moved "LATITUDE" and "LONGITUDE" headers to be left justified with data.
            3. Exchange file checked using Java Ocean Atlas.
              
10/01/01  P06CEW  Kappa        Cruise Report  PDF & ASCII Versions Updated
          added all figs, data processing notes, cfc dqe report
              
10/18/01  P06CEW  Uribe        Cruise Report  Website Updated
          Documentation for this cruise has been updated.
          
10/18/01  P06CW   Wisegarver   CFCs           DQE Report Submitted
          concentrations have been adjusted to the SIO98 calibration Scale
              
                
          
WOCE DATA PROCESSING NOTES

DATE      LEGS    CONTACT      DATA TYPE      DATA STATUS  SUMMARY
--------  ------  -----------  -------------  ---------------------
11/01/01  P06CEW  Jennings-Jr  NITRIT         Update Needed
          I pulled the stripcharts for the P6 stations that Lynne had questions about.  We did, 
            indeed, have some problems with wandering baselines at a few stations and what appears 
            to be a consistent leaking bottle at several others. The apparently leaking Niskin #24 
            was located at a depth at which there was a strong gradient in the other nutrients, so 
            the leak is not readily apparent except as a persistent small nitrite peak at ca 1000 - 
            1200 db.

          Station(s)      Problem
          101, 103, 104   Non-linear baseline meander
          150, 154 - 159  Small real NO2 peak, always at Niskin 24 at 1000 - 1200 db (36 bottle 
                          rosette)
          167             Bottle 24 definitely a leaker. Other nitrite values from bottles 
                          22 - 36 affected by a baseline meander.
          193             This high nitrite was due to a fluke computer problem. The value should 
                          be 0.003 vs 0.32.  (Don't know if it's better to flag or change this datum.)

          I would agree with Lynne that she should "zero them out" for the purposes of her plot(s), 
            and we should ask her to flag them in the WHPO data set.
              
11/07/01  P06E    Muus         BTL/SUM        Data Question: needs dqe comments
          P6 Station 3 data from Bob Key, Oct 31, 2001, is in the odf.ucsd.edu anonymous ftp site:
            jswift/P6Sta3/p06esu.txt     (Complete p06e SUM file with additional Sta3 info)
                         /p6eSt3hy.txt   (.SEA file for Station 3 only)
                         /p6eSt3_hy1.csv (Exchange file for Station 3 only)
          for anyone needing the data now. QUALT2 word is identical to QUALT1 so if anyone has any 
            dqe type comments please let me know. I hope to included Station 3 in the next P06E 
            version after the other problems are resolved.
              
11/12/01  P06E    Diggs        CTD/BTL/SUM    Submitted
          P06E files submitted by Jane Dunworth-Baker (2001.09) were located in obsolete ftp 
            INCOMING directory under a different name. Dave Muus is in the process of checking 
            whether or not these new files are of better quality than the ones we have online. 
            New CSL files were a part of this  package.
              
01/04/02  P06CE   Uribe        CTD            Website Updated: Exchange File online
          CTD has been converted to exchange using the new code and put online.
              
01/17/02  P06CE   Hajrasuliha  CTD            Internal DQE completed
          created .ps files, check with gs viewer.  Created *check.txt file.
              
03/05/02  P06C    Bartolacci   CFCs           DQE comments submitted
          The documentation file on P06C DQEd CFC data was submitted separately and later than 
            the actual data. Data has already been merged by D. Muus. However DQE comments file 
            was now moved to the P06C directory containing the CFC data submitted by Wisegarver 
            on 2001.07.09
          ..../pacific/p06/p06c/original/20010709_CFC_WISEGARVER_P06C
              
03/07/02  P06E    Muus         CO2            Website Updated: Data online
          Notes on P06E  merging     Mar 7, 2002  D.Muus
            1. Merged TCARBN, PCO2 and PCO2TMP from: http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/ftp/ndp077/p6e.dat 
               into bottle file from web (20010925WHPOSIODM) per Alex Kozyr message Feb 27, 2002.
            2. Missing value indicators changed from -999.9 to =9.0. 
            3. No QUALT2 given so used QUALT1 codes for QUALT2.                
            4. Made new exchange file for Bottle data.
            5. Checked new bottle file with Java Ocean Atlas.
              
04/03/02  P06E    Talley       TCARBN         Data Question: values low; flag "2"?
          Alex, Dave and others:
            We are doing the last checks on the P6 sections, and have found a bullseye in total 
              carbon at the following sample from P06E:
                12       1      28 02-9545   250.9      9.5478  34.5545  30.5     9.5196  34.2819
               229.7     2.65    5.06          0.09     0.81    -9.000   -9.000  -9.000   -9.0000
              -999.00   -9.000  -9.0000       -9.00  -999.0     -9.0   2054.1    -9.000   -9.000
              -999.0    -9.0 322444444999999299 32244444499999929
          So someone flagged the bottle itself as questionable, and nutrients were then flagged as 
            bad, but for some reason, bottle salinity, oxygen and total carbon have been given flags 
            of 2.  The TCARBN value at this bottle is quite low compared with the adjacent bottles. 
            I haven't checked the CTD salinity profile to see if it's terribly contorted here, so 
            that the sample might actually be OK.
          We are going to remove it from the vertical section since the bottle quality is 3. 
            However, is this what you want us to do?  And if so, then the value should be flagged 
            in the online data set.
              
                
          
WOCE DATA PROCESSING NOTES

DATE      LEGS    CONTACT      DATA TYPE      DATA STATUS  SUMMARY
--------  ------  -----------  -------------  ---------------------
04/03/02  P06E    Kozyr        TCARBN         Data Update Needed: Qual flags wrong
          I have checked the flags at WHPO site against my data flags for CO2 data for P6E section 
            and found that flags at WHPO are wrong. Please use the data and flags for this cruise 
            from my data set at:   
              http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/ftp/ndp077/p6e.dat
          
05/09/02  P06CEW  Jenkins      He/Tr          Update Needed: Some wrong values online
          I'm looking at the data that is on the WHPO web site (at least a version of it that was 
            on there earlier this year, please let me know if this is ok). I'm finding that there 
            seems to be data in the file that actually shouldn't be there. I believe these were 
            failed analyses that somehow got included in my data submission, whenever that was. 
            For that, I apologize!
          Fortunately, these spurious data points have a clear signature: they have a zero (and 
            hence unphysical) helium concentration value. Thus any delhe3 would naturally be 
            undefined anyway. You can eliminate these points by selecting only those delhe3 
            values that have non-zero helium.
          Unfortunately, there is a bunch of them (45 to be exact). Below is a list of the spurious 
            points :
                       STNNBR CASTNO SAMPNO CTDPRS HELIUM DELHE3 NEON
                         35     1      27    307.5    0     0    -999
                         45     1      27    258.7    0     0    -999
                         45     1      16   1112.4    0     0    -999
                         49     1      28    254.1    0     0    -999
                         53     1      20    800.4    0     0    -999
                         59     1      21    652.8    0     0    -999
                         85     1      18   1063.9    0     0    -999
                         97     1      19   1614.6    0     0    -999
                        103     1      36     18.7    0     0    -999
                        109     1       4   1515.1    0     0    -999
                        109     1       3   1713.2    0     0    -999
                        109     1       2   1904.2    0     0    -999
                        115     1      36     23.6    0     0    -999
                        115     1      25    712.9    0     0    -999
                        115     1      24    812.1    0     0    -999
                        115     1      20   1217      0     0    -999
                        115     1      17   1615.6    0     0    -999
                        120     1      21   1192.7    0     0    -999
                        120     1      19   1581.2    0     0    -999
                        134     1      34    112.3    0     0    -999
                        134     1      31    262.6    0     0   7.664
                        139     1      30    318.1    0     0    -999
                        139     1      22   1216      0     0    -999
                        150     1      31    318.5    0     0    -999
                        150     1      21   1416.6    0     0    -999
                        172     1      36     21.4    0     0    -999
                        172     1      34    109      0     0    -999
                        172     1      32    305.2    0     0    -999
                        176     1      23   1514.6    0     0    -999
                        186     1      36     19.1    0     0    -999
                        186     1      35     59.3    0     0    -999
                        186     1      34    109.7    0     0    -999
                        186     1      32    207.4    0     0    -999
                        186     1      31    302.4    0     0    -999
                        186     1      30    400.1    0     0    -999
                        186     1      29    501      0     0    -999
                        186     1      28    601.9    0     0    -999
                        186     1      27    702.6    0     0    -999
                        186     1      19   1506      0     0    -999
                        209     1       8    297.5    0     0    -999
                        227     1      22    794.6    0     0    -999
                        234     1      35     27.9    0     0    -999
                        237     1      29    502.1    0     0    -999
                        237     1      16   1803.4    0     0    -999
                        240     1      23    783.2    0     0     -99
               
                
          
WOCE DATA PROCESSING NOTES

DATE      LEGS    CONTACT      DATA TYPE      DATA STATUS  SUMMARY
--------  ------  -----------  -------------  ---------------------
05/20/02  P06E    Muus         He/Tr/CO2      Website Updated: Data online
          Merged Tritium, TCarbon, and PCO2 into web bottle file. Made some Helium data 
            corrections and described some unresolved data problems.
          
          Notes on P06E merging     May 16, 2002    D. Muus
          1. Merged Tritium from: 
               http://www.soc.soton.ac.uk/soes/staff/wjj/p06trits.txt
             And  TCARBN, PCO2 and PCO2TMP from:
               http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/ftp/ndp077/p6e.dat
             into bottle file from web (20010925WHPOSIODM)
               (Missing value indicators changed from -999.9 to -9.0.)
          2. QUALT2 same as QUALT1 for all merged values. 
          3. Tritium merge "Bottle" # in data set to SAMPNO in WOCE bottle file.
          4. Added Station 3 data per Lynne Talley and Bob Key. Original documentation says 
             Sta 3 was test cast for backup CTD #9 and ctd data not processed. But C14 samples 
             taken and analyzed so data are included. 
          5. Changed Station 63, Cast 1  
                      HELIUM from  1.9920 to   -9.0000 
                      DELHE3 from 24.71   to -999.00
                      HELIER from  0.0040 to   -9.0000
                      DELHER from  0.15  to    -9.00 
                     and HELIUM & DELHE3 quality flags 1 & 2 from 2 to 9.
             Value from deepest bottle on Station 62 had been used for all  samples on Station 63, 
               but no samples had been collected from Station 63 per Bill Jenkins and Lynne Talley
               (msg Oct 31. 2001)
          6. Per Lynne Talley message of May 9, 2002, Subj: p6 helium.
                      HELIUM changed from 0.0000 to   -9.0000,  
                      DELHE3 changed from 0.00   to -999.00,    
                      DELHER changed from  .15   to   -9.00 and 
             quality flags changed from 2 to 9 on following samples:
                      STA CA SMP
                       35  1  27
                       45  1  27 & 16
                       49  1  28
                       53  1  20
                       59  1  21
          7. Examples of P06 sample identification problems. Other, similar, problems also found. 
             No exhaustive search made.
                      STA CA SMP  Comments
                       20  1  25  ok
                       24         Sal, Oxy & Nuts ok; CFC, Trit, Tcarb look like deep samples. 
                                  Trit pressure given as 4085 vs. 604db
                       23         Trit different level than other data.  
                       22         Smooth Sal, Oxy, Nuts, bump in He & Neon, may be ok.
                       21         Sal, Oxy & Nuts same as SMP 21 at 803.7db, other samples different.
                       20         See SMP 21.
                       19         ok
                       18         ok
                       17         Sal, Oxy & Nuts same as SMP 16 at 1104.6db, only other sample 
                                  from both bottles, TCARBN are different.
                       16         See SMP 17.
                        1         See SMP 24.
         
             Following from P06E Station 20:   S:  WHPOSIO  New web version 20020516WHPOSIODM
             W:  WHPOWHOI Latest WHOI version, received Aug. 2001
             T:  Tritium  Tritium data set March 2002
             C:  CFC      CFC data set July 2001
             STA CA SMP    BTL  CTDPRS  CTDTMP  SALNTY OXYG   SIL   NO3    NO2   P04   CFC11  CFC12  TRIT   HELIUM  DELHE3  TCARBN   NEON
             
             S: 20  1 25 02-9455   501.6  6.0127 34.3138 188.2  14.04 29.21  0.00  2.05  1.133  0.560  0.160  1.8500    0.37  2178.1  7.926
             W: 20  1 25 02-9455   501.6  6.0127 34.3138 188.2  14.04 29.21  0.00  2.05  1.277  0.558  0.166  1.8500    0.37    -     7.926
             T: 20  1  -      25   501    6.0141 34.3138   -      -     -     -     -     -      -     0.1596   -        -      -       -
             C: 20  1 25      -9   501.6    -       -      -      -     -     -     -    1.133  0.560    -      -        -      -       -
             
             S: 20  1 24     123   604.1  5.2879 34.2778 216.7  15.38 28.48  0.00  2.00  0.000  0.000  0.001 -9.0000 -999.00  2302.4 -9.000
             W: 20  1 24     123   604.1  5.2879 34.2729 216.7  15.38 28.48  0.00  2.00  0.000  0.000  0.002 -9.0000  -99.00    -    -9.000
             T: 20  1  -      24  4085    1.6119 34.6920   -      -     -     -     -     -      -     0.0009   -        -      -       -
             C: 20  1 24      -9   604.1    -       -      -     -      -     -     -    0.000  0.000 (qualtity flags = 4)
             
             S: 20  1 23     128   651.0  5.0585 34.2677 215.0  17.39 28.98  0.00  2.02  0.957  0.444  0.153  1.8530    0.65  2167.8  7.964
             W: 20  1 23     128   651.0  5.0585 34.2677 215.0  17.39 28.98  0.00  2.02  1.089  0.444  0.159  1.8530    0.65    -     7.964
             T: 20  1  -      23   603    5.2892 34.2778   -      -     -     -     -     -      -     0.1535   -        -      -       - 
             C: 20  1 23      -9   651.0    -       -      -      -     -     -     -    0.957  0.444    -      -        -      -       - 
             
             S: 20  1 22     121   701.2  4.8476 34.2705 215.7  17.39 28.92  0.00  2.03  0.836  0.440 -9.000  1.8700    0.83  2170.4  8.045
             W: 20  1 22     121   701.2  4.8476 34.2705 215.7  17.39 28.92  0.00  2.03  0.939  0.438  0.155  1.8700    0.83    -     8.045
             T: 20  1  -      22    -9   -9.0000 -9.0000   -      -     -     -     -     -      -    -9.000    -        -      -       -   
             C: 20  1 22      -9   701.2    -       -      -      -     -     -     -    0.836  0.440    -      -        -      -       -
             
             S: 20  1 21     120   803.7  4.3129 34.3190 173.9  34.42 33.50  0.00  2.36  0.849  0.423  0.131  1.8570    0.85  2171.4  7.988
             W: 20  1 21     120   803.7  4.3129 34.3190 173.9  34.42 33.50  0.00  2.36  0.949  0.419  0.136  1.8570    0.85    -     7.988
             T: 20  1  -      21   701    4.8488 34.2705   -     -     -      -     -     -      -     0.1310   -        -      -       - 
             C: 20  1 21      -9   803.7    -       -      -     -      -     -     -    0.849  0.423    -      -        -      -       -
             
             S: 20  1 20     133   803.7  4.3129 34.3187 174.8  34.42 33.50  0.00  2.36  0.176  0.109  0.043  1.8760    3.79  2205.9  8.099
             W: 20  1 20     133   803.7  4.3129 34.3187 174.8  34.42 33.50  0.00  2.36  0.198  0.108  0.036  1.8760    3.79    -     8.099
             T: 20  1  -      20   803    4.3139 34.3190   -      -     -     -     -      -     -     0.0432   -        -      -       - 
             C: 20  1 20      -9   803.7    -       -      -      -     -     -     -    0.176  0.109    -      -        -      -       -
             
             S: 20  1 19     118   953.8  3.8421 34.4096 133.6  55.30 37.24  0.00  2.65  0.177  0.102 -9.000 -9.0000 -999.00  2206.6 -9.000
             W: 20  1 19     118   953.8  3.8421 34.4096 133.6  55.30 37.24  0.00  2.65  0.197  0.101 -9.000 -9.0000  -99.00    -    -9.000
             T: 20  1  -       -
             C: 20  1 19      -9   953.8    -       -      -      -     -     -     -    0.177  0.102    -      -        -      -       - 
             
             S: 20  1 18     117  1002.8  3.6956 34.4359 124.4  62.31 37.93  0.00  2.71 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000  1.9500    9.01  2254.5  8.321
             W: 20  1 18     117  1002.8  3.6956 34.4359 124.4  62.31 37.93  0.00  2.71 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000  1.9500    9.01    -     8.321
             T: 20  1  -       -
             C: 20  1 18      -9  1002.8    -       -      -     -      -     -     -   -9.000 -9.000    -       -       -      -       -  
             
             S: 20  1 17     116  1104.6  3.4872 34.4815 115.4  73.33 38.73  0.00  2.77 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000 -9.0000 -999.00  2267.4 -9.000
             W: 20  1 17     116  1104.6  3.4872 34.4815 115.4  73.33 38.73  0.00  2.77 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000 -9.0000  -99.00    -    -9.000
             T: 20  1  -       -
             C: 20  1 17      -9  1104.6    -       -      -     -      -     -     -   -9.000 -9.000    -       -       -      -       - 
             
             S: 20  1 16     115  1104.6  3.4872 34.4809 115.8  73.17 38.67  0.00  2.76 -9.000 -9.000  0.002  1.9300   13.99  2283.5  8.203
             W: 20  1 16     115  1104.6  3.4872 34.4809 115.8  73.17 38.67  0.00  2.76 -9.000 -9.000  0.002  1.9300   13.99    -     8.203
             T: 20  1  -      16  1104    3.4880 34.4815   -     -     -      -     -     -      -     0.0016   -        -      -       -
             C: 20  1 16      -9  1104.6    -       -      -     -      -     -     -   -9.000 -9.000    -       -       -      -       - 
             
             
             S: 20  1 15     114  1204.6  3.3058 34.5217 109.5  82.85 38.95  0.00  2.79 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000 -9.0000 -999.00  2282.9 -9.000
             W: 20  1 15     114  1204.6  3.3058 34.5217 109.5  82.85 38.95  0.00  2.79 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000 -9.0000  -99.00    -    -9.000
             T: 20  1  -       -
             C: 20  1 15      -9  1204.6    -       -      -     -      -     -     -   -9.000 -9.000    -       -       -      -       -  
             
             S: 20  1  1     132  4083.7  1.6115 34.6920 168.2 124.20 34.22  0.00  2.42 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000 -9.0000 -999.00  2302.7 -9.000
             W: 20  1  1     132  4083.7  1.6115 34.6920 168.2 124.20 34.22  0.00  2.42 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000 -9.0000  -99.00    -    -9.000
             T: 20  -  1      -     -
             C: 20  1  1      -9  4083.7    -       -      -     -      -     -     -   -9.000 -9.000    -       -       -      -       -  
             
             T: 20  1  -      24  4085    1.6119 34.6920   -     -      -     -     -     -      -     0.0009   -        -      -       -

          8. Made new exchange file for Bottle data.
          9. Checked new bottle file with Java Ocean Atlas.
          
                
          
WOCE DATA PROCESSING NOTES

DATE      LEGS    CONTACT      DATA TYPE      DATA STATUS  SUMMARY
--------  ------  -----------  -------------  ---------------------
05/20/02  P06W    Muus         NO2/He/Tr  Website Updated: Data online
          Notes on P06W merging     May 18, 2002    D. Muus

          1. Merged Tritium from: 
               http://www.soc.soton.ac.uk/soes/staff/wjj/p06trits.txt
               into current web bottle file (20010924WHPOSIODM).

             Following two tritium samples do not have matching bottle data:
               %Sta Ca Btl Dup Pres Temp   Salinity SigmaTheta Tritium SigTrit Lat   Long  Flag
               196  1  36  0    27 18.8738 35.7197 25.6060    0.7516  0.0049 -30.08 174.00  2
               224  1   1  1  1626 2.7037  34.6193 27.6179   -0.0002  0.0022 -30.08 160.00  2

          2. QUALT2 same as QUALT1 for all merged values. 

          3. Changed NO2 value per Joe Jennings Nov 1, 2001, message to Lou Gordon with Arnold 
             Mantyla (DQE) comments.
             Sta 193 Ca 1 Sample 1 (4310.1db) NO2 value 0.00 vs. 0.32. QCs remain 2.

          4. Per Lynne Talley message of May 9, 2002, Subj: p6 helium.
               HELIUM changed from 0.0000 to   -9.0000,  
               DELHE3 changed from 0.00   to -999.00,    
               DELHER changed from  .15   to   -9.00 and 
             quality flags changed from 2 to 9 on following samples:
               Sta Ca Samples
               209  1 8
               227  1 22
               234  1 35
               237  1 29 & 16 
               240  1 23

          5. Made new exchange file for Bottle data.

          6. Checked new bottle file with Java Ocean Atlas.
          
05/20/02  P06C    Muus         NO2/He/Tr      Website Updated: Data online
          Notes on P06C merging     May 16, 2002    D. Muus

          1. Merged Tritium from: 
               http://www.soc.soton.ac.uk/soes/staff/wjj/p06trits.txt
               into current web bottle file (20010925WHPOSIODM).

          2. QUALT2 same as QUALT1 for all merged values. 

          3. Changed NO2 Quality Codes per Joe Jennings Nov 1, 2001, message to Lou Gordon with 
             Arnold Mantyla (DQE) comments.

                    Sta 101 Ca 1 Samples 12 through 5  (535.3-1107.9db) QCs 3 vs. 2
                    Sta 103 Ca 1 Samples 30 through 22  (258.4-759.9db) QCs 3 vs. 2
                    Sta 104 Ca 1 Samples 26 through 10 (458.0-2785.5db) QCs 3 vs. 2
                    Sta 150 Ca 1 Sample 24 (1011.4db) QCs 3 vs. 2
                    Sta 155 Ca 1 Sample 24 (1015.0db) QCs 3 vs. 2
                    Sta 156 Ca 1 Sample 24 (1200.2db) QCs 3 vs. 2
                    Sta 157 Ca 1 Sample 24 (1099.5db) QCs 3 vs. 2
                    Sta 158 Ca 1 Sample 24 (1303.1db) QCS 3 vs. 2
                    Sta 159 Ca 1 Sample 24 (1213.4db) QCs 3 vs. 2
                    Sta 167 Ca 1 Sample 24 (5866.6db) QCs 3 vs. 2
                    Sta 167 Ca 1 Samples 25, 23 & 22 (1013.2-1419.0db) QCs 3 vs. 2

          4. Per Lynne Talley message of May 9, 2002, Subj: p6 helium.
               HELIUM changed from 0.0000 to   -9.0000,  
               DELHE3 changed from 0.00   to -999.00,    
               DELHER changed from  .15   to   -9.00 and 
               quality flags changed from 2 to 9 on following samples:
                    Sta Ca Samples
                    85  1 18
                    97  1 19
                    103  1 36
                    109  1 4, 3, & 2
                    115  1 36, 25, 24, 20, & 17
                    120  1 21 & 19
                    134  1 34 & 31
                    139  1 30 & 22
                    150  1 31 & 21
                    172  1 36, 34 & 32
                    176  1 23
                    186  1 36, 35, 34, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27 & 19

          5. Made new exchange file for Bottle data.

          6. Checked new bottle file with Java Ocean Atlas.
              
                
          
WOCE DATA PROCESSING NOTES

DATE      LEGS    CONTACT      DATA TYPE      DATA STATUS  SUMMARY
--------  ------  -----------  -------------  ---------------------
02/19/03  P06W    Muus         DELC13         Website Updated  Data merged into online BTL file  
          Notes on P06C         Feb. 19, 2003      D. Muus

          1. Merged DELC13 from:                                                
               /usr/export/html-public/data/onetime/pacific/p06/original/
               2001.01.22_DSTUART_P06_C13.DIR/whpo_p6c.txt
             into current web bottle data file 20020516WHPOSIODM

          2. Original DELC13 data file (whpo.p6c.txt) had following inconsistent 
             data entries:
                    Lab    WHPID    Sta    Ca    Niskin    del-c13 flag
                    1       P06C    140     1       20      0.255   9
                    1       P06C    140     1       34      1.201   9
                    1       P06C    133     1       30      -9      3
             The Station 140 values look good so changed flag from 9 to 3.
             Changed flag for 133/1/30 from 3 to 9.

          3. Made new exchange file for Bottle data.

          4. Checked new bottle file with Java Ocean Atlas.
          
02/19/03  P06C                 Muus  DELC13   Website Updated  Data online 
          BTL file  Notes on P06C         Feb. 19, 2003      D. Muus

          1. Merged DELC13 from:                                                
               /usr/export/html-public/data/onetime/pacific/p06/original/
               2001.01.22_DSTUART_P06_C13.DIR/whpo_p6c.txt
             into current web bottle data file 20020516WHPOSIODM

          2. Original DELC13 data file (whpo.p6c.txt) had following inconsistent 
             data entries:
                    Lab    WHPID    Sta    Ca    Niskin    del-c13 flag
                    1       P06C    140     1       20      0.255   9
                    1       P06C    140     1       34      1.201   9
                    1       P06C    133     1       30      -9      3
             The Station 140 values look good so changed flag from 9 to 3.
             Changed flag for 133/1/30 from 3 to 9.

          3. Made new exchange file for Bottle data.

          4. Checked new bottle file with Java Ocean Atlas.
              
09/11/04  P06CEW  Aoyama       NUTs           Data Question: What are units?
          I am a PI of nutrients analysis on R/V Mirai BEAGLE cruise in 2003-2004 which revisited 
            P06, A10, I03 and I04.  I saw the temporal variation of nutrients on these regions, 
            then I found a large decrease of nutrients concentration in the Pacific sector. It 
            reminds me of a part of the cruise report as shown below. 
          I wonder that the concentration is stated in the unit of micro mol per kilogram in the 
            data file.  However, the data originator may have submitted in micro mol per liter and 
            nobody converted them to micro mol per kilogram. If so, the big difference I found 
            becomes relatively reasonable because P06 data becomes ca. 1/1.026. 
          Can you be track the nutrients data from the beginning? Do you have the paper version of 
            data of P06? Or, would you let me know contact address of  Dr. Joe Jennings who was a 
            PI of nutrients data on P06?
              
11/29/04  P06W    Jennings-Jr  NUTs           Data units confirmed
          I dug out the original P6 data and can verify that the data on the WHPO website ARE in 
            the stated units of micromoles per kilogram.
          I pulled one station from each leg at random and in all cases, the phosphate, silicate, 
            and nitrate concentations given in the WHPO site are approximately 97.56% of our original 
            data. This is consistent with the conversion from micromoles per liter to micromoles per 
            kilogram.
              
05/05/05  P06CEW  Kappa        Cruise Report  Updated PDF & Text Docs
          1) Expanded these Data Processing Notes
          2) Reformatted first page
          3) Added Hyperlink Bookmarks to PDF doc
          

