TO VIEW PROPERLY YOU MAY NEED TO SET YOUR BROWSER'S CHARACTER ENCODING TO UNICODE 8 CRUISE REPORT: SR03_2001 (Updated SEP 2007) A. HIGHLIGHTS A.1. CRUISE SUMMARY INFORMATION Section designation SR03_2001 Expedition designation (ExpoCode) 09AR20011029 Chief scientist STEVE RINTOUL/CSIRO Dates 29 OCT 2001 - 13 DEC 2001 Ship RSV Aurora Australis Port of call Hobart, Australia 44°0.16'S Geographic boundaries 139°47.71'E 146°21.01'E 67°9.42'S Stations 135 Floats and drifters deployed 0 Moorings deployed or recovered 2 serviced, 1 deployed STEVE RINTOUL CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research Castray Esplanade Hobart, Tasmania, 7000, Australia email: steve.rintoul@csiro.au AURORA AUSTRALIS MARINE SCIENCE CRUISE AU0103, CLIVAR-SR3 TRANSECT: OCEANOGRAPHIC FIELD MEASUREMENTS and ANALYSIS MARK ROSENBERG Antarctic Climate & Ecosystems CRC STEVE RINTOUL CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research STEPHEN BRAY Antarctic Climate & Ecosystems CRC CLODAGH MOY Antarctic Climate & Ecosystems CRC NEALE JOHNSTON CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research ANTARCTIC CLIMATE & ECOSYSTEMS COOPERATIVE RESEARCH CENTRE TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 4 MARK ROSENBERG Antarctic Climate & Ecosystems CRC Private Bag 80 Hobart, Tasmania, 7005, Australia email: mark.rosenberg@utas.edu.au STEVE RINTOUL CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research Castray Esplanade Hobart, Tasmania, 7000, Australia email: steve.rintoul@csiro.au STEPHEN BRAY Antarctic Climate & Ecosystems CRC Private Bag 80 Hobart, Tasmania, 7005, Australia email: s.bray@utas.edu.au CLODAGH MOY Antarctic Climate & Ecosystems CRC Private Bag 80 Hobart, Tasmania, 7005, Australia email: clodagh.moy@utas.edu.au NEALE JOHNSTON CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research Underwood Ave Floreat, Western Australia, 6014, Australia email: neale.johnston@csiro.au Cover photos courtesy of George Cresswell (c) Cooperative Research Centre for Antarctic Climate & Ecosystems 2006 ISSN: 1833-2404 ISBN: 1-921197-02-1 November 2006 Published by the Antarctic Climate & Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, 76 pp. Aurora Australis Marine Science Cruise AU0103, CLIVAR-SR3 Transect: Oceanographic Field Measurements and Analysis CONTENTS Abstract 1 Introduction 2 Cruise itinerary and summary 3 Problems encountered 4 Field data collection methods 4.1 CTD instrumentation 4.2 Niskin bottle sampling 4.3 CTD instrument and data calibration 4.4 ADCP 4.5 Underway measurements 5 CTD and bottle data results 5.1 CTD data 5.1.1 Conductivity/salinity and temperature 5.1.2 Pressure 5.1.3 Dissolved oxygen 5.1.4 Fluorescence and transmittance 5.1.5 Conductivity signal noise 5.2 Niskin bottle data APPENDIX 1 Hydrochemistry cruise laboratory report A1.1 Salinity A1.2 Dissolved oxygen A1.3 Nutrients A1.4 General data handling A1.5 Laboratories A1.6 Temperature monitoring and control A1.7 Purified water A1.8 Additional samples analysed APPENDIX 2 Data file types and formats A2.1 CTD data A2.2 Niskin bottle data A2.3 Station information A2.4 Matlab format A2.5 WOCE data format A2.5.1 CTD 2 dbar-averaged data files A2.5.2 Bottle data files A2.5.3 Conversion of units for dissolved oxygen and nutrients A2.5.3.1 Dissolved oxygen A2.5.3.2 Nutrients A2.5.4 Station information file A2.6 ADCP data A2.7 Underway data APPENDIX 3 CFC measurements on AU0103 (CLIVAR repeat of P12) - Preliminary shipboard report A3.1 CFC sampling procedures and data processingA3.2 Analytical problems APPENDIX 4 Inter-cruise comparisons A4.1 Introduction A4.2 Salinity A4.3 Niskin bottle data A4.3.1 Dissolved oxygen A4.3.2 Phosphate A4.3.3 Nitrate+nitrite A4.3.4 Silicate References Acknowledgements TABLES Table 1: Summary of cruise itinerary Table 2: Summary of station information for cruise AU0103 Table 3: Summary of samples drawn from Niskin bottles at each station. Table 4: Summary of mooring recovery and deployment information.. Table 5: Principal investigators (*=cruise participant) for CTD water sampling programs. Table 6: Scientific personnel (cruise participants) for cruise AU0103. Table 7: Calibration coefficients and calibration dates for CTD serial numbers 1193 and 1103 (unit numbers 5 and 7 respectively) used during cruise AU0103. Table 8: Surface pressure offsets Table 9: CTD conductivity calibration coefficients.. Table 10: Station-dependent-corrected conductivity slope term (F2 + F3 . N) Table 11: CTD raw data scans deleted during data processing. Table 12: Missing data points in 2 dbar-averaged files Table 13: 2 dbar averages interpolated from surrounding 2 dbar values. Table 14: Suspect 2 dbar averages for the indicated parameters Table 15: Questionable nutrient sample values (not deleted from bottle data file). Table 16: Digital reversing protected thermometers used: serial numbers are listed. Table 17: CTD dissolved oxygen calibration coefficients APPENDIX 1 Table A1.1: Summary of IAPSO Standard Seawater (ISS) batches used for salinometer standardisations during cruise AU0103. APPENDIX 2 Table A2.1: Definition of quality flags for CTD data Table A2.2: Definition of quality flags for Niskin bottles (i.e. parameter BTLNBR in *.sea files). Table A2.3: Definition of quality flags for water samples in *.sea files APPENDIX 4 Table A4.1: Stations from each cruise used for parameter comparisons FIGURES Figure 1a and b: CTD station positions and mooring locations for cruise AU0103. Figure 2: Hull mounted ADCP 30 minute ensemble data, for (a) all data, and (b) 'on station' (i.e. ship speed ≤ 0.35 m/s) data. Figure 3: Apparent ADCP vertical current shear, calculated from uncorrected (i.e. ship speed included) ADCP velocities Figure 4a and b: Comparison between (a) CTD and underway temperature data, and (b) CTD and underway salinity data, including bestfit lines Figure 5: Conductivity ratio cbtl/ccal versus station number for cruise AU0103 Figure 6: Salinity residual (sbtl - scal) versus station number for cruise AU0103. Figure 7a and b: Salinity residual versus (a) pressure, and (b) temperature, for stations 71 to 97. Figure 7c and d: Salinity residual versus (c) pressure, and (d) temperature, for stations 114 to 125. Figure 8a and b: Comparison between digital reversing thermometers and CTD platinum temperature for cruise AU0103 Figure 9: Dissolved oxygen residual (obtl - ocal) versus station number for cruise AU0103. Figure 10: Nitrate+nitrite versus phosphate data for AU0103. Figure 11: Conductivity and temperature signal noise for CTDs 1193 and 1103. APPENDIX 4 Figure A4.1a: Meridional section of neutral density for cruise au0103 along SR3 transect, including CTD station positions. Figure A4.1b: Meridional section of neutral density for cruise au9601 along SR3 transect, including CTD station positions. Figure A4.1c: Meridional section of neutral density for cruise au9404 along SR3 transect, including CTD station positions. Figure A4.2: CTD salinity differences at the deep salinity maximum, along the SR3 transect. Differences shown for au0103-au9601, au0103-au9404, and au9601-au9404. Figure A4.3a: au0103-au9601 bottle oxygen differences on neutral density surfaces. Figure A4.3b: au0103-au9404 bottle oxygen differences on neutral density surfaces. Figure A4.3c: au9601-au9404 bottle oxygen differences on neutral density surfaces. Figure A4.4a: au0103-au9601 phosphate differences on neutral density surfaces. Figure A4.4b: au0103-au9404 phosphate differences on neutral density surfaces. Figure A4.4c: au9601-au9404 phosphate differences on neutral density surfaces. Figure A4.5a: au0103-au9601 nitrate+nitrite differences on neutral density surfaces. Figure A4.5b: au0103-au9404 nitrate+nitrite differences on neutral density surfaces. Figure A4.5c: au9601-au9404 nitrate+nitrite differences on neutral density surfaces. Figure A4.6a: au0103-au9601 silicate differences on neutral density surfaces. Figure A4.6b: au0103-au9404 silicate differences on neutral density surfaces. Figure A4.6c: au9601-au9404 silicate differences on neutral density surfaces. ABSTRACT Oceanographic measurements were conducted along CLIVAR Southern Ocean meridional repeat transect SR3 between Tasmania and Antarctica from October to December 2001. A total of 135 CTD vertical profile stations were taken, more than half to within 20 m of the bottom. Over 2200 Niskin bottle water samples were collected for the measurement of salinity, dissolved oxygen, nutrients, CFCs, CCl4, dissolved inorganic carbon, alkalinity, DMS/DMSP/DMSO, halocarbons, barium, barite, ammonia, (30Si, dissolved and particulate organic carbon, particulate silica, 15N-nitrate, 18O, 234Th, 230Th, 231Pa, primary productivity and biological parameters, using a 24 bottle rosette sampler. Near surface current data were collected using a ship mounted ADCP. Two sediment trap moorings were serviced, and a third mooring was deployed at a new location. A summary of all CTD data and data quality is presented in this report. 1. INTRODUCTION Marine science cruise AU0103 was conducted aboard the RSV Aurora Australis from October to December 2001. The major constituent of the cruise was the seventh complete occupation of the CLIVAR SR3 section south of Tasmania (Figure 1a), and the first full occupation during the southern spring. Springtime measurements had previously been made during the 1991 occupation of SR3, though not to the full station density (Rintoul and Bullister, 1999). Previous completions of the transect are summarised in Rosenberg et al. (1997). The primary scientific objectives of the CLIVAR SR3 occupation were: 1. to measure changes in water mass properties and inventories throughout the full ocean depth between Tasmania and Antarctica; 2. to estimate the transport of mass, heat and other properties south of Australia, and to compare the results to previous occupations of the WOCE SR3 line; 3. to identify mechanisms responsible for variability in ocean climate south of Australia; 4. to observe the physical and biological properties of the upper ocean during the period of the spring bloom; 5. to use repeat measurements to assess the skill of ocean and coupled models. Additional CTD profiles were taken at nine 'particle station' sites to support the biogeochemical work. Three high resolution mini sections were also completed across the Antarctic Slope Front, with an additional line of CTDs taken across a bathymetric exit trough at the northwest end of the Mertz Depression (Figure 1b). Note that intensive CTD and mooring measurements in this southern shelf region were made previously during the Mertz Polynya Experiment (Rosenberg et al., 2001). Two sediment trap moorings were serviced during the cruise, and a third sediment trap mooring was deployed at a new location (Figure 1b, Table 4). This report describes the CTD, Niskin bottle, hull mounted ADCP and underway data and data quality for this cruise. All information required for use of the data set is presented in tabular and graphical form. Publications using the cruise data set include Aoki et al.(2005a), Aoki et al. (2005b), Cardinal et al. (2005a), Cardinal et al. (2005b), Jacquet et al. (2004) and Jacquet et al. (2005). 2. CRUISE ITINERARY AND SUMMARY The ship departed Hobart on October 29th 2001, and a test CTD was done (station 1) in 1000 m of water. The SR3 transect then commenced, and 12 CTDs were completed. Note that throughout the SR3 line, double dips were taken at approximately every second or third location, not counting particle stations (Table 2). The double dipping involved taking both a shallow cast to 350 m and a full depth cast (in either order), to gain more vertical resolution for Niskin bottle samples in the upper profile. After CTD station 13 the ship moved to the west of the transect line and the first particle station was occupied at ~142°E. Four CTDs were taken, and the sediment trap mooring SAZ-B (Figure 1a) was recovered then redeployed (complete details are described in the unpublished cruise mooring report). The SR3 transect was then resumed, continuing southward towards the Antarctic shelf. En route along the transect, a further 7 particle stations were occupied (Table 2), the sediment trap mooring at SAZ-C was recovered then redeployed, a new sediment trap mooring was deployed at SAZ-F (Figure 1a), a high resolution mini transect was taken across the slope front (station 95 to 99), and a mini transect was taken across the exit trough at the northwest end of the Mertz Depression (station 101 to 104). Station 107 and 108 were taken next to the Mertz Glacier, the first in Buchanan Bay and the second to the northeast. Iceshelf water was measured, with temperatures as low as -2.04°C. Unfortunately conductivity measurements were bad for both these casts, due to instrument hardware failure. Two more mini sections were taken upstream and downstream of the exit trough (Table 2, Figure 1b), and the ninth particle station was occupied over the slope at 2500 m depth. Conditions on the way south were remarkably ice free, and on the return northward the ship detoured specifically to seek out pack ice suitable for study. Continuing on the transit north back to Hobart, 3 of the particle stations were reoccupied (Table 2). CTD station details are summarised in Table 2, while Table 3 summarises the major Niskin bottle sampling for each station. Mooring deployment and recovery details are summarised in Table 4. Principal investigators for CTD and water sampling measurements are listed in Table 5, while cruise participants are listed in Table 6. TABLE 1: SUMMARY OF CRUISE ITINERARY Expedition Designation AU0103, voyage 3 2001/2002 (cruise acronym CLIVAR) Cruise Determining Program CLIVAR SR3 section Chief Scientist Steve Rintoul (CSIRO) Ship RSV Aurora Australis Ports of Call Hobart Cruise Dates October 29th to December 13th, 2001 3. PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED • During the test cast at station 1, the top few metres of seacable frayed badly and a retermination was required. A further electric retermination was required after station 6 as water was entering the cable join. • Significant data noise was observed for the first 8 casts, and the problem was eventually traced to the CTD deck unit. The unit was replaced for station 9 onwards. • The fluorometer was powered from a separate battery pack for CTD casts up to station 108. Electrical shorts to seawater flattened the batteries during stations 6 and 8. • Near the bottom of the cast at station 13, the CTD winch was unable to haul and the package ended up sitting on the bottom for ~30 minutes in 4800 m of water. When finally retrieved, there was surprisingly little damage to the instruments beyond a mud-filled conductivity cell. It was decided that the winch drum was overfilled with wire, and after station 15 1000 m of wire were removed from the drum. At station 16, trouble was again experienced below 4000 m when attempting to haul the package. After the cast the pressure in the winch hydraulics was raised from 22 to 26 bar, which appeared to fix the problem, and there were no further hauling problems for the remainder of the cruise. • During station 30, the ship lost head repeatedly in the heavy swell, and the cast was finally abandoned at 3200 dbar, with bottles tripped on the fly during retrieval. During the cast, the CTD room shipped lots of water and a set of sample containers and filter rigs were swept out the CTD door. • The stern gantry failed during work from the stern at the time of CTD station 38 - the rack and pinion drive system could not be repaired at sea. The 2 gilsson winches were rigged via a series of blocks for pulling the gantry in and out. With this configuration, the gantry was usable for trawl deck operations on the remainder of the cruise, however 4 crew were required to drive the system. • For Niskin bottle 19, a loose lanyard prior to station 60 allowed the bottom end cap to pre-trip on many occasions. As a result, Niskin bottle samples from bottle 19 were bad for many stations prior to station 60 (details given in section 5.2). • Near the start of the cast at station 66, a single wire strand broke on the CTD wire, bunching up and jamming in the sheaf as recovery was attempted. Retermination was required. • The aft CTD winch drum was used for 'in situ pump' casts (P.I. Tom Trull). When at the bottom of the pump cast after CTD station 88, with 3500 m of wire out, a single strand broke on the wire. During the recovery, ~150 m of this broken strand had to be cut away as it bunched up at the sheaf. • The conductivity hardware on CTD serial 1193 failed during station 107. Replacement CTD serial 1103 was installed for station 109 onwards. 4. FIELD DATA COLLECTION METHODS 4.1. CTD INSTRUMENTATION General Oceanics Mark IIIC CTDs including dissolved oxygen sensor were used for the entire cruise, mounted on a 24 bottle rosette frame, together with a G.O. model 1015 24-position pylon. CTD serial 1193 was used for stations 1 to 108, and CTD serial 1103 was used for remaining stations. 10-litre Niskin bottles were used for sample collection. All bottles were G.O., with the exception of 3 NOAA bottles; one of the NOAA bottles was constructed of titanium, for low CFC blank levels. All Niskins were fitted with pre-baked neoprene o-rings and stainless steel springs (no teflon coating), again to lower CFC blank levels. A Benthos altimeter serial 142 was fitted for bottom location, and digital deep sea reversing thermometers (SIS model RTM4002X) were mounted on 3 bottles for checks of CTD temperature calibration (Table 16). A Sea Tech fluorometer, borrowed from CSIRO and rated to 6000 m, was fitted to the rosette frame for most stations up to station 108 (Table 3). This instrument was powered from a separate battery pack, also fitted to the frame. After station 108, the Antarctic Division Sea Tech fluorometer (rated to only 3000 m) was used. A Chelsea Instruments transmissometer, borrowed from CSIRO, was fitted to the frame for most stations up to station 52. The instrument was powered from the fluorometer battery pack, and data were fed through the licor channel. No good transmittance data were obtained in this configuration. Good data were however obtained after fitting the transmissometer to the CSIRO Seacat, deployed separately from the stern (B. Griffiths, pers. comm.). A CSIRO copper ion selective electrode was fitted to the frame for station 76, with data fed through the fluorometer channel (P.I. Denis Mackey, CSIRO). 4.2. NISKIN BOTTLE SAMPLING Niskin bottles were sampled for numerous chemical and biological parameters throughout the cruise. Table 3 provides a summary of the main parameters sampled at each CTD station. Repeat shallow casts were taken at every second or third location on the main SR3 transect, both to increase vertical resolution for studies focusing on the upper water column, and to provide sufficient water volume for all the samples required. Several repeat casts were taken at particle station sites, with cast depths varying according to the needs of the samples required. In general, the core CTD parameters of salinity, dissolved oxygen and nutrients (orthophosphate, total nitrate+nitrite and reactive silicate) were sampled at every SR3 location. A strict order was followed for drawing of samples from Niskin bottles, with CFC, DMS/DMSP, dissolved organic carbon, halocarbons and dissolved oxygen coming first, and biological parameters generally coming later in the order. 4.3. CTD INSTRUMENT AND DATA CALIBRATION Pre-cruise pressure, platinum temperature and pressure temperature calibrations (October 2001) were performed at the CSIRO Division of Marine Research calibration facility (Table 7). A full multi point laboratory temperature calibration was performed for the platinum temperature sensors, with points between the triple point of water and the melting point of gallium, and also including several subzero points down to ~-1.4°C. A quadratic fit to the sensor calibration data was used for CTD1193 (stations 1-108); a linear fit was used for CTD1103 (stations 109-135). Calibration of the fluorometer channel for CTD1193 was done on the ship (Table 7), giving data output in volts; the same calibration was applied to fluorescence data for CTD1103. Chlorophyll-a concentration data are required to scale these voltages to fluorescence units. Complete CTD conductivity and dissolved oxygen calibration results, derived from in situ Niskin bottle samples, are listed later in this report. Hydrochemistry laboratory methods are discussed in Appendix 1. Full details of CTD data processing and calibration techniques can be found in Appendix 2 of Rosenberg et al. (1995), with the following update to the methodology: the 10 seconds of CTD data prior to each bottle firing are averaged to form the CTD upcast burst data for use in calibration. 4.4. ADCP The hull mounted ADCP on the Aurora Australis is described in Rosenberg (unpublished report, 1999). Logging and calibration parameters are summarised as follows: ping parameters bottom track ping parameters no. of bins: 60 no. of bins: 128 bin length: 8 m bin length: 4 m pulse length: 8 m pulse length: 32 m delay: 4 m ping interval: minimum ping interval: same as profiling pings reference layer averaging: bins 8 to 20 XROT: 822 ensemble averaging duration: 3 min. (for logged data); 30 min. (for final processed data) calibration α (± standard deviation) 1+β (± standard deviation) no. of calibration sites 2.460 ± 0.575 1.0691 ± 0.011 124 Current vectors are plotted in Figure 2; the apparent vertical current shear error for different ship speed classes, discussed in Rosenberg (unpublished report, 1999), is plotted in Figure 3. 4.5. UNDERWAY MEASUREMENTS Underway data, including meteorological data, bathymetry, GPS and sea surface temperature/salinity/fluorescence, were logged to an Oracle database on the ship. All data were quality controlled by the dotzapper. For bathymetry data, a sound speed of 1463 ms-1 was used for ocean depth calculation, and the ship's draught of 7.3 m was accounted for. For more information, see the AADC (Antarctic Division Data Centre) website, and the cruise dotzapper report: Marine Science Support Data Quality Report, RSV Aurora Australis Season 2001- 2002 Voyage 3 (CLIVAR), Ruth Lawless, Antarctic Division unpublished report (at web address http://aadc-maps.aad.gov.au/metadata/mar_sci/Dz200102030.html). Underway data were dumped from the AADC website and are in the following files: 1 min. instantaneous values, text format: clivar_underway.ora 1 min. instantaneous values, matlab format: clivar_underway.mat A correction was applied to the underway sea surface temperature and salinity data, derived by comparing the underway data with CTD temperature and salinity data at 8 dbar (Figure 4). The following corrections were applied: T = 0.9943 T(dls) - 0.2361 (eqn 1) S = 0.9873 S(dls) + 0.4680 (eqn 2) for corrected underway temperature and salinity T and S respectively, and uncorrected values Tdls and Sdls. Note that in the final data set, a few underway sea surface salinity values near the start and end of the cruise appear to be suspiciously low. 5. CTD AND BOTTLE DATA RESULTS CTD and Niskin bottle data quality are discussed in this section. Full details of the CTD data processing and calibration techniques are described in Rosenberg et al. (1995). Data file formats are described in Appendix 2, and historical data comparisons are made in Appendix 4. When using the data, the following data quality tables are important: Table 14 (questionable CTD data) and Table 15 (questionable nutrient data). This was the second last cruise on the Aurora Australis where General Oceanics CTDs were still used. In late 2002, a year after the cruise, the CTD system on the ship was switched over to SeaBird 911plus instruments, with an accompanying improvement in data quality, in particular for CTD dissolved oxygen data. 5.1. CTD DATA 5.1.1. CONDUCTIVITY/SALINITY AND TEMPERATURE The conductivity calibration and equivalent salinity results for the entire cruise are plotted in Figures 5 and 6, and the derived conductivity calibration coefficients are listed in Tables 9 and 10. CTD temperature and reversing thermometer data are compared in Figures 8a and b. CTD1193 was used for stations 1 to 108. The conductivity cell used for stations 1 to 12 performed very well, with CTD salinities accurate to less than 0.002 (PSS78). The cell was damaged during station 13 when the package hit the bottom, and a different cell was fitted for stations 14 to 108. This second conductivity cell performed well for stations 14 to 29. For stations 30 to 70, a very small biasing towards a positive ∆S (where ∆S = bottle salinity - calibrated CTD salinity) is evident deeper in the water column. This biasing, mostly of the order 0.001 (PSS78), is well within the 0.002 (PSS78) salinity accuracy and therefore no correction has been made to the data. For stations 71 to 97, the positive biasing error in ∆S becomes significant (Figure 7a). The positive group of ∆S values to the lower right of Figure 7a represents data from the bottom end of CTD profiles. The depth of these values decreases southward as the bathymetry shoals, thus the biasing is not simply a pressure dependent error. The biasing does however appear simultaneously with the appearance of a locally colder fresher 'tail' of water at the bottom of each profile. The local vertical salinity gradients are steeper in these tails, and as the centre of the Niskin bottles on the rosette frame are ~0.5 m above the CTD sensors, the negative sign (i.e. freshening with depth) of the gradients would be expected to cause a small positive biasing in ∆S. Closer examination reveals that the positive ∆S values do not always correspond exactly with these local fresher tails of water, and indeed the gradients in these tails are not strong enough to account for the magnitude of the error of up to ~0.004 (PSS78) - thus these local features are only considered a minor component of the error. The major cause of the error appears to be temperature related. There is a close correspondence between the salinity residuals and subzero water temperatures at depth (Figure 7b). From the figure, there is a broad scatter in ∆S values for shallow samples (≤250 dbar in Figure 7b), however for deeper samples ∆S values are clearly positive for temperatures below 0°C. For stations 98 to 106, the conductivity calibration results are good, and no consistent biasing in ∆S is evident. The conductivity cell malfunctioned for stations 107 and 108, and no CTD conductivity/salinity data are available for these two stations. CTD1103 was used for station 109 and onwards, after failure of the conductivity hardware on CTD1193. For stations 109 to 113 and stations 126 to 135 the conductivity cell calibrated well, with CTD salinities accurate to within 0.002 (PSS78). For stations 114 to 125, a CTD salinity error similar to stations 71 to 97 (CTD1193) is evident from the positive ∆S values at depth (Figures 7c and d). There appears to be a small sensor calibration error for both CTD1103 and CTD1193 in subzero water at depth. From the available evidence it is not conclusive whether the source of the error is the temperature sensor calibrations, the conductivity cell responses, or both. Both CTDs show similar behaviour, and as there is a strong possibility that the temperature calibrations are a probable source of error, the following caution is given for both the temperature and salinity data. For stations 71 to 97 and 114 to 125 in subzero waters at depth (i.e. at the bottom end of the full depth profiles), at the local salinity and pressure values there is a possible error of the order +0.003°C (i.e. temperature a little high) for CTD temperature, and a CTD salinity error of the order -0.003 (PSS78) (i.e. salinity a little low). More specifically, the salinity error is in the range -0.001 to -0.004 (PSS78), with the larger error for lower negative temperatures. No correction has been made for these errors. For many stations the salinity data are suspect for the top 2 bins (2 and 4 dbar), due to transient errors when the instrument first enters the water. As a general caution, salinity data down to 4 dbar should be treated as suspect. As described in section 4.3, a multi point laboratory temperature calibration was performed prior to the cruise. Both linear and quadratic fits were attempted for the temperature calibration data for both CTDs, to obtain the best fit results. For CTD1193 (stations 1 to 108), a quadratic fit to the calibration data gave the best results over the entire temperature range (Table 7). For CTD1103 (stations 109 to 135), temperatures measured during these stations were mostly below ~2.3°C, with higher values up to only ~7.5°C encountered during stations 133 to 135. For this lower end of the temperature range, the best result from the laboratory temperature calibration came from a linear fit to the calibration data (Table 7). CTD platinum temperature data are compared with digital reversing thermometer data in Figures 8a and b. The offsets in results for the different thermometers are due to calibration offsets between the thermometers. At positive temperatures, CTD temperature sensor performance appears to be fairly stable throughout the cruise, and data for the two CTDs appear to be consistent. At temperatures below 0°C there is a clear decrease in (T (i.e. thermometer - CTD temperature) with decreasing temperature (Figure 8b). This same pattern is evident for both CTDs. From the comparison to the thermometer data alone, it is not clear whether the source of the error is the CTD temperature calibrations or the thermometer calibrations. Changing response of Neil Brown platinum temperature sensors below 0°C is often reported (SCRIPPS Institution of Oceanography Calibration Facility, CSIRO Calibration Facility, pers. comms). It is therefore likely that there is at least some small calibration error in the CTD temperature data in subzero water, as discussed previously in this section. TABLE 2: Summary of station information for cruise AU0103. All times are UTC. In the station naming, 'particle' refers to particle station, 'downstream' refers to downstream section, 'upstream' refers to upstream section, 'exit trough' is the bathymetric feature at the northwest end of the Mertz Depression, and 'large volume' is a cast specifically to collect a large volume of water from a single depth. | START | | BOTTOM | END Station number | time date latitude longitude depth | maxP | time latitude longitude depth altim.| time latitude longitude depth | (m) |(dbar)| (m) (m) | (m) -----------------|----------------------------------------------|------|------------------------------------------|---------------------------------- 1 test | 2104 29-OCT-01 44:07.18S 146:13.14E 995 | 1028 | 2140 44:07.30S 146:13.09E 1010 18.0 | 2221 44:07.23S 146:12.96E 997 2 SR3 | 0344 30-OCT-01 44:00.16S 146:20.09E 240 | 306 | 0400 44:00.33S 146:20.52E 302 15.0 | 0430 44:00.37S 146:21.01E 319 3 SR3 | 0609 30-OCT-01 44:03.22S 146:17.76E 556 | 522 | 0631 44:03.12S 146:17.95E 504 13.0 | 0714 44:03.17S 146:18.36E 468 4 SR3 | 0837 30-OCT-01 44:06.99S 146:13.84E 1015 | 1044 | 0902 44:06.96S 146:14.05E 1026 13.0 | 0941 44:06.64S 146:14.16E 1008 5 SR3 | 1247 30-OCT-01 44:22.15S 146:13.54E 2268 | 2312 | 1334 44:21.88S 146:13.96E 2215 11.3 | 1509 44:21.90S 146:15.07E 2187 6 SR3 | 1806 30-OCT-01 44:43.35S 146:02.71E 3151 | 3246 | 1934 44:43.18S 146:02.43E 3140 13.1 | 2116 44:42.92S 146:02.43E 3125 7 SR3 | 1630 31-OCT-01 45:13.15S 145:51.00E 2803 | 2898 | 1738 45:13.14S 145:50.34E 2808 10.2 | 1911 45:13.14S 145:49.67E 2800 8 SR3 | 0040 1-NOV-01 45:42.39S 145:39.00E 2085 | 354 | 0103 45:42.71S 145:38.91E 2125 - | 0131 45:43.06S 145:38.58E 2237 9 SR3 | 0252 1-NOV-01 45:44.02S 145:39.98E 2777 | 2876 | 0415 45:44.77S 145:40.09E 2788 15.0 | 0530 45:45.44S 145:40.21E 2791 10 SR3 | 0850 1-NOV-01 46:10.12S 145:28.44E 2669 | 2758 | 0955 46:10.45S 145:28.16E 2656 15.0 | 1124 46:10.75S 145:27.31E 2664 11 SR3 | 1532 1-NOV-01 46:38.59S 145:15.36E 3270 | 3374 | 1644 46:38.55S 145:15.60E 3251 14.5 | 1826 46:38.95S 145:14.71E 3268 12 SR3 | 2034 1-NOV-01 46:39.39S 145:14.71E 3322 | 352 | 2056 46:39.40S 145:14.78E 3329 - | 2129 46:39.61S 145:14.66E 3343 13 SR3 | 0106 2-NOV-01 47:08.88S 144:53.95E 4720 | 4900 | 0240 47:08.29S 144:53.76E - 0.0 | 0725 47:07.20S 144:53.11E - 14 particle | 0331 3-NOV-01 46:55.02S 142:02.92E 4451 | 304 | 0355 46:54.93S 142:02.87E 4455 - | 0414 46:54.87S 142:02.80E 4460 15 particle | 0829 3-NOV-01 46:55.46S 141:59.42E 4450 | 1004 | 0852 46:55.44S 141:59.48E - - | 0928 46:55.38S 141:59.40E - 16 particle | 2221 4-NOV-01 46:54.74S 142:02.38E 4470 | 4012 | 0023 46:54.58S 142:02.07E 4482 - | 0144 46:54.31S 142:01.57E - 17 particle | 1041 5-NOV-01 46:52.21S 141:59.34E 4436 | 2002 | 1124 46:52.12S 141:58.85E 4420 - | 1230 46:52.00S 141:58.16E 4402 18 SR3 | 2258 5-NOV-01 47:28.17S 144:54.04E 4289 | 352 | 2308 47:28.20S 144:53.95E 4298 - | 2339 47:28.18S 144:53.84E 4292 19 SR3 | 0102 6-NOV-01 47:26.64S 144:53.83E 4070 | 4222 | 0238 47:26.16S 144:53.41E 4068 48.3 | 0347 47:26.17S 144:52.91E 4054 20 SR3 | 0730 6-NOV-01 47:59.96S 144:40.20E 4010 | 4404 | 0913 47:59.79S 144:39.21E - 25.0 | 1107 48:00.06S 144:38.79E 4208 21 SR3 | 1321 6-NOV-01 48:19.12S 144:31.74E 3958 | 4202 | 1449 48:19.15S 144:31.57E - 19.6 | 1640 48:19.41S 144:31.90E - 22 SR3 | 1827 6-NOV-01 48:19.68S 144:32.82E 4050 | 354 | 1843 48:19.70S 144:32.86E - - | 1910 48:19.78S 144:32.80E - 23 particle | 0029 7-NOV-01 48:47.32S 144:19.75E 3998 | 1004 | 0056 48:47.41S 144:19.98E 3993 - | 0141 48:47.50S 144:20.62E 4005 24 SR3 | 0341 7-NOV-01 48:46.90S 144:25.00E 4033 | 4168 | 0512 48:47.16S 144:25.95E - 16.2 | 0630 48:47.48S 144:26.38E 3968 25 SR3 | 0917 7-NOV-01 48:47.82S 144:29.78E 3918 | 604 | 0937 48:47.84S 144:30.13E 3907 - | 1008 48:47.91S 144:30.37E - 26 SR3 | 1612 7-NOV-01 49:16.29S 144:06.54E 4150 | 4358 | 1746 49:16.12S 144:07.04E - 14.9 | 1928 49:16.14S 144:07.56E - 27 SR3 | 2201 7-NOV-01 49:36.68S 143:56.31E 3595 | 354 | 2212 49:36.66S 143:56.38E 3573 - | 2237 49:36.71S 143:56.58E - 28 SR3 | 0001 8-NOV-01 49:36.50S 143:56.50E 3560 | 3722 | 0117 49:36.33S 143:57.06E - 19.0 | 0230 49:36.41S 143:57.41E - 29 SR3 | 0439 8-NOV-01 49:53.58S 143:48.49E 3580 | 3872 | 0605 49:53.59S 143:49.57E 3736 17.4 | 0730 49:53.76S 143:50.77E 3759 30 SR3 | 0936 8-NOV-01 50:09.72S 143:40.09E 3649 | 3228 | 1050 50:09.57S 143:39.80E - - | 1130 50:10.06S 143:39.82E - 31 SR3 | 2355 8-NOV-01 50:23.91S 143:31.89E 3370 | 352 | 0009 50:23.95S 143:31.63E - - | 0037 50:24.06S 143:31.58E - 32 SR3 | 0253 9-NOV-01 50:24.49S 143:26.89E 3644 | 3802 | 0414 50:24.45S 143:26.65E 3658 17.0 | 0556 50:24.37S 143:26.19E 3596 33 SR3 | 0847 9-NOV-01 50:40.31S 143:25.06E 3413 | 3524 | 1002 50:40.50S 143:24.80E 3417 18.9 | 1116 50:40.38S 143:24.64E 3429 34 particle | 1447 9-NOV-01 51:00.13S 143:16.40E 3650 | 400 | 1455 51:00.16S 143:16.59E - - | 1502 51:00.18S 143:16.77E - 35 particle | 1815 9-NOV-01 51:00.76S 143:17.79E 3680 | 1002 | 1842 51:00.80S 143:17.83E - - | 1914 51:00.68S 143:18.20E 3704 36 particle | 2043 9-NOV-01 51:01.27S 143:17.98E 3690 | 402 | 2101 51:01.37S 143:18.02E - - | 2130 51:01.46S 143:18.54E - 37 SR3 | 2322 9-NOV-01 51:02.21S 143:20.36E 3736 | 3860 | 0053 51:02.04S 143:21.45E - 16.7 | 0236 51:01.60S 143:22.62E - 38 particle | 0452 10-NOV-01 51:00.26S 143:25.18E 3870 | 800 | 0513 51:00.17S 143:25.48E - - | 0536 51:00.26S 143:25.76E - 39 SR3 | 0939 10-NOV-01 51:15.55S 143:07.87E 3679 | 3854 | 1056 51:15.33S 143:08.31E 3744 21.1 | 1220 51:14.98S 143:09.39E - 40 SR3 | 1427 10-NOV-01 51:32.28S 142:59.71E 3645 | 3818 | 1541 51:31.83S 143:00.40E 3686 11.7 | 1723 51:31.47S 143:01.21E 3656 41 SR3 | 1928 10-NOV-01 51:48.57S 142:50.34E 3655 | 3784 | 2047 51:48.19S 142:50.69E - 19.8 | 2225 51:48.07S 142:50.60E - 42 SR3 | 2355 10-NOV-01 51:47.91S 142:50.62E 3680 | 350 | 0014 51:47.89S 142:50.64E - - | 0034 51:47.85S 142:50.65E - 43 SR3 | 0330 11-NOV-01 52:05.12S 142:41.80E 3428 | 3544 | 0428 52:05.05S 142:42.01E 3431 18.0 | 0550 52:04.98S 142:42.90E - 44 large volume | 0813 11-NOV-01 52:22.14S 142:31.93E 3490 | 16 | 0816 52:22.18S 142:31.85E - - | 0823 52:22.18S 142:31.93E - | START | | BOTTOM | END Station number | time date latitude longitude depth | maxP | time latitude longitude depth altim.| time latitude longitude depth | (m) |(dbar)| (m) (m) | (m) -----------------|----------------------------------------------|------|------------------------------------------|---------------------------------- 45 SR3 | 0849 11-NOV-01 52:22.30S 142:31.90E 3370 | 3492 | 0957 52:22.35S 142:32.21E 3383 15.3 | 1132 52:22.49S 142:32.00E - 46 SR3 | 1351 11-NOV-01 52:40.03S 142:23.60E 3300 | 3506 | 1512 52:39.88S 142:24.87E - 15.8 | 1646 52:40.02S 142:26.29E - 47 SR3 | 1829 11-NOV-01 52:39.80S 142:24.31E 3290 | 368 | 1839 52:39.83S 142:24.42E - - | 1902 52:39.79S 142:24.67E - 48 SR3 | 2204 11-NOV-01 53:07.87S 142:08.76E 3064 | 3178 | 2311 53:07.89S 142:09.14E - 20.4 | 0045 53:07.66S 142:09.38E - 49 SR3 | 0308 12-NOV-01 53:25.72S 141:57.11E 2775 | 2848 | 0404 53:25.70S 141:57.25E 2783 18.3 | 0530 53:25.60S 141:57.23E 2807 50 particle | 0538 13-NOV-01 53:44.31S 141:50.53E 2850 | 1002 | 0600 53:44.18S 141:50.90E - - | 0642 53:43.99S 141:50.88E 2958 51 SR3 | 0811 13-NOV-01 53:44.23S 141:51.09E 3000 | 3098 | 0916 53:44.19S 141:51.12E - 19.0 | 1040 53:44.09S 141:50.97E - 52 particle | 1638 13-NOV-01 53:44.15S 141:53.64E 3091 | 3184 | 1749 53:43.86S 141:53.95E 3105 39.2 | 1856 53:43.73S 141:54.06E - 53 particle | 0143 14-NOV-01 53:46.60S 141:53.36E 3010 | 404 | 0153 53:46.63S 141:53.43E - - | 0215 53:46.62S 141:53.53E - 54 SR3 | 1353 14-NOV-01 54:04.12S 141:36.13E 2504 | 2594 | 1452 54:03.85S 141:36.18E - 13.0 | 1621 54:03.38S 141:36.39E 2660 55 SR3 | 1934 14-NOV-01 54:31.78S 141:20.17E 2777 | 352 | 1947 54:31.77S 141:20.23E 2768 - | 2009 54:31.71S 141:20.18E 2773 56 SR3 | 2120 14-NOV-01 54:31.92S 141:20.68E 2800 | 2868 | 2226 54:32.08S 141:21.04E - 15.4 | 0000 54:32.00S 141:20.91E - 57 SR3 | 0340 15-NOV-01 55:00.97S 141:01.59E 3175 | 3256 | 0437 55:00.82S 141:01.52E - 20.0 | 0604 55:00.72S 141:01.68E - 58 SR3 | 1116 15-NOV-01 55:29.64S 140:43.99E 3900 | 350 | 1127 55:29.56S 140:44.04E - - | 1148 55:29.32S 140:43.95E - 59 SR3 | 1255 15-NOV-01 55:28.81S 140:43.90E 3900 | 4102 | 1410 55:28.63S 140:43.86E - 8.9 | 1557 55:28.26S 140:44.19E - 60 SR3 | 1939 15-NOV-01 55:55.30S 140:24.78E 3550 | 3598 | 2043 55:54.91S 140:25.05E - 12.3 | 2228 55:54.29S 140:25.09E - 61 SR3 | 0152 16-NOV-01 56:25.56S 140:05.85E 3800 | 4070 | 0310 56:25.39S 140:06.52E - 15.1 | 0428 56:25.16S 140:07.05E - 62 SR3 | 0810 16-NOV-01 56:56.14S 139:50.42E 4100 | 402 | 0824 56:56.22S 139:50.63E - - | 0849 56:56.26S 139:50.76E - 63 SR3 | 1014 16-NOV-01 56:55.93S 139:51.32E 4100 | 4204 | 1124 56:55.62S 139:51.60E - 16.8 | 1252 56:55.34S 139:51.97E - 64 particle | 1647 16-NOV-01 56:53.62S 139:54.91E 4000 | 1000 | 1720 56:53.59S 139:55.18E - - | 1754 56:53.50S 139:55.40E - 65 particle | 1955 16-NOV-01 56:52.98S 139:56.14E 4000 | 302 | 2007 56:52.80S 139:55.93E - - | 2029 56:52.72S 139:56.01E - 66 SR3 | 2014 17-NOV-01 57:51.15S 139:50.67E 4100 | 4056 | 2150 57:50.81S 139:50.72E - 13.9 | 2339 57:50.67S 139:50.35E - 67 SR3 | 1534 18-NOV-01 58:50.96S 139:51.12E 3860 | 4012 | 1713 58:50.82S 139:50.97E - 15.2 | 1840 58:50.55S 139:50.43E - 68 SR3 | 2009 18-NOV-01 58:50.22S 139:49.59E 3800 | 354 | 2022 58:50.14S 139:49.59E - - | 2046 58:50.11S 139:49.56E - 69 SR3 | 2352 18-NOV-01 59:20.94S 139:51.26E 4100 | 4254 | 0125 59:21.01S 139:50.90E - 17.5 | 0305 59:20.94S 139:51.39E - 70 SR3 | 0609 19-NOV-01 59:50.87S 139:51.21E 4376 | 402 | 0622 59:50.76S 139:51.07E 4377 - | 0643 59:50.58S 139:51.18E 4374 71 SR3 | 0753 19-NOV-01 59:50.20S 139:50.47E 4374 | 4534 | 0909 59:49.52S 139:50.24E - 15.7 | 1038 59:49.24S 139:50.71E - 72 SR3 | 1406 19-NOV-01 60:21.01S 139:50.94E 4340 | 4498 | 1539 60:20.25S 139:50.59E 4342 15.0 | 1744 60:20.16S 139:51.55E 4341 73 particle | 2150 20-NOV-01 60:51.13S 139:51.37E 4301 | 1000 | 2224 60:51.10S 139:51.73E 4302 - | 2256 60:51.07S 139:51.67E 4303 74 particle | 0027 21-NOV-01 60:50.88S 139:52.12E 4305 | 402 | 0042 60:50.87S 139:52.02E - - | 0105 60:50.77S 139:51.82E - 75 SR3 | 0239 21-NOV-01 60:50.17S 139:52.33E 4300 | 4464 | 0350 60:50.14S 139:52.42E - 15.0 | 0522 60:50.12S 139:52.67E - 76 particle | 1233 21-NOV-01 60:48.82S 139:56.47E 4310 | 4466 | 1436 60:48.24S 139:56.02E - 15.2 | 1634 60:47.90S 139:56.84E - 77 SR3 | 0448 22-NOV-01 61:20.79S 139:50.65E 4240 | 352 | 0457 61:20.71S 139:50.85E - - | 0521 61:20.61S 139:51.07E - 78 SR3 | 0755 22-NOV-01 61:19.11S 139:53.58E 4260 | 4400 | 0914 61:18.84S 139:53.41E - 17.0 | 1100 61:18.60S 139:52.41E - 79 SR3 | 1436 22-NOV-01 61:51.01S 139:50.68E 4198 | 4346 | 1614 61:51.06S 139:50.94E 4201 14.9 | 1747 61:50.94S 139:50.77E 4201 80 SR3 | 2101 22-NOV-01 62:20.98S 139:49.03E 3870 | 4006 | 2238 62:21.19S 139:48.28E 3871 13.7 | 0027 62:21.20S 139:47.74E - 81 SR3 | 0224 23-NOV-01 62:21.52S 139:49.26E 3865 | 352 | 0238 62:21.53S 139:49.48E 3859 - | 0301 62:21.52S 139:49.67E - 82 SR3 | 0503 24-NOV-01 62:50.59S 139:51.40E 3161 | 3246 | 0607 62:50.32S 139:51.57E 3162 21.6 | 0729 62:49.84S 139:51.81E 3165 83 SR3 | 1225 24-NOV-01 63:22.23S 139:51.64E 3718 | 3836 | 1346 63:21.74S 139:52.17E 3720 15.6 | 1526 63:21.58S 139:52.84E 3713 84 SR3 | 1648 24-NOV-01 63:21.85S 139:53.20E 3717 | 350 | 1706 63:21.79S 139:53.13E 3714 - | 1739 63:21.66S 139:52.68E 3717 85 particle | 2159 24-NOV-01 63:54.01S 139:52.89E 3636 | 1002 | 2226 63:53.82S 139:52.62E 3642 - | 2302 63:53.65S 139:52.58E 3641 86 particle | 0031 25-NOV-01 63:53.84S 139:51.65E 3640 | 400 | 0051 63:53.75S 139:51.52E 3640 - | 0121 63:53.79S 139:51.35E 3635 87 SR3 | 0434 25-NOV-01 63:53.33S 139:58.85E 3638 | 3750 | 0546 63:52.47S 139:59.78E 3638 20.0 | 0721 63:51.07S 140:00.74E 3637 88 particle | 1636 25-NOV-01 63:50.16S 139:57.88E 3649 | 3760 | 1759 63:49.48S 139:59.36E - 18.4 | 1921 63:48.89S 140:00.11E - 89 SR3 | 0750 26-NOV-01 64:09.87S 140:25.02E 3530 | 3632 | 0900 64:10.06S 140:25.32E 3532 14.5 | 1017 64:10.22S 140:25.84E 3531 | START | | BOTTOM | END Station number | time date latitude longitude depth | maxP | time latitude longitude depth altim.| time latitude longitude depth | (m) |(dbar)| (m) (m) | (m) -----------------|----------------------------------------------|------|------------------------------------------|---------------------------------- 90 SR3 | 1516 26-NOV-01 64:31.24S 141:22.27E 3403 | 3492 | 1632 64:31.11S 141:23.30E 3404 12.1 | 1754 64:31.30S 141:24.45E 3399 91 SR3 | 2049 26-NOV-01 64:47.12S 141:49.53E 3001 | 3086 | 2149 64:46.90S 141:50.05E 3011 14.0 | 2309 64:46.83S 141:50.95E 3030 92 SR3 | 0030 27-NOV-01 64:46.90S 141:52.74E 3060 | 352 | 0046 64:46.73S 141:52.99E 3058 - | 0108 64:46.53S 141:53.52E 3066 93 SR3 | 0441 27-NOV-01 65:01.30S 142:26.98E 2797 | 2838 | 0525 65:01.37S 142:26.56E 2774 19.2 | 0630 65:01.40S 142:26.06E 2759 94 SR3 | 0938 27-NOV-01 65:14.98S 143:04.66E 2948 | 3008 | 1043 65:15.32S 143:04.81E 2942 18.3 | 1200 65:15.52S 143:04.66E 2935 95 SR3 | 1728 27-NOV-01 65:31.93S 143:10.21E 2662 | 2716 | 1824 65:31.96S 143:10.33E 2662 14.2 | 1952 65:32.18S 143:10.66E 2652 96 SR3 | 2130 27-NOV-01 65:31.81S 143:11.25E 2655 | 352 | 2141 65:31.75S 143:11.28E 2654 - | 2202 65:31.83S 143:11.30E 2654 97 SR3 | 2323 27-NOV-01 65:41.57S 143:04.29E 2124 | 2168 | 0008 65:41.69S 143:04.48E 2112 13.2 | 0115 65:41.71S 143:04.51E 2101 98 SR3 | 0240 28-NOV-01 65:46.00S 142:57.68E 1679 | 1692 | 0315 65:46.04S 142:58.30E 1649 20.1 | 0419 65:46.29S 142:59.07E 1553 99 SR3 | 0741 28-NOV-01 65:48.68S 142:53.44E 1062 | 1052 | 0805 65:48.64S 142:54.00E 1026 18.0 | 0834 65:48.63S 142:54.71E 1017 100 SR3 | 1046 28-NOV-01 66:00.03S 143:09.70E 469 | 456 | 1054 65:59.95S 143:09.70E 469 16.7 | 1116 65:59.80S 143:09.99E 464 101 exit trough | 1512 28-NOV-01 66:11.96S 142:49.74E 490 | 480 | 1529 66:11.95S 142:49.22E 490 8.0 | 1556 66:11.98S 142:49.14E 484 102 exit trough | 1656 28-NOV-01 66:12.18S 143:08.88E 600 | 596 | 1713 66:12.18S 143:09.01E 598 14.9 | 1742 66:12.16S 143:09.10E 601 103 exit trough | 1901 28-NOV-01 66:11.92S 143:24.90E 551 | 536 | 1917 66:11.92S 143:24.90E 547 14.5 | 1939 66:11.92S 143:25.02E 543 104 exit trough | 2041 28-NOV-01 66:12.00S 143:39.99E 486 | 482 | 2100 66:11.88S 143:40.08E 477 14.9 | 2122 66:12.07S 143:40.50E 481 105 particle | 0213 29-NOV-01 66:35.14S 144:13.93E 801 | 790 | 0230 66:35.13S 144:13.99E 801 17.1 | 0257 66:35.16S 144:14.05E 805 106 SR3 | 0716 29-NOV-01 66:35.30S 144:15.18E 803 | 790 | 0730 66:35.29S 144:15.22E 807 18.9 | 0755 66:35.15S 144:15.27E 804 107 Buchanan Bay | 1535 29-NOV-01 67:09.42S 144:46.17E 484 | 470 | 1555 67:09.39S 144:46.00E 472 16.9 | 1632 67:09.03S 144:45.90E 474 108 Mertz Glacier| 1919 29-NOV-01 66:57.88S 145:15.95E 940 | 960 | 1957 66:58.14S 145:15.34E 977 18.6 | 2034 66:58.34S 145:15.12E 998 109 upstream | 0131 30-NOV-01 66:23.03S 144:18.12E 481 | 460 | 0145 66:22.95S 144:18.08E 476 20.2 | 0207 66:22.83S 144:17.94E 476 110 upstream | 0310 30-NOV-01 66:17.08S 144:23.64E 417 | 408 | 0320 66:17.08S 144:23.57E 417 20.3 | 0341 66:17.04S 144:23.66E 418 111 upstream | 0518 30-NOV-01 66:07.82S 144:29.81E 345 | 330 | 0527 66:07.76S 144:29.65E 344 17.3 | 0540 66:07.57S 144:29.69E 339 112 upstream | 0705 30-NOV-01 66:01.16S 144:29.09E 293 | 286 | 0713 66:01.13S 144:29.06E 292 19.1 | 0726 66:01.03S 144:28.81E 292 113 upstream | 0838 30-NOV-01 65:54.87S 144:30.82E 931 | 974 | 0900 65:54.80S 144:31.11E 959 20.3 | 0927 65:54.61S 144:31.06E 1023 114 upstream | 1020 30-NOV-01 65:52.62S 144:29.99E 1725 | 1786 | 1056 65:52.60S 144:30.08E 1737 19.2 | 1150 65:52.65S 144:30.19E 1729 115 upstream | 1308 30-NOV-01 65:47.35S 144:31.81E 2565 | 2618 | 1403 65:47.13S 144:31.62E 2563 12.8 | 1525 65:46.79S 144:31.99E 2607 116 downstream | 1634 3-DEC-01 65:44.63S 141:04.06E 442 | 440 | 1649 65:44.61S 141:04.12E 447 14.5 | 1717 65:44.46S 141:04.29E 456 117 downstream | 2013 3-DEC-01 65:40.27S 141:11.00E 772 | 768 | 2034 65:40.23S 141:11.45E 773 13.9 | 2106 65:40.22S 141:12.12E 770 118 downstream | 2201 3-DEC-01 65:36.75S 141:14.99E 1137 | 1152 | 2227 65:36.61S 141:15.45E 1160 13.0 | 2307 65:36.41S 141:15.94E 1159 119 downstream | 0031 4-DEC-01 65:30.20S 141:15.18E 1750 | 1824 | 0107 65:29.88S 141:15.59E 1819 18.4 | 0209 65:29.64S 141:15.13E 1833 120 downstream | 0424 4-DEC-01 65:19.75S 141:17.18E 2256 | 2288 | 0522 65:19.48S 141:17.50E 2256 20.9 | 0627 65:19.23S 141:17.26E 2261 121 downstream | 1015 4-DEC-01 65:08.03S 140:38.23E 2203 | 2234 | 1056 65:07.84S 140:38.63E 2207 19.6 | 1200 65:07.40S 140:39.00E 2277 122 particle | 1545 4-DEC-01 64:52.67S 139:52.52E 2458 | 1002 | 1611 64:52.68S 139:52.40E 2464 - | 1642 64:52.70S 139:52.50E 2467 123 particle | 1824 4-DEC-01 64:52.59S 139:52.89E 2468 | 502 | 1841 64:52.54S 139:52.65E 2472 - | 1908 64:52.38S 139:52.50E 2492 124 downstream | 2103 4-DEC-01 64:52.11S 139:52.38E 2503 | 2552 | 2145 64:52.20S 139:52.08E 2490 13.9 | 2253 64:52.19S 139:51.67E 2481 125 downstream | 0555 5-DEC-01 64:30.54S 139:52.92E 3043 | 3130 | 0702 64:30.48S 139:53.74E 3052 19.0 | 0809 64:30.48S 139:55.22E 3073 126 particle | 1319 5-DEC-01 63:55.24S 139:51.76E 3633 | 500 | 1337 63:55.16S 139:51.56E 3629 - | 1422 63:54.93S 139:50.92E 3632 127 particle | 1552 5-DEC-01 63:54.29S 139:49.32E 3632 | 1002 | 1616 63:54.10S 139:49.02E 3638 - | 1656 63:53.98S 139:48.58E 3637 128 particle | 1857 5-DEC-01 63:53.18S 139:47.75E 3649 | 352 | 1910 63:53.07S 139:47.71E 3652 - | 1936 63:52.99S 139:47.71E 3655 129 particle | 1336 7-DEC-01 60:50.29S 139:52.65E 4311 | 354 | 1352 60:50.23S 139:52.98E 4306 - | 1411 60:50.24S 139:53.23E 4302 130 particle | 1529 7-DEC-01 60:50.21S 139:53.59E 4307 | 1002 | 1555 60:50.14S 139:53.73E 4304 - | 1627 60:49.89S 139:53.79E 4304 131 particle | 1756 7-DEC-01 60:49.78S 139:56.02E 4305 | 502 | 1813 60:49.71S 139:56.26E 4307 - | 1850 60:49.68S 139:56.49E 4305 132 particle | 2041 7-DEC-01 60:48.66S 139:56.61E 4307 | 154 | 2051 60:48.57S 139:56.70E 4307 - | 2100 60:48.48S 139:56.70E 4308 133 particle | 1730 10-DEC-01 51:00.40S 143:18.39E 3700 | 344 | 1742 51:00.34S 143:18.49E - - | 1801 51:00.21S 143:18.60E 3721 134 particle | 1841 10-DEC-01 50:59.97S 143:19.09E 3740 | 1002 | 1907 50:59.83S 143:19.10E 3745 - | 1941 50:59.67S 143:19.31E - 135 particle | 0557 11-DEC-01 51:23.42S 142:58.61E 3700 | 52 | 0601 51:23.44S 142:58.94E - - | 0607 51:23.44S 142:59.02E - Table 3: Summary of samples drawn from Niskin bottles at each station, including salinity (sal), dissolved oxygen (do), nutrients (nut), chlorofluorocarbons (CFC), carbon tetrachloride (CCl4), dissolved inorganic carbon (dic), alkalinity (alk), dimethyl sulphide/ dimethyl sulphoniopropionate/dimethyl sulphoxide (dms), halocarbons (hal), barium (bam), barite (bat), ammonia (NH3), δ30Si, dissolved organic carbon (doc), particulate organic carbon (POC), particulate silicate (PSi), 15N-nitrate, 18O, 234Th, 230Th/231Pa, primary productivity (pp), bacterial production (bac), grazing dilution (grz), spectral absorbance (sa), HPLC pigments (pig), flow cytometry (fc) for phytoplankton and bacteria, coccolithophorid counts (coc), protist bulk fixes (pro), size-fractionated chlorophyll and primary production (frac), species ID by Dehairs group (sp.D), and bacterial groups sampled by Skerratt (baS). Note that 1=samples taken, 0=no samples taken, 2=surface sample only (i.e. from shallowest Niskin bottle), 3=one sample only from the profile. Also included are stations where trace metal casts for iron were taken from the stern (fe); stations where vertical fast repetition rate fluorometry (frrf) and transmittance (tran) were measured, using additional sensors; and stations where fluorescence was measured on the main rosette (fl) using a Sea Tech fluorometer from either CSIRO or Antarctic Division, denoted respectively by C or A in the table. Note that for stations 1 to 52 where the transmissometer was fitted to the main rosette package, no good transmittance data were obtained. Sation sal do nut CFC CC dic dms hal bam bat NH3 δ30 doc POC 15N_ 18O 234 230Th pp bac grz sa pig fc coc pro frac sp baS fe fr tran fl l4 alk Si PSi NO3 Th 231Pa .D rf 1 test 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 2 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 3 SR3 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 4 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 5 SR3 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 6 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 7 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 8 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 C 9 SR3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 10 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 C 11 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 A 13 SR3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 14 part. 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 A 15 part. 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 C 16 part. 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 part. 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 C 19 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 20 SR3 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 C 21 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 22 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 C 23 part. 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 C 24 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 25 SR3 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 C 26 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 C 27 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 C 28 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 C 29 SR3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 C 30 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 C 31 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 C 32 SR3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 33 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 C 34 part. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 C 35 part. 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 36 part. 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 C 37 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 C 38 part. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 39 SR3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 40 SR3 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 41 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 42 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 C 43 SR3 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 44 l.vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 45 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 46 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 47 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 C 48 SR3 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 C 49 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 C Table 3: (continued) Sation sal do nut CFC CC dic dms hal bam bat NH3 δ30 doc POC 15N_ 18O 234 230Th pp bac grz sa pig fc coc pro frac sp baS fe fr tran fl l4 alk Si PSi NO3 Th 231Pa .D rf 50 part. 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 C 51 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 C 52 part. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 53 part. 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 C 54 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 55 SR3 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 C 56 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 57 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 C 58 SR3 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 C 59 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 60 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 61 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 C 62 SR3 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 63 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 64 part. 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 C 65 part. 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 C 66 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 67 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 68 SR3 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 C 69 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 C 70 SR3 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 C 71 SR3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 72 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 73 part. 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 C 74 part. 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 C 75 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 C 76 part. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77 SR3 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 C 78 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 79 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 C 80 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 C 81 SR3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 C 82 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 83 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 84 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 C 85 part. 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 C 86 part. 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 C 87 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 C 88 part. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 C 89 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 C 90 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 C 91 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 92 SR3 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 C 93 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 C 94 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 95 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 C 96 SR3 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 C 97 SR3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 98 SR3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 99 SR3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C Table 3: (continued) Sation sal do nut CFC CC dic dms hal bam bat NH3 δ30 doc POC 15N_ 18O 234 230Th pp bac grz sa pig fc coc pro frac sp baS fe fr tran fl l4 alk Si PSi NO3 Th 231Pa .D rf 100 SR3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 C 101 exit 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 102 exit 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 103 exit 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 104 exit 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 C 105 part. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 C 106 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 107 B.Bay 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 108 Mertz 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 109 up 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 110 up 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 111 up 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 112 up 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 113 up 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 114 up 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 115 up 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 116 down 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 A 117 down 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 A 118 down 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 A 119 down 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 A 120 down 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 A 121 down 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 A 122 part. 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 A 123 part. 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 A 124 down 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 125 down 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 A 126 part. 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 A 127 part. 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 A 128 part. 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 A 129 part. 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 A 130 part. 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 A 131 part. 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 A 132 part. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 A 133 part. 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 134 part. 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 A 135 part. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A TABLE 4: Summary of mooring recovery and deployment information. Positions and depths are at the estimated landing sites (i.e. allowing for anchor 'dragback'). Depths are corrected for local sound velocity. For recoveries, 'release time' is the time release command was sent to acoustic release at the base of the mooring; for deployments, 'release time' is the time final component released from trawl deck. Suffixes '4' and '5' in mooring names refer respectively to the 4th and 5th deployment seasons in the SAZ program. MOORING POSITION DEPTH RELEASE TIME POSITION (UTC) (decimal degrees) RECOVERIES SAZB_4 46°54.3'S 142°02.7'E 4600m 1935, 02/11/2001 46.905°S 142.045°E SAZC_4 53°44.47'S 141°45.22'E 2120m 0030, 13/11/2001 53.7412°S 141.7537°E DEPLOYMENTS SAZB_5 46°47.442'S 142°02.430'E 4600m 0407, 04/11/2001 46.79070°S 142.04050°E SAZC_5 53°44.472'S 141°45.780'E 2040m 0009, 14/11/2001 53.74120°S 141.76300°E SAZF_5 60°44.430'S 139°53.970'E 4393m 0249, 20/11/2001 60.74050°S 139.89950°E TABLE 5: Principal investigators (*=cruise participant) for CTD water sampling programs. MEASUREMENT NAME AFFILIATION CTD, salinity, O2, NUTs *Steve Rintoul CSIRO CFCs, CCl4 *Mark Warner University of Washington DIC, alkalinity *Bronte Tilbrook CSIRO DMS/DMSP/DMSO *Jack Di Tullio Grice Marine Lab., S. Carolina DMS/DMSP *Graham Jones Southern Cross University halocarbons James Butler NOAA barium, barite, NH3 *Frank Dehairs Vrije Universiteit, Brussels δ30Si *Damien Cardinal Royal Museum for Central Africa, Belgium DOC,POC,PSi *Tom Trull Antarctic CRC 15N-N03 Danny Sigman Princeton University 18O of dissolved oxygen Michael Bender Princeton University 234Th *Ken Buesseler WHOI *Nicolas Savoye Vrije Universiteit, Brussels 230Th, 231Pa Roger Francois WHOI iron (sampled from stern) *Peter Sedwick Bermuda Bio. Station for Research bacterial and primary pro- *Brian Griffiths CSIRO duction, microzooplankton grazing phytoplankton community *Phil Boyd NIWA structure phytoplankton Simon Wright Antarctic Division *Harvey Marchant Antarctic Division bacterial groups Guy Abel University of Tasmania TABLE 6: Scientific personnel (cruise participants) for cruise AU0103. Edward Abraham phytoplankton community structure NIWA Margaret Appleton organic carbon team Antarctic CRC Andrew Bowie iron Antarctic CRC Philip Boyd phytoplankton community structure University of Otago Stephen Bray CTD hydrochemistry, moorings Antarctic CRC Ken Buesseler thorium Dept. of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, WHOI Damien Cardinal barium, NH3, δ30Si, thorium Royal Museum for Central Africa, Belgium Alexis Chaigneau CTD Laboratory of Geophysi- cal Studies and Spatial Oceanography, Toulouse Kelvin Cope electronics Antarctic Division Guido Corno organic carbon team Antarctic CRC George Cresswell CTD, moorings CSIRO Clive Crossley flow cytometry Antarctic CRC Clodagh Moy CTD, hydrochemistry Antarctic CRC Andrew Davidson phytoplankton Antarctic Division Frank Dehairs barium, NH3, δ30Si, thorium Vrije Univ., Brussels Jack Di Tullio DMS/DMSP/DMSO Grice Marine Lab., S. Carolina Esther Fischer DMS/DMSP Srn Cross University Kelly Goodwin halocarbons CIMAS, Univ. of Miami Brian Griffiths primary production, grazing CSIRO Clint Hare Iron College of Marine Studies, Univ. of Delaware Brian Hunt CPR, zooplankton nets Antarctic Division Dave Hutchins Iron College of Marine Studies, Univ. of Delaware Neale Johnston CTD hydrochemistry CSIRO Graham Jones DMS/DMSP Srn Cross Univ. Bronwyn Kimber sea ice CODES, University of Tasmania Dan King halocarbons CIRES, Univ. of CO Alex Kozyr DIC, alkalinity Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Ruth Lawless dotzapper Antarctic Division Sophie Le Roux organic carbon team Antarctic CRC Carsten Lemmen organic carbon team Antarctic CRC Sandric Leong light absorption of phytoplankton Soka University, Japan Harvey Marchant voyage leader, phytoplankton Antarctic Division Richard Matear DIC, alkalinity CSIRO Fred Menzia CFC PMEL, NOAA Daniela Mersch organic carbon team Antarctic CRC Gordon Mor doctor Antarctic Division Angus Munro sea ice Antarctic CRC Nobuaki Ohi light absorption of phytoplankton Soka University, Japan Andrew Pankowski sea ice School of Agricultural Science, University of Tasmania Naomi Petrie organic carbon team Antarctic CRC Peter Pokorny communications Antarctic Division Linda Popels Iron College of Marine Studies, University of Delaware Mark Pretty DIC, alkalinity CSIRO James Reid sea ice School of Plant Science, University of Tasmania Malcolm Reid phytoplankton community structure University of Otago Steve Rintoul CTD, chief scientist CSIRO Sarah Riseman DMS/DMSP/DMSO Hollings Marine Lab., South Carolina Mark Rosenberg CTD, moorings Antarctic CRC Tilla Roy CTD Antarctic CRC Karl Safi bacterial production NIWA Nicolas Savoye barium, NH3, δ30Si, thorium Vrije Univ., Brussels Bryan Scott computing Antarctic Division Peter Sedwick iron Bermuda Bio. Stn for Research Jenny Skerratt microbial processes Antarctic CRC Serguei Sokolov CTD CSIRO Robert Strzepek phytoplankton community structure The Harrison Lab, University of British Columbia Kunio Takahashi copepods National Institute of Polar Research, Japan Paul Thomson phytoplankton Antarctic Division Bronte Tilbrook DIC, alkalinity CSIRO Ryszard Tokarczyk halocarbons Dept. of Oceanography, Dalhousie University Lianos Triantafillos squid Antarctic CRC Tom Trull organic carbon team leader Antarctic CRC Simon Ussher Iron School of Environmental Rick Van Den phytoplankton, deputy voyage Antarctic Division Enden leader Robert Van Hale phytoplankton community structure University of Otago Tessa Vance DMS/DMSP Srn Cross University Tony Veness electronics Antarctic Division Robert Walsh phytoplankton community structure DPIWE, Tasmania Mark Warner CFC School of Oceanography, University of Washington Shari Yvon-Lewis halocarbons AOML, NOAA 5.1.2. PRESSURE As described in previous data reports, noise in the pressure signal for CTD1193 (used for stations 1 to 108) was high, with spikes of up to 1 dbar amplitude occurring. When forming pressure monotonic data prior to 2 dbar averaging, these spikes cause low data point attendance for a significant number of 2 dbar pressure bins, resulting in missing bins in the 2 dbar averaged data. To reduce the number of missing bins, the minimum number of data points required in a 2 dbar bin to form a 2 dbar average was set to 8. To recover another ~20 missing bins from various stations, this minimum threshold value was reduced to 5. For most remaining missing bins, values were linearly interpolated between surrounding bins (Table 13), except where the local temperature gradient was too high. Further missing 2 dbar bins (Table 12) are due to quality control of the data. For CTD1103 (stations 109 to 135) any noise in the pressure signal was very low, and the minimum number of data points required in a 2 dbar bin to form a 2 dbar average was set to 10. For stations 24, 29, 62, 82 and 87, the surface pressure offset was obtained by manual inspection of the data. For stations 107 and 108, hypersaline water was placed in the sensor cover prior to commencement of logging to try to prevent sensor freezing during deployment; the surface pressure offset for these two stations was also obtained by manual inspection of the data. For station 100, logging commenced when the CTD was already in the water at ~4 dbar, and the surface pressure offset was estimated from values from surrounding stations. Surface pressure offset values applied to pressure data for each station are listed in Table 8. 5.1.3. DISSOLVED OXYGEN CTD dissolved oxygen calibration results are shown in Figure 9, and the derived calibration coefficients are listed in Table 17. A new oxygen sensor was fitted to CTD1193 at the start of the cruise, and the same oxygen sensor was fitted to CTD1103 for station 109 onwards. For the bulk of the water column the CTD dissolved oxygen data are good, and the standard deviation values for the CTD to bottle comparison are within 1% of full scale values (where full scale is approximately 380 µmol/l for data between 35 and 1000 dbar, and ~270 µmol/l for data below 1000 dbar). Much of the near surface part of the oxygen profiles is highly suspicious, in particular for the top 20 dbar, and often down to 30 dbar. In general, transient errors are common when CTD dissolved oxygen sensors (on General Oceanics CTDs) enter the water, and near surface oxygen data should be treated with caution. 5.1.4. FLUORESCENCE AND TRANSMITTANCE All fluorescence data only have preliminary calibrations applied, to convert sensor output into voltages. These data should not be used quantitatively other than for linkage with primary productivity data. Note that fluorescence data for stations 7, 8 and 9 are suspect due to a flattening battery pack. The transmissometer was fitted to the main CTD frame for most stations up to station 52, however all data are suspect. Good transmittance data were obtained after fitting the transmissometer to the CSIRO Seacat, deployed from the stern gantry - these data are not included here. 5.1.5. CONDUCTIVITY SIGNAL NOISE Close examination of the conductivity cell signal from General Oceanics CTDs reveals a signal noise large enough to generate spurious small scale vertical density inversions (Rosenberg et al., 1997, Tom Whitworth, pers. comm.). From previous cruises, CTD 1103 was found to generate the noisiest conductivity data. For this cruise, a comparison of conductivity signal noise was made between the two CTDs used, 1193 and 1103. Firstly, the full 25 Hz CTD data were extracted for a series of stations from approximately equivalent latitudes for both CTD 1193 and 1103. Steep parts of the vertical profile (i.e. near the top and bottom) were excluded. Data were then smoothed using a running mean average with a window size of ±5 data points. Lastly, variances were calculated for both the conductivity and temperature data. For the stations analysed in this way, there is no obvious difference in conductivity noise levels between the two CTDs (Figure 11) - for this cruise, evidently both CTDs are equally likely to give spurious vertical density inversions. 5.2. NISKIN BOTTLE DATA A Guildline 'Autosal' salinometer serial no. 62549 was used for analysis of all salinity bottle samples. International Standard Seawater batch numbers used are detailed in Appendix 1 (Table A1.1). For Niskin bottle 19, a loose lanyard prior to station 60 allowed the bottom end cap to pre-trip on many occasions. As a result, Niskin bottle samples from bottle 19 were bad for all parameters for the following stations: 9, 19, 21, 23-27, 29, 30, 41-43, 45, 46, 48, 50-53, 56, 57, 59. For stations 66 to 75, oxygen reagent 1 was accidentally topped up with Milli-Q instead of reagent 1, and oxygen bottle samples were pickled with this dilute reagent. These samples were analysed using a standardisation done with this same dilute reagent. Examination of the bottle oxygen concentrations and standardisation revealed no suspicious data - reagent volumes added to samples are in excess, thus the dilution of reagent 1 appears to have been within tolerance. For station 43, faulty rosette pylon behaviour resulted in all rosette positions out of synch. by 1 position, with bottle 24 tripped at the deepest position. For station 94, the pylon was accidentally set to position 1 prior to the cast, thus bottle 2 was tripped at the deepest position, and bottle 1 at the shallowest. Nitrate+nitrite versus phosphate nutrient data are shown in Figure 10. TABLE 7: Calibration coefficients and calibration dates for CTD serial numbers 1193 and 1103 (unit numbers 5 and 7 respectively) used during cruise AU0103. COEFFICIENT VALUE OF COEFFICIENT COEFFICIENT VALUE OF COEFFICIENT CTD serial number 1193 (unit no. 5) CTD serial number 1103 (unit no. 7) (stations 1-108) (stations 109-135) pressure caib. coefficients pressure caib. coefficients CSIRO Caib. Facility - 08/10/2001 CSIRO Caib. Facility - 03/10/2001 pcal0 -1.112466e+01 pcal0 -2.107754e+01 pcal1 1.007841e-01 pcal1 1.001927e-01 pcal2 2.329940e-09 pcal2 9.702446e-09 pcal3 -6.068648e-14 pcal3 -6.379487e-14 pcal4 5.809276e-19 pcal4 3.916767e-19 platinum temp. caib. coefficients platinum temp. caib. coefficients CSIRO Caib. Facility - 02/10/2001 CSIRO Caib. Facility - 12/10/2001 Tcal0 -5.448864e-02 Tcal0 6.705048e-02 Tcal1 4.989851e-04 Tcal1 4.998226e-04 Tcal2 -1.960000e-12 Tcal2 0.0 pressure temp. caib. coefficients pressure temp. caib. coefficients CSIRO Caib. Facility - 08/10/2001 CSIRO Caib. Facility - 03/10/2001 Tpcal0 8.43604e+01 Tpcal0 9.09870e+01 Tpcal1 -3.15992e-04 Tpcal1 -4.16256e-04 Tpcal2 -3.25000e-08 Tpcal2 -3.01003e-08 Tpcal3 0.0 Tpcal3 0.0 Tpcal4 0.0 Tpcal4 0.0 coefficients for temp. correction coefficients for temp. correction to pressure to pressure CSIRO Caib. Facility - 08/10/2001 CSIRO Caib. Facility - 03/10/2001 T0 20.00 T0 20.00 S1 -1.88557e-05 S1 -1.40716e-05 S2 -1.08758e-01 S2 -2.54401e-02 digitiser counts to voltage caib. digitiser counts to voltage caib. for for fluorescence channel fluorescence channel (used CTD1193 values) Aurora Australis - 22/11/2001 f0 -5.57687 f0 -5.57687 f1 1.70179e-04 f1 1.70179e-04 f2 0.0 f2 0.0 TABLE 8: Surface pressure offsets. ** indicates value estimated from manual inspection of data. STN SURFACE P STN SURFACE P STN SURFACE P STN SURFACE P NO. OFFSET(DBAR) NO. OFFSET(DBAR) NO. OFFSET(DBAR) NO. OFFSET(DBAR) --- ------------ --- ------------ --- ------------ --- ------------ 1 0.94 35 0.27 69 0.42 103 0.33 2 1.00 36 0.73 70 -0.17 104 0.86 3 0.53 37 0.06 71 -0.36 105 0.43 4 0.52 38 -0.08 72 -0.15 106 0.36 5 0.39 39 0.09 73 0.15 107 -0.20** 6 0.11 40 0.25 74 0.60 108 -0.30** 7 0.21 41 0.35 75 0.46 109 0.00 8 0.75 42 0.00 76 -0.44 110 0.79 9 0.90 43 0.52 77 0.04 111 1.00 10 0.83 44 0.21 78 -0.29 112 0.50 11 0.18 45 -0.33 79 -0.44 113 0.77 12 0.15 46 -0.89 80 0.09 114 0.85 13 0.52 47 0.23 81 -0.47 115 0.98 14 0.77 48 -0.42 82 0.20** 116 0.46 15 0.03 49 0.46 83 -0.29 117 0.59 16 0.15 50 -0.05 84 -0.48 118 0.99 17 0.15 51 -0.22 85 0.74 119 0.91 18 0.26 52 0.15 86 0.31 120 0.40 19 0.51 53 -0.56 87 0.00** 121 0.23 20 -0.57 54 0.05 88 0.22 122 0.36 21 0.03 55 -0.47 89 -0.06 123 1.05 22 -0.09 56 0.41 90 0.01 124 0.65 23 -0.11 57 -0.03 91 0.17 125 0.24 24 -0.20** 58 0.02 92 0.06 126 -0.12 25 0.15 59 -0.11 93 -0.20 127 0.93 26 0.27 60 -0.11 94 0.14 128 0.55 27 0.42 61 -0.69 95 -0.16 129 0.00 28 -0.01 62 0.30** 96 -0.04 130 0.25 29 -0.40** 63 0.08 97 0.47 131 0.74 30 0.19 64 -0.17 98 0.02 132 0.66 31 0.22 65 -0.67 99 -0.40 133 -0.35 32 0.38 66 -0.34 100 -0.20** 134 -0.27 33 0.32 67 -0.36 101 -0.05 135 0.23 34 0.15 68 0.41 102 0.35 TABLE 9: CTD conductivity calibration coefficients. F(1), F(2) and F(3) are respectively conductivity bias, slope and station-dependent correction calibration terms. n is the number of samples retained for calibration in each station grouping; σ is the standard deviation of the conductivity residual for the n samples in the station grouping. STN GROUPING F1 F2 F3 n σ 001 to 007 -0.12400843E-01 0.96693175E-03 -0.12678197E-07 94 0.001331 008 to 013 -0.14229483E-01 0.96688131E-03 0.45234260E-08 81 0.001186 014 to 017 -0.51762480E-02 0.94845242E-03 -0.28958816E-07 35 0.000878 018 to 047 -0.11944275E-01 0.94817109E-03 0.22435385E-08 400 0.000996 048 to 062 0.96277611E-03 0.94791325E-03 -0.65411185E-09 258 0.000843 063 to 068 -0.87553383E-02 0.94830642E-03 -0.19967568E-08 89 0.000679 069 to 076 0.21653981E-02 0.94790089E-03 -0.85898836E-09 136 0.000976 077 to 083 0.27664169E-01 0.94705848E-03 0.39321052E-10 132 0.001127 084 to 099 0.35267267E-01 0.94685326E-03 -0.52840211E-09 279 0.001360 100 to 108 0.30957091E-01 0.94556130E-03 0.13561741E-07 66 0.001069 109 to 119 0.30445228E-01 0.10055224E-02 -0.11314836E-08 131 0.001265 120 to 129 0.23654117E-01 0.10055005E-02 0.79152735E-09 141 0.001313 130 to 135 -0.97232207E-02 0.10041337E-02 0.19756780E-07 24 0.001586 TABLE 10: Station-dependent-corrected conductivity slope term (F2 + F3 . N), for station number N, and F2 and F3 the conductivity slope and station-dependent correction calibration terms respectively. STN STN STN NBR (F2 + F3 . N) NBR (F2 + F3 . N) NBR (F2 + F3 . N) --- -------------- --- -------------- --- -------------- 1 0.96691907E-03 47 0.94827895E-03 93 0.94680412E-03 2 0.96690639E-03 48 0.94788185E-03 94 0.94680359E-03 3 0.96689371E-03 49 0.94788120E-03 95 0.94680306E-03 4 0.96688103E-03 50 0.94788055E-03 96 0.94680253E-03 5 0.96686836E-03 51 0.94787989E-03 97 0.94680201E-03 6 0.96685568E-03 52 0.94787924E-03 98 0.94680148E-03 7 0.96684300E-03 53 0.94787858E-03 99 0.94680095E-03 8 0.96691750E-03 54 0.94787793E-03 100 0.94691748E-03 9 0.96692202E-03 55 0.94787727E-03 101 0.94693104E-03 10 0.96692654E-03 56 0.94787662E-03 102 0.94694460E-03 11 0.96693107E-03 57 0.94787597E-03 103 0.94695816E-03 12 0.96693559E-03 58 0.94787531E-03 104 0.94697172E-03 13 0.96694011E-03 59 0.94787466E-03 105 0.94698528E-03 14 0.94804700E-03 60 0.94787400E-03 106 0.94699885E-03 15 0.94801804E-03 61 0.94787335E-03 107 0.94701241E-03 16 0.94798908E-03 62 0.94787270E-03 108 0.94702597E-03 17 0.94796012E-03 63 0.94820530E-03 109 0.10053662E-02 18 0.94821469E-03 64 0.94820372E-03 110 0.10053654E-02 19 0.94821691E-03 65 0.94820215E-03 111 0.10053647E-02 20 0.94821913E-03 66 0.94820057E-03 112 0.10053639E-02 21 0.94822134E-03 67 0.94819899E-03 113 0.10053631E-02 22 0.94822356E-03 68 0.94819742E-03 114 0.10053624E-02 23 0.94822577E-03 69 0.94784162E-03 115 0.10053616E-02 24 0.94822799E-03 70 0.94784076E-03 116 0.10053608E-02 25 0.94823020E-03 71 0.94783990E-03 117 0.10053600E-02 26 0.94823242E-03 72 0.94783905E-03 118 0.10053593E-02 27 0.94823464E-03 73 0.94783819E-03 119 0.10053585E-02 28 0.94823685E-03 74 0.94783733E-03 120 0.10055955E-02 29 0.94823907E-03 75 0.94783647E-03 121 0.10055963E-02 30 0.94824128E-03 76 0.94783561E-03 122 0.10055971E-02 31 0.94824350E-03 77 0.94706151E-03 123 0.10055979E-02 32 0.94824571E-03 78 0.94706155E-03 124 0.10055987E-02 33 0.94824793E-03 79 0.94706159E-03 125 0.10055995E-02 34 0.94825015E-03 80 0.94706163E-03 126 0.10056003E-02 35 0.94825236E-03 81 0.94706166E-03 127 0.10056011E-02 36 0.94825458E-03 82 0.94706170E-03 128 0.10056018E-02 37 0.94825679E-03 83 0.94706174E-03 129 0.10056026E-02 38 0.94825901E-03 84 0.94680887E-03 130 0.10067021E-02 39 0.94826122E-03 85 0.94680835E-03 131 0.10067219E-02 40 0.94826344E-03 86 0.94680782E-03 132 0.10067416E-02 41 0.94826566E-03 87 0.94680729E-03 133 0.10067614E-02 42 0.94826787E-03 88 0.94680676E-03 134 0.10067812E-02 43 0.94827009E-03 89 0.94680623E-03 135 0.10068009E-02 44 0.94827230E-03 90 0.94680570E-03 45 0.94827452E-03 91 0.94680518E-03 46 0.94827674E-03 92 0.94680465E-03 TABLE 11: CTD raw data scans deleted during data processing. For raw scan number ranges, the lowest and highest scan numbers are not included in the action (except for scan 1). STATION NO. RAW SCAN NOS. REASON ------------- ------------------------- --------------------------------- 1, upcast 1918-1920 P spike 4, upcast 2771-3, 2877-9 P spike 7, upcast 4173-6, 4212-4 P spike 8, upcast 644-6, 1519-21, 1854-7, P spike 1874-81, 1935-9, 3519-21, 3569-71, 3586- 9, 3605-7, 3631-3, 3654-6 24, downcast 1-450 CTD deck unit not warmed up 29, downcast 1-830 CTD deck unit not warmed up 62, downcast 1-1000 CTD deck unit not warmed up 82, downcast 1-520 CTD deck unit not warmed up 87, downcast 1-1300 CTD deck unit not warmed up 95, upcast 5348-52 P spike 107, downcast 1-4600 hypersaline water in sensor cover 108, downcast 1-1500 hypersaline water in sensor cover 128, upcast 4156-9 P spike TABLE 12: Missing data points in 2 dbar-averaged files. '1' indicates missing data for the indicated parameters: T=temperature; S=salinity, σ(T), specific volume anomaly and geopotential anomaly; O=oxygen; F=fluorescence. STN PRESSURE (DBAR) NO. WHERE DATA MISSING T S O F 1 whole stn 1 6 2252-2352 1 1 6 2354-3246 1 7 1970-2066 1 1 7 2068-2898 1 11 whole stn 1 12 whole stn 1 13 whole stn 1 1 15 whole stn 1 16 whole stn 1 17 whole stn 1 20 2344-2348 1 23 whole stn 1 24 4040-4060 1 28 180-184 1 1 34 whole stn 1 35 whole stn 1 36 whole stn 1 38 whole stn 1 44 whole stn 1 50 whole stn 1 52 whole stn 1 53 whole stn 1 64 whole stn 1 65 whole stn 1 70 whole stn 1 73 whole stn 1 74 whole stn 1 76 whole stn 1 76 1672-1674 1 85 whole stn 1 86 whole stn 1 88 whole stn 1 89 2-48 1 90 50-52 1 1 100 2-4 1 1 1 1 105 whole stn 1 107 whole stn 1 1 108 whole stn 1 1 120 whole stn 1 121 whole stn 1 122 whole stn 1 123 whole stn 1 125 whole stn 1 126 whole stn 1 127 whole stn 1 128 whole stn 1 129 whole stn 1 130 whole stn 1 132 whole stn 1 133 whole stn 1 134 whole stn 1 135 whole stn 1 TABLE 13: 2 dbar averages interpolated from surrounding 2 dbar values, for the indicated parameters: T=temperature; S=salinity, σ(T) , specific volume anomaly and geopotential anomaly; F=fluorescence. STN INTERPOLATED PARAMETERS NO 2 DBAR VALUES INTERPOLATED --- --------------------------------- ------------ 6 1066, 1168 O 6 2254-2256 T, S 7 1304, 1410, 1458, 1466-1468, 1532 O 7 1970-1972, 1986-1988 T, S 30 2634 T, S, O 40 2694 T, S, O 45 1154 T, S, O 51 1464 T, S, O 60 2462 T, S, O 61 2280 T, S, O 71 1256, 2418 T, S, O 78 2368 T, S, O TABLE 14: Suspect 2 dbar averages for the indicated parameters: T=temperature; S=salinity, σ(T), specific volume anomaly and geopotential anomaly; O=oxygen. * = general caution required, due to frequent transient sensor errors when the CTD enters the water. QUESTIONABLE STATION NO. 2 DBAR VALUE (DBAR) PARAMETERS 16 4000-4012 O *all stations 2-4 S *all stations 2-20 O TABLE 15: Questionable nutrient sample values (not deleted from bottle data file). PHOSPHATE NITRATE SILICATE station rosette station rosette station rosette number position number position number position ------------------- ----------------- ----------------- 29 whole stn 43 4 45 3 69 4 72 11 78 12 97 9 113 whole stn 113 whole stn 117 whole stn 118 whole stn 122 whole stn 122 whole stn 123 whole stn 123 whole stn 124 whole stn 124 whole stn TABLE 16: Digital reversing protected thermometers used: serial numbers are listed. stations 1 to 135 1683 on pos. 24 1624 on pos. 12 1625, 1682 on pos. 2 TABLE 17: CTD dissolved oxygen calibration coefficients. K(1), K(2), K(3), K(4), K(5) and K(6) are respectively oxygen current slope, oxygen sensor time constant, oxygen current bias, temperature correction term, weighting factor, and pressure correction term. dox is equal to 2.8σ (for σ as defined in Rosenberg et al., 1995); n is the number of samples retained for calibration in each station or station grouping. STN NBR K(1) K(2) K(3) K(4) K(5) K(6) dox n 2 6.912 4.00 -0.684 -0.03195 0.22430 0.17482E-04 0.12445 10 3 9.960 4.00 -1.607 -0.03173 0.71194 0.49421E-04 0.23750 12 4 9.475 4.00 -1.474 -0.03299 0.16668 0.57404E-04 0.17484 20 5 8.062 4.00 -1.251 -0.01867 0.83694 0.14405E-03 0.29252 21 6 8.129 9.00 -1.250 -0.02263 0.56242 0.13824E-03 0.16039 20 7 6.403 5.50 -0.913 -0.00744 0.46445 0.13388E-03 0.24943 21 8 6.115 5.50 -0.678 -0.01635 0.77336 0.66683E-04 0.11864 13 9 9.205 8.50 -1.498 -0.02543 0.69864 0.16783E-03 0.16433 20 10 7.921 5.50 -1.254 -0.01550 0.64807 0.18216E-03 0.15138 20 11 7.960 9.50 -1.213 -0.01700 0.02057 0.13327E-03 0.18890 22 14 9.300 4.00 -1.400 -0.03600 0.75000 0.15000E-03 0.21524 9 16 9.052 8.00 -1.442 -0.02344 0.74671 0.14595E-03 0.12373 12 17 8.795 4.00 -1.384 -0.02407 0.74967 0.14314E-03 0.24080 21 18 8.700 7.00 -1.200 -0.03600 0.75000 0.15000E-03 0.23160 12 19 8.919 4.50 -1.405 -0.02321 0.25903 0.14130E-03 0.14356 21 20 8.585 4.00 -1.333 -0.02092 0.91733 0.14039E-03 0.19361 24 21 9.961 5.00 -1.617 -0.02732 0.33264 0.14976E-03 0.27909 20 22 7.600 4.00 -0.746 -0.04166 0.01409 0.21553E-04 0.21020 14 24 9.485 5.50 -1.534 -0.02118 0.63844 0.15718E-03 0.15158 16 25 8.130 4.50 -1.043 -0.03220 0.67170 0.10759E-03 0.16108 12 26 8.067 4.50 -1.222 -0.01272 0.68518 0.13136E-03 0.18858 20 27 6.358 9.00 -0.581 -0.03279 0.90211 0.34873E-04 0.12788 12 28 10.035 4.00 -1.590 -0.03837 0.51531 0.12646E-03 0.19962 20 29 10.096 4.50 -1.602 -0.03871 0.30482 0.12998E-03 0.15828 19 30 10.485 7.00 -1.658 -0.05009 0.16197 0.11585E-03 0.18770 20 31 7.500 9.00 -0.900 -0.03600 0.75000 0.15000E-03 0.33576 12 32 8.648 4.50 -1.317 -0.02529 0.09250 0.12518E-03 0.13736 20 33 10.123 4.00 -1.611 -0.03645 0.11694 0.13034E-03 0.16474 22 37 9.071 4.50 -1.408 -0.02180 0.04434 0.13173E-03 0.17548 21 39 10.438 4.00 -1.678 -0.04284 0.82360 0.13394E-03 0.10882 20 40 10.559 4.00 -1.679 -0.04517 0.90224 0.12215E-03 0.19414 21 41 8.142 4.00 -1.218 -0.00863 0.39981 0.12397E-03 0.18955 22 42 9.400 10.00 -1.400 -0.03600 0.75000 0.15000E-03 0.33467 12 43 7.372 4.50 -1.073 -0.00119 0.72129 0.12954E-03 0.21126 22 45 8.612 5.00 -1.329 -0.00971 0.84397 0.14126E-03 0.07114 22 46 8.172 4.00 -1.238 -0.00299 0.08014 0.13609E-03 0.19217 22 47 8.055 4.00 -1.085 -0.03461 0.56014 0.11641E-03 0.25505 13 48 8.655 4.50 -1.299 -0.02892 0.29307 0.11950E-03 0.15894 22 49 8.419 4.00 -1.228 -0.03023 0.20057 0.10052E-03 0.18601 21 51 8.928 4.00 -1.355 -0.02495 0.65819 0.11629E-03 0.20093 22 54 8.735 4.50 -1.335 -0.01811 0.19625 0.12976E-03 0.19223 20 55 9.294 4.50 -1.416 -0.04027 0.33908 0.17025E-03 0.14452 12 56 8.572 4.00 -1.294 -0.02030 0.97227 0.13192E-03 0.17817 22 57 8.907 9.00 -1.369 -0.01761 0.80135 0.13222E-03 0.10672 22 58 8.629 4.00 -1.282 -0.03729 0.59448 0.22645E-03 0.12402 12 59 9.107 4.50 -1.395 -0.01977 0.68997 0.12267E-03 0.18267 21 60 9.272 5.00 -1.408 -0.04199 0.85654 0.11579E-03 0.20739 22 61 9.239 4.50 -1.394 -0.04204 0.97849 0.10763E-03 0.16084 21 TABLE 17 (continued) STN NBR K(1) K(2) K(3) K(4) K(5) K(6) dox n 62 8.899 8.00 -1.318 -0.03501 0.33276 0.15050E-03 0.16301 10 63 9.468 10.00 -1.495 -0.00804 0.98786 0.14314E-03 0.08236 21 66 9.377 4.00 -1.477 -0.01029 0.35603 0.13980E-03 0.20116 23 67 8.866 6.50 -1.302 -0.05731 0.38414 0.98862E-04 0.16167 23 68 9.666 7.00 -1.539 -0.05715 0.70477 0.60321E-03 0.17746 12 69 6.939 5.00 -0.789 -0.10126 0.65270 0.35727E-04 0.20522 21 71 8.420 7.00 -1.220 -0.03124 0.03001 0.10541E-03 0.13972 22 72 9.122 7.00 -1.377 -0.03174 0.62800 0.11280E-03 0.18488 20 75 9.600 4.00 -1.514 -0.00501 0.86646 0.14139E-03 0.20482 23 77 8.135 4.50 -1.118 -0.05922 0.94853 0.36330E-04 0.14840 10 78 9.515 4.00 -1.497 -0.00887 0.79461 0.14148E-03 0.07669 23 79 7.588 4.50 -0.996 -0.06477 0.00080 0.72885E-04 0.15632 22 80 7.352 11.50 -1.035 -0.00070 0.32658 0.12954E-03 0.12665 22 81 8.085 10.00 -1.123 -0.04882 0.09085 0.74130E-04 0.09479 12 82 8.978 4.00 -1.405 -0.01642 0.69154 0.15006E-03 0.12764 18 83 9.033 7.50 -1.400 -0.00065 0.74911 0.14806E-03 0.12517 20 84 2.204 5.50 0.290 -0.19604 0.31706 0.18185E-03 0.18605 11 87 9.579 4.00 -1.516 -0.00077 0.68334 0.15170E-03 0.24743 23 89 6.396 8.00 -0.850 -0.00155 0.70775 0.13731E-03 0.23418 23 90 6.692 5.50 -0.805 -0.06733 0.17446 0.61515E-04 0.23437 22 91 8.596 10.00 -1.300 -0.00013 0.60384 0.14717E-03 0.22087 23 92 8.347 5.00 -1.146 -0.04137 0.23471 0.14593E-04 0.18880 12 93 8.785 7.00 -1.336 -0.00028 0.80655 0.14838E-03 0.09346 22 94 9.532 7.00 -1.495 -0.00075 0.70964 0.15125E-03 0.19109 20 95 11.468 6.00 -1.911 -0.01291 0.77412 0.16731E-03 0.23867 22 96 6.409 7.00 -0.729 -0.03693 0.11306 0.10841E-04 0.12173 12 97 10.893 4.00 -1.730 -0.05168 0.57916 0.11548E-03 0.31288 22 98 5.557 4.00 -0.552 -0.09634 0.21763 0.52523E-04 0.27154 22 99 4.254 4.00 -0.258 -0.11902 0.29200 0.88222E-05 0.13664 11 100 9.801 6.00 -1.498 -0.02847 0.61098 0.31736E-03 0.24018 11 101 2.635 4.00 0.241 -0.02757 0.75817 0.11936E-03 0.15955 8 102 3.075 6.50 0.006 -0.13997 0.25742 0.14322E-03 0.13704 8 103 3.035 6.00 -0.046 -2.01790 0.47425 0.84172E-04 0.10521 8 104 4.181 4.00 -0.099 -0.04098 0.77975 0.10948E-03 0.11980 8 106 2.907 6.50 0.054 -0.09441 0.24966 0.11797E-03 0.07823 10 109 6.697 5.50 -0.869 -0.04593 0.19676 0.33967E-03 0.20713 8 110 4.637 4.50 -0.377 -0.07659 0.22883 0.34088E-03 0.27937 10 111 4.401 5.00 -0.267 -0.06183 0.22249 0.93693E-04 0.10553 7 112 12.962 5.00 -2.341 -0.01813 0.37623 0.10047E-02 0.10977 6 113 3.121 9.00 0.000 -0.11125 0.09626 0.32518E-04 0.23107 12 114 2.460 10.00 0.135 -0.19090 0.22880 0.29243E-04 0.24413 19 115 5.027 6.00 -0.416 -0.08754 0.09586 0.57401E-04 0.18011 24 116 1.771 10.00 0.319 -2.83890 0.48070 0.11283E-03 0.18744 8 117 3.608 4.00 -0.117 -0.23891 0.34958 0.56453E-04 0.17931 9 118 3.072 4.00 0.004 -0.17242 0.26132 0.31683E-04 0.18890 14 119 7.111 9.00 -0.901 -0.03454 0.08394 0.11226E-03 0.22834 23 124 4.554 10.00 -0.325 -0.07275 0.08706 0.54370E-04 0.21894 19 125 5.296 10.00 -0.580 -0.00038 0.36196 0.13564E-03 0.22973 21 126 7.715 4.50 -1.030 -0.00271 0.75214 0.41146E-04 0.10723 13 131 0.087 6.00 1.011 -0.31566 0.91766 0.21432E-04 0.23240 13 APPENDIX 1 HYDROCHEMISTRY CRUISE LABORATORY REPORT Clodagh Moy, Stephen Bray and Neale Johnston This hydrochemistry was part of the CLIVAR program on Voyage 3 on the Aurora Australis. Seawater samples were analysed for salinity, nutrients (NO2+NO3, Si and P) and dissolved oxygen concentrations. Samples were collected from 135 stations in total, including 122 stations of a repeat north-south transect of the SR3 line (including 8 particle station sites) and a further 13 stations off the coast near the Mertz Glacier and across the continental shelf. Additional samples were analysed for some scientists on board, as described below. The methods used are described in the CRC hydrochemistry manual (Curran and Bray, 2003). Number of samples analysed Salinities: 2288 (2246 samples for SR3 and particle stations) Dissolved Oxygens: 2002 Nutrients: 2746 (2269 samples for SR3 and particle stations) A1.1. SALINITY Clodagh Moy and Neale Johnston analysed salinities over a 24-hour period each day in the wet lab. A Guildline Autosal salinometer SN 62549 was used. Ocean Scientific IAPSO standard seawater batches used to standardise the salinometer throughout the cruise are summarised in Table A1.1. Repeat standardisations (e.g. P137 measured against P137) showed no difference (i.e. 2R of < 0.00000) over 33 repeats during the cruise. P133 standards were also measured. They showed no difference, average being 0.0000 psu. Additional standards P140 were measured. They showed no difference, average being 0.0000 psu. There were some problems controlling the temperature of the wet lab for a number of days during the cruise. The temperature ranged between 17 and 21 degrees. A PID temperature controller was used to control the temperature and an independent air-conditioner in the wet lab. Maintaining stable air temperature proved difficult with this air-conditioner, and a close eye was kept on the temperature at all times. Analysis stopped if fluctuations in ambient temperature exceeded 1 degree. Table A1.1: Summary of IAPSO Standard Seawater (ISS) batches used for salinometer standardisations during cruise AU0103. CTD station number ISS batch number 1-7 P133 8-9 P137 10-13 P133 and P137 14-29 P137 30 P133 31-36 P133 and P140 37-42 P140 43-45 P133 46-88 P140 89-115 P133 116-119 P140 120-125 P133 126-128 P140 129-135 P133 Files updated: sal_std_check.xls sal62549.xls A1.2. DISSOLVED OXYGEN Dissolved oxygen analyses were performed by Stephen Bray in the wet lab. There were no major problems with the DO system. Standardisation and blank values were collated from this and previous cruises, and plotted to help identify outlying or suspicious values. The average standardisation value and average standard deviation was 4.425 +/- 0.002 ml of thiosulphate. This is 297.7 +/- 0.14 µmol/l of oxygen, or 0.04%. The average blank value and average standard deviation were 0.006 +/- 0.001 ml of thiosulphate. Files: do_std&blank.xls, a9901 do_std&blank.xls, all (collation of DO standardisation values) do_std&blank.xls, charts (charts of standardisation values) do.xls, variable summary do.xls, hydro_calc_check A1.3. NUTRIENTS Clodagh Moy and Neale Johnston analysed nutrients, timing autoanalyser runs to keep the instrument running over the full 24 hours each day. Phosphate, silicate, nitrite + nitrate were analysed as per CSIRO methods (Cowley, 2001, and Cowley and Johnston, 1999). A new automatic switching valve system was used to change over from reagents to MQ and carrier etc., and included a baseline calibration. Standards were made up every couple of days in low nutrient seawater (collected from Maria Island and filtered and autoclaved, before going on the cruise). The Carrier was Artificial Seawater (or sodium chloride in MQ). New software called 'Winflow' was used, which was user friendly and flexible. A standard run included a baseline calibration using the switching valves, taking approximately 45 mins, followed by a set of standards, some SRMs (Standard Reference Material from Ocean Scientific) and QCs (LNSW spiked with nutrients), and a set of 48 samples followed by a second set of standards, SRMs and QCs. A run normally took about 3 hours to complete. At the beginning of the cruise there were some problems with the nitrate analyses, resulting in bad peak shapes for NO2/NO3. After much experimentation to trace the problem, the batch of HCl and brij used to make up the reagents was changed - this fixed the problem. Trouble was also experienced with a bad batch of Cd coils (3 coils were used over a two week period). A separate batch brought from CSIRO was then used, with one coil lasting 2 weeks, as expected. Near the end of the cruise the nitrite/nitrate line leaked over the nitrate detector near the exit of the flow cell. The detector began smoking and burning. The motherboard was destroyed and the detector was no longer usable, useful only for spare parts. An additional minor problem occurred with another detector - it would not zero and kept sitting on wait. The Antarctic Division electronics engineer replaced a transistor with one from the burnt detector, fixing the problem. Data processing was time consuming, with the procedure as follows for each run: • first the winflow files are tidied up; • pick peaks and check the standards, SRMs and QCs; • check the baselines; • data are then exported to Excel to be further processed; • using the Fyyvvrr.xlt macro to process the data, import the n,s,p files; • check the 3-baseline median's (green boxes) and pick the median baseline number; • check the standards, SRM and QC values; • check the standard curves and % recovery of the cd coil for N. When happy with the run, a summary sheet was produced and exported to a *.xlw file for import into HYDRO (a MS-Excel based program for hydrochemistry data handling). Once imported into HYDRO, a csv file was made. A1.4. GENERAL DATA HANDLING Plots were made of property versus station to check for suspicious data or wrongly entered data. They were based on the data in the CSV file, and were opened via the macro CSV in A0103.XLM. Data was backed up to 250MB Iomega Zip disks. A1.5. LABORATORIES The salinometer, DO system and nutrient systems were all in the wet lab. The MQ system was in the photo lab. The wet lab and the photo lab were received in clean condition. The salinometer was on the aft bench, starboard side, near the porthole. The nutrient system was on the remaining aft bench. The DO system was on the starboard sorting bench. The port side bench near the door to the trawl deck was used to prepare reagents and runs for the nutrients. The fish bowl contained the data computer, stationary and manuals. A1.6. TEMPERATURE MONITORING AND CONTROL Temperature in the wet lab was controlled by an independent air conditioner on the starboard side bulkhead and by a CAL Controls Ltd 'CAL 9900' proportional derivative plus integral (PID) temperature controller. The photo lab had no temperature controller. The ships heating inlets above the salinometer were taped closed. The temperature from the air-conditioner fluctuated from 11 to 18 degrees. This caused the temperature controller to struggle when down at the lower temperatures, and resulted in one of the heaters blowing its fuse from over-heating. The air conditioner was monitored regularly to reduce large fluctuations in temperature. The photo lab was heated by the ship's air- conditioning and maintained a steady temperature. Two Tinytalk units recorded the laboratory temperature in the wetlab. One was positioned beside the salinometer, while the other was positioned beside the DO system. The temperature was also measured by a digital thermometer above the salinometer and the temperature monitored by the PID controller in the wet lab. 'Indoor/outdoor' electronic thermometers were used to measure the fridge and freezer. The air temperature about the salinometer was generally 20.0 +/- 1°C. A1.7. PURIFIED WATER A new RO system was bought before the voyage, instead of using the MBDI tanks. The system seemed to work well. However, some air locks were experienced from time to time and the tanks in the polisher emptied. A lot of people were using our MQ system and about 280L (~14 x 20L carboys) of water was produced for this cruise. Pre-filters were changed three times, and the polishers once. A1.8. ADDITIONAL SAMPLES ANALYSED Apart from the main CTD hydrochemistry program, a number of samples were analysed for other scientists on board, as described below: Additional salinities were analysed for the following people: Andrew Davidson, AAD: 1 sample; Kelly Goodwin, NOAA: 6 samples; Nicolas Savoye, VUB: 11 samples; Bronte Tilbrook, CSIRO: 24 samples. Additional nutrients were analysed for the following people: Phil Boyd, Alkali: 49 samples; Pete Sedwick, BBSR: 120 samples; Malcolm Reid, Alkali: 10 samples; Karl Safi, NIWA: 41 samples; Guido Corno, IASOS: 15 samples; Frank Dehairs,VUB: 218 samples; Bronte Tilbrook, CSIRO: 24 samples. APPENDIX 2 DATA FILE TYPES AND FORMATS A2.1. CTD DATA • CTD no.1193 was used for station 1 to 108. CTD no. 1103 was used for stations 109 to 135. • CTD data are in text files named *.all, containing 2-dbar averaged data. An example of file naming convention: a01035020.all a = Aurora Australis 01 = year 03 = cruise number 5 = CTD instrument number 020 = CTD station number • The files consist of a 15 line header with station information (all times are UTC), followed by the data in column format, as follows: column 1 - pressure (dbar) column 2 - temperature (degrees C, T90 scale) column 3 - salinity (PSS78) column 4 - density-1000 kg/m3 column 5 - specific volume anomaly column 6 - geopotential anomaly column 7 - dissolved oxygen (µmol/l) column 8 - no. of data points used in the 2 dbar bin column 9 - standard deviation of temperature data points in the bin column 10 - standard deviation of conductivity data points in the bin columns 11,12 - fluorescence ((volts) and transmittance (if present) • All files start at 2 dbar, and there is a line for each 2 dbar value. Any missing data is filled by blank characters. • All CTD data are downcast data. • For station 76, the data in the 'fluorescence' column is actually from the copper ion selective electrode (in volts). A2.2. NISKIN BOTTLE DATA • The bottle data are contained in the a0103.bot text file, with the following columns: column 1 - station number column 2 - ctd pressure (dbar) column 3 - ctd temperature (deg. C, T90 scale) column 4 - digital reversing thermometer temperature column 5 - ctd conductivity (mS/cm) column 6 - ctd salinity (PSS78) column 7 - bottle salinity (PSS78) column 8 - phosphate (µmol/l) column 9 - nitrate (µmol/l) (i.e. total nitrate+nitrite) column 10 - silicate (µmol/l) column 11 - bottle dissolved oxygen (µmol/l) column 12 - bottle flag (1=good,0=suspicious,-1=bad,mainly relevant to bottle salinity values for CTD calibration, but not necessarily) column 13 - niskin bottle number • Columns 2, 3, 5 and 6 are all the averages of CTD upcast burst data (i.e. averages of the 10 seconds of CTD data prior to each bottle firing) • Any missing data are filled by a decimal point '.' • The file fluoro.lis contains the same data as a0103.bot, except that there is a line of data for all 24 rosette positions, and for all station numbers, with null values represented by -9. An additional last column contains CTD upcast burst data for fluorescence. A2.3. STATION INFORMATION A summary of the station information is contained in the a0103.sta file (this station information is also included in the matlab file a0103.mat), containing position, time, bottom depth and maximum pressure of cast for CTD stations. The CTD instrument number is specified in the file header. Position and time (UTC) are specified at the start, bottom and end of the cast, while the bottom depth is for the start of the cast. A2.4. MATLAB FORMAT • CTD 2 dbar data and bottle data are also contained respectively in the matlab files a0103.mat and a0103bot.mat. a0103.mat includes station information. • In the matlab files, column number for each array corresponds with CTD station number. • In the matlab files, NaN is a null value. • In the bottle file, the rows 1 to 24 are the shallowest to deepest Niskins respectively. • For the file a0103.mat, the array names have the following meaning: (all times are UTC) 'start' refers to start of cast 'bottom' refers to bottom of cast 'end' refers to end of cast 'decimal time' is decimal days from 2400 on 31st Dec. 2000 (so, for example, midday on 2nd January 2001 = decimal time 1.5). 'lat' is latitude (decimal degrees, where -ve = south) 'lon' is longitude (decimal degrees, where +ve = east) 'time' is hhmm time botd = ocean depth (m) maxp = maximum pressure of the CTD cast (dbar) ctdunit = instrument serial number 'ctd' is the upcast CTD burst data, for the parameters: fluoro = fluorescence ga = geopotential anomaly npts = number of data points used in the 2 dbar bin ox = dissolved oxygen (µmol/l) press = pressure (dbar) sal = salinity (PSS78) sigma_t = density-1000 (kg/m3) sva = specific volume anomaly temp = temperature (deg.C T90) transmiss = transmissometer data, mostly suspect • For the file a0103bot.mat, the array names have the following meaning: 'ctd' refers to upcast CTD burst data, for the parameters: cond = conductivity (mS/cm) fluoro = fluorescence press = pressure (dbar) sal = salinity (PSS78) temp = temperature (deg.C T90) 'hyd' refers to bottle data, for the parameters: ox = dissolved oxygen (µmol/l) sal = salinity (PSS78) flag = the bottle flagged described under the bottle data section niskin = niskin bottle number nitrate, phosphate, silicate = µmol/l station = station number therm = digital reversing thermometer temperature (deg.C T90) A2.5. WOCE DATA FORMAT The data are also available as WOCE format files, following the standard WOCE format as described in Joyce and Corry (1994). A2.5.1. CTD 2 DBAR-AVERAGED DATA FILES • Data are contained in the files *.ctd • CTD 2 dbar-averaged file format is as per Table 4.7 of Joyce and Corry (1994), except that measurements are centered on even pressure bins (with first value at 2 dbar). • CTD temperature and salinity are reported to the third decimal place only. • The quality flags for CTD data are defined in Table A2.1. A2.5.2. BOTTLE DATA FILES • Data are contained in the file a0103.sea, with the file a0103cfc.sea including CFC data. • Bottle data file format is as per Table 4.5 of Joyce and Corry (1994), with quality flags defined in Tables A2.2 and A2.3. • The total value of nitrate+nitrite only is listed. • Silicate is reported to the first decimal place only. • CTD temperature (including theta), CTD salinity and bottle salinity are all reported to the third decimal place only. • CTD temperature (including theta), CTD pressure and CTD salinity are all derived from upcast CTD burst data; CTD dissolved oxygen is derived from downcast 2 dbar-averaged data. • Raw CTD pressure values are not reported. • SAMPNO is equal to the rosette position of the Niskin bottle. • Salinity samples rejected for conductivity calibration, as per eqn A2.20 in Rosenberg et al. (1995), are not flagged in the .sea file. A2.5.3. CONVERSION OF UNITS FOR DISSOLVED OXYGEN AND NUTRIENTS A2.5.3.1. Dissolved oxygen Niskin bottle data For the WOCE format files, all Niskin bottle dissolved oxygen concentration values have been converted from volumetric units µmol/l to gravimetric units µmol/kg, as follows. Concentration C(k) in µmol/kg is given by C(k) = 1000 C(l) / ρ(θ,s,0) (eqn A2.1) where C(l) is the concentration in µmol/l, 1000 is a conversion factor, and ρ(θ,s,0) is the potential density at zero pressure and at the potential temperature θ, where potential temperature is given by θ = θ(T,s,p) (eqn A2.2) for the in situ temperature T, salinity s and pressure p values at which the Niskin bottle was fired. Note that T, s and p are upcast CTD burst data averages. CTD data In the WOCE format files, CTD dissolved oxygen data are converted to µmol/kg by the same method as above, except that T, s and p in eqns A2.1 and A2.2 are CTD 2 dbar-averaged data. A2.5.3.2. Nutrients For the WOCE format files, all Niskin bottle nutrient concentration values have been converted from volumetric units µmol/l to gravimetric units µmol/kg using C(k) = 1000 C(l) / ρ(T(l),s,0) (eqn A2.3) where 1000 is a conversion factor, and ρ(Tl,s,0) is the water density in the hydrochemistry laboratory at the laboratory temperature Tl = 20.5°C, and at zero pressure. Upcast CTD burst data averages are used for s. A2.5.4. STATION INFORMATION FILE • Data are contained in the file a0103.sum, with the file format as per section 3.3 of Joyce and Corry (1994). • All depths are calculated using a uniform speed of sound through the water column of 1463 ms-1. Reported depths are as measured from the water surface. Missing depths are due to interference of the ship's bow thrusters with the echo sounder signal. • An altimeter attached to the base of the rosette frame (approximately at the same vertical position as the CTD sensors) measures the elevation (or height above the bottom) in metres. The elevation value at each station is recorded manually from the CTD data stream display at the bottom of each CTD downcast. Motion of the ship due to waves can cause an error in these manually recorded values of up to ±3 m. • Wire out (i.e. meter wheel readings of the CTD winch) were unavailable. Table A2.1: Definition of quality flags for CTD data (after Table 4.10 in Joyce and Corry, 1994). These flags apply both to CTD data in the 2 dbar-averaged *.ctd files, and to upcast CTD burst data in the *.sea files. flag definition 1 not calibrated with water samples 2 acceptable measurement 3 questionable measurement 4 bad measurement 5 measurement not reported 6 interpolated over >2 dbar interval 7 despiked 8 this flag not used 9 parameter not sampled Table A2.2: Definition of quality flags for Niskin bottles (i.e. parameter BTLNBR in *.sea files) (after Table 4.8 in Joyce and Corry, 1994). flag definition 1 this flag is not used 2 no problems noted 3 bottle leaking 4 bottle did not trip correctly 5 not reported 6,7,8 these flags are not used 9 samples not drawn from this bottle Table A2.3: Definition of quality flags for water samples in *.sea files (after Table 4.9 in Joyce and Corry, 1994). flag definition 1 this flag is not used 2 acceptable measurement 3 questionable measurement 4 bad measurement 5 measurement not reported 6 mean of replicate measurements 7 manual autoanalyser peak measurement 8 this flag not used 9 parameter not sampled A2.6. ADCP DATA ADCP data are available as 30 ensemble averages, contained in the following files: au010301.cny - text format, all data au0103_slow35.cny - text format, 'on station' data (i.e. data for which ship speed ≤ 0.35 ms(^-1) a0103dop.mat - matlab format, all data a0103dop_slow35.mat - matlab format, 'on station' data (i.e. data for whichship speed ≤ 0.35 ms(^-1) Full file format description is given in the text file README_au0103_adcp, included with the data. A2.7. UNDERWAY DATA Ship's underway data (including meteorological data, bathymetry, GPS, and sea surface temperature/salinity/fluorescence), quality controlled by the dotzapper (Ruth Lawless, unpublished data quality control report), are contained in the following files: clivar_underway.ora - text format, 1 minute instantaneous data clivar_underway.mat - matlab format, 1 minute instantaneous data See section 4.5 above for more details. Full file format description is given in the text file README_clivar_underway, included with the data. Note that there are a few suspiciously low sea surface salinity values near the start and end of the time series. APPENDIX 3 CFC MEASUREMENTS ON AU0103 (CLIVAR REPEAT OF P12) PRELIMINARY SHIPBOARD REPORT Mark J. Warner, University of Washington, School of Oceanography Box 355351, Seattle, WA 98195-5351 USA Phone: 206-543-0765, FAX: 206-685-3351, E-mail: mwarner@ocean.washington.edu Co-investigator: John L. Bullister, NOAA-PMEL Building 3, 7600 Sand Point Way, Seattle, WA 98115 USA Phone: 206-526-6741, FAX: 206-526-6744, E-mail: bullister@pmel.noaa.gov A3.1. CFC SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND DATA PROCESSING Analysts: Mark J. Warner, University of Washington Fred A. Menzia, Joint Institute for the Study of Atmosphere and Ocean Concentrations of three dissolved chlorofluorocarbons (CFC-11, CFC-12, and CFC- 113) were measured in approximately 1350 samples during this section. The sampling procedure and analytical techniques are based upon those described by Bullister and Weiss (1988). Samples for CFC analyses were drawn from the 10- liter Niskins into 100 cm3 ground glass syringes fitted with stainless steel syringe tips. These syringes were stored in a water bath until analyses. A portable laboratory on the heli-deck housed the analytical instrumentation. Underway measurement of atmospheric CFC concentrations was accomplished by pumping air from the bow through approximately 100 m of 3/8-in Dekaron tubing into the CFC portable laboratory. The separation of the CFCs was accomplished using a 46 cm Porasil B, 80/100 mesh precolumn followed by a 1.5 m Carbograph 1AC column in a Shimadzu Mini-2 gas chromatograph. Shipboard electron capture gas chromatography was used to measure CFC concentrations in air, seawater, and gas standards during the expedition. In general, the precision of the measurements was outstanding during this expedition. The precisions for the response of the detector to injection of an approximately 3.7 cm(^3) loop of gas standard 33790 (CFC-11: 265.04 parts per trillion, CFC-12: 525.04 ppt, CFC-113: 82.84 ppt) was 1.04% for CFC-11, 0.63% for CFC-12, and 3.14% for CFC-113 over the entire cruise. Two calibration curves were used for the cruise and show relatively small differences (less than 1% difference in sensitivity over most of the range). Atmospheric concentrations for the CFCs showed very little variation, either temporally or spatially, during the cruise. The mean atmospheric mixing ratios on the SIO93 calibration scale are: CFC-11: 253.09±1.58 ppt CFC-12: 538.03±1.95 ppt CFC-113: 78.51±1.14 ppt Seawater samples have been corrected for blanks introduced through the analytical system. A residual contamination existed in the valve at the top of the sparging chamber. These blanks, although relatively high, were also fairly constant and reduced during the course of the expedition. The preliminary measurements have not been corrected for any contamination introduced from the Niskin bottles or the sampling procedure. These will be determined from a careful examination of the seawater CFC concentrations at the northern end of the section. Approximately 35 duplicate syringes were sampled and analysed to determine precision for seawater measurements. The calculated precisions are listed below; whichever is smaller, the concentration or percentage, applies to the data: CFC-11: ±0.0022 pmol kg(^-1) or 0.74% CFC-12: ±0.0016 pmol kg(^-1) or 0.74% CFC-113: ±0.0040 pmol kg(^-1) or 2.7% These data exceed the precision established for CFC-11 and CFC-12 as WOCE standards. (No standard was set for CFC-113.) A3.2. ANALYTICAL PROBLEMS Prior to CTD 17, a small leak existed in the portion of the system used for analyses of standard gas and bow air samples but not in the portion of the system used for seawater samples. This resulted in apparently high seawater concentrations and surface saturations of CFCs. Shortly before finding this leak, the electrometer on the Shimadzu Mini-2 Gas Chromatograph had been replaced due to poor temperature control for the oven. This complicates the ability to correct the seawater data from CTDs 1-12, since the new electrometer also altered the amplified signal from the ECD. For this preliminary data report, the post-leak calibration curve has been applied to all this data and the seawater concentrations multiplied by the ratio of the sensitivities for 1 large gas sample volume before the leak and after the leak. Prior to fixing the leak, the precision of measured CFC-113 concentrations in the gas standards was too poor to attempt to measure seawater concentrations. CFC-113 concentrations are only reported after CTD 16. A small amount of contamination was introduced to the analytical system through the use of a lubricating spray in the deadbolt on the van door. The baseline drifted upward and became very noisy for 1.5 days. Low-concentration samples of CFC-113 are suspect (WOCE flag = 3) during this period (CTD 60-2) due to baseline noise. The signal-to-noise is much greater for both CFC-11 and CFC-12, so these gases appear to be unaffected by the problem. A few samples showed obvious signs of contamination and have been flagged as bad (WOCE flag = 4). There may be other suspect data which have yet to be identified and flagged. APPENDIX 4 INTER-CRUISE COMPARISONS A4.1. INTRODUCTION Inter-cruise comparisons for data collected along the SR3 transect during the 1990s are described in Rosenberg et al. (1997). Comparisons are extended here to include this latest occupation of SR3. Brief comparisons of salinity, dissolved oxygen and nutrient data are made between au0103 data and data from cruises au9601 (August-September 1996) and au9404 (January-February 1995). Overlapping stations from the three cruises (Table A4.1) were selected with the requirement of a spacial separation less than 3 nautical miles. In most cases, spacial separation is in fact less than 1 nautical mile. Meridional sections of neutral density (McDougall, 1987) are shown in Figures A4.1a to c, including CTD station positions. Table A4.1: Stations from each cruise used for parameter comparisons (latitudes are for au0103). Latitude Latitude (degrees) au010 au9601 au9404 (degrees) au0103 au9601 au9404 -44.0027 2 69 106 -52.3717 45 37 - -44.0537 3 68 - -52.6672 46 36 83 -44.1165 4 67 105 -53.1312 48 35 82 -44.3692 5 66 - -54.0687 54 33 80 -44.7225 6 65 103 -54.5320 56 32 79 -45.2192 7 64 102 -55.0162 57 31 78 -45.7337 9 63 101 -55.4802 59 30 77 -46.1687 10 62 100 -55.9217 60 29 - -46.6432 11 61 99 -56.4260 61 28 - -47.1480 13 60 - -56.9322 63 27 75 -47.4440 19 59 97 -57.8525 66 25 - -47.9993 20 58 - -58.8493 67 23 - -48.3187 21 57 95 -59.3490 69 22 - -49.2715 26 55 93 -59.8367 71 21 71 -49.6083 28 54 - -60.3502 72 20 - -49.8930 29 46 - -60.8362 75 19 - -50.1620 30 45 - -61.3185 78 18 69 -50.6718 33 43 89 -61.8502 79 17 68 -51.2592 39 41 - -62.3497 80 16 67 -51.5380 40 40 - -62.8432 82 15 66 -51.8095 41 39 85 -63.3705 83 - 65 -52.0853 43 38 - -64.5207 90 12 - A4.2. SALINITY The meridional variation of the salinity maximum (i.e. for Lower Circumpolar Deep Water, as defined by Gordon, 1967) is compared for the three cruises. Using the 2 dbar averaged CTD salinity data, differences are formed between the deep water salinity maxima for the cases au0103-au9601, au0103-au9404, and au9601-au9404 (Figure A4.2). A mean difference value is included with each figure. (Note that temperatures at the deep salinity maximum are above zero, thus au0103 salinities here are unaffected by the conductivity error at depth for subzero waters, discussed in section 5.1.1). For each cruise pairing, several outliers are omitted - these outliers are due either to curtailing of the vertical salinity profile by the bottom, or change in vertical profile character due to the movement of fronts (Figures A4.1a to c). Note that for au9601-au9404, a similar comparison was done in Rosenberg et al. (1997), giving a mean difference value of -0.004 (PSS78). The slightly different value here of -0.0033 (PSS78) is due to the omission of outliers. The au0103-au9601 comparison (Figure A4.2) shows salinity correspondence between the 2 cruises within 0.001 (PSS78). For both these cruises, Guildline Autosal salinometers were used for analysis of salinity Niskin bottle samples. The au0103-au9404 and au9601-au9404 differences of approximately -0.003 (Figure A4.2) are larger. These consistently larger differences are due to the less accurate YeoKal salinometer used on au9404, as discussed in Rosenberg et al. (1997). In an earlier comparison between cruises au9601 and me9706 (in Rosenberg et al., 1997), with Guildline salinometers used on both these cruises, a mean difference of -0.002 (PSS78) was found. The larger magnitude of this difference compared to the au0103-au9601 value is attributed to a standardisation offset on cruise me9706, possibly due to unstable laboratory temperature. A4.3. NISKIN BOTTLE DATA Dissolved oxygen and nutrient bottle data from cruises au0103, au9601 and au9404 are compared on neutral density surfaces. Neutral density values are calculated using a routine by David Jackett (CSIRO Division of Marine Research, Hobart); oxygen and nutrient bottle data are interpolated onto neutral density surfaces using a routine by Serguei Sokolov (CSIRO Division of Marine Research, Hobart) (using bilinear interpolation). Station pairings are as per Table A4.1. Note that only data below 1000 dbar are used - this excludes from the comparisons the most seasonally varying data, as well as data in the highest vertical gradients. Meridional variations of parameter differences on 10 neutral density (i.e. γ) surfaces are shown as follows: • Figure A4.3 for dissolved oxygen, • Figure A4.4 for phosphate, • Figure A4.5 for nitrate+nitrite, • Figure A4.6 for silicate. For each parameter, differences are shown for the cases au0103-au9601, au0103- au9601, and au9601-au9404. A4.3.1. DISSOLVED OXYGEN For all three cruises, oxygen bottle samples were analysed using the automated titration system developed by Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (Knapp et al., 1990). From Figures A4.3a to c, au0103 oxygen values are mostly higher than values for au9601 and au9404, while au9601 values are mostly higher than au9404. For density surfaces 27.8 to 28.3 over the latitude range 47 to 64°S, the following mean differences (with standard deviations) are found: au0103-au9601 2.2 µmol/l ± 2.29 µmol/l au0103-au9404 4.2 µmol/l ± 1.73 µmol/l au9601-au9404 2.1 µmol/l ± 2.33 µmol/l From Appendix 1, oxygen standardisation values for au0103 were reasonably stable (±0.14 µmol/l). For au9601, a jump in standardisation values was noted after station 40 (Rosenberg et al., 1997), i.e. after latitude ~51.5°S. This jump, of the order 2 µmol/l, is not obvious in the comparisons shown in Figures A4.3a and c. A4.3.2. PHOSPHATE From the inter-cruise comparisons in Rosenberg et al. (1997), au9601 phosphate values were found to be lower than all earlier cruises by ~0.1 µmol/l, and confirmation of the assumed improvement of phosphate data for au9601 was required from a future cruise. From Figures A4.4a to c, au0103 and au9601 phosphates are both consistently lower than au9404. For density surfaces 27.8 to 28.3 over the latitude range 47 to 64°S, the following mean differences (with standard deviations) are found: au0103-au9601 0.00 µmol/l ± 0.046 µmol/l au0103-au9404 -0.11 µmol/l ± 0.028 µmol/l au9601-au9404 -0.11 µmol/l ± 0.046 µmol/l Although there is some scatter about the mean zero au0103-au9601 phosphate difference (Figure A4.4a), the standard deviation value is only ~1.5% of full scale (where full scale = 3.0 µmol/l), and phosphate values appear mostly consistent for au0103 and au9601 south of 48°S. This confirms the improvement in phosphate analytical methods for au9601 and au0103, compared with earlier cruises, with the error in earlier cruises due to the phosphate analysis 'carryover effect' discussed in Rosenberg et al. (1997). North of ~48°S, au0103 phosphate is higher than au9601 by ~0.06 µmol/l (Figure A4.4a). A4.3.3. NITRATE+NITRITE Inter-cruise comparisons for nitrate+nitrite (Figures A4.5a to c) are not as simple to summarise as phosphate. The clearest trends are north of 49°S and south of 61°S, where nitrate+nitrite concentrations are (from highest to lowest): au0103, au9404, au9601. Between 49 and 61°S, differences are in general scattered about zero, except for au0103-au9601 which is mostly positive between 54 and 61°S (Figure A4.5a). For all density surfaces over all latitudes, the following mean differences (±standard deviations) are found: latitude range 45 - 49°S au0103-au9601 1.07 µmol/l ± 0.40 µmol/l au0103-au9404 0.34 µmol/l ± 0.34 µmol/l au9601-au9404 -0.59 µmol/l ± 0.46 µmol/l latitude range 49 - 54°S au0103-au9601 0.23 µmol/l ± 0.69 µmol/l au0103-au9404 -0.09 µmol/l ± 0.74 µmol/l au9601-au9404 -0.02 µmol/l ± 0.66 µmol/l latitude range 54 - 61°S au0103-au9601 0.28 µmol/l ± 0.29 µmol/l au0103-au9404 0.12 µmol/l ± 0.38 µmol/l au9601-au9404 0.06 µmol/l ± 0.60 µmol/l latitude range 61 - 65°S au0103-au9601 1.15 µmol/l ± 0.26 µmol/l au0103-au9404 0.39 µmol/l ± 0.26 µmol/l au9601-au9404 -0.74 µmol/l ± 0.17 µmol/l The largest scatter for all three cruises is between 49 and 54°S, where standard deviations in the above table are ~2% of full scale (where full scale = 35 µmol/l). A4.3.4. SILICATE Silicate concentrations for au0103 are mostly higher than for au9601 and au9404 (Figures A4.6a and b), while values for au9601 and au9404 appear mostly consistent, with no significant offset (Figure A4.6c). For all density surfaces over all latitudes, the following mean differences (± standard deviations) are found: au0103-au9601 4.0 µmol/l ± 3.5 µmol/l au0103-au9404 5.8 µmol/l ± 3.2 µmol/l au9601-au9404 0.9 µmol/l ± 4.0 µmol/l For silicate, the standard deviation values are all higher than 2% of full scale (where full scale = 150 µmol/l). So overall the inter-cruise scatter of silicate values is higher than for the other nutrients, confirmed by close inspection of individual stations (Bronte Tilbrook, CSIRO Division of Marine Research, personal communication). REFERENCES Aoki, S., Rintoul, S.R. and Ushio, S., 2005a. Freshening of the Adelie Land Bottom Water along 140E. Geophysical Research Letters (submitted). Aoki, S., Rintoul, S.R., Hasumoto, H. and Kinoshita, H., 2005b. Frontal positions and mixed layer evolution in the seasonal ice zone along 140E in 2001-2. Deep-Sea Research (submitted). Bullister, J.L. and Weiss, R.F., 1988. Determination of CCl3F and CCl2F2 in seawater and air. Deep-Sea Research, Vol. 35 (5), pp839-853. Cardinal, D., Alleman, L.Y., Dehairs, F., Savoye, N., Trull, T.W. and André, L., 2005a. Relevance of silicon isotopes to fingerprint Si-nutrient utilization and water masses in the Southern Ocean. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 19, GB2007, doi:10.1029/2004GB002364. Cardinal, D., SAvoye, N., Trull, T.W., André, L., Kopczynska, E.E. and Dehairs, F., 2005b. Variations of carbon remineralisation in the Southern Ocean illustrated by the Baxs proxy. Deep-Sea Research I Vol. 52, pp355-370. Cowley, R., 2001. A practical manual for the determination of salinity, dissolved oxygen, and nutrients in seawater. CSIRO Division of Marine Research report, 2001. Cowley, R. and Johnston, N., 1999. Investigations into the chemistry used for orthophosphate analysis in seawater. CSIRO Division of Marine Research report, July 1999. Curran, C and S. Bray, 2003. A Practical manual for the determination of Salinity, Dissolved Oxygen and Nutrients in Seawater. Antarctic CRC Research Report, 2003. Gordon, A.L., 1967. Structure of Antarctic waters between 20oW and 170oW. Antarctic Map Folio Series, Folio 6, Bushnell, V. (ed.). American Geophysical Society, New York. Jacquet, S.H.M., Dehairs, F. and Rintoul, S., 2004. A high resolution transect of dissolved barium. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 31 (14): Art. No. L14301. Jacquet, S., de Brauwere, A., Dehairs, F., Elskens, M., Jeandel, C., Metzl, N., Rintoul, S. and Trull, T., 2005. Comparison of dissolved Barium with Nutrients and Physico-chemical conditions along 30oE and 145oE across the Southern Ocean, EGU 2005, Vienna, abstract. Joyce, T. and Corry, C. (editors), 1994. Requirements for WOCE Hydrographic Programme Data Reporting. WHP Office Report WHPO 90-1, Revision 2, WOCE Report No. 67/91, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. 144 pp. (unpublished manuscript). Knapp, G.P., Stalcup, M.C., and Stanley, R.J., 1990. Automated Oxygen Titration and Salinity Determination. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Technical Report WHOI-90-35. McDougall, T.J., 1987. Neutral surfaces. Journal of Physical Oceanography Vol. 17, pp1950-1964. Rintoul, S.R. and Bullister, J.L., 1999. A late winter hydrographic section from Tasmania to Antarctica. Deep-Sea Research I Vol. 46, pp1417-1454. Rosenberg, M., Eriksen, R., Bell, S., Bindoff, N. and Rintoul, S., 1995. Aurora Australis marine science cruise AU9407 - oceanographic field measurements and analysis. Antarctic Cooperative Research Centre, Research Report No. 6, July 1995. 97 pp. Rosenberg, M., Bray, S., Bindoff, N., Rintoul, S., Johnston, N., Bell, S. and Towler, P., 1997. Aurora Australis marine science cruises AU9501, AU9604 and AU9601 - oceanographic field measurements and analysis, inter-cruise comparisons and data quality notes. Antarctic Cooperative Research Centre, Research Report No. 12, September 1997. 150 pp. Rosenberg, M., unpublished. Aurora Australis ADCP data status. Antarctic Cooperative Research Centre, unpublished report, November 1999. 51 pp. Rosenberg, M., Bindoff, N., Bray, S., Curran, C., Helmond, I., Miller, K., McLaughlan, D. and Richman, J., 2001. Mertz Polynya Experiment, marine science cruises AU9807, AU9801, AU9905, AU9901 and TA0051 - oceanographic field measurements and analysis. Antarctic Cooperative Research Centre, Research Report No. 25, June 2001. 89 pp. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks to all scientific personnel who participated in the cruise, and to the crew of the RSV Aurora Australis. The work was supported by the Australian Government's Cooperative Research Centre (CRC) Programme through the Antarctic Climate & Ecosystems CRC, the Australian Antarctic Division (ASAC Project Number 1335), and by the Australian Greenhouse Office of the Department of Environment and Heritage through the CSIRO Climate Change Science Program. CORE PARTICIPANTS Australian Antarctic Division University of Tasmania CSIRO Marine & Atmospheric Research Australian Bureau of Meteorology SUPPORTING PARTICIPANTS Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research Australian Greenhouse Office Australian National University National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Silicon Graphics International Tasmanian Department of Economic Development ADDRESS ACE CRC Private Bag 80 Hobart, Tasmania Australia 7001 P +61 3 6226 7888 F +61 3 6226 2440 E enquiries@acecrc.org.au www.acecrc.org.au Established and supported under the Australian Government's Cooperative Research Centres Programme CCHDO DATA PROCESSING NOTES DATE CONTACT DATA TYPE EVENT ---------- ---------- ----------- ----------------------------------------- 03/01/2007 Rosenberg CTD/BTL/SUM Submitted Have just "uploaded" 5 Southern Ocean Aurora Australis cruises to your website. 09AR0103_woce.zip (SR3 i.e. P12) 09AR0106_woce.zip (Amery Ice Shelf part 1, no WOCE ID) 09AR0207_woce.zip (Amery Ice Shelf part 2, no WOCE ID) 09AR0304_woce.zip (includes a transect close to I08S) 09AR0403_woce.zip (I09S, plus repeat of transect close to I08S) • For the last of these, 09AR0403, CFC data were measured but are not yet available (should have included that in the notes I entered to your website). • Carbon data (DIC, alkalinities etc.) are available for some of these cruises - will get them to you at a later date. File: 09AR0103_woce.zip Type: zipped ctd/bottle data Status: Public Name: Rosenber, Mark Institute: ACE CRC Country: Australia Expo: 09AR0103 Line: SR3 Date: 10/2001 Action: Place Data Online Notes: • WOCE format files • pdf data report includes data quality information 06/01/2007 BARTOLOCCI CTD/BTL/SUM Data Reformatted/Online Reformatting notes for sr03_p12 sent by Mark Rosenburg: SUM: • Changed expocode from 09AR0103/1 to 09AR20011029. • removed zero from missing lat/lon columns to leave blank. (zero value was not at equator, but missing value) • Added name/date stamp. • Ran sumcheck. Only warnings were missing lat/lon for specific stations. SEA: • Changed expocode from 09AR0103/1 to 09AR20011029. • Added name/date stamp. • Ran wocecvt, with no errors. Warnings for duplicate depth/press only. CTD: • Added name/date stamp. • Changed expocode from 09AR0103/1 to 09AR20011029. • ran wctcvt. Changed the following files' dates to match the sumfile (dates of cast began on one day however majority of cast was conducted on the next day. CTD files reflect BO and EN sumfile dates). wctcvt ran with no errors after these edits. stn/cst: • 16/1 changed day from 4 to 5 • 31/1 changed day from 8 to 9 • 37/1 changed day from 9 to 10 • 42/1 changed day from 10 to 11 • 69/1 changed day from 18 to 19 • 97/1 changed day from 27 to 28 To Make Exchange: The following edits were made to the sumfile in order to convert files into exchange format: • removed all cast code entries with no navigation information. BO cast codes for station/casts: 34/1, 35/1, 36/1, 37/1, 38/1 49/1, 50/1, 60/1, 135/1 • removed all dashes representing missing values. • filled in any empty SECT ID spaces with UNK. Exchange bottle and CTD files were then created successfully.