A. CRUISE NARRATIVE: A10, AR04EW, AR15 A.1. HIGHLIGHTS WHP CRUISE SUMMARY INFORMATION WOCE section A10 |AR15 |AR15 |AR04EW Expedition (EXPOCODE) 06MT22_5 |06MT22_4 |06MT22_3 |06MT22_2 Chief Scientists Onken/IfMK |Zenk/IfMK |Müller/IfMK |Rhein/IfMK Dates 1992.12.27 |1992.12.02 |1992.11.18 |92.10.23 - 1993.01.31|- 1992.12.22|- 1992.11.30|- 1992.11.15 ------------|------------|------------|------------ Number of CTD stations 113 |0 |0 |65 Ship R/V METEOR Ports of call Leg 5 Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) to Cape Town, Africa Leg 4 Santos (Brazil) to Rio de Janeiro Leg 3 Recife (Brazil) to Santos Leg 2 Recife (Brazi)l to Recife --------------------------------------------------- Station boundaries A10 - Leg 5 | AR15 - Leg 3 | 23°38.10'S | 13°57.4'S 47°29.90'W 15°0.12'E | 47°30.02'W 36°16.6'W 30°2.30'S | 28°50.15'S --------------------------|------------------------- AR15 - Leg 4 | AR04 - Leg 2 | 26°53.20' S | 6°39.26'N 26°59.39'W 44°27.47'W | 44°23.1'W 29°59.05'W 34°36.33'S | 10°0.06'S --------------------------|------------------------- Floats & drifters deployed AR15 - Legs 3 - 4 | A10 - Leg 5 22 RAFOS Floats | 1 RAFOS Float 3 MAFOS Monitors | 6 ARGOS Drifters 1 ARGOS Drifter | --------------------------------------------------- Moorings deployed/recovered Legs 3 - 4 4 Sound Source Moorings Deployed 6 Current Meter Moorings Deployed 11 Current Meter Moorings Recovered CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS W. Balzer U. Beckmann M. Bleckwehl J. Brinkmann K. Bulsiewicz H. Buschhoff C. Duncombe Rae M. Elbrächter W. Erasmi G. Fischer J. Fischer G. Fraas I. Girod L.I. Gordon J. Holfort J.C. Jennings H. Johannsen K. Johnson M. Kalberer U. Karbach A. Korves U. Koy G. Krahmann M. Krämer G. Kroll U. Kuller S. Matthias-Maser C. Meinke P. Meyer R. Millard L. Mintrop Th. Mitzka A. Morak J. Morlang T.J. Müller W.-T. Ochsenhirt R. Onken F.G. Palma U. Papenburg A. Putzka V. Ratmeyer J. Reppin M. Rhein E. Röd U. Rosiak D. Schneider B. Schneider U. Send L. Stramma R. Tiesel J. Waniek A. Welter J. Weyland N. Zangenberg C. Zelck W. Zenk A. Zimmermann TABLE OF CONTENTS Cruise tracks (see pdf) Abstract 1 Research Objectives 2 Participants 3 Research Programme 3.1 Marine Geology and Marine Chemistry M 22/1 3.1.1 Particle Flux Studies 3.1.2 Trace Element Cycling 3.2 Physical Oceanography M 22/2 3.3 Physical Oceanography M 22/3-4 3.4 Physical Oceanography M 22/5 3.5 Marine Chemistry M 22/5 3.6 Biological Oceanography and Marine Taxonomy M 22/5 3.7 Tracer Studies M 22/5 3.8 Atmospheric Physics M 22/5 4 Narrative of the Cruise 4.1 Leg M 22/1 (W.Balzer) 4.2 Leg M 22/2 (M. Rhein) 4.3 Leg M 22/3 (T.J. Müller) 4.4 Leg M 22/4 (W. Zenk) 4.5 Leg M 22/5 (R. Onken) 5 Preliminary Results 5.1 Marine Geology and Marine Chemistry during M 22/1 5.1.1 Deployments and Sampling (U. Rosiak, M. Kalberer, V. Ratmeyer, U. Kuller, M. Bleckwehl, G. Fischer, A. Zimmermann, H. Buschhoff, W. Balzer) 5.1.2 Particle Flux and Sediment Traps (G. Fischer, M. Kalberer, V. Ratmeyer, U. Rosiak, U. Kuller, M. Bleckwehl) 5.1.3 In situ Particle Camera Systems (V. Ratmeyer, U. Rosiak) 5.1.4 CTD-O2 Transparency Probe (G. Fischer, V. Ratmeyer) 5.1.5 Plankton Sampling Using the Multinet (M. Kalberer, U. Kuller, V. Ratmeyer, G. Fischer) 5.1.6 Continuous Chlorophyll a Measurements (M. Kalberer, V. Ratmeyer, G. Fischer) 5.1.7 In situ Filtration of Suspended Particles (W. Balzer, H. Buschhoff, F. G. Palma, D. Schneider, A. Zimmermann) 5.1.8 Water Sampling (W. Balzer, H. Buschhoff, F. G. Palma, D. Schneider, A. Zimmermann) 5.1.9 Sediment Sampling with the Multicorer (U. Rosiak, G. Fischer, M. Kalberer, V. Ratmeyer, D. Schneider, F. G. Palma) 5.2 Physical Oceanography M 22/2 5.2.1 CTD Measurement and Oxygen Calibration (L. Stramma, J. Waniek) 5.2.2 Freon Analysis F11, F12 (M. Rhein, M. Elbrächter) 5.2.3 lADCP (J. Fischer, C. Meinke) 5.2.4 Mooring Deployments (J. Fischer, U. Papenburg) 5.2.5 XBT Programme (L. Stramma, G. Kroll) 5.2.6 Pegasus Profiling System (U. Send, G. Krahmann) 5.2.7 Vessel-mounted ADCP (J. Reppin) 5.2.8 DVS (J. Reppin, Th. Mitzka) 5.3 Physical Oceanography M 22/3-4 (W. Zenk, T.J. Müller) 5.4 Marine Physics M 22/5 (U. Beckmann, C. Duncombe Rae, W. Erasmi, I. Girod, J. Holfort, U. Koy, P. Meyer, R. Onken, A. Welter, N. Zangenberg) 5.5 Marine Chemistry (H. Johannsen, K. Johnson, U. Karbach, A. Korves, L. Mintrop, A. Morak, J. Morlang, B. Schneider) 5.5.1 The Partial Pressure of CO2 (pCO2) 5.5.2 Total Carbon Dioxide (TCO2) 5.5.3 Alkalinity 5.5.4 Nutrients and Oxygen 5.6 Biological Oceanogaphy and Marine Taxonomy (C. Zelck) 5.7 Tracer Oceanography (K. Bulsiewicz, G. Fraas, A. Putzka, J. Weyland) 5.8 Atmospheric Physics (J. Brinkmann, M. Krämer, S. Matthias-Maser) 5.8.1 Size Distribution of Marine-borne Aerosol Particles - Spectral Recording of the Biological and the Water Soluble Fraction, Total Amount of Particulate Carbon 5.8.1.1 Size Distribution and Water Soluble Fraction of Atmospheric Aerosol Particles 5.8.1.2 The Biological Fraction of the Atmosphere Aerosol Particles 5.8.1.3 Total Amount of Particulate Carbon 5.8.2 Precipitation Analysis 6 Ship's Meteorological Station 6.1 M 22/1 (R. Tiesel, W.-T. Ochsenhirt) 6.2 M 22/2 (R. Tiesel) 6.3 M 22/3-5 (E. Röd) 7 Lists 7.1 Leg M 22/1 7.1.1 List of Stations 7.1.2 List of Moored Sediment Traps 7.1.3 Chlorophyll a Samples 7.1.4 Particle Filtration 7.2 Leg M 22/2 7.2.1 List of Stations 7.2.2 List of XBT Drops 7.3 Leg M 22/3-4 7.3.1 CTD Stations 7.3.2 List of the XBT Drops 7.3.3 Mooring Activities 7.3.3.1 Sound Source Moorings 7.3.3.2 Current Meter Moorings 7.3.4 RAFOS Floats and MAFOS Activities 7.3.4.1 RAFOS Floats 7.3.4.2 MAFOS Monitors 7.3.5 Drifter Activities 7.3.6 List of XCP Launches 7.4 Leg M 22/5 7.4.1 List of CTD Stations 7.4.2 List of XBT Drops 7.4.3 List of XCP Launches 7.4.4 RAFOS Floats 7.4.5 Drifter Activities 7.4.6 List of lADCP Profiles 8 Concluding Remarks 9 References 10 Figures CFC/Helium Report (W. Roether) CFC Report (M. Rhein) CTD DQE DQE of CTD Data (R. Millard) DQE of Nutrient/Salintiy/Oxygen Data (J.C. Jennings, L. I. Gordon) WHPO-SIO Data Processing Notes ABSTRACT From 22 September 1992 to 31 January 1993 the German Research Vessel METEOR performed its 22nd cruise, a journey in the Atlantic Ocean divided into five legs. The main objectives were geological and chemical observations in subtropical regions of the North Atlantic and in the tropical South Atlantic and in the tropical South Atlantic. Additional physical investigations were concentrated in the equatorial regions and at subtropical latitudes of the South Atlantic. These activities were coordinated internationally as part of the World Ocean Circulation Experiment (WOCE). They were supplemented by biological and air chemistry observations and by a component of Joint Global Ocean Flux Study (JGOFS). 1 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES The investigations during METEOR cruise no. 22 (Fig. 1a-c, Tab. 1) were aimed for geological and chemical studies in the subtropical North Atlantic and the tropical Atlantic (leg 1) at physical studies of large-scale oceanic transports in the equatorial Atlantic (leg 2) and the subtropical South Atlantic (legs 3, 4, and 5). The circulation measurements are part of the "World Ocean Circulation Experiment" (WOCE). In addition, biological and aerosol observations were carried out. The main goal of the activities during leg 1 of the Meteor cruise M22 was to improve the understanding of the environmental controls over particle sedimentation in the ocean. This sedimentation is an important component of the global carbon cycle. Several deep-sea moorings with sediment traps for particle sampling that have been deployed earlier had to be retrieved and relaunched during the cruise near the Canary Islands, south of the Cabo Verde Islands, and in the tropical east and west Atlantic. For studies of trace element cycling, suspended particulate matter, sediments and water samples where taken in addition to particles collected by moored sediment traps. During M 22/2, the circulation and water mass exchange in the tropical western Atlantic was studied. The programme is part of the German distribution to the international WOCE programme. The western boundary current is an important part of the thermohaline circulation, not only for inter-hemispheric water mass transfer, but also for the meridional heat transport. In order to determine the mean transports of the carious water masses and their variability, three current meter moorings were deployed in the boundary current at 44°W. Ship-based direct velocity measurements were carried out with two acoustic systems, the ADCP (lowered with the CTD and vessel-mounted) and the Pegasus profiling system. The CTD measurements were complemented by oxygen and freon measurements to determine the water mass boundaries and the spreading pattern of the various water masses and their variability. Additionally XBT's were dropped to improve spatial resolution. In the South Atlantic, the heat and water mass transports are dominated by the anticyclonic subtropical gyre near the surface. At lower levels the (Sub) Antarctic Intermediate Water and the Circumpolar Deep Water have northward components, and the North Atlantic Deep Water has southward components. At the lowest level the Antarctic Bottom Water passes the South Atlantic on its way from the Antarctic to the North Atlantic. Investigations of the water mass transports in the western South Atlantic were performed during legs 3 and 4. These included studies of the near-surface southward Brazil Current, the Antarctic Intermediate Water on its way north, the deep western boundary current at the continental slope and the overflow of Antarctic Bottom Water across the Rio Grande Rise through the Vema and Hunter Channels. Thirteen deep-sea current meter moorings had been deployed by METEOR in January 1991 between the continental slope and the Vema Channel. Eleven of these moorings were recovered. CTD measurements were also carried out at the moorings' positions for a determination of the water mass contribution, and in the area of the eastern Rio Grande Rise. Seven deep-sea moorings were deployed in the Hunter Channel overflow region. In addition, satellite-tracked ARGOS drifters were launched for near-surface current observations, and RAFOS floats with acoustic tracking for current measurements in the Antarctic Intermediate Water. Four sound sources were deployed in the area. These studies are part of the "WOCE Deep Basin Experiment" (DBE). The global "WOCE Hydrographic Programme" (WHP) includes a large set of zonal and meridional sections in all oceans, with measurements of temperature, salinity, oxygen, nutrients and anthropogenic tracers. The aim is the determination of global water mass distributions and geostrophic mass and heat transports. The zonal WHP section A10 along 30°S was selected for leg M 22/5. Station distances were in the range of 9 to 45 nautical miles on a cruise track from Brazil to southern Africa. The investigations were supplemented by measurements of the carbonate system as a contribution to the "Joint Global Ocean Flux Study" (JGOFS), by biological sampling for the determination of surface plankton, and by studies of atmospheric aerosol particles. Here, particularly the biological constituents, the size distributions and the soluble components of aerosol were determined. In addition the carbon content and the properties of precipitation water found in these extremely clean oceanic regions will be compared to results from urban areas. TAB. 1: Legs and chief scientists of METEOR cruise no. 22 Leg 22/1 22.09.92 - 21.10.92 Hamburg - Recife/Brazil Chief scientist: Prof. Dr. W. Balzer Leg 22/2 23.10.92 - 15.11.92 Recife - Recife Chief scientist: Dr. M. Rhein Leg 22/3 18.11.92 - 30.11.92 Recife - Santos/Brazil Chief scientist: Dr. T.J. Müller Leg 22/4 01.12.92 - 22.12.92 Santos - Rio de Janeiro/Brazil Chief scientist: Dr. W. Zenk Leg 22/5 27.12.92 - 31.01.93 Rio de Janeiro - Cape Town/South Africa Chief scientist: Dr. R. Onken Coordination: Prof. Dr. G. Siedler Masters (F.S. METEOR): Legs 22/1-4 Captain G. Müller Leg 22/5 Captain M. Kull 2 PARTICIPANTS TAB. 2: Participants of METEOR cruise no. 22 LEG M 22/1 Name Specialty Institute Balzer, Wolfgang, Prof. Dr. (Chief Scientist) Marine Chemistry UBB Bleckwehl, Manfred, Dipl.-Ing. Geology UBG Buschhoff, Hella, Techn. Ass. Marine Chemistry UBB Fischer, Gerhard, Dr. Geology UBG Gonzales Palma, Francisco, Stud. Marine Chemistry UGC Kalberer, Markus, Stud. Environ. Sciences ETHZ Kuller, Uwe, Stud. Geology UBG Ochsenhirt, Wolf-Thilo, Techn. Meteorology DWD Rathmeyer, Volker, Dipl.-Geol. Geology UBG Rosiak, Uwe, Techn. Ass. Geology UBG Schneider, Daniel, Stud. Marine Chemistry UGC Tiesel, Reiner, Dr. Meteorology DWD Zimmermann, Andreas, Stud. Marine Chemistry UBB LEG M 22/2 Name Specialty Institute Rhein, Monika, Dr. (Chief Scientist) Marine Physics IfMK Baum, Ekkehard, Dipl.-Phys. Marine Physics IfMK Beckmann, Uwe, Techn. Marine Physics IfMK Eisele, Alfred, Techn. Marine Physics IfMK Elbrächter, Martina, Techn. Marine Physics IfMK Fischer, Jürgen, Dr. Marine Physics IfMK Krahmann, Gerd, Dipl.-Phys. Marine Physics IfMK Kroll, Gerhard, Dr. Marine Physics IfMK Langhof, Hans-Jürgen, Techn. Marine Physics IfMK Meinke, Claus, Dipl.-Ing. Marine Physics IfMK Mitzka, Thomas, Stud. Marine Physics IfMK Ochsenhirt, W.-Th., Techn. Meteorology DWD Papenburg, Uwe, Techn. Marine Physics IfMK Ramos, José, Capitao-Tenente Observer DHN Reppin, Jörg, Dipl.-Oz. Marine Physics IfMK Send, Uwe, Dr. Marine Physics IfMK Stramma, Lothar, Dr. Marine Physics IfMK Tiesel, Rainer, Dr. Meteorology DWD Tinnemeyer, Stephan, Stud. Marine Physics IfMK Treede, Holger, Techn. Marine Physics IfMK Waniek, Joanna, Dipl.-Oz. Marine Physics IfMK LEG M 22/3 Name Specialty Institute Siedler, Gerold, Prof. (Chief Scientist, Nov. 16-18) Marine Physics IfMK Müller, Thomas, Dr. (Chief Scientist, Nov. 18-30) Marine Physics IfMK Bassek, Dieter, Techn. Meteorology DWD Biastoch, Arne, Stud. Marine Physics IfMK Boebel, Olaf, Dr. Marine Physics IfMK Carlsen, Dieter, Techn. Marine Physics IfMK Haag, Christian, Stud. Marine Physics IfMK Johannsen, Werner, Techn. Marine Physics IfMK Kipping, Antonius, Techn. Marine Physics IfMK Kisjeloff, Boris, Techn. Computer Science IfMK Ramos, José, Capitao-Tenente Observer DHN Röd, Erhard, Dr. Meteorology DWD Wehrend, Dirk, Techn. Marine Physics IfMK Schmid, Claudia, Dipl.-Oz. Marine Physics IfMK LEG M 22/4 Name Specialty Institute Zenk, Walter, Dr. (Chief Scientist) Marine Physics IfMK Bassek, Dieter, Techn. Meteorology DWD Biastoch, Arne, Stud. Marine Physics IfMK Boebel, Olaf, Dr. Marine Physics IfMK Bradshaw, Kenton M., Techn. Marine Physics WHOI Carlsen, Dieter, Techn. Marine Physics IfMK Correia, Ivo F., Scientist Marine Geology GEOMAP Diaz Pinaya, Walter H., Stud. Marine Physics IOUSP Gallo Xavier, Andrea, Techn. Data Bank Petrobras Haag, Christian, Stud. Marine Physics IfMK Hogg, Nelson, Dr. Marine Physics WHOI Johannsen, Werner, Techn. Marine Physics IfMK Kipping, Antonius, Techn. Marine Physics IfMK Kisjeloff, Boris, Techn. Computer Science IfMK Moreira Lima, José, Scientist Marine Physics Peterobras Ramos, José, Capitao-Tenente Observer DHN Röd, Erhard, Dr. Meteorology DWD Wehrend, Dirk, Techn. Marine Physics IfMK Worrilow, Scott, Ing. Marine Physics WHOI Schmid, Claudia, Dipl.-Oz. Marine Physics IfMK Zhang, Huai, Scientist Marine Physics WHOI LEG M 22/5 Name Specialty Institute Onken, Reiner, Dr. (Chief Scientist) Marine Physics IfMK Bassek, Dieter, Techn. Meteorology DWD Beckmann, Uwe, Techn. Marine Physics IfMK Brinkmann, Jutta, Dipl.-Met. Atmospheric Physics UMZ Bulsiewicz, Klaus, Dipl.-Phys. Tracer Oceanography UBT Duncombe Rae, Chris, M.Sc. Phys. Oceanography SFRI Erasmi, Wolfgang, Stud. Marine Physics IfMK Fraas, Gerd, Techn. Tracer Oceanography UBT Girod, Ilona, Stud. Marine Physics IfMK Holford, Jürgen, Dipl.-Oz. Marine Physics IfMK Johannsen, Hergen, Techn. Marine Chemistry IfMK Johnson, Kenneth, Dr. Marine Chemistry BNL Karbach, Uwe, Techn. Marine Chemistry IfMK Korves, Annette, Techn. Marine Chemistry IfMK Koy, Uwe, Techn. Marine Physics IfMK Krämer, Martina, Dr. Atmospheric Physics UMZ Matthias-Maser, Sabine, Dr. Atmospheric Physics UMZ Meyer, Peter, Dipl.-Ing. Marine Physics IfMK Mintrop, Ludger, Dr. Marine Chemistry IfMK Morak, Anja, Techn. Marine Chemistry IfMK Morlang, Jürgen, Stud. Marine Chemistry IfMK Putzka, Alfred, Dr. Tracer Oceanography UBT Ramos, José, Capitao-Tenente Observer DHN Röd, Erhard, Dr. Meteorology DWD Schneider, Bernd, Dr. Tracer Oceanography UBT Welter, Alexander, Stud. Marine Physics IfMK Weyland, Joachim, Stud. Tracer Oceanography UBT Zangenberg, Norbert, Dipl.-Oz. Marine Physics IfMK Zelck, Clementine, Dipl.-Biol. Marine Biology BAH TAB. 3: Participating Institutions BAH Bundesforschungsanstalt Helgoland c/o Zoologisches Institut und Museum Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3 20146 Hamburg Germany BNL Oceanographic and Atmospheric Sciences Division, Bldg. 318 Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY 11973 USA DHN Diretoria Hidrografia e Navegacao Niteroi, RJ Brazil DWD Deutscher Wetterdienst, Seewetteramt Bernhard-Nocht-Str. 76 20359 Hamburg Germany ETHZ Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Dept. Umweltnaturwissenschaften Zürich Switzerland GEOMAP GEOMAP Rua Mexico, 21-150 Rio de Janeiro - RJ Brazil IfMK Institut für Merreskunde an der Universität Kiel Düsternbrooker Weg 20 24105 Kiel Germany IOUSP Universidade de Sao Paulo Instituto Oceanográfico Cidade Universitária CEP 055 08 P.O. Box 9075 Sao Paulo Brazil Petrobras Petrobras/ CENPES (Research and Development Center) Cidade Universitária Q7 Ilha do Fundao 21910 Rio de Janeiro - RJ Brazil SFRI Sea Fisheries Research Institute Private Bag X2 Rogge Bay 8012 Cape Town Republic of South Africa UBB Fachbereich 2, Meereschemie Universität Bremen P.O. Box 330440 28334 Bremen Germany UBG Fachbereich Geowissenschaften Universität Bremen P.O. Box 330440 28334 Bremen Germany UGC Facultad de Ciencias del Mar Universitad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria Campus universitario de Tafira 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria Spain UMZ Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre Johannes-gutenberg-Universität Saarstr. 21 55122 Mainz Germnay WHOI Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA 3 RESEARCH PROGRAMME 3.1 MARINE GEOLOGY AND MARINE CHEMISTRY, LEG M22/1 For the long-term research project of the SFB 261 aimed at reconstructing the mass budget and current systems of the South Atlantic during the late Quaternary, sample material needs to be taken from the water column, from sinking particles and from the sea floor. The sediment traps deployed during METEOR-Cruise 20 had to be recovered and partly re-deployed; in addition, new trap moorings had to be launched south of Cabo Verde and in the equatorial West Atlantic. Micropaleontological, geochemical and isotopic characteristics of the trap material and of the sediments will be determined both on board and in laboratories at home subsequent to the cruise. 3.1.1 PARTICLE FLUX STUDIES It was intended to determine the seasonal pattern of particle sedimentation in representative productivity regions of the Eastern and Equatorial Atlantic. For this purpose, sediment traps with time controlled sample changers were deployed at critical stations during cruise M 20 for a period of one year; these traps had to be recovered and redeployed during cruise M 22. New moorings with sediment traps had to be deployed south of Cabo Verde Islands in a highly productive divergence zone and in the equatorial West Atlantic. The moorings in the West Atlantic are part of a SW-NE transect over the equatorial upwelling system. The transect will be completed by an additional mooring to be deployed during M23/3. The following properties of the trapped material will be investigated: the species composition of the planktonic organisms (pteropods, foraminifera, radiolaria, coccolithophorids, and diatoms), the chemical and isotopic composition of these organisms, as well as the composition of the organic and terrigenous material. The objective of the study is to identify seasonal variations in those components, which play an important role in the sediment formation process. The results are expected to provide a basis for deducing paleo-current systems and paleoproduction conditions from sediment analyses. The primary aim was to characterize the particle flux in the important production zones and to determine the portion of sinking material (export production) in relation to the productivity of the region. In particular, the idea is to be tested that a smaller portion of material sinks out of less productive regions in comparison to productive regions. In addition, it is important to consider the ratio of carbon in organic form (C(org)) to carbon in carbonates (C(carb)) and its variation from one area to the other. This ratio is important for the carbon cycle since the formation of carbonate releases CO2, while the production of organic matter binds it. A potential correlation between the sedimentation of opal and the productivity of a region will also be investigated. 3.1.2 TRACE ELEMENT CYCLING The Marine Chemistry Group at the University of Bremen investigates the vertical transport of trace elements from the mixed layer until their burial in the sediments by participating in the sediment trap program of the Dept. of Geosciences at the University of Bremen. Several productivity regions typical for the Eastern and Equatorial Atlantic are studied within the framework of the German JGOFS program. In the material from the moored sediment traps (consisting mostly of fast sinking particles) a set of selected trace elements (Al, As, Ba, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, Se, V, Zn) will be analyzed in home laboratories. During M22/1 samples of suspended material (comprising slowly sinking particles) were obtained on the same stations by using in situ-pumps supplemented by water sampling using GoFlo-bottles. Comparison of both kinds of water column particles with the trace element composition of the sediment, and its relation to the vertical distribution of dissolved trace elements in the water column are expected to provide important clues on transport and sorption mechanisms as well as on the general geochemical behaviour of these elements in the ocean. For a study of trace element speciation and the their mode of dissolution from dust, suspended particles from the regions of maximal dust input and of maximal precipitation (ITCZ) off Northwest Africa were sampled. 3.2 PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY M 22/2 The western tropical Atlantic is a region of special interest in the global circulation. The meridional heat transport takes place by warm surface water and subpolar intermediate water from the Southern Hemisphere moving northward in the upper 800m, and North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW) moving southward between 1200 and 4000 m. In total, the transport of this meridional cell at the equator is estimated at 15 x 10^(6)m^(3)s^(-1) or even higher. The details of the mean water mass exchange across the equator are not well known from observations. Furthermore, the seasonal changes of the upper-layer circulation in this region are insufficiently explored. The objective during leg M 22/2 was to investigate the transport and the spreading of water masses in the western equatorial Atlantic with regard to their means as well as their annual and longer-term variations. For comparison the results of the fall situation 1990 from cruise M 14/2 and the spring situation 1991 from cruise M 16/3 are available. Currents were investigated using current meter moorings as well as shipborne acoustic measurement techniques on different time and space scales. Three moorings were deployed along 44°W off the Brazilian coast (K359 - K361). All three moorings are equipped with upward- looking acoustic Doppler current profilers (ADCPs) for measuring the currents in the upper 300m of the water column. From the moorings, results are expected on the mean currents and on transports in the boundary regime and their variability. The instantaneous current field was measured by two shipborne acoustic measurement techniques. One method used the shipborned ADCP which recorded the currents within the upper 300 m of the water column. The second acoustic method used the Pegasus system. It included a free- falling acoustic instrument that measures the acoustic travel time relative to bottom transponders, which were deployed and distances were measured prior to profiling. Near the ocean bottom the Pegasus dropped an attached weight and returned to the ocean surface. From the recorded acoustic travel time data relative to the bottom transponders a current profile was derived on board of the sip. Because of the complicated vertical structure of the currents near the equator and the non-applicability of the geostrophic method, the Pegasus system is the most suitable instrument to measure current profiles and transport below the depth reached by the vessel-mounted ADCP. Pegasus drops were carried out at 44°W, at 35°W, and at 5°S (see Fig. 1d). Another profiling system used a self-contained ADCP attached to the rosette. This method was explored and found to work well on previous cruises. The distributions of salinity, oxygen, freon and temperature characterize the water masses in the equatorial boundary current region. Measurements at 60 stations were carried out suing the CTD with oxygen sensor and rosette sampler. From the rosette, water samples were taken to determine freon concentrations and to calibrate the salinity and oxygen measurements. Resolution along the sections was improved by XBT drops between the hydrographic stations. The results of M 22/2 will be compared to the previous measurements of cruises M 14/2 and M 16/3 and further evaluated in cooperation with other groups. 3.3 PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY M 22/3-4 The planned work of the Marine Physics group was related to two topics (see Figs. 4 and 5). First, we have investigated the Brazil Current and its hydrographic environment at the shelf edge of Brazil. Second, we studied the deep western boundary currents and the water exchange of Intermediate and Bottom Waters between the Argentine and the Brazil basins. The main objectives of both subprogrammes concerned water transport rates in the southwest of the large-scale subtropical circulation in the South Atlantic. Both programme topics were directly related to the work that was preformed on board METEOR during cruise no. 15. In January 1991 a total of 13 deep-sea moorings was launched between the Brazilian shelf and the Vema Channel. These moorings had to be recovered during cruise no. 22. Both studies represent significant components of the international WOCE programme with its subprogramme Deep Basin Experiment (DBE). The field work was carried out in cooperation with researchers of the University of Sao Paulo, Brazil, and the Woods Hole oceanographic Institution, USA. Surveys of the 200-300 m deep Brazil Current were conducted using acoustic (ADCP) and electromagnetic (XCP) methods. Near-surface currents have been determined by satellite tracked drifters. All current observations were supplemented by CTD and XBT casts. Beneath the southward Brazil Current flows the Antarctic Intermediate Water with a northward component at 900m depth. Neutrally buoyant RAFOS floats have been used to track the movement of these waters. The deep western boundary current system additionally was observed by CTD profiling. After the recovery of the earlier launched current meters in the Vema Channel METEOR proceeded towards the Hunter Channel for the deployment of six current meter moorings. The instruments will monitor the water exchange between the two ocean basins. These observations were supplemented by hydrographic surveys. In addition, we moored three sound sources in the southern Brazil Basin. They transmit an 80-second signal daily needed for RAFOS float tracking. At the end of the floats' mission they are expected to surface, and an ARGOS satellite link will be used to retrieve the data. 3.4 PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY M 22/5 The main objective during leg 5 was a set of observations by the Marine Physics group of the zonal section A10 along 30°S as is part of the "WOCE Hydrographic Programme" (WHP). The primary goal was to map the large-scale three-dimensional distribution of temperature, salinity, and chemical constituents of seawater and to determine heat and water transports. The knowledge of these transports is essential for the understanding of physical processes in the ocean and the atmosphere which are relevant to the change of climate. In addition, these data serve together with other data sets as initial conditions for numerical ocean circulation models and can be used to verify model predictions. As the section through the center of the South Atlantic subtropical gyre is crossing the Brazil Current on the western side and the Benquela Current in the east close to the African continent, the observational programme was intensified there. In combination with observations from the previous legs the survey started at the South American continental shelf with high resolution CTD measurements in the Brazil Current area. In order to obtain data from independent methods, expendable temperature probes (XBT), acoustic current profilers (ACDP) and free-falling current profilers (XCP) were used to resolve the structure of this boundary current. The same methods were applied in the Benquela Current region. On average, CTD stations were spaced approximately 30 nautical miles apart, with higher resolution in the boundary current regions and over complicated topography. Pressure, temperature, conductivity, and oxygen were measured continuously in the vertical up to the bottom. In addition, 20-40 water samples were taken on every station for the determination of hydrographical and geochemical parameters. 3.5 MARINE CHEMISTRY The investigations on the oceanic carbonate system which started a few years ago in the Chemical Department of the Institut für Meereskunde (IfM) Kiel were continued during M 22/5. The background for these studies is the question of how much of the anthropogenic CO2 is stored in the ocean. About 6 Gt C are presently emitted per year into the atmosphere as CO2 by fossil fuel combustion and deforestation. From this, 3 Gt C remain in the atmosphere and cause an annual increase of the atmospheric CO2 content by about 1.5 ppm, resulting in today's CO2 content of almost 360 ppm in the northern hemisphere. The remaining 3 Gt C are taken up by the ocean and/or the terrestrial biosphere. The relative effectiveness of these sinks is uncertain. However, this is an important question with respect to the prediction of the future CO2 content in the atmosphere. Model calculations and estimates based on measurements give a range of 0.5 - 2.5 Gt C for the annual uptake of CO2 by the ocean. In order to improve our understanding of the ocean as a sink for anthropogenic CO2, we applied two different experimental approaches: First, the partial pressure differences of CO2 (DpCO2) were measured at the air/sea interface. This quantity is the driving force for the CO2 exchange and, by multiplication with appropriate exchange coefficients, gives the CO2 flux at the sea surface. The anthropogenic input may then be estimated by balancing the CO2-fluxes on a global scale. Difficulties with this approach arise from the high spatial and seasonal variability of pCO2 which is due to different processes: changes in temperature, convection and formation of organic matter. A measuring system (equilibrator/IR-spectrometer) was therefore developed which measures pCO2 continuously while the ship is steaming. Secondly, the storage of anthropogenic CO2 is calculated from the distribution of total carbonate in the water column. Due to elevated CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere caused by human activity, the total carbonate concentration in surface water today is higher than before the onset of industrialization. Taking into account a correction for carbonate resulting from the oxidation of organic matter, the anthropogenic contribution can be calculated and tracked by using the depth distribution of carbonate. The total carbonate concentrations as well as alkalinity were measured for this purpose in samples from the hydrocasts. In order to enhance data density, two systems were used for the coulometric total carbonate determination and the alkalinity titration. Additionally, the marine chemistry group was responsible for the determination of nutrients and oxygen on the WHP section. According to WOCE requirements, the full set of samples is analyzed on the basis of WOCE criteria for data precision. The data are used for the identification of water masses as well as for the calculation of anthropogenic CO2 stored in different water masses. 3.6 BIOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY AND MARINE TAXONOMY M 22/5 This survey was part of a long-term programme to describe the taxonomy, zoogeography and ecology of ichthyoplankton, planktonic Gammaridea and some other selected invertebrates from the entire Atlantic Ocean. Quantitative plankton sampling by uniform methods allows assessments of distribution patterns and particularly of areas of reproduction. A comparison of areas of reproduction with regional hydrographic features allows the evaluation of those physical environmental parameters limiting reproduction or affecting larval survival. While generally sampling has been carried out from two surface microlayers down to 200m depth, during M 22/5 only neuston sampling was done. More intense surveys in the North Atlantic already allowed to elucidate faunistic boundaries, recently including respective seasonal and even interannual changes. In the South Atlantic, similar investigations have been made in the southeastern and southwestern shelf areas by Argentine and Spanish groups. However, the ichthyoplankton geography of the open subtropical South Atlantic is largely, and the Gammaridea plankton geography is completely unknown. During the cruise, emphasis was placed on sampling and on the analysis of qualitative as well as quantitative faunistic differences between the shelf, the continental slope, the boundary current regimes and the central southern subtropicalgyre. 3.7 TRACER STUDIES M 22/5 In addition to the classical hydrographic data, the measurements of anthropogenic tracers provide parameters for water mass analysis. They are particularly important for the determination of water mass transports and mixing processes because of their well-known input history at the ocean surface. In cooperation with the Marine Physics group measurements were carried out of the CFMs F11, F12, F113, and CCl4 and samples for 3-He, tritium and 14-C were taken. CCl4 is of special interest since the release of this substance to the atmosphere and thus to the oceans started much earlier than that of other tracers. Therefore it is a useful property for characterizing old water masses. Measurable CFM and tritium concentrations are found within the thermocline down to about 1000m depth and particularly in the western boundary current regime. The zonal section A10 of the WOCE programme crossed the Brazil and Angola Basins and the northern Cape Basin. In the Brazil Basin the North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW) at the continental slope, and the Antarctic Bottom Water (AABW) and Antarctic Intermeditate Water (AAIW) north of the Vema and Hunter Channels were of special interest. The main purpose of the planned work was to monitor the tracer concentrations of these water masses and to compare them with results from earlier cruises further north. Up to now observations in the Angola Basin and in most parts of the Cape Basin displayed tracer concentrations of deep water masses below the detection limit, except for CCl4. One question to be answered was whether the CCl4 (which was found on A9 at 19°S at the eastern slope of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge) originates from the Cape Basin. Contributions to 3-He were expected due to tritium decay in Central Water masses and due to admixture of waters of Pacific origin within the deep and bottom waters. CFMs were measured on the majority of the water samples. Sampling of 3He and tritium was restricted to about every third station, but had high vertical resolution. No large volume sampling was performed. Small volume 14C sampling was done, and the subsequent analysis will be carried out by the Institut für Umweltphysik of Heidelberg University. The obtained data are part of the expected large WOCE tracer data set for the South Atlantic. 3.8 ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS M 22/5 Aerosol particles (AP) over the South Atlantic are mainly influenced by two sources: seasalt-AP and aged continental background aerosol. Probably mineral AP of the Namib Desert in Southwest Africa could also contribute to the marine AP. During M 22/5 the size distribution of the marine AP in the size range of 0.005 mm to about 50mm radius was determined. The ocean is an important source of biological AP. These are able to form ice nuclei and thus contribute to cloud formation. Up to now little is known about the biological portion of the marine AP. Therefore particles of this type were determined in the radius range >0.2 mm. The capability of AP to take up water vapor is dependent on both size and solubility of the AP. The present knowledge of the solubility of AP is low. Therefore it was important to investigate the size- dependent soluble part of the AP. Moreover, the carbonaceous part of the AP was analyzed in order to determine the contributions in particle or biogenic AP form. Rainwater samples from this clean-air region were analyzed with regard to acidity, total concentration of soluble mass, and major anions for a comparison with similar properties in polluted areas. 4 NARRATIVE OF THE CRUISE 4.1 LEG M 22/1 (W. Balzer) At 12:12 p.m. of September 22 METEOR left the harbour of Hamburg with 33 crew members, 2 meteorologists, 2 scientific guests from the University of Las Palmas (Gran Canaria) and 11 geologists and marine chemists from the University of Bremen. After several hours allowing maximal speed for METEOR the weather changed: as a consequence of permanent headwinds and opposing currents the effective speed was much less than expected all the way until the end of the English Channel. In order to test the instruments for subsequent purposes a profile of the Hudrosweep and the Parasound echo sounder across the Celtic margin was recorded (station 462-92 and 463-92; Fig.2), where a large multinational project of the European Community is to be started in 1993. After a further test of the in situ camera in the Biscaya, the METEOR sailed directly to the first mooring position 60nm north of the Gran Canaria (station 465-92). Within less than 7 hours the mooring CI1 was recovered and the mooring CI2 was deployed successfully both equipped with 2 sediment traps and a current meter. The long-term mooring CI1 had been deployed during cruise M 20 as part of a cooperative programme of Spanish institutions and Kiel University. At all stations, where moored sediment traps had to be recovered and/or deployed for long-term studies of the seasonality of the particle sedimentation by the geologists of Bremen University, several other devices were deployed regularly: several holes using the multinet in different depth ranges were taken for studies of the plankton composition, an underwater camera was operated for in-situ studies of sinking and suspended particles; for investigations of trace element cycling, in-situ-pumps were used at different water depths to collect suspended particles from 400-900 L seawater, and GoFlo-bottles were taken for contamination-free sampling of dissolved trace elements; mostly at the end of the station work, sediments were sampled using a multicorer to which a CTD-O2- transparency probe was attached for continuous recordings of seawater properties. After a short trace element sampling of the top 400 m of the water column near Cape Blanc, a new mooring (Sta.467-92) with sediment traps (CV1) was deployed south of the Cabo Verde Islands at 11°29.0N, 21° 01.0W followed by sampling of the water column and of the sediment. This programme - as outlined above - took 17 hours at a water depth of 5000 m. During transit to the main study area in the equatorial Atlantic, another short sampling programme for trace elements was performed in the upper water column at 7°50N, 16°55W. The stations for trace element work both north of and within the Intertropical Convergence Zone served to investigate the dissolution behaviour of Sahara born particles with and without previous digestive action of slightly acidic rain. The week spent between 3°N and 6°S in the Guinea Basin was filled with the recovery of 3 moorings (EA6, EA7, EA8; Sta.469-92, 470-92, 471-92) with 2-4 sediment traps and the re-deployment of the mooring EA9 (Sta.470-92 at 00°01.0 S, 10°48.4 W) supplemented by water column and sediment sampling as mentioned before. These studies of the seasonal particle sedimentation at several positions within the equatorial upwelling region will provide information about the productivity gradients between the centre, the northern and the southern edge of this important upwelling region. These stations extend the 20°W-transect of the Joint Global Ocean Flux Study (JGOFS) southwards. Trap deployments near the Canary Islands, near the Cabo Verde Islands and in the Guinea Basin increase the data base from regions with low mixed layer depth but high productivity conditions resulting from equatorial or coastal upwelling. After crossing the Intertropical Convergence Zone and entering the region of SE trade winds, the sea surface temperature cooled down from 29°C to 22°C, the air temperature near the Equator fell to 21°C and the sky was permanently clowdy. By leaving the last station in the Guinea Basin at Oct.10, the last week of our cruise began with 965 miles of pure sailing to our next mooring position in the northern Brasil Basin. With prevailing clowdy weather, moderate temperatures and showers from time to time we occupied the station (Sta.472-92) in the afternoon of Oct.16, too late to start with the deployment of the mooring. For security reasons this kind of work requires daylight and some extra time for unforeseen events during deployment, and work for moorings was always put to the early morning hours. Work at this station therefore was started with water and plankton sampling and filtering of large water volumes for collecting SPM and with 2 deployments of the in-situ camera. Beginning at 06.15h (ship time) the next morning we deployed the mooring WA1 with 3 sediment traps and a current meter within 3 hours; finally, the multicorer brought well filled tubes of red/brown deep sea clay from a water depth of 5500 m. Because the regular programme of station work was completed without any complications, there was extra time available for time-comsuming in-situ pumping near the sea floor for studies of resuspension processes. After one day of sailing the Meteor reached at its last and southernmost station of this leg. Following water, plankton and particle sampling during the night, the mooring WA2 was deployed at 7° 31.3 S, 28°02.5 W in the early morning of Oct.19. Further deployments of the in-situ camera and of the in-situ pumps, an unsuccessful trial with the multicorer and the recording of a well resolved profile of the T-S-O2-transparency probe in the water column filled the day until we had to leave for Recife at 18.00h. Right in time at 08.54h of Oct.21 we reached at the quays of Recife being happy that we had completed 90% of our programme within the short time for scientific work as compared to the long time needed for sailing roughly 6000 miles. 4.2 LEG M 22/2 (M. Rhein) Seven members of the scientific crew arrived in Recife on October 20 and started a day later to unload the containers and to install the scientific equipment on METEOR. The scientific crew was completed on October 22 by the arrival of 14 scientists from Kiel and by Prof. Dr. Edmo Campos from the Hydrographic Institute of the University Sao Paulo, Brazil and Captainlieutenant Ramos as the Brazilian observer. Unfortunately, the plate to mount an ADCP (Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler) in the ship's well was unavailable on board. To build one with the help of the ship's crew was postponed, we first wanted to investigate how good the installed, and recently renovated shipborne- ADCP worked. METEOR left the port of Recife on October 23, 10:00 a.m., heading northward (Fig. 1d and 3). At sea, the shipborne ADCP registered continually the velocities down to about 300 m depths, and as the ship reached deep water, XBTs were dropped every 10-15 nautical miles (Fig. 1d) to resolve the temperature field down to 750 m depth. Two CTD stations and measurements of the instantaneous current fields with an ADCP attached to the rosette (lADCP) and with the Pegasus Profiling system (Pegasus stations S6, S7) were carried out on October 24, 0:00 at 5°8 S, 34°836' W and 34°854' W. The CTD was mounted in a 24 bottle (10 l) rosette, where 2 bottles had been sacrificed to place the ADCP. Besides temperature and conductivity, an oxygen sensor was used, which was calibrated by oxygen titration of samples from the 10 l bottles. The Freon (F11, F12) measurements from water samples completed the programme. All systems worked well and received reliable data. A short circuit on October 25 destroyed some of the Freon analytical gear, but it could be repaired with the help of the ship's electronic technician. After this event, the Freon measurements worked well during the whole cruise. Only the new broad band ADCP (BBADCP), delivered to METEOR on October 23, and especially dedicated to measure velocities in the deep ocean failed to communicate. After reaching the 44°8 W section, the transport of the North Brazil Current (NBC) along the Brazilian shelf was surveyed with the shipborne ADCP on October 26 from 1°800' S, 44°824' W to 0°801' N, 44°824' W. On October 27 and 28, after carefully surveying the bottom with Hydrosweep, and after the evaluation of the ship's drift, three moorings were deployed off the Brazilian coast (mooring K359: 0°814.6' N 44°818.6' W; K360: 0°837' N, 44°810' W; K361: 1°811.2' N 44° 802.7' W). Each mooring is equipped with upward looking ADCPs, which measure the currents in the upper 300m, and with 7-9 conventional Aanderaa current meters. As surface currents around 2kn were present at the mooring locations, the deployment of the moorings over the stern of the ship was more convenient than over the side. The CTD- and Pegasus profiling at the 44°8 W section was continued till October 31, where we reached our northernmost position at 6°840' N. Two CTD stations were placed north of the Ceara Ridge (5°842.4' N and 6°804.6' N) to estimate a likely flow of lower North Atlantic Deep Water on this northern path. On the way to 4°80' N, 35°80' W, starting on October 31, 2:00 p.m., the shipborne ADCP was exchanged by an ADCP mounted in the ship's well because the former instrument worked only in the depth ranges to 230-300m, and got no data above 30m. The new ADCP received good signals even in the upper bins above 30m and down to 270-400m. Additionally XBTs were launched every 10nm. To shorten the time needed to retrieve the Pegasus probe, a terminal showing the acoustic ranging of the probe from the ship has been installed on the bridge. Subsequently, the time for Pegasus retrievals decreased from 40-60 min to 13-20 min. The 35°8W section was reached on November 12, and began with 4 CTD stations to 2500 m depth. South of 1°8N, the CTD was again lowered to the bottom. A first test of the BBADCP was carried out on November 2. It was lowered to 7m depth to study the appropriate parameter setting for using it when attached to the rosette. The first deep profile with the BBADCP was obtained on November 4 parallel to a Pegasus drop at 0° 846 S, 34°859.5' W (S2). But the data showed time gaps by up to half an hour preventing the evaluation of the velocity field below 1500 m. This failure could not be repaired during the cruise. At the southern end of the 35°8 W section four bottom transponders (at each location two) were deployed at 3°859' S, 34°857' W, (S14) and at 4°830' S, 35°805' W, (S15), November 6 to 7 after surveying the bottom topography with Hydrosweep. Their distances were carefully measured. S14 is located in a 20 sm broad channel which is about 3500 m deep and bordered by elevations up to 18 m depth; the southeast flowing deep water seems to be guided by that channel. The CTD/ADCP work on that section continued till November 7, 07:00 p.m. when we reached the shelf at 5°801' S, 35°800' W. After proceeding to the 5°8 S section the work began with a shallow CTD station. We repeated the measurements at the Pegasus station S6 (5°839' S, 34°854' W), where profiles already had been taken on October 24. The Pegasus and the shipborne-ADCP data showed distinct vertical structures in the velocity profiles which remained almost coherent for the duration of the stationwork, but disappeared a few miles farther offshore. On the other hand, they were present along our transit route to 44°8 W. To study this phenomenon further, profiles from shipborne-ADCP and data from the lADCP, lowered to 250 m depth, were combined and the ship stayed at the S6 position for another two hours. On 9 November, the lADCP failed due to water leakage. It could not be fully replaced by the BBADCP, as this instrument was only capable to cover the upper 1500m of the water column. To complete the current field measurements of the 5°8 S section, two additional Pegasus stations at 5°815' S, 32°800' W (S16) and at 5°810' S, 31°830' W (S17) have been installed on November 10. On this section, also Tritium and Helium samples have been taken from the 10 l Niskin bottles. They will be analyzed at the Institut fuer Umweltphysik, Heidelberg. The easternmost CTD station was done at 5°8 S, 30°80' W and on November 11, METEOR headed southwest to 10°8 S 32°830' W. On the way, 4 shallow (1500 m) CTD stations were carried out as well as XBT drops every 10nm. The expected splitting of the South Equatorial Current in a northwest flowing North Brazil Current and a southward flowing Brazil Current was also surveyed with the vessel-mounted ADCP. The 10°8 S section began on November 13, 1:00 p.m. with deep CTD stations to the bottom and the BBADCP attached to the rosette. The BBADCP profiles were valid for the upper 1500 m. Altogether 10 CTD stations have been carried out on that section, which ended on November 14, 11:00 p.m. The ship headed north towards Recife, where we arrived on November 15, 11:00 a.m. 4.3 LEG M 22/3 (T.J. Müller) On November 16, G. Siedler had taken over the chief scientist's duties from M. Rhein. During the following two days the captain and the chief scientist communicated frequently with the German Embassy in Brasilia in order to obtain a decission on the clearance for work in the 200nm zone from the Brazilian government. On November 18, a message was received which said that clearence could not be expected. Upon the request of the German Embassy for G. Siedler to leave the ship and to travel to Brasilia for a discussion about open questions with Brazilian authorities, the chief scientist's duties were transferred to T.J. Müller. About two hours before the ship's departure a telephone message was received through the Brazilian observer indicating that clearence was given. METEOR left Recife on November 18, at 10:00 p.m. with 10 scientists and technicians from the Institut für Meereskunde Kiel (IfMK), Germany, and with the Brazilian observer from the Diretoria Hidrografia e Navegacao (DHN), Niteroi, RJ, Brazil. Heading south to the main working area on the Sao Paulo Plateau, a test station was carried out for the vertically profiling CTD/rosette and a new acoustic release system on 13°857.4' S, 36°816.6' W. Then, the westernmost channel of the Victoria-Trinidade Ridge was surveyed with METEOR's multibeam echo sounding system Hydrosweep for determining the sill depth. It turned out that the channel is very narrow, 1 to 2nm, and shallows from the northeast from more than 1800m towards the southwest to less than 1000m. The channel ends here and the sill depth located at 19°837' S, 38°826' W is less than 950m. It is thus possible that Antarctic Intermediate Water can pass this channel on its way north. During the earlier cruise M 15 in 1991, an anti-cyclonic doming of the upper thermocline was observed just south of the Vitoria-Trinidade Ridge. It could be a topographically controlled permanent feature. A section with three CTD stations and some deep-reaching XBTs (1300m) at 6nm (Fig. 4) nominal distance were carried out. Doming could be observed again, but the signal was very weak. Proceeding further south to the Sao Paulo Plateau, the large-scale structure of the main thermocline was observed with XBTs spaced horizontally at 20nm. Most of these profiles were taken outside the 200nm zone. On November 25, a mooring carrying a sound source was deployed outside the 200nm zone. It is part of an array aimed at studying the flow field at mid-depth by neutrally-buoyant drifting floats (RAFOS). After having launched the mooring, a CTD section was carried out, with a total of 25 stations between the 3000m and 200m depth contour normal to the continental shelf with a station distance of 60nm each. On this section also three Brazil Current meter moorings 333/BE, 334/BM and 335/BW were recovered on November 26 and 27. METEOR finished the leg in Santos on November 30 at 09:18 a.m. 4.4 LEG M 22/4 (W. Zenk) In Santos/Brazil W. Zenk took over as chief scientist from T.J. Müller on November 30, 1992. On the morning of December 2, METEOR left port at 8:00 a.m. (*Fig. 5a) and sailed directly towards mooring position 906/DB1 near 28°8 S, 44°8 W. In addition to 33 crew members 19 scientists were on board the ship. This number included team members (*Fig. 5b) from Kiel, Sao Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, and Woods Hole. The official observer from Brazil, Capt. J.M. Ramos, stayed on board. He had previously joined the ship in Recife (22/2). The main work was concerned with mooring activities which had begun during the previous leg in the Brazil Current region and continued during most of leg 3. Initially we recovered the Woods Hole moorings 906/DB1-909/DB4 without any difficulties. Unfortunately the acoustic release of 910/DB5 failed, and after extensive unsuccessful release attempts, this mooring had to be given up. On December 2, the sound source mooring 350/K2 was deployed on the western Vema terrace. Next moorings 337/VW and 338/VE were recovered from the western shoulder and the Vema Sill. A second mooring was lost when we were unable to communicate or release 337/VM. We had better luck with 343/DBK and 912/DB6, both situated on the eastern Vema terrace. To summarize, by December 7 eight moorings had been recovered which originally had been deployed in early January 1991 from METEOR (M 15). Further logistical details can be found in the attached mooring inventory (chapter 7.3.3). In the inner Vema district the narrowly-spaced CTD section from the 1991 expedition was repeated although with a reduced number of stations. Further stations were occupied on the way to the Hunter Channel. Besides CTD observations surface drifters and RAFOS floats were deployed. During the cruise the scientific party gathered at irregular intervals to discuss scientific issues and the next day's schedule. Seminars on various topics of the South Atlantic and applied research methods were given. Contributions werde made by colleages from all three participating countries. Slowed down by strong easterly winds the Hunter region was approached on December 11. Hours earlier METEOR had occupied the deepest station of the cruise at a depth of 5146 m. Due to poor weather conditions we were unable to perform the intended bathymetric survey with Hydrosweep, the shipborne multibeam echosounder. By December 15, we had managed to launch seven moorings across the Hunter Channel. They consist of a zonal row of six current meter moorings (H1-/H6) and one sound source (K0) mooring. A difficult situation arose when a severe storm appeared in a very short time and the ongoing deployment of mooring H3 could not be finished properly. The problem was solved by a brave zodiac maneuver. On December 13, all work had to be terminated until the storm weakened the next day. After the mooring work was completed the Hunter region was left, heading due NW. On December 16, an additional mooring was installed close to the bottom on the eastern flank of the Rio Grande Rise. A final mooring deployment (K3) was performed on the return leg to Rio de Janeiro. In this case we combined near-bottom current meters with a sound source at about 1000m depth. At the end of these activities METEOR sailed on a northwesterly course towards the Brazilian shelf. Underway we launched all remaining RAFOS floats and the satellite- tracked, surface drifting buoys. Further observations of the upper- ocean thermal structure were done by two-hourly spaced XBT drops on the return leg. These data were transmitted through the Global Telecommunication System of the World Meterological Organization (WMO) in a near-real-time. Approaching the shelf nine XCP probes were dropped in order to analyze the vertical structure of the Brazil Current. METEOR called port at Rio de Janeiro in the morning of December 22, 1992. 4.5 LEG M 22/5 (R. Onken) METEOR left Rio de Janeiro on December 27, 1992 at 6:00 p.m. The first destination was the test station no. 620/92 located at waypoint A (see *Fig. 7). Because METEOR crossed the Brazil Current on its way to the test station, the temperature and velocity structure of this current were recorded with XBT drops and the shipborne ADCP (S-ADCP). On the station all instruments were tested and the scientists familiarized themselves with their usage. As the overside ADCP (lADCP) was not yet ready for use, another test station was occupied in the early evening. Here, the lADCP passed its first test successfully. Afterwards METEOR headed for waypoint B. Between B and C the Brazil Current was crossed for the second time and was surveyed again with XBT and S-ADCP. METEOR turned at C and hydrographic stations were conducted with a horizontal resolution of 10nm between C and B. To the east of B the interval between the stations increased to 30nm. 30°8 S was reached at waypoint D for the first time. For the next weeks, METEOR sailed eastward along this line (*Fig. 6) passing the Vema Channel, the eastern part of the Rio Grande Rise, the northward directed dead end of the Argentine Basin, the eastern extension of the Rio Grande Rise, the southern Brazil Basin, the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, the southern Angola Basin, the Walvis Ridge, and the northern Cape Basin. A northward detour was done over the Walvis Ridge because of the complicated topography. The intervals between stations varied between 9 and 45nm (chapter 7.4.1, *Fig. 8) in order to ensure that the water depth between two successive stations should not differ by more than 1000m. At 11°850' E the 30°8 S latitude was left and the station programme was continued in east-northeast direction for two reasons. On the one hand the section was planned to cut the Benguela Current at nearly a right angle, and on the other hand the 200nm zone of the Republic of South Africa had to be avoided because no application for reasearch permission had been made. Here, the station interval was reduced to 20nm. The last station was located on the African shelf at a water depth of about 200m. Because of a bad weather forecast for the following days, the measurement activities were finished in the afternoon of January 28, although 16 hours of spare time were still available, and METEOR headed for Cape Town and arrived there in the afternoon of January 30. 5 PRELIMINARY RESULTS 5.1 MARINE GEOLOGY AND MARINE CHEMISTRY DURING M22/1 5.1.1 DEPLOYMENTS AND SAMPLING (U. Rosiak, M. Kalberer, V. Ratmeyer, U. Kuller, M. Bleckwehl, G. Fischer, A. Zimmermann, H. Buschhoff, W. Balzer) For sampling in the water column, a multiple closing net (multinet), in-situ pumps, GoFlo bottles and a Photosea under-water camera system were used. From the ships' membrane pump which is installed in 3.5 m water depth, 1-2 L of seawater were filtrated three times daily for subsequent chlorophyll (Chl a) analysis. For the sampling of sediment with undisturbed surface, a multi-corer was used at five stations. The primary goal during the cruise was the recovery and/or the deployment of moorings containing sediment traps and current meters; *Fig. 9a, b show the positions in the Atlantic where moorings were deployed during M23/1 or previous cruises dealing with the same objectives. Details for the individual sampling devices are given in the following paragraphs 5.1.2-5.1.9. A summary of the occupied stations including the list of equipment used is given in the station list (see chapter 7.1.1). 5.1.2 PARTICLE FLUX WITH SEDIMENT TRAPS (G. Fischer, M. Kalberer, V. Ratmeyer, U. Rosiak, U. Kuller, M. Bleckwehl) Deployment and recovery data for all moorings as well as the sampling data of the traps are listed in Ch. 7.1.2. North of Gran Canaria (CI2), south of Cabo Verde (CV1), in the eastern (EA9) and in the western equatorial upwelling area (WA1 and WA2) mooring arrays with 2-4 multisample sediment traps and current meters were deployed. The mooring "Canary Islands No.1" (CI1) deployed during M20/1 was completely recovered on September 9. Both traps had worked perfectly providing 40 samples in total. 20m underneath the upper traps a special current meter instrument developed by the group of Prof. Krause (AWI) recorded current speed, direction, temperature and conductivity as well as backscattering and fluorescence. At the same site, we redeployed the mooring (CI2) which will be recovered during M23/3. A new mooring ("Cabo Verde No.1", CV1) with two traps and one RCM8 was installed at about 11°30 N and 21°W close to the divergence of the North Equatorial Current and the North Equatorial Counter Current. It is intended to recover and re-deploy these instruments during M23/3. Between October 9 and October 12 we successfully recovered the moorings EA6, EA7 and EA8 located on a north-south transect in the eastern equatorial upwelling area. Except for one trap from the EA8 site, all other traps (7) had sampled continuously; *Fig.10a-c gives a first impression of the seasonal sedimentation of particles in 598m, 1833m and in 2890m water depth between Dec.12, 1991 and Oct.6, 1992 (see Ch. 7.1.2). The trap in 1255m did not sample properly. At the EA7 site, we redeployed an array with 3 traps and one current meter (EA9) on October 10. All instruments will be recovered in April 1993 (M23/3). We finally installed two mooring systems with five traps and two current meters in the western equatorial Atlantic at approximately 25°W and 4°and 7°S. They are part of a SW-NE transect over the western equatorial upwelling area which will be completed with a third mooring further north during M23/3. 5.1.3 IN-SITU PARTICLE CAMERA SYSTEM (V. Ratmeyer, U. Rosiak) For the determination of the particle concentration, its size distribution and the aggregate composition in the upper 600m of the water column, a high-resolution fotocamera system was employed. It was designed and improved according to experience with similar systems as described by Honjo et al. (1984), Asper (1987) and Lampitt (1985). This method provides in-situ information on the origin and the abundance of particles and aggregates (marine snow). In addition to the use of sediment traps, particle flux can be measured with this method even at sites with high lateral transport. We used a 70mm deep-sea camera (model PHOTOSEA 70) with 45.7m film capacity providing an acceptable optical resolution. Two 150 Ws strobelights (model PHOTOSEA 1500S) were installed as light sources. The illuminating beam was collimated by a pair of highly refractive fresnel-lenses mounted inside a steelframe at focal distance in front of the strobes. Camera and light sources were installed in orthogonal position thus avoiding backscattering by water molecules and highly hydrated particles. The system is fixed inside a collapsible frame 200 x 80 x 80 cm, which is made of 48 mm (o.d.) galvanized steel pipe. The weight of the complete system is approximately 130 kg in air. The camera and the strobe-collimator unit can be slided to any position inside the frame (see *Figure 11). The whole system was testet during the M22/1 cruise for the first time. During its descend to 600m water depth the camera was triggered continuously by a computer on deck of the ship. Typically every 5 m one picture was shot while lowering the system with a speed of 0.3m/sec. The flash duration of < 1/10.000 second was short enough to get sharp pictures of particles down to a size of 100m using Kodak Tri X Pan Film. The pictures show variant particle and plankton concentrations through 500m water depth, with maximal concentrations in the upper 30m. 5.1.4 CTD-O2-TRANSPARENCY PROBE (G. Fischer, V. Ratmeyer) For continuous records of seawater properties, a CTD-profiler (SEABIRD SBE 19) was equipped with an oxygen sensor and a 25 cm side view transmissometer (SEATECH). This unit was attached to the wire 20 m above the multicorer in most cases. At ten stations the raw data were immediately transfered from the self-contained instrument to a computer. Downcast standard plots were produced which subsequently served for the selection of sampling depths for the deployment of in- situ pumps and GoFlo-bottles. Measured oxygen values were compared to those of the WINKLER titration: while the shape of both oxygen profiles was almost identical, the in-situ oxygen concentrations were generally lower by 0.5-0.7ml/L than the discrete bottle values. This may be due to the alterations of the three years old O2-membrane. A typical profile obtained with the self-contained probe is depicted in *Fig. 12. Most instructive for the positioning of other devices was the O2-profile: its concentration reaching down to almost 1ml/L shows two distinct minima at 100m and 500m water depth; the concentration increased rapidly downwards to approximately 5ml/L in the North Atlantic Deep Water. Just below the deeper O2-minimum the core of the Antarctic Intermediate Water can be recognized by its salinity minimum. Except for the top 50m the light beam attenuation (LBA) was generally very low. 5.1.5 PLANKTON SAMPLING USING THE MULTINET (M. Kalberer, U. Kuller, V. Ratmeyer, G. Fischer) Plankton was sampled with a multiple closing net (multi-net, Fa. HYDROBIOS) with 0.25m opening and 64 micrometer mesh size. It was used for vertical holes at seven sites. At each site, 2-3 holes with different depth-intervals were conducted (see: 7.1.1). The standard depths were: 1) to 1000 m water depth with the intervals 1000-500m, 500-300m, 300-100m, 100-50m, 50-0m. 2) to 400 m water depth with the intervals 400-200m, 200-100m, 100- 40 m, 40-20m, 20-40m. 3) to 250 m water depths with the intervals 250-100m, 100-75m, 75- 50m, 50-25m, 25-0m. The samples containing mostly zooplankton and only small amounts of phytoplankton were carefully rinsed with seawater and transferred to KAUTEX bottles. After fixation with mercury chloride to reduce bacterial action the samples were stored at 4°C. 5.1.6 CONTINUOUS CHLOROPHYLL A MEASUREMENTS (M. Kalberer, V. Ratmeyer, G. Fischer) For the determination of chlorophyll concentrations of surface waters, 1-2L seawater taken 3 times a day from the membrane pump (inlet in 3.5m water depth) were filtrated onto glass fibre filters and deep frozen at -20°C. Chla measurements will be done in the home laboratory. Up to now, chla data are available from several Meteor cruises in the Atlantic Ocean (M6/6, M9/4, M12/1/2, M16/1/2, M20/1/2). These data will be compared to values derived from fluorescence measurements of an in-situ probe (Prof. Krause, AWI). 5.1.7 IN-SITU FILTRATION OF SUSPENDED PARTICLES (W.Balzer, H.Buschhoff, F.Gonzales Palma, D.Schneider, A.Zimmermann) Within the German JGOFS project "Vertical transport of particulate trace elements in the equatorial upwelling region" the distribution of dissolved trace elements has to be compared with their concentration in suspended particulate material (SPM), in particles caught with sediment traps and in sediments. The main objectives are (i) the deepening of our general knowledge about the control of trace element distribution by interaction with biogenic and abiotic particles and (ii) to investigate how particle sedimentation in a high-productivity region affects the vertical trace element distribution. Within the 3 main classes of elements (according to their vertical distribution grooped into: "conservative", "nutrient-type", "scavenged") as many elements as possible at acceptable accuracy will be determined in different matrices (see also: Research Programme). Three particulate phases were sampled using different techniques: (i) the SPM to be filtered using in-situ pumps is supposed to consist of slowly sinking biogenic and terrestrial detritus exhibiting a large surface area for sorptive processes, (ii) the material caught with intercepting sediment traps consists of larger, faster sinking particles which incorporated trace elements during their formation in the ocean's top layer and by scavenging of SPM, (iii) the sediment represents in that respect the ultimate result of all water column processes and early diagenetic modifications near the sediment/water interface. In addition to the determination of trace element concentrations, emphasis will be put to the analysis of carrier phases such as carbonate, organic carbon, opal and lithogenics. Therefore aliquots of the trap material (see chapter 7.1.2) will be analyzed at home for trace and major components after digestion with nitric and hydrofluoric acid. Due to the low concentration of SPM larger volumes of seawater have to be filtered, if trace elements are to be analyzed in SPM. Between 200 L and 800 L seawater from depths down to 5400 m were filtered through acid cleaned 293 mm Nuclepore filter using an in-situ pump (see chapter 7.1.4). To reduce contamination risks non-metallic wire was used and all handling of the filters was performed under a clean bench. Because in-situ pumping is very time-consuming pumps were combined with bottle casts whenever possible. From pump deployments a total of 39 filters were obtained, 6 of which, however, being torn. 5.1.8 WATER SAMPLING (W.Balzer, H.Buschhoff, F.Gonzales Palma, D.Schneider, A.Zimmermann) At all 7 stations where sediment traps were recovered/deployed 2 casts of 6 GoFlo bottles were taken to analyze the vertical distribution of trace elements in the water column; at stations 466 and 468 only the top 600-800m were sampled in accordance with the respective pump deployments yielding a total of 90 trace element samples. For the trace metal studies precautions had to be taken against the risks of contamination: before use the GoFlo bottles were acid cleaned thoroughly, at stations the bottles were attached to a non-metallic wire, during handling on deck both opening ends were covered with plastic bags, all manipulations after subsampling were performed under a clean bench. When the filled bottles were brought to the lab, dissolved oxygen was subsampled first, followed by a flask for stable isotope analysis that was filled without air-bubbles, poisoned and secured with paraffin; then two plastic containers were filled for trace elements and acidified thereafter using subboiled HNO3; finally sub-samples for nutrient analysis were taken and deep-frozen. When brought back to the home laboratories, selected trace elements (primarily: Ba, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb) will be analyzed, and the vertical and horizontal distribution will be compared with results from the particle analysis. The only component that was determined directly on board was oxygen (by conventional Winkler titration) serving to check the calibration of the in-situ probe. A first evalution provided evidence for a systematic deviation between both sets of oxygen determinations. 5.1.9 SEDIMENT SAMPLING WITH THE MULTICORER (U. Rosiak, G. Fischer, M. Kalberer, V. Ratmeyer, D. Schneider, F. Gonzales Palma) At the five mooring sites CI1/2, CV1, EA7/8, WA1 and WA2, multicorer samples were retrieved from the seafloor. Near-bottom water samples (100 cm3 and 250 cm3) for stable oxygen and carbon isotope analysis were taken from the cores approximately 10cm above the sediment surface. The samples for 13-C analysis were poisoned with mercury chloride; the bottles were sealed with wax and stored at 4°C. About 20ml near-bottom water was taken for nutrient analysis and stored at -20°, too. For benthic foraminifera, two cores (each 10 cm in diameter) were cut into 1 cm segments, stained with bengalrose/ethanol and held cool at 4°C. Samples were also taken for organic compound analysis (frozen at -20°), as well as for the analysis of diatoms, radiolarians and magnetic bacteria assemblages. Two small-sized cores of 6 cm in diameter were used by the marine chemistry group for trace element analysis (see chapter 7.1.4). 5.2 PHYSICAL OCEANGRAPHY M 22/2 5.2.1 CTD MEASUREMENTS AND OXYGEN CALIBRATION (L. Stramma, J. Waniek) The CTD (Neil Brown Mark III) was well operating during the entire leg two of METEOR cruise M22. In total 65 profile were gained (see *Fig. 1b). On most stations reversing thermometers were used to check temperature and pressure and water probes were taken from the bottles to calibrate the salinity and oxygen sensors of the CTD. As the CTD measurements went on until the evening before reaching Recife and as the conductivity and the oxygen sensors showed some time dependence no final data set could be produced before the end of the cruise. Therefore, only a preliminary data set was made from the data with full data rate. Water probes were collected from rosette sampler for measurements of the concentration of dissolved oxygen in seawater. A calibration of the oxygen sensor with the results of the titrated oxygen measurements will be done. The water samples for titration were taken from 10 l bottles directly after collecting samples for Freon measurements. They were filled in 100 ml glass bottles without bubbles and 1 ml of KOH and KJ were immediately added with a dispenser. The titration of the samples was done directly afterwards, using the standard Winkler- method. It was done in the sampling glass-bottles which were made especially for this use, therefore errors arising from filling the samples into other bottles and cleaning bottles were eliminated. The volume of each bottle had been determined in Kiel, where also the reagents had been weighted in portions for 200 ml of distilled water. Afterwards they were packed hermetically. So it was possible to use reagents on board when needed and run all standards and blanks in distilled water. The blank was determined to be 0.06 ml/l and has been taken into account at the determination of oxygen in seawater samples. After every ten CTD stations samples were taken for estimating the repeatability of titrated oxygen, which was found to be 0.016 ml/l. In total 700 oxygen samples from 40 CTD stations were taken. After the first 15 stations (section 44°W) a first estimate was made to calibrate the oxygen sensor. It showed that there was a time-dependent drift of the sensor which vanished during the further cruise. The oxygen sensor normally shows a strong dependence on pressure whereas the oxygen distribution is dependent on temperature. Therefore the calibration of the oxygen sensor has to be made after the final calibration of the temperature and pressure sensors. *Figure 13 shows the salinity distribution from the preliminary data set along the 35°W section from the surface to 1000m depth. At about 100m depth two salinity maxima are present. The maximum at 4°to 5°S near the Brazilian coast with values higher than 37 shows the core of the North Brazil Current which shows its velocity maximum at 35°W in the ADCP measurements in 100 to 150m depth. The salinity maximum between 1°S and 1°N shows the location of the Equatorial Undercurrent. The maximum in salinity with values higher than 36.8 is not found at the equator but at almost 1°S. The probable cause is the adding of salinity-rich water from the North Brazil Current into the southern side of the Equatorial Undercurrent. The Antarctic Intermediate Water (AAIW) can be seen with salinity values less than 34.5 south of 2°N in *Figure 13. In the corresponding TS-diagrams (*Fig. 14) two jumps in salinity are found in the salinity minimum at about 5°C. The lowest salinities of about 34.44 are situated between the coast and two degrees south, where the strongest westward transport of AAIW is expected. The middle part with salinities of about 34.5 is located between two degrees south and 1°30'N. North of 1°30'N the salinity rises to about 34.53. The shift of the TS-curves towards lower salinities in *Fig. 14 below 2°C is the typical sign for the influence of the bottom water, which is known in literature as the two degree discontinuity. A clear difference compared to METEOR cruise 14 (see HINZ et al., 1991) can be seen on the 44°W section. While in October 1990 low surface salinity was found north of 4°N decreasing to salinities of 32.6 at 6°40'N, which shows the presence of Amazon Water being carried to the east by the retroflection of the North Brazil Current into the North Equatorial Counter Current, there was no indication on Amazon Water in October 1992 at 44°W south of 6°40'N. Further comparisons of the CTD values from the different METEOR cruises will be done after the final calibration. 5.2.2 FREON ANALYSIS F11, F12 (M. Rhein, M. Elbrächter) During the cruise, the CFM system worked continuously and about 1400 samples including gas standards measurements have been analysed. At Oct.26, a short circuit destroyed the interface and the electric actuators of 4 valves. Two of them could be repaired, contrary to the interface, so that in the following, the valves had to be switched manually. About 100ml water are transferred from the precleaned Niskin bottles to a purge and trap system with the help of a ground glass syringe. The CFMs are separated on a Gaschromatograph containing a packed stainless steel column filled with Porasil C and detected by electron capture detection (ECD). Calibration is done with a gas standard kindly provided by R. Weiss, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, San Diego. The F11 analysis could be carried out successfully during the cruise, and exhibited a small blank of 0.003pmol/kg, decreasing to 0.001pmol/kg and a reproducibility of ±0.004pmol/kg was obtained. But south of 3° 09'S, 35°W and afterwards the F12 analysis was hindered by an unknown substance with similar retention time as F12, thus making the availability of reliable F12 data more sporadic. As known from the two previous cruises, the CFM maxima in the upper (1800m) and lower deepwater (3800m) are characteristic for the tropical boundary current (*Fig. 15). At 35°W and at 5°S the F11 concentrations of both water masses have increased, and at 44°W the regions with F11 values higher than 0.12 pmol/kg are more extended than in Oct.1990. For the first time we sampled the region north of the Ceara Rise and found high F11 concentrations in the lower deep water, supporting the view, that part of that water mass flows on the northern side of the ridge. The splitting of the upper deep water at the equator is evident in the F11 distributions as well as the confinement of the lower F11 core to south of the equator. Measurements at the 5°S section found the lower F11 core between 34°W and 31°W, so that on the previous cruises, where the section ended at 32°W, we presumably have missed part of the flow. Striking is the increase in F11 concentrations in the Antarctic Bottom Water (AABW) below 4000 m, where it starts with values near the detection limit and increases with depth to concentrations comparable to the lower F11 core, which originates in the Northern Atlantic. At 10°S, the F11-concentrations in AABW exceeds those for the lower deep water from northern origin, but the upper deep water remains the most prominent signal with values >0.05pmol/kg east of 34°W. Its F11 signal has decreased by a factor of two from 5°S to 10°S reflecting its dilution with less ventilated water from the ocean's interior and/or the time dependant increase of the CFM signal. 5.2.3 lADCP (J.Fischer,C.Meinke) At all CTD stations a self-contained lowered Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (lADCP) was attached to the frame of the water sampling rosette. This application gave good results during previous 'Meteor' cruises M14 and M16 and is now routinely used. During the cruise two different ADCPs, a so called 'narrow-band' and a 'broad-band' ADCP were used. The ADCPs measure short (about 200m range) velocity segments while the instrument is lowered and raised through the water column. Every 8 s to 10 s one of these velocity segments is stored inside the ADCP. After the cast the data are retrieved, and the segments are combined to a velocity profile extending from the surface down to the deepest point of the cast. For the first time we used a modified rosette specially suited to mount the ADCP in upright position and to protect the transducers. Further modifications of the lower rosette frame were made with the help of the ship's crew. Now the ADCP can be mounted or removed within a few minutes. After 39 mostly ocean deep profiles one of the tranducers of the 'narrow-band' ADCP broke and water was leaking into the instrument. This instrument could not be used further on the cruise. The deepest profile with the 'narrow-band' ADCP was down to 4670m which is one of the deepest ADCP profiles obtained so far. The first trials with the 'broad-band' ADCP were less successful. This instrument was produced just in time to be send directly to the Meteor in Recife. We had severe problems getting the ADCP working, and there are still large problems to be solved. First, we made some parameter studies with this ADCP in parallel to CTD stations. For this purpose the ADCP was deployed 7m below the surface by using the small krane at the stern of the ship. Then we had three CTD/ADCP casts on stations where Pegasus casts were available. Later, due to the damaging of the 'narrow-band' ADCP the new ADCP was used routinely after station 519. Unfortunately, all stations deeper than 2000m with the new ADCP had large data gaps during the up-cast. The reason for this instrument failure is still unknown. The data evaluation therefore concentrated on the down-cast and on parameter studies. At shallower stations (1500m depth) the new ADCP had no data gaps, and the data quality was comparable to the 'narrow-band' ADCP. At the end of the cruise all ADCP data are preliminary processed; comprising the calculation of velocity profiles, velocity sections along the ships track (sections 44°W, 35°W and partly 5°S) and even first estimates of transports for selected current cores. As an example we show the velocity pattern of the upper 1000m across the meridional section at 44°W (*Fig. 16). Close to the shelf break we observed the North-Brazil Current in the top 500m transporting about 12 Sverdrup (Sv) westwards across the equator. Between 500m and 1000m another 14Sv are flowing westward. Farther to the north we found an eastward flowing undercurrent. The core of this undercurrent lies between 2°N and 3°N at about 200m depth. About 18Sv are flowing eastwards in the layer between 100 and 500 m, and another 9Sv in the 500-1000m layer. At the northern end of the section the highest velocities (up to 150cm/s) associated with the eastward flowing North- Equatorial Counter Current are found. At 5°S the northward flowing North-Brazil Current shows velocities up to 90 cm/s (*Fig. 17). Transport estimates for the upper 500m (14Sv) were of the same magnitude than those observed at 44°W. 5.2.4 MOORING DEPLOYMENTS (J.Fischer, U.Papenburg) A significant contribution to this cruise was the deployment of three current meter moorings in the western boundary current region along the 44°W meridian. The aim of this investigation is to measure the mean circulation in the western boundary current region and fluctuations of the currents and transports on time scales from weeks to seasonal. In combination with two earlier deployments which were partly carried out with the 'Meteor' (during M 14) we should get a detailed picture of the boundary current system between the equator and 2°30'N. The moorings were deployed over the stern of the ship using the A-Frame to lift the instruments. This procedure worked well during the M 14 cruise. Especially at station K359 with variable bottom topography and surface currents of 2 - 3 knots the higher maneuverability of the ship, compared to deploying over the side, was appreciated. a) u-component, b) v-component At all three mooring sites the topography was surveyed and the ships drift was determined prior to the deployment. Thereafter, the moorings were laid out at the surface, and finally the anchor was dropped after the mooring was towed into position (K359 and K360). The final mooring positions are 00°14.6' N, 44°18.6' W (K359 -2880m depth), 00°37' N, 44°10' W (K360 - 3660m depth) and 1°11.15' N, 44°02.7' W (K361 - 4110m depth); the water depth was corrected with respect to sound speed. 5.2.5 XBT PROGRAMME (L. Stramma, G. Kroll) During leg M 22/2 in total 190 XBTs were thrown. The distribution of the XBT drops is shown in *Fig. 3 and in the list in chapter 7.2.2. The XBT sections were carried out in addition to the CTD sections as well as on the transit to 44°W along the Brazilian coast and on the transfer from 44°W to 35°W. *Fig. 18 shows the highly resolved XBT section for the thermocline of the 35°W section. Between 3°30' S and 3°N a clear signal of internal waves with maximum amplitudes of more than 30 meters is found in the thermocline. In addition, the equatorial divergence can be seen with the rising of the 25°and 26°C isotherm between 0°10'S and 1°N. This happens where relatively cold water compared to the surrounding water is moving towards the sea surface. The XBT temperature section between the 44°W section and the 35°W section is presented in *Fig. 19. The distance between two drops was only about 10 miles. The ship ADCP showed in the upper 100 m eastward currents west of 42°W, a strong southeastward current between 37°30'W and 42°W and a northward component between 35°and 37°30'W. From the XBT section it can be seen that the thermocline depths as well as the thermocline thickness decreases in the region of the southeastward flow. Above it water is found which is warmer than in the east and west of this section. In the region of the eastward current at 43°W the mixed layer depth reaches almost 100 m and the thermocline shows a smaller temperature gradient than further to the east. 5.2.6 PEGASUS PROFILING SYSTEM (U. Send, G. Krahmann) As on cruises M14 and M16, the free-falling Pegasus probe was used again to obtain high-resolution profiles of horizontal currents. The acoustic transponders that need to be deployed on the sea floor for this system, already existed from previous years on 20 stations along the sections at 44°W, 35°W, and 5°S. The transponders on 44°W had been deployed in spring 1990 by K. Leaman (RSMAS, Miami) and of the 7 stations occupied, 6 were still operational (2 transponders per station). This means that those transponders (type Benthos) have a lifetime of 2 1/2 years or more, at least in deep water. This is significantly more than the manufacturer's specifications of 2 years. All other transponders on the remaining sections, which we had deployed on M14 and M16, were still fully operational. We deployed four new transponder stations on M22, of which two (S14, S15) now extend the 35°W section all the way to the coast. Station S11 at 1.5°N, which had been planned originally, was not deployed due to time constraints. Instead, towards the end of the cruise, when we were more flexible, two unplanned stations were deployed (S16, S17) in order to extend the 5°S section farther offshore. These stations had been added in the hope to find the lower deep water there, which cannot flow along the coast due to topographic constraints. Also on this cruise, we performed a final test of the Pegasus fins (which make it rotate) versus a "Hula skirt" of several hundred strings of 1m length (to improve the streaming properties). In spite of (or just because of?) the improved skirt (longer, denser) compared to M16, we again observed Hula-type spiraling motions in the Pegasus. As the result, we went back to using the original factory-supplied fins again. The quality of the profiles with these fins is as good (and without spiraling) as with the skirt, as documented in a statistical analysis of the down/up differences (Send, 1993). In that study it was shown that the up/down differences, which had been apparent ever since the M14 cruise, can be explained completely in terms of internal wave variability. One disadvantage of using the fins for the Pegasus was a slower descent rate, which made the profiles take longer than with the skirt. This was improved by doubling the drop weights for the Pegasus, which had no adverse effect on the quality of the profiles. As a result, the Pegasus usually surfaced within 10-30 min of the CTD, which is an ideal time lag to steam back to the starting position. We could also further improve the deck operations for the Pegasus in terms of speed. For example, a PC was installed on the bridge, which displayed acoustic information about the distance to the Pegasus. This made it possible to navigate the ship close the Pegasus even before it had surfaced. As a consequence, the probe usually was on deck within 12-20 min of surfacing. Also the four transponder surveys were carried out very swiftly - the last two took only 2 1/4 each including their deployment. For obtaining sections of directly measured currents, we had two complementary and partially redundant systems in use on this cruise - the Pegasus and the ADCP lowered with the CTD rosette. The ADCP provides better horizontal station resolution, since it can be used at any CTD station independent of transponders being present. The Pegasus has better vertical resolution and currently still is the reference system to test and compare the new ADCP method with. Thus the final sections of currents from this cruise will be a combination of ADCP and Pegasus data. For this reason, we are presenting at this point only the section from 5°S, where the ADCP had failed and the Pegasus provides the only directly measured currents, and we will show observations of some strongly layered jets of 40-70m vertical scale, observed near the coast and especially at station S6. *Figure 20 shows the section of meridional currents along 5°S (the stations at 32°W and 31°30'W are new compared to M14 and M16). A marked structure of alternating bands of north/south currents is visible in the entire depth range of the deep water. Close to the coast, there is a large southward transport from about 1200m to 3800m, thus covering all 4 layers of the deep water. A current core is present in the range of the Labrador Sea deep water. Farther from the coast, at 33°13'W, we have northward currents in the upper 3 layers of the deep water, with a strong core in the uppermost (old) deep water. This current reversal had been observed already on M14 and M16, and thus it seems to be a permanent structure in this region, even though during the previous cruises it only included the 2 layers of the upper deep water. A new feature in our section is another southward current region even more to the east, with 15-20cm/s, covering the Labrador Sea upper deep water down to the lowest deep water, with a core at 3700m. This is the typical depth of the Freon maximum in the lower deep water. This southward flow was not present on M14 and M16. Thus in total, a picture emerges of strong meanders and recirculations, with some permanent features but generally high variability. Another interesting observation is shown in *figure 21. At station S6 we measured strong horizontal jets closely layered in the vertical, which had already been noticed in Pegasus profiles during M14 and M16. On the present cruise, we passed station S6 twice and also this time we had continuous ship-board ADCP data even on station. With that, we could obtain a good view of the temporal stability of these structures, as seen in *figure 21. Preliminary analysis of ship ADCP data suggests that these jets can partially be found along the entire coast to about 40°W. However, they seem to have high spatial variability and strongly changing directions. 5.2.7 VESSEL-MOUNTED ADCP (J. Reppin) The vessel-mounted ADCP is a very valuable instrument for the exploration of the mainly surface intensified currents in this equatorial region, as the earlier cruises (M14 and M16) have shown before. The data set obtained on this cruise is the first complete data set of this season, because the ADCP installed in the hull of the vessel was defect during the cruise in autumn 1990 (M14). We had to install a SC- ADCP (self-contained) in the ships hydrographic well prior to the 35°W section. During M16 we made very good experiences with a VM-ADCP installed in the hydrographic well. At the beginning of the 35°W section we installed another VM-ADCP in the hydrographic well with help of the ship's crew because the VM-ADCP installed in the ship's hull did just reach down to 230 to 300m depth. This Instrument in the well then got ranges between 270 and 400m. Another advantage of this instrument were better data in the top two bins. The profiles recorded are averages of 5 minutes with a ping ever second. Due to a defect of a synchro converter leading to heading dependent offsets of the heading values fed into the ADCP up to 15 degrees, the profiles had to be corrected with the heading values recorded by the central data data processing and recording system DVS. This worked fine for the ship being underway or on station with a nearly constant heading over the period of an ADCP ensemble (5 min.). The profiles during station arrival, station departure and transponder navigation had to be discarded. The following calibration using the difference between on-station-data versus on cruise-data-still worked well. On this cruise we used an own GPS-receiver (MAGNAVOX MX200) as navigation source for the first time. With the help of the board- electricians the antenna was installed at a very good position in the mast. The receiver obtained very good position data for the referencing of the VM-ADCP profiles as well as for the transponder navigation at the Pegasus transponders deployed during this cruise. The difference of the surface current system to the spring situation can clearly be seen in the ADCP data. In contrast to the weak retroflection of the North Brazil Current (NBC) during M16, it is visible in this season. Although the NBC retroflects west of 44°W the strong North Equatorial Counter Current (NECC) is visible in the northern part of our research area. The NBC does show in the VM-ADCP data on the transfer between Recife and the 44°W section and on the first stations on the southern part of the 5°S section already (*Fig. 22). The shelf section at the southern end of the 44°W section revealed a transport of 2Sv across the shelf. At 44°W the equatorward undercurrent is located between 1°N and 3°N (*Figs. 23a, b) with an southeastward maximum at about 225m depth, that seems to feed into the Equatorial Undercurrent (EUC) between about 2°S and 2°N at 35°W (*Figs. 23c, d). On the transsect between 44°W and 35°W the meandering of the retroflected NECC can be seen. The VM-ADCP does not show any inflow of the South Equatorial Current (SEC) into the southern box between 5°S and 10°S. At 10°S the North Brazil Current was observed (NBC?) (*Fig. 22) with a maximum between 200 and 300m. 5.2.8 DVS (J. Reppin, Th. Mitzka) A subsample of the DVS data has been recorded every 2 minutes during the entire cruise. Drift and windmaps (*Figs. 24 and 25) averaged over 0.1 degree have been calculated and plotted on board. The drift mainly shows the structures of surface currents seen in the vesselmounted ADCP. The echosoundings fed into the DVS were used to extract the bottom topography along the sections and the heading data were used to correct the defect ADCP-heading information. 5.3 PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY M 22/3-4 (W. Zenk, T.J. Müller) Here we present four selected highlights as they became available already during the cruise or within a few weeks afterwards. They deal with the Brazil Current as manifested in the hydrography during M 22/3. We further present evidences for a continuous equatorward flow of unmixed bottom water, and give an impression of the finished Eulerean and the freshly started Lagrangean current observation at the southern rim of the Brazil Basin. *Figure 26a shows the position of three hydrographic sections across the Brazil Current between 26°S and 29°S. They run normal to the main topography from less than 200m to more than 2000m depth. In *Figure 26b we display the distribution of potential temperature and salinity in the upper 1000m. The most striking feature is the strong inclination of isotherms near the shelf break. From the isotherms, the core of the current is found between 50m and 500m over the shelf edge. It is most pronounced in the northern section. Also in all three sections a counter current appears on the ocean side of the Brazil Current. Further analysis will show whether this feature is part of a big cyclonic ring. Antarctic Intermediate Water as indicated by a salinity minimum around 900 m to 1000m depth is not fully resolved in these upper ocean sections. The transect back to Rio allowed the investigation of the northward route of Weddell Sea Deep Water, the coldest water crossing the Vema Sill for greater depths of the Brazil Basin (SPEER and ZENK, 1993). The route of this bottom flow is by no means clear from existing charts. Having discovered a deep trough north of the Vema Channel during the first DBE cruise, METEOR occupied a CTD station within this valley before deploying mooring K3 there. Potential temperature profiles (*Fig. 27) show that the coldest water is just 26mK warmer than the coldest water at the sill (-0.131°C compared to -0.157°C). This exciting observation suggests that there must be direct deep connection between the sill (ZENK et al., 1993) and its extension at K3 which is hardly affected by any mixing. We suggest calling this hypothetical connecting trough the Vema Canyon. Next we discuss an example of an Eulerean current observation already read and decoded from data storage units on board. In *Figure 28 we show progressive vector diagrams of mooring BE on the offshore edge of the expected position of the Brazil Current at about 3300m water depth. Early in the record, an energetic event displaces all but the deepest trajectory eastward, while after passage of that feature these currents are steady towards the southwest, i.e. parallel to the local bathymetry. Contrarily, the whole record from the near bottom current meter at 3215 m depth, shows northeasterly direction. The mean temperature recorded by this instrument is 1.7 C which indicates the upper level of Antarctic Bottom Water entering the Brazil Basin from the southwest. Finally we display (*Fig. 29) an early version of the first RAFOS float trajectories from the Antarctic Intermediate Water level. The obtained trajectories are not inconsistent with the large-scale circulation in the subtropical South Atlantic suggested by REID (1989). They all show the westward current component indicative for a recirculation of Intermediate Water from mid ocean regions. Especially the trajectory of float #66 is incompatible with the classical picture of a continuous northward flow of Intermediate Water parallel to the Brazilian continental shelf break (WÜST, 1935). 5.4. MARINE PHYSICS M 22/5 (U. Beckmann, C. Duncombe Rae, W. Erasmi, I. Girod, J. Holfort, U. Koy, P. Meyer, R. Onken, A. Welter, N. Zangenberg) The main objective of the work of the marine physics group was to measure hydrographic parameters by CTD and rosette on every station (see chapter 7.4.1). In order to satisfy the WOCE requirements for high vertical resolution, two successive CTD/rosettes were lowered on stations where the water depth was more than 3500m. By this method, up to 36 water samples were taken on a single station. During the entire leg, currents, sea surface temperature, and sea surface salinity were recorded continuously by the shipborne-ADCP and the thermosalinograph. For better horizontal resolution of temperature measurements, XBT probes were launched mid-way between CTD stations (see chapter 7.4.2) where the distance between stations was greater than 30nm. High resolution XBT sections were conducted in the Brazil and Benguela Currents. On two Brazil Current crossings XBTs were launched at 30 min intervals yielding a resolution between 2 and 3nm. In the Benguela Current XBT drops were done every 10nm. On those stations located in the Brazil or Benguela Current area, an overside-ADCP (see chapter 7.4.6) was used for the first time to give information on the vertical structure of the currents. In order to get a further independent direct current measurement, 15 XCP probes were launched (see chapter 7.4.3). In addition, six surface drifting buoys were launched between 15°W and the Greenwich meridian (see chapter 7.4.5) and one RAFOS float in the Vema Channel (see chapter 7.4.4). Preliminary section plots of potential temperature, salinity, and sigma-T along 30°S are displayed in *Figures 30 - 32. Except to the east of the Greenwich meridian, the main thermocline extends between the surface and 800m. Vertical temperature gradients in this range are 0.02K/m. In the same depth range, the salinity decreases vertically at a rate of 0.002/m. Between 800 and 1200m, temperature gradients are 0.005K/m, whereas the salinity exhibits a minimum value around 900m, and increases again below. This is the core layer of the Antarctic Intermediate Water, the depth of which becomes shallower from west to east by roughly 300m. Below 1200m, the patterns of temperature and salinity look very different in each basin. Between the Rio-Grande Rise and the Mid- Atlantic Ridge, the temperature gradients are very weak (0.0005K/m) between 1200 and 3000m, and a large thermostad can be found between 2000 and 3000m. The salinity, however, increases with depth. A maximum occurs at about 3000m and below the water becomes fresher again. This is the regime of the North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW) and the Circumpolar Deep Water (CDW). Closer to the bottom, both temperature and salinity gradients become stronger caused by the transition from the Deep Water to the Antarctic Bottom Water (AABW). In general, the isotherms are sloping from west to east indicating northward AABW flow. For potential temperatures below 2°C, the temperature and salinity patterns in the Cape Basin are very similar, but in the depth range between 2000 and 3000m, they are very different. This suggests that the histories for the AABW in the Brazil and Cape Basin are similar, but they are different for the deep water. A completely different structure can be seen in the Angola Basin. The bottom water is warmer than in the other basins, there is no water colder than 1.8°C. This is surely due to the fact that the AABW has mixed with the deep water above along its long way from the southern sources through the Argentine and Brazil Basin and the Romanche Fracture Zone. To the west of the Rio Grande Rise, i.e. in the Vema Channel and over the Lower Santos Plateau, the transition between the AABW and the NADW is characterized by strong vertical gradients of temperature and salinity below 3000m. The AABW seems to move northward in two deep western boundary currents leaning against the western shoulder of the Vema Channel and the continental shelf. The closed contours in temperature distribution suggest the NADW deep western boundary current to be located in the depth range between about 1500 and 2500m. During the entire leg no serious organizational or technical problems arose. Only two CTD/rosette casts had to be repeated partially or completely because of a malfunction of the rosette trigger release. Initial stability problems with one salinometer could be solved quickly. At the beginning of the leg, some difficulties arose in receiving the XCP signals, but this problem could be solved by turning the antenna to a vertically polarized direction. The lADCP which was used for the first time by the group worked well. Rotation of the device about the vertical axis was diagnosed on the test station, and was remedied by fixing an Aanderaa vane laterally. Unfortunately the lADCP failed close to the end of the cruise at station no. 96. Obviously water had penetrated into one of the transducers. 5.5 MARINE CHEMISTRY (H. Johannsen, K. Johnson, U. Karbach, A. Korves, L. Mintrop, A. Morak, J. Morlang, B. Schneider) During the cruise no. M 22/5 the chemical oceanography group investigated the oceanic carbonate system and its response to the exchange of CO2 between the atmosphere and the ocean and determined nutrient and oxygen concentrations. In the following an overview of the measurement program and a preliminary evaluation of the data is given. 5.5.1 THE PARTIAL PRESSURE OF CO2 (pCO2) The pCO2 of surface waters was measured continuously with a spatial resolution of about 1 nautical mile over the whole cruise track. For this work the ship's kreiselpump system was utilized to continually pump water from a depth of approximately 5m to an equilibrator onboard connected to an Infrared (IR) analyser for CO2 detection. While on station, the atmospheric CO2 concentration was measured and the IR analyser was calibrated. *Figure 33 shows the distribution of the pCO2 in the surface water as well as the partial pressure of CO2 in the atmosphere along the 30°S parallel. Because large areas in this region have heretofore not been studied or had not been recently studied no comparisons with the M 22 data are given. Especially noteworthy is the strong oversaturation of CO2 across wide stretches of the area of study. 5.5.2 TOTAL CARBON DIOXIDE (TCO2) The analyses of TCO2 were made in cooperation with the Brookhaven National Laboratory. This allowed the deployment of two SOMMA- Coulometer analytical systems so that every second hydrographic station could be completely sampled for CO2. This means that a CO2 measurement was made on every sample which was also analyzed for alkalinity and tracer (freon) concentrations. Despite problems with the analytical systems, probably due to power fluctuations, the determination of TCO2 in reference samples was accurate to ± 2 umol/kg. 5.5.3 ALKALINITY At 28 stations samples from all depths were taken for the potentiometric determination of alkalinity, total carbonate and pH. The titrations were carried out using two systems in parallel. Aim of the investigations was on one hand the determination of the parameter alkalinity for the calculation of the anthropogenic CO2-signal, using coulometer-determined total carbonate values as well as nutrient and oxygen data. On the other hand, the reported discrepancy between potentiometrically obtained TCO2 values and those coming from other analytical methods was to be investigated in detail. This is necessary for the evaluation of the numerous literature data (e.g. GEOSECS) which are older than about five years, as well as to account for possible effects on alkalinity data. The alkalinity profiles obtained show the expected shape. Especially obvious is the strong correlation with salinity. The final calculation of the values, however, was not possible yet on board since, above all, the adjustment of the electrode characteristics for the two different systems requires the recalculation and comparison of all data. The same holds true for the calculation of delta-TCO2, the anthropogenic CO2-signal. 5.5.4 NUTRIENTS AND OXYGEN For all depth sampled, the oxygen and nutrient concentrations were determined. Oxygen was determined by the Winkler method, and the nutrients (nitrite/nitrate, phosphate and silicate) were determined by a continuous-flow method with an auto-analyzer. For the oxygen determination 100ml bottles with wide stoppers were used so that it was possible to perform the Winkler titrations in the sample bottle. This eliminated several manual manipulations required to transfer samples to titration vessels, and as a consequence significantly reduced the sources of errors. To determine the standard deviation, 10 parallel samples from water at different stations with high and low concentrations of O2 were periodically analyzed. The standard deviation was better than 0.4%. In the case of the automated photometric determination of the nutrients, there are fundamental problems especially at low concentrations (surface water) and likewise at high concentrations (deep water). In order to measure high concentrations, the sensitivity of the method may have to be lowered, but this makes it difficult to measure the lower concentrations. For the determination of precision at high concentrations, 24 samples were taken from a depth of 3400 meters and analyzed. The precision for the analyses follows: Silicate 1.3% Phosphate 1.5% Nitrite/Nitrate 1.1% 5.6 BIOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY AND MARINE TAXONOMY (C. Zelck) The zonal transect along 30°S was occupied across the southern-central part of the South Atlantic subtropical gyre. The zoogeography of this region consists of a largely subtropical fauna (PARIN, 1970). Although the first 19 hauls (from the coast of Brazil to 40°W) were a replicate of a section taken by cruise METEOR no. 15 (1991; ANDRES et al., 1992), the other samples provide new information. This survey continues the long-term study of the Atlantic ichthyoplankton (and some invertebrate) conducted by Dr. H.-Ch. JOHN from the taxonomic working group. The plankton at the marine surface (neuston) were taken by the standard method with a neuston sampler, with mesh size (of both the upper and lower nets) of 335mm. A total of 73 catches were taken, in approximately alternating day and night sequence. Stations near the coast were taken closer together than in the central part of the gyre, because of the smaller-scale biological differences at the shelf and continental slope. Catching time was 15 min at a mean towing speed of the catamaran of 2.5 m/s (s = 0.3, N = 61) giving a mean sampled surface of 708 m2 (s = 67, N = 61). The sample condition was in general good. The plankton concentration was small as anticipated, except for two high salt-content samples, as the zonal section runs through a biological minimum area (HENTSCHEL, 1933). All samples were checked macroscopically on board and conspicuous species were noted. All fish larvae and some invertebrate plankton of 31 upper net samples were sorted under a stereomicroscope. Most of the samples came from the western stations. From a total of 365 ichthyoplankton individulals 32 taxa were identified. The hydrographical and biological conditions at the sea surface from Brazil to 40°W are shown in *Figure 34. Maximum temperature and salinity were observed at the coastal stations (A). East of 25°W the temperature rose again to the same level as before. This elevated surface temperature was 1 to 3°C above the mean temperature for January (DHI 1971). The mean ichthyoplankton concentration was 16.2 n/1000 m2 (s = 12.9, N = 31). Night- and dawn/dusk catches showed just slightly greater numbers of fish larvae up to x = 18.6 n/1000 m2 (s = 16.0, N = 15). Day samples yielded only 14.0 n/1000 m2 (s = 7.5, N = 16). The total ichthyoplankton abundance and composition (*Fig. 34b) was almost the same as on METROR cruise no. 15 (ANDRES et al., 1992). Diurnal catch differences are also seen in the species composition. For example Cyclothone larvae and micronektonic nyctoepipelagic Myctophidae (such as Gonichthys barnesi, Hygophum hygomii, Myctophum nitidulum and M. phengodes) were regularly found in the night and dawn/dusk catches, while the flying fishes (such as Exocoetus spp. and Cypselurinae) as well as the Gempylidae are in general photopositive. The zoogeographical classification of the taxa resulted in four different groups, as was observed on METEOR cruise no. 15 (ANDRES, op. cit.). The neritic indicator species of the shelf and continental slope were found at stations closest to the coast (see *Fig. 34c). This group consisted of Mugilidae, Trachurus sp., Balistidae, Coryphaena hippurus, Dactylopterus volitans, Makaira nigricans and a large leptocephalus of over 20cm length. Tropical indicator species (*Fig. 34d) such as M. nitidulum and Oxyporhamphus micropterus became more abundant further offshore, but still within the region of the Brazil Current and Return Current (ZEMBA, 1991). The subtropical ichthyoplankton (E) such as Nanichthys simulans, M. phengodes and H. hygomii slowly replaced the above mentioned western groups and became dominant east of 41°W. Only the subtropical convergence species G. barnesi (after HULLEY, 1981) is present over the section even though in small numbers and frequency (*Fig. 34d with *). Of the invertebrate plankton the Gammaridae genus Synopia (F) and the marine insect Halobates micans (G) was observed. Once again Synopia were frequent and abundant at dawn/dusk and night stations, but it also occurred in warmer saline water (ANDRES, op. cit.). H. micans was only found at temperatures over 22°C, and only west of 6°W. Anthropogenic influences such as tarballs and bits of plastic (occasionally with Bryozoa and Lepas attached to them) were found at almost every station. While the frequency and numbers of tarballs were once again higher in the Brazil Current region (METEOR criuse no. 15), the fishery twine and other types of plastic were more often found in the central part of the section. 5.7 TRACER OCEANOGRAPHY (K. Bulsiewicz, G. Fraas, A. Putzka, J. Weyland) The investigated tracers are Helium, Tritium and the chlorofluorocarbons (CFC) F-11, F-12, F-113 and carbon tetrachloride CCl4. The main part of Tritium, the unstable hydrogen isotope which decays to 3He, and the CFCs are man-made. Their time dependent input at the ocean surface is well known. The tracer concentration is altered by mixing processes and by radioactive decay (in the case of Tritium) while the water descends to deeper levels of the ocean. Measuring the concentration of the tracers delivers information on time scales of transport and mixing processes. The atmospheric F-11 and F-12 contents increased monotonously with different rates since the forties. CCl4 increased since 1920 while F- 113 started in 1970. Hence the concentration ratios of the different tracers vary over a wide range and could be used to indicate the 'age' of water masses (age since leaving the surface). If mixing processes are negligible, 'younger' water is tagged to higher CFC concentration compared with 'older' water. The comparison of concentration- versus ratio-'age' delivers information on mixing processes. Samples were taken according the WOCE scheme as follows: CFCs: glass syringes, 1400 samples, measurements on board. Helium: glass pipets for on board extraction, 340 samples; copper tubes for on shore extraction, 720 samples. Tritium: glass bottles, 700 samples. 14-C-AMS: glass bulbs for the Institut für Umweltpyhsik Heidelberg, 100 samples Helium-, Tritium- and 14C-Samples to be measured on shore. On 78 stations a total of 1400 water samples was analyzed. In addition to former expeditions the device used during this cruise was not only equipped to measure F-11 and F-12, but also F-113 and CCl4. RESULTS: In the following only CFC measurements are shown since these measurements are done on board while the Helium and Tritium measurements are to be measured later on shore. As one result we show the F-11 section *Figure 35 basing on preliminary data. Some of the main characteristics are mentioned below. The isoline for 0.5pmol/kg is found about 500m lower at 1000-1100m compared to the WOCE-WHP A9 19°S section of M 15/3. This is an indication for the Antarctic intermediate water (AIW) which is found much younger on 30°S. The western boundary current of the North Atlantic deep water is only seen as a slight increase of F-11 concentration at 43°W in the range of 2000-2500m. Antarctic Bottom Water is indicated by an F-11 maximum at the bottom. As expected the highest F-11 content is found in the Vema Channel, the main entrance for bottom water to the Brazil Basin. But also in the area of the lower Santos Plateau rather high F-11 values are found. Within the whole deep Brazil Basin between 20-30°W the F-11 concentration is above detection limit. Beyond that there is no F-11 greater than 0.015pmol/kg found in the deep water below 1800m within the Brazil, the Angola and the Cape Basin. 5.8 ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS (J. Brinkmann, M. Krämer, S. Matthias-Maser) 5.8.1 SIZE DISTIBUTION OF MARINE-BORNE AEROSOL PARTICLES - SPECTRAL RECORDING OF THE BIOLOGICAL AND THE WATER SOLUBLE FRACTION, TOTAL AMOUNT OF PARTICULATE CARBON 5.8.1.1 SIZE DISTRIBUTION AND WATER SOLUBLE FRACTION OF ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOL PARTICLES Atmospheric aerosol particles (APs) vary in size over a broad range and differ in their chemical composition. This is dependent on the region where they are found, above towns, the country, or the ocean. The size and the solubility of APs play an important role during the formation of clouds or fog because their ability to adsorb water vapor is closely connected with these properties. Therefore it is necessary to obtain knowledge of these parameters in different regions, also in marine air. The results can be used in numerical models simulating the microphysics of the development of clouds or fog. During the M 22/5 cruise the size distribution of the APs was measured in the range of 0.005 µm up to 50 µm. two optical particle counters and the impactors mentioned below were used for this purpose. Preliminary results show that the marine size distribution used up to now for numerical simulations has to be corrected because there are clearly less particles in the coarse mode than previously assumed. To determine the size fractionated water soluble part of the APs, particles were sampled on filters. These samples could not be evaluated on board. 5.8.1.2 THE BIOLOGICAL FRACTION OF THE ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOL PARTICLES The biological particles are one component of the atmospheric aerosol particles. Among other effects their direct influence on humans is known (they cause allergies and other diseases of the respirator tract). They also play an important role in cloud physics. Pollen is able to accumulate water and decomposition products of vegetation may act as sources for atmospheric ice nuclei (IN). Besides plankton and some fungi, bacteria can work as atmospheric IN and help in forming clouds. Biological APs are ubiquitous and occur in all size classes. One important source for micro-organisms (i.e. bacteria, algae etc.) is the ocean. The "bubble-burst-mechanism" put microbes together with sea salt particles into the atmosphere. Up to now little has been known about the amount of that intake. During cruise M 22/5 impactor measurements were done daily. Particles with r > 10 mm were measured with a so called wing impactor, particles with 0.2 mm < r < 2 mm were collected by a two stage slit impactor. Identification and evaluation of the latter will be done ashore by use of a scanning electron microscope equipped with an energy dispersive X- ray spectrometer. The larger particles were evaluated using a light microscope. The biological particles were marked with a protein dye. Since the dye takes two to three weeks to saturate the particles only the samples from the first half of the cruise could be analyzed on board. It could be seen that the biological fraction of the particles with r > 2 mm was remarkably high: It is about 25%. In comparison, the fraction of biological particles in Mainz/Germany is 30%. In addition, the biologically contaminated particles were evaluated. This fraction is about 10%. Final conclusions will be drawn when the whole analysis will be done. 5.8.1.3 TOTAL AMOUNT OF PARTICULATE CARBON In the atmosphere carbon is present in gaseous as well as in particulate phase. The latter consists of elemental carbon (EC) and organic constituents. As mentioned above biological particles act well as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) whereas freshly generated EC is very hydrophobic. Two mechanisms seem to compensate the poor ability to act as CCN. First, aging improves the hygroscopy; moreover, soot (EC) is a product of combustion both of anthropogenic and natural origin. APs generated in this way have the maximum of their number size spectra at exactly the size suited best for acting as CCN. Furthermore, the concentration of particulate carbon is of interest because of the high absorption of soot and the resulting influence on the radiation balance. The amount of particulate carbon above the ocean, a relatively unpolluted area, is poorly known. On this cruise two sets of filter measurements were obtained. In one case the air was sucked through a nuclepore filter. The absorption of the deposit will be measured and thus the fraction of EC determined. The other filters are "ash-free" membrane filters which will be analyzed by use of pyrolytic methods. This gives the amount of total carbon in the air sampled. Neither analytical determination of carbon could be done on the vessel. First qualitative evaluations (optical estimation of the amount of deposit sampled) show evident variations in filter burden. In some regions the concentration of carbon seems to be much higher than expected before the cruise. 5.8.2 PRECIPITATION ANALYSIS The concentrations of noxious substances in precipitation in anthropogenically influenced regions has increased in recent decades. In comparison to studies concerning the chemical composition of rainwater carried out recently in Mainz/Germany, it is now interesting to investigate rainwater in unpolluted regions. The acidity, electrical conductivity, total concentration and the major ions will be analyzed. With a "wet-only" rainwater sampler, four samples were collected during the M 22/5 cruise. The acidity of the samples is clearly less than in rainwater of anthropogenically polluted areas, whereas the total concentration of soluble mass is higher dues to the dominance of large sea salt particles in marine air. 6 SHIP'S METEOROLOGICAL STATION 6.1 M 22/1 (Dr. Tiesel, W.-T. Ochsenhirt) A strong wide-range low pressure complex dominated all the way from Hamburg to the Iberian peninsula. The weather, therefore, was cool with winds blowing mostly from westerly directions. At Sept. 24, a cold front with 8 Bft from SW crossed RV Meteor in the English Channel followed at Sept. 26 in the Biscaya by a strong low pressure wave (later developed as a hurricane over France) with squalls of with up to 10 Bft. Aftermaths of the hurricane "Charly" controlled the weather on the way of the Meteor along the Portuguese coast. On the way from Portugal to the Canary Islands - between the wide- ranging pressure high of the Azores Islands and the heat lows over NW Africa - friendly, dry and warm weather prevailed with steady trade winds blowing from NE with 6 Bft. From Oct. 4 to Oct. 9 the Meteor crossed the equatorial low pressure zone of the Intertropical Convergence (ITC): within the hot and wet ITC zone bringing about surface water temperatures of 29.5°C and nearly permanent rain the Meteor passed the east side of a low at the Cabo Verde Islands on Oct. 5. Off Liberia a westbound developing low ("easterly wave") with storms and strong squalls controlled the weather for the Meteor at Oct. 8. After passing the Equator at Oct. 10 RV Meteor reached the stable Passat zone of the southern hemisphere with steady SE winds of 6 Bft. Until Oct. 14 dense inversion clowding prevailed along with rain showers. While crossing the equatorial Atlantic from east to west, RV Meteor moved more and more into warm, friendly weather under the influence of the subtropical high of the South Atlantic. 6.2 M 22/2 (R. Tiesel) In the first week, the weather was warm and fair under the influence of the strong south Atlantic subtropical high. Only in the neighborhood of the Brazilian coast strong convection clouds with precipitation could be observed with east to northeast winds exceeding 6Bft. From Oct.31-Nov.2 the southern part of the ITCZ (Intertropical Convergence Zone) was situated between 5°N and 6°N and it was clouded and some precipitation occurred. After leaving the influence of the ITCZ, the weather became fair again with constant southeast trade winds. At and south of the equator, the subtropical high with its center east of Rio de Janeiro provided an almost cloudless sky and southeast trade winds up to 6 Bft. No rainfall occurred till Nov.15, where we arrived in Recife. The air and water temperatures during the cruise varied from 25.0 to 27.5°C. 6.3 M 22/3-5 (E. Röd) On November 18, METEOR left Recife. During most of the time of all 3 legs the subtropical high remained stationary in the eastern part of the South Atlantic. However, with maximum pressure only about 1020hPa this subtropical anticyclone was not very strong. The resulting southeasterly trade winds therefore were very weak and unstable. Most lows of the temperate zone, which moved in a quite northerly track between 35°S and 45°S influenced also the areas north of 30°S with their frontal systems. The first cold front passed METEOR on November 23, (leg 3), south of Recife near 23°S with strong rainfall and gusty winds near Bft 6 average speed. The next low passed the vessel near Santos on December 1; its waving cold front caused rainfall for about 18 hours and very low temperatures near 15°C. A small-ranged, but heavy low developed on December 12, in the frontal zone east of Mar del Plata. It passed METEOR in the evening hours little north with easterly winds Bft 7 to 8, veering south to southwest increasing Bft 10 to 12 during the night hours. The minimum pressure was registrated 982hPa at the weather station onboard and the temperature went down to 15°C, caused by strong cold air convection. Cyclonic activity continued also during the following days; on December 18 a low with minimum pressure near 1000hPa was analyzed east of Rio del Plata. At its preside northerly winds up to Bft 10 were registrated on METEOR next day. Further lows crossed the working area of the research vessel but without extreme weather activity. However, in the time period December 18 to January 8, 1993 more then 10 cold fronts crossed METEOR, causing precipitation at 18 days, sometimes even very heavy rainfall with thunderstorms. Temperatures therefore were below normal with maxima only between 15 and 19°C. During leg 5 weather conditions changed when the vessel left South America with easterly course; the subtropical high took more and more influence with fair conditions. Sometimes a high swell from south, caused by sub-antarctic lows, was noticed onboard with characteristic wave heights near 5m. Approaching South Africa the wind increased slowly from southeasterly directions near Bft. 5 to 6 but without reducing vessel speed. On 31 January METEOR finished its voyage at Cape Town. 7 LISTS 7.1 LEG M22/ 1 7.1.1 LIST OF STATIONS Station GeoB Date Device Time Latitude Longitude Water- Remarks No. No. 1992 bottom depth contact (m) (UTC) Celtic Shelf 462-92 - 25.09. HS/PS 14:15 48°09.0 N 07°00.0 W 171 Test HS/PS -16:42 -48°00.0 N -07°39.0 W 463-92 - 25.09. HS/PS 16:42 48°00.0 N 07°39.0 W 3787 Test HS/PS -26.09. -01:57 -46°45.0 N -08°58.0 W 464-92 1801-1 26.09. KAM 09:23 45°24.3 N 09°32.7 W 4446 Test; to 70m Canary Islands 465-92 1802-1 30.09. P/GFO 07:02 29°09.2 N 15°26.1 W 3638 GFO not successful -01.10 P:1000m 1802-2 SFV(CI1) 08:24 29°06.8 N 15°26.8 W 3603 Recovery of CI1 -11:21 1802-3 SFV(CI2) 12:03 29°07.0 N 15°24.2 W 3604 Deployment of CI2 -15:24 1802-4 KAM 15:42 29°07.1 N 15°24.2 W 3604 Down to 100m 1802-5 30.09. MN 16:25 29°06.9 N 15°23.9 W 3629 b:400-200,200-100,100-40, -01.10 40-20,20-0m; c:250-100, 100-75,75-50,50-25,25-0m 1802-6 KAM 17:08 29°06.7 N 15°24.0 W 3631 Down to 100m 1802-7 P/GFO 20:05 29°10.7 N 15°24.3 W 3651 P:3120m; GFO:3080,2000 empty, 1000,800,400,200m 1802-8 P/GFO 22:25 29°10.5 N 15°24.5 W 3651 P:400m; GFO:100,50,25m 1802-9 KAM 23:08 29°10.5 N 15°24.6 W 3605 Down to 250m 1802-10 MUC/CTD 00:27 29°10.7 N 15°24.0 W 3603 2 large tubes empty Cap Blanc 466-92 1803-1 03.10. P/GFO 06:55 20°35.1 N 20°50.0 W 4015 P:100,400m; GFO:25,50,100, 200,400,800m 1803-2 KAM 07:72 20°35.2 N 20°50.3 W 4013 Down to 10m Cabo Verde Islands 467-92 1804-1 05.10. SFV(CV1) 08:50 11°29.0 N 21°01.0 W 4968 Deployment of CV1 -06.10. -11:50 1804-2 KAM 12:05 11°28.8 N 21°00.6 W 4970 Down to 100m 1804-3 P/GFO 15:29 11°24.5 N 21°00.5 W 4979 P:1050,4520m; GFO:600, 800,1000,1500,3000,4480m 1804-4 MN 18:49 11°24.3 N 20°59.7 W 5084 1000-500,500-300,300-100, 100-50,50-0m 1804-5 MN 19:43 11°24.2 N 20°59.7 W 5005 250-100,100-75,75-50,50-25, 25-0m 1804-6 KAM 20:02 11°24.2 N 20°59.6 W 5008 Down to 50m 1804-7 P/GFO 21:37 11°21.2 N 20°59.8 W 4982 P:100,410m; GFO:25, 50,100,200,300,390m 1804-8 MUC/CTD 24:00 11°21.2 N 20°59.8 W 4982 35cm in all tubes Sierra Leone Basin 468-92 1805-1 07.10. P/GFO/ 08:30 07°50.0 N 16°54.9 W 4680 P:100,400m; GFO:25, CTD 50,100,200,400,600m 1805-2 KAM 09:47 07°50.3 N 16°54.1 W 4676 Down to 100m Guinea Basin 469-92 1806-1 09.10. P/GFO 02:56 03°05.8 N 11°56.7 W 4449 P:900,3930m; GFO:7000, 900,1400,2000,3000,3900m 1806-2 KAM 05:11 03°05.7 N 11°55.5 W 4448 Down to 200m 1806-3 MN 06:01 03°05.7 N 11°55.5 W 4453 1000-500,500-300, 300-100,100-50,50-0m 1806-4 MN 07:11 03°03.3 N 11°53.0 W 4453 250-100,100-75,75-50,50-25, 25-0m 1806-5 SFV(EA6) 07:25 03°03.2 N 11°53.1 W 4450 Recovery of EA6 -11:12 1806-6 P/GFO 12:31 03°02.1 N 11°52.8 W 4497 P:100,350m; GFO:25, 50,100,350,500m 1806-7 KAM 13:41 03°01.7 N 11°52.4 W 4503 Down to 250m 470-92 1807-1 10.10. SFV(EA7) 08:58 00°03.3 S 10°49.3 W 4497 Recovery of EA7 1807-2 P/GFO 13:06 00°00.6 S 10°47.0 W 4613 P:100,400m; GFO:25,50, 100,200,400,600m 1807-3 SFV(EA9) 15:19 00°01.0 S 10°48.4 W 4312 Deployment of EA9 -18:15 1807-4 KAM 18:40 00°00.9 S 10°47.7 W 4665 Down to 200m 1807-5 P/GFO 21:13 00°00.4 S 10°46.7 W 4682 P:1200,4000m; GFO:750,1000,1200,2000, 3000,3900m empty 1807-6 KAM 23:44 00°00.5 S 10°45.8 W 4673 Down to 200m 1807-7 MN 00:27 00°00.7 S 10°45.5 W 4661 1000-500,500-300, 300-100,100-50,50-0m 1807-8 MN 01:11 00°01.0 S 10°44.6 W 4693 250-100,100-75,75-50, 50-25,25-0m 1807-9 P 02:22 00°01.4 S 10°44.4 W 4711 P:700m 471-92 1808-1 12.10. SFV(EA8) 13:11 05°47.1 S 09°25.5 W 3445 Recovery of EA8 -13.10. -15.44 1808-2 P/GFO 17:08 05°47.1 S 09°24.2 W 3421 P:700,3050m; GFO:700,900,1200, 1800,2500,2950m 1808-3 KAM 20:14 05°46.7 S 09°24.1 W 3422 Down to 250m 1808-4 MN 21:03 05°46.7 S 09°24.0 W 3414 1000-500,500-300, 300-100,100-50,50-0m 1808-5 MN 21:53 05°46.6 S 09°23.9 W 3414 250-100,100-75,75-50, 50-25,25-0m 1808-6 P/GFO 23:12 05°48.3 S 09°24.0 W 3379 P:100,400m; GFO:25,50,100, 200,400,500m 1808-7 MUC/CTD 00:44 05°48.0 S 09°24.0 W 3364 6-7cm in 2 large and 3 small tubes 1808-8 KAM 02:00 05°47.7 S 09°24.2 W 3410 Down to 200m Northern Brazil Basin 472-92 1809-1 16.10. P/GFO 19:52 03°59.8 S 25°30.1 W 5533 P:400,5200m; -17.10 GFO:900,1200,2000,3000,4000,5000m 1809-2 MN 22:13 03°59.4 S 25°30.3 W 5530 Down to 250m 1809-3 MN 23:03 03°59.4 S 25°30.5 W 5530 1000-500,500-300 300-100,100-50,50-0m 1809-4 MN 23:32 03°59.6 S 25°30.5 W 5530 400-200,200-100, 100-40,40-20,20-0m 1809-5 KAM 00:04 03°59.5 S 25°30.5 W 5530 250-100,100-75,75-50, 50-25,25-0m 1809-6 P/GFO 01:53 04°00.0 S 25°30.0 W 5530 P:700,1200m; GFO:25, 50,100,150,350,600m 1809-7 KAM 03:47 04°00.2 S 25°30.2 W 5531 Down to 500m 1809-8 P 06:21 04°00.1 S 25°29.3 W 5529 P:2000,3000m; 1809-9 SFV(WA1) 08:18 04°00.0 S 25°34.0 W 5528 Deployment of WA1 -12:27 1809-10 MUC/CTD 15:28 04°03.1 S 25°37.2 W 5517 35-40cm in all tubes 1809-11 P 17:53 04°04.0 S 25°37.4 W 4988 P:100,400m 473-92 1810-1 18.10. P/GFO 20:42 07°30.0 S 28°00.0 W 5579 P:5100,5400m; GFO:1000, -19.10. GFO:1000,1500,2200,1500, 2200,3300,4400,5050m 1810-2 KAM 00:24 07°29.5 S 28°00.0 W 5572 Down to 500m 1801-3 MN 01:29 07°29.4 S 28°00.2 W 5570 1000-500,500-300,300-100, 100-50,50-0m 1810-4 MN 02:21 07°29.4 S 28°00.1 W 5571 400-200,200-100,100-40, 40-20,20-0m 1810-5 MN 02:52 07°29.4 S 28°00.2 W 5571 250-100,100-75,75-50, 50-25,25-0m 1810-6 P 05:34 07°29.0 S 28°00.1 W 5571 P:4400,4800m 1810-7 SFV(WA2) 08:12 07°31.3 S 28°02.5 W 5571 Deployment of WA2 -12:23 1810-8 MUC/CTD 12:06 07°31.3 S 28°04.0 W 5536 All tubes empty 1810-9 KAM 16:01 07°30.7 S 28°03.8 W 5591 Down to 500m 1810-10 P/GFO 18:22 07°31.5 S 28°05.3 W 5558 P:700,2000m; GFO:25,50, 100,200,400m,650m ACRONYMS CTD Probe for Conductivity/ Temperature/ Depth/ Oxygen/ Transparency GFO GoFlo- Bottles HS Hydrosweep KAM In- situ- Camera MN Multi- Net MUC Multi- Corer P In- situ- Pump PS Parasound SFV Mooring with sediment traps ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7.1.2 LIST OF MOORED SEDIMENT TRAPS Mooring Position Water Sampling- Instr. Depth Intervals depth interval (m) (m) Mooring recoveries during M22-1: CI1 29°06.8 N 3605 25.11.91 HDW 1000 20x15.25 days 15°26.8 W 25.9.92 HDW 3078 20x15.25 days STKr7 1023 EA6 03°03.2 N 4453 03.12.91 HDW 901 20x15.25 days 11°53.1 W 06.10.92 HDW 3911 20x15.25 days ST8 924 EA7 00°03.3 S 4255 05.12.91 HDW 949 1x14.4.19x15.4d 10°49.3 W 06.10.92 HDW 4029 1x14.4.19x15.4d ST8 972 EA8 05°47.1 S 3450 15.12.91 HDW 598 1x3.4;19x15.4d 09°25.5 W 06.10.92 HDW 1255 1x3.4;19x15.4d HDW 1833 1x3.4;19x15.4d HDW 2890 1x3.4;19x15.4d ST8 1278 ST5 2913 Mooring deployments during M22-1: CI2 29°07.0 N 3606 1.10.92- HDWn1036 20x9.5 days 15°24.2 W 9.4.93 HDWn3067 20x9.5 days ST7Kr 1059 CV1 11°29.0 N 4968 5.10.92 HDW 1003 20x9.5 days 21°01.0 W 4.4.93 HDW 4523 20x9.5 days ST8 1026 EA9 00°01.0 N 4563 11.10.92 HDW 646 19x9.5 days 10°48.4 W 01.04.93 HDW 1226 19x9.5 days HDW 3786 19x9.5 days ST8 669 WA1 04°00.0 S 5530 17.10.92 HDW 652 20x7.75 days 25°34.0 W 21.03.93 HDW 1232 20x7.75 days HDW 4991 20x7.75 days ST8 675 Mooring deployments during M22-1: WA2 07°31.3 S 5570 19.10.92 HDW 591 20x7.75 days 28°02.5 W 21.03.93 HDW 5031 20x7.75 days ST8 614 Instruments used: HDW =3D Sediment trap Type Howald Electronics (now Hagenuk) HDWn =3D Sediment trap Type Howald Electronics (new version) ST8 =3D current meter Aanderaa, RCM 8 ST5 =3D current meter Aanderaa, RCM 5 STKr =3D current meter with special sensors (Krause, AWI) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7.1.3 CHLOROPHYLL A SAMPLES (MP: membrane pump; RP: rotating pump) No. Date Time Longitude Latitude Water Salin. Temp. Vol Remarks 1992 UTC depth psu °C L 1 29.09. 09:30 14°04.0 W 36°59.0 N 5046 36.52 20.89 1 MP 2 28.09. 14:45 13°04.0 W 36°03.0 N 4812 36.46 21.09 1 MP 3 28.09. 22:45 13°34.0 W 34°37.0 N 4049 36.53 21.61 1 MP 4 29.09. 08:00 14°08.0 W 33.01.0 N 4309 36.58 21.93 1 MP 5 29.09. 15:30 14°35.0 W 31°41.0 N 4329 36.57 22.61 1 MP 6 29.09. 22:30 15°00.0 W 30°25.0 N 3260 36.56 22.75 1 MP 7 30.09. 09:30 15°27.0 W 29°07.0 N 3606 36.55 22.77 1 MP 8 30.09. 21:00 15°24.5 W 29°10.5 N 3603 36.54 22.80 1 MP 9 01.10. 11:00 16°30.0 W 27°31.0 N 3526 36.67 23.02 1 MP 10 01.10. 16:30 17°03.0 W 26°37.9 N 3631 36.59 23.01 1 MP 11 01.10. 22:00 17°37.0 W 25°45.0 N 3397 36.60 23.15 1 MP 12 02.10. 07:15 18°35.4 W 24°12.4 N 2794 36.69 23.43 2 MP 13 02.10. 14:45 19°18.8 W 23°02.3 N 3519 36.22 22.37 2 MP 14 02.10. 23:30 20°12.0 W 21°37.0 N 4043 35.91 23.58 1 MP 15 03.10. 08:15 20°50.0 W 20°33.0 N 3958 35.98 23.30 1 MP 16 03.10. 14:45 20°51.0 W 19°18.0 N 3408 36.07 24.58 1 MP 17 03.10. 23:00 20°53.1 W 17°44.8 N 3161 36.10 25.99 1 MP 18 04.10. 08:00 20°54.9 W 16°07.6 N 3803 35.94 26.70 1 MP 19 04.10. 17:15 20°56.8 W 14°19.7 N 4297 35.51 26.90 1 MP 20 04.10. 22:15 20°58.0 N 13°25.0 N 4538 34.67 28.10 1 MP 21 05.10. 15:00 21°00.0 W 11°24.0 N 4980 35.45 27.80 1 MP 22 05.10. 22:45 21°00.0 W 11°21.0 N 4981 35.38 27.90 1 MP 23 06.10. 10:45 19°41.6 W 10°14.1 N 4649 34.76 28.01 1 MP 24 06.10. 14:45 19°10.8 W 09°47.6 N 4048 34.97 28.50 1 MP 25 07.10. 06:45 17°00.6 W 07°54.9 N 4697 34.64 27.86 2 MP 26 07.10. 15:00 16°13.3 W 07°10.6 N 4686 34.29 27.78 1 MP 27 08.10. 07:30 14°04.6 W 05°08.2 N 4759 34.22 27.04 1 MP 28 08.10. 22:30 12°13.3 W 03°22.4 N 4459 34.77 26.68 1 MP 29 09.10. 08:00 11°53.1 W 03°03.5 N 4453 34.64 26.74 1 MP 30 09.10. 15:05 11°48.0 W 02°48.9 N 4662 34.74 26.92 1 MP 31 09.10. 22:00 11°25.7 W 01°43.2 N 4363 35.71 25.74 1 MP 32 10.10. 08:00 10°51.8 W 00°03.8 N 4397 35.80 24.07 1 MP 33 10.10. 18:00 10°47.8 W 00°00.8 N 4665 35.77 24.07 1 MP 34 10.10. 22:30 10°46.7 W 00°00.3 N 4685 35.85 23.91 1 MP 35 11.10. 08:30 10°30.8 W 00°56.7 S 3833 35.72 23.71 1 MP 36 11.10. 15:00 10°16.5 W 02°00.3 S 3727 35.74 23.94 1 MP 37 11.10. 22:05 09°60.0 W 03°13.9 S 4173 35.77 23.66 1 MP 38 12.10. 08:00 09°37.1 W 04°55.8 S 3803 35.41 22.94 1 MP 39 12.10. 17:00 09°24.3 W 05°47.0 S 3422 35.64 22.70 1 MP 40 12.10. 23:00 09°24.0 W 05°48.2 S 3394 35.60 22.61 1 MP 41 15.10. 09:30 20°00.4 W 04°36.9 S 4789 35.61 23.90 1 RP 42 15.10. 22:00 22°30.7 W 04°20.1 S 4797 35.78 24.61 1 RP 43 16.10. 08.00 24°26.4 W 04°07.0 S 5153 35.65 24.50 1 RP 44 16.10. 15:10 25°30.3 W 03°59.8 S 5530 35.81 24.98 1 RP 45 17.10. 01:00 25°30.1 W 04°00.1 S 5537 35.90 24.78 2 RP 46 18.10. 08:30 27°16.3 W 06°26.9 S 5638 36.06 24.80 2 RP 47 18.10. 15:15 27°59.1 W 07°28.5 S 5577 35.92 24.69 2 RP 48 18.10. 22:15 28°00.3 W 07°29.3 S 5571 35.89 24.51 2 RP 49 19.10. 09:30 28°03.3 W 07°30.8 S 5571 35.87 24.55 2 RP 50 19.10. 15:00 28°05.4 W 07°31.4 S 5557 35.95 24.63 2 RP -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7.1.4 PARTICLE FILTRATION Station Water Date Time Volume Pumping Remarks No. depth 1992 start pumped speed (m) (UTC) L L/h 465-92 (1000) 30.09. 05.55 412 618 Torn at edge 3135 18.00 469 562 400 20.28 304 608 466-92 400 03.10. 06.02 369 553 100 06.12 296 444 467-92 4520 05.10. 12.40 573 573 1000 12.50 526 526 (410) 20.41 375 562 Torn (100) 20.41 474 711 Torn 468-92 100 07.10. 07.42 236 472 400 07.42 298 596 469-92 900 09.10. 01.00 500 500 (3930) 01.00 552 552 Torn 350 11.45 278 556 100 11.45 289 578 470-92 100 10.10. 13.10 262 524 400 13.10 273 546 1200 19.10 552 552 4000 19.10 544 544 200 11.10. 01.23 368 552 700 01.23 374 561 471-92 700 12.10. 16.16 499 499 3050 16.16 560 560 100 22.25 256 512 400 22.25 286 572 472-92 4000 16.10. 14.15 767 511 Started at 3280 m 5200 14.15 766 510 Started at 4580 m 675 22.31 430 430 1175 22.31 581 581 2000 17.10. 02.31 705 528 3000 02.31 632 474 100 15.09 245 367 400 15.09 370 555 473-92 (5400) 18.10. 15.32 810 540 Torn (5100) 15.32 650 433 Torn 4800 19.10. 01.04 770 513 4400 01.04 787 524 Evtl. not tight 2000 14.50 570 570 700 14.50 503 503 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7.2 LEG M 22/ 2 7.2.1 LIST OF STATIONS METEOR 22/ 2 Station List Stat CTD ADCP Peg Peg Day Time Latitude Longitude Water Profile Comment No. Prof. Prof. Stat Prof 1992 UTC lamda phi Depth Depth [m] [db] 474 1 A01 S07 1 24.10. 04:34 5°34.1'S 34°36.2'W 3339 3422 475 2 A02 S06 2 24.10. 10:44 5°37.9'S 34°54.3'W 1378 1204 476 3 A03 27.10. 00:15 0°08.9'N 44°22.8'W 1125 1067 477 4 A04 27.10. 02:53 0°23.0'N 44°15.8'W 3278 3283 478 - 27.10. 14:00 0°14.6'N 44°17.9'W 2880 - K-359 479 5 A05 27.10. 23:13 0°36.5'N 44°10.9'W 3629 3663 K-360 480 6 A06 N27 3 28.10. 04:59 0°17.6'N 44°20.8'W 3058 3048 481 7 A07 28.10. 18:17 1°10.0'N 44°03.6'W 4098 4148 K-361 482 8 A08 29.10. 00:06 1°35.5'N 44°00.1'W 4110 4145 483 9 A09 N03 4 29.10. 05:56 1°58.0'N 44°01.4'W 4130 4174 484 10 A10 29.10. 13:52 2°30.3'N 44°01.6'W 4166 4212 485 11 A11 N04 5 29.10. 21:46 3°18.2'N 43°59.9'W 4200 4250 486 12 A12 30.10. 04:31 3°46.3'N 44°02.1'W 4210 4258 487 13 A13 N26 6 30.10. 10:25 4°13.8'N 44°01.9'W 4170 4220 488 14 A14 30.10. 18:04 4°50.9'N 44°01.5'W 3341 3410 489 15 A15 31.10. 01:10 5°42.4'N 44°00.9'W 4030 4073 490 16 A16 31.10. 06:37 6°04.6'N 44°00.3'W 4148 4262 491 17 A17 N6 7 31.16. 13:48 6°39.1'N 44°00.3'W 4634 4700 492 18 A18 02.11. 20:01 4°00.2'N 35°01.6'W 3511 2515 493 19 A19 03.11. 03:20 3°10.3'N 35°01.8'W 3520 2505 494 20 A20 03.11. 10:43 2°20.1'N 35°01.8'W 4142 2513 495 21 A21 03.11. 18:03 1°30.3'N 35°02.0'W 4034 2501 496 22 A22 S10 8 04.11. 02:07 0°38.9'N 34°59.5'W 4528 4584 497 23 A23 9 04.11. 10:27 0°01.6'S 34°59.5'W 4420 4580 498 24 B24 S2 10 04.11. 19:13 0°46.8'S 34°59.5'W 4441 4455 BBADCP 499 25 A25 05.11. 00:51 1°03.7'S 34°59.4'W 4376 4426 500 26 A26 05.11. 05:24 1°16.0'S 34°59.7'W 4349 4700 501 27 A27 S3 11 05.11. 09:41 1°28.3'S 34°59.7'W 4280 4321 502 28 A28 05.11. 15:28 1°44.4'S 34°59.4'W 4100 4139 503 29 A29 S4 12 05.11. 21:45 2°16.6'S 34°59.4'W 3967 4005 504 30 A30 S5 13 06.11. 06:50 3°09.4'S 34°52.7'W 3809 3850 505 31 A31 06.11. 12:48 3°29.4'S 35°13.7'W 3451 3474 506 32 B32 S14 14 06.11. 23:25 3°58.7'S 34°56.9'W 3525 3545 BBADCP 507 33 A33 07.11. 04:44 4°19.2'S 35°02.3'W 3385 3416 508 34 A34 S15 15 07.11. 12:58 4°29.8'S 35°04.9'W 3160 3162 509 35 A35 07.11. 18:38 4°55.4'S 34°53.1'W 877 877 510 36 A36 07.11. 20:41 5°01.4'S 35°00.0'W 539 532 511 37 A37 08.11. 01:16 5°37.0'S 34°56.9'W 505 497 512 38 B38 S6 16 08.11. 02:46 5°37.7'S 34°54.5'W 1249 1142 BBADCP 512 382 A38 08.11. 04:24 5°38.1'S 34°54.2'W - 251 513 39 A39 08.11. 08:12 5°35.4'S 34°47.2'W 2685 2665 514 40 A40 S7 17 08.11. 11:57 5°33.8'S 34°36.2'W 3435 3448 515 41 A41 S12 18 08.11. 17:18 5°32.7'S 34°19.9'W 3948 3977 516 42 A42 S8 19 08.11. 23:20 5°31.6'S 34°00.9'W 4204 4214 517 43 09.11. 05:50 5°29.6'S 33°38.6'W 4396 4449 518 44 S13 20 09.11. 12:16 5°25.4'S 33°10.5'W 4524 4581 519 45 A45 09.11. 17:40 5°20.1'S 32°59.6'W 4547 4607 BBADCP 520 46 B46 S9 21 10.11. 00:15 5°20.0'S 32°27.4'W 4610 4672 BBADCP 521 47 B47 S16 22 10.11. 09:51 5°14.7'S 31°59.2'W 4661 4726 BBADCP 522 48 B48 S17 23 10.11. 19:48 5°09.7'S 31°29.4'W 4722 4785 BBADCP 523 49 B49 11.11. 03:20 5°07.7'S 30°59.2'W 4874 4952 BBADCP 524 50 B50 11.11. 10:10 5°03.3'S 30°29.3'W 4970 5054 BBADCP 525 51 B51 11.11. 16:58 4°59.6'S 29°59.6'W 4985 5061 BBADCP 526 52 B52 12.11. 02:04 5°59.6'S 30°34.7'W 5132 1500 BBADCP 527 53 B53 12.11. 08:19 6°59.8'S 31°04.8'W 5168 1504 BBADCP 528 54 B54 12.11. 16:22 8°00.0'S 31°29.8'W 5231 1501 BBADCP 529 55 B55 12.11. 23:34 8°59.9'S 31°59.8'W 5028 1500 BBADCP 530 56 B56 13.11. 07:46 9°59.7'S 32°29.6'W 4922 4999 BBADCP 531 57 B57 13.11. 14:54 9°59.2'S 33°09.9'W 4821 4893 BBADCP 532 58 B58 13.11. 22:22 9°59.7'S 33°50.2'W 4681 4749 BBADCP 533 59 B59 14.11. 04:08 9°59.6'S 34°15.4'W 4197 4317 BBADCP 534 60 B60 14.11. 08:25 9°59.6'S 34°30.1'W 3223 3232 BBADCP 535 61 B61 14.11. 12:37 9°59.3'S 34°44.6'W 3774 3801 BBADCP 536 62 B62 14.11. 16:50 9°59.6'S 35°04.9'W 3379 3396 BBADCP 537 63 B63 14.11. 20:21 9°59.2'S 35°14.3'W 2325 2325 BBADCP 538 64 B64 14.11. 23:21 9°59.1'S 35°24.5'W 1552 1552 BBADCP 539 65 B65 15.11. 01.31 9°59.0'S 35°29.7'W 1049 1060 BBADCP TM22/ 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7.2.2 LIST OF XBT DROPS METEOR 22-2 XBT Stations XBT Stat Day Start Latitude Longitude Water XBT Comment Time Depth Depth 001 --- 23.10.92 20:04 34°39.1'W 06°52.9'S 30m 760m test 002 --- 24.10.92 00:51 34°37.2'W 05°58.1'S 2158m 760m 003 --- 24.10.92 02:12 34°36.3'W 05°41.8'S 3324m 300m 004 --- 24.10.92 18:41 35°33.6'W 04°35.1'S 2210m 760m 005 --- 24.10.92 20:04 35°48.5'W 04°27.3'S 2584m 760m 006 --- 24.10.92 23:23 36°25.9'W 04°07.4'S 2549m 760m 007 --- 25.10.92 01:16 36°47.5'W 03°56.1'S 2532m 760m 008 --- 25.10.92 06:07 37°41.8'W 03°27.0'S 1595m 760m 009 --- 25.10.92 10:05 38°29.0'W 03°02.8'S 1385m 760m 010 --- 25.10.92 11:04 38°40.7'W 02°56.8'S 1495m 760m 011 --- 25.10.92 12:02 38°52.2'W 02°50.3'S 983m 760m 012 --- 25.10.92 13:01 39°03.8'W 02°44.2'S 200m 214m shallow water 013 --- 25.10.92 23:29 41°04.5'W 02°02.3'S 1080m 760m 014 --- 26.10.92 02:04 41°36.1'W 01°52.5'S 2393m 760m 015 --- 26.10.92 04:01 42°01.0'W 01°44.7'S 2589m 760m 016 --- 26.10.92 06:06 42°26.0'W 01°36.8'S 2550m 760m 017 --- 26.10.92 08:14 42°48.9'W 01°28.6'S 2379m 760m 018 --- 26.10.92 08:19 42°53.2'W 01°28.1'S 2270m 760m 019 --- 26.10.92 08:24 42°54.4'W 01°27.7'S 2270m 760m 020 --- 26.10.92 10:08 43°14.3'W 01°21.5'S 883m 760m 021 --- 27.10.92 15:54 44°15.8'W 00°21.8'N 3252m 760m 022 --- 27.10.92 16:27 44°14.6'W 00°27.0'N 3370m 760m 023 --- 27.10.92 17:08 44°11.5'W 00°33.0'N 3548m 480m 024 --- 27.10.92 20:22 44°03.8'W 01°11.0'N 4095m 760m 025 --- 28.10.92 21:30 44°02.2'W 01°23.2'N 4100m 710m 026 482 29.10.92 02:20 44°00.7'W 01°36.1'N 4105m 760m 027 --- 29.10.92 03:32 44°01.1'W 01°49.7'N 4124m 760m 028 --- 29.10.92 09:24 44°03.3'W 01°57.8'N 4124m 760m 029 484 29.10.92 11:17 44°02.2'W 02°17.3'N 4153m 620m 2 trials 030 485 29.10.92 16:00 44°01.5'W 02°31.0'N 4168m 760m 031 --- 29.10.92 17:12 44°01.9'W 02°45.9'N 4185m 600m 032 --- 29.10.92 18:34 44°02.0'W 03°02.0'N 4195m 760m 033 --- 30.10.92 00:45 44°00.1'W 03°18.0'N 4199m 760m 034 --- 30.10.92 01:59 44°01.9'W 03°33.0'N 4212m 760m 035 486 30.10.92 06:40 44°01.7'W 03°48.4'N 4213m 760m 036 --- 30.10.92 08:06 44°02.4'W 04°05.3'N 4207m 760m 037 487 30.10.92 13:23 44°02.5'W 04°13.5'N 4177m 760m 038 --- 30.10.92 14:46 44°00.2'W 04°30.1'N 3382m 760m 039 --- 30.10.92 16:07 44°02.1'W 04°45.3'N 3395m 760m 040 488 30.10.92 19:39 44°00.6'W 04°53.3'N 3323m 760m 041 --- 30.10.92 23:02 44°01.6'W 05°34.0'N 3781m 760m 042 489 31.10.92 03:28 44°00.3'W 05°44.9'N 4088m 760m 043 --- 31.10.92 04:45 44°01.8'W 06°00.2'N 4105m 760m 044 --- 31.10.92 10:15 43°59.4'W 06°20.5'N 4507m 710m 045 --- 31.10.92 11:06 43°59.5'W 06°31.0'N 4637m 125m 046 --- 31.10.92 17:21 43°58.5'W 06°39.8'N 4635m 760m 047 --- 31.10.92 18:14 43°48.9'W 06°36.9'N 4617m 700m 048 --- 31.10.92 19:01 43°40.4'W 06°34.7'N 4686m 760m 049 --- 31.10.92 20:01 43°29.8'W 06°31.1'N 4520m 760m 050 --- 31.10.92 20:57 43°19.5'W 06°28.0'N 4533m 760m 051 --- 31.10.92 21:57 43°08.4'W 06°24.8'N 4555m 760m 052 --- 31.10.92 22:58 42°57.0'W 06°22.0'N 4676m 760m 053 --- 31.10.92 23:59 42°42.2'W 06°18.5'N 4598m 760m 054 --- 01.11.92 00:55 42°36.0'W 06°15.5'N 4678m 760m 055 --- 01.11.92 01:58 42°25.0'W 06°12.2'N 4687m 760m 056 --- 01.11.92 03:03 42°13.4'W 06°08.9'N 4688m 760m 057 --- 01.11.92 04:02 42°03.0'W 06°05.9'N 4685m 760m 058 --- 01.11.92 05:04 41°51.6'W 06°02.3'N 4684m 760m 059 --- 01.11.92 06:03 41°40.8'W 05°59.2'N 4684m 760m 060 --- 01.11.92 06:59 41°31.0'W 05°56.3'N 4675m 760m 061 --- 01.11.92 07:59 41°19.0'W 05°52.8'N 4683m 760m 062 --- 01.11.92 09:01 41°07.5'W 05°49.4'N 4652m 760m 063 --- 01.11.92 10:01 40°56.8'W 05°45.8'N 4676m 760m 064 --- 01.11.92 10:57 40°46.5'W 05°43.1'N 4674m 760m 065 --- 01.11.92 11:58 40°36.4'W 05°38.2'N 4678m 760m 066 --- 01.11.92 13:15 40°21.8'W 05°34.2'N 4742m 760m 067 --- 01.11.92 13:57 40°13.7'W 05°31.8'N 4513m 760m 068 --- 01.11.92 15:04 40°01.0'W 05°27.9'N 4650m 760m 069 --- 01.11.92 16:02 39°50.5'W 05°25.3'N 4290m 760m 070 --- 01.11.92 17:01 39°38.7'W 05°22.3'N 4581m 760m 071 --- 01.11.92 17:56 39°28.3'W 05°19.6'N 4651m 0m corrupted data 072 --- 01.11.92 19:14 39°13.3'W 05°15.4'N 4656m 760m 073 --- 01.11.92 20:00 39°04.6'W 05°12.8'N 4517m 760m 074 --- 01.11.92 21:10 38°50.9'W 05°10.1'N 4506m 760m 075 --- 01.11.92 21:58 38°40.8'W 05°06.1'N 4682m 760m 076 --- 01.11.92 22:56 38°30.5'W 05°02.6'N 4671m 760m 077 --- 01.11.92 23:56 38°19.3'W 04°59.3'N 4513m 760m 078 --- 02.11.92 00:55 38°08.1'W 04°56.0'N 4256m 640m 079 --- 02.11.92 01:54 37°57.0'W 04°52.6'N 4538m 760m 080 --- 02.11.92 03:05 37°43.3'W 04°48.8'N 4571m 680m 081 --- 02.11.92 04:01 37°32.7'W 04°45.6'N 4437m 760m 082 --- 02.11.92 05:08 37°20.0'W 04°41.8'N 4617m 760m 083 --- 02.11.92 06:01 37°10.0'W 04°38.8'N 4231m 760m 084 --- 02.11.92 06:57 37°00.0'W 04°35.7'N 4050m 760m 085 --- 02.11.92 07:59 36°48.9'W 04°32.4'N 4038m 700m 086 --- 02.11.92 08:59 36°38.4'W 04°29.3'N 3960m 760m 087 --- 02.11.92 10:00 36°27.5'W 04°25.8'N 4351m 760m 088 --- 02.11.92 10:56 36°18.0'W 04°23.3'N 4160m 720m 089 --- 02.11.92 11:55 36°08.5'W 04°20.4'N 4151m 760m 090 --- 02.11.92 12:55 35°59.2'W 04°17.6'N 3942m 760m 091 --- 02.11.92 13:54 35°50.0'W 04°14.8'N 3818m 760m 092 --- 02.11.92 15:03 35°39.1'W 04°11.7'N 3561m 760m 093 --- 02.11.92 15:59 35°30.3'W 04°09.0'N 3786m 760m 094 --- 02.11.92 17:10 35°19.8'W 04°06.0'N 3819m 760m 095 --- 02.11.92 18:02 35°11.9'W 04°03.6'N 3445m 760m 096 --- 02.11.92 21:19 35°01.4'W 04°00.1'N 3510m 760m 097 --- 02.11.92 23:18 35°02.0'W 04°00.0'N 3692m 760m 098 --- 03.11.92 01:19 35°01.9'W 03°20.0'N 3586m 760m 099 --- 03.11.92 05:37 35°02.0'W 03°00.0'N 3638m 720m 100 --- 03.11.92 07:42 35°01.7'W 02°40.0'N 3657m 760m 101 --- 03.11.92 12:01 35°01.8'W 02°20.1'N 4162m 760m 102 --- 03.11.92 14:09 35°01.9'W 02°00.0'N 4211m 760m 103 --- 03.11.92 16:07 35°02.0'W 01°40.0'N 4010m 760m 104 --- 03.11.92 20:09 35°01.8'W 01°20.7'N 4030m 760m 105 --- 03.11.92 22:09 35°00.8'W 01°00.0'N 3581m 760m 106 --- 03.11.92 23:36 35°00.2'W 00°45.0'N 4522m 760m 107 --- 04.11.92 05:37 34°59.9'W 00°30.0'N 4525m 760m 108 --- 04.11.92 07:02 34°59.8'W 00°15.0'N 4523m 760m 109 --- 04.11.92 08:38 34°59.7'W 00°00.0'N 4521m 760m 110 --- 04.11.92 13:13 35°00.3'W 00°03.2'S 4465m 760m 111 --- 04.11.92 14:56 34°59.8'W 00°20.8'S 4493m 760m 112 --- 04.11.92 16:44 35°00.3'W 00°40.0'S 4448m 760m 113 --- 04.11.92 23:01 34°59.9'W 01°06.0'S 4367m 760m 114 --- 05.11.92 07:17 34°59.8'W 01°20.0'S 4031m 760m 115 --- 05.11.92 13:18 35°00.1'W 01°40.0'S 4064m 760m 116 501 05.11.92 18:33 35°00.1'W 02°00.0'S 4561m 760m 117 --- 06.11.92 01:24 34°58.2'W 02°30.0'S 760m no depth 118 --- 06.11.92 04:14 34°54.3'W 03°00.0'S 3830m 760m 119 505 06.11.92 14:35 35°13.2'W 03°30.3'S 3444m 760m 120 506 07.11.92 01:30 34°57.9'W 03°59.6'S 3516m 760m 121 --- 07.11.92 06:59 35°02.1'W 04°29.0'S 3159m 760m 122 --- 07.11.92 16:46 34°58.6'W 04°45.0'S 916m 760m 123 --- 07.11.92 21:33 34°59.6'W 05°03.7'S 540m 760m 124 --- 08.11.92 06:11 34°54.5'W 05°37.3'S 891m 760m 125 --- 08.11.92 10:12 34°40.0'W 05°34.8'S 3142m 760m 126 --- 08.11.92 19:45 34°20.3'W 05°33.4'S 3915m 760m 127 516 09.11.92 01:59 34°01.3'W 05°33.0'S 4164m 760m 128 --- 09.11.92 03:37 33°45.0'W 05°30.7'S 4349m 760m 129 --- 09.11.92 08:34 33°30.0'W 05°27.8'S 4450m 760m 130 518 09.11.92 14:52 33°10.6'W 05°25.4'S 4523m 760m 131 519 09.11.92 19:24 32°58.4'W 05°19.8'S 4548m 760m 132 520 10.11.92 03:11 32°27.5'W 05°20.7'S 4611m 760m 133 --- 10.11.92 04:25 32°15.0'W 05°18.1'S 4545m 760m 134 521 10.11.92 12:43 32°00.0'W 05°15.3'S 4623m 760m 135 --- 10.11.92 14:35 31°41.3'W 05°12.6'S 4646m 760m 136 --- 10.11.92 22:40 31°29.2'W 05°09.8'S 4726m 760m 137 --- 10.11.92 00:04 31°15.0'W 05°09.1'S 4842m 760m 138 523 11.11.92 05:36 30°58.1'W 05°07.0'S 4872m 760m 139 --- 11.11.92 06:48 30°45.9'W 05°06.2'S 4918m 760m 140 525 11.11.92 12:14 30°28.4'W 05°03.2'S 4921m 760m 141 --- 11.11.92 13:56 30°11.2'W 05°01.4'S 4946m 760m 142 --- 11.11.92 19:24 29°59.9'W 05°00.5'S 4980m 760m 143 --- 11.11.92 20:24 30°06.3'W 05°10.0'S 5010m 760m 144 --- 11.11.92 21:21 30°11.6'W 05°20.0'S 5030m 760m 145 --- 11.11.92 22:19 30°17.3'W 05°30.0'S 5065m 760m 146 --- 11.11.92 23:23 30°23.3'W 05°40.0'S 5089m 760m 147 --- 12.11.92 00:22 30°29.1'W 05°50.0'S 5114m 760m 148 526 12.11.92 02:46 30°34.8'W 06°00.0'S 5135m 760m 149 --- 12.11.92 03:43 30°40.0'W 06°10.0'S 5140m 760m 150 --- 12.11.92 04:42 30°44.9'W 06°19.9'S 5040m 760m 151 --- 12.11.92 05:42 30°49.8'W 06°29.9'S 5160m 760m 152 --- 12.11.92 06:42 30°54.9'W 40°00.0'S 5167m 760m 153 --- 12.11.92 07:51 31°00.0'W 06°51.0'S 5180m 760m 154 --- 12.11.92 09:55 31°04.9'W 07°00.1'S 5170m 760m 155 --- 12.11.92 11:00 31°09.5'W 07°10.9'S 5221m 760m 156 --- 12.11.92 11:50 31°13.2'W 07°20.0'S 5225m 760m 157 --- 12.11.92 12:49 31°17.4'W 07°30.0'S 5256m 760m 158 --- 12.11.92 13:51 31°21.5'W 07°40.0'S 5225m 760m 159 --- 12.11.92 14:46 31°25.7'W 07°50.0'S 5228m 760m 160 528 12.11.92 17:04 31°30.1'W 08°00.9'S 5227m 760m 161 --- 12.11.92 17:59 31°34.5'W 08°10.0'S 5196m 760m 162 --- 12.11.92 18:57 31°39.9'W 08°20.0'S 5198m 760m 163 --- 12.11.92 19:55 31°44.9'W 08°30.0'S 5075m 760m 164 --- 12.11.92 20:56 31°49.6'W 08°40.0'S 2935m 760m 165 --- 13.11.92 00:11 31°59.7'W 08°59.8'S 5022m 760m 166 --- 13.11.92 01:12 32°05.1'W 09°10.4'S 4997m 760m 167 --- 13.11.92 02:04 32°09.8'W 09°20.0'S 4982m 760m 168 --- 13.11.92 03:01 32°14.6'W 09°30.0'S 4963m 760m 169 --- 13.11.92 04:00 32°20.0'W 09°40.0'S 4949m 760m 170 --- 13.11.92 04:56 32°25.0'W 09°50.0'S 4928m 760m 171 --- 13.11.92 09:48 32°30.0'W 10°00.0'S 4920m 760m 172 --- 13.11.92 10:52 32°42.8'W 10°00.0'S 4896m 760m 173 --- 13.11.92 11:33 32°50.8'W 09°60.0'S 4872m 760m 174 --- 13.11.92 12:19 32°50.0'W 10°00.0'S 4850m 760m 175 531 13.11.92 17:11 33°10.0'W 09°58.6'S 4818m 760m 176 --- 13.11.92 18:00 33°20.0'W 09°59.2'S 4798m 760m 177 --- 13.11.92 18:52 33°29.9'W 10°00.0'S 4755m 760m 178 --- 13.11.92 19:45 33°40.0'W 10°00.0'S 4717m 760m 179 532 14.11.92 00:20 33°50.9'W 09°59.1'S 4680m 760m 180 --- 14.11.92 01:08 33°60.0'W 09°59.7'S 4674m 760m 181 --- 14.11.92 01:59 34°10.0'W 10°00.1'S 4638m 760m 182 --- 14.11.92 06:14 34°20.0'W 09°59.6'S 4053m 760m 183 --- 14.11.92 10:00 34°30.0'W 10°00.0'S 2926m 760m 184 --- 14.11.92 10:48 34°40.0'W 09°59.7'S 3855m 760m 185 535 14.11.92 14:22 34°50.1'W 09°59.4'S 3703m 760m 186 --- 14.11.92 15:11 35°00.0'W 10°00.0'S 3485m 760m 187 --- 14.11.92 18:49 35°10.0'W 09°59.5'S 2389m 760m 188 --- 14.11.92 22:06 35°20.0'W 09°59.6'S 1960m 760m 189 --- 14.11.92 23:55 35°24.1'W 09°58.5'S 1439m 760m 190 --- 15.11.92 02:02 35°28.7'W 09°57.2'S 963m 760m 2 trials -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7.3 LEG M 22/3-4 7.3.1 CTD STATIONS Stat./ Date Time Latitude Longitude Depth Profile 1992 UTC (m) 540/1 11/20 10:15 13°57.4 S 36°16.6 W 4343 542/2 11/22 14:50 19°39.86 S 39°11.14 W 920 543/3 11/22 23:58 21°09.98 S 38°46.78 W 2623 544/4 11/23 9:06 22°09.88 S 37°52.00 W 3523 545/5 11/24 20:23 26°27.10 S 42°02.06 W 2587 547/6 11/25 20:27 28°50.15 S 44°25.66 W 3697 548/7 11/26 2:18 28°20.11 S 44°50.23 W 3445 549/8 11/26 8:57 28°15.20 S 45°13.94 W 3208 551/9 11/26 16:10 28°10.07 S 45°27.92 W 2857 552/10 11/26 19:49 28°05.99 S 45°45.04 W 2754 553/11 11/26 23:03 28°03.09 S 46°04.06 W 2461 554/12 11/27 1:42 28°01.18 S 46°16.08 W 2305 555/13 11/27 4:29 27°57.97 S 46°25.76 W 1901 556/14 11/27 7:07 27°54.92 S 46°37.05 W 1354 559/15 11/27 19:41 27°50.02 S 46°53.03 W 700 560/16 11/27 22:10 27°47.12 S 47°05.22 W 494 561/17 11/28 0:13 27°43.06 S 47°17.97 W 221 562/18 11/28 2:33 27°39.75 S 47°30.02 W 142 563/19 11/28 8:21 26°55.06 S 46°59.90 W 155 564/20 11/28 12:02 26°55.06 S 46°25.08 W 442 565/21 11/28 15:30 27°06.95 S 45°56.94 W 1805 566/22 11/28 19:21 27°15.07 S 45°34.24 W 2231 567/23 11/28 23:44 27°26.88 S 45°07.00 W 2599 568/24 11/29 5:46 26°54.96 S 44°34.99 W 2682 569/25 11/29 9:50 26°40.11 S 44°53.15 W 2499 570/26 11/29 13:31 26°29.11 S 45°09.72 W 2130 571/27 11/29 16:42 26°18.96 S 45°25.09 W 1646 572/28 11/29 19:58 26°05.85 S 45°40.60 W 491 573/29 11/29 21:49 25°58.02 S 45°52.97 W 328 574/30 11/29 23:48 25°46.99 S 46°05.09 W 157 575/31 12/3 21:25 28°27.11 S 44°27.47 W 3620 576/32 12/4 5:46 28°59.82 S 43°34.00 W 3919 577/33 12/4 20:13 29°31.07 S 42°42.23 W 4013 578/34 12/5 2:10 29°48.06 S 42°12.05 W 4022 579/35 12/5 7:17 30°01.83 S 41°49.35 W 3913 580/36 12/5 21:11 30°34.79 S 40°46.10 W 3727 581/37 12/6 2:47 30°53.05 S 40°21.57 W 4033 582/38 12/6 8:34 31°10.82 S 39°50.90 W 3796 586/39 12/7 0:11 31°11.80 S 39°31.66 W 4354 587/40 12/7 3:15 31°12.07 S 39°28.25 W 4166 588/41 12/7 6:10 31°11.92 S 39°26.39 W 4561 589/42 12/7 9:24 31°12.27 S 39°24.68 W 4601 594/43 12/8 2:30 31°12.27 S 39°20.99 W 4567 596/44 12/8 17:03 31°11.86 S 39°16.34 W 4063 601/45 12/10 23:25 33°51.61 S 30°54.41 W 5147 603/46 12/11 23:51 34°18.18 S 28°29.96 W 4031 607/47 12/15 0:38 34°36.33 S 27°02.96 W 4301 608/48 12/15 6:14 34°29.97 S 27°18.27 W 4319 609/49 12/15 19:20 34°31.54 S 26°59.39 W 4326 612/50 12/16 20:59 31°37.84 S 28°47.37 W 3806 613/51 12/17 13:02 30°10.18 S 31°15.70 W 4067 615/52 12/18 13:45 27°23.42 S 34°13.60 W 4201 616/53 12/19 0:33 26°53.20 S 34°47.53 W 4762 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7.3.2 LIST OF XBT DROPS Profile Date Time Latitude Longitude Depth No. 1992 UTC (m) 1 11/22 13:38 19°39.80 S 39°11.50 W 2 11/22 14:57 19°43.30 S 39°10.20 W 1227 3 11/22 14:32 19°49.10 S 39°08.40 W 1629 4 11/22 15:00 19°54.70 S 39°07.10 W 1654 5 11/22 15:29 20°01.00 S 39°05.50 W 1922 6 11/22 15:56 20°06.00 S 39°04.00 W 1922 7 11/22 16:28 20°12.20 S 39°02.40 W 1963 8 11/22 14:58 20°17.80 S 39°00.90 W 2129 9 11/22 17:28 20°23.70 S 38°59.30 W 2262 10 11/22 17:54 20°28.60 S 38°58.00 W 2300 11 11/22 18:25 20°34.60 S 38°56.40 W 2440 12 11/22 18:56 20°40.40 S 38°54.70 W 2476 13 11/22 19:34 20°47.30 S 38°54.00 W 2525 14 11/22 19:58 20°51.80 S 38°52.40 W 2481 15 11/22 20:27 20°57.10 S 38°51.20 W 2645 16 11/22 21:04 21°02.40 S 38°49.30 W 2581 17 11/22 21:28 21°07.80 S 38°47.50 W 2568 18 11/22 23:38 21°10.00 S 38°47.60 W 19 11/22 23:59 21°12.70 S 38°44.80 W 20 11/23 0:29 21°16.80 S 38°40.70 W 21 11/23 0:57 21°20.80 S 38°37.00 W 22 11/23 1:24 21°24.70 S 38°33.50 W 23 11/23 1:57 21°28.60 S 38°29.80 W 24 11/23 2:27 21°33.40 S 38°25.50 W 3434 25 11/23 3:05 21°38.70 S 38°20.70 W 3477 26 11/23 3:31 21°42.30 S 38°17.40 W 3511 27 11/23 3:58 21°45.90 S 38°14.20 W 3523 28 11/23 4:26 21°50.30 S 38°10.30 W 3509 29 11/23 4:56 21°54.40 S 38°06.50 W 3515 30 11/23 5:29 21°58.80 S 38°02.30 W 3509 31 11/23 5:59 22°02.80 S 37°58.70 W 3526 32 11/23 6:29 22°07.40 S 37°54.40 W 3533 33 11/23 10:59 22°22.00 S 38°03.40 W 3439 34 11/23 12:59 22°38.80 S 38°19.50 W 35 11/23 15:00 22°55.70 S 38°35.90 W 3128 36 11/23 16:57 23°11.60 S 38°51.30 W 3229 37 11/23 18:57 23°27.70 S 39°06.50 W 3062 38 11/23 20:58 23°43.50 S 39°22.00 W 3358 39 11/23 22:59 23°58.60 S 39°36.60 W 3128 40 11/24 1:06 24°14.50 S 39°51.90 W 3075 41 11/24 3:37 24°35.80 S 40°12.80 W 3038 42 11/24 4:55 24°46.10 S 40°22.70 W 2970 43 11/24 6:57 25°02.00 S 40°38.30 W 3080 44 11/24 8:58 25°17.60 S 40°53.50 W 2684 45 11/24 11:09 25°34.20 S 41°10.40 W 2596 46 11/24 12:57 25°47.80 S 41°23.20 W 2760 47 11/24 14:57 26°02.50 S 41°37.70 W 2689 48 11/24 16:58 26°17.50 S 41°52.60 W 2505 49 11/24 20:58 26°37.40 S 42°12.30 W 2542 50 11/24 22:56 26°53.10 S 42°27.80 W 2440 51 11/25 0:56 27°08.90 S 42°43.60 W 2373 52 11/25 2:58 27°25.70 S 42°59.80 W 2495 53 11/25 4:55 27°42.80 S 43°16.10 W 2983 54 11/25 6:57 27°58.70 S 43°33.30 W 3366 55 11/25 8:57 28°15.80 S 43°50.50 W 3570 56 11/25 11:04 28°32.00 S 44°06.90 W 3660 57 11/25 12:58 28°42.40 S 44°17.40 W 3673 58 12/16 21:28 31°36.90 S 28°49.70 W 3698 59 12/16 21:57 31°34.20 S 28°54.40 W 3442 60 12/16 23:55 31°22.40 S 29°14.40 W 2811 61 12/17 1:55 31°08.50 S 29°37.20 W 3046 62 12/17 3:52 30°55.70 S 29°58.70 W 3286 63 12/17 6:08 30°40.20 S 30°25.30 W 3838 64 12/17 7:51 30°28.80 S 30°44.60 W 4042 65 12/17 9:53 30°15.50 S 31°06.90 W 4065 66 12/17 13:23 30°10.10 S 31°15.50 W 4066 67 12/17 13:56 30°07.30 S 31°19.30 W 4065 68 12/17 15:50 29°53.40 S 31°36.10 W 4053 69 12/17 17:50 29°39.00 S 31°53.40 W 3720 70 12/17 19:48 29°24.70 S 32°10.40 W 3762 71 12/17 21:52 29°09.30 S 32°28.80 W 2409 72 12/17 23:52 28°55.20 S 32°45.70 W 2279 73 12/18 1:51 28°40.80 S 33°02.90 W 4348 74 12/18 3:52 28°26.20 S 33°20.10 W 4100 75 12/18 5:49 28°12.40 S 33°34.50 W 4259 76 12/18 8:04 27°52.10 S 33°50.90 W 4473 77 12/18 9:55 27°36.00 S 34°03.70 W 4497 78 12/18 14:13 27°22.60 S 34°14.80 W 4254 79 12/18 14:53 27°18.10 S 34°19.90 W 4197 80 12/18 16:58 27°02.40 S 34°37.40 W 3873 81 12/19 1:24 26°53.20 S 34°47.90 W 4776 82 12/19 2:52 26°43.80 S 34°55.40 W 4639 83 12/19 4:51 26°31.20 S 35°05.60 W 4438 84 12/19 6:52 26°19.60 S 35°15.30 W 4342 85 12/19 8:51 26°08.70 S 35°24.10 W 4226 86 12/19 11:00 25°58.50 S 35°32.20 W 4189 87 12/19 12:51 25°50.70 S 35°38.60 W 4167 88 12/19 14:50 25°46.20 S 35°59.70 W 4184 89 12/19 16:52 25°40.90 S 36°03.50 W 4183 90 12/19 18:50 25°35.20 S 36°18.60 W 4248 91 12/19 20:50 25°29.00 S 36°34.80 W 4232 92 12/20 0:56 25°15.90 S 37°09.40 W 4151 93 12/20 2:50 25°08.50 S 37°29.40 W 4113 94 12/20 4:53 25°00.40 S 37°51.10 W 3968 95 12/20 6:52 24°52.70 S 38°11.80 W 3867 96 12/20 9:02 24°45.60 S 38°31.10 W 3785 97 12/20 10:59 24°38.50 S 38°50.20 W 3636 98 12/20 13:04 24°31.80 S 39°08.00 W 3475 99 12/20 15:49 24°24.90 S 39°26.70 W 3327 100 12/20 18:55 24°17.10 S 39°47.80 W 3090 101 12/20 21:13 24°10.90 S 40°03.90 W 3034 102 12/20 23:30 24°05.50 S 40°19.00 W 2955 103 12/21 2:19 23°59.20 S 40°36.20 W 2755 104 12/21 5:27 23°52.90 S 40°53.30 W 2228 105 12/21 6:52 23°49.30 S 41°02.00 W 1860 106 12/21 8:28 23°46.30 S 41°11.20 W 1355 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7.3.3 MOORING ACTIVITIES 7.3.3.1 SOUND SOURCE MOORINGS Sta. Ext Int Date Latitude Longitude Depth Nr. of Remarks No. No. No. 1992 (m) Instr. 556 K1 351 11/25 28°49.7 S 44°26.3 W 3705 SoSo 79 launched MAFOS 11 window 1.30 UTC watch dog 5509, CB 583 K2 350 12/6 31°07.5 S 39°54.1 W 3807 SoSo 49 launched MAFOS 12 window 0.30 UTC watch dog 5514, CB 603 K0 352 12/11 34°18.9 S 28°30.0 W 4054 SoSo 71 launched window 1.30 UTC watch dog 5510, CB 616 K3 349 12/18 26°52.0 S 34°47.2 W 4864 SoSo 68 launched 3ACM window 1.00 UTC watch dog 5508,CB,fl --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7.3.3.2 CURRENT METER MOORINGS Sta. Ext Int Date Latitude Longitude Depth Nr. of Remarks No. No. No. (m) Instr. *1 BW 333 1/1/91 27°54.1 S 46°42.4 W 1179 1ADCP watch dog 4ACM 15171 558 11/27/92 100% recovered *8 BM 334 1/2/91 27°59.2 S 46°20.5 W 2187 5ACM 557 11/27/92 100% recovered *12 BE 335 1/3/91 28°16.2 W 45°13.8 W 3258 1ADCP watch dog 6ACM 15172 550 11/26/92 100% recovered *16 DB1 906 1/4/91 28°28.0 S 44°27.8 W 3633 5VACM watch dog 1Xponder +CB ok 575 12/3/92 100% recovered *20 DB2 907 1/5/91 29°02.6 S 43°29.0 W 3953 5VACM watch dog 1Xponder +CB ok 576 12/4/92 100% recovered *24 DB3 908 1/6/91 29°32.0 S 42°42.2 W 4017 2VACM CB def. 1XPonder 577 12/4/92 100% recovered *28 DB4 909 1/7/91 30°05.2 S 41°44.2 W 3798 5VACM watch dog 1Xponder +CB ok 579 12/5/92 100% recovered *32 DB5 910 1/8/91 30°35.3 S 40°47.3 W 3720 2VACM CB 1XPonder 580 12/5/92 not recovered *36 VW 336 1/9/91 31°12.3 S 39°46.0 W 3965 5ACM CB ok 584 12/6/92 100% recovered *37 VM 337 1/9/91 31°09.8 S 39°26.5 W 4637 3ACM CB no response 590 12/7/92 lost *40 VE 338 1/11/91 31°08.4 S 39°26.0 W 4646 7ACM CB dual release 585 12/6/92 100% recovered *39 DB6 912 1/11/91 31°05.1 S 39°09.1 W 4140 3VACM CB 1XPonder 591 12/7/92 100% recovered *44 DBK 343 1/12/91 31°09.3 S 38°49.6 W 3652 5ACM CB ok 1XPonder 592 12/7/92 100% recovered *38 DBK'343' 1/10/91 31°06.5 S 38°47.5 W 3599 1VACM lost during 911 1release deployment 593 12/7/92 confirmed 602 H1 353 12/11/92 34°15.5 S 28°52.3 W 4112 6ACM launched 1MAFOS 10 CB 604 H2 354 12/12/92 34°25.5 S 27°51.6 W 4292 2ACM launched CB 605 H3 355 12/12- appr 1500 m SSW of 5ACM launch interrupt. 14/92 (34°22.4 S 27°42.3 W) (4436) by unexpected storm, no CB, dual release 606 H4 356 12/14/92 34°30.8 S 27°19.2 W 4336 2ACM launched 200mThCh CB 607 H5 357 12/14/92 34°35.1 S 27°03.4 W 4836 2ACM launched 200mThCh CB, flash 609 H6 358 12/15/92 34°32.3 S 26°58.5 W 4303 ADCP launched 5ACM watch dog 5506, CB dual release 612 R 363 12/16/92 31°37.1 S 28°48.6 W 3719 2ACM launched (-3750) CB * = M 15/1 (siehe: Siedler, G. und W. Zenk (1992): WOCE Südatlantik 1991, Reise Nr. 15, 30. Dezember 1990 - 23. März 1991. METEOR-Berichte, Universität Hamburg, 92-1, 126 S.) Acronyms: ADCP Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler ACM Aanderaa current meter CB bouy radio transmitter (CB radio) VACM Vector averaging current meter ThCh Thermistor chain Xponder transponder ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7.3.4 RAFOS FLOATS AND MAFOS ACTIVITIES 7.3.4.1 RAFOS FLOATS Sta Float Date Time Latitude Longitude Depth ARGOS Duration Remarks No. IfM 1992 UTC (m) (DecNr) (month) 540 63 11/20 13:07 13°56.91 S 36°16.44 W 4343 6AD7A 9 trop. (6837) ocean 545 65 11/24 19:36 26°28.57 S 42°03.32 W 2587 6ADDC 9 BrasC (6839) 575 67 12/03 21:28 28°27.08 S 44°27.68 W 3627 6AE5B 9 DB1 (6841) 577 66 12/04 20:28 29°30.87 S 42°42.14 W 4017 6AE08 3 DB3 (6840) 580 68 12/05 21:25 30°34.92 S 40°42.14 W 3728 6AEAE [12] DB5 12/11 (6842) surfaced 595 70 12/08 13:51 31°12.0 S 39°21.0 W 4558 C54F1 6 Vema 1 (12627) 595 71 12/08 13:55 31°11.8 S 39°21.1 W 4557 6AF17 9 Vema 2 (6844) 597 72 12/09 6:20 31°40.0 S 37°45.2 W 4035 6AF44 3 RioG W (6845) 598 74 12/09 18:20 32°13.9 S 35°50.0 W 2667 6AFE2 12 RioG M (6847) 599 75 12/10 4:39 32°46.0 S 33°54.9 W 4000 6B00E 6 RioG E (6848) 600 77 12/10 14:11 33°19.0 S 31°59.9 W 4152 74966 9 RioG/Hunt (7461) 601 76 12/10 1:09 33°51.0 S 30°53.6 W 5152 6B05D 3 Deep VlyS (6849) 607 80 12/15 2:00 34°36.78 S 27°01.28 W 4249 74A14 12 Hunter (7464) 610 81 12/16 2:14 33°39.71 S 27°32.01 W 4080 74A47 6 Hunter N (7465) 611 82 12/16 9:30 32°30.22 S 28°17.30 W 4026 74AB2 9 Hunter-R (7466) 612 84 12/16 21:12 31°38.06 S 28°47.61 W 3828 74B0B 3 RioGrRise (7468) 613 86 12/17 13:18 30°10.55 S 31°15.02 W 4070 74BAD 12 DeepVlyN (7470) 614 87 12/18 5:11 28°17.80 S 33°30.10 W 3590 C5215 6 RioGrR N (12616) 615 88 12/18 14:03 27°22.93 S 34°14.35 W 4220 C5246 9 DeepBasE (12617) 616 89 12/18 1:09 26°53.0 S 34°47.4 W 4772 C52B3 3 Vema Ext (12618) 617 91 12/19 13:19 25°49.8 S 35°40.1 W 4169 C530A 12 DeepBasM (12620) 618 90 12/19 23:12 25°21.49 S 36°54.49 W 4191 C52E0 6 DeepBasW (12619) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7.3.4.2 MAFOS MONITORS Sta No. Date Time Latitude Longitude Deployment Mooring Duration No. IfM 1992 UTC Depth (m) (days) K1 M11 11/25 15:13 28°43.7 S 44°26.3 W 900 SoSo79 650 K2 M12 12/06 10:11 31°07.5 S 39°54.1 W 900 SoSo49 650 H1 M10 12/11 13:50 34°15.5 S 28°52.3 W 850 CM Mooring 650 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7.3.5 DRIFTER ACTIVITIES M 22/3-4 Stat Drifter Date Time Latitude Longitude Temp Depth Remarks No. (ARGOS) 1992 UTC (°C) (m) 575 15182 12/ 3 21:38 28°27.0 S 44°27.6 W 21.7 3636 close to DB1 577 15186 12/ 4 20:35 29°30.7 S 42°42.1 W 21.1 4017 close to DB3 580 15178 12/ 5 21:34 30°34.7 S 40°45.8 W 20.9 3706 close to DB5 585 15181 12/ 6 20:50 31°06.4 S 39°25.0 S 19.9 4638 1Vema Channel 595 11331 12/ 8 13:59 31°11.6 S 39°21.1 W 19.7 4568 2Vema Channel 597 11303 12/ 9 6:33 31°39.7 S 37°45.4 W 19.5 4036 Rio Gr R West 600 11326 12/10 14:18 33°18.9 S 31°59.9 W 18.5 4152 Rio Gr R/Hunt 601 11327 12/10 1:15 33°51.1 S 30°53.5 W 18.4 5146 Deep Valley 603 11319 12/11 0:19 34°17.5 W 28°30.2 W 19.0 4045 Hunter K0 604 11301 12/12 13:40 34°25.5 S 27°51.3 W 18.8 4300 Hunter H3 607 11333 12/15 2:00 34°36.8 S 27°01.2 W 17.7 4305 Hunter H5 609 11318 12/15 20:10 34°32.1 S 26°58.5 W 17.9 4310 Hunter H6 616 15184 12/18 1:14 26°52.0 S 34°47.5 W 22.9 4770 K3 617 15185 12/19 13:30 25°49.9 S 35°39.9 W 23.8 4167 DeepB M E 618 11316 12/19 23:17 25°21.5 S 36°54.5 W 24.3 4190 DeepB M W 619 12269 12/20 7:43 24°50.4 S 38°15.2 W 24.0 3873 DeepB W --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7.3.6 LIST OF XCP LAUNCHES Sta. XCP XCP Date Time Latitude Longitude Depth No. No. S/N 1992 UTC (m) 618 1 92061006 12/19 23:40 25°20.7 S 36°56.6 W 4202 619 2 92061013 12/20 7:44 24°50.3 S 38°18.5 W 3866 - 3 92071017 12/20 11:25 24°37.7 S 38°52.5 W 3629 - 4 92071018 12/20 15:45 24°24.9 S 39°20.0 W 3400 - 5 92041007 12/20 21:30 24°10.0 S 40°02.0 W 3033 - 6 92061008 12/20 23:10 24°05.4 S 40°18.9 W 2966 - 7 92061017 12/21 2:14 23°59.0 S 40°36.0 W 2793 - 8 92061015 12/21 5:12 23°52.8 S 40°53.0 W 2232 - 9 92061014 12/21 8:18 23°46.1 S 41°11.0 W 1468 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7.4 LEG M 22/ 5 7.4.1 LIST OF CTD STATIONS Station Date Start End Latitude Logitude Depth NS F He O2 Nut CO2 Alk Tr S C14 pH No. 1992/ (m) 1993 UTC 620 12/28 14:10 16:13 25°39.0 S 42°10.5 W 2299 X X X X X X X X 621 19:04 23:07 25°58.9 S 42°35.5 W 2420 X X X X X 622 12/30 6:14 7:48 27°43.5 S 47°23.0 W 179 X X X X X 623 8:55 10:02 27°46.2 S 47°12.2 W 327 X X X X X X X X 624 11:13 12:20 27°45.6 S 47°13.0 W 535 X X X X X 625 13:32 16:20 27°51.6 S 46°50.7 W 758 X X X X X X X 626 17:20 20:36 27°54.5 S 46°40.0 W 1257 X X X X 627 21:40 0:08 27°57.1 S 46°29.1 W 1699 X X X X X X X X X 628 12/31 1:47 5:10 27°59.9 S 46°18.4 W 2226 X X X X X 629 6:08 10:00 28°02.6 S 46°07.6 W 2422 X X X X X X 630 10:57 15:10 28°05.4 S 45°56.7 W 2603 X X X X 631 16:30 20:27 28°09.4 S 45°40.6 W 2793 X X X X X X X X X 632 21:53 0:02 28°13.6 S 45°24.5 W 2970 X X X X 001 1/01 6:00 8:44 28°24.7 S 44°48.1 W 3482 X X X X X X 002 12:15 15:00 28°37.0 S 44°13.0 W 3699 X X X X X 003 18:46 22:42 28°50.0 S 43°35.0 W 3892 X X X X X X X X X 004 1/02 2:35 6:00 29°01.8 S 42°55.9 W 4003 X X X X 005 9:30 13:30 29°13.2 S 42°21.7 W 4002 X X X X X X 006 16:50 20:05 29°24.9 S 41°46.0 W 3925 X X X X X 007 23:30 3:15 29°36.4 S 41°11.0 W 3902 X X X X X X X X X X 008 1/03 6:48 10:28 29°47.9 S 40°36.4 W 3779 X X X X X X 009 13:38 15:55 29°59.5 S 40°01.5 W 3193 X X X X X X 010 18:50 22:27 30°00.1 S 39°31.8 W 3962 X X X X X X 011 1/4 0:00 4:25 30°00.2 S 39°21.0 W 4896 X X X X X X X X X X 012 6:54 11:02 30°00.0 S 38°55.0 W 4275 X X X X 013 13:00 16:25 30°00.0 S 38°31.3 W 4227 X X X X X X X X 014 19:03 22:22 30°00.1 S 38°00.2 W 3850 X X X X X 015 1/5 0:55 3:20 30°00.0 S 37°31.4 W 3348 X X X X X X X X X 016 5:10 7:14 30°00.0 S 37°10.1 W 2341 X X X 017 8:53 10:53 29°59.9 S 36°51.4 W 1698 X X X X X X 018 12:30 13:55 30°00.1 S 36°29.8 W 1788 X X X 019 15:30 16:25 30°00.0 S 36°11.5 W 788 X X X X 020 18:00 21:52 30°00.1 S 35°58.5 W 2400 X X X X X X X 021 22:31 0:45 30°00.0 S 35°31.0 W 2514 X X X X 022 1/6 2:25 4:15 30°00.0 S 35°10.0 W 2153 X X X 023 5:45 8:04 30°00.0 S 34°51.6 W 1655 X X X X 024 9:50 11:17 30°00.0 S 34°30.0 W 1432 X X X X X X X X 025 13:40 15:35 30°00.0 S 34°01.5 W 1960 X X X X 026 18:20 20:45 29°59.9 S 33°30.0 W 3158 X X X X X X X 027 23:23 2:30 29°59.9 S 33°01.5 W 3517 X X X X 028 1/7 5:30 9:00 30°00.0 S 32°30.0 W 3750 X X X X X X 029 11:38 14:50 29°59.9 S 32°01.5 W 3823 X X X X 030 17:37 20:53 30°00.0 S 31°30.1 W 3867 X X X X X X X 031 23:15 2:30 30°00.0 S 31°01.2 W 4073 X X X X X X X X X 032 1/8 5:14 8:23 30°00.0 S 30°30.0 W 3943 X X X X X X 033 10:56 14:10 30°00.0 S 30°00.9 W 3320 X X X X 034 17:20 19:14 30°00.0 S 29°30.0 W 2260 X X X X X X X 035 1/9 4:45 7:23 29°59.3 S 29°02.0 W 3199 X X X X 036 10:12 13:10 29°59.8 S 28°25.1 W 3770 X X X X X X X 037 17:20 21:25 29°59.9 S 27°35.7 W 4882 X X X X X 038 1/10 1:40 5:12 30°00.0 S 26°43.0 W 5317 X X X X X X X 039 9:22 13:00 29°59.9 S 25°53.3 W 4402 X X X X 040 17:00 23:29 30°00.0 S 25°01.0 W 5525 X X X X X X X X 041 1/11 3:40 7:26 30°00.0 S 24°11.7 W 5038 X X X X 042 11:44 14:45 30°00.0 S 23°18.9 W 4612 X X X X X X X X 043 18:54 22:48 29°59.9 S 22°30.6 W 4586 X X X X 044 1/12 3:15 6:43 30°00.0 S 21°37.0 W 4845 X X X X X X X X 045 11:11 14:52 30°00.0 S 20°47.6 W 4897 X X X X 046 19:08 22:40 29°59.9 S 19°55.0 W 4803 X X X X X X X 047 1/13 2:40 8:20 29°59.7 S 19°05.5 W 4105 X X X X X 048 11:42 15:00 30°00.1 S 18°22.9 W 4182 X X X X X X 049 1/14 4:00 7:33 30°00.0 S 17°43.6 W 3996 X X X X 050 10:52 13:25 30°00.0 S 17°01.0 W 3672 X X X X X X X 051 16:32 19:55 30°00.0 S 16°21.7 W 3519 X X X X 052 23:13 1:12 30°00.1 S 15°40.0 W 3280 X X X X X X X 053 1/15 4:31 8:15 30°00.0 S 15°01.6 W 3821 X X X X 054 11:48 13:55 30°00.0 S 14°19.9 W 2883 X X X X X X X 055 17:12 19:23 30°00.2 S 13°42.1 W 2291 X X X X 056 22:40 0:50 30°00.0 S 12°59.6 W 3101 X X X X X X 057 1/16 4:12 7:27 30°00.0 S 12°21.9 W 3266 X X X X X 058 11:07 12:55 30°00.0 S 11°40.5 W 3479 X X X X X X X 059 16:53 20:07 30°00.0 S 11°01.8 W 3550 X X X X X 060 23:18 1:55 30°00.0 S 10°19.8 W 3784 X X X X X X 061 1/17 5:05 8:25 30°00.0 S 09°42.0 W 3935 X X X X X 062 11:42 14:25 30°00.0 S 08°59.9 W 3970 X X X X X X X 063 18:13 21:37 30°00.0 S 08°11.9 W 3940 X X X X X 064 1/18 1:30 5:00 30°00.0 S 07°20.0 W 4167 X X X X X X 065 8:48 14:50 30°00.0 S 06°31.5 W 4279 X X X X X X 066 19:01 22:16 30°00.0 S 05°40.0 W 4386 X X X X X X X 067 1/19 2:00 5:48 30°00.0 S 04°51.7 W 4277 X X X X X X 068 9:54 12:30 29°59.8 S 04°00.0 W 3986 X X X X X X X 069 16:32 20:25 30°00.0 S 03°12.0 W 4440 X X X X X X 070 1/20 00:15 03:50 30°00.0 S 02°21.7 W 4403 X X X X X X X X X 071 07:51 11:40 30°00.0 S 01°31.5 W 4481 X X X X X X X 072 16:05 19:36 30°00.9 S 00°43.9 W 4852 X X X X X X X X 073 23:00 2:15 30°00.0 S 00°02.0 W 4130 X X X X X X 074 1/21 5:25 7:41 29°51.9 S 00°34.0 E 3319 X X X X X X X 075 10:28 13:25 29°44.3 S 01°06.4 E 3686 X X X X X 076 16:30 19:13 29°36.1 S 01°42.0 E 3650 X X X X X X X 077 21:55 0:00 29°28.3 S 02°14.8 E 2727 X X X X 078 1/22 3:16 6:42 29°20.0 S 02°50.0 E 4252 X X X X X X X X X 079 9:03 12:40 29°28.1 S 03°16.7 E 4707 X X X X X 080 15:16 18:55 29°36.7 S 03°46.7 E 4926 X X X X X X 081 1/23 7:00 10:33 29°44.4 S 04°13.1 E 4952 X X X X X X X X X X X 082 15:04 19:00 29°45.0 S 05°06.0 E 5134 X X X X 083 23:00 3:18 29°45.0 S 05°54.0 E 5133 X X X X X X X 084 1/24 8:01 11:30 29°45.2 S 06°46.8 E 5185 X X X X 085 15:38 19:53 29°45.0 S 07°35.2 E 5178 X X X X X X X X X X 086 1/25 0:45 4:26 29°45.0 S 08°28.0 E 5059 X X X X X 087 10:00 13:55 29°44.7 S 09°16.6 E 5023 X X X X X X X X 088 19:12 0:10 29°44.9 S 10°08.7 E 4884 X X X X X X X 089 1/26 4:48 8:29 29°45.0 S 10°56.8 E 4293 X X X X X X X X X 090 13:00 18:06 29°45.0 S 11°47.3 E 4011 X X X X X X 091 19:55 0:20 29°37.8 S 12°08.6 E 3840 X X X X X X X X 092 1/27 2:13 7:34 29°30.6 S 12°26.3 E 3677 X X X X 093 9:12 13:23 29°23.2 S 12°46.0 E 3398 X X X X X X X X X 094 15:07 18:58 29°15.7 S 13°04.2 E 3135 X X X X X 095 20:36 23:55 29°08.1 S 13°23.5 E 2711 X X X X X X X X 096 1/28 1:40 03:56 29°00.7 S 13°42.1 E 2223 X X X X 097 5:57 07:32 28°53.3 S 14°01.2 E 1607 X X X X X X X X X 098 9:34 10:25 28°45.6 S 14°20.4 E 531 X X X X X 099 12:05 12:55 28°38.1 S 14°39.5 E 160 X X X X X 100 14:27 15:20 28°30.7 S 14°58.2 E 177 X NS : Neustron net F : Freon He : Helium O2 : Oxygen Nut: Nutreon CO2 : CO 2 Alk: Alkalinity Tr : Tritium S : Salinity C14: C14 pH : pH --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7.4.2 LIST OF XBT DROPS Profile Date Time Latitude Longitude Depth No. 1992 UTC (m) 107 12/28 1:05 23°38.1 S 42°50.5 W 122m 108 12/28 1:30 23°42.5 S 42°48.4 W 144m 109 12/28 2:00 23°47.2 S 42°46.2 W 210m 110 12/28 2:30 23°52.6 S 42°43.9 W 756m 111 12/28 3:00 23°57.2 S 42°41.9 W 825m 112 12/28 3:30 24°01.9 S 42°39.7 W 902m 113 12/28 4:00 24°07.0 S 42°37.5 W 937m 114 12/28 4:30 24°11.4 S 42°35.6 W 854m 115 12/28 5:00 24°15.9 S 42°33.5 W 910m 116 12/28 5:30 24°20.5 S 42°31.4 W 915m 117 12/28 6:00 24°25.2 S 42°29.3 W 1592m 118 12/28 6:30 24°20.0 S 42°27.2 W 1674m 119 12/28 7:00 24°34.5 S 42°25.2 W 1973m 120 12/28 7:30 24°39.2 S 42°23.0 W 2019m 121 12/28 8:00 24°43.7 S 42°21.1 W 2094m 122 12/28 8:30 24°48.5 S 42°18.9 W 2135m 123 12/28 9:00 24°53.4 S 42°16.9 W 2328m 124 12/28 9:30 24°58.0 S 42°14.6 W 2216m 125 12/28 10:00 25°02.9 S 42°12.6 W 2235m 126 12/28 10:30 25°07.6 S 42°10.4 W 2168m 127 12/28 11:00 25°12.4 S 42°08.0 W 2187m 128 12/28 11:30 25°17.2 S 42°05.7 W 2237m 129 12/28 12:00 25°22.2 S 42°03.5 W 2293m 130 12/28 12:30 25°26.4 S 42°01.6 W 2593m 131 12/28 13:00 25°31.5 S 42°01.6 W 2328m 132 12/28 13:30 25°35.1 S 42°05.8 W 2333m 133 12/28 14:00 25°38.8 S 42°10.2 W 2284m 134 12/29 17:30 28°15.9 S 45°15.3 W 3135m 135 12/29 18:00 28°14.5 S 45°20.6 W 3083m 136 12/29 18:30 28°13.0 S 45°26.6 W 2945m 137 12/29 19:00 28°11.6 S 45°31.7 W 2859m 138 12/29 19:30 28°10.3 S 45°37.5 W 2824m 139 12/29 20:00 28°08.8 S 45°42.8 W 2778m 140 12/29 20:30 28°07.3 S 45°48.8 W 2727m 141 12/29 21:00 28°06.1 S 45°53.9 W 2649m 142 12/29 21:30 28°04.6 S 45°59.8 W 2556m 143 12/29 22:00 28°03.2 S 46°05.8 W 2456m 144 12/29 22:30 28°01.7 S 46°11.5 W 2364m 145 12/29 23:00 28°00.3 S 46°17.2 W 2267m 146 12/29 23:30 27°58.9 S 46°23.0 W 2053m 147 12/29 24:00 27°57.4 S 46°28.9 W 1715m 148 12/30 0:30 27°56.1 S 46°34.3 W 1457m 149 12/30 1:00 27°54.5 S 46°40.4 W 1239m 150 12/30 1:30 27°53.1 S 46°46.3 W 986m 151 12/30 2:00 27°51.7 S 46°51.7 W 721m 152 12/30 2:30 27°50.1 S 46°57.9 W 595m 153 12/30 3:00 47°03.6 S 47°03.6 W 513m 154 12/30 3:30 27°47.3 S 47°09.1 W 400m 155 12/30 4:00 27°45.8 S 47°14.8 W 271m 156 12/30 4:30 27°44.4 S 47°20.3 W 200m 157 12/30 5:00 27°42.9 S 47°26.3 W 157m 159 12/30 5:30 27°41.6 S 47°29.9 W 146m 159 1/09 15:23 30°00.0 S 28°00.0 W 4529m 160 1/09 23:33 30°00.0 S 27°09.2 W 4727m 39 1/10 7:25 29°59.9 S 26°10.1 W - 162 1/10 15:00 30°00.0 S 25°27.0 W 4555m 163 1/11 1:41 30°00.0 S 24°36.0 W 4775m 164 1/11 9:35 30°00.0 S 23°44.9 W 4746m 165 1/11 17:07 29°59.8 S 22°53.2 W - 166 1/12 1:00 30°00.0 S 22°03.0 W 4646m 167 1/12 9:05 30°00.2 S 21°11.9 W 4789m 168 1/12 17:00 30°00.0 S 20°21.0 W - 169 1/13 0:45 30°00.0 S 19°30.0 W 4538m 170 1/13 9:54 30°00.0 S 18°44.2 W 3800m 171 1/13 20:36 30°00.0 S 18°01.3 W 4206m 172 1/14 9:12 30°00.0 S 17°20.8 W 3973m 173 1/14 15:05 30°00.0 S 16°40.0 W 3466m 174 1/14 21:34 30°00.0 S 16°00.0 W 3828m 175 1/15 3:00 30°00.0 S 15°20.0 W 3142m 176 1/15 10:05 30°00.0 S 14°39.8 W 3426m 177 1/15 15:45 30°00.0 S 14°00.0 W 2480m 178 1/15 20:59 30°00.0 S 13°19.8 W 2843m 179 1/16 2:45 30°00.0 S 12°40.0 W 3152m 180 1/16 9:24 30°00.0 S 11°59.9 W 3552m 181 1/16 15:30 30°00.0 S 11°20.0 W 3452m 182 1/16 21:37 30°00.0 S 10°39.9 W 3741m 183 1/17 3:40 30°00.0 S 10°00.0 W 3830m 184 1/17 10:00 30°00.0 S 09°19.8 W 3850m 185 1/17 16:30 30°00.0 S 08°34.1 W 4002m 186 1/17 23:33 30°00.0 S 07°43.6 W 4069m 187 1/18 6:58 30°00.0 S 06°55.0 W - 188 1/18 17:05 30°00.0 S 06°05.0 W 4384m 189 1/19 0:15 30°00.0 S 05°15.0 W 4541m 190 1/19 7:47 30°00.0 S 04°24.9 W 4382m 191 1/19 14:40 30°00.0 S 03°35.0 W 4310m 192 1/19 22:28 30°00.1 S 02°44.5 W 4560m 193 1/20 4:52 29°59.6 S 02°06.0 W 4439m 194 1/20 5:52 30°00.0 S 01°54.0 W 4665m 195 1/20 6:50 30°00.0 S 01°43.4 W 4755m 196 1/20 13:40 30°00.0 S 01°05.0 W 4602m 197 1/20 21:30 30°00.6 S 00°19.8 W 4407m 198 1/21 3:49 29°56.0 S 00°17.0 E 3323m 199 1/21 09:08 29°47.9 W 00°51.0 E 3266m 200 1/21 14:55 29°40.0 S 01°25.0 E 3743m 201 1/21 20:38 29°32.0 S 01°59.3 E 2306m 202 1/22 1:45 29°24.0 S 02°33.0 E 1962m 203 1/23 12:53 29°45.0 S 04°41.0 E 4891m 204 1/23 21:07 29°45.0 S 05°32.3 E 5113m 205 1/24 5:43 29°45.0 S 06°22.0 E 5187m 206 1/24 13:50 29°45.0 S 07°13.0 E 5182m 208 1/24 22:14 29°45.0 S 08°03.3 E 5131m 209 1/25 7:24 29°45.0 S 08°54.2 E 5044m 210 1/25 16:32 29°45.0 S 09°44.0 E 4942m 211 1/26 2:20 29°45.0 S 10°34.0 E 4580m 212 1/26 2:25 29°45.0 S 10°34.8 E 213 1/26 10:54 29°45.0 S 11°24.5 E 4129m 214 1/26 18:21 29°45.0 S 11°53.0 S 3981m 215 1/26 18:34 29°44.1 S 11°54.3 E 3983m 216 1/26 19:01 29°41.2 S 11°59.8 E 3914m 217 1/27 0:50 29°36.3 S 12°12.3 E 3811m 218 1/27 1:00 29°36.7 S 12°13.1 E 3800m 219 1/27 1:30 29°33.8 S 12°18.5 E 3749m 220 1/27 7:49 29°28.8 S 12°30.6 E 3691m 221 1/27 7:56 29°28.4 S 12°31.5 E 3724m 222 1/27 8:28 29°26.3 S 12°37.7 E 3536m 223 1/27 13:48 29°21.2 S 12°50.1 E 3330m 224 1/27 14:00 29°20.7 S 12°51.0 E 3320m 225 1/27 14:25 29°18.8 S 12°56.5 E 3230m 226 1/27 19:12 29°13.2 S 13°08.2 E 3080m 227 1/27 19:22 29°12.8 S 13°09.2 E 3052m 228 1/27 19:55 29°11.3 S 13°15.7 E 2711m 229 1/8 0:15 29°06.8 S 13°27.0 E 2629m 230 1/8 0:25 29°06.3 S 13°28.0 E 2607m 231 1/8 1:00 29°03.8 S 13°34.5 E 2390m 232 1/8 4:15 29°00.1 S 13°44.0 E 2154m 233 1/8 4:24 28°59.6 S 13°44.9 E 2128m 234 1/8 5:12 28°56.2 S 13°53.7 E 1929m 235 1/8 7:45 28°53.0 S 14°03.3 E 1402m 236 1/8 7:50 28°52.9 S 14°03.6 E 1400m 237 1/8 8:42 28°48.8 S 14°12.7 E 1410m 238 1/8 11:22 28°41.3 S 14°31.5 E 185m ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7.4.3 LIST OF XCP LAUNCHES Station XCP Date Time Latitude Longitude Depth No. No. 1993 UTC (m) 625 10 12/30 16:10 27°51.0 S 46°50.0 W 772 626 11 12/30 20:30 27°54.7 S 46°38.6 W 1306 627 12 12/31 0:35 27°56.9 S 46°27.4 W 1789 629 13 12/31 9:56 28°01.7 S 46°05.9 W 2430 630 14 12/31 15:05 28°05.3 S 45°52.2 W 2650 631 15 12/31 20:19 28°08.1 S 45°37.2 W 2807 090 16 1/26 18:11 29°45.1 S 11°52.5 E 3982 091 17 1/27 0:35 29°37.1 S 12°12.3 E 3811 092 18 1/27 7:37 29°29.1 S 12°29.7 E 3659 093 19 1/27 13:30 29°21.6 S 12°50.3 E 3331 094 20 1/27 19:01 29°13.5 S 13°07.7 E 3091 095 21 1/28 0:00 29°07.4 S 13°26.9 E 2639 096 22 1/28 4:02 29°00.3 S 13°44.2 E 2150 097 23 1/28 7:36 28°53.1 S 14°02.9 E 1435 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7.4.4 RAFOS FLOATS Station Float Date Time Latitude Longitude Depth ARGOSDuration Remarks No. IfM 1993 UTC (m) (DecNr) (month) 12 93 1/04 11:02 30°01.10 S 38°54.70 W 4269 C53FF [12] (12623) surfaced ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7.4.5 DRIFTER ACTIVITIES Station Drifter Date Time Latitude Longitude Depth No. (ARGOS) 1993 UTC (m) 053 11347 1/15 8:20 30°00.2 S 15°00.3 W 3835 057 11304 1/16 7:33 29°59.3 S 12°20.8 W 3136 062 11311 1/17 14:30 30°02.3 S 08°59.1 W 3987 066 1583 1/18 22:20 30°00.2 S 05°38.9 W 4441 069 11317 1/19 20:30 30°00.8 S 03°09.7 W 4351 073 15155 1/21 2:20 29°59.6 S 00°00.8 E 3902 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7.4.6 LIST OF LADCP PROFILES Station Date Time Wire- Longitude Latitude Depth No. 1992/ UTC length (m) 1993 (m) 621 12/28 20:34 1200 25°59.4 S 42°35.0 W 2390 12/29 17:22 ADCP section 28°16.0 S 45°13.8 W course 286, 11.0 kn 625 12/30 14:35 550 27°51.7 S 46°51.0 W 746 626 12/30 18:52 1038 27°54.3 S 46°40.7 W 1232 627 12/30 23:04 1200 27°56.7 S 46°29.1 W 1692 628 12/31 03:35 1200 27°59.1 S 46°18.5 W 2212 629 12/31 08:14 1300 28°02.1 S 46°07.8 W 2418 630 12/31 13:28 1200 28°05.2 S 45°55.4 W 2616 631 12/31 18:36 1300 28°08.6 S 45°39.9 W 2799 90 1/26 16:53 1300 29°45.2 S 11°51.7 E 4000 91 1/26 23:05 1313 29°37.6 S 12°11.7 E 3812 92 1/27 06:22 1300 29°29.4 S 12°29.2 E 3648 93 1/27 12:20 1300 29°22.1 S 12°49.7 E 3342 94 1/27 17:48 1300 29°14.2 S 13°07.2 E 3103 95 1/27 22:45 1300 29.07.5 S 13°26.0 E 2662 29.01. lADCP terminated due to technical problems 8 CONCLUDING REMARKS The successful observations during METEOR cruise no. 22 could not have been achieved without the excellent assistance of the captains Müller and Kull, together with their crews. We also want to thank the members of the Leitstelle METEOR and particularly Embassador Wallau and Dr. Matthes of the German Embassy in Brasilia as well as General Consul Marquardt at the German Consulate in Recife for their most valuable help. The work was funded by the research contracts Si 111/39-1 of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and 03F0050D of the Bundesministerium für Forschung und Technologie. 9 REFERENCES ANDRES, H.-G., H.-Ch. JOHN and C. ZELCK (1992): Biologische Ozeanographie und marine Taxonomie. In: SIEDLER, G. und W. ZENK: WOCE Südatlantik 1991, Reise Nr. 15,0B30. Dezember 1990 - 23. März 1991. Meteor-Berichte, Univ. Hamburg 92-1, 74-85. ASPER, V. L. (1987): Measuring the flux and sinking speed of marine snow aggregates. Deep-Sea Res., 34, 1-17. DHI (1971): Monatskarten für den südatlantischen Ozean. Nr. 2421. III Auflage, DHI, Hamburg. HENTSCHEL, E. (1933): Allgemeine Biologie des südatlantischen Ozeans. I. Das Pelagial der obersten Wasserschicht. Wiss. Ergebn. dt. atlant. Exped. "Meteor" 1925-1927, 11, 1-168. HINZ, K., L. HASSE und F. SCHOTT (1991): SUBTROPISCHER & TROPISCHER ATLANTIK, Reise Nr. 14/1-3, Maritime Meteorologie und Physikalische Ozeanographie, 17. September - 30. Dezember 1990. METEOR-Berichte, Universität Hamburg, 91-3, 58 pp. HONJO, S., K.W. DOHERTY, Y.C. AGRAWAL and V.L. ASPER (1984): Direct optical assessment of large amorphous aggregates (marine snow) in the deep ocean. Deep-Sea Res., 31, 67-76. HULLEY, P.A. (1981): Results of the research cruises of FRV "Walter Herwig" to South America. LVIII. Family Myctophidae (Osteichthyes, Myctophiformes). Arch. Fisch. Wiss. 31 (Beih. 1), 1-303. LAMPITT, R.S. (1985): Evidence for seasonal deposition of detritus to the deep sea floor and its subsequent resuspension. Deep-Sea Res., 32, 885-897. PARIN, N.V. (1970): Ichthyofauna of the epipelagic zone. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, 1-205. REID, J.L., (1989): On the total geostrophic circulation of the South Atlantik Ocean: Flow patterns, tracers, and transports. Progr. Oceanogr., 23, 149- 244. SIEDLER, G. und W. ZENK, (1992): WOCE Südatlantik 1991, Reise Nr. 15, 30. Dezember 1990 - 23. März 1991. METEOR-Berichte, Universität Hamburg, 92-1, 126 pp. (engl. translation available at IfMK). SPEER, K. and W. ZENK (1993): On the flow of Antarctic Bottom Water across the Rio Grande Rise and beyond. Journ. Physical Oceanogr. (in press). SPEER, K., W. ZENK, G. SIEDLER, J. PÄETZOLD and C. HEIDLAND, (1992): First resolution of flow through the Hunter Channel in the South Atlantic. Earth a. Planet. Sc. Letters, 113, 287-292. World Meteorological Organization (1988): World Ocean Circulation Experiment Implementation Plan, Vol. 1, WRCP-11 , WMO/TD No. 242 WÜST, G., (1935): Schichtung und Zirkulation des Atlantischen Ozeans. Die Stratosphäre. In: Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Deutschen Atlantischen Expedition auf dem Forschungs- und Vermessungsschiff "Meteor" 1925 - 1927, 6. Lieferung 1. Teil, 2, 1-288. (The stratosphere of the Atlantic Ocean, W.J. EMERY (Editor) 1978, Amerind, New Delhi, 1-112). ZEMBA, J.C. (1991): The structure and transport of the Brazil Current between 27°and 36°South. Ph.D. Thesis MIT & WHOI, Cambridge and Woods Hole, 160 pp. ZENK, W., K. SPEER and N. HOGG (1993): Bathymetry at the Vema Sill. Deep Sea Res., 40 (9), 1925-1933. 10 FIGURES (*all figures shown in PDF file) Fig. 1a: Track and working areas of METEOR cruise no. 22, legs 1 and 5 Fig. 1b: Cruise track and oceanographic stations, leg 2 Fig. 1c: Cruise track and working areas, legs 3 and 4 Fig. 1d: Cruise track METEOR 22/2 CTD/IADCP and Pegasus stations, the positions of the moorings are included Fig. 2: Cruise track of METEOR cruise no. 22, leg 1 Fig. 3: Cruise track M 22/2. XBT drops during M 22/2 Fig. 4: METEOR M 22/3 cruise track: XBTs (stars), CTD stations (crosses), sound source mooring K1 (deployed) and current meter moorings BE, BM, BW (recovered). Fig. 5a: Track chart of METEOR cruise 22/4. This leg started in Santos on December 2, 1992 and was terminated in Rio de Janeiro on December 22, 1992. Fig. 5b: Scientific party of METEOR cruise 22/4. For list of participants see Table 2. Fig. 6: Cruise track M 22/5. The depth contours represent the 2000 and 4000 m isopleths. Fig. 7: Cruise track M 22/5 (western part) Fig. 8: Stations along WHP section A10, 30°8 S Fig. 9a,b: Map of stations where moorings with sediment traps were deployed off NW-Africa and in the equatorial Atlantic. The maps also contain moorings deployed at the same positions during previous cruises. Fig. 10a-c: Volume (arbitrary units) of particles in individual cups of the three sediment traps attached to mooring EA8 (recovered at 6°S in the Gulf of Guinea). The traps started sampling on December 15, 1991 and the last cup stopped sampling at October 6, 1992. For further details see chapter 7.1.2 Fig. 11: Perspective view and size of the particle camera system: 1: 70 mm 2 and 3: 150 W-strobes PHOTOSEA 1500s 4: Collimator, consisting of two 30 x 30 cm highly refractive fresnel lenses, mounted in a steel frame. Distance between fresnel lenses and strobe lights is variable 5: Adjustable holder for a 0.5 mm nylon line used as size standard Fig. 12: Profiles of salinity, temperature, oxygen and light beam attenuation (LBA) at station 467-92, south of Cabo Verde Islands Fig. 13: Salinity distribution along 35šW between 5°01'S and 4°N from November 2 to 7, 1992 for the upper 1000m of the ocean with a contour interval of 0.1. Fig. 14: TS-curves (potential temperature) of all CTD profiles of the 35°W section for the temperature range 0°to 10°C. Fig. 15: Freon-11 distribution (pmol/kg) at the 44°W section. Fig. 16: lADCP: velocity pattern (u-component, cm/s) of the upper 1000 m at 44°W. Transport calculations for the framed regions are included. Numbers are in Sv, positive is directed east. Fig. 17: lADCP: velocity pattern (cm/s) at the 5°S section a) u-component b) v-component Fig. 18: Temperature distribution from XBT data for the 35°W section for the depth range of the thermocline between 75 and 150 m with an isotherm spacing of 1°C. Fig. 19: Temperature distribution from XBT data between 6°40'N, 44°W and 4°N, 35°W with an isotherm spacing of 1°C. Fig. 20: Pegasus section of the meridional currents at 5°S. Contour interval is 5 cm/s. Northward contours are solid, southward dashed. The stations are indicated with the longer tick marks at the bottom of the plot. Fig. 21: Zonal current profiles at station S6 (approx.1000m water depth). The solid lines are the Pegasus profile (down and up cast) on 8 Nov. 1992. The family of dotted curves are ship ADCP profiles during the 4 hours on station there. The dashed curves are the corresponding Pegasus profile from 24 Oct. During the 4 hours on station, the profile is remarkably constant. 2 weeks earlier, many of the features are the same, but the direction of jets had changed. Fig. 22: VM-ADCP: Velocities along the cruise track for different depth layers. Fig. 23: VM-ADCP: Velocity sections a)along 35°W, u-component b)along 35°W, v-component c)along 44°W, u-component d)along 44°W, v-component Fig. 24: DVS: ship's drift along cruise track Fig. 25: DVS: winds along cruise track Fig. 26a: Three sections of potential temperature and salinity across the shelf break of the Santos Plateau. (For location see Figure 26b). The upper 1000 m are shown. Fig. 26b: Map showing the positions of CTD profiles of 3 sections normal to the shelf break of the Santos Plateau. (For location see Figure 26B). The upper 1000 m are shown. Fig. 27: Vertical profiles of potential temperature near the bottom at the Vema Sill and the northward extention of the Vema Channel, called Vema Canyon. The right curve is shifted by 0.6 K. Both stations were occupied during M 22/4 in December 1992. For locations see Figure 5. Fig. 28: Progressive vector diagrams from (a) the deepest mooring of the heat flux array ACM3 (BE/335) All curves start at the origin, crosses indicate 50 day intervals, numbers depths in m. Fig. 29: Trajectories of selected RAFOS floats launched during M 22/4. Numbers indicate IfM serial number, mean depth (m), and mission length (month). Diamonds indicate sound source positions K1, K2, K3, and K0 (from west to east). Fig. 30: Potential temperature along 30°S. Contour interval 4 - 25°C: 1°C 0 - 4°C: 0,2°C Fig. 31: Salinity-34 along 30°S. Contour interval: 0,05 Fig. 32: Sigma-T along 30°S Contour interval: 0,1 Fig. 33: CO2 partial pressure in surface water and atmosphere along 30°S Fig. 34: Hydrographical and biological distribution pattern at the sea surface from Brazil to 40°W. A) Temperature (lines) and salinity (dashes) B) Quantitative distribution of the total ichthyoplankton of the upper neuston net (log10(n+1)/1000 m2; bar shading indicates the light condition at sample time: white = day, black = night and hatched = dusk/dawn) C)-E) Percentage of zoogeographical ichthyoplankton groups: C) = neritic; D) = tropical, E) = subtropical taxa and subtropical convergence (see text for species) F) Quantitative distribution of Synopia (Gammaridae; log10(n+1)/1000 m2) and their percentage of total Amphipods. G) Distribution pattern of Halobates micans (Gerridae, Insecta, log10(n+1)/1000 m2) Fig. 35: F-11 section on 30°S ------------------------------------------------------- CFC; HELIUM - NEON ISOTOPE DATA DOCUMENTATION CRUISE METEOR 22 WHP A10 The data was aquired by Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Roether Tracer-Ozeanographie FB1 Universitaet Bremen PO.Box. 330 440 28334 Bremen Tel.: 0421/218-3511 / 4221 Fax: 0421/218-7018 email: wroether@physik.uni-bremen.de responsible for measurement and data processing of Helium and Neon data: Christine Rueth Tel: 0421/218-4317 email: crueth@pacific.physik.uni-bremen.de responsible for measurement and data processing of CFC data: Henning Rose Tel: 0421/218-4562 email: hrose@physik.uni-bremen.de General comments: CFC data have been submitted earlier but had wrongly been indicated as being calibrated against SIO scale SIO93 while in reality they had been calibrated against SIO86. This has been corrected in the present version of the data. F113 measurements during this cruise were seriously contaminated through coelution in the chromatograms and had to be eliminated entirely. CCL4 measurements in the earlier version had been raised by 17% to match samples of air concentrations. This correction was based on the wrong SIO scale and has not been applied in the present version of the data set. CCL4 concentrations have been increased by 5% to account for the effect that CCL4 is not entirely extracted from the water samples during the measurement process, as noted in the documentation for the data set submitted earlier. In the beginning of the cruise CFC11 and CFC12 measurements suffered from contamination resulting in large and variable blanks. Low concentrations in the Brasil Basin have to bee regarded with care. A consistency check with other Woce sections further north was used to eliminate obviously bad data points in the Brasil basin. The measurements of CFC-11, CFC-12, CFC-113 and CCL4 have been assigned individual errors (CFC-11ER, CFC-12ER, CFC-113ER and CCL4ER). The overall errors are as follows: - CFC-11 <1% or 0.003 pmol/kg whichever is greater - CFC-12 <1% or 0.003 pmol/kg whichever is greater - CCL4 <2% or 0.011 pmol/kg whichever is greater Quality flags for the CFC measurements are given according to WOCE standards. - 2 acceptable measurement - 3 questionable measurement - 4 bad measurement - 6 mean of replicate samples - 9 sample not drawn - CFC-11 position 1 of quality word - CFC-12 position 2 of quality word - CFC-113 position 3 of quality word - CCL4 position 4 of quality word Helium isotope and neon concentrations have remained unchanged in comparison to the data set submitted earlier. In the data file we enclose storage time (see below). Two different sets of samples were taken: 1. Most samples were taken in the usual manner with pinched- off copper tubes. After the gas extraction in Bremen they were measured in the Laboratory with a special Helium - Neon Isotope Mass Spectrometer. 2. Another set was sampled into glas-pipettes and extracted at sea. The glas ampulles with the extracted gas were then transported back to Bremen for measurement. All samples were calibrated using an air standard (regular air) in the Bremen laboratory. An external standard does not exist. Please note that the Copper tube samples are NOT corrected for tritium decay during storage time! The storage time is given in the data file, so when the tritium data is available, the correction can be carried out. Because of the very low tritium concentrations in the South Atlantic this will not have a large effect on most of the data. In the upper water column we expect corrections in delta 3-He of not more than 0.5% (to be substracted). Below 1000m we do not expect any considerable changes. Data quality: Each sample has been assigned an individual error, but the overall errors are as follows. The relative errors for the measured properties can be given as: - Helium: 0.35 % - Neon: 0.35 % - He3/He4: 0.25 % applies to DelHe3 Quality flags for helium and neon both follow a slightly modified WOCE notation. - 1 sample has been taken but could not be measured - 2 good data value - 3 obviously questionable data value - 4 bad measurement - 5 correction for air contamination in helium and neon measurements necessary - 6 average value from replicate samples - 7 slightly questionable measurement - 8 sample identification uncertain - 9 no sample drawn Helium position 5 of quality word Delhe3 position 6 of quality word Neon position 7 of quality word TROPICAL ATLANTIC CHLOROFLUOROCARBONS PI: Monika Rhein Institut für Meereskunde, 24105 Kiel, Germany now at Institut für Ostseeforschung, 18119 Rostock, Germany email: monika.rhein@io-warnemuende.de, mrhein@ifm.uni-kiel.de CFC-Lab: Martina Elbrächter Institut für Meereskunde, 24105 Kiel, Germany email:melbraechter@ifm.uni-kiel.de Region: Equatorial Atlantic, 10°S - 8°N, 44°W - 30°W Date: October, 23 - November, 15, 1992 Files: meteor222.sum, meteor222.sea SAMPLE COLLECTION AND TECHNIQUE All samples were collected from 10 L Niskin bottles. The bottles had been cleaned prior to the cruise using isopropanol. All 'O' rings and valves as well as the nylon stopcocks (of the syringes) were removed and washed in isopropanol and baked in a vacuum oven for 24 hours. The rubber bands on all bottles were replaced by stainless steel springs. The personnel for all water sampling and handling procedures at the bottles wore one-way gloves to protect the valves from grease. About 100 mL of water were taken from the water bottles with gastight glass syringes (Becton and Dickinson). Then 15-25 mL of the samples were transferred to a purge and trap unit and analyzed on board following the procedures described in Bullister and Weiss [1988]. The CFCs were separated on a packed stainless steel column filled with Porasil C and detected with an Electron Capture Detector (ECD). The carrier gas was ECD pure Nitrogen, which was additionally cleaned by molsieves (13X mesh 80/100). The calibration was done using a standard gas with near air concentrations to convert the ECD signal in concentrations. The CFC values are reported in pmol/kg-1 on the SIO93 scale (R. Weiss, SIO). Figure 1: Accuracy of CFC-12 (o) and CFC-11 (*); replicate samples plotted vs profile number. PERFORMANCE During cruise M22/2, the CFC components CFC-11 and CFC-12 had been sampled on 24 stations along the 44°W-, 35°W-, and 5°S- sections. In total, 1400 analyses were performed, including more than 800 water samples. The survey was dedicated to the circulation of the deep and bottom water masses. In order to get a sufficient vertical resolution in the deep water masses with the available bottle samples, thus measurements were restricted to the water column beneath 700 m depth. Accuracy was checked by replicate measurements and it was found to be 0.004 pmol/kg-1 for CFC-11. Blanks of the measurement system and the syringes are determined by degassing CFC-free water, produced by purging ECD clean Nitrogen permanently through 10 L sea water. The blanks were 0.003 pmol/kg-1 for CFC-11. Calibration curves with 4 points are carried out before and after the water analysis of a station. It is assumed that the efficiency changes linearly in time between the two calibration curves. CFC concentrations are calculated by using the two neighbored calibration points, assuming, that the calibration curve is linear between these points. CFC measurements of the air inside the vessel and especially in the lab were carried out frequently in order to check for contamination. In general, the CFC concentrations in both places were only a few percent higher than in clean air. Clean air measurements were carried out occasionally by sampling air from the ship's compass bridge or forecastle. Figure 2: Temporal evolution of the efficiency of the ECD (mVs/mg standard) for the 0.25 mL sample volume. PROBLEMS On October 26, a short circuit destroyed the interface and the electric actuators of 4 valves. Two of them could be repaired, but not the interface, so that in the following the valves had to be switched manually. The CFC-12 analysis was hindered by an unknown substance with similar retention time as CFC-12, thus making the availability of this data more sporadic. COMMENTS The CFC measurements in the tropical Atlantic made it possible to analyze the development of different water mass characteristics between 10°N to 10°S. Figure 3 shows all CFC-11 concentration measured during the cruise M22/2. At the bottom the concentrations are small caused by the CFC-poor Antarctic Bottom Water (AABW) [Rhein et al., 1998a]. The deepest part of the North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW) exhibits a distinct tracer maximum at about 3800 m depth (Figure 3). This maximum reflects the convective renewal of Denmark Strait Overflow Water (DSOW) [Rhein, 1994; Plähn and Rhein, 1998]. Above this maximum the water column is characterized by CFC-poor water, at about 2600 m depth, the level of the Gibbs Fracture Zone Water (GFZW). The upper maximum was described and analyzed by Rhein et al. [1995] and Rhein et al. [1998b]. These high values indicate a separate water mass in the upper NADW. It presumably is formed in the southern Labrador Sea [Pickart, 1992] rather than being a modified form of the classical Labrador Sea Water (LSW). Figure 3: All CFC-11 concentrations [pmol/kg-1] versus depth. REFERENCES Bullister, J.L. and R.F. Weiss (1988). Determination of CCl3 F and CCl2 F2 in seawater and air. Deep-Sea Res., 35, p. 839{853. Pickart, R.S. (1992). Water mass components of the North Atlantic deep western boundary current. Deep-Sea Res., 39, p. 1553{1572. Plähn, O. and M. Rhein (1998). Measured and modeled CFC distribution of lower North Atlantic Deep Water in the Guiana Basin. J. Geophys. Res., 103, p. 2831{2848. Rhein, M. (1994). The Deep Western Boundary Current: Tracers and velocities. Deep- Sea Res., 41, p. 263{281. Rhein, M., O. Plähn, R. Bayer, L. Stramma, and M. Arnold (1998b). Temporary evolution of the tracer signal in the Deep Western Boundary Current, tropical Atlantic. J. Geophys. Res., 103, p. 15869{15883. Rhein, M., L. Stramma, and G. Krahmann (1998a). The spreading of Antarctic Bottom Water in the tropical Atlantic. Deep-Sea Res., 45, p. 507{527. Rhein, M., L. Stramma, and U. Send (1995). The Atlantic Deep Western Boundary Current: Water masses and transports near the equator. J. Geophys. Res., 100, p. 2441{2457. Figure 4: CFC-11/CFC-12 ratio versus depth; CFC-11 concentrations larger than 0.1 pmol/kg-1 are marked by circles. APPENDIX THE STATION FILE 'METEOR222.SUM' THE BOTTLE FILE 'METEOR222.SEA' INCLUDES: INCLUDES: 1 station number 1 station number 2 year 2 bottle number 3 month 3 depth (dbar) 4 day 4 in-situ temperature (°C) 5 hour: minutes in decimal system 5 salinity (psu) 6 latitude: minutes in decimals 6 CFC-12 (pmol/kg-1) 7 longitude: minutes in decimals 7 CFC-11 (pmol/kg-1) 8 water depth 8 WOCE quality flag for CFC-12 9 CTD depth: depth of CTD profile and CFC-11 TECHNICAL INFORMATION Gas chromatograph Shimadzu GC 14 GC column stainless steel, packed with Porasil C Cooling trap with Porapak T and Porasil C Trap temperatures -30°C, 100°C Column temperate 70°C, isotherm ECD temperature 300°C Electron capture detector Shimadzu Chromatogram analysis Shimadzu Integrator C-R4A Standard gas R. Weiss, SIO Accuracy CFC-11: 0.004 pmol/kg-1 Blanks CFC-11: 0.003 pmol/kg-1 DQE OF CTD & WATER SAMPLE SALINITY AND OXYGEN DATA OF WOCE SECTION A10 (ROBERT MILLARD, 8/18/2000) The WOCE A10 section was collected in the south Atlantic on METEOR Cruise 22 leg 5 along latitude 30 S from South American to the Africa coast starting in late December 1992 through January 1993. The station numbering is out of sequence begins with 620 through 632, shown in *figure 1, followed by stations numbers 1 through 100 collected along 30 degrees South. A chart of beginning station position, created from the summary file of A10, is displayed in the upper panel of *figure 1 with a plot of bottom depth versus station number in the lower panel of *figure 1. CTD stations 620 & 621 are labeled test stations in summary file. A Bottle file data entry appears for station 620 together with CTD observations but not for 621. No 2 dbar CTD cast was found for either station 620 or 621. The first shallow station group, stations 17 through 25, is on the Rio Grande Plateau while the next rise in topography centered on station 55 is associated with the Mid-Atlantic Ridge showing a minimum bottom depth of less than 3000 meters which blocks (except for flow through deep channels) most of the AABW from reaching the Angola Basin to the East. The shallow feature around station 77 is the Walvis Ridge which separates the Angola Basin from the Namibia Abyssal Plain bounded to the East by the African coast. The deep waters of each basin is examined separately because of distinct water mass characteristics. A salinity versus potential temperature plot (*figure 2) shows all water sample file salinities (water sample and CTD up cast) along with the 2 decibar down-profile CTD data from section A10. The salinities are well matched to the bottle salinities to the resolution of the plot. There are several stations with fresh surface salinities with station 70 particularly fresh with a surface salinity less than 30.0 psu. Stations with fresh surface salts are examined later. The deep water is separated into several basins as mentioned. See the lower panel of *figure 1. West of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge the deep waters connect directly to the Antarctic deep waters and presence's of Antarctic Bottom Water (AABW) with a potential temperature for one station less than 0.0°C is seen in *figure 3. *Figure 4 is a deep water potential Temperature versus salinity plot of stations 56 to 75 taken in the Angola Basin, East of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. The profiles show a lack of the cold AABW different water mass influence as the minimum Potential temperature is 1.8°C. *Figure 5 shows the presence's of AABW in the salinity versus pot. temperature of stations 78 to 90, collected on the Namibia Abyssal Plain to the East of the Walvis Ridge. The CTD salinities in the deep water are well matched to bottle salts in *figures 3, 4, and 5 except for a few water sample salinities marked as good "2" in QUALT1 but flagged as questionable in QUALT2. These and are identified on *figure 3 with the associated station numbers (stations 14, 40 and 50). CTD SALINITY A comparison of the up-profile CTD and water sample salinity data in the water sample file (A10.hyd) is shown in *figure 6. The up-cast CTD salinities are pretty well matched to the water sample salinities both overall (upper panel) and below 1000 dbars (center panel) exception for the few water sample salinities noted on *figure 3 (stations 14, 40 & 50) and deepest salinities of station 29. Examining station 29's water sample data with neighboring stations indicates the salinity mismatch to be within the deep salinity variability with potential temperature of surrounding stations (i.e. the bottle salts fall on station 30 & 31 theta/s) as indicated by the theta/s plot of stations 27 through 31 shown in *figure 7. The bottom panel of *figure 6 shows the salinity differences to be well behaved in the vertical. *Figure 8 shows four histograms of salinity difference (CTD-WS) in various deep intervals. Below 1000 dbars the histograms show a constant standard deviation of salt difference of 0.003 psu and mean differences of less than 0.001 psu. The down-profile CTD salinity difference is plotted in *figures 9 a, b, & c using interpolation at the pressure of the up-profile water sample bottles. Like the up cast CTD salinities, the down cast shows no systematic differences with station but a suggestion that the CTD salinity reads lower than the water sample salts at depths less than 2500 dbars. *Figure 10 are four histograms of interpolated down-profile CTD salinity minus bottle salt broken up into 1500 dbar pressure intervals below 1000 dbars. Below 1000 dbars, this summary shows a scatter of from 0.004 (deep) to 0.006 (shallower) psu with mean differences that are within 0.001 psu below 3000 dbars but is -0.0028 psu for pressure intervals between 1000 and 3000 dbars and -0.004 psu from 1000 dbars to the surface. There seems to be mismatch between the down and up salinity of the CTD sensors (form either C, T or P) shallower than 3000 decibars with the salinity fresher than bottle salts. There are a few stations with low surface salinities mentioned earlier. Using a surface salinity (0 to 2 decibar) edit criteria of ds/dp for the first interval less than the 5*ds/dp of the third interval and the |ds/dp| < 0.5 psu/dbar, the eight stations plotted in *figure 11 were flagged. Three stations, 45, 70 and 88, have surface (2 dbars) salinity values less than 34.0 psu while the salt values at 4 dbars are between 2.4 and 6.3 psu higher. CTD OXYGEN An oxygen versus potential temperature plot shown in *figure 12 has all of the good water sample file bottle oxygen data along with the 2 decibar down-profile CTD data from section A10. Note, there are no CTD oxygen data in the water sample file. The down profile CTD oxygen is not as well matched to the bottle oxygen data and even in the coarse scale plotted the CTD oxygen appears to be greater than the bottle oxygen. There is one station (91) which has an excessively high surface oxygen of over 408 micromoles/kg in the upper two pressure intervals. The deep oxygen was examined versus potential temperature for the three basins just as it was earlier for salinity. All three deep water oxygen plots indicate that the CTD oxygen is greater than the water sample value by from 6 to 7 micromoles/kg. Only the oxygen versus potential temperature plot for the Nambia Abyssal Plain is shown in *figure 13. The down-profile CTD oxygen difference with water samples is plotted in *figures 14 a, b, & c using an interpolation at the pressure of the up- profile water samples. The down cast difference shows a clear offset between the CTD oxygen and bottle values in all three plots but particularly in the expanded scales of *figures 14b and c. The mean difference for all stations and depths is 6.2 micromoles/kg and appears to effect all stations and depths more or less equally. Suggestion that the CTD salinity reads lower than the water sample salts at depths less than 2500 dbars. *Figure 15 shows four histograms of oxygen difference (CTD-WS) for various deep intervals. The mean oxygen difference varies by 20 percent between the various pressure intervals represented by the histograms. There are systematic oxygen differences effecting all CTD oxygen values. Subtracting a constant equal to roughly 6.2 Umoles/kg from all CTD oxygen values will bring the CTD oxygen into much closer agreement with water samples. Station 91 CTD oxygen needs to be edited in the upper 2 pressure bins. STABILITY The stability of the CTD data is checked by looking at the first differences of the potential density anomaly values of the 2 decibar data within a station. Unstable density anomaly differences (i.e. denser above lighter) that exceed -0.0075 kg/dbar and a more stringent - 0.005 kg/dbar are plotted in *figure 15. The table below indicating stations with observations failing the -0.0075 kg/dbar criteria with additional values failing -0.005 kg/dbars following. A list of stations with density inversions repeats the data shown in *figure 15. Station Dsg/dp Pres. Salt Dt/dp dsg/dp < -0.0075 kg/dbar 630 -0.09324 100.0 36.5010 -0.03975 630 -0.01719 102.0 36.4202 -0.05025 630 -0.01823 112.0 36.3577 -0.02005 5 -0.00774 4.0 36.1915 0.01000 12 -0.01445 4.0 36.2132 0.02005 15 -0.00767 4.0 35.9952 0.00885 18 -0.00902 4.0 36.1430 0.01155 21 -0.01399 4.0 36.1247 0.02365 22 -0.00910 4.0 36.2692 0.01305 25 -0.00945 40.0 36.3711 -0.12160 33 -0.00815 8.0 35.8674 0.03555 34 -0.00787 10.0 35.7769 0.01460 39 -0.01156 4.0 35.6508 0.01360 48 -0.03903 14.0 35.5885 0.08415 55 -0.02060 4.0 35.8051 0.06110 56 -0.01228 4.0 36.1198 0.01490 57 -0.01259 4.0 36.0788 0.01940 61 -0.00979 4.0 35.7220 0.02285 76 -0.02018 6.0 35.9259 0.07285 79 -0.00753 10.0 35.8027 0.02425 84 -0.01792 4.0 35.6524 0.00610 90 -0.06800 4.0 35.4913 0.00350 92 -0.01108 4.0 35.6462 0.01750 623 -0.00568 176.0 35.4899 -0.03745 630 -0.00547 114.0 36.3193 -0.03435 5 -0.00631 378.0 35.7421 -0.02770 8 -0.00590 4.0 36.2180 0.00705 49 -0.00509 4.0 35.7092 0.00700 55 -0.00556 634.0 34.5255 -0.02455 81 -0.00520 222.0 35.3172 -0.03020 82 -0.00709 4.0 35.7995 0.00955 WATER SAMPLE SALINITY CHECKS: Water sample salinity observations were found for only approximately 1/3 of the total water sample observations. The following edit criteria comparing CTD and water sample salinity found the following 15 questionable CTD or water sample salinity, both flagged "3". Notice that the deep water edit criteria (0.01) was not sensitive enough to identify questionable salinities of station 29. |ds| > 0.2 psu for pressure <=500 decibars; |ds| > 0.02 psu for pressure >500 and <= 1500 decibars; |ds| > 0.01 psu for pressure > 1500 decibars; A list of bottle file observations with the QUALT2 salinity quality flags differing from those of the PI QUALT1 are given in file = A10DQE.chg . *Figure number with file names (____. jpg) and figure caption 1) *fig01_a10.jpg Plot of annotated beginning station positions from summary file with coastline (upper) and plot of bottom depth (lower). 2) *fig02_a10.jpg Overall plot of Salinity versus Potential temperature for all down profile 2-decibar CTD salinities plus QUAL1 "good bottle file water sample (+) and CTD (o). 3) *fig03_a10.jpg Deep water plot of Salinity versus Potential temperature West of Mid- Atlantic ridge for all down profile 2-decibar CTD salinities plus QUAL1 "good bottle file water sample (+) and CTD (o). 4) *fig04_a10.jpg Deep water plot of Salinity versus Potential temperature in Angola Basin (East of Mid-Atlantic Ridge) for all down profile 2-decibar CTD salinities plus QUAL1 "good bottle file water sample (+) and CTD (o). 5) *fig05_a10.jpg Deep water plot of Salinity versus Potential temperature on Nambia Abyssal Plain for all down profile 2-decibar CTD salinities plus QUAL1 "good bottle file water sample (+) and CTD (o). 6) *fig06_a10.jpg 3 Plot panels of up cast salinity differences Ds = (CTD-WS) psu versus station number (a) all pressures (b) below 1000 dbars and (c) versus pressure. 7) *fig07_a10.jpg 3 Plot panels of downcast salinity differences Ds = (CTD-WS) psu versus station number (a) all pressures (b) below 1000 dbars and (c) versus pressure. 8) *fig08_a10.jpg 4 histogram panels of up cast salinity differences Ds = (CTD-WS) psu for various pressure intervals as labeled. 9) *fig09_a10.jpg 4 histogram panels of downcast salinity differences Ds=(CTD-WS) psu for various pressure intervals as labeled. Note a much higher standard deviation in 2 shallowest histogram panels compared to up cast. 10) *fig10_a10.jpg Deep water plot of Salinity versus Potential temperature for stations 27 through 31 showing CTD station 29 (red) mismatch to water sample (o) data. 11) *fig11_a10.jpg Plot of salinity versus pressure for upper 100 dbars of stations with questionable surface CTD salinity observations. 12) *fig12_a10.jpg Overall plot of oxygen versus Potential temperature for down profile 2- decibar CTD oxygen plus QUAL1 "good bottle file water sample (+). Note there is no CTD oxygen data in water sample file. 13) *fig13_a10.jpg Deep water plot of oxygen versus Potential temperature for Nambia Abyssal Plain below 2.5 degrees C for down profile 2-dbar CTD oxygen plus QUAL1 "good bottle file water sample (+). 14) *fig14_a10.jpg 3 Plot panels of down cast oxygen differences Dox=(CTD-WS) in Umol/) (CTD down cast oxygen observations are interpolated at bottle pressures) versus station number (a) all pressures (b) below 1000 dbars and (c) versus pressure. 15) *fig15_a10.jpg 4 histogram panels of down cast oxygen differences Dox=(CTD-WS) in Umol/kg for various pressure intervals as labeled. CTD down cast oxygen observations are interpolated at bottle pressures. 16) *fig16_a10.jpg A plot of pressure versus station indicating unstable values of density change with pressure: a) x exceeding -0.005 kg/M3/dbar b) * exceeding -0.0075 kg/M3/dbar * All figures shown in PDF file. DQE OF DISSOLVED OXYGEN AND NUTRIENTS, WOCE A10 (Joe C. Jennings, Jr. and Louis I. Gordon, 11/7/00) OVERALL IMPRESSIONS: The A10 section (METEOR Cruise 22, Leg 5) was a zonal transect of the South Atlantic at ca 30° South. Stations 621 - 632 were occupied at the end of December 1992, with station numbering changing to 1 - 100 commencing in January 1993. The direction of the Transect was West to East. CTD oxygen was not reported and so could not be used in evaluating the bottle oxygen data. NO3+ NO2 (N+N) was reported, but not a separate NO2 determination. For most of the water column, the conversion to NO3 by subtracting NO2 from N+N would be negligible, but near the bottom of the mixed layer, NO2 concentrations significantly different from zero could be expected. As received from the WHPO (and data originator?), the Q1 quality bytes for N+N were all assigned as "9" which indicates that the parameter was not sampled. We have changed the Q1 quality words for all reported N+N values to "2". The A10 section has a number of noisy oxygen samples, which could have been caused by an inexperienced sampler(s). Overall, the nutrient data are quite good, with few problems. There are several stations at which it appears that a mis-assignment of bottle depths may have occurred. This affects only the oxygen data in some cases, only the nutrient data in others, and both in still others. At these stations, the vertical profiles and parameter/theta relationships appear offset from those at neighboring stations. Rather than a random offset caused by instrumentation problems, the data appear to be shifted and would agree well with other stations if the values were assigned to the bottle above or below. This could be caused by real mal-functions of the CTD rosette (such as double trips) or by record keeping or file merging errors. We would recommend that the data originators reexamine their records to see if the data may indeed have been shifted. COMPARISONS WITH OTHER WOCE CRUISES: The A10 section crosses four other recent WOCE sections that we have examined. We compared vertical profiles and property/theta plots from the three stations in each section closest to the intersection point. A brief summary of these comparisons follows here. A10/A13: A13 crosses the A10 section at ca. 10°E, 30°S in the eastern Cape basin. This is a highly dynamic region because of the Agulhas Current and it's retroflection zone, so we have confined our comparisons to the deep water (3000 - 5000 m) where the T/S properties of the two cruises were indistinguishable. There is good agreement between the dissolved oxygen and silicate data from the two cruises, but the nitrate and phosphate data from A10 are higher than on A13. At temperatures below 2°C, the A10 stations are ca. 1.5 µM/kg higher in nitrate and 0.08 µM/kg lower in phosphate than the A13 stations. There is also more noise (or variability) in the A13 data. A10/A14: The A14 and A10 nutrient and oxygen data largely overlap. Below 2500 m, the A14 nitrate and phosphate data is slightly lower than the A10 data. The A14 nitrate is ca 0.5 - 0.7 µM/Kg lower than the A10 nitrate, while the phosphate is ca 0.04 - 0.08 µM/Kg lower. There are no clear differences in the deep silicates or oxygen. A14 stations 75 and 77 have slightly (0.6 µM/Kg) higher silicates than the A10 stations, but A14 stations 76 and 78 agree well with the A10 data. A10/A15: The A15 and A10 data sets appear to agree well. Below about 3500 m, the A15 phosphate and nitrate fall within the "envelope" of the A10 data. Dissolved oxygen and silicate mostly overlap although the oxygen at A10 station 46 is higher by ca. 2 - 4 µM/kg below 3500 m than at the other stations and the silicate is lower by 5 - 8 µM/kg. A15 station 104 has higher oxygen and lower nutrients at the oxygen maximum/nutrient minimum (2000 m - 3000 m) than do the other stations at the crossing, but the salinity at this station is also higher in this depth range so these differences are probably real. A10/A17: These two cruises intersect near the Rio Grande Rise, which separates the Brazil and Argentine basins. There is good overlap of salinity between 2000 and ca. 3300 m. A10 nitrate and phosphate are mostly higher (1.4 µM and 0.07 µM respectively) than the A17 values in this depth interval and the oxygen data are a little higher as well, but the silicate overlap is good. In the bottom waters, the nutrient concentrations at the more southerly A17 stations all increase and become higher than the A10 concentrations. This is probably a real and due to the influence of the Argentine Basin waters, but the offset at mid- depths remains. COMMENTS ON SPECIFIC STATIONS: A listing of stations at which specific bottle data seems to be questionable is attached. The "Q2" data quality flags for these data have been set to 3. Cruise A10 : 06MT22/5 Nutrient and Oxygen DQE: "questionable" flags by Gordon/Jennings (OSU) STATION BOTTLE PRESSURE O2 SI NO3 PO4 COMMENTS 630 316 300 High 632 307 1799 High 3 311 1900 Low Odd Shift in O2. 10 320 399 High High High 10 315 1198 High 11 316 2501 Low 11 312 3505 Low 13 311 2250 High 20 318 100 * * * * * 305-318 Nutrients and O2 shifted by one bottle? 20 317 150 * * * * Looks fine if one depth lower. 20 316 200 * * * * 20 315 300 * * * * 20 314 399 * * * * 20 313 499 * * * * 20 312 599 * * * * 20 311 799 * * * * 20 310 999 * * * * 20 309 1200 * * * * 20 308 1400 * * * * 20 307 1601 * * * * 20 306 1800 * * * * 20 305 2001 * * * * 26 318 100 Low 26 311 700 Low No Nutrient shift. 26 309 1200 Low 302-311 All O2 shifted one depth too shallow. 26 308 1400 High 26 307 1600 High 26 306 1803 High 26 305 2000 High 26 304 2250 High 26 302 2802 High 30 312 1801 High 36 206 102 Low Low Low 201-206 Nutrients look too low, probably shifted. 36 205 151 Low Low Low 201-206 Nutrients look too low, probably shifted. 36 204 201 Low Low Low 36 203 299 Low Low Low 36 202 402 Low Low Low 36 201 505 Low Low Low 36 319 848 * * 310-319 Oxygens look one bottle too deep. 36 318 998 * 36 317 1194 * 36 316 1397 * 36 312 1600 * 36 311 1798 * 36 310 1998 * 40 209 300 High O2 looks high vs. Z and Theta 40 205 1199 High 40 204 1399 High 40 203 1598 Low 40 323 1800 Low 40 202 1800 Low 40 201 2004 Low 41 207 202 Low 41 206 301 * * * 201-206 All Nutrients off by one bottle. 41 205 401 * * * 41 204 500 * * * 41 203 601 * * * 41 202 701 * * * 41 201 851 * * * 41 319 1199 * * 305-319 All O2s look off by one bottle. If shifted 41 318 1399 * down the profiles would agree well. 41 317 1600 * 41 316 1800 * 41 315 2000 * 41 314 2251 * 41 313 2502 * 41 312 2752 * 41 311 3003 * 41 310 3252 * 41 309 3502 Low O2 too low, even if bottle depths were shifted. 41 308 3755 * 41 307 4006 * 41 306 4255 * 41 305 4506 * 44 323 10 Low 44 320 849 * * 305-320 O2 look shifted one bottle too shallow. 44 319 1000 * * 305-320 O2 look shifted one bottle too shallow. 44 318 1199 * 44 317 1398 * 44 316 1600 * 44 315 1800 * 44 314 2001 * 44 313 2251 * 44 312 2501 * 44 311 2752 * 44 310 3003 * 44 309 3252 Low Low beyond shift noted above. 44 308 3504 * 44 307 3754 * 44 306 4003 * 44 305 4256 * 46 205 401 High 46 206 302 High 46 313 2250 Low 48 307 3253 Low 50 317 900 High 50 307 2852 High 50 302 3653 High 52 306 2250 Low High High High 53 319 601 Low Low Low 55 312 602 Low Y 58 314 849 Low 58 313 999 High 60 316 897 Low 61 304 3508 High 62 315 1200 High 63 307 3002 High 67 311 2251 High 70 204 252 Low 70 304 4017 High 74 322 50 Low 74 304 2754 High 78 306 3502 * * Poor duplicates, O2 above and below looks shifted. 78 307 3502 * 81 306 4255 Low 83 314 2502 Low 86 320 1198 High 89 202 501 Low 93 204 504 Low WHPO-SIO DATA PROCESSING NOTES Date Contact Data Type Data Status Summary -------- ---------- -------------- ----------------------------------------- 04/03/97 Klein CFCs/He Data are Final 09/04/97 Klein CFCs Final Data Submitted 09/25/97 Klein CFCs/He/Ne Submitted; Corrected CFC calibration I submitted also today CFC, helium and neon isotope measurements for section a10 again. The file was named WHPA10.dat and the corresponding documentation is given in whpa10tr.txt. We have noticed that the CFC measurements for this cruise were calibrated against the wrong SIO scale and the data submitted today have been corrected for this error. I did submit helium and neon measurements as well because I was not certain you had received those. The are identical to the data submitted earlier. 01/27/98 Müller CTD/BTL/SUM Submitted for DQE 01/29/98 Müller CTD/O/NUTs Preliminary, Public you may qualify the CTD, oxygen and nutrient data of A10 as 'preliminary' and 'public'. For the tracers including Helium, Neon etc ask Wolfgang Roether; for CO2 plse ask Doug Wallace. 02/27/98 Onken CTD/BTL/SUM Data Testing SUM/CTD: no errors SEA: major errors: see note 06MT22/5 A10 Onken/Müller /Putzka One section: A10 (stations 1-100) plus test stations 622-632 at start Data status: proprietary -------------------------- sum: no errors detected -------------------------- sea: depths out of sequencing and pressure inversions on 89 stations. Many duplicate depths. Run seaorder before gridding Major problem with quality flags in the hy2 file. The block of flags from NITRAT to TRITUM is shifted to the right by one, and NITRAT is flagged 9 throughout although there are data. I suspect that there shouldn't be a flag for TRITER (to be consistent with the other ER columns), and that someone has forced an extra quality flag to match the number of **** columns. Temporary fix in order to grid NITRAT, CFC-11, CFC-12, CFC113, CCL4 and TRITUM: add a ******* under THETA and delete a ******* under PH After doing this, found no CFC113 or TRITUM points to grid. -------------------------- ctd: no errors detected Date Contact Data Type Data Status Summary -------- ---------- -------------- ----------------------------------------- 03/06/98 Holfort unspecified Data Update I was given notice that the previously submitted bottle file of WOCE section A10 had an error (additional copies of some data cycles). I transferred a corrected bottle file to 132.239.92.151. 07/08/98 Kozyr BTL Update Needed bad flags, missing data a10_sea.txt file I found some quality flags problems for CFC-11 and CFC-12 (station # 14). There are some flags "4" along with missing data. 07/08/98 Kozyr CO2 Final Data Submitted File was received 1998.07.08. Data appears to be the original CO2 data. Could not determine who sent the data. Path is atlantic/a10/original/1998.07.08_C02_A10. 08/11/98 Müller CTD/O/NUTs Website Updated Status changed to Public 09/15/98 Müller CTD/O/NUTs Website Updated Status changed to Public CTD, oxygen and nutrients are accessible at the WHPO; they are public although not yet evaluated by the WHPO. - T.J. Müller 10/13/98 Sutherland NO2+NO3 Update Needed quality flags for N03+N0 the quality flag for N03+N02 on line A10 is always 9 even when there is a value there. Again we will have to contact the PI for corrected information. 06/09/99 Klein TRITUM Not yet Submitted "I have the tritium data ready & will submit them soon" 12/09/99 Klein CFCs Data are Public I am submitting today the whole tracer data set for a10 again. The tritium data are submitted for the first time, helium and neon data are the same as submitted 9/97 but the delhe3 data are slightly different due to the tritium correction applied. The helium, delhe and neon quality flags of the data set submitted in 9/97 did not follow strictly the woce standard, I have corrected this in the present version. I am also submitting the CFC data again to give you a complete tracer data set. The CFC data have also been submitted before in 9/97 and CFC-11 and CFC-12 remain unchanged. The only change is for CCl4 which got a lower efficiency correction now compared to the data set submitted in 9/97. All data (including the tritium data submitted now) can be public. Date Contact Data Type Data Status Summary -------- ---------- -------------- ----------------------------------------- 12/09/99 Key CO2 Data Update needed The problem is a cast inconsistency between the WHPO files and those created by Alex for NDP-066. Additionally, there is disagreement between the WHPO sum and hyd files with respect to cast numbering. 12/13/99 Müller CTD/SUM Update Needed; Numbering problems. I received the below msg of Robert Key while I'm working in Brazil for a week. It concerns with a problem that arose earlier with A9, and may arise with A8, too. The problem maybe identified as Robert Key suspected: On all 3 sections A9, A10 and A8, the Kiel CTD group on-board counted casts increasingly, starting with 1 and ending with some high number. All other groups on-board were asked to keep these cast numbers for identification. To my knowledge, and J. Holfort may confirm this, the cast numbers as created on-board have been used in the CTD and SUM files we sent to the WHPO. Later (I do not exactly remember when) I got to know that someone at the WHPO changed the cast numbers in the SUM and CTD files to start with 1 for each station (as it is usual for the rest of the world). However, changing the cast numbers in the CTD and SUM files will cause problems with the rosette file as it will be completed with additional data flowing in. It seems to me that this is the problem the WHPO now is facing. The way out of it would be as recommended by Robert Key: DO NOT CHANGE CAST NUMBERS BUT KEEP THEM KEEP THEM AS THEY ARE SENT IN BY THE PIs (besides obvious mistakes). To solve the problem, you may have to reconstruct the original cast numbers from the original SUM and CTD files as they were sent in by the PIs. Juergen Holfort who has sent the CTD, SUM and part of the HYD files for A8, A9 and A10, and myself will assist if necessary. 02/14/00 Kozyr TCARBN/ALKALI Final (DQE'd) Data Submitted I've just put a total of 13 files [carbon data measured in Indian (6 files) and Atlantic (7 files) oceans] to the WHPO ftp area. Please let me know if you get data okay. 05/09/00 Müller CTD/BTL/TRACER Data are Public Again, I would like to declare all CTD and all bottle data including the tracer-data of the WHP one-time cruises A9/M15-3, A10/M22-5 and A8/M28-1 as ,public'. This has been done several times earlier, and I hope that by now this information will flow into your files. Also please note, all CTD-data from repeat hydrography cruises / mooring cruises with chief scientists / PIs T.J. Müller , W. Zenk, and / or O. Boebel / C. Schmid are ,public'. Viel Glueck -- Thomas J. Muller (speaking also for G. Siedler/M15-3; R. Onken/M22-5 and W. Roether/Tracers) Date Contact Data Type Data Status Summary -------- ---------- -------------- ----------------------------------------- 05/25/00 Klein CFCs BTL File Update Needed OK to eliminate cfc113 column I finally checked the encrypted a10 data set you send me against the tracer data sets we have submitted. As you correctly noted the CFC11 and CFC12 data in the file are not identical with the final tracer data version I submitted in 1999, although I had indicated that these two species should not have been different from the data I submitted in 1997. The data in the file are definitely not the CFC data I have submitted in 1997, it seems to me that the 1997 file has never been merged at all, and that the data you have in the file are most probably the oldest version possible, most likely a ship version with none of the later checks and calibrations applied. It is rather disturbing that such old versions of data are made available at the web site and none of later updates has been included. I would advise you to merge all the CFC data again from the final file I send you. Please remember that CFC113 is set to dummy data for all measurements because the analysis was not successful. If you want to delete the column from the bottle data file it is fine with us. You also have to merge the tritium data and the tritium- corrected delhe3 data. Helium and neon in your file are identical (within the number of digits) with the final file. 05/31/00 Bartolacci CFCs Data Update The easiest solution at this point is to merge ALL the values you stated below into our current bottle file. If this is satisfactory to you, I will go ahead and do so. I will also edit out the CFC-113 column. 06/06/00 Bartolacci TRITUM Data Update erroneous tritium value line 3404 changed from -8.753 to -9.000 As per Birgit Klein, I have edited the erroneous tritium value on line 3404 and changed it from -8.753 to -9.000, and left the duplicate lines in the file as well. 06/06/00 Bartolacci CFCs/He/Tr Data Update See note to Birgit Klein: I'm done merging all the new tracer data into our current bottle file, and it is up on our website, replacing the old masked bottle file. Just to confirm: I found 11 duplicate station/cast/bottle number combinations. The duplicates didn't have any new data in them to be merged, but they were left in the current bottle file. Also, please take a look on line 3404 in the tritium column of our bottle file. This value seems erroneous, but I'm not too familiar with tritium. It was from the current version of tracer data you sent us. Please let me know if this value needs correcting. The following were merged into A10. The notes on merging are contained in the file called 00_README which is in the A10 "original" directory. Thanks-Danie CFC-11/12, CCL4, TRITUM, TRITER, DELHE3, DELHER Date Contact Data Type Data Status Summary -------- ---------- -------------- ----------------------------------------- 06/08/00 Diggs Cruise ID Chief Scientist is Müller /IfMK 06/08/00 Bartolacci TRITUM Website Updated The following information should be filed for A10. I have edited the erroneous tritium value in the file and changed the date/name stamp. Also left all duplicate lines in the file as per Birgit's email. 06/08/00 Klein TRITUM Update Needed Tritium value should be replaced with -9.000, duplicate lines Many thanks for merging the tracer data into the a10 file. You have done a very thorough job. Thanks for pointing out that erroneous tritium data value on line 3404. You are right the value is wrong and should be replaced by -9.000. It is always good if somebody independent looks at the data and is able to find errors. You are also right about the duplicate lines, I noted that while I was merging the data, I have no clue what is the meaning behind this. 07/12/00 Huynh DOC Website Updated pdf, txt versions online cruise track loads extremely slowly, needs to be resaved as gif 08/18/00 Millard CTD DQE Report Submitted Water sample salinity observations were found for only approximately 1/3 of the total water sample observations. The following edit criteria comparing CTD and water sample salinity found the following 15 questionable CTD or water sample salinity, both flagged "3". Notice that the deep water edit criteria (0.01) was not sensitive enough to identify questionable salinities of station 29. |ds| > 0.2 psu for pressure <=500 decibars; |ds| > 0.02 psu for pressure >500 and <= 1500 decibars; |ds| > 0.01 psu for pressure > 1500 decibars; 09/19/00 Huynh DOC Website Updated ctd DQE report added to pdf & txt files online 11/07/00 Jennings NUTs/OXY DQE Report Submitted Date Contact Data Type Data Status Summary -------- ---------- -------------- ----------------------------------------- 11/17/00 Huynh DOC Website Updated NUTs/OXY DQE doc added to pdf, txt versions online 11/21/00 Uribe SUM Submitted Files were found in incoming directory under whp_reports. This directory was zipped, files were separated and placed under proper cruise. All of them are sumfiles. 03/21/01 Uribe CTD/BTL/SUM Website Updated; Expocodes updated Expocodes for bottle and sum were modified. Expocodes in all ctd files have been edited to match the underscored expocode in the sum and bottle files. New files were zipped and replaced existing ctd files online. Old files were moved to original directory. 01/31/02 Uribe BTL Website Updated Exchange File Added, Bottle has been converted to exchange and put online. Cast types BIO in the sumfile were changed to ROS for the purpose of the conversion. Data was checked with JOA with not apparent errors. 02/01/02 Uribe CTD Update Needed; CTD/SUM CASTNOs don't match CTD & SUM CASTNOs. don't match CTD could not be converted to exchange because of a cast number mismatch with the sumfile. The cast number values in the CTD files are sequentially increasing and do not match the sumfile. The CTD zip was replaced with a modified one that has an additional Number of Observations column with -9 values and an underscore in DEG_C. 03/20/02 Bartolacci CTD Update Needed; CTD/SUM CASTNOs don't match CTD station files have sequentially increasing cast numbers over all stations, that do not match those cast numbers contained in the summary file. No CTD exchange files have been generated at this time due to this problem. 07/17/02 Uribe CTD Website Updated errors corrected CTD converted to exchange, errors corrected, CTD files had mismatching dates and cast values. The CTD dates indicated only one year 1991 when sumfile indicated the cruise took place 1992-1993, it was therefor determined that the CTD's had wrong dates and the error was corrected. Station numbers 622 - 632 were taken at the end of 1992 and Stations 1-100 in 1993. Cast values in the CTD's were made to match the sumfile. For a complete list of these please see the README in the original directory. CTD were converted to exchange and put online. NetCDF files were made accordingly. Date Contact Data Type Data Status Summary -------- ---------- -------------- ----------------------------------------- 08/20/02 Bartolacci CO2/TRITUM/C14 Merging Notes Bottle file was obtained from parent A10 directory. C14 file was obtained from original/A10_C14_HY.TXT Carbon data file was obtained from original/2002_Kozyr_CARBON/ a10hy_kozyr.txt Tritium file was obtained from original/2002_Klein_ data/A10hy.txt Used mrgsea to merge all files. C14: DELC14 column had -9.0 for missing data (corresponding flags were 9). Because delc14 can range to -300, these missing values were edited to -999.0 in the merged file. 11 duplicate station/cast combinations were not merged. TR: Both TRITIUM and TRITER columns had flags associated with them. Both flags were merged. 11 duplicate station/cast combinations were not merged. CO2: Both TCARBN and ALKALI columns had -999.0 as missing values. these missing values were merged into new bottle file. It appears that only ALKALI data was new (TCARBN values appeared to be identical to those already in file) however both parameters were merged. 1816 samples were not merged into existing bottle file. These samples were associated with station/cast combinations that were not present in the WOCE bottle file and are listed in the file unusedCO2.txt. It is unclear at this time if the sample numbers were misslabled or simply extra samples not included in the original WOCE bottle file. Final merged bottle file outputC14_TR_CO2.txt was renamed a10hy.txt. Date/name stamp were added. Ran wocecvt with only press inversion warnings. replaced current online file with newly merged file. moved previous file to original directory and renamed. 08/20/02 Uribe CTD Website Updated Header corrected Original CTD had a mislabeled element in the header that was causing code to break. Problem was fixed and new files were created. 08/21/02 Bartolacci BTL Website Updated Header error fixed The WOCE bottle file header for delO18 has been edited from O16/O16 to O18/O16. Exchange, NetCDF and inventory files were recreated by KJU. this error was present in the original WOCE bottle file. 04/17/03 Anderson BTL New exchange file created, online Made new exchange file w/ alkalinities re A. Kozyr's e-mail. April 17, 2003 Notes for a10: WHP line a10, EXPOCODE 06MT22_5 Made new exchange file re Alex Kozyr's e-mail. Had to make a temporary change in the .sum file in order to make it work. Changed the BIO designation to ROS (the Data History indicates that this was also done to get the CTD exchange files to work). Alkalinities are there now. - S. Anderson 08/19/03 Kappa DOC updated cruise documentation Added Monica Rhein's CFC report Updated WHPO-SIO summary page (1) Added station tracks for a10 (leg 5) and ar04 (leg 2) Added station geographic boundaries for leg 2 Added chief scientists for legs 2, 3 & 4 Added cruise dates for legs 2, 3 & 4 Added ports of call legs 2, 3 & 4 Added drifter & mooring counts for legs 3, 4 & 5 Changed text color for PDF links to red Added these WHPO-SIO data processing notes