CRUISE REPORT: ACT2013
(Updated AUG 2017)





Highlights



                           Cruise Summary Information

          WOCE Section Designation  ACT2013
Expedition designation (ExpoCodes)  316N20130213
                   Chief Scientist  Dr. Lisa Beal / RSMAS
                             Dates  2013 FEB 13 - 2013 MAR 03
                              Ship  R/V Knorr
                     Ports of call  Cape Town, South Africa 


                                                  33° 20' 42" S
             Geographic Boundaries  27° 28' 40" E               28° 53' 42" E
                                                  35° 43' 48" S

                          Stations  57
      Floats and drifters deployed  0 deployed, 5 recovered
    Moorings deployed or recovered  7 recovered

                              Contact Information:
                                 Dr. Lisa Beal
                        RSMAS/MPO • University of Miami
             4600 Rickenbacker Causeway • Miami, FL 33149 • MSC 328
                Tel: 305.421.4093 • Email: lbeal@rsmas.miami.edu























1  Overview

Following a 1,000 m test cast (998/01), a total of 57 full-depth 
Rosette/CTD/LADCP casts were collected between 15 February 2013 and 28 February 
2013. Figure 1 shows that these 57 stations were broken up into two synoptic 
sections, a time series, and a section that was broken up due to mooring 
recovery and a weather day. Each cast included water samples (up to 12), CTD 
(pressure, temperature, conductivity, dissolved oxygen) and LADCP (direct 
velocity) data to within 5 to 40 m off the bottom.


2  Instrumentation

The CTD package consisted of a 24-place carousel (Sea-Bird SBE32), with 12 
10.0L Niskin bottles mounted on a 24-bottle rosette frame. Underwater CTD 
components included an SBE9plus CTD (S/N 830 for stations 1-9 and S/N 462 for 
stations 10-57) consisting of a Paroscientific Digiquartz pressure sensor 
(S/N 58952 for stations 1-9; S/N 99676 for stations 10-57), dual SBE3plus 
temperature sensors (S/N 03P-2333 and 03P-4532 for stations 1-9; S/N 03P-4360 
and 03P-2774 for stations 10-57), dual SBE4C conductivity sensors (S/N 04-
1744 and 04-2115 for stations 1-9; S/N 04-3042 and 04-3089 for stations 10-
57), an SBE43 dissolved oxygen sensor (S/N 43-1136 for stations 1-9; S/N 43-
0113 for stations 10-57), and one or two altimeters (Tritech 250m for station 
1; Benthos 100m for stations 2-5; Tritech 250m for stations 5-9; Benthos 100m 
for stations 5-57). The CTD, altimeter(s) and LADCP battery pack were mounted 
horizontally at the bottom of the rosette frame. A downward-looking 150 kHz 
LADCP was mounted horizontally to one side of the bottom of the rosette 
frame, and an upward-looking 300 kHz LADCP was mounted horizontally along one 
edge of the top of the rosette frame. A UNOLS-standard three-conductor 0.322 
electromechanical sea cable suspended the rosette package and frame. Each CTD 
cast was monitored using an SBE11 deck unit inside the ships main lab.


3  Operations

Preparation for each cast began 15-45 minutes prior to CTD deployment. 
Preparation included emptying and cocking the 12 Niskin bottles, closing all 
bottle valves, and removing any tubing. Once the bridge notified the deck 
watch that the ship was on station, the CTD rosette was brought out of the 
hangar using an air-powered cart and tracks and positioned below the squirt 
boom on the starboard deck. Once in position, the deck leader would alert the 
winch to pull up any slack in the wire. At this point, the console operator 
would turn on the SBE11 deck unit and turn on data acquisition. The deck 
watch would then string tag lines through the arms of the rosette frame and 
secure them to cleats located on the deck. Ratchet straps connecting the 
frame to the air-powered cart were then removed, and the deck leader would 
signal the winch operator to lift the CTD. As the boom extended, the deck 
watch reduced package swing by keeping the tag lines tight. Once the CTD was 
in the water, tag lines were removed and the package was brought to 10-m. 
Once the console operator determined that primary and secondary sensors were 
within reasonable agreement (± 0.001), he or she would instruct the winch 
operator to bring the package to the surface to zero the wire reading and 
then begin descent at 60 m min−1.

During the last 100-m of the cast, determined using a combination of 
multibeam and Knudsen depths combined with the wire difference with depth, 
the console operator instructed the winch operator to slow to 30 m min^(−1). 
If at 50-m above the bottom, the altimeter had yet to kick in (which was 
often the case), the console operator would instruct the winch to slow to 15 
m/min. In most cases, the altimeter kicked in approximately 20-30 m of the 
bottom and would be used to get to a final depth of 10m off the bottom.


Figure 1: Breakdown of station locations for February 2013 Agulhas Current Time 
          Series cruise (ACT0213). Each panel gives the bathymetry in colors 
          using the color bar on the right-hand side, as well as station 
          locations as black dots. Every other station is labeled in text next 
          to its location. The top left panel shows the first synoptic section 
          (station 1-20); the top right panel shows the cross-section broken up 
          in time by mooring recoveries and in space by a weather day (stations 
          21-33); the bottom left panel shows the second synoptic section 
          (stations 34-46); and the bottom right panel shows the location of 
          the time series (stations 47-57).


During the upcast, between 3 and 12 bottle samples were collected. Note that 
all 12 bottles were tripped during each cast to ensure even weight 
distribution of the rosette upon recovery, but that not all 12 were sampled. 
The first bottle was always tripped at the bottom, and last was tripped 
within 30-m of the surface. In between, bottles were tripped at staggered 
depths between each cast. Prior to tripping the bottle, the console operator 
waited at least 30 s to make sure that the rosette’s shed wake had 
dissipated. After tripping, the console operator waited at least 10 s to 
ensure adequate time for the SBE35 to take a reading. 

After all bottles had been tripped, the console operator would instruct the 
winch to bring the rosette to the surface and that the package was ready for 
recovery. At this point, the control would be given to the deck watch and the 
winch operator. The deck watch would set up poles and snap hooks attached to 
tag lines. The deck leader would instruct the winch operator to bring the 
package out of the water. The deck watch would then hook the frame and use 
tuggers to take the slack out of the tag lines as the rosette was lowered 
onto the air-powered cart. Once on deck, the console operator would stop data 
acquisition. The package was then secured to the cart using ratchet straps, 
and the cart was moved into the hangar where the deck watch would proceed to 
draw salinity and oxygen samples. 


4  Data Acquisition and Processing 

The data acquisition setup included three PCs running Linux. One of these 
PCs, designated the console, was connected to the deck unit. The console was 
used to observe incoming data using graphical displays, as well as to trigger 
bottles. During each cast, shipboard CTD data processing and backups were 
performed automatically. The automatic data processing consisted of applying 
laboratory calibrations for pressure, temperature and conductivity. Upon 
completion of any one cast, a series of data processing steps took place 
manually. This included checking the 0.5 s time series data for calibration 
shifts and consistency (comparing the primary and secondary sensors). Then, a 
2-db pressure series was created from the down cast only. Salinity and Oxygen 
data was compared along isopycnal surfaces between up and down casts as well 
as with adjacent stations. Vertical cross-sections of temperature, salinity, 
and oxygen were plotted and checked for consistency. Both the 2-db pressure 
series and the 0.5 s time series were then placed on the shipboard cruise 
website. 


5  Issues Affecting Data Quality 

Prior to beginning the test cast (998/01), the 12-place carousel that was 
installed on the CTD package was replaced with a 24-hook carousel (S/N 
3231095-0450) so that the lanyard lines did not interfere with the LADCP 
signal. In order to change the carousel, a new cable was spliced to work with 
the 24-hook configuration. During the test cast, there were several bugs in 
the CTD acquisition software, which were fixed after the cast was completed. 
Once the rosette was back on deck it was noted that almost all of the spigots 
were not closed completely. 

During bottom station 001/01 bottom approach, the altimeter (Tritech 250m S/N 
221666) did not work. During the upcast when bottle 6 was fired (wire out: 
3180), the system froze. It was observed that the Reset button on the CTD box 
was pushed accidentally. The computer was restarted and the remaining upcast 
was saved as 001/02. Following the cast, the Tritech altimeter was switched 
out for a Benthos altimeter (S/N: 1182). During the next casts bottom 
approach (002/01), the altimeter worked off and on, ultimately kicking in 
around 50 m off the bottom. The signal was still noisy so that a plot of the 
altimeter was necessary to gauge distance off the bottom. At the bottom of 
the cast, bottles 1 and 2 were both fired (2 fired accidentally by operator). 
For stations 003/01 and 004/01 the altimeter worked off and on, but for 
station 005/01 it appeared as though the altimeter was not kicking in at all 
and so the cast was stopped 25 m above the bottom. After the cast, it was 
realized that the Knudsen depth was not sound speed corrected and was 
probably giving a depth about 20 m shallower than the actual depth. However, 
the altimeter was switched out for a second Benthos altimeter (S/N 41631), 
and the Tritech (S/N 221666) was added back on as a secondary altimeter 
sensor. During station 006/01 bottom approach, the Tritech again didn't work. 
The Benthos kicked in at 20-m off the (sound-speed corrected) bottom. It was 
decided that we should slow down to 15 m/min descent rate close to the bottom 
to allow the altimeter to kick in. 

During station 008/01 upcast, bottles 22-24 did not trip. Though the operator 
pushed the trip button, the bottles were still cocked upon recovery. It was 
noted that on the bottle trip screen, bottles 22-24 showed a negative 
confirmation. During station 009/01 upcast, bottles 18-24 did not trip. 
Initially, the problem was believed to be a software issue because the 
program was not closing the bottles. It was eventually discovered that one of 
the wire ties connecting the new altimeters cable to the package was close to 
the splice in the manufactured cable, and was probably interrupting the 
signal. During station 010/01, a trial bottle trip at 10-m did not work so 
the CTD was recovered and the CTD replaced with one from WHOI (S/N 462). The 
WHOI CTD was configured for a 24-hook rosette and do did not need the spliced 
cable. However, it lacked a cable for the SBE 35. During the cast, a new 
cable to connect the SBE 35 was being manufactured. Therefore, there was no 
SBE 35 for cast 010/01. The WHOI rosette also did not allow for two 
altimeters so the Tritech (S/N 221666) was removed. During 010/01, 
temperature 1 and 2, and conductivity 1 and 2 both differed from each other 
by about 0.1. After the cast, it was realized that a tube was left on the 
rosette and connected to the oxygen sensor, meaning that the oxygen data 
collected was corrupted. This tube also corrupted both primary sensors 
(temperature and conductivity), so that all viable temperature and 
conductivity data for 010/01 comes from the secondary sensors only. Following 
this diagnosis, the sensors were flushed. During cast 011/01, the cable to 
reconnect the SBE35 was still not ready, but it was reconnected for cast 
012/01. 

During cast 014/01, the wire difference with depth was 180 m so the down cast 
was terminated 20 m off the bottom. During 016/01 and 032/01, Bottle 24 was not 
fired due to operator error. During 041/01 bottom approach, the screen showing 
wire out, tension, etc. flashed off and on, the altimeter did not kick in, the 
Knudsen depth was unreliable, and the multibeam depth was fluctuating between 
3125 and 3210 m. Therefore, there was no way to know distance off the bottom. 
Final uncorrected depth was 3014-m (showing 3380 at cast bottom), and maximum 
rosette depth was 3157-m. Similarly, during bottom approach of cast 054/01, 
there was a large wire angle and more than 300 m excess wire let out (wire out 
of 2030 for depth of 1693). Final distance above bottom was 40 m. Again, during 
bottom approach of cast 049/01, wire difference with depth was growing 
exponentially. Over 50-m of wire was let out and the rosette dropped less than 
10-m. Cast bottom uncorrected depth was 1667, and the rosette maximum depth was 
1679 m. Altimeter was working but was probably angled due to excess wire, and 
final distance above bottom was 19-m. 

During the down cast of 048/01, the winch stopped at 119 wire out at a depth 
of 116- m. The ship repositioned to change its heading and speed to correct a 
large wire angle. Cast resumed at 9:56 GMT. During the cast 049/01 upcast, 
the bridge asked the winch to slow to 20 m/min because the winch block was 
bouncing up and down. After slowing, the block slowly stopped jumping but the 
wire angle became large. After correcting for the wire angle, the winch 
increased speed and the block began to jump again. After slowing again to 
stop the jumping, the cast resumed normally. After recovery on deck, it was 
noted that the wire was beginning to separate and it was switched out for a 
second wire. Shortly after deployment for cast 056/01, it was noticed that 
the winch block was jumping again. The winch was stopped at 591 m wire out 
until the vibrations stopped. 

After restarting, the jumping started up again and the winch stopped at 638 m 
wire out until the vibrations stopped. Again, as soon as the winch started up 
again, the block began to jump. The block bounced off and on with a large wire 
angle. The bridge instructed the winch to slow to 40 m min−1 to try and correct 
the jumping. By 1000 m wire out, the jumping was mostly gone and the remainder 
of the downcast was taken at 40 m min−1. There were no issues during the upcast 
and winch speed was 60 m min−1 throughout the up cast. 

   
6  Preliminary Results 

Figures 2 through 4 show temperature, salinity and oxygen respectively for 
both synoptic lines. These lines were sampled continuously and give a 
synoptic view of water mass properties across the Agulhas Current. Figure 5 
shows temperature and salinity for the time series data (stations 47-57).


Figure 2: Temperature cross-sections for stations 1-20 (top) and stations 34-
          46 (bottom) of the first and second synoptic sections from ACT0213. 
          Colors show temperature in "C using the color bar on the right.

Figure 3: Salinity cross-sections for stations 1-20 (top) and stations 34-46 
          (bottom) of the first and second synoptic sections from ACT0213. 
          Colors show salinity using the color bar on the right.

Figure 4: Oxygen cross-sections for stations 1-20 (top) and stations 34-46 
          (bottom) of the first and second synoptic sections from ACT0213. 
          Colors show oxygen in μmol/kg using the color bar on the right.

Figure 5: Temperature and Salinity (offset by 1) for stations 47 through 57 
          from left to right. Start time for each cast is given by the top axis 
          starting on 27 February 2013 and ending on 28 February 2013.













                                   ACT0213
                              R/V Knorr, KN197-6

                      13 February 2013 to 03 March 2013
               Cape Town, South Africa - Cape Town, South Africa
                        Chief Scientist: Dr. Lisa Beal
             Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science.















                                 Cruise Report

                                 02 March 2013
                              Data Submitted by:
   Oceanographic Data Facility, Computing Resources and Research Technicians
       Shipboard Technical Support/Scripps Institution of Oceanography
                            La Jolla, CA 92093-0214











Summary

A hydrographic survey consisting of Rosette/CTD/LADCP sections, underway 
shipboard ADCP in the Agulhas was carried out early 2013. The R/V Knorr 
departed Cape Town, South Africa on 13 February 2013.

57 Rosette/CTD/LADCP casts were made. Water samples (up to 12) and CTD data 
were collected on each Rosette/CTD/LADCP cast, usually made to within 5-40 
meters of the bottom. Salinity, dissolved oxygen samples were analyzed for up 
to 12 water samples from each cast of the principal Rosette/CTD/LADCP 
program. Concurrent temperature, conductivity, dissolved oxygen measurements 
were made at the time samples were taken.

The cruise ended in Cape Town, South Africa 03 March 2013.
 

Description of Measurement Techniques

1. CTD/Hydrographic Measurements

ACT0213 Hydrographic measurements consisted of salinity, dissolved oxygen 
water samples taken from most of the 57 Rosette casts. Pressure, temperature, 
conductivity/salinity, dissolved oxygen, data were recorded from CTD 
profiles. The distribution of samples is shown in the following 4 figures.


Figure 1.0: ACT0213 Sample distribution, stations 1-20.

Figure 1.0: ACT0213 Sample distribution, stations 21-33.

Figure 1.0: ACT0213 Sample distribution, stations 34-46

Figure 1.0: ACT0213 Sample distribution, stations 47-57



1.1.  Water Sampling Package

Rosette/CTD/LADCP casts were performed with a package consisting of a 12-
bottle rosette frame (SIO/STS), a 12-place carousel (SBE32) and 12 10.0L 
Niskin bottles (SIO/STS). Underwater electronic components consisted of a 
Sea-Bird Electronics SBE9plus CTD with dual pumps (SBE5), dual temperature 
(SBE3plus), single dual conductivity (SBE4C), dissolved oxygen (SBE43), 
altimeter.

The CTD was mounted vertically in an SBE CTD cage attached to the bottom of 
the rosette frame and located to one side of the carousel. The SBE4C 
conductivity, SBE3plus temperature and SBE43 dissolved oxygen sensors and 
their respective pumps and tubing were mounted in the CTD cage, as 
recommended by SBE. Pump exhausts were attached to the sensor bracket on the 
side opposite from the sensors. The altimeter was mounted on the inside of 
the bottom frame ring. The 300 KHz LADCP (RDI) was mounted vertically on one 
side of the frame between the bottles and the CTD as well as above the CTD. 
Its battery pack was mounted on the bottom of the frame.

The rosette system was suspended from a UNOLS-standard three-conductor 0.322" 
electro-mechanical sea cable. The sea cable was terminated at the beginning 
of ACT. Reterminations were performed prior to station 30 when a kink was 
found in the winch wire just above termination. Kink was from an unknown 
source. The R/V Knorr’s DESH-6 winch was used for all casts.

The deck watch prepared the rosette 10-30 minutes prior to each cast. The 
bottles were cocked and all valves, vents and lanyards were checked for 
proper orientation. Once stopped on station, the rosette was moved out from 
the forward hanger to the deployment location under the squirt-boom using an 
airpowered cart and tracks. The CTD was powered-up and the data acquisition 
system started from the computer lab. The rosette was unstrapped from the 
air-powered cart. Tag lines were threaded through the rosette frame and 
syringes were removed from CTD intake ports. The winch operator was directed 
by the deck watch leader to raise the package. The squirt-boom and rosette 
were extended outboard and the package was quickly lowered into the water. 
Tag lines were removed and the package was lowered to 10 meters, until the 
console operator determined that the sensor pumps had turned on and the 
sensors were stable. The winch operator was then directed to bring the 
package back to the surface, re-zero the wire-out reading, and begin the 
descent.

Most rosette casts were lowered to within 5-40 meters of the bottom, using 
the altimeter, winch pay-out, CTD depth and echosounder depth to determine 
the distance.

For each up cast, the winch operator was directed to stop the winch between 
3-12 standard sampling depths. These depths were staggered every station. To 
insure package shed wake had dissipated, the CTD console operator waited 30 
seconds prior to tripping sample bottles. An additional 10 seconds elapsed 
before moving to the next consecutive trip depth, to allow the SBE35RT time 
to take its readings.

Recovering the package at the end of the deployment was reverse of launching, 
with the additional use of poles and snap-hooks to attach tag lines. The 
rosette was secured on the cart and moved into the aft hanger for sampling. 
The bottles and rosette were examined before samples were taken, and anything 
unusual was noted on the sample log.

Each bottle on the rosette had a unique serial number, independent of the 
bottle position on the rosette. Sampling for specific programs was outlined 
on sample log sheets prior to cast recovery or at the time of collection.

Routine CTD maintenance included soaking the conductivity and oxygen sensors 
in fresh water between casts to maintain sensor stability.

 
1.2. Navigation and Bathymetry Data Acquisition   

Navigation data was acquired at 1-second intervals from the ship’s GP90 GPS 
receiver by a Linux system beginning February 13, 2013.

The bottom depths reported in the data transmittal files were recorded on the 
Console Logs during acquisition, and later input manually into the postgreSQL 
database. Knudsen depths were typically reported, unless depth data were not 
available.

 



1.3.  Underwater Electronics   

An SBE35RT reference temperature sensor was connected to the SBE32 carousel 
and recorded a temperature for each bottle closure. These temperatures were 
used as additional CTD calibration checks.

The SBE9plus CTD was connected to the SBE32 24-place carousel providing for 
single-conductor sea cable operation. The sea cable armor was used for ground 
(return). Power to the SBE9plus CTD (and sensors), SBE32 carousel, Benthos 
PSA-916 100m altimeter and Tritech 250m altimeter.


Table 1.3.0:  ACT0213 Rosette Underwater Electronics.

Instrument/Sensor            Mfr./Model                 Serial        A/D      Stations 
                                                        Number        Channel  Used
———————————————————————————  —————————————————————————  ————————————  ———————  ————————
Carousel Water Sampler       Sea-Bird SBE32 (24-Pl.)    3231095-0450  n/a      1-57
CTD                          Sea-Bird SBE9plus          830           n/a      1-9
Pressure                     Paroscientific Digiquartz  58952         n/a      1-9
CTD                          Sea-Bird SBE9plus          462           n/a      10-57
Pressure                     Paroscientific Digiquartz  99676         n/a      1-9
Primary Temperature (T1)     Sea-Bird SBE3plus          03P-2333      n/a      1-9
Primary Temperature (T1)     Sea-Bird SBE3plus          03P-4360      n/a      10-57
Primary Conductivity (C1)    Sea-Bird SBE4C             04-1744       n/a      1-9
Primary Conductivity (C1)    Sea-Bird SBE4C             04-3042       n/a      10-57
Dissolved Oxygen             Sea-Bird SBE43             43-1136       Aux4/V6  1-9
Dissolved Oxygen             Sea-Bird SBE43             43-0113       Aux3/V5  10-57
Primary Pump                 Sea-BirdSBE5T              05-3245       n/a      1-9
Primary Pump                 Sea-BirdSBE5T              05-5284       n/a      10-57
Secondary Temperature (T2)   Sea-Bird SBE3plus          03P-4532      n/a      1-9
Secondary Temperature (T2)   Sea-Bird SBE3plus          03P-2774      n/a      10-57
Secondary Conductivity (C2)  Sea-Bird SBE4C             04-2115       n/a      1-9
Secondary Conductivity (C2)  Sea-Bird SBE4C             04-3089       n/a      10-57
Secondary Pump               Sea-Bird SBE5T             05-2788       n/a      1-9
Secondary Pump               Sea-Bird SBE5T             05-3107       n/a      10-57
Altimeter                    Tritech, 250m              221666        Aux3/V4  1
Altimeter                    Benthos, 100m              1182          Aux3/V4  2-5
Altimeter                    Benthos, 100m              1247          Aux3/V4  5-57
Altimeter                    Tritech, 250m              221666        Aux2/V2  5-9
Reference Temperature        Sea-Bird SBE35             35-0034       n/a 1-8  12-57
Deck Unit (in lab)           Sea-Bird SBE11             11P-0384      n/a      1-57





1.4.  CTD Data Acquisition and Rosette Operation

The CTD data acquisition system consisted of an SBE-11plus (V2) deck unit and 
two networked generic PC workstations running CentOS-5.8 Linux. Each PC 
workstation was configured with a color graphics display, keyboard, trackball 
and DVD+RW drive. One system had a Comtrol Rocketport PCI multiple port 
serial controller providing 8 additional RS-232 ports. The systems were 
interconnected through the ship’s network. These systems were available for 
real-time operational and CTD data displays, and provided for CTD and 
hydrographic data management.

One of the workstations was designated the CTD console and was connected to 
the CTD deck unit via RS-232. The CTD console provided an interface and 
operational displays for controlling and monitoring a CTD deployment and 
closing bottles on the rosette. The website and database server and maintain 
the hydrographic database for ACT. Redundant backups were managed manually.

Once the deck watch had deployed the rosette, the winch operator lowered it 
to 10 meters. The CTD sensor pumps were configured with a 5-second startup 
delay after detecting seawater conductivities. The console operator checked 
the CTD data for proper sensor operation and waited for sensors to stabilize, 
then instructed the winch operator to bring the package to the surface and 
descend to a specified target depth (pay-out). The profiling rate was no more 
than 60m/min depending on sea cable tension and sea state.

The progress of the deployment and CTD data quality were monitored through 
interactive graphics and operational displays. Bottle trip locations were 
transcribed onto the console and sample logs. The sample log was used later 
as an inventor y of samples drawn from the bottles. The altimeter channel, 
CTD depth, winch pay-out and bathymetric depth were all monitored to 
determine the distance of the package from the bottom, allowing a safe 
approach at depth.

Bottles were closed on the up cast by operating an on-screen control. The 
winch operator was given a target pay-out for the bottle stop, proceeded to 
that depth and stopped.

After the last bottle was closed, the console operator directed the deck 
watch to bring the rosette on deck. Once the rosette was on deck, the console 
operator terminated the data acquisition, turned off the deck unit and 
assisted with rosette sampling.


1.5.  CTD Data Processing   

Shipboard CTD data processing was performed automatically during each 
CTD/rosette/LADCP deployment using SIO/ODF CTD processing software during 
data acquisition for CTD/rosette/LADCP deployments. The raw CTD data were 
converted to engineering units, filtered, response-corrected, calibrated and 
decimated to a more manageable 0.5-second time series. The laboratory 
calibrations for pressure, temperature and conductivity were applied at this 
time. The 0.5-second time series data were used for real-time graphics during 
deployments, and were the source for CTD pressure and temperature associated 
with each rosette bottle. Both the raw 24 Hz data and the 0.5-second time 
series were stored for subsequent processing. During the deployment, the data 
were backed up to another Linux workstation.

At the completion of a deployment a sequence of processing steps was 
performed automatically. The 0.5-second time series data were checked for 
consistency, clean sensor response and calibration shifts. A 2-decibar 
pressure series was then generated from the down cast. Both the 2-decibar 
pressure series and 0.5-second time series data were made available for 
downloading, plotting and reporting on the shipboard cruise website.

CTD/rosette data were routinely examined for sensor problems, calibration 
shifts and deployment or operational problems. The primary and secondary 
temperature sensors (SBE3plus) were compared to each other and to the SBE35 
temperature sensor. CTD conductivity sensors (SBE4C) were compared to each 
other, then calibrated by examining differences between CTD and check sample 
conductivity values. The CTD dissolved oxygen sensor data were calibrated to 
check sample data. Additional Salinity and O2 comparisons were made with 
respect to isopycnal surfaces between down and up casts as well as with 
adjacent deployments. Vertical sections were made of the various proper ties 
derived from sensor data and checked for consistency.

The primary temperature and conductivity sensors were used for reported CTD 
temperatures and conductivities.


1.6.  CTD Acquisition and Data Processing Problems   

Station 001/01 was reset midway through up-cast at 3175m on a 4700m cast 
after the fourth bottle had been triggered. The cast was restarted and the 
two resulting data files were concatenated and a 9-minute lag was removed 
from the meta data files. The 4 initial bottles triggered for the restart 
cast were omitted along with 9min lag for reporting and fitting purposes but 
preserved in backup data files. The reset continued to be problematic for 
bottle data alignment against the CTD values at same depth. The low gradient 
region bottles were coded questionable and omitted from fitting routine.

The Tritech altimeter was used on cast 001/01 and again from casts 005/01-
009/01. It held a steady 5V signal throughout casts without typical noise 
disruption. It is believed the signal was not recognized by the acquisition 
software. 3 Benthos model 916s were employed on all casts. Benthos S/N 1182 
was used 002/01-005/01, S/N 41631 for casts 005/01-009/01. Benthos 1182 
responded at depths < 30m above bottom. It is believed that casts were 
reaching depths > 30m off bottom due to a large error in Knudsen system 
settings thus the initial S/N 1182 had not performed consistently.

After station 009/01 cable communications failed to the carousel on the 
eighth consecutive bottle trigger. After review of casts 008/01 it was found 
a similar communications failure had been noted by console operator for trips 
11 and 12 and miss reported as lanyard misalignment by deck technicians. In 
the interest of saving time a back-up CTD was used for the remainder of the 
cruise, casts 010/01-057/01. After 009/01 SBE35RT was returned to use on cast 
0012/01 once an adapter cable could be constructed for the alternate 
CTD/carousel unit.

After the alternate CTD was put in use it was found that the primary plumb 
line had not been connected through SBE43 to SBE5T. Initially it was believed 
the software configuration files were incorrect. Secondary temperature and 
conductivity were sound fit and reported. Dissolved oxygen was not reported 
for cast 010/01.

Numerous miss-trips were noted on console logs and omitted from fitting 
routine.


1.7.  CTD Sensor Laboratory Calibrations

Laboratory calibrations of the CTD pressure, temperature, conductivity and 
dissolved oxygen sensors were performed prior to ACT0213. The calibration 
dates are listed in table 1.7.0.








Table 1.7.0:  ACT0213 CTD sensor laboratory calibrations.

Sensor                                S/N            Calibration 
                                                 Date         Facility
————————————————————————————————————  —————————  ———————————  ————————
Paroscientific Digiquartz Pressure    830/99686  15 Nov 2012  STS/ODF
Sea-Bird SBE3plus T1 Temperature      03P-2333   08 Nov 2012  STS/ODF
Sea-Bird SBE3plus T2 Temperature      03P-4532   06 Nov 2012  STS/ODF
Sea-Bird SBE4C C1 Conductivity        04-1744    07 Dec 2012  SBE
Sea-Bird SBE4C C2 Conductivity        04-2115    07 Dec 2012  SBE
Sea-Bird SBE43 Dissolved Oxygen       43-1136    06 Dec 2012  SBE
Sea-Bird SBE35 Reference Temperature  35-0034    12 Dec 2012  STS/ODF
Paroscientific Digiquartz Pressure    462/58952  15 Mar 2012  SBE
Sea-Bird SBE3plus T1 Temperature      03P-4532   21 Dec 2012  SBE
Sea-Bird SBE3plus T2 Temperature      03P-2774   21 Dec 2012  SBE
Sea-Bird SBE4C C1 Conductivity        04-3042    29 Nov 2012  SBE
Sea-Bird SBE4C C2 Conductivity        04-3089    29 Nov 2012  SBE
Sea-Bird SBE43 Dissolved Oxygen       43-0113    18 Dec 2012  SBE
Sea-Bird SBE35 Reference Temperature  35-0034    12 Dec 2012  STS/ODF



1.8.  CTD Shipboard Calibration Procedures

During ACT CTD set up 830 was used for CTD/rosette/LADCP casts 1-9, and CTD 
set up 462 for stations 10-57

The SBE35RT Digital Reversing Thermometer (S/N 3528706-0034) served as an 
independent calibration check for T1 and T2 on stations 1-9 and 12-57 In-situ 
salinity and dissolved O2 check samples collected dur ing each cast were used 
to calibrate the conductivity and dissolved O2 sensors.

Rapid variability in the environment observed on many of the deployments in 
sensor and check sample comparisons. An additional metric of typical 
variability was inferred from comparing primary and secondary temperature 
data. This metric was used to filter check sample comparisons for calibration 
purposes.

1.8.1.  CTD Pressure

The Paroscientific Digiquartz pressure transducer (S/N ?????) was calibrated 
in ??? 20?? at the STS/ODF Calibration Facility.

Conversion coefficients for both Paroscientific Digiquarts pressure 
transducers provided with-in calibrations reports were used to convert 
frequencies to pressure. Calibration correction slope and offset were then 
applied to pressures during each cast. Pre- and post-cast on-deck/out-of-
water pressure offsets varied from -0.1 to -0.3db for 830 CTD setup (stations 
1-9). Pre- and post-cast on-deck/out-of water pressure offsets varied from -
1.3 to +3.5db for the 462 CTD setup (stations 10-57).

1.8.2.  CTD Temperature

Calibration coefficients derived from the pre-cruise calibrations, plus 
shipboard temperature corrections determined during the cruise, were applied 
to raw primary and secondary sensor data during each cast.

A single SBE35RT was used as a tertiary temperature check. It was located 
equidistant between T1 and T2 with the sensing element aligned in a plane 
with the T1 and T2 sensing elements. The SBE35RT Digital Reversing 
Thermometer is an internally-recording temperature sensor that operates 
independently of the CTD. It is triggered by the SBE32 carousel in response 
to a bottle closure. According to the manufacturer’s specifications, the 
typical stability is 0.001°C/yr. The SBE35RT on ACT was set to internally 
average over an 8 second period.

Two independent metrics of calibration accuracy were examined. At each bottle 
closure, the primary and secondary temperature were compared with each other 
and with the SBE35RT temperatures.

Note that a temperature slope of 0.00024 was applied to each sensor to 
convert from the ITS-90 calibration to IPTS-68. Reported sensor data have 
been converted to ITS-90.

Due to alternate CTD configuration, temperature calibrations for 1-9 were 
applied independent of calibra-tion for stations 10-57.  

All corrections made to CTD temperatures had the form:

                                         2
                          T    = T + tp P + tp P + t
                           cor         2      1     0

Residual temperature differences after correction are shown in figures 
1.8.2.0 through 1.8.2.1.


Figure 1.8.2.0: T1-T2 by station (-0.01°C ≤ T1 -T2 ≤ 0.01°C).

Figure 1.8.2.1: SBE35RT-T1 by station (-0.01°C ≤ T1 -T2 ≤ 0.01°C).

Figure 1.8.2.2: Deep T1-T2 by station (Pressure > 1000dbar).

Figure 1.8.2.3: Deep SBE35RT-T1 by station (Pressure > 1000dbar).

Figure 1.8.2.4: T1-T2 by pressure (-0.01°C ≤ T1 -T2 ≤ 0.01°C).

Figure 1.8.2.5: SBE35RT-T1 by pressure (-0.01°C ≤ T1 -T2 ≤ 0.01°C).


The 95% confidence limits for the mean low-gradient (typically pressure > 
1000dbar) bottle differences are ± 0.000494°C for T1-T2, ± 0.000995°C for 
SBE35R T-T1.

1.8.3.  CTD Conductivity

Calibration coefficients derived from the pre-cruise calibrations were 
applied to convert raw frequencies to conductivity. Shipboard conductivity 
corrections, determined during the cruise, were applied to primary and 
secondary conductivity data for each cast.

Corrections for both CTD temperature sensors were finalized before analyzing 
conductivity differences. Two independent metrics of calibration accuracy 
were examined. At each bottle closure, the primary and secondary conductivity 
were compared with each other. Each sensor was also compared to conductivity 
calculated from check sample salinities using CTD pressure and temperature.

The differences between primar y and secondary temperature sensors were used 
as filtering criteria to reduce the contamination of conductivity comparisons 
by package wake. The coherence of this relationship is shown in figure 
1.8.3.0.


Figure 1.8.3.0:  Coherence of conductivity differences as a function of 
                 temperature differences.


Uncorrected conductivity comparisons are shown in figures 1.8.3.1 through 
1.8.3.3.


Figure 1.8.3.1: Uncorrected C1 -C2 by station (-0.01°C ≤ T1 -T2 ≤ 0.01°C).

Figure 1.8.3.2: Uncorrected CBottle -C1 by station (-0.01°C ≤ T1-T2 ≤ 0.01°C).

Figure 1.8.3.3: Uncorrected CBottle -C2 by station (-0.01°C ≤ T1-T2 ≤ 0.01°C).


First-order time-dependent drift corrections (changing conductivity offset 
with time) were determined for each sensor. After applying the drift 
corrections, second-order pressure responses were evident for each 
conductivity sensor.

CBottle - CCTD differences were then evaluated for response to temperature 
and/or conductivity, which typically shifts between pre- and post-cruise SBE 
laboratory calibrations. Temperature and conductivity
responses essentially showed the same picture, so each sensor was fit to 
conductivity response. Both C1 and C2 required a second-order correction.

After conductivity responses were corrected, the pressure-dependent 
correction for C1 required a minor adjustment to flatten out the deep end.

The residual differences after correction are shown in figures 1.8.3.4 
through 1.8.3.12.


Figure 1.8.3.4: Corrected C1 - C2 by station (-0.01°C ≤ T1-T2 ≤ 0.01°C).

Figure 1.8.3.5: Corrected CBottle - C1 by station (-0.01°C ≤ T1-T2 ≤ 0.01°C).

Figure 1.8.3.6: Corrected CBottle - C2 by station (-0.01°C ≤ T1-T2 ≤ 0.01°C).

Figure 1.8.3.7: Corrected C1 - C2 by pressure (-0.01°C ≤ T1-T2 ≤ 0.01°C).

Figure 1.8.3.8: Corrected CBottle - C1 by pressure (-0.01°C ≤ T1-T2 ≤ 0.01°C).

Figure 1.8.3.9: Corrected CBottle - C2 by pressure (-0.01°C ≤ T1-T2 ≤ 0.01°C).

Figure 1.8.3.10: Corrected C1 - C2 by conductivity (-0.01°C ≤ T1-T2 ≤ 0.01°C).

Figure 1.8.3.11: Corrected CBottle - C1 by conductivity (-0.01°C ≤ T1-T2 ≤ 0.01°C).

Figure 1.8.3.12: Corrected CBottle - C2 by conductivity (-0.01°C ≤ T1-T2 ≤ 0.01°C).


Corrections made to all conductivity sensors had the form:


                               2             2     2
                C    = C + cp P + cp P + cp C + c C + c + c
                 cor         2      1      0     2     1   0


Only CTD and bottle salinity data with "acceptable" quality codes are 
included in the differences.


Figure 1.8.3.13: Salinity residuals by station (-0.01°C ≤ T1-T2 ≤ 0.01°C).

Figure 1.8.3.14: Salinity residuals by pressure (-0.01°C ≤ T1-T2 ≤ 0.01°C).

Figure 1.8.3.15: Salinity residuals by station (Pressure > 2000db)


Figures 1.8.3.14 and 1.8.3.15 represent estimates of the deep salinity 
accuracy of ACT0213. The 95% confidence limits are ± 0.000777 PSU relative to 
deep bottle salinities, and ± 0.000913 PSU relative to all bottle salinities 
where T1-T2 is within ± 0.01°C.

1.8.4.  CTD Dissolved Oxygen

The DO sensors were calibrated to dissolved O2 check samples taken at bottle 
stops by matching the down cast CTD data to the up cast trip locations on 
isopycnal surfaces, then calculating CTD dissolved O2 using a DO sensor 
response model and minimizing the residual differences from the check 
samples. A non-linear least-squares fitting procedure was used to minimize 
the residuals and to determine sensor model coefficients, and was 
accomplished in three stages.

The time constants for the lagged terms in the model were first determined 
for the sensor. These time constants are sensor-specific but applicable to an 
entire cruise. Next, casts were fit individually to check sample data. 
Consecutive casts were checked on plots of Theta vs O2 to check for 
consistency.

Standard and blank values for check sample oxygen titration data were 
smoothed, and the oxygen values recalculated, prior to the final fitting of 
CTD oxygen.


Figure 1.8.4.0: O2 residuals by station (-0.01°C ≤ T1-T2 ≤ 0.01°C).

Figure 1.8.4.1: O2 residuals by pressure (-0.01°C ≤ T1-T2 ≤ 0.01°C).


A standard deviation of 1.55 umol/kg for low gradient deep CTD oxygen 
residuals is an indication of consistent dependable dissolved oxygen data.

The general form of the ODF DO sensor response model equation for Clark cells 
follows Brown and Morrison [Brow78], and Millard [Mill82], [Owen85]. ODF 
models DO sensor secondary responses with lagged CTD data. In-situ pressure 
and temperature are filtered to match the sensor responses. Time constants 
for the pressure response τp, a slow (τTf) and fast (τTs) thermal response, 
package velocity (τdP), thermal diffusion (τdT) and pressure hysteresis (τh) 
are fitting parameters. Once determined for a given sensor, these time 
constants typically remain constant for a cruise. The thermal diffusion term 
is derived by low-pass filtering the difference between the fast response (TS) 
and slow response (Tl) temperatures.

This term is intended to correct non-linearities in sensor response 
introduced by inappropriate analog thermal compensation. Package velocity is 
approximated by low-pass filtering 1st-order pressure differences, and is 
intended to correct flow-dependent response. Dissolved O2 concentration is 
then calculated:


                      Ph                                              dOc      dP
                 (C  ————)                    (C T  + C T  + C P + C  ——— + C  —— + C dT)
                   2 5000                       4 l    5 S    7 l   6 dt     8 dt    9
O ml/l = [C V   e         + C  • f   (T/P) • e
 2         1 DO              3    sat        


where:

O2ml/l     Dissolved O2 concentration in ml/l
VDO        Raw sensor output
C1         Sensor slope
C2         Hysteresis response coefficient
C3         Sensor offset
fsat(T,P)  O2 saturation at T,P (ml/l)
T          insitu temperature (°C)
P          insitu pressure (decibars)
Ph         Low-pass filtered hysteresis pressure (decibars)
Tl         Long-response low-pass filtered temperature (°C)
Ts         Short-response low-pass filtered temperature (°C)
Pl         Low-pass filtered pressure (decibars)

dOc
———        Sensor current gradient (µamps/sec)
dt

dP
——         Filtered package velocity (db/sec)
dt

dT         low-pass filtered thermal diffusion estimate (Ts - Tl)
C4 - C8    Response coefficients



1.9.  Bottle Sampling

At the end of each rosette deployment water samples were drawn from the 
bottles in the following order:
    • O2
    • Salinity
The correspondence between individual sample containers and the rosette 
bottle position (1-12) from which the sample was drawn was recorded on the 
sample log for the cast. This log also included any comments or anomalous 
conditions noted about the rosette and bottles. One member of the sampling 
team was designated the sample cop, whose sole responsibility was to maintain 
this log and ensure that sampling progressed in the proper drawing order.

Normal sampling practice included opening the drain valve and then the air 
vent on the bottle, indicating an air leak if water escaped. This observation 
together with other diagnostic comments (e.g., "lanyard caught in lid", 
"valve left open") that might later prove useful in determining sample 
integrity were routinely noted on the sample log. Drawing oxygen samples also 
involved taking the sample draw temperature from the bottle. The temperature 
was noted on the sample log and was sometimes useful in determining leaking 
or mis-tripped bottles.

Once individual samples had been drawn and properly prepared, they were 
distributed for analysis. Oxygen and salinity analyses were performed on 
computer-assisted (PC) analytical equipment networked to the data processing 
computer for centralized data management.


1.10.  Bottle Data Processing

Water samples collected and properties analyzed shipboard were centrally 
managed in a relational database (PostgreSQL 8.1.23) running on a Linux 
system. A web service (OpenACS 5.5.0 and AOLServer 4.5.1) front-end provided 
ship-wide access to CTD and water sample data. Web-based facilities included 
on-demand arbitrary proper ty-proper ty plots and vertical sections as well 
as data uploads and downloads.

The sample log (and any diagnostic comments) was entered into the database 
once sampling was completed. Quality flags associated with sampled properties 
were set to indicate that the property had been sampled, and sample container 
identifications were noted where applicable (e.g., oxygen flask number).

Analytical results were provided on a regular basis by the various analytical 
groups and incorporated into the database. These results included a quality 
code associated with each measured value and followed the coding scheme 
developed for the World Ocean Circulation Experiment Hydrographic Programme 
(WHP) [Joyc94].

Table 1.10.0 shows the number of samples drawn and the number of times each 
WHP sample quality flag was assigned for each basic hydrographic property:


Table 1.10.0:  Frequency of WHP quality flag assignments.

                              Rosette Samples Stations - 57
      —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
               Reported              WHP Quality Codes
                levels   1      2       3     4     5     7       9
      —————————————————  —     ———     ——     —     —     —     ———
      Bottle     683     0     523      0     0     0     0     159
      CTD Salt   683     0     679      3     0     0     0       0
      CTD Oxy    522     0     489     27     5     2     0     159
      Salinity   522     0     489     27     5     2     0     159
      Oxygen     509     0     508      0     0     0     0     174


Various consistency checks and detailed examination of the data continued 
throughout the cruise.



Lowered ADCP Operations
Joni Lum
28 February 2013


Instrument Set Up:

Full depth velocity profiles were captured during the 2013 ACT cruise using a 
hybrid 150kHz/300kHz LADCP Workhorse configuration. The 150kHz instrument 
(s/n # 18144) was provided by the Rosenstiel School for Marine and 
Atmospheric Science at the University of Miami, while the 300kHz instrument 
(s/n # 4897) was provided by Dan Torres of Woods Hole Oceanographic 
Institute. Two backup instruments (150kHz and 300kHz), cables, mounting 
brackets, and three custom-made 48V deep-sea batteries, were also provided by 
WHOI. The upward looking Workhorse ADCP was mounted off center of the 12-
bottle rosette, just above the upper rim. The downward looking ADCP was 
mounted off center of the frame with the face of the transducer just above 
the deck. The battery was mounted adjacent to the downward looking ADCP and 
rested on two beams mounted to the bottom of the frame and secured with a 
ratchet strap. Both instruments were connected to the single battery pack 
using a star cable.

The upward looking ADCP was configured for 20 8-meter bins with an 8-meter 
blanking distance. The downward looking ADCP was configured for 16 16-meter 
bins with a 10-meter blanking distance. Both instruments were configured for 
an ambiguity velocity of 350 cm/s and staggered single-ping ensembles. The 
upward looking ADCP was running version 50.40 firmware and set for 1 second 
ensembles. The downward looking ADCP was running version 51.40 firmware and 
set to burst-sample every 2 seconds, with 0.8 s between pings.


Data Acquisition Set Up:

Inside the main lab of the Knorr, two computers were set up for data 
acquisition and processing. The primary data acquisition computer ran Ubuntu 
and had two built-in serial ports, while the data processing computer ran 
Windows 7. The data acquisition computer ran a python-based dual terminal 
window. The initial battery charger was an American Reliance Inc. LPS-305 
programmable power supply. It was programmed to output 58V and was plugged 
into one of the long power/communication cables that ran from the acquisition 
computer to the ADCP while the rosette was on deck. After the second cast, 
the battery charger was swapped out for a Soneil 4808SRF because the initial 
charger maintained a slightly high current (0.4A to 0.6A) after 1.5 hours of 
charging. After checking the voltage before and after charging, it was 
determined that neither the battery nor the charger were malfunctioning. 
Nevertheless, the charger was swapped out for the Soneil, which was used 
without issues on the previous ACT cruise in 2011. When using the Soneil, the 
battery charger reported a 'green' or fully charged light almost immediately 
after connecting to the instruments, even on the longer casts.



Deployment and Recovery:

On 13 February 2013, a damaged cable connecting the battery to the 
instruments was found during an initial inspection of the rosette. A 1 cm 
piece of the wire's rubber jacket was missing. It appeared to have been 
shaved by a blade, exposing the cable shielding. The wire itself looked 
undamaged but the cable was replaced.

On 14 February, lowered ADCP operations began with a test cast. The blanking 
distance of the downward looking ADCP was initially set to 0 to test the 
effect of zero blanking on data quality. The effects were unclear and the 
blanking distance was set at 8 meters. There were no operational problems 
with the ADCP during the test cast. On 15 Feb 2013 at 12:10 GMT the first 
cast was done at deepest station in 4613 m of water. The three LADCP 
operators familiarized themselves with the setup and the typical deployment 
proceeded as follows:

• About 10 min prior to station arrival, the operator sets the station number 
  in the box in the upper right hand corner of the window. Starting with the 
  upward looking instrument, it is woken up by choosing 'Deployment 
  Initialization' from the dropdown menu. The time is recorded and the LADCP's 
  clock is checked against the ships GPS.
• The instrument voltage is checked and recorded by typing 'PT4'.
• Memory is erased by selecting 'Erase Memory Now' under the Command drop down 
  menu.
• If the LADCP clock is more than 2 seconds off of the ships GPS, the clock is 
  reset by selecting the option under the Deployment menu.
• The above steps are repeated for the downward looking instrument.
• The appropriate Command file is loaded for the instruments, starting with the 
  upward looking instrument by selecting 'Send Setup' under the Deployment tab. 
  The operator is careful to choose the file that has 'no_comments' in the name. 
  The output of this file is captured in a log file with the appropriate station 
  number.
• Time of the start of pinging is recorded, and the computer is disconnected 
  from the instruments by selecting 'Disconnect' from the drop down menu under 
  Deployment.
• Cables are disconnected, battery cap is replaced, dummy plugs are inserted.
• In situ time is recorded after deployment.

At the bottom of the cast the time, latitude, longitude, CTD maximum depth, 
and height off the bottom are recorded. When the rosette is secured on deck, 
the operator dries and connects the cables, removes the battery cap, and 
begins the recovery procedure:

• The operator sends a 'break' command to the upward looking instrument by 
  selecting 'Recovery Initialization' under the Recover tab, halting data 
  collection and closing the data file.
• Voltage is checked and recorded by typing PT4.
• The two steps above are repeated for the downward looking instrument.
• The battery charger is switched on. 
• Data is downloaded by selecting 'Download' from the Recover drop down menu. 
  The latest data file is selected (if there is more than one file) and 
  downloaded to a xxx.dat file, where xxx represents the station number. The 
  file size is also recorded. When download is complete, the instruments are 
  automatically powered down. 
• The new files are copied to the data processing computer via the ship's shared 
  network where the file is renamed to 'act0213_up_xxx.000' or 
  'act0213_dn_xxx.000'., where xxx represents the station number.

Four lines of CTD casts were completed during the cruise. They continued as 
follows:

                                                     Station      Date 
                                                   (Location)    (2013)     Time
                                                  —————————————  ———————  —————————
Synoptic Line                                     CTD 001 (P5)   15 Feb.  12:10 GMT
                                                  CTD 020 (P1)   18 Feb.  13:51 GMT
Mooring Operations                                CTD 021 (P1)   18 Feb.  23:45 GMT
(skipped CTD stations between mooring sites A-E)  CTD 033 (P5)   24 Feb.  09:00 GMT
Synoptic Line across Current only                 CTD 034 (P1)   25 Feb.  14:47 GMT
                                                  CTD 046 (F)    27 Feb.  08:01 GMT
Time Series                                       CTD 047 (B-C)  27 Feb.  09:43 GMT
                                                  CTD 057 (B-C)  28 Feb.  14:00 GMT


There were two casts where CTD malfunctions affected the LADCP. On 17 Feb., 
three attempts were made at CTD 010, resulting in two aborted casts and a 
final successful cast. The LADCP began pinging and was stopped on both failed 
casts; however, data was not collected. Before the third cast at this 
station, the SBE-9 was swapped out for a spare one and the third cast, 
010/03, was completed successfully. On 26 Feb., shortly after the beginning 
of cast 040, the CTD's pressure sensors malfunctioned, aborting the cast. 
Redeployment occurred just five minutes later, and there was no need to 
stop/restart the LADCP.

Unusual behavior of the LADCP occurred at the start of pinging on several of 
the early casts. On casts 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, and 12, the upward looking 
instrument would record an ensemble when it started pinging instead of 
waiting for a signal from downward looking ADCP. This resulted in an 'extra' 
ensemble in the data for the upward looking instrument that needed to be cut 
in order for the first-pass processing to begin. However, there was no 
consistency in the occurrence of this behavior, and later casts proceeded 
without any issues.

In the core of the current, the ADCP recorded high tilt levels due to high 
shear conditions. The rosette was strongly tilted up to 20 degrees during 
most of the time-series casts and casts 16, 17, 37, and 38. Normal cutoff 
limit in the processing software is 30 degrees. A 'bump' in the tilt often 
occurred immediately after the upcast began. During these high shear casts, 
bottom track velocities were also greatly offset from the profile.

There were large error velocities at the start of the upcast in most casts. 
This effect is likely due to the low scatter environment at depth coupled 
with the wake of the rising package. During Cast 13, the acceleration of the 
package before and after bottle stops was decreased to see if it would reduce 
the error, but there was no obvious improvement.

In shallow casts, the 150kHz workhorse did not produce reliable velocity 
measurements. Processing of the data from the 150kHz workhorse failed 
completely in cast 34. The downward looking ADCP seemed to have trouble 
distinguishing between reflection off the bottom and backscatter in the water 
column.


Data Processing:

The raw data files and logs were copied to the data processing computer and 
renamed. Navigation data were extracted from the half-second CTD time-series 
data. After the data were copied to the correct directories, 'first-pass' 
processing took place. Processing of the raw LADCP data used version 10.14 of 
the M. Visbeck & A. Thurnherr.

MATLAB toolbox. The toolbox was modified by G. Krahmann. The script copies, 
loads, and runs the shear and inverse methods, producing sixteen plots of 
useful diagnostics including a full depth velocity profile and maximum depth 
from the integrated vertical velocity. The processing scripts required some 
modification to ensure proper loading of GPS and ADCP data. Two small m-files 
were added: 'load_ctd_for nav.m' and 'load_ctd_for_prof.m'. Manual 
modifications to the scripts 'cruise_params.m' and 'prepare_cast.m' were also 
necessary prior to execution of each pass. The changes ensured that 
navigation data would be used, disabling bottom tracking during the first 
pass. When the first pass is complete, the operator makes note of the CTD 
maximum depth, the depth based on the integrated vertical velocity, and 
retains a hard copy for easy comparison.

Second-pass processing included both CTD time-series and pressure data. 
During the second pass, bottom tracking is turned on and the LADCP software 
becomes much more accurate at masking out the sea floor and determining 
bottom-track velocities. Once the first and second passes are complete, a 
third and final pass is done that incorporates the shipboard 75kHz ADCP data.

Summary:

Overall, the hybrid 150kHz/300kHz Workhorse LADCP performed well, without any 
major issues. After some initial confusion about the current draw of the 
American Reliance Inc. LPS- 305 programmable power supply, the charger was 
swapped out for the Soneil 4808SRF. The battery held up well over the 57 
total casts and did not require a large amount of recharge time. Processing 
of the shallow water casts proved to be difficult due to the errors in bottom 
detection from the 150kHz instrument. Most stations had high error velocity 
in the downward looking instrument on the upcast, possibly due to the low 
scatter environment at depth coupled with the wake of the package. Second 
pass processing shows a high offset of the bottom track velocities from the 
full velocity profile during casts in strong current. 


Figure 1: Across-track velocity profile for stations 1-20

Figure 2: Across-track velocity profile for stations 35-46




















                                               Int.  
                          In-    End            w
         Date     Start  situ    cast  Stop   depth   ctd max   depth 
Stn  (yyyy/mm/dd) time   time    time  time    (m)   depth (m)   (m)    Latitude    Longitude
———  ———————————  —————  —————  —————  —————  ————  ——————————  —————  ——————————  ——————————
test  2013/02/14  11:20  11:59  13:03  13:13   989   988 dbar   1500   -35 12.124   23 47.714
  1   2013/02/15  11:57  12:10  15:29  15:38  4617  4665        4613   -35 43.90    28 53.88
  2   2013/02/15  16:33  17:31  20:35  20:46  4533  4510        4475   -35 32.00    28 46.62
  3   2013/02/15  21:48  22:02  01:09  01:22  4376  4410        4365   -35 20.780   28 39.823
  4   2013/02/16  02:21  02:33  05:35  05:45  4402  4377        4387   -35 9.0201   28 32.614
  5   2013/02/16  06:41  06:56  09:59  10:09  4327  4375 dbar   4332   -34 57.377   28 25.5131
  6   2013/02/16  10:48  11:33  14:31  14:39  4380  4352 dbar   4380   -34 49.14    28 20.718
  7   2013/02/16  15:28  15:41  18:45  18:56  4181  4159        4156   -34 41.880   28 15.754
  8   2013/02/16  19:44  20:04  22:54  23:04  4022  4003        4003   -34 32.596   28 9.665
  9   2013/02/16  23:40  23:57  02:37  02:47  3842  3826        3830   -34 24.140   28 5.678
 10   2013/02/17  06:06  06:15  09:06  09:14  3717  3696        3700   -34 17.314   28 1.066
 11   2013/02/17  10:02  10:30  13:05  13:12  3622  3617        3646   -34 8.202    27 56.358
 12   2013/02/17  13:59  14:12  16:49  16:57  3560  3594        3600   -34 01.242   27 51.798
 13   2013/02/17  18:40  18:45  21:18  21:31  3079  3066        3070   -33 53.858   27 47.92
 14   2013/02/17  22:47  22:56  00:55  01:08  2223  2217        2462   -33 47.486   27 41.921
 15   2013/02/18  02:49  03:11  04:40  04:50  1700  1701        1764   -33 42.735   27 40.440
 16   2013/02/18  05:49  06:01  07:18  07:29  1227  1225        1305   -33 39.968   27 39.037
 17   2013/02/18  08:37  08:40  09:45  09:46   538   570         580   -33 35.742   27 37.500
 18   2013/02/18  10:35  10:57  11:30  11:29   298   303         340   -33 33.590   27 35.934
 19   2013/02/18  12:06    -    12:43  12:44    89    94          80   -33 27.798   27 32.922
 20   2013/02/18  13:22  13:34  13:51  13:58    54    61           6   -33 20.628   27 28.845
 21   2013/02/18  23:30  23:45  23:54  00:02    56    62          61   -33 20.510   27 29.202
 22   2013/02/19  00:30  00:55  01:02  01:10    88  87.6 dbar     95   -33 27.8642  27 32.911
 23   2013/02/19  01:28  01:41  02:02  02:15   301   318 dbar    326   -33 33.498   27 35.834
 24   2013/02/21  12:43    -    15:35  15:36  3724  3700        3700   -34 17.502   28 02.148
 25   2013/02/21  16:08  16:15  18:58  19:11  3850  3889        3822   -34 23.674   28 5.443
 26   2013/02/21  22:16  22:25  01:13  01:25  4030  4012        4010   -34 32.968   28 9.603
 27   2013/02/22  08:02    -    11:09  11:10  4179  4156        4250   -34 40.368   28 15.426
 28   2013/02/23  00:16  00:36  03:21  03:36  4302  4278        4275   -34 49.402   28 21.534
 29   2013/02/23  07:34    -    10:59  10:59  4361  4335        4374   -34 57.486   28 25.662
 30   2013/02/23  14:36  14:51  18:00  18:04  4418  4390        4414   -35 09.102   28 32.664
 31   2013/02/23  19:02  19:14  22:10  22:19  4392  4363        4365   -35 20.763   28 39.688
 32   2013/02/24  01:13  01:30  04:23  04:32  4537  4591        4475   -35 31.993   28 46.757
 33   2013/02/24  05:27  05:43  09:00  09:00  4643  4707        4617   -35 44.064   28 53.892
 34   2013/02/25  14:33  14:47  15:12  15:14    -     59          60   -33 20.864   27 28.992
 35   2013/02/25  15:56  16:04  16:27  16:37    96    96          96   -33 27.552   27 32.724
 36   2013/02/25  17:00  17:12  17:42  17:53   302   300         303   -33 33.40    27 35.84
 37   2013/02/25  18:11  18:22  19:07  19:17   531   528         600   -33 35.711   27 37.42
 38   2013/02/25  19:45  19:56  21:33  21:18  1155  1151        1263   -33 39.32    27 39.32
 39   2013/02/25  21:55  22:05  23:54  00:00  1715  1730        1765   -33 42.273   27 41.078
 40   2013/02/25  00:48  01:28  03:15  03:19  2245  2264        2354   -33 67.761   27 42.458
 41   2013/02/25  04:08  04:18  06:40  06:55  3169  3201        3068   -33 53.7631  27 47.8130
 42   2013/02/26  07:13  07:32  10:12  10:12  3595  3595        3578   -34 1.28     27 51.83
 43   2013/02/26  10:48  11:08  13:47  13:46  3628  3611        3619   -34 8.217    27 36.300
 44   2013/02/26  14:26  14:48  17:22  17:30  3717  3704        3707   -34 17.177   28 1.443
 45   2013/02/26  18:09  18:22  21:05  21:14  3845  3832        3828   -34 23.98    28 5.60
 46   2013/02/26  22:12  22:26  01:10  01:21  4013  4056 dbar   3997   -34 32.289   28 9.783
 47   2013/02/27  06:23  06:40  08:01  08:11  1741  1759 dbar   1764   -33 42.126   27 41.099
 48   2013/02/27  09:28  09:43  11:12  11:12  1712  1730        1764   -33 42.668   27 40.414
 49   2013/02/27  12:31  12:40  14:14  14:15  1677  1696    -          -33 42.160   27 41.209
 50   2013/02/27  15:44  16:09  17:31  17:39  1687  1689        1745   -33 41.998   27 41.148
 51   2013/02/27  18:27  18:35  20:01  20:10  1702  1722        1767   -33 42.132   27
 52   2013/02/27  21:29  21:38  23:03  23:10  1697  1697        1767   -33 42.13    27 41.23
 53   2013/02/28  00:25  00:41  02:01  02:11  1704  1726 dbar   1760   -33 42.2048  27 41.0930
 54   2013/02/28  03:22  03:40  05:13  05:24  1693  1708 dbar   1758   -33 42.156   27 41.0906
 55   2013/02/28  06:23  06:41  08:04  08:09  1731  1748        1776   -33 42.2735  27 41.1042
 56   2013/02/28  09:21  09:30  11:05  11:05  1683  1702        1768   -33 42.102   27 41.226
 57   2013/02/28  12:29  12:40  14:00  14:12  1698  1710        1722   -33 42.030   27 40.810




CPIES Telemetry and Recovery Report
Agulhas Current Time-series Cruise
February 2013



CPIES recovery and telemetry operations were conducted aboard the R/V Knorr 
during the third and final Agulhas Time-series cruise from February 21st 
through the 24th 2013.  All CPIES were found to be sampling prior to recovery; 
the 4-ping 12 kHz pulses could be clearly heard at each site.  All CPIES 
responded, without fail, to the various commands sent (clear, transpond, 
release, etc.)  The acoustic environment could not have been more favorable.


Telemetry Sessions

Before starting a telemetry session or recovery operations, we used the 
CPIES’ transpond mode to triangulate a more precise location of the 
instruments.  In all cases, the surveyed position was some distance away from 
the deployment location, due to the varying strength of the current.  
Telemetry was performed on two of the 5 CPIES: S/N 243 (site P5) and S/N 241 
(site P2).  S/N 241 telemetry was successful, with the full 34 month record 
transmitted in about 10 hours. S/N 243 telemetry also covered the entire 
deployment, but no 12 kHz pulses marking the year-day were heard, save for 
the last one marking the end of the record (year-day 376).  

Our deck box was a Benthos UDB9000 (S/N 48700, modem sw ver. 2.2.1 rev 6046, 
display sw ver. 2.2.1) plugged into the ship’s hull-mounted transducer 
amidships (model EDO 323-B) via an impedance matching box.  We used a receive 
threshold of 122, which seemed to work well, with very few stray signals 
detected.  No other changes to the deck box settings were necessary. Acoustic 
conditions were excellent for both telemetry sessions.  There was very little 
current or wind at both sites, which allowed the ship to sit on station using 
dynamic positioning for the duration of the telemetry period.   We used a 
Java-based IES Telemetry application written by Pedro Pena of NOAA’s AOML 
group.  This application, while still in development, successfully interfaced 
to the UDB9000, captured and decoded the PDT blocks, and stored all data 
collected.  The software creates a URI-compatible telemetry data file, which 
allowed us to run the CPlotPDT_r3.m script to visualize the incoming data.  
Upon completion of the telemetry session, the release command was sent, and 
the unit recovered.


Recovery Operations

The remaining 3 CPIES were surveyed in, and then sent their release command.  
The burn-wire releases appeared to take between 12 and 16 minutes to fully 
break the link.  The deeper CPIES appeared to take slightly longer to burn 
through than the shallower ones.  We were able to track the relative position 
of the CPIES once the release command was sent using the ship’s depth sounder 
in “pinger” mode to plot a trace of the beacon signal on the strip chart 
screen.  A change from a flat-line trace to a sloping one signaled that the 
CPIES had left the bottom and was moving towards the surface. The rubber 
stoppers glued to the inside of the sphere did not stick well to the glass 
surface, and nearly all of them were found to have fallen off at some point 
during the ascent and recovery.  Most of the CPIES were recovered at night, 
and despite the shifting of the electronics boards inside the sphere, the 
strobe light was clearly visible, and the radio beacon was detected.  Two 
CPIES, s/n 245 and s/n 243, suffered broken radio antennas due to the board 
shifting.  S/N 243 appeared to have a small oil leak at the top of sphere, 
near the pressure sensor.

Recoveries were done by grappling for the tag line above the flotation when 
the CPIES drifted along the starboard side of the ship.  The glass flotation 
sphere and Z-Pulse current meter were pulled in by hand.  The crew then 
hooked a line into the bail attached to the transducer end of the unit and 
used a crane to pick it up out of the water.  In one instance, S/N 247’s Z-
Pulse cable got caught when trying to hook into the bale.  The plug was 
disconnected and the locking sleeve popped off one end, however the connector 
pins did not appear to suffer any damage.

Once each CPIES was recovered, it was brought into the main lab to download 
the data.  Unfortunately, the communication cable supplied with the CPIES was 
inadvertently not shipped, so it was necessary to rig up a replacement.  From 
the manual, we determined the pinout of the CPIES’ RS-232 connector and 
connected our replacement cable accordingly.  Unfortunately, we were 
ultimately unable to successfully communicate with any of the CPIES.  S/N 247 
did not respond at all when power was cycled, and while the others displayed 
the splash screen, they did not respond to the spacebar command to interrupt 
the automatic redeployment cycle.  A copy of the output from one such 
instance is included in this report.  We did not have sufficient time or 
energy to do exhaustive troubleshooting, therefore we opted to disconnect the 
battery, and copy the contents of the memory card directly to a computer.  

All five units had complete records.  The system log file contains a final 
message that states that this mission was aborted due to low system battery, 
which occurred at the time we attempted to communicate after recovery.  In 
addition, S/N 247’s system log contains several messages the others do not, 
but we were unable to interpret their meaning.  At the moment we surmise that 
the batteries were too low to bring up the main menu at the prompt, but 
further testing is necessary.


Table 1: Summary of CPIES Recovery Period.  Some survey positions are not as 
         yet available, so the initial launch positions are used.  Water 
depths 
         are approximate and not corrected for average sound velocity.

                               Uncorr                Off 
                               Depth   Release       bottom  Surface  On board      Clock offset
Stn  Latitude       Longitude  (m)     date/time     time    time     time          (from GMT)
———  —————————————  —————————  ——————  ————————————  ——————  ———————  ————————————  ————————————
P2   -34 40.688     28 14.485  4163    22 Feb. 2013  22:31   23:14    23:30         -190 sec
     (from survey)                     22:18   
P3   -34 57.485     28 25.662  4327    23 Feb. 2013  12:12   13:00    13:20         -381 sec
     (launch pos.)                     12:00
P4   -35 20.79      28 39.47   4400    23 Feb. 2013  23:12   23:57    24 Feb. 2013  -75 sec
     (from survey)                     22:56                          00:10
P5   -35 43.99      28 53.865  4616    24 Feb. 2013  20:42   21:31    21:40         -140 sec
     (launch pos.)                     20:25
P6   -34 24.011     28 5.660   3824    21 Feb. 2013  20:29   21:09    21:22          N/A
     (launch pos.)                     20:17 







******************************************************************************* 
       Inverted Echo Sounder Model 6.2B - Version: Nov  4 2009 15:26:26  
Serial No.245  Optional Sensors Installed: pressure and ZPulse current sensors 
             Configured for Acoustic Transducer Model: ITC3431C 
          Persistor CF1 SN: 52729      BIOS: 2.28      PicoDOS: 2.28  
         University of Rhode Island - Graduate School of Oceanography  
******************************************************************************* 

  Current IES day, date and time is Sun Feb 24 00:16:50 2013 

  Adjusting transmitter power... wait 

   Warning!... power discharger not working! 

\DATA 

  RESET record written to system.log... 

  *ping 

  Press the <space> key within the next 10 seconds to enter the IES Main Menu, 
  otherwise data collection will start with previous operating parameters. 

  Checking System.... wait 

  System Battery = 21.99 Volts @ 45.10 mA 
  System battery O.K. 
  Release Battery = 22.24 Volts @ 26.34 mA 
  FAILURE: Release Battery below 10.0 Volts or current greater than 10 milliAmps 

            Mission Aborted! 

  MISSION ABORTED! --- Battery voltage too low! 
  Invalid year-day... check clock function 
  Day buffers appended to data files... 
  ABORT record written to system.log... 
  ATTENTION: 	Low battery detected! 
              RAM buffers written to flash card 
              Abort record written to system log 
              Data acquisition system STOPPED 
              Watchdog timer disabled 
              You must replace battery to restart! 


















Mooring   Depth  Instrument               In-situ       Out-situ      Clock 
   ID      (m)      S/N      Instr. Type  (UTC)         (UTC)         Drift     Comments/Problems
————————  —————  ——————————  ———————————  ————————————  ————————————  ————————  ——————————————————————————————
M407 (A)  
M407-01    300     13389     150 kHz      11 Nov. 2011  19 Feb. 2013  +546 sec  Data look OK, range steady at 
                             WHQM-ADCP    05:30         05:09                   300m

M408 (B)
M408-01    600     15927     75 kHz       11 Nov. 2011  19 Feb. 2013  +737 sec  Data look good,
                             WHLR-ADCP    10:55         06:52                   infrequent blow-downs, 520m 
                                                                                nominal range
M408-02   1000     6166      Nortek       18 Apr. 2010  6 Nov. 2011   +26 sec.  Lower SNR due to blanking 
                             Aquadopp     10:00         14:35                   distance bug, but beam 
                                                                                amplitudes adequate.  Data 
                                                                                look good.

M409 (C)
M409-01    600     15873     75 kHz       12 Nov. 2011  19 Feb. 2013  +342 sec  Data look good, infrequent 
                             WHLR-ADCP    05:41         10:19                   blow-downs, 520m nominal range
M409-02   1000      6172     Nortek       12 Nov. 2011  19 Feb. 2013  +47 sec   Lower SNR d ue to blanking
                             Aquadopp     06:19         12:47                   distance bug, but beam 
                                                                                amplitudes adequate.  
                                                                                Data look good.
M409-03   1500      6136     Nortek       12 Nov. 2011  19 Feb. 2013  +66 sec   Low beam 2&3 amplitude relative
                             Aquadopp     06:45         11:10                   to beam 1, lower SNR due to 
                                                                                blanking bug, but data seem OK
M409-04   2000      6155     Nortek       12 Nov. 2011  19 Feb. 2013  +44 sec   Some comms problems on 
                             Aquadopp     07:05         11:29                   recovery. Beam amps. Low due to 
                                                                                blanking bug.  Lower SNR, but 
                                                                                data seem OK

M410 (D) 
M410-01    600      3714     75 kHz       13 Nov. 2011  21 Feb. 2013  +355 sec  Data look good,  infrequent
                             WHLR-ADCP    05:24         09:45                   blow-downs, 520m nominal range
                             (on loan) 
M410-02   1000      6137     Nortek       13 Nov. 2011  21 Feb. 2013  +30 sec   Beam 2 & 3 amplitudes
                             Aquadopp     05:44         10:02                   significantly lower than beam 1.  
                                                                                Lower SNR due to blanking bug, 
                                                                                but data are OK
M410-03   1500      6143     Nortek       13 Nov. 2011  21 Feb. 2013  +45 sec   Low beam amplitudes & SNR, due
                             Aquadopp     06:02         10:18                   to blanking bug, but data are OK
M410-04   2000      6139     Nortek       13 Nov. 2011  21 Feb. 2013  +12 sec   Low beam amplitudes & SNR, due
                             Aquadopp     06:19         10:30                   to blanking bug, but data are OK
M410-05   2500      6157     Nortek       13 Nov. 2011  21 Feb. 2013  +39 sec   Low beam amplitudes & SNR, due
                             Aquadopp     06:37         10:43                   to blanking bug, data are noisy 
                                                                                but useable
M410-06   3000      6138     Nortek       13 Nov. 2011  21 Feb. 2013  +61 sec   Low beam amplitudes & SNR, due
                             Aquadopp     06:56         10:56                   to blanking bug, data are noisy 
                                                                                but useable

M411 (E)
M411-01    300      8988     150 kHz      14 Nov. 2011  21 Feb. 2013  +203      Data look good, three strong 
                             WHQM-ADCP    06:12   04:55                         blow-downs (+250m, +400m, +500m) 
                                                                                250m nominal range, significant 
                                                                                (around 100m) diurnal range loss
M411-02    500      6147     Nortek       14 Nov. 2011  21 Feb. 2013  +22 sec   Low beam amp.& SNR due to blank-
                             Aquadopp     06:30         05:10                   ing bug, data looksOK though.
M411-03    700      6154     Nortek       14 Nov. 2011  21 Feb. 2013  +36 sec   Instrument deployed at wrong
                             Aquadopp     06:42         05:20                   depth. Low beam amp.& SNR due to 
                                                                                blanking bug, data look OK 
                                                                                though.
M411-04   1000      6173     Nortek       14 Nov. 2011  21 Feb. 2013  +43 sec   Low beam amp.& SNR due to blank-
                             Aquadopp     06:55         05:31                   ing bug, data look OK though.
M411-05   1500      1136     Nortek       14 Nov. 2011  21 Feb. 2013  +108 sec  Low beam amplitudes, data very
                             Aquadopp     07:11         05:47                   noisy due to blanking bug.  Data
                                                                                are useable though. brief 
                                                                                periods of high (+20 deg) tilt 
                                                                                during mooring blow-downs



Mooring   Depth  Instrument               In-situ       Out-situ      Clock 
   ID      (m)      S/N      Instr. Type  (UTC)         (UTC)         Drift     Comments/Problems
————————  —————  ——————————  ———————————  ————————————  ————————————  ————————  ——————————————————————————————
M411-06   2500      1138     Nortek       14 Nov. 2011  21 Feb. 2013 +112 sec   Beam amplitudes very low or 
                             Aquadopp     07:43   06:13                         dead,data are just noise, 
                                                                                nothing useable.  Unclear 
                                                                                whether this is due to blanking 
                                                                                bug or instrument failure, but 
                                                                                is likely the latter.

M412(F)
M412-01    300      13392    150 kHz      16 Nov. 2011  22 Feb. 2013  +763 sec  Data split into 5 files with
                             WHQM-ADCP    06:26         05:40                   roughly 9 hour gaps in between, 
                                                                                otherwise OK.  Was the only 
                                                                                profiler that split files on 
                                                                                this deployment.  250m nominal 
                                                                                range with several 200-400m 
                                                                                blow-downs
M412-02    500       6133    Nortek       16 Nov. 2011  22 Feb. 2013  +9 sec    Low beam amplitudes due to blank
                             Aquadopp     06:40         05:48                   ing bug, but data look OK
M412-03   1000       6145    Nortek       16 Nov. 2011  22 Feb. 2013  +51 sec   Low beam amplitudes due to blank
                             Aquadopp     06:55         06:03                   ing bug, but data look OK
M412-04   1500       6124    Nortek       16 Nov. 2011  22 Feb. 2013  +55 sec   Low beam amplitudes due to blank
                             Aquadopp     07:10         06:20                   ing bug. Large vertical (error)
                                                                                velocity, but data are useable. 
M412-05   2000       6175    Nortek       16 Nov. 2011  22 Feb. 2013  +45 sec   Low beam amplitudes due to blank
                             Aquadopp     07:26         06:36                   ing bug.  Large vertical (error)  
                                                                                velocity, but data are useable.
M412-06   3000       6168    Nortek       16 Nov. 2011  22 Feb. 2013    N/A     Batteries dead on recovery.
                             Aquadopp     08:00         07:06                   Voltage dropped off in mid-Nov 
                                                                                2012 and cut out around mid-
                                                                                December.  Very low beam 
                                                                                amplitudes and high vertical 
                                                                                (error) velocity.  Data are 
                                                                                marginal but useable.

M413 (G)
M413-01    300      13413    150 kHz      18 Nov. 2011  23 Feb. 2013  +858 sec  Several large (200-400+ m)
                             WHQM-ADCP    05:05         05:38                   blow-downs, but data are OK.  
                                                                                250m nominal range.
M413-02    500       5995    Nortek       18 Nov. 2011  23 Feb. 2013  +35 sec   Lower beam amplitudes due to
                             Aquadopp     05:15         05:49                   blanking bug, but data look OK
M413-03   1000       6144    Nortek       18 Nov. 2011  23 Feb. 2013  +25 sec   High vertical (error) velocity
                             Aquadopp     05:30         06:02                   due to blanking bug.  Beam 1 
                                                                                amplitude significantly higher 
                                                                                than other two.  Data are 
                                                                                useable
M413-04   1500       6146    Nortek       18 Nov. 2011  23 Feb. 2013    N/A     Battery dead on recovery.
                             Aquadopp     05:44         06:16                   Instrument only worked for a 
                                                                                brief time (about 1 day) before 
                                                                                stopping. Unknown whether this 
                                                                                was battery failure or 
                                                                                instrument failure.
M413-05   2000       6127    Nortek       18 Nov. 2011  23 Feb. 2013  +18 sec   Low beam amplitudes due to
                             Aquadopp     06:00         06:29                   blanking bug.  High vertical 
                                                                                (error) velocity.  Data are 
                                                                                useable though.
M413-06   3000       6152    Nortek       18 Nov. 2011  23 Feb. 2013  +18 sec   Large vertical (error)
                             Aquadopp     06:33         07:05                   velocity and very log beam 
                                                                                amplitudes due to blanking bug.  
                                                                                Data are useable.  Vertical 
                                                                                velocity is -20 to -40 cm/s







CCHDO Data Processing Notes

• various errors noted Bob Key 
Date: 2014-04-15 
Data Type: BTL/CTD 
Action: Update needed 
Note: 
I just finished import and found a few minor things you'll want to fix at 
some point. If it would help, I can provide an updated bottle file once I 
know the answer to BOTTLE#3 below.

BOTTLE:
1. The Day, Month and Year are all wrong. These can be taken from the CTD 
files with no problem
2. in the header names replace 2 occurrences of  "REFTEMP" with "REFTMP"
3. I don't know what "SALTREF" (and flag) is. Is it the same as "SBE35"??
4. The CTDOXY values have not been added to the bottle file. This would be a 
good test case for our discussion next week regarding update of ctd values in 
bottle files
5. The bottle oxygen are labeled as umol/kg, but that can't be correct. The 
values also cannot be ml/liter, so I don't know what they are. May have to 
pose that one to the ChSci.
bob

CTD:
1. There are a number of values >600 for CTDOXY. I set all these to NA
2. Station 10 has values that are highly unlikely for CTDOXY. I set all flag 
values for station 10 ctdoxy to 3
3. The ctdoxy values for station 998 are strange, but this seems to be a test 
station, so I did nothing
4. The ctdsal data appear to be very nicely calibrated to the bottle values
					

• Re-zipped act2013.tar.gz Matt Shen 
Date: 2014-04-15 
Data Type: BTL/CTD/CrsRpt 
Action: Website Update 
Note: 
unzipped and re-gzipped act2013.tar.gz to correct trailing garbage. 
File contains CTD & BTL data plus prelim. cruise report.
					

• File Submission Frank Delahoyde
act2013.tar.gz (download) #dd542 
Date: 2014-04-11 
Current Status: unprocessed 
Notes
BTL and CTD data  (WHP-Exchange / F. Delahoyde) in addition to preliminary 
cruise Documentation from ODF in PDF.


• Available under 'Files as received' CCHDO Staff 
Date: 2014-04-11 
Data Type: BTL/CTD/CrsRpt 
Action: Website Update 
Note: 
The following files are now available online under 'Files as received', 
unprocessed by the CCHDO.

act2013.tar.gz (contains BTL / CTD data and prelim. cruise report)