A. CRUISE NARRATIVE: P02E A.1. HIGHLIGHTS WHP CRUISE SUMMARY INFORMATION WOCE section designation P02E Expedition designation (EXPOCODE) 492SSY9310_1-2 Chief Scientist/affiliation Tamotsu Bando/MSA* Dates 1993.OCT.14 - 1993.NOV.27 Ship S/V Shoyo Ports of call Leg 1: Tokyo, Japan to Honolulu, USA Leg 2: Honolulu, USA to San Diego, USA 32 58.2' N Geographic boundaries 155 5.1' E 117 33.1' W 29 59.4' N Number of stations 131 Floats and drifters deployed unknown Moorings deployed or recovered unknown Contributing Authors H. Yoritaka *CHIEF SCIENTIST ~ Hydrograpic Department ~ Maritime Safety Agency Tsukiji 5-3-1 ~ Chuo-ku ~ Tokyo 104 ~ Japan CONTACT PERSON ~ Hiroyuki Yoritaka ~ Ocean Research Department Japan Marine Science and Technology Center Natsushima-cho 2-15 ~ Yokosuka 237 ~ JAPAN Phone: +81-468-66-3811 ext.357 ~ Fax: +81-468-65-3202 E-mail: yoritaka@jamstec.go.jp A.2 CRUISE SUMMARY P02 was composed of four different cruises which were carried out during the period from October 14, 1993 to November 14, 1994 utilizing three different observation ships. No large volume sampling was carried out. Most of the observation line is located on 30N. But west of 134.5 E, the line goes northwest toward Cape Ashizuri along the PCM5 line. Also, east of 123W the line bends northeast to avoid Mexican territory. Two of the four cruise were intended to get high-quality CTD data on high density observation stations. For example, the shortest interval between stations is 30 nautical miles around some topographic features, with small volume water sampling for nutrient analysis (Salinity, Dissolved oxygen, Silicate, Phosphate, Nitrate, [Nitrite] and pH). These two cruises compose the central and eastern part of P02, and the western most part of P02, respectively. The first cruise began on 14 October 1993 and the latter began on the 15th of January, 1994. The third cruise was to get nutrient and chemical tracers data (Freon, Total Carbon, Tritium, Radioactive carbon/sampling only, pC02) mainly at 32 depths with CTD-ROSSETE 101 system. This cruise started on the 7th January, 1994. The fourth and final cruise, which measured ctd data as well as discreet salinity and oxygen data, began on November 1, 1994. Standards for nutrient is controlled by PIs among these three cruises. Standards used for these cruise were re-standardized at Scripps institution of Oceanography in the course of first cruise. A.3. LIST OF PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS |Principal | Parameter |Investigator(s) |Affiliation ----------------------|-----------------|------------------------------------------------ CTD02/rosette |Masao Fukasawa |School of Marine Science, Tokai University |Ichiro Yasuda |Tohoku Regional Fisheries Research Laboratory |Hiroyuki Yoritaka|Hydrographic Department, MSA T,S |Hiroyuki Yoritaka|Hydrographic Department, MSA 02 |Yoshihisa Kato |School of Marine Science, Tokai University |Katsumi Yokouchi |Tohoku Regional Fisheries Research Laboratory N03, NO2, NH4 |Hiromi Kasai |Hokkaido Regional Fisheries Research Laboratory P04, SiO2 |Chizuru Saito |National Institute for Environmental Studies 3H, 14C, CFC |Yutaka Watanabe |National Institute for Resources and Environment Sig.C02/pH/Alkali/pCO2|Tsuneo Ono |Faculty of Fisheries, Hokkaido University T (underway), ADCP |Ichiro Yasuda |Tohoku Regional Fisheries Research Laboratory S (underway) |Masao Fukasawa |School of Marine Science, Tokai University XBT |Hiroyuki Yoritaka|Hydrographic Department, MSA Moorings |Masao Fukasawa |School of Marine Science, Tokai University Surface Drifters |Yutaka Michida |Hydrographic Department, MSA A.4. Scientific Goals To get reliable dataset to estimate meridional transport of physical and chemical mass across 30N. Especially, at relatively shallow depths, the zonal transport of total carbon and CFCs included in NPIW-corresponding layer and NPSTMW are object to be estimated. Also heat and fresh water (and/or salinity) fluxes across 30N are subject to be estimated. From 1991, WOCE-like observation programmes have been carried out along 32.5 N by the Hydrographic Department, Maritime Safety Agency and School of Marine Science, Tokai University. In these programmes current variations were checked by current meter moorings around the Shatsky Rise. Also, nutrient variations were examined through 5 different cruises. Results from these programmes show that eddies which are associated with the Shatsky Rise give so large effects on oceanic conditions around the region. The variation of nutrient profiles excess 20% of their mean structure at the intermediate depth in magnitude. In P02 cross section, we encounter three large topographic features, the Shatsky Rise, the Emperor Seamount and the Hess Rise. As explained in foregoing section, same P02 line will be repeated twice within three months. This strategy of operation will help us to know some standard errors in estimated fluxes through information about time-dependent oceanic structures. A.5. CRUISE TRACK AND STATIONS P2 line, along 30N in the North Pacific, consists of four cruises and includes 178 stations. P02E occupied the stations from 155 5'E to eastern boundary of the Pacific. A total of 131 CTD/rosette stations were occupied using a GO 24 bottle rossete sampler with 23 1.2-liter Niskin bottles, and a NBIS Mk IIIB CTD equipped with Benthos altimeter. SAMPLING The water sample measurement were made for salinity, oxygen, phosphate, silicate and nitrate+nitrite. The sampling depths in db were 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900, 1000, 1250, 1500, 1750, 2000, 2250, 2500, 3000, 3500, 4000, 4500, 5000, 5500 and 6000. A.3 LIST OF PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS List of parameters to be measured and the Principal Investigator(s) for each is as follows; Parameter Principal Investigator(s) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- CTDO/rosette Masao Fukasawa School of Marine Science, Tokai University Ichiro Yasuda Tohoku Regional Fisheries Research Institute Hiroyuki Yoritaka Hydrographic Department, MSA Salinity Hiroyuki Yoritaka Hydrographic Department, MSA Oxygen Katsumi Yokouchi Tohoku Regional Fisheries Research Institute Nutrients Chizuru Saito National Institute for Environmental Studies ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- A.4 LIST OF CRUISE PARTICIPANTS Cruise participants and their responsibilities are as follows: Tamotsu Bando HD, MSA Chief Scientist, CTD, S, O2 Yoshiyuki Iwanaga HD, MSA PO4, SiO2 Hiroyuki Yoritaka HD, MSA CTD, S, O2 Naoki Konishi HD, MSA PO4, SiO2 Masaharu Namiki HD, MSA CTD, PO4, SiO2, pCO2 Masao Fukasawa Tokai Univ. CTD, S, O2 Masahisa Oyaizu Tokai Univ. NO3 Mamoru Tamaki Tokai Univ. NO3 Ken-ichi Amaike Tokai Univ. NO3 Hideki Kinoshita Tohoku Univ. O2 C HYDROGRAPHIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES AND CALIBRATIONS C.1 SAMPLE WATER SALINITY MEASUREMENTS (H. Yoritaka) November 1996 SALINITY SAMPLE COLLECTION The bottles in which the salinity samples are collected and stored are 125 ml brown glass bottles with rubber plugs. Each bottles were rinsed three times and filled with sample water. Salinity samples were stored for about 24 hours in the same laboratory as the salinity measurement was made. INSTRUMENTS AND METHOD The salinity analysis was carried out by a Guildline Autosal salinometer model 8400A. After three times rinse with sample water, double conductivity ratio were measured at fourth and fifth time. If difference between fourth time and fifth time was more than 0.00003 in double ratio, one more measurement was carried out at sixth time. The salinometer was operated in the air-conditioned ship's laboratory at a bath temperature of 24 deg. C. An ambient temperature varied from approximately 22 to 24 deg. C., and repeated rapid lowering and slow rising. STANDARD SEA WATER Autosal model 8400A was standardized only before sequence of measurements for each leg, using IAPSO Standard Seawater batch P123. After the standardization, 8400A was monitored with SSW ampoules at every two stations. There was drift in monitoring of SSW, so correction was carried out for sample measurements as follows: Leg 1 Station 035-066: Corrected Double Ratio = Measured Double Ratio -0.00005 Station 067-096: Corrected Double Ratio = Measured Double Ratio +0.00008 Leg 2 Station 097-107: Corrected Double Ratio = Measured Double Ratio -0.00000 Station 108-145: Corrected Double Ratio = Measured Double Ratio +0.00012 Station 146-165: Corrected Double Ratio = Measured Double Ratio -0.00002 Duplicate and Replicate Samples Duplicate samples were drawn in the deeper layers in case of shallower water depth than 5000 m. Replicate samples were drawn from three or four Niskin bottles in every station. Standard deviation in the measurements of duplicate and replicate samples were as follows: Duplicate All 0.0023 psu 126 pairs >=3000 db 0.0017 psu 81 pairs Replicate 0.0014 psu 465 pairs. C.2 CTD Measurements (Hiroyuki Yoritaka) November 1996 EQUIPMENT, CALIBRATIONS AND STANDARDS 1. Neil Brown Mk.IIIB CTD with FSI titanium pressure sensor, Beckman oxygen sensor and Benthos altimeter. Identification S/N 1194 and 1216. 2. General Oceanics 1.2 liter 24 bottle rosette sampler. 3. Eight sets of SIS digital reversing thermometers and digital reversing pressure meters. The shipboard equipment included the following major units: 1. EG&G deck unit data terminal. Model 1401. 2. NEC PC-9801DA. 3. GO rosette firing module. The data was backed up in DAT cassette data recorder. Laboratory calibration of the Mk.IIIB CTD temperature and pressure sensors was carried out as follows; Pre-Cruise Post-Cruise #1194 WHOI (September 1993) SEA Co. (January 1994) #1216 SEA Co. (October 1993) SEA Co. (January 1994) According to the pre-calibration dataset (Table 3.1), temperature was corrected by following equation. Tcorrected=Traw+a0+a1*Traw+a2*Traw^2+a3*Traw^3+a4*Traw^4 #1194 #1216 a0: +0.0011235 -0.00085089 a1: -0.00049007 -0.00029946 a2: +5.4001E-05 -2.5199E-05 a3: -2.2491E-06 +1.6767E-06 a4: +3.2474E-08 -2.9987E-08 Table 3.1. Pre-cruise temperature calibration in unit of degrees Celsius. #1194 Standard Temp. Standard-CTD 0.9121 +0.0011 7.4305 -0.0005 15.0790 0.0000 22.6401 -0.0001 30.4018 -0.0008 #1216 Standard Temp. Standard-CTD 1.0092 -0.0012 4.9896 -0.0027 10.1407 -0.0052 15.2387 -0.0068 20.0647 -0.0084 25.0394 -0.0096 Table 3.2. Post-cruise temperature calibration. #1194 Standard Temp. Standard-CTD 0.1341 +0.0057 2.5326 +0.0051 5.0047 +0.0043 10.0860 +0.0037 12.5178 +0.0037 14.9969 +0.0040 17.6101 +0.0042 19.9477 +0.0043 24.9453 +0.0048 #1216 Standard Temp. Standard-CTD 0.9992 -0.0011 1.9995 -0.0015 2.9986 -0.0017 3.9981 -0.0018 4.9985 -0.0020 5.9971 -0.0025 6.9977 -0.0028 7.9974 -0.0031 8.9972 -0.0032 9.9950 -0.0036 10.9962 -0.0042 11.9952 -0.0046 12.9944 -0.0047 13.9946 -0.0054 15.1495 -0.0051 20.0740 -0.0078 25.0014 -0.0066 29.8740 -0.0088 From the pre- and post-cruise temperature calibrations, temperature sensor errors during the cruise are estimated to be within 0.001C for 0-8C, within 0.002C for >8C on #1216. On #1194, there were 0.004C differences between pre- and post-cruise calibrations. Differences in temperature between CTD and digital reversing thermometer of the deepest layer over the cruise showed #01-1194 was 0.002C lower in temperature than #01-1216. It was consistent with pre-cruise calibration. Only one titanium pressure sensor (S/N 1333) was used over the cruise, while CTD was changed. According to the pre-calibration dataset (Table 3.3), pressure was also corrected by following equation. Pcorrected=Praw+a0+a1*Praw+a2*Praw^2+a3*Praw^3+a4*Praw^4-Pdeck a0: 0.039722 a1: -0.0017326 a2: 4.6731E-07 a3: -6.5441E-11 a4: 3.5102E-15 In the six times down/up calibration (up to 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000 db), there were differences between down-cast and up-cast within 0.5 db, so pressure at up-cast was corrected by equation same as down-cast. Table 3.3. Pre-cruise pressure calibration in unit of deci-bar. #1333 Standard Pres. Standard-CTD 0.0 0.0 98.0 -0.1 293.9 -0.4 489.9 -0.7 979.7 -1.3 1959.5 -2.0 2939.2 -2.4 3918.9 -2.7 4898.7 -2.9 5878.4 -3.1 Table 3.4. Post-cruise pressure calibration in unit of deci-bar. #1333 Standard Pres. Standard-CTD 0.0 0.0 98.0 0.1 293.9 -0.5 489.9 -0.9 979.7 -1.8 1959.4 -2.8 2939.1 -3.9 3918.8 -4.4 4898.5 -4.9 5878.1 -5.7 From the pre- and post-cruise temperature calibrations, pressure sensor errors during the cruise are estimated to be 2.6 dbar at 6000 dbar depth. EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE CTD Both oxygen sensors on #1194 and #1216 were out of condition. So we change CTD twice for maintenance of oxygen sensor, after station 041 and 74. But they did not recovered. At station 156, data from CTD #1194 included noise, so we change CTD for #1216. Summary of employment for CTD is as follows; Station 035-041: #1194 Station 042-074: #1216 Station 075-156: #1194 Station 157-165: #1216 Another external sensors, pressure sensor and altimeter were in good condition. C.3 CTD DATA PROCESSING The data processing procedure was as follows: (1) Noise removal (2) P and T data correction by laboratory calibration (3) Time lag filtration for T data for adjusting to C sensor response (4) C data correction for sensor modification (5) Time lag filtration for P and C data for adjusting to T sensor response (6) Pressure averaging (7) C data correction by water sampling data (8) Pressure centering (1) Noise removal Firstly, we perform first difference check in which if a data value jumps more than a certain critical value, the data was marked and interpolated. The critical values are 1.0 dbar in pressure, 0.02 degree in temperature and 0.02 mmho/cm in conductivity. (2) P and T data correction by laboratory calibration Pressure and temperature correction by laboratory calibration were carried out as mentioned in session 3.2. (3) Time lag filtration for T data for adjusting to C sensor response From lowering speed of CTD, T data was filtered for adjusting to C sensor response as follows; Tfiltered(t)=exp(-dt/tauc)*Tfiltered(t-dt)+(1-exp(-dt/tauc))*Traw(t) where dt means CTD sampling interval (1/25 sec.), tauc means response time of C sensor. Response time of C sensor was read from Giles and McDougall (1986), the method was following Kawabe and Kawasaki (1993). (4) C data correction for sensor modification According to SCOR Working Group (1988), C data was corrected for alumina sensor as follows; Ccorrected=Craw*(1-6.5E-06*(T-2.8)+1.5E-08*(P-3000)) (5) Time lag filtration for P and C data for adjusting to T sensor response P and C data was filtered for adjusting to T sensor response as follows; Pfiltered(t)=exp(-dt/tau)*Pfiltered(t-dt)+(1-exp(-dt/tau))*Praw(t) Cfiltered(t)=exp(-dt/tau)*Cfiltered(t-dt)+(1-exp(-dt/tau))*Craw(t) where dt means CTD sampling interval (1/25 sec.), tau means response time of T sensor. Response time of T sensor was estimated from maximum lagged correlation between T data series and C data series as follows; #1194: 8/25 sec. (320 msec) #1216: 5/25 sec. (200 msec) (6) Pressure averaging P, T and C data were removed at upward moving at down- cast, and were averaged over (+/-)1 dbar range. (7) C data correction by water sampling data Conductivity data was calibrated by comparison with sample salinity. We compared all CTD conductivity data averaged over 64 data (2.56 seconds) with those of water samples which was converted from salinity with temperature and pressure at the points bottles closed just after collection of 64 CTD data. We fitted a linear regression equation of Csample = a0+a1*Cctd with minimizing RMS. error. The water sample data whose values are most different from Cctd are rejected. This rejection and fitting procedure is repeated until all data are within 0.003 mmho/cm. By using the CTD salinity determined with the cell factors determined by the above procedure, we again compared the CTD salinity and sample salinity. In this process, we detected bottle leak, miss-fire bottles and bottles taken at different depth. With the information of bottle rearrangements and rejection of questionable sample data, we again determined the cell factor as Station 035-041(#1194): a0=-0.020073 a1=1.0007220 Station 042-074(#1216): a0=+0.010755 a1=0.9998601 Station 075-096(#1194): a0=-0.022169 a1=1.0007604 Station 097-156(#1194): a0=-0.016253 a1=1.0005141 Station 157-165(#1216): a0=+0.004395 a1=1.0000042 With the cell factor determined by the above procedure, mean difference between CTD and water sample and standard deviations for depth ranges in the deep part are in the Table 3.5, Table 3.5. Depth Range Mean Salinity Difference Standard Deviation (dbar) Sctd - Ssample (psu) (psu) --------------------------------------------------------- 50-200 +0.00055 0.00836 300-700 -0.00077 0.00471 800-1500 +0.00072 0.00340 1750-3000 +0.00090 0.00269 3500-6000 +0.00018 0.00206 (8) Pressure centering For uniform pressure series, P, T and S data were interpolated. WHPO DATA PROCESSING NOTES: Date Contact Data Type Data Status Summary 08/30/98 Talley BTL Data Update: quality flags added; formatting updated 10/19/98 Thompson DELC14 No Data Submitted Masao Fukasawa/Tokai Univ. needs help processing C14 data 04/13/99 Talley SUM Data Update see note: Steve - I placed corrected versions of p02csu.txt and p02esu.txt in my ftp area at whpo. Please replace the online versions with these (and acknowledge). (What did I change - replaced P02C in the P02E file with P02E, replaced P02W in the P02C file with P02C). Lynne 04/14/99 Talley CTD Data Update see note: station 119 on p2e was corrupted. It was sent in a 1 dbar series, unlike all of the other stations. I decimated it to 2 dbar, changed the number of records in the header to match the 2 dbar series, and ftped it to the whpo site. 04/15/99 Bartolacci SUM Data Update see note: I've replaced all of the p02.sum files (p02w, p02e, p02c) and updated the table to reflect this. In the case of p02c and p02e the sum file changes (via Lynne)were correcting the occurrances of the old line number designation with the new line number designation, and (by me) replacing the slashes in the expocode to underscores. (See Lynne's emails below) IN the case of p02w the .sum file changes made (by Lynne) were converting decimal degrees into degrees and minutes in the lats and lons; the time was converted to GMT; station no. now has place holding zeros; cast type was changed from CTD to ROS; and height above bottom, wire out, and no. of bottles columns were also added. This conversion has shifted columns, however I ran sumchk on it with no errors. Slashes in the expocode were also replaced by underscores. I have also replaced the corrupted P2E119.WCT file with Lynne's updated version, and updated the table to reflect this. The table was also corrected to reflect the *bottle* data file being encrypted, NOT the .sum file (previously the table indicated the .sum file was Non- public and the bottle file was public). 09/19/00 Michida BTL Data Update With regard to the hydrographic data collected by Japanese groups, I found that the present status of availability of the data for P02E and P02W appeared as 'NP' in the listings of WHPO web site. I believe they should be ready to be made public. Have you had any contact to or from Mr Yoritaka, the present contact person for both lines? I will be pleased to ask him to confirm that the data are to be public, if necessary. 10/02/00 Fukasawa NUTs/CFCs Data Update NUTs sent to WHOI, CFCs not collected As for P2C and E, nutrients data were collected and Dr. Saito, who is the PI, reported me that data was submitted to WHOI. PI of CFCs is Dr. Watanabe although CFC data were note collected on neither P2C nor P2E. 02/21/01 Diggs NUTs Submitted silcat, no2 no3, phspht I received P02C/E nutrients as well from Saito, and just reformatted them and placed them in the original directories for each line. I'll have Stacy merge them in. 03/09/01 Yoritaka CTD/BTL Data are Public database updated as requested, see note: I would like to consent to open Bottle_S/O2 and CTD data on P2E and P2W to the public as PI. Then, would you please change some information on the summarized table of WHP one time cruises on web as follows: P02E; CS: Bando/JODC -> Bando/(HD)MSA Ship: SYOYO -> SHOYO 04/03/01 Bartolacci BTL Website Updated Files Unencrypted except NUTs; See note: I have unencrypted the bottle file for both legs of this cruise, however the nutrients still reside in the original directory and are not yet merged into the bottle file. Sarilee, Could you possibly merge these nutrients into the on-line bottle file? They're in the 'original' directory for P02E. 04/03/01 Saito NUTs Data are Public I heard from Yoritaka-san that P2E nutrient data have not yet public, then I would agree with these data will be public. 04/04/01 Michida NUTs Data are Public Today I heard that Dr. Saito, the PI for nutrient data of P2, sent an email to someone concerned in SIO (Lynne Talley? ) to make the data public. I hope things go well in this regard. 07/17/01 Diggs BTL/SUM Website Updated new P02e files on-line SUM file reformatted SUM, Bottle: (silcat, no2 no3, phspht) I have put all of the new P02e files on-line (with nutrients) at Lynne Talley's request. I have also attached Sarilee's reformatting note (kinda long). Sarilee also reformatted the SUM file and I have put it out on the website as well. 12/03/01 Diggs CTD/BTL Website Updated CSV File Added, see note: BOTTLE converted to exchange format and placed files online. CTD still non-public? 12/06/01 Diggs CTD/BTL/SUM Website Updated Files reformatted and online, see note: I have put all of the new P02e files on-line (with nutrients). I have attached Sarilee's reformatting note (kinda long). Sarilee also reformatted the SUM file and put it out on the website as well. thanks, -sd ----> Merged the nutrients into the .sea files for P02E. The nutrient file had two sta. 35. When I compared the pressures of the second sta. 35 in the nutrient file with the pressures for sta. 36 in the .sea it was obvious that the station designation in the nutrient file should have been 36. Ditto above only for sta. 105. Should have been 106 in the nutrient file. There were numerous levels throughout the file that had 0 as the sample and/or bottle number. These levels had no data and were not in the .sea file and were not merged into the .sea file. Stas. 36 and 37 had at 5501.1 and 5500.5 respectively a value of 972.51 for SILCAT and 9.73 for PHSPHT. The QUALT1 flag was 9 for each of them. These are impossible values for these parameters so I changed the values to -9.00. Sta. 40 at 1000.0db had 99 for QUALT1 flags but a value of 113.91 for SILCAT and 9.73 for PHSPHT. Changed PHSPHT value to -9.00, SILCAT value is reasonable. Changed QUALT1 flags to 39. List of stations where QUALT1 flags were not consistent with the data. I changed them so they agree with the data. NOTE - most of the QUALT1 flags in the nutrient file were 3, so I used 3 when changing Q1 codes, except in one case where the data were obviously bad. Leg 1 Sta. Press. Orig. Q1 New Q1 46 797.7 993 933 53 1748.5 399 393 54 698.1 399 393 60 50.9 993 933 66 999.2 399 393 72 1000.1 399 393 75 2250.8 999 939 81 399.5 999 939 81 5001.4 999 939 82 3000.9 999 939 83 2999.7 399 393 84 2500.8 999 939 85 1999.5 999 939 85 2497.6 999 939 86 2501.2 999 939 89 2499.5 999 939 90 1499.5 949 449 91 2500.6 999 939 95 2250.3 999 939 94 2248.5 999 939 96 1999.5 999 939 96 2249.8 399 393 96 3999.2 999 939 Leg 2 Sta. Press. Orig. Q1 New Q1 99 799.0 999 939 101 48.2 999 939 102 4497.2 999 939 103 2495.3 999 939 105 5000.3 999 939 106 100.8 399 393 106 900.5 999 939 106 4500.0 999 939 107 2000.8 999 939 107 2498.2 999 939 107 2999.8 999 939 107 4000.0 999 939 111 1498.2 999 939 112 5000.7 999 939 114 6001.3 999 939 115 2501.8 999 939 117 601.7 399 393 117 998.2 399 393 119 2001.3 999 939 119 4001.6 999 939 120 2499.4 999 939 122 2250.0 999 939 123 4000.9 999 939 126 2497.8 999 939 126 3998.5 999 939 127 4501.6 999 939 128 48.6 999 939 128 4001.8 999 939 129 3501.4 999 939 130 1999.8 999 939 130 2248.2 999 939 130 3997.8 999 939 132 3998.9 999 939 133 2247.8 999 939 133 2503.2 999 939 133 4504.6 999 939 134 3998.5 999 939 135 3496.9 999 939 135 3500.1 999 939 136 3499.7 999 939 138 4000.6 999 939 139 4000.4 999 939 140 4001.1 999 939 141 4000.0 999 939 142 2250.2 999 939 143 3999.6 999 939 144 3999.6 999 939 145 499.1 999 939 145 3999.4 999 939 145 4003.2 999 939 146 2449.9 999 939 146 3499.4 999 939 150 3001.2 999 939 153 3498.0 999 939 158 3498.9 999 939 159 3498.9 999 939 162 203.4 399 393 163 400.3 999 939 163 704.9 999 939 13 April 2001 Sarilee Anderson 01/02/02 Diggs CTD Website Updated CSV File Added, see note: CTD files updated and slight refomatting was performed for conversion to Exchange format. P02e CTD zip archives now exclude stations from p02c. New ZIP archives of WOCE CTD and Exchange CTD formatted files are now on the website. 01/18/02 Kappa DOC Compiled PDF and Text Cruise Reports