A. Cruise Narrative: S03 and S04I A.1. Highlights WHP Cruise Summary Information WOCE line designation S03 and S04I Expedition designation (ExpoCode) 09AR9404_1 Chief scientist and affiliation Steve Rintoul/CSIRO* Ship RSV Aurora Australis Cruise dates 1994.DEC.13 to 1995.FEB.02 Ports of call Casey Number of stations 107 43° 59.79' S Geographic boundaries S03 139° 47.95' E 155° 19.95' E 66° 36.84' S 57° 30.52' S S04I 109° 54.21' E 162° 15.49' E 66° 15.84' S Floats and drifters deployed 0 Moorings deployed or recovered 4 current meter moorings Authors MARK ROSENBERG, RUTH ERIKSEN, STEVE BELL, STEVE RINTOUL -------------------------------------------------------------------------- *CSIRO Division of Marine Research tel: 61-3-6232-5393 PO Box 1538 fax: 61-3-6232-5123 Hobart TAS 7001 AUSTRALIA internet: rintoul@marine.csiro.au WHP Cruise and Data Information Cruise Summary Information Hydrographic Measurements Description of scientific program CTD general CTD pressure Geographic boundaries of the survey CTD temperature Cruise track (figure) CTD conductivity/salinity Description of stations CTD dissolved oxygen Description of parameters sampled Bottle: Bottle depth distributions (figure) Salinity Floats and drifters deployed Oxygen Moorings deployed or recovered Nutrients CFCs Principal Investigators for all measurements Helium Cruise Participants Tritium Radiocarbon Problems and goals not achieved CO2 system parameters Other incidents of note Other parameters Underway Data Information DQE Reports Navigation CTD Bathymetry S/O2/nutrients Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP) CFCs Thermosalinograph and related measurements 14C XBT and/or XCTD Meteorological observations Atmospheric chemistry data References Acknowledgments Data Status Notes N.B. This Report was originally published as: AURORA AUSTRALIS MARINE SCIENCE CRUISE AU9404 OCEANOGRAPHIC FIELD MEASUREMENTS AND ANALYSIS By the Cooperative Research Centre for the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Environment (ANTARCTIC CRC) RESEARCH REPORT NO. 8 ISBN: 0 642 25469 9 ISSN: 1320-730X JULY, 1996 With the exceptions of: …Arnold Mantyla's Bottle Data Quality Evaluation …John Bullister's CFC-11 and CFC-12 Report …Robert Key's AMS C14 Report …the WHPO Data Processing Notes Author's original WOCE line numbers (S4 and SR3) were changed to S04I and S03 as established at the WOCE Data Products Committee Meeting, April 2000. ABSTRACT Oceanographic measurements were conducted along WOCE Southern Ocean meridional section SR3 between Tasmania and Antarctica, and along the part of WOCE Southern Ocean zonal section S4 lying between approximately 110 and 162oE, from December 1994 to February 1995. An array of 4 current meter moorings at approximately 51oS in the vicinity of the SR3 line was successfully recovered. A total of 107 CTD vertical profile stations were taken, most to near bottom. Over 2380 Niskin bottle water samples were collected for the measurement of salinity, dissolved oxygen, nutrients, chlorofluorocarbons, helium, tritium, dissolved inorganic carbon, alkalinity, carbon isotopes, dissolved organic carbon, dimethyl sulphide/dimethyl sulphoniopropionate, iodate/iodide, oxygen 18, primary productivity, and biological parameters, using a 24 bottle rosette sampler. Near surface current data were collected using a ship mounted ADCP. Measurement and data processing techniques are summarised, and a summary of the data is presented in graphical and tabular form. 1. INTRODUCTION Marine science cruise AU9404, the third oceanographic cruise of the Cooperative Research Centre for the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Environment (Antarctic CRC), was conducted aboard the Australian Antarctic Division vessel RSV Aurora Australis from December 1994 to February 1995. The major constituent of the cruise was the collection of oceanographic data relevant to the Australian Southern Ocean WOCE Hydrographic Program, along WOCE sections S4 (traversed west to east) and SR3 (traversed south to north) (Figure 1). The primary scientific of this program are summarised in Rosenberg et al. (1995a). Section SR3 was occupied three times previously, in the spring of 1991 (Rintoul and Bullister, submitted), in the autumn of 1993 (Rosenberg et al., 1995a), and in the summer of 1993/94 (Rosenberg et al., 1995b). Zonal section S4 represents a circumnavigation of the globe in the Southern Ocean, with the various parts to be completed by different WOCE participants. The part of S4 completed on this cruise (Figure 1) was a first time occupation. At the western end of the S4 transect, seven of the stations were occupied by the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute ship R.V. Knorr (M. McCartney, pers. comm.) several days prior to occupation by the Aurora Australis. These stations are intended to provide cross-calibrations for the tracer samples and CTD measurements collected by both vessels. An array of four full depth current meter moorings, in the vicinity of the SR3 line at the latitude of the Subantarctic Front, was successfully recovered. The moorings had been deployed in the autumn of 1993 by the Aurora Australis, and at the time of writing, have since been redeployed in the same region by the SCRIPPS ship R.V. Melville as part of a larger mooring array (principal investigators Luther, D., Chave, A., Richman, J., Filloux, J., Rintoul, S. and Church, J.). Additional CTD measurements were made at the four mooring locations. This report describes the collection of oceanographic data from the SR3 and S4 transects, and summaries the chemical analysis and data processing methods employed. Brief comparisons are also made with existing historical data. All information required for use of the data set is presented in tabular and graphical form. 2. CRUISE ITINERARY The cruise commenced with recovery of one of the current meter moorings at ~50o 25'S (Table 4). Increasing winds prevented further recoveries, so it was decided to continue south leaving retrieval of the remaining moorings for the return leg to Hobart. En route to the Australian Antarctic base Casey, a deep water test CTD cast was conducted, and three CTD stations were occupied along the S4 transect. An upward looking sonar mooring (Bush, 1994) (Table 5) was recovered in the vicinity of Casey; an unsuccessful attempt was made to recover an additional upward looking sonar mooring. Following approximately a week of cargo operations at Casey, the S4 transect proper commenced at ~110oE. Due to time constraints, the originally planned station spacing of 30 nautical miles was increased to 45 nautical miles for most of the S4 transect. Included in the section were stations coinciding with the 7 stations occupied by the Knorr (stations 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17 in Table 2 correspond respectively with Knorr stations 85, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91 and 92). Also included were stations coinciding with locations sampled on the meridional sections SR3 and P11 (see Rosenberg et al., 1995a, for description of the P11 transect). Favourable sea ice and weather conditions permitted conclusion of S4 in 560 m of water just off Young Island in the Balleny Island group (Figure 1). On the return west to the start of the SR3 section, a shallow test cast was conducted to test the Niskin bottles for CFC blank levels. The SR3 section commenced with 4 CTD stations at various locations on the shelf in the d'Urville Sea, beginning near Commonwealth Bay. Further north, between 61.3oS and 55.5oS, the station spacing was again increased from 30 to 45 nautical miles, due to further time constraints. Following recovery of the remaining 3 current meter moorings (Table 4) around the Subantarctic Front and additional CTD casts at these sites, the SR3 section was completed. A final CTD cast was conducted to test a suspect instrument before returning to Hobart. 3. CRUISE SUMMARY 3.1 CTD casts and water samples In the course of the cruise, 107 CTD casts were completed along the S4 and SR3 sections (Figure 1) (Table 2), plus additional locations, with most casts reaching to within 15 m of the sea floor (Table 2). Over 2380 Niskin bottle water samples were collected for the measurement of salinity, dissolved oxygen, nutrients (orthophosphate, nitrate plus nitrite, and reactive silicate), chlorofluorocarbons, helium, tritium, dissolved inorganic carbon, alkalinity, carbon isotopes (14C and 13C), dissolved organic carbon, dimethyl sulphide/dimethyl sulphoniopropionate, iodate/iodide, 18O, primary productivity, and biological parameters, using a 24 bottle rosette sampler. Table 3 provides a summary of samples drawn at each station. Principal investigators for the various water sampling programmes are listed in Table 6a. For all stations, the different samples were drawn in a fixed sequence, as discussed in section 4.1.3. The methods for drawing samples are discussed in section 4.1.4. Figure 1: CTD station positions for RSV Aurora Australis cruise AU9404 along WOCE transects S4 and SR3, and current meter mooring locations. Table 2: Summary of station information for RSV Aurora Australis cruise AU9404. The information shown includes time, date, position and ocean depth for the start of the cast, at the bottom of the cast, and or the end of the cast. The maximum pressure reached for each cast, and the altimeter reading at the bottom of each cast (i.e. elevation above the sea bed) are also included. Missing ocean depth values are due to noise from the ship's bow thrusters interfering with the echo sounder. For casts which do not reach to within 100 m of the bed (i.e. the altimeter range), or for which the altimeter was not functioning, there is no altimeter value. For station names, TEST is a test cast. Note that all times are UTC (i.e. GMT). CTD unit (serial no. 1103) was used for stations 1 to 18; CTD unit 5 (serial no. 1193) was used for stations 19 to 106; CTD unit 6 (serial no. 2568) was used for station 107. START depth maxP BOTTOM depth END depth stn no. time date latitude longitude (m) dbar time latitude longitude (m) alt. time latitude longitude (m) -------- -------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- --------------------------------- 1 TEST 0023 20-DEC-94 57:30.52S 127:47.81E 4690 4308 0311 57:32.11S 127:49.47E - - 0355 57:32.32S 127:50.31E 4700 2 S4 1531 21-DEC-94 61:59.51S 120:00.55E 4170 4186 1700 61:59.06S 120:01.68E 4170 - 1837 61:58.78S 120:01.76E 4170 3 S4 2147 21-DEC-94 62:00.30S 119:00.65E 4215 4266 2322 62:00.67S 119:02.14E 4215 - 0115 62:01.00S 119:04.59E 4215 4 S4 0556 22-DEC-94 61:59.97S 118:00.14E 4260 4304 0752 62:00.30S 118:01.60E 4260 - 0949 62:00.81S 118:03.48E 4260 5 S4 1206 2-JAN-95 66:15.84S 110:22.41E 203 182 1215 66:15.79S 110:22.35E - 20.0 1223 66:15.73S 110:22.42E 199 6 S4 1439 2-JAN-95 65:59.05S 109:54.21E 255 192 1516 65:59.26S 109:54.96E 183 9.7 1544 65:59.51S 109:55.07E 158 7 S4 1412 3-JAN-95 65:23.42S 112:33.55E 482 644 1457 65:23.10S 112:33.20E 656 17.4 1548 65:22.73S 112:32.86E 737 8 S4 1750 3-JAN-95 65:18.37S 112:32.75E 1170 1120 1835 65:18.52S 112:32.25E 1157 13.7 1939 65:17.89S 112:32.04E 1164 9 S4 2354 3-JAN-95 64:57.93S 112:10.14E 2310 2284 011 64:57.66S 112:09.60E 2315 13.1 0224 64:57.44S 112:09.31E 2321 10 S4 0416 4-JAN-95 64:44.42S 111:55.21E 2250 2274 0536 64:44.88S 111:55.05E 2300 9.5 0708 64:44.82S 111:54.89E 2300 11 S4 1002 4-JAN-95 64:30.92S 111:24.85E 2900 2866 1127 64:30.87S 111:25.77E 2860 13.5 1303 64:30.63S 111:27.38E 2860 12 S4 1606 4-JAN-95 64:06.06S 112:05.20E 2360 2304 1704 64:06.06S 112:05.92E 2315 11.0 1829 64:06.20S 112:06.66E 2290 13 S4 2057 4-JAN-95 63:41.02S 112:36.06E 3358 3364 2226 63:40.80S 112:36.48E 3360 12.2 0001 63:40.28S 112:35.89E 3365 14 S4 0308 5-JAN-95 63:16.51S 113:12.28E 3590 3596 0441 63:16.50S 113:13.00E - 13.5 0628 63:16.69S 113:13.49E -- 15 S4 1112 5-JAN-95 62:50.95S 113:48.94E 3450 3494 1220 62:50.82S 113:49.10E - - 1348 62:50.58S 113:49.06E -- 16 S4 1713 5-JAN-95 62:25.17S 114:26.07E 4080 4118 1831 62:25.33S 114:25.68E 4086 12.9 2026 62:25.95S 114:25.45E 4080 17 S4 2304 5-JAN-95 62:00.05S 114:59.98E 4250 4286 0033 62:00.03S 115:01.00E 4255 12.6 0214 62:00.09S 115:02.40E 4245 18 S4 0607 6-JAN-95 62:00.17S 116:29.70E 4250 4290 0744 61:59.69S 116:30.46E 4250 14.0 0936 61:59.70S 116:31.81E 4250 19 S4 1730 6-JAN-95 61:59.98S 119:59.82E 4180 4220 1914 62:00.32S 120:01.36E 4175 12.9 2049 62:00.48S 120:02.95E 4182 20 S4 0001 7-JAN-95 62:00.02S 121:24.93E 4153 4174 0139 61:59.80S 121:26.89E 4150 13.2 0331 61:59.70S 121:28.11E 4140 21 S4 0711 7-JAN-95 62:00.01S 122:49.60E 4250 4290 0842 62:00.17S 122:50.44E 4250 5.5 1031 62:00.54S 122:51.60E 4250 22 S4 1356 7-JAN-95 61:59.91S 124:14.98E 4267 4306 1520 62:00.11S 124:15.38E 4265 7.1 1704 62:00.66S 124:15.49E 4265 23 S4 2027 7-JAN-95 61:59.92S 125:39.57E 4338 4378 2211 62:00.22S 125:39.58E 4337 18.1 2349 62:00.34S 125:39.54E 4335 24 S4 0328 8-JAN-95 62:00.04S 127:04.94E 4360 4410 0510 62:00.44S 127:05.46E 4365 17.0 0700 62:01.13S 127:05.55E 4360 25 S4 1033 8-JAN-95 62:00.04S 128:29.96E 4400 4448 1221 62:00.73S 128:31.57E 4400 12.3 1406 62:01.23S 128:32.95E 4400 26 S4 1709 8-JAN-95 61:59.83S 129:54.96E 4490 4540 1903 62:00.25S 129:56.74E 4495 15.6 2041 62:00.70S 129:58.36E 4499 27 S4 0008 9-JAN-95 62:00.07S 131:19.79E 4530 4586 015 62:00.57S 131:20.04E 4540 15.0 0329 62:01.08S 131:20.45E 4540 28 S4 0704 9-JAN-95 62:00.10S 132:44.80E 4460 4514 0858 61:59.92S 132:45.64E 4460 17.6 1054 62:00.09S 132:46.83E 4460 29 S4 1454 9-JAN-95 62:01.23S 134:10.49E 4370 4414 1634 62:01.41S 134:11.11E 4370 12.4 1826 62:01.30S 134:11.22E 4370 30 S4 2205 9-JAN-95 62:00.19S 135:35.04E 4335 4376 2359 62:00.35S 135:35.07E 4330 11.9 0151 61:59.81S 135:35.31E -- 31 S4 0611 10-JAN-95 61:59.99S 137:00.09E 3900 3964 0800 61:59.94S 137:01.31E 3850 13.7 0949 61:59.34S 137:01.14E 3900 32 S4 1311 10-JAN-95 62:10.08S 138:24.63E 3990 4036 1453 62:09.51S 138:27.19E 4020 14.7 1650 62:09.01S 138:29.60E 4031 33 S4 2009 10-JAN-95 62:21.05S 139:51.96E 3950 3994 2155 62:21.54S 139:53.39E 3970 13.2 2343 62:22.09S 139:53.47E 3960 34 S4 0357 11-JAN-95 62:28.75S 141:01.77E 4180 4230 0638 62:28.15S 141:03.29E 4205 13.4 0820 62:27.38S 141:04.32E 4210 35 S4 1130 11-JAN-95 62:35.86S 142:11.92E 4140 4170 1335 62:35.86S 142:12.37E 4140 14.9 1515 62:35.68S 142:12.58E 4140 36 S4 1925 11-JAN-95 62:45.08S 143:36.91E 4110 4154 2118 62:45.83S 143:36.16E 4125 14.5 2300 62:46.56S 143:36.82E 4125 37 S4 0215 12-JAN-95 62:53.96S 145:01.65E 4030 4058 0411 62:54.22S 145:03.26E 4030 13.1 0602 62:54.13S 145:04.60E 4030 38 S4 0910 12-JAN-95 63:03.00S 146:26.98E 3955 3982 104 63:03.12S 146:27.96E 3955 14.6 1238 63:03.43S 146:29.37E 3955 39 S4 1541 12-JAN-95 63:11.17S 147:50.05E 3915 3940 1728 63:10.65S 147:50.90E 3920 16.0 1858 63:10.33S 147:51.15E 3920 40 S4 2227 12-JAN-95 63:18.27S 149:11.87E 3810 3820 0006 63:18.64S 149:12.55E 3780 12.6 0150 63:18.82S 149:12.47E 3800 41 S4 0502 13-JAN-95 63:25.89S 150:38.93E 3765 3780 0634 63:25.89S 150:39.78E 3755 10.1 0805 63:25.59S 150:39.75E 3755 42 S4 1116 13-JAN-95 63:26.03S 152:10.57E 3680 3694 1250 63:25.64S 152:10.83E 3680 16.5 1439 63:25.24S 152:10.98E 3680 43 S4 1749 13-JAN-95 63:26.11S 153:41.67E 3125 3122 1902 63:26.19S 153:41.41E 3110 13.3 2019 63:26.25S 153:40.98E 3115 44 S4 2323 13-JAN-95 63:26.10S 155:10.47E 2960 3108 0052 63:26.10S 155:10.90E 3116 13.6 0212 63:25.77S 155:11.32E 3135 45 S4 0525 14-JAN-95 63:26.01S 156:39.18E 3230 3226 0656 63:25.85S 156:39.08E 3230 17.4 0812 63:25.75S 156:39.11E 3230 46 S4 1147 14-JAN-95 63:26.03S 158:10.12E 2550 2638 1308 63:26.03S 158:09.91E - 19.0 1418 63:25.62S 158:09.43E -- 47 S4 1917 14-JAN-95 63:25.74S 159:26.55E 2710 1020 1956 63:25.64S 159:26.43E 2710 - 2010 63:25.49S 159:26.69E 2700 48 S4 0149 15-JAN-95 64:00.62S 160:10.96E 2880 2844 0302 64:00.89S 160:10.71E 2870 20.7 0418 64:01.29S 160:11.02E 2870 49 S4 0949 15-JAN-95 64:37.34S 160:43.55E 3050 3088 1113 64:37.32S 160:44.28E 3070 14.8 1241 64:36.91S 160:45.12E 3130 50 S4 2005 15-JAN-95 65:17.95S 161:24.01E 3100 3096 2120 65:18.04S 161:23.80E 3100 13.8 2246 65:18.20S 161:23.80E 3100 51 S4 0527 16-JAN-95 65:56.27S 162:03.08E 2970 2964 0648 65:56.02S 162:03.34E 2970 17.1 0803 65:55.52S 162:03.49E 2970 52 S4 1042 16-JAN-95 66:06.84S 162:14.65E 1510 1552 1150 66:06.67S 162:14.18E 1510 14.6 1259 66:06.41S 162:13.83E 1560 53 S4 1443 16-JAN-95 66:09.13S 162:15.49E 567 550 1505 66:09.10S 162:15.34E 568 11.0 1533 66:09.03S 162:15.18E 572 54 TEST 0301 18-JAN-95 64:13.75S 155:19.95E 3210 1038 0345 64:13.93S 155:19.70E 3210 - 0417 64:14.00S 155:19.65E 3210 55 SR3 0525 19-JAN-95 66:35.97S 144:09.76E 850 812 0556 66:36.28S 144:09.63E 850 17.1 0640 66:36.84S 144:09.33E 850 56 SR3 1412 19-JAN-95 66:00.55S 142:39.77E 455 436 1441 66:00.51S 142:39.20E 458 14.1 1505 66:00.64S 142:39.06E 460 57 SR3 1910 19-JAN-95 65:50.53S 141:25.71E 332 308 1920 65:50.58S 141:25.58E 329 14.6 1950 65:50.44S 141:24.97E 335 58 SR3 2312 19-JAN-95 65:34.98S 139:51.24E 595 526 2338 65:35.12S 139:50.37E 528 11.5 0013 65:35.43S 139:49.25E 436 59 SR3 0137 20-JAN-95 65:32.24S 139:51.19E 1300 1242 0234 65:32.49S 139:51.11E 1300 17.4 0337 65:32.58S 139:50.69E 1260 60 SR3 0444 20-JAN-95 65:25.93S 139:50.77E 1875 1988 0550 65:26.26S 139:50.68E 1950 19.2 0654 65:26.48S 139:51.07E -- 61 SR3 0905 20-JAN-95 65:04.98S 139:50.83E 2795 2750 1020 65:04.75S 139:51.64E 2680 17.5 1131 65:04.35S 139:52.41E 2590 62 SR3 1304 20-JAN-95 64:49.03S 139:50.94E 2600 2570 1417 64:49.40S 139:49.38E 2585 12.0 1538 64:50.10S 139:47.95E 2530 63 SR3 1819 20-JAN-95 64:16.92S 139:52.08E 3470 3472 1930 64:17.16S 139:51.31E 3465 11.8 2047 64:17.20S 139:51.36E 3465 64 SR3 2301 20-JAN-95 63:51.92S 139:50.81E 3743 3758 0042 63:51.57S 139:52.15E 3748 13.9 0242 63:51.27S 139:54.55E 3748 65 SR3 0528 21-JAN-95 63:21.19S 139:50.91E 3820 3832 0653 63:21.70S 139:50.47E 3810 13.0 0828 63:22.16S 139:51.22E 3810 66 SR3 1051 21-JAN-95 62:51.09S 139:50.70E 3220 3224 1216 62:50.85S 139:51.08E 3230 17.0 1348 62:50.61S 139:51.54E 3250 67 SR3 1659 21-JAN-95 62:20.78S 139:50.44E 3970 3988 1821 62:20.45S 139:49.66E 3960 15.4 1946 62:20.20S 139:49.60E 3960 68 SR3 2215 21-JAN-95 61:50.98S 139:51.26E 4300 4338 0001 61:51.09S 139:51.16E 4301 15.1 0145 61:51.32S 139:51.11E 4300 69 SR3 0426 22-JAN-95 61:21.06S 139:51.48E 4340 4390 0608 61:21.89S 139:53.30E 4340 14.9 0744 61:22.57S 139:54.52E 4345 70 SR3 1124 22-JAN-95 60:35.99S 139:50.67E 4440 4472 1258 60:36.15S 139:49.93E 4435 14.1 1449 60:35.91S 139:48.93E 4430 71 SR3 1815 22-JAN-95 59:50.90S 139:50.94E 4485 4532 2006 59:50.88S 139:51.78E 4480 11.0 2139 59:51.12S 139:52.93E 4480 72 SR3 0121 23-JAN-95 59:05.96S 139:51.25E 3950 3954 0308 59:05.67S 139:51.61E 3905 12.9 0440 59:05.94S 139:51.86E 3925 73 SR3 0818 23-JAN-95 58:21.11S 139:51.22E 4000 4082 0944 58:21.07S 139:51.71E 4020 12.1 1103 58:20.91S 139:52.44E 4000 74 SR3 1734 23-JAN-95 57:38.75S 139:51.77E 4250 4134 1921 57:38.83S 139:52.72E - 16.4 2055 57:38.99S 139:53.62E -- 75 SR3 0400 24-JAN-95 56:55.80S 139:49.74E 4100 4066 0551 56:56.10S 139:49.69E - - 0726 56:56.07S 139:50.39E -- 76 SR3 1258 24-JAN-95 56:12.73S 140:17.60E 3620 3658 1433 56:12.03S 140:17.54E - 15.1 1609 56:11.60S 140:17.12E -- 77 SR3 1935 24-JAN-95 55:30.06S 140:44.00E 3915 4186 2116 55:30.07S 140:44.29E - 19.9 2243 55:30.03S 140:44.65E -- 78 SR3 0154 25-JAN-95 55:00.82S 141:00.81E 3300 3164 0323 55:00.48S 141:00.91E 3200 16.1 0442 55:00.58S 141:00.81E 3200 79 SR3 0712 25-JAN-95 54:32.38S 141:19.09E 2850 2784 0842 54:31.26S 141:19.08E 2825 17.4 0947 54:30.95S 141:18.25E 2910 80 SR3 1224 25-JAN-95 54:03.87S 141:35.86E 2600 2732 1351 54:03.33S 141:36.00E 2720 17.5 1511 54:02.98S 141:35.93E 2720 81 SR3 1753 25-JAN-95 53:35.18S 141:52.10E 2590 2542 1912 53:34.95S 141:53.05E 2490 15.9 2016 53:35.00S 141:53.20E 2515 82 SR3 2305 25-JAN-95 53:07.90S 142:08.18E 3125 3142 0015 53:07.52S 142:08.51E 3150 16.1 0130 53:07.48S 142:08.64E 3150 83 SR3 0402 26-JAN-95 52:40.06S 142:23.46E 3400 3396 0525 52:40.31S 142:24.37E 3400 10.1 0649 52:40.48S 142:24.41E 3390 84 SR3 0906 26-JAN-95 52:15.97S 142:38.13E 3500 3532 1008 52:15.82S 142:38.72E 3500 13.6 1118 52:16.00S 142:40.31E 3520 85 SR3 1336 26-JAN-95 51:51.13S 142:50.05E 3620 3650 1517 51:51.45S 142:51.75E 3610 14.1 1650 51:51.78S 142:52.86E 3615 86 SR3 0950 27-JAN-95 51:26.06S 143:02.99E 3730 3782 1113 51:25.95S 143:03.69E 3750 13.0 1237 51:26.29S 143:03.88E 3710 87 SR3 1752 27-JAN-95 50:33.31S 142:41.33E 3830 3844 1938 50:33.09S 142:43.09E 380 14.8 2121 50:32.49S 142:44.91E -- 88 SR3 0635 28-JAN-95 51:01.97S 143:13.93E 3800 3892 0814 51:02.60S 143:13.85E - 11.3 0927 51:02.71S 143:13.74E -- 89 SR3 1121 28-JAN-95 50:43.05S 143:24.06E 3650 3726 1250 50:43.21S 143:24.39E 3650 13.2 1424 50:43.53S 143:24.69E 3665 90 SR3 1647 28-JAN-95 50:24.88S 143:32.04E 3588 3604 1822 50:25.23S 143:33.00E 3608 15.5 1938 50:25.72S 143:33.82E -- 91 SR3 2151 28-JAN-95 50:05.08S 143:43.24E 4060 4038 2350 50:04.80S 143:44.91E - 16.7 0114 50:04.65S 143:45.64E -- 92 SR3 0318 29-JAN-95 49:44.03S 143:52.96E 3540 3502 0450 49:43.11S 143:54.13E 3400 19.9 0601 49:42.90S 143:54.66E 3510 93 SR3 1155 29-JAN-95 49:16.03S 144:06.03E 4225 4346 1345 49:15.50S 144:07.83E - 16.5 1532 49:15.26S 144:09.02E -- 94 SR3 1818 29-JAN-95 48:47.02S 144:19.01E 4150 4218 2015 48:46.58S 144:19.20E 4160 15.8 2146 48:46.36S 144:19.40E 4140 95 SR3 0153 30-JAN-95 48:18.66S 144:32.00E 4005 4070 0337 48:18.45S 144:31.86E 4000 4.4 0519 48:18.95S 144:33.03E 4095 96 SR3 0745 30-JAN-95 47:48.04S 144:45.07E 3925 3932 0931 47:47.88S 144:46.14E 3850 9.9 1058 47:47.73S 144:45.82E 3850 97 SR3 1238 30-JAN-95 47:27.94S 144:53.89E 4270 4354 1432 47:27.23S 144:53.70E - 14.6 1616 47:26.69S 144:53.94E -- 98 SR3 1852 30-JAN-95 47:09.06S 145:02.97E 4000 4012 2039 47:09.04S 145:03.06E - 16.4 2210 47:08.97S 145:02.97E -- 99 SR3 0041 31-JAN-95 46:38.89S 145:15.06E 3350 3374 0215 46:38.16S 145:15.37E 3350 14.7 0333 46:37.65S 145:14.88E 3350 100 SR3 0545 31-JAN-95 46:09.92S 145:28.08E 2730 2778 0658 46:09.22S 145:27.90E 2770 17.3 0807 46:08.87S 145:27.54E 2770 101 SR3 1019 31-JAN-95 45:41.77S 145:40.32E 2000 1962 1130 45:41.64S 145:40.36E 1875 19.5 1221 45:41.37S 145:40.21E 1820 102 SR3 1438 31-JAN-95 45:13.01S 145:51.10E 2860 2892 1601 45:13.40S 145:50.37E - 13.8 1715 45:13.78S 145:50.16E 2800 103 SR3 1948 31-JAN-95 44:42.98S 146:03.06E 3200 3220 2119 44:42.58S 146:01.93E 3190 15.1 2233 44:42.36S 146:01.16E 3210 104 SR3 0043 1-FEB-95 44:22.95S 146:10.85E 2345 2344 0157 44:22.98S 146:11.01E 2345 14.1 0301 44:22.98S 146:11.02E 2345 105 SR3 0431 1-FEB-95 44:06.89S 146:12.99E 1000 1012 0522 44:07.16S 146:13.24E 1010 17.2 0556 44:07.50S 146:13.26E 1070 106 SR3 0707 1-FEB-95 44:00.00S 146:19.01E 254 228 0723 43:59.86S 146:18.95E 255 10.1 0749 43:59.79S 146:19.06E 255 107 TEST 1047 1-FEB-95 44:11.83S 146:54.77E 1200 1142 1136 44:11.71S 146:55.01E 1180 60.0 1226 44:12.08S 146:55.15E 1233 Table 3: Summary of samples drawn from Niskin bottles at each station, including salinity (sal), dissolved oxygen (do), nutrients (nut), chlorofluorocarbons (CFC), helium/tritium (He/Tr), dissolved inorganic carbon (dic), alkalinity (alk), carbon isotopes (Ctope), dissolved organic carbon (doc), dimethyl sulphide/dimethyl sulphoniopropionate (dms), iodate/iodide (i), 18O, primary productivity (pp), "Seacat" casts (cat), and the following biological samples: pigments (pig), lugols iodine fixed plankton counts (lug), Coulter counter for particle sizing (cc), bacteria counts (bac), samples to determine presence of viruses inside algae(vir), flow cytometry (fc), video recording (vid), samples for culturing (cul), and transmission electron microscopy (te). Note that 1=samples taken, 0=no samples taken, 2=surface sample only (i.e. from shallowest Niskin bottle); and some biology samples taken from a surface bucket only. Also note that at stations 33, 50, 58, 67, 81 and 94, primary productivity samples were additionally filtered to measure d.o.c. content. ---------------biology------------ stn no. sal do nut CFC He/Tr dic/alk Ctope doc dms i 18O pp cat pig lug cc bac vir fc vid cul te ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 TEST 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 S4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 S4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 4 S4 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 5 S4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 S4 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 7 S4 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 8 S4 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 S4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 S4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 11 S4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 12 S4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 13 S4 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 14 S4 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 S4 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 16 S4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 S4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 18 S4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 19 S4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 S4 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 21 S4 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 S4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 23 S4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 S4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 25 S4 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 26 S4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 27 S4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 S4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 S4 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 S4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 31 S4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 32 S4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 S4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 34 S4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 35 S4 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 36 S4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 37 S4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 38 S4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 39 S4 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 40 S4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 41 S4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 42 S4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 43 S4 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 S4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 45 S4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 46 S4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 47 S4 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 48 S4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 S4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 S4 1 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 51 S4 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 S4 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 53 S4 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 TEST 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 SR3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 56 SR3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 57 SR3 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 58 SR3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 59 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 60 SR3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 61 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 63 SR3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 SR3 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 65 SR3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 66 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 67 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 68 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 69 SR3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 70 SR3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 71 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 72 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 73 SR3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 74 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 75 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 76 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 77 SR3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 78 SR3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 79 SR3 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 80 SR3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 81 SR3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 82 SR3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 83 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 84 SR3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 85 SR3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 86 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 87 SR3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 88 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 89 SR3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 90 SR3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 91 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 92 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 93 SR3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 94 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 96 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 SR3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 98 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 99 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 100 SR3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 SR3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 102 SR3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 103 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 SR3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 105 SR3 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 106 SR3 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 TEST 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Table 4: Current meter moorings recovered along SR3 transect (positions given are at times of deployment). Recovery times are for last mooring component. site recovery bottom current meter nearest CTD name time (UTC) depth(m) latitude longitude depths (m) stn no. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SO2 03:52, 28/01/95 3770 50°33.19'S 142°42.49'E 300 87 SR3 600 1000 2000 3200 SO3 00:42, 27/01/95 3800 51°01.54'S 143°14.35'E 300 88 SR3 600 1000 2000 3200 SO4 05:57, 27/01/95 3580 50°42.73'S 143°24.15'E 300 89 SR3 600 1000 2000 3200 SO5 ~09:30, 15/12/94 3500 50°24.95'S 143°31.97'E 1000 90 SR3 2000 3200 Table 5: Upward looking sonar (ULS) mooring recovered (including current meter [CM]) (positions given are at times of deployment). Recovery time is for last mooring component. site recovery bottom instrument CTD name time (UTC) depth (m) latitude longitude depths (m) stn no. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SOFAR 01:15, 24/12/94 3260 63°17.746'S 107° 49.429'E 150 (ULS) - 200 (CM) SONEAR failed to recover - 3.2 Moorings recovered An array of four current meter moorings was recovered (Table 4) along the SR3 transect line. A single upward looking sonar mooring was recovered near Casey; an unsuccessful attempt was made to locate a second upward looking sonar mooring (Table 5). 3.3 XBT/XCTD deployments A total of 43 XBT and 26 XCTD deployments were made along the SR3 transect. The data were processed further by CSIRO Division of Oceanography (R. Bailey, pers. comm.). Results are not reported here. 3.4 Principal investigators The principal investigators for the CTD and water sample measurements are listed in Table 6a. Cruise participants are listed in Table 6b. Table 6a: Principal investigators (*=cruise participant) for water sampling programmes. measurement name affiliation ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CTD, salinity, O2, nutrients *Steve Rintoul CSIRO chlorofluorocarbons John Bullister NOAA, U.S.A. helium, tritium, 18O Peter Schlosser Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, U.S.A. D.I.C., alkalinity, carbon isotopes *Bronte Tilbrook CSIRO D.O.C. Tom Trull Antarctic CRC D.M.S. Graham Jones James Cook University iodate/iodide Ed Butler CSIRO primary productivity John Parslow CSIRO biological sampling *Simon Wright Antarctic Division Table 6b: Scientific personnel (cruise participants) name measurement affiliation -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ian Knott CTD, electronics Antarctic CRC Simon Marsland CTD Antarctic CRC Phil Morgan CTD CSIRO Steve Rintoul CTD, moorings CSIRO Mark Rosenberg CTD, moorings Antarctic CRC Tim Vizer CTD Antarctic CRC Andrew Woolf CTD Antarctic CRC Steve Bell salinity, oxygen, nutrients Antarctic CRC Ruth Eriksen salinity, oxygen, nutrients Antarctic CRC Adam Leggett oxygen Melbourne University Craig Neill CFC NOAA David Wisegarver CFC NOAA Dee Breger helium, tritium, 18O Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory Brendan Coutts D.I.C.,alkalinity,Cisotopes Antarctic CRC Roger Dargaville D.I.C.,alkalinity,Cisotopes Melbourne University Bronte Tilbrook D.I.C.,alkalinity,Cisotopes CSIRO Susannah Hunter D.O.C. Antarctic CRC Mark Curran D.M.S. James Cook University Megan McDonald D.M.S. James Cook University Anna Brandao iodate/iodide Antarctic CRC Pru Bonham primary productivity CSIRO Fiona Scott biological sampling Antarctic Division Peter Pendoley biological sampling Antarctic Division Simon Wright deputy voyage leader, Antarctic Division biological sampling David James ornithology Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union Tim Reid ornithology Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union Rob Easther voyage leader Antarctic Division Vera Hansper computing Antarctic Division David Little doctor Antarctic Division Tim Osborne computing Antarctic Division Andrew Tabor gear officer, moorings Antarctic Division Mark Underwood electronics Antarctic Division Adam Connolly reporter The Mercury 4 FIELD DATA COLLECTION METHODS 4.1 CTD and hydrology measurements In this section, CTD, hydrology, and ADCP data collection and processing methods are discussed. Preliminary results of the CTD data calibration, along with data quality information, are presented in Section 6. 4.1.1 CTD Instrumentation The CTD instrumentation is described in Rosenberg et al. (1995b). Briefly, General Oceanics Mark IIIC (i.e. WOCE upgraded) CTD units were used. A 24 position rosette package, including a General Oceanics model 1015 pylon, and 10 litre General Oceanics Niskin bottles, was deployed for all casts. Deep sea reversing thermometers (Gohla-Precision) were mounted at rosette positions 2, 12 and 24. A Sea-Tech fluorometer and Li-Cor photosynthetically active radiation sensor were also attached to the package for some casts (Table 22). 4.1.2 C TD instrument and data calibration Complete calibration information for the CTD pressure, platinum temperature and pressure temperature sensors are presented in Appendix 1. Pre cruise pressure and platinum temperature calibrations were available for all three CTD units, performed at the CSIRO Division of Oceanography Calibration Facility, with the exception of CTD unit 6, where manufacturer supplied platinum temperature calibration coefficients were used for the single test cast where this instrument was used. Pre cruise manufacturer supplied calibrations of the pressure temperature sensors were used for the cruise data. Note that readings from this sensor are applied in a correction formula for pressure data. The complete CTD conductivity and dissolved oxygen calibrations, derived respectively from the in situ Niskin bottle salinity and dissolved oxygen samples, are presented in a later section. Manufacturer supplied calibrations were applied to the fluorescence and p.a.r. data (Appendix 1). These calibrations are not expected to be correct - correct scaling of fluorescence and p.a.r. data awaits linkage with primary productivity and Seacat (section 3.2) data. The CTD and hydrology data processing and calibration techniques are described in detail in Appendix 2 of Rosenberg et al. (1995b) (referred to as "CTD methodology" for the remainder of the report). Note however the following updates to the methodology: (i) the 10 seconds of CTD data prior to each bottle firing are averaged to form the CTD upcast for use in calibration (5 seconds was used previously); (ii) the minimum number of data points required in a 2 dbar bin to form an average was set to 6 (i.e. jmin=6; for previous cruises, jmin=10); (iii) in the conductivity calibration for some stations, an additional term was applied to remove the pressure dependent conductivity residual; (iv) CTD raw data obtained from the CTD logging PC's no longer contain end of record characters after every 128 bytes. 4.1.3 CTD and hydrology data collection techniques Data collection techniques are described in Rosenberg et al. (1995b). A fixed sequence was followed for the drawing of water samples on deck, as follows: first sample: CFC D.O.C dissolved oxygen DMS/DMSP helium D.I.C. alkalinity carbon isotopes primary productivity salinity nutrients iodate/iodide 18O tritium last sample: biology (see Table 3 for a summary of which samples were drawn at each station). 4.1.4 Water sampling methods The methods used for drawing the various water samples from the Niskin bottles are described here. Chlorofluorocarbons: 100 ml samples are taken using precision ground glass syringes, following a series of rinses; care is taken to ensure bubble free samples. Dissolved organic carbon: Sample jar volume = 250 ml (jars baked for 12 hours at 550°C) During d.o.c. sampling, polyethylene gloves were worn by the sampler. The gloves were changed every second sample. * rinse spiggot copiously with sample water * rinse sample jar twice * fill jar with ~200 ml and screw cap on tightly After sampling, the jars are stored in the dark in a freezer at -18°C. Dissolved oxygen: sample bottle volume = 150 ml Bottles are washed and left partially filled with fresh water before use. Tight fitting silicon tubing is attached to the Niskin spiggot for sample drawing. Pickling reagent 1 is 3 M MnCl2 (1.0 ml used); reagent 2 is 8 N NaOH/4 M NaI (1.0 ml used); reagent 3 is 10 N H2SO4 (1.0 ml used). * start water flow through tube for several seconds, making sure no bubbles remain in tube * pinch off flow in tube, and insert into bottom of sample bottle * let flow commence slowly into bottle, gradually increasing by releasing tubing, at all times ensuring no bubbles enter the sample and that turbulence is kept to a minimum * fill bottle, overflow by at least one full volume * pinch off tube and slowly remove so that bottle remains full to the brim, then rinse glass stopper * immediately pickle with reagents 1 then 2, inserting reagent dispenser at least 1 cm below water surface * insert glass stopper, ensuring no bubbles are trapped in sample * thoroughly shake sample (at least 30 vigorous inversions) * store samples in the dark until analysis * acidify samples with reagent 3 immediately prior to analysis DMS and DMSP: Sample containers are quickly rinsed, then filled. For shallow samples only, a 750 ml amber glass bottle is used. For full profile sampling, samples for filtering are collected in 250 ml polyethylene screwcap jars; unfiltered samples are collected in 140 ml amber glass bottles. Helium: Plastic tubing is attached to both ends of a 2 foot length of copper tubing, with one of the plastic tubes attached to the Niskin spiggot. The copper tube is self flushed as air bubbles work out of the intake tube; the copper and plastic tube are struck to ensure no bubbles are trapped during filling. The plastic hoses are clamped, and the assembly removed to a hydraulic press where the copper tube is cut and crimped at either end, and in the middle. Dissolved inorganic carbon: sample bottle volume = 250 ml Tight fitting silicon tubing is attached to the Niskin spiggot for sample drawing. Samples are poisoned with 100 _l of a saturated solution of HgCl2. * drain remaining old sample from the bottle * start water flow through tube for several seconds, making sure no bubbles remain in tube * insert tube into bottom of inverted sample bottle, allowing water to flush bottle for several seconds * pinch off flow in tube, and invert sample bottle to upright position, keeping tube in bottom of bottle * let flow commence slowly into bottle, gradually increasing, at all times ensuring no bubbles enter the sample * fill bottle, overflow by one full volume, and rinse cap * shake a small amount of water from top, so that water level is between threads and bottle shoulder * insert tip of poison dispenser just into sample, and poison * screw on cap, and invert bottle several times to allow poison to disperse through sample Alkalinity: These are sampled and poisoned in the same fashion as dissolved inorganic carbon, except that 500 ml bottles are used. Carbon Isotopes: These are sampled and poisoned in the same fashion as dissolved inorganic carbon, except that 500 ml glass stoppered vacuum flasks are used, and vacuum grease is placed around the stopper before inserting. Primary productivity: Sampled from casts taken during daylight hours; samples were drawn for analysis of primary productivity and suspended particle size (taken from the shallowest four Niskin bottles). At most primary productivity sites, a Seabird "Seacat" CTD was deployed to obtain vertical profiles of photosynthetically active radiation (p.a.r.) and fluorescence from the top part of the water column. For primary productivity samples, 500 ml blacked out plastic jars are quickly rinsed then gently filled with ~400 ml of water through a length of tubing attached to the Niskin spiggot. Samples for particle size analysis are collected in 250 ml plastic bottles (with a single quick rinse prior to filling). Salinity: sample bottle volume = 300 ml * drain remaining old sample from the bottle (bottles are always stored * approximately 1/3 full with water between stations) * rinse bottle and cap 3 times with 100 ml of sample (shaking thoroughly each time); on each rinse, contents of sample bottle are poured over the Niskin bottle spiggot * fill bottle with sample, to bottle shoulder, and screw cap on firmly At all filling stages, care is taken not to let the Niskin bottle spiggot touch the sample bottle. Nutrients: sample tube volume = 12 ml Two nutrient sample tubes are filled simultaneously at each Niskin bottle. * rinse tubes and caps 3 times * fill tubes * shake out water from tubes so that water level is at or below marking * line 2 cm below top of tubes (10 ml mark), and screw on caps firmly After sampling, one set of tubes are refrigerated for analysis within 12 hours; the duplicate set of tubes are placed in a freezer until required. Iodate: same as for nutrients Iodide: same as for nutrients, except 100 ml plastic bottle used. 18O: Sample bottle volume = 20 ml Sample bottles given 3 quick rinses, then filled. Tritium: 1 litre argon-filled bottles are filled to the top, minus headspace. Biological sampling: Several different analyses were performed on the biological water samples, as listed in Table 3. Biological samples were usually drawn from the shallowest four or five Niskin bottles, with additional samples collected from a surface bucket. 4.1.5 Hydrology analytical methods The analytical techniques and data processing routines employed in the Hydrographic Laboratory onboard the ship are discussed in Appendix 3 of Rosenberg et al. (1995b). Note the following changes to the methodology: (i) 150 ml sample bottles were used (300 ml bottles had been used previously), and 1.0 ml of reagents 1, 2 and 3 were used (2.0 ml used previously); the corresponding calculation value for the total amount of oxygen added with the reagents = 0.017 ml (0.034 ml previously); (ii) exact oxygen sample bottle volumes were individually measured, and applied for each individual bottle in the calculation of dissolved oxygen concentration. 4.2 Underway measurements Throughout the cruise, the ship's data logging system continuously recorded bottom depth, ship's position and motion, surface water properties and meteorological information. All measurements were quality controlled during the cruise, to remove bad data (Ryan, 1995). After quality controlling of the automatically logged GPS data set, gaps (due to missing data and data flagged as bad) are automatically filled by dead-reckoned positions (using the ship's speed and heading). Positions used for CTD stations are derived from this final GPS data set. Bottom depth is measured by a Simrad EA200 12 kHz echo sounder. A sound speed of 1498 ms-1 is used for all depth calculations, and the ship's draught of 7.3 m has been accounted for in final depth values (i.e. depths are values from the surface). Seawater is pumped on board via an inlet at 7 m below the surface. A portion of this water is diverted to the thermosalinograph (Aplied Microsystems Ltd, model STD-12), and to the fluorometer (Turner Design, peak sensitivity for chlorophyll-a). Sea surface temperatures are measured by a sensor next to the seawater inlet at 7 m depth. The underway measurements for the cruise are contained in column formatted ascii files. The two file types are as follows (see Appendix 4 in Rosenberg et al., 1995b, for a complete description): (i) 10 second digitised underway measurement data, including time, latitude, longitude, depth and sea surface temperature; (ii) 15 minute averaged data, including time, latitude and longitude, air pressure, wind speed and direction, air temperature, humidity, quantum radiation, ship speed and heading, roll and pitch, sea surface salinity and temperature, average fluorescence, and seawater flow. 4.3 ADCP A vessel mounted acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) was installed in the hull during dry-docking of the ship in mid 1994. The unit is a high power 150 kHz narrow band ADCP produced by RD Instruments. The four transducer heads are mounted in a concave Janus configuration, with the beams 30 degrees off vertical, and with the transducers aligned at 45o to fore and aft. The transducers are mounted in a seachest ~7 m below the water surface, behind a 81 mm thick low density polyethylene window, with the window flush to the ship's hull. The inside of the seachest is lined with acoustic tiles (polyurethane with barytes and air microsphere fillers), and filled with hypersaline water. ADCP data were logged on a Sparc 5 Sun workstation. Logging parameters are listed in Table 7. An array of sounders is mounted on the ship for use in hydroacoustic biology surveys (T. Pauly, pers. comm.). When these sounders are in operation, firing of the ADCP is synchronised with the sounder trigger pulses, to avoid interference between the two systems. When this synchronisation is active, the ADCP ping rate is lowered by ~35%. When the ADCP system bottom tracking is active, the ping rate is decreased by ~50 %. Gyrocompass heading data were logged on the Sun through a synchro to digital converter, at a one second sampling frequency. GPS data collected by a Lowrance receiver were also logged by the Sun; the Lowrance unit received GPS positions every 2 seconds, and GPS velocities every 2 seconds, with positions and velocities received on alternate seconds. ADCP data processing is discussed in more detail in Dunn (a and b, unpublished reports). Table 7: ADCP logging parameters. ping parameters bottom track ping parameters ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- no. of bins: 50 no. of bins: 128 bin length: 8 m bin length: 4 m pulse length: 8 m pulse length: 32 m delay: 4 m ping interval: minimum ping interval: same as profiling pings reference layer averageing: bins 3 to 6 (13/12/94-13/01/95 i.e. files 1-86) bins 3 to 10 (13/01/95-21/01/95 i.e. files 87-107) bins 3 to 13 (21/01/95-01/02/95 i.e. files 108-136) ensemble averageing duration: 3 min. 5 MAJOR PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED 5.1 Logistics The only significant logistic problem was shortage of time, due in part to delayed cargo operations at Casey. For part of the transects, as mentioned above, station spacing was increased to 45 nautical miles, to ensure completion of the oceanographic work in the available time. 5.2 CTD sensors Various problems occurred with the CTD sensors over the course of the cruise. For CTD 1103 (used for the first 18 stations), the conductivity output became increasingly noisy after station 10, resulting in random salinity noise with an amplitude up to ~0.01 psu. The CTD was finally changed to CTD 1193 following station 18. After the cruise, the noise problem in CTD 1103 was traced to loosely mounted cards inside the housing. Conductivity noise was minimal for CTD 1193, however the conductivity cell response showed a strong pressure dependence. In addition, the same conductivity cell displayed significant hysteresis between the down and upcasts. These problems are discussed in more detail in section 6. Following station 56, the conductivity cell on CTD 1193 was changed for a spare. The spare cell functioned well, except for a transient error when first entering the water - the cell appeared to need soaking near the surface for up to 2 minutes, before a stable conductivity reading was reached. Prior to station 95, moisture was discovered entering the CTD 1193 housing, causing corrosion of the fast temperature sensor connector. The fault was traced to pits in the o-ring seats of the metal mounting plate on which the conductivity and fast temperature sensors are mounted. As a temporary fix, the connectors were sprayed with a water displacing agent, and the space behind the sensors in the housing was filled with grease. No leakage occurred for the remaining stations, however one or more of these substances caused slight contamination of the conductivity cell, resulting in a small amount of signal noise over the next few stations. For both CTD 1103 and 1193, the oxygen sensor oil reservoir housing could not be screwed tightly onto the mounting connector threads. As a result, any impact, such as caused by the instrument breaking through the water surface on deployment, caused the housing to move sufficiently for the silicon oil to drain past the o-ring, and resulting in loss of data (see section 6). This occurred several times early in the cruise. Following station 28, 2 adjacent o-rings (instead of the usual 1) were installed in the oxygen oil reservoir housing, solving the oil drainage problem. Following station 76, a crack was discovered in the housing window for the photosynthetically active radiation sensor. The sensor was not used for the remainder of the cruise. The altimeter did not function for the first 4 stations, thus these CTD casts were only taken to within ~100 to 200 m of the bottom. Following station 4, the problem was traced to a burnt out chip in CTD 1103. The altimeter performed well for the remainder of the cruise, allowing close CTD approaches to the bottom (Table 2). 5.3 Other equipment The first few days of bathymetry data were lost due to problems with the 12 kHz echo sounder transducer. Good bathymetry data was obtained starting from 19/12/94 UTC. Routing of the aft CTD winch wire resulted in serious kinking of the wire on several occasions - the wire required retermination each time. Following station 33, operations were changed to the forward CTD winch wire, and no more serious problems occurred for the remainder of the cruise. One of the upward looking sonar moorings (Table 5) could not be located with the acoustic release surface transducer. No attempt was made to send the release command, owing to the significant sea ice coverage. At the time of writing, further recovery attempts indicated the mooring was no longer present at the deployment site. 6 RESULTS This section details information relevant to the creation and the quality of the final CTD and hydrology data set. For actual use of the data, the following is important: CTD data - Tables 14 and 15, and section 6.1.2; hydrology data - Tables 18 and 19. Historical data comparisons are made in section 7. Data file formats are described in Appendix 4 of Rosenberg et al. (1995b). 6.1 CTD measurements 6.1.1 Creation of CTD 2 dbar-averaged and upcast burst data Conductivity Four different conductivity cells were used during the cruise, as follows: conductivity cell 1, stations 1-18 (using CTD 1103); conductivity cell 2, stations 19-56 (using CTD 1193); conductivity cell 3, stations 57-106 (using CTD 1193); conductivity cell 4, station 107 (using CTD 2568). With the exception of cell 4, all the conductivity cells displayed large transient errors when entering the water. In addition, cell 3 displayed significant hysteresis between downcast and upcast conductivity data. As result, for stations 1 to 106, upcast CTD data was used for all the 2dbar averaged pressure, temperature and conductivity data. Note that station 107 data were not used. The response of conductivity cells 1 and 2 showed a pressure dependence, much stronger in the case of cell 2. For both these cells (i.e. stations 1 to 56), the pressure dependent conductivity residual was removed by the following steps: (a) CTD conductivity was initially calibrated to derive conductivity residuals (cbtl - ccal), where cbtl and ccal are as defined in the CTD methodology, noting that ccal is the conductivity value after the initial calibration only i.e. prior to any pressure dependent correction. (b) Next, for each station grouping (Table 11), a linear pressure dependent fit was found for the conductivity residuals i.e. for station grouping i, fit parameters alpha (Table 11) and beta were found from (c(sub btl) - c(sub cal)n = alpha*p(sub n) + beta (eqn 1) (look under pdf file for precise formula format) where the residuals (c(sub btl) - c(sub cal)*n and corresponding pressures p(sub n) (i.e. pressures where Niskin bottles fired) are all the values accepted for conductivity calibration in the station grouping. (c) Lastly, the conductivity calibration was repeated, this time fitting (c(sub ctd) + alpha*p) to the bottle values c(sub btl) in order to remove the linear pressure dependence for each station grouping i (for uncalibrated conductivity c(sub ctd) as defined in the CTD methodology; and note that the offsets beta were not applied). Dissolved oxygen For stations 19 to 106, downcast oxygen temperature and oxygen current data were merged with the upcast pressure, temperature and conductivity data (upcast dissolved oxygen data is in general not reliable). With this data set, calibration of the dissolved oxygen data then followed the usual methodology. No CTD oxygen data was obtained for stations 1 to 18, due to a hardware fault in CTD 1103. A small additional error in CTD dissolved oxygen data is expected to occur from the merging of downcast oxygen data with upcast pressure, temperature and conductivity data - where horizontal gradients occur, there will be some mismatch of downcast and upcast data as the ship drifts during a CTD cast. At most, this error is not expected to exceed ~3%. Summary stations 1-18: all CTD data from upcast; weak pressure dependent conductivity residual removed; no CTD dissolved oxygen data; stations 19-56: CTD data from upcast, except for dissolved oxygen data (downcast); strong pressure dependent conductivity residual removed. stations 57-106: CTD data from upcast, except for dissolved oxygen data (downcast). Further information relevant to the creation of the calibrated CTD data is tabulated, as follows: * Surface pressure offsets calculated for each station are listed in Table 10. * Missing 2 dbar data averages are listed in the files avmiss.out and avoxmiss.out (the latter for CTD dissolved oxygen). * CTD conductivity calibration coefficients, including the station groupings used for the conductivity calibration, are listed in Tables 11 and 12. * CTD raw data scans flagged for special treatment are listed in Table 13. * Suspect 2 dbar averages are listed in Tables 14 and 15. The file avinterp.out lists 2 dbar averages which are linear interpolations of the surrounding 2 dbar averages. * CTD dissolved oxygen calibration coefficients are listed in Table 16. The starting values used for the coefficients prior to iteration, and the coefficients varied during the iteration, are listed in Table 17. * Stations containing fluorescence and photosynthetically active radiation data are listed in Table 22. * The different protected and unprotected thermometers used for the stations are listed in Table 23. 6.1.2 CTD data quality The final calibration results for conductivity/salinity and dissolved oxygen, along with the performance check for temperature, are plotted in Figures 2 to 5. For temperature, salinity and dissolved oxygen, the respective residuals (Ttherm - Tcal), (sbtl - scal) and (obtl - ocal) are plotted. For conductivity, the ratio cbtl/ccal is plotted. Note that for stations where a correction was made for the pressure dependent conductivity error, ccal here refers to the final calibrated value after the correction. Ttherm and Tcal are respectively the protected thermometer and calibrated upcast CTD burst temperature values; sbtl, scal, obtl, ocal, cbtl and ccal , and the mean and standard deviation values in Figures 2 to 5, are as defined in the CTD methodology. CTD data quality cautions for the various parameters are discussed below. Table 8 contains a summary of these cautions. Pressure The titanium strain gauge pressure sensors used in the Mark IIIC CTD's display a higher noise level than the older stainless steel strain gauge models, with a typical rms of ~(0.2 dbar (Millard et al., 1993). Noise in the pressure signal for CTD 1193 (used for stations 19 to 106) was found to be higher than this, with spikes of up to 1 dbar amplitude occurring. In the creation of CTD raw data files monotonically increasing with pressure (see CTD methodology), pressure spikes with a width exceeding 3 data points are retained as real values. Thus as a result of the high noise levels for CTD 1193, a large number of 2 dbar bins were missing, as not enough data points were present in these bins to form a bin average. The number of missing bins was reduced by setting to 6 the minimum number of data points required in a 2 dbar bin to form an average (i.e. jmin=6; for previous cruises, jmin=10). Note that jmin=6 was used for the entire cruise. For remaining missing bins, values were linearly interpolated between surrounding bins, except where the local temperature gradient exceeded 0.005oC between the surrounding bins i.e. temperature gradient > 0.00125 degrees/dbar. For stations 48, 54 and 72, surface pressure offset values fell on small pressure spikes, thus the final surface pressure offsets were estimated from a manual inspection of the pressure data. A manual estimate was also required for station 55. The surface pressure offset values for stations 66 and 76 were estimated from the surrounding stations (Table 10). Any resulting additional error in the CTD pressure data is judged to be small (no more than 0.2 dbar). For stations 7, 11, 16, 28, 65 and 66, flooding of the dissolved oxygen sensor with seawater resulted in bad pressure temperature data (as discussed in Rosenberg et al., 1995b). To allow accurate calculation of pressure in dbar, the following pressure temperature data were used in pressure calculations for these stations: station with bad used pressure temperature pressure temperature data from this station for upcast ------------------------------------------------------- 7 8 11 10 16 17 28 27 65 64 66 67 for p>=2000 dbar 66 66 for p<2000 dbar Note that the pressure temperature profiles chosen above provide the closest match to the assumed pressure temperature profiles for stations 7, 11, 16, 28, 65 and 66, and any errors are judged to be small (<0.3 dbar). Salinity The conductivity ratios for all bottle samples are plotted in Figure 3, while the salinity residuals are plotted in Figure 4. The final standard deviation values for the salinity residuals (Figure 4) indicate the CTD salinity data over the whole cruise is accurate to within µ 0.002 psu. No conductivity residual correction was made for stations 1 and 54: all bottles were fired at the same depth for these stations (test casts), so that any pressure dependent conductivity residual (section 6.1.1) could not be quantified. Note that as a result, the salinities for these stations can only be considered as accurate to ~0.01 psu. Bottle salinity data was lost for station 24, due to malfunction of the salinometer. The station was grouped with surrounding stations for conductivity calibration (Table 11). No conductivity residual correction (section 6.1.1) was made for stations 3 to 10 and 52 to 53, as no pressure dependent conductivity residual was found for these stations. Temperature The temperature residuals are shown in Figure 2, along with the mean offset and standard deviation of the residuals. The thermometer value used in each case is the mean of the two protected thermometer readings (protected thermometers used are listed in Table 23). Note that in the figures, the "dubious" and "rejected" categories refer to corresponding bottle samples and upcast CTD bursts in the conductivity calibration, rather than to CTD/thermometer temperature values. For CTD 1193 (stations 19 to 106), there was a problem with the laboratory calibration of the platinum temperature sensor. With the original pre-cruise calibration coefficients, an offset of 0.007°C was found between CTD and reversing thermometer temperature values. As a consequence, an additional offset value of -0.007°C (Appendix 1) was applied to all CTD temperature values for stations 19 to 106. Table 8: Summary of cautions to CTD data quality. stn # CTD parameter caution ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 salinity test cast - all bottles fired at same depth; salinity accuracy reduced 5 all parameters data for this station bad, due to CTD power supply problem 7 pressure station 8 pressure temperature profile used for pressure calculation 11 pressure station 10 pressure temperature profile used for pressure calculation 16 pressure station 17 pressure temperature profile used for pressure calculation 24 salinity CTD conductivity calibrated with bottles from surrounding stations 28 pressure station 27 pressure temperature profile used for pressure calculation 47 salinity, oxygen most bottles tripped on the fly - may introduce small inaccuracy into the conductivity and dissolved oxygen calibrations 54 salinity test cast - all bottles fired at same depth; salinity accuracy reduced 65 pressure station 64 pressure temperature profile used for pressure calculation 66 pressure surface pressure offset estimated from surrounding stations 66 pressure station 67 pressure temperature profile used for pressure calculation for pľ2000 dbar 76 pressure surface pressure offset estimated from surrounding stations 107 all parameters data not used for this station (test cast only) 2-4, salinity additional correction applied for pressure dependent conductivity residual 11-51, 55-56 19 to 106 temperature additional calibration offset value based on comparison with reversing thermometer data 1 to 107 fluorescence/p.a.r. fluorescence and p.a.r. sensors (where active) are uncalibrated 1 to 18 oxygen no CTD dissolved oxygen data due to faulty hardware 28,65,66 oxygen no CTD dissolved oxygen data due to oil drainage from sensor housing Dissolved Oxygen After the cruise, the CTD dissolved oxygen data for CTD 1103 (stations 1 to 18) was found to be unusable. The fault was traced to incorrect wiring in the factory-provided oxygen sensor mounting.The dissolved oxygen residuals are plotted in Figure 5. The final standard deviation values are within 1% of full scale values (where full scale is approximately equal to 250 µmol/l for pressure > 750 dbar, and 350 µmol/l for pressure < 750 dbar). In general, good calibrations of the CTD dissolved oxygen data were obtained using the in situ bottle data, however some atypical values were found for the calibration coefficients (Tables 16 and 17) (see the CTD methodology for full details of calibration formulae). For most stations, the best calibration was achieved using large values of the order 10.0 for the coefficient K(sub 1) (i.e. oxygen current slope), and large negative values of the order -1.5 for the coefficient K(sub 3) (i.e. oxygen current bias). This, however, is not considered relevant to actual data quality. In addition, the following unusual coefficient values were found (for typical values, see Millard and Yang, 1993, and Millard, 1991): stations 56 and 58: K(sub 5) > 1 (usually expect 0 750 dbar. In general, no organised sample replication was carried out, thus the replicate data set discussed here is small. Most replicate data were obtained opportunistically, from multiple fired Niskin bottles taken during bottle test casts, or from depths sampled in both casts of shallow/deep cast pairs. Two types of replicate data were obtained from the hydrology data set, as follows. Replicate samples drawn from the same Niskin bottle A series of repeat nutrient samples were drawn from 2 different Niskin bottles at station 32. At each of the Niskins, the absolute value of the differences about the mean value were formed (Figure 6a). Precision values for phosphate, nitrate+nitrite and silicate are respectively 0.16%, 0.22% and 0.35% of the full scale deflection (Table 9a). Table 9a: Precision data for replicates drawn from same Niskin bottle. standard deviation % of full scale number of number parameter of differences deflection samples sample groups ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ phosphate 0.0047 µmol/l 0.16 22 2 nitrate+nitrite 0.0765 µmol/l 0.22 24 2 silicate 0.4906 µmol/l 0.35 24 2 Replicate samples drawn from different Niskin bottles tripped at same depth At several stations, multiple Niskin bottles were fired at a single depth. For each set of Niskin bottles tripped at a single depth, a mean value mx was calculated for the sample set and the differences x-mx formed, where x is the phosphate, nitrate+nitrite, silicate, salinity or dissolved oxygen bottle value; the standard deviation of all x-mx values for the replicate data was calculated. Absolute values of the differences x-mx are shown in Figure 6b, and the results are summarised in Table 9b. It is assumed that these precision values would be further reduced if sample groups were drawn from the same Niskin bottle. Table 9b: Precision data for replicates drawn from Niskin bottles tripped at the same depth. standard deviation % of full scale number of number parameter of x-mx or max. value samples sample groups ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- phosphate 0.0061 µmol/l 0.20 59 24 nitrate+nitrite 0.1473 µmol/l 0.42 66 27 silicate 0.6266 µmol/l 0.45 67 27 salinity 0.0007 psu -- 67 27 dissolved oxygen 0.1446 µmol/l 0.06 66 27 7 HISTORICAL DATA COMPARISONS In this section, a brief comparison is made between the au9404 cruise data, and data from the previous cruise au9407 (Rosenberg et al., 1995b). 7.1 Dissolved oxygen Vertical profiles of CTD dissolved oxygen concentrations for cruises au9404 and au9407 are compared in Figure 7. Note that dissolved oxygen concentrations of bottle samples for both cruises were measured using the WHOI automated method (see Appendix 3, Rosenberg et al., 1995b). Concentration values for the two cruises are in general consistent. 7.2 Salinity The meridional variation of the salinity maximum for the two cruises i.e. for Lower Circumpolar Deep Water (as defined by Gordon, 1967) is compared in Figure 8. For the comparison, CTD 2 dbar data were used i.e. CTD salinity, temperature and pressure values at the nearest 2 dbar bin to the salinity maximum for each station. Note that in the figure, property differences are only formed between station pairs (i.e. corresponding au9404 and au9407 stations) which are separated by less than 1.5 nautical miles of latitude. There appears to be a mean offset of ~0.003 psu between the two cruises (Figure 8), smaller than the large salinity offset of ~0.007 psu found between cruises au9309 and au9407 (Appendix 6 in Rosenberg et al., 1995b). Note that there is no consistent biasing of the temperature or pressure data (Figure 8), suggesting that the difference is due to salinity alone, the same result as found for the comparison between earlier cruises. In summary, the following approximate mean salinity differences are evident for the successive occupations of the SR3 transect: cruise comparison mean salinity difference ------------------------------------------- au9309-au9101 < 0.002 psu au9309-au9407 0.007 psu au9404-au9407 0.003 psu As discussed in Rosenberg et al. 1995b, the most likely source of any systematic salinity error is the salinometers (YeoKal Mk IV) used for the analysis of salinity samples from the Niskin bottles. However, the exact cause of the error remains inconclusive. At the time of writing, two more recent occupations of SR3 stations await processing, while a further transect of SR3 is planned using more accurate salinometers (Guildline Autosals). These later data sets may clarify any instrument errors. 7.3 Nutrients Phosphate and nitrate+nitrite concentrations are in general consistent for the au9404 and au9407 data, revealed by comparison of the nitrate+nitrite to phosphate ratio (Figure 9). Note that for au9404, the depressed phosphate values at the approximate nitrate+nitrite level of 25 (mol/l are all near surface values, and are to be regarded as questionable data (see section 6.2.1 for more details). There is a small non-linearity in the nitrate+nitrite to phosphate ratio for both cruises, with low nutrient values lying below the best fit linear relationship (Figure 9). A similar trend is evident in data from cruise au9309 (Figure A6.4 in Rosenberg et al., 1995b), and data along the P11 transect from cruise au9391 (Figure A6.10 in Rosenberg et al., 1995a) (although there is more scatter in the au9391 data). For cruise au9404, these low values correspond with near surface samples north of the Subantarctic Front (Figure 10) i.e. north of ~50°S. Note that at both the Subantarctic and Subtropical Fronts (at ~50°S and ~45.5°S respectively from inspection of surface temperatures in Figure 10), there is a sharp horizontal gradient in surface nutrient values, with concentrations decreasing to the north across the fronts. A corresponding northward decrease in the nitrate+nitrite to phosphate ratio is also evident (Figure 10), accounting for the non-linearity in the ratio at low nutrient concentrations (Figure 9). This effect, also observed in the earlier cruises, appears to be a real feature. Figure 2: Temperature residual (T(sub therm)) - (T(sub cal)) versus station number for cruise au9404. The solid line is the mean of all the residuals; the broken lines are (the standard deviation of all the residuals (as defined in the CTD methodology). Note that the "dubious" and "rejected" categories refer to the conductivity calibration. Figure 3: Conductivity ratio cbtl/ccal versus station number for cruise au9404. The solid line follows the mean of the residuals for each station; the broken lines are ( the standard deviation of the residuals for each station (as defined in the CTD methodology). Figure 4: Salinity residual (sbtl - scal) versus station number for cruise au9404. The solid line is the mean of all the residuals; the broken lines are (the standard deviation of all the residuals (as defined in the CTD methodology). Figure 5: Dissolved oxygen residual (°(sub btl)) - (°(sub cal)) versus station number for cruise au9404. The solid line follows the mean residual for each station; the broken lines are ( the standard deviation of the residuals for each station (as defined in the CTD methodology). Figure 6: Absolute value of parameter differences for replicate samples, for replicates drawn from (a) the same Niskin bottle, and (b) different Niskins tripped at the same depth. Note that differences are between parameter values and depth mean. Figure 7: CTD dissolved oxygen vertical profile data for comparison of au9404 and au9407 data. Figure 8: Variation with latitude south along the SR3 transect of properties at the deep salinity maximum (marking the Lower Circumpolar Deep Water): property differences are between cruise au9404 and cruise au9407 i.e. au9404 value minus au9407 value. Note that differences are formed only between stations from the two cruises which are separated by no more than 1.5 nautical miles of latitude. Figure 9: Bulk plot of nitrate+nitrite versus phosphate for all au9404 and au9407 data along the SR3 transect, together with linear best fit lines. Figure 10: Meridional variation along the SR3 transect of CTD temperature, phosphate concentration, and nitrate+nitrite to phosphate ratio, all at the near surface Niskin bottle. Table 10: Surface pressure offsets (as defined in the CTD methodology). ** indicates that value is estimated from surrounding stations, or else determined from manual inspection of pressure data. surface | surface | surface | surface p offset | p offset | p offset | p offset stn # (dbar) | stn # (dbar) | stn # (dbar) | stn # (dbar) ---------------- | ---------------- | ----------------- | ---------------- 1 TEST -1.15 | 28 S4 -1.19 | 55 SR3 -1.40** | 82 SR3 -1.86 2 S4 -2.87 | 29 S4 -1.04 | 56 SR3 -1.25 | 83 SR3 -1.57 3 S4 -2.42 | 30 S4 -0.71 | 57 SR3 -1.51 | 84 SR3 -1.47 4 S4 -3.36 | 31 S4 -1.47 | 58 SR3 -1.57 | 85 SR3 -1.84 5 S4 -3.17 | 32 S4 -1.40 | 59 SR3 -1.49 | 86 SR3 -1.47 6 S4 -3.63 | 33 S4 -0.93 | 60 SR3 -1.41 | 87 SR3 -1.25 7 S4 -2.16 | 34 S4 -0.84 | 61 SR3 -0.87 | 88 SR3 -1.42 8 S4 -3.46 | 35 S4 -0.87 | 62 SR3 -1.50 | 89 SR3 -1.47 9 S4 -2.24 | 36 S4 -0.57 | 63 SR3 -1.48 | 90 SR3 -1.59 10 S4 -3.31 | 37 S4 -1.98 | 64 SR3 -1.28 | 91 SR3 -1.77 11 S4 -3.45 | 38 S4 -1.54 | 65 SR3 -1.83 | 92 SR3 -2.02 12 S4 -3.24 | 39 S4 -1.14 | 66 SR3 -1.32** | 93 SR3 -1.77 13 S4 -3.55 | 40 S4 -0.94 | 67 SR3 -1.32 | 94 SR3 -1.29 14 S4 -3.75 | 41 S4 -1.06 | 68 SR3 -1.17 | 95 SR3 -1.28 15 S4 -3.24 | 42 S4 -0.84 | 69 SR3 -1.28 | 96 SR3 -1.74 16 S4 -3.86 | 43 S4 -1.13 | 70 SR3 -1.36 | 97 SR3 -1.86 17 S4 -3.73 | 44 S4 -1.03 | 71 SR3 -1.04 | 98 SR3 -1.94 18 S4 -2.96 | 45 S4 -1.61 | 72 SR3 -0.90** | 99 SR3 -1.46 19 S4 -0.40 | 46 S4 -0.60 | 73 SR3 -0.87 | 100 SR3 -2.24 20 S4 -0.29 | 47 S4 -0.59 | 74 SR3 -1.07 | 101 SR3 -1.49 21 S4 -1.08 | 48 S4 -1.00** | 75 SR3 -1.09 | 102 SR3 -1.77 22 S4 -0.63 | 49 S4 -1.08 | 76 SR3 -1.66** | 103 SR3 -1.55 23 S4 -0.82 | 50 S4 -0.92 | 77 SR3 -1.66 | 104 SR3 -1.34 24 S4 -0.32 | 51 S4 -0.66 | 78 SR3 -1.32 | 105 SR3 -1.52 25 S4 -0.42 | 52 S4 -1.22 | 79 SR3 -1.67 | 106 SR3 -1.73 26 S4 -0.72 | 53 S4 -1.58 | 80 SR3 -2.37 | 27 S4 -0.93 | 54 TEST -1.10** | 81 SR3 -1.94 | Table 11: CTD conductivity calibration coefficients. F1 , F2 and F3 are respectively conductivity bias, slope and station-dependent correction calibration terms. n is the number of samples retained for calibration in each station grouping; _ is the standard deviation of the conductivity residual for the n samples in the station grouping (eqn A2.19 in the CTD methodology); _ is the correction applied to CTD conductivities due to pressure dependence of the conductivity residuals (eqn 1). station grouping F1 F2 F3 n sigma alpha ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 001 to 002 S4 -0.55151931E-01 0.98768159E-03 -0.25816422E-06 43 0.001388 0 (stn 1) 0.7039725E-06 (stn 2) 003 to 004 S4 -0.55896676E-01 0.98729002E-03 -0.10392899E-07 35 0.001552 0.7039725E-06 005 to 006 S4 -1.3093410 0.10322266E-02 0 9 0.001772 0 007 to 008 S4 -0.54926719E-01 0.98668229E-03 0.31628388E-07 33 0.001976 0 009 to 010 S4 -0.84408096E-01 0.98892340E-03 -0.11378698E-06 43 0.001072 0 011 to 012 S4 -0.79525457E-01 0.98788105E-03 -0.17868175E-07 45 0.000863 1.4608959E-06 013 to 014 S4 -0.47581367E-01 0.98643852E-03 0.20690218E-07 43 0.001268 0.8503317E-06 015 to 018 S4 -0.90261955E-01 0.98726571E-03 0.52286883E-07 87 0.001082 1.1245280E-06 019 to 020 S4 0.35624898E-01 0.95488768E-03 0.12901507E-06 44 0.001376 -3.9074269E-06 021 to 022 S4 0.35077650E-01 0.95983939E-03 -0.11562160E-06 46 0.001699 -3.1360125E-06 023 to 027 S4 0.21164570E-02 0.95849180E-03 -0.70763325E-08 85 0.001277 -3.8628606E-06 028 to 029 S4 0.10941363E-01 0.95544232E-03 0.89732482E-07 46 0.001467 -4.1948918E-06 030 to 031 S4 0.88594631E-02 0.95649136E-03 0.50457051E-07 43 0.000846 -4.2553530E-06 032 to 033 S4 0.19440563E-01 0.96028342E-03 -0.84564608E-07 43 0.001096 -3.7799151E-06 034 to 035 S4 -0.60553073 0.98311882E-03 -0.18690584E-06 40 0.002047 -0.5076831E-06 036 to 038 S4 0.36708276E-01 0.95577090E-03 0.21875702E-07 66 0.001375 -3.1761190E-06 039 to 040 S4 0.82647512E-01 0.95203109E-03 0.77198775E-07 45 0.001361 -2.9058778E-06 041 to 043 S4 0.19447580E-01 0.95736474E-03 -0.79680507E-08 68 0.001541 -2.3631424E-06 044 to 046 S4 0.30237096E-01 0.95680538E-03 -0.27308193E-08 66 0.001468 -1.8128443E-06 047 to 048 S4 0.59998387E-01 0.96962316E-03 -0.28862853E-06 31 0.001060 -0.9916311E-06 049 to 051 S4 0.40529276E-01 0.95536507E-03 0.20374809E-07 67 0.001983 -1.0150511E-06 052 to 053 S4 0.72904220E-01 0.94224468E-03 0.25347666E-06 30 0.001039 0 054 to 056 SR3 -0.16437023E-01 0.94840277E-03 0.18430266E-06 40 0.001547 0 (stn 54) 1.1052417E-05(stn55) 2.9457907E-05(stn56) 057 to 058 SR3 0.83091393E-01 0.97579514E-03 -0.36657863E-06 19 0.001715 059 to 060 SR3 0.38970365E-01 0.95136388E-03 0.77236642E-07 41 0.001387 061 to 062 SR3 0.10962147E-01 0.96004529E-03 -0.52779303E-07 43 0.001912 063 to 065 SR3 0.53262814E-02 0.96057593E-03 -0.57406289E-07 62 0.001059 066 to 067 SR3 -0.67340513E-02 0.95711703E-03 0.32602246E-08 43 0.001515 068 to 071 SR3 0.26176288E-01 0.95501467E-03 0.16981713E-07 81 0.001365 072 to 074 SR3 -0.33286342E-01 0.96114393E-03 -0.39304776E-07 65 0.001755 075 to 076 SR3 -0.24514632E-01 0.95585560E-03 0.26753495E-07 45 0.002289 077 to 079 SR3 -0.38553928E-01 0.95780877E-03 0.79812009E-08 64 0.001975 080 to 081 SR3 -0.64523829E-02 0.95852101E-03 -0.14973816E-07 44 0.001366 082 to 083 SR3 -0.31874236E-01 0.96253569E-03 -0.53150506E-07 43 0.000775 084 to 085 SR3 -0.22073834E-01 0.95459300E-03 0.38284407E-07 43 0.001037 086 to 092 SR3 -0.68709889E-02 0.95688724E-03 0.42797804E-08 150 0.001549 093 to 095 SR3 0.13907181E-02 0.95680064E-03 0.14985374E-09 65 0.001092 096 to 097 SR3 0.37615123E-02 0.95744099E-03 -0.84529938E-08 40 0.000884 098 to 099 SR3 0.20749048E-01 0.98726272E-03 -0.32570719E-06 48 0.001562 100 to 101 SR3 0.65954377E-02 0.95472218E-03 0.59023049E-08 43 0.001298 102 to 104 SR3 0.57362283E-03 0.95957215E-03 -0.41938467E-07 57 0.000914 105 to 106 SR3 -0.91747190E-02 0.96498194E-03 -0.90946316E-07 28 0.001279 Table 12: Station-dependent-corrected conductivity slope term (F2 + F3 . N), for station number N, and F2 and F3 the conductivity slope and station- dependent correction calibration terms respectively. stn no. (F2 + F3 . N) | stn no. (F2 + F3 . N) | stn no. (F2 + F3 . N) ------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------- 1 TEST 0.98742342E-03 | 37 S4 0.95658030E-03 | 73 SR3 0.95827468E-03 2 S4 0.98716526E-03 | 38 S4 0.95660218E-03 | 74 SR3 0.95823538E-03 3 S4 0.98725884E-03 | 39 S4 0.95504184E-03 | 75 SR3 0.95786211E-03 4 S4 0.98724844E-03 | 40 S4 0.95511904E-03 | 76 SR3 0.95788886E-03 5 S4 0.10322266E-02 | 41 S4 0.95703805E-03 | 77 SR3 0.95842332E-03 6 S4 0.10322266E-02 | 42 S4 0.95703008E-03 | 78 SR3 0.95843131E-03 7 S4 0.98690369E-03 | 43 S4 0.95702211E-03 | 79 SR3 0.95843929E-03 8 S4 0.98693532E-03 | 44 S4 0.95668522E-03 | 80 SR3 0.95732310E-03 9 S4 0.98789931E-03 | 45 S4 0.95668249E-03 | 81 SR3 0.95730813E-03 10 S4 0.98778553E-03 | 46 S4 0.95667976E-03 | 82 SR3 0.95817735E-03 11 S4 0.98768450E-03 | 47 S4 0.95605761E-03 | 83 SR3 0.95812420E-03 12 S4 0.98766663E-03 | 48 S4 0.95576899E-03 | 84 SR3 0.95780889E-03 13 S4 0.98670749E-03 | 49 S4 0.95636344E-03 | 85 SR3 0.95784717E-03 14 S4 0.98672818E-03 | 50 S4 0.95638381E-03 | 86 SR3 0.95725530E-03 15 S4 0.98805001E-03 | 51 S4 0.95640419E-03 | 87 SR3 0.95725958E-03 16 S4 0.98810230E-03 | 52 S4 0.95542546E-03 | 88 SR3 0.95726386E-03 17 S4 0.98815459E-03 | 53 S4 0.95567894E-03 | 89 SR3 0.95726814E-03 18 S4 0.98820687E-03 | 54 TEST 0.95835512E-03 | 90 SR3 0.95727242E-03 19 S4 0.95733896E-03 | 55 SR3 0.95853942E-03 | 91 SR3 0.95727670E-03 20 S4 0.95746798E-03 | 56 SR3 0.95872372E-03 | 92 SR3 0.95728098E-03 21 S4 0.95741133E-03 | 57 SR3 0.95490015E-03 | 93 SR3 0.95681457E-03 22 S4 0.95729571E-03 | 58 SR3 0.95453358E-03 | 94 SR3 0.95681472E-03 23 S4 0.95832904E-03 | 59 SR3 0.95592085E-03 | 95 SR3 0.95681487E-03 24 S4 0.95832197E-03 | 60 SR3 0.95599808E-03 | 96 SR3 0.95662950E-03 25 S4 0.95831489E-03 | 61 SR3 0.95682575E-03 | 97 SR3 0.95662105E-03 26 S4 0.95830781E-03 | 62 SR3 0.95677297E-03 | 98 SR3 0.95534341E-03 27 S4 0.95830074E-03 | 63 SR3 0.95695933E-03 | 99 SR3 0.95501771E-03 28 S4 0.95795483E-03 | 64 SR3 0.95690192E-03 | 100 SR3 0.95531241E-03 29 S4 0.95804456E-03 | 65 SR3 0.95684452E-03 | 101 SR3 0.95531831E-03 30 S4 0.95800507E-03 | 66 SR3 0.95733220E-03 | 102 SR3 0.95529443E-03 31 S4 0.95805553E-03 | 67 SR3 0.95733546E-03 | 103 SR3 0.95525249E-03 32 S4 0.95757736E-03 | 68 SR3 0.95616942E-03 | 104 SR3 0.95521055E-03 33 S4 0.95749279E-03 | 69 SR3 0.95618640E-03 | 105 SR3 0.95543257E-03 34 S4 0.97676403E-03 | 70 SR3 0.95620339E-03 | 106 SR3 0.95534163E-03 35 S4 0.97657712E-03 | 71 SR3 0.95622037E-03 | 36 S4 0.95655843E-03 | 72 SR3 0.95831399E-03 | Table 13: CTD raw data scans, mostly in the vicinity of artificial density inversions, flagged for special treatment. Note that the pressure listed is approximate only; possible actions taken are either to ignore the raw data scans for all further calculations, or to apply a linear interpolation over the region of the bad data scans. Causes of bad data, listed in the last column, are detailed in the CTD methodology. For the raw scan number ranges, the lowest and highest scans numbers are not included in the ignore or interpolate actions. approx stn pressure action # (dbar) raw scan numbers taken reason ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 69 312710-312712 ignore fouling of cond. cell 2 103 267360-267656; 267704-268141 ignore wake effect 2 28; 24 274342-274439; 274610-274752 ignore wake effect 3 110 294797-294846 ignore wake effect 4 189 326120-326134 ignore fouling of cond. cell 4 101 331813-332033 ignore wake effect 17 102 269059-269211; 269417-269509 ignore wake effect 18 53 300375-300727 ignore wake effect 20 3704-3718 163056-163405 ignore fouling of cond. cell 32 600 287236-287282 ignore fouling of cond. cell 34 110-112 378784-378843 ignore fouling of cond. cell 35 28; 26 330110-330137; 330166-330192 ignore fouling of cond. cell 36 131-137 305201-305336 ignore fouling of cond. cell 41 56-77 262645-262993 ignore fouling of cond. cell 45 64-67 237753-237801 interpolate wake effect 47 11 76038-76197 interpolate wake effect 60 256-258 16896-170036 interpolate wake effect 60 320 166669-166671 ignore suspect pressure value 61 259 195087-195110 ignore wake effect 65 56-72 254997-255277 ignore fouling of cond. cell 71 213-216 285966-286010 ignore fouling of cond. cell 94 1012-1039 271068-271531 ignore fouling of cond. cell 95 828-834 257553-257678 ignore fouling of cond. cell 103 236 227094-227097 ignore fouling of cond. cell 105 150; 12 110099-110538; 121628-121631 ignore fouling of cond. cell Table 14: Suspect 2 dbar averages. Note: for suspect salinity values, the following are also suspect: sigma-T, specific volume anomaly, and geopotential anomaly. Suspect Salnity Values suspect 2dbar values(dbar) ----------------- stn # bad questionable reason ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 60,62 58,64,116,118 salinity spike in steep local gradient 2 24 20,22 salinity spike in steep local gradient 3 34,36 98 salinity spike in steep local gradient 4 - 100,110 salinity spike in steep local gradient 10 - 404 salinity spike in steep local gradient 11 - 120,122,124 salinity spike in steep local gradient 15 38 36,40,42,52,54 salinity spike in steep local gradient 16 38 - salinity spike in steep local gradient 17 58 56,60 salinity spike in steep local gradient 18 54,96,108 52,56 salinity spike in steep local gradient 25 - 48 salinity spike in steep local gradient 29 - 46 salinity spike in steep local gradient 35 - 34 salinity spike in steep local gradient 55 - 802-812 possible fouling of conductivity cell 60 - 322 salinity spike in steep local gradient 67 - 54 salinity spike in steep local gradient 68 42 - salinity spike in steep local gradient 71 64 - salinity spike in steep local gradient 72 - 64 salinity spike in steep local gradient 73 - 52 salinity spike in steep local gradient 74 - 60 salinity spike in steep local gradient 76 - 72 salinity spike in steep local gradient 78 - 78 salinity spike in steep local gradient Suspect dissolved Oxygen Values suspect 2dbar values(dbar) ----------------- stn # bad questionable reason ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 64 3230-3258 - 74 1358 - 74 3664 - 74 3760 - 91 462-474 - Table 15a: Suspect 2 dbar-averaged data from near the surface (applies to all parameters other than dissolved oxygen, except where noted). suspect 2dbar suspect 2dbar values(dbar) values(dbar) ----------------- ----------------- stn # bad questionable comment stn # bad questionable comment ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13 - 2 temperature ok 71 - 2 temperature ok 14 - 2 temperature ok 72 - 2 temperature ok 16 - 2 temperature ok 73 - 2 temperature ok 18 - 2 temperature ok 74 - 2 temperature ok 63 - 2 temperature ok Table 15b: Suspect 2 dbar-averaged dissolved oxygen data from near the surface. suspect 2dbar suspect 2dbar suspect 2dbar values(dbar) values(dbar) values(dbar) ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- stn # bad questionable stn # bad questionable stn # bad questionable ------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------ 19 - 2-24 52 - 2 75 - 2-6 20 - 2-14 53 - 2 84 - 2-10 25 - 2-10 67 - 2-14 85 - 2-10 37 - 2-60 69 - 2-12 95 - 2-10 38 - 2-12 70 - 2-12 Table 16: CTD dissolved oxygen calibration coefficients. K1, K2, K3, K4, K5 and K6 are respectively oxygen current slope, oxygen sensor time constant, oxygen current bias, temperature correction term, weighting factor, and pressure correction term. dox is equal to 2.8( (for ( defined as in eqn A2.24 in the CTD methodology); n is the number of samples retained for calibration in each station or station grouping. stn # K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 dox n ------------------------------------------------------------------- 19 10.84 6.0000 -1.520 -0.0997 0.5714 0.0001243 0.0836 22 20 11.15 7.0000 -1.498 -0.1347 0.6687 0.0001101 0.0977 22 21 9.50 8.0000 -1.283 -0.0774 0.2524 0.0001077 0.0922 23 22 9.79 6.5000 -1.318 -0.0857 0.5944 0.0001191 0.1631 24 23 9.85 8.0000 -1.327 -0.0834 0.5259 0.0001162 0.0993 24 24 11.31 6.0000 -1.509 -0.1429 0.5847 0.0001015 0.1042 22 25 10.08 5.0000 -1.428 -0.0586 0.1952 0.0001219 0.0943 23 26 10.25 6.0000 -1.331 -0.1175 0.5731 0.0001038 0.1114 22 27 10.82 5.0000 -1.484 -0.1072 0.3868 0.0001021 0.0833 20 28 - - - - - - - - 29 10.00 5.0000 -1.421 -0.0584 0.0549 0.0001235 0.0821 22 30 13.27 6.3000 -1.765 -0.1997 0.6450 0.0000960 0.0952 23 31 10.20 5.5000 -1.323 -0.1257 0.6496 0.0001120 0.1202 22 32 11.22 6.1000 -1.513 -0.1274 0.6352 0.0001118 0.1145 23 33 9.90 6.5000 -1.343 -0.0834 0.4733 0.0001193 0.1101 23 34 11.42 5.0000 -1.606 -0.1106 0.4598 0.0001185 0.1193 23 35 9.55 5.0000 -1.274 -0.0870 0.3656 0.0001115 0.0900 23 36 10.62 5.7000 -1.462 -0.0981 0.5355 0.0001164 0.1128 22 37 10.99 5.4000 -1.366 -0.1729 0.6951 0.0000956 0.1161 22 38 9.83 8.5000 -1.300 -0.0998 0.4719 0.0001090 0.1785 24 39 11.85 5.5000 -1.693 -0.0893 0.9384 0.0001481 0.1395 24 40 9.52 5.0000 -1.222 -0.1050 0.4554 0.0000956 0.1988 23 41 10.35 5.0000 -1.321 -0.1407 0.5947 0.0000991 0.1704 22 42 10.19 5.0000 -1.365 -0.1027 0.6043 0.0001209 0.1027 23 43 10.46 5.0000 -1.415 -0.0988 0.7758 0.0001334 0.1264 23 44 9.98 5.0000 -1.276 -0.1154 0.7166 0.0001112 0.1620 23 45 8.59 5.0000 -1.092 -0.0568 0.8185 0.0001261 0.1211 23 46 9.40 7.6000 -1.077 -0.1526 0.7112 0.0000860 0.0937 23 47 4.56 8.0000 -0.129 -0.1478 0.5075 0.0000238 0.1100 24 48 9.82 8.0000 -1.220 -0.1357 0.6939 0.0001045 0.1126 15 49 8.69 5.0000 -0.823 -0.2138 0.7031 0.0000645 0.1851 23 50 10.13 5.0000 -1.288 -0.1417 0.7160 0.0001096 0.1802 21 51 9.92 5.7000 -1.265 -0.1289 0.6950 0.0001095 0.1700 23 52 9.38 5.0000 -0.620 -0.3413 0.7189 0.0000302 0.1431 23 53 9.81 5.0000 -1.182 -0.1388 0.6609 0.0000698 0.1821 11 54 - - - - - - - - 55 6.97 5.0000 -0.663 -0.0339 0.7479 0.0002265 0.2867 23 56 10.77 5.0000 -0.784 -0.1082 1.7653 0.0002543 0.2701 11 57 7.77 5.0000 -0.893 -0.0376 0.9939 0.0002700 0.1365 9 58 18.99 5.0000 -1.887 -0.3220 1.0860 -0.0000862 0.2016 12 59 7.80 6.5000 -0.828 -0.1463 0.5008 0.0000699 0.2340 23 60 10.74 5.0000 -1.405 -0.1374 0.6837 0.0000890 0.2835 22 61 8.56 5.4000 -0.752 -0.2324 0.7231 0.0000545 0.2215 22 62 6.83 5.0000 -0.702 -0.1088 0.3474 0.0000582 0.2236 23 63 9.99 5.0000 -1.155 -0.1899 0.7218 0.0000761 0.2073 22 64 10.84 6.0000 -1.542 -0.0947 0.5279 0.0001167 0.1488 23 65 - - - - - - - - 66 - - - - - - - - 67 9.88 8.1000 -1.358 -0.0693 0.5847 0.0001246 0.0932 22 68 10.37 5.0000 -1.398 -0.0993 0.6389 0.0001149 0.2438 24 69 10.21 5.0000 -1.507 -0.0230 0.5929 0.0001541 0.0993 22 70 10.13 5.0000 -1.482 -0.0384 0.6813 0.0001547 0.1931 23 71 10.94 5.0000 -1.563 -0.0789 0.6839 0.0001389 0.1362 23 72 10.30 7.0000 -1.405 -0.0978 0.5148 0.0001129 0.1102 22 73 11.69 5.0000 -1.712 -0.0789 0.6026 0.0001338 0.2344 22 74 11.15 5.0000 -1.618 -0.0774 0.7047 0.0001443 0.1594 23 75 11.19 5.0000 -1.548 -0.1200 0.4974 0.0001064 0.1792 22 76 9.81 5.0000 -1.417 -0.0364 0.4576 0.0001436 0.1843 23 77 11.49 5.0000 -1.668 -0.0842 0.6645 0.0001397 0.1952 21 78 15.42 5.0000 -2.300 -0.1429 0.8493 0.0001510 0.2491 24 79 10.63 5.0000 -1.523 -0.0686 0.7043 0.0001431 0.2986 24 80 15.38 4.8000 -2.256 -0.1733 0.8770 0.0001353 0.3505 23 81 12.66 5.0000 -1.843 -0.1084 0.8944 0.0001435 0.1945 23 82 12.32 5.0000 -1.784 -0.1071 0.8816 0.0001374 0.2613 23 83 11.65 5.0000 -1.704 -0.0841 0.7762 0.0001453 0.1655 22 84 12.00 5.0000 -1.788 -0.0758 0.6134 0.0001404 0.2362 24 85 13.74 4.6000 -2.095 -0.0979 0.5523 0.0001431 0.3313 23 86 12.92 5.0000 -1.943 -0.1079 0.9207 0.0001597 0.1862 23 87 11.10 5.0000 -1.617 -0.0748 0.7939 0.0001402 0.2204 23 88 12.15 5.0000 -1.813 -0.0984 0.9811 0.0001700 0.1533 22 89 13.48 5.0000 -2.058 -0.1033 0.7539 0.0001634 0.2285 24 90 12.95 5.0000 -1.975 -0.0904 0.6741 0.0001597 0.1744 23 91 12.49 5.0000 -1.903 -0.0793 0.6989 0.0001619 0.1489 22 92 11.68 5.0000 -1.778 -0.0751 0.8059 0.0001793 0.1691 21 93 11.85 5.0000 -1.822 -0.0711 0.7029 0.0001812 0.1999 24 94 11.56 5.0000 -1.716 -0.0889 0.9086 0.0001596 0.2278 24 95 11.31 5.0000 -1.685 -0.0770 0.8041 0.0001618 0.1031 24 96 13.48 5.0000 -2.135 -0.0747 0.5469 0.0001834 0.2361 22 97 11.53 5.0000 -1.745 -0.0648 0.6549 0.0001629 0.2228 21 98 11.11 5.0000 -1.627 -0.0804 0.8678 0.0001512 0.1764 24 99 11.13 5.0000 -1.686 -0.0721 0.8706 0.0001874 0.1619 22 100 11.73 5.0000 -1.816 -0.0685 0.6922 0.0001936 0.2216 23 101 10.99 5.0000 -1.610 -0.0631 0.6581 0.0001085 0.2108 24 102 11.61 5.0000 -1.805 -0.0742 0.7840 0.0002055 0.2297 23 103 11.13 5.0000 -1.730 -0.0609 0.7031 0.0002107 0.2480 23 104 10.63 5.0000 -1.549 -0.0857 0.9403 0.0001587 0.1744 24 105 10.31 5.0000 -1.342 -0.0749 0.7824 -0.0000437 0.2751 22 106 7.45 9.8000 -0.946 -0.0346 0.8315 0.0000151 0.2323 15 Table 17: Starting values for CTD dissolved oxygen calibration coefficients prior to iteration, and coefficients varied during iteration (see CTD methodology). Note that coefficients not varied during iteration are held constant at the starting value. stn # K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 coefficients varied -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 19 11.9000 6.0000 -1.300 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 20 11.5000 7.0000 -1.400 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 21 10.1000 8.0000 -1.100 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 22 10.5500 6.5000 -1.100 -0.360E-01 0.850 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 23 10.7500 8.0000 -1.100 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 24 11.5000 6.0000 -1.350 -0.660E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 25 11.3000 5.0000 -1.020 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 26 10.5800 6.0000 -1.200 -0.500E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 27 11.2300 5.0000 -1.300 -0.550E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 28 - - - - - - - 29 11.1000 5.0000 -1.050 -0.380E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 30 13.1500 6.3000 -1.700 -0.400E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 31 10.4000 5.5000 -1.200 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 32 11.5000 6.1000 -1.400 -0.400E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 33 10.6700 6.5000 -1.100 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 34 12.1000 5.0000 -1.410 -0.500E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 35 10.0000 5.0000 -1.100 -0.400E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 36 11.0000 5.7000 -1.300 -0.370E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 37 10.9000 5.4000 -1.300 -0.500E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 38 10.0000 8.5000 -1.250 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 39 12.9000 5.5000 -1.300 -0.360E-01 0.850 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 40 9.4000 5.0000 -1.230 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 41 10.5500 5.0000 -1.100 -0.700E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 42 11.0000 5.0000 -1.100 -0.400E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 43 11.0000 5.0000 -1.150 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 44 10.3500 5.0000 -1.100 -0.360E-01 0.800 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 45 8.5000 5.0000 -1.100 -0.360E-01 0.800 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 46 9.9000 7.6000 -1.000 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 47 4.8500 8.0000 -0.040 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 48 10.4000 8.0000 -1.100 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 49 8.8500 5.0000 -0.850 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 50 10.3500 5.0000 -1.110 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 51 10.5000 5.7000 -1.100 -0.370E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 52 10.8000 5.0000 -0.650 -0.600E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 53 9.6000 5.0000 -0.470 -0.700E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 54 - - - - - - - 55 7.1000 5.0000 -0.650 -0.360E-01 0.740 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 56 10.2000 5.0000 -0.650 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 57 7.8500 5.0000 -0.870 -0.360E-01 0.800 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 58 7.6500 5.0000 -0.570 -0.360E-01 0.670 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 59 8.4000 6.5000 -0.800 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 60 10.8000 5.0000 -1.120 -0.360E-01 0.710 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 61 9.0000 5.4000 -0.680 -1.000E-01 0.740 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 62 7.1500 5.0000 -0.650 -0.600E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 63 10.4000 5.0000 -1.020 -0.500E-01 0.740 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 64 11.4000 6.0000 -1.400 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 65 - - - - - - - 66 - - - - - - - 67 11.4000 8.1000 -1.100 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 68 10.7000 5.0000 -1.100 -0.400E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 69 10.1500 5.0000 -1.520 -0.300E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 70 10.4500 5.0000 -1.450 -0.350E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 71 12.5000 5.0000 -1.100 -0.400E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 72 10.7000 7.0000 -1.200 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 73 12.9500 5.0000 -1.230 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 74 12.6800 5.0000 -1.000 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 75 11.3000 5.0000 -1.200 -0.600E-01 0.700 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 76 10.1500 5.0000 -1.300 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 77 12.4000 5.0000 -1.150 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 78 14.0000 5.0000 -1.600 -0.400E-01 0.690 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 79 10.4000 5.0000 -1.500 -0.500E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 80 13.5000 4.8000 -1.400 -0.500E-01 0.650 0.10000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 81 12.5500 5.0000 -1.200 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 82 12.0500 5.0000 -1.100 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 83 12.5000 5.0000 -1.120 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 84 12.7000 5.0000 -1.120 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 85 12.5000 4.6000 -1.300 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 86 13.3000 5.0000 -1.610 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 87 11.8000 5.0000 -1.210 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 88 13.0000 5.0000 -1.510 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 89 13.5000 5.0000 -1.570 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 90 13.3000 5.0000 -1.520 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 91 13.9000 5.0000 -1.650 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 92 13.2000 5.0000 -1.410 -0.360E-01 0.700 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 93 14.1000 5.0000 -1.600 -0.360E-01 0.600 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 94 12.7000 5.0000 -1.310 -0.450E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 95 12.3000 5.0000 -1.300 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 96 15.4000 5.0000 -1.820 -0.400E-01 0.690 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 97 13.4500 5.0000 -1.420 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 98 12.0000 5.0000 -1.200 -0.400E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 99 12.9000 5.0000 -1.300 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 100 14.4000 5.0000 -1.640 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 101 12.5000 5.0000 -1.300 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 102 12.9000 5.0000 -1.200 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 103 14.3000 5.0000 -1.370 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 104 11.8000 5.0000 -1.200 -0.360E-01 0.750 0.15000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 105 11.3000 5.0000 -1.150 -0.370E-01 0.800 0.20000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 106 7.2000 9.8000 -1.020 -0.200E-01 0.740 0.20000E-03 K1 K3 K4 K5 K6 Table 18: Questionable dissolved oxygen Niskin bottle sample values (not deleted from hydrology data file). rosette rosette stn # position stn # position --------------- ---------------- 1 2,24 44 1 12 1 48 1 15 14 64 13,14 16 14 77 2 17 14 80 9 32 1 101 5 Table 19: Questionable nutrient sample values (not deleted from hydrology data file). PHOSPHATE NITRATE SILICATE stn rosette stn rosette stn rosette no position no position no position ------------- ------------- ------------- 2 2 4 17 4 4 7 21,22,23 14 13 14 13 14 13 17 23 19 23 21 23 21 19 24 22 25 23 27 22 28 whole stn 30 23 32 23 34 23 35 24 36 24 37 24 37 2 40 24 42 11,12 45 1 to 13 50 24 51 23 52 whole stn 52 whole stn 55 22 56 22 60 whole stn 64 24 65 24 67 23 68 23,24 69 23 71 23 71 11 72 23 72 19 73 23,24 74 23,24 75 22,23,24 76 23,24 78 24 83 22 103 22 to 24 Table 20: Laboratory temperatures Tl at the times of nutrient analyses. Note that a mean value of 21.5oC was used for conversion to gravimetric units for WOCE format data (Appendix 2). stn Tl stn Tl stn Tl stn Tl stn Tl stn Tl # (°C) # (°C) # (°C) # (°C) # (°C) # (°C) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 22 21 21.7 41 21 61 22 81 21.5 101 21.5 2 22 22 22 42 21 62 21 82 21.5 102 21.5 3 22 23 21.5 43 21.5 63 21.5 83 22 103 21 4 23 24 22 44 21 64 21 84 22 104 21.5 5 - 25 20.5 45 22 65 22 85 22 105 21.5 6 21 26 21 46 21 66 22 86 22 106 21.5 7 22 27 21 47 21 67 22 87 23 8 20.5 28 21 48 21 68 21.5 88 22.5 9 21 29 21 49 21 69 22 89 22.5 10 22.5 30 21 50 20.5 70 22 90 23.5 11 21.5 31 21.5 51 21.5 71 22 91 22.5 12 21.5 32 21 52 22 72 21.5 92 21.5 13 21.5 33 20.5 53 21 73 21.5 93 22 14 22 34 22 54 19.5 74 22 94 22 15 22 35 21 55 20 75 22 95 21 16 21.5 36 21 56 19.5 76 21.5 96 21.5 17 21 37 21.5 57 21 77 21.5 97 21.5 18 22.5 38 21.5 58 21 78 21.5 98 21.5 19 21 39 21 59 21 79 22 99 22 20 22 40 21 60 22 80 21.5 100 22 Table 21: Dissolved oxygen Niskin bottle samples flagged as -9 for dissolved oxygen calibration. Note that this does not necessarily indicate a bad bottle sample - in many cases, flagging is due to bad CTD dissolved oxygen data. stn rosette stn rosette stn rosette # position # position # position ------------- ------------- ------------- 19 22 46 22 77 19 20 22 48 1 82 20 21 22 49 23 83 19 24 21 50 1,22,23 85 19 26 21,22 52 23 88 18 27 21,22 55 22 90 18 29 12,22 60 22,24 91 18,22 30 22 61 20,24 92 13,23 31 12,23 62 24 96 10 32 23 63 21,24 97 11 34 23 64 22 99 14,18 35 22 67 24 100 14 36 21,23 69 21,24 102 22 37 23 70 24 105 7,8 40 3 71 21 106 17,18 41 22 72 20,23 42 21 73 20 43 24 74 20 44 1 75 20,23 Table 22: Stations containing fluorescence (fl) and photosynthetically active radiation (par) 2 dbar-averaged data. stations with stations with fl data par data ----------------------------- 2 to 4 5 to 12 5 to 12 13 to 76 Table 23: Protected and unprotected reversing thermometers used for cruise AU9404 (serial numbers are listed). PROTECTED THERMOMETERS station rosette position 24 rosette position 12 rosette position 2 numbers thermometers thermometers thermometers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 - 12094,11973 (pos. 13) - 3 to 8 12095,12096 12119,12120 12094,11973 9 to 63 12095,12096 12119,12120 12094,11637 64 to 102 12095,12096 12119,12120 12094,11973 103 to 106 11637,11638 12094,11973 12119,12120 107 11638 (pos. 23); 12095 (pos. 16); 12119 (pos. 5); 11637 (pos. 20); 12094 (pos. 12); 12120 (pos. 2) 12096 (pos. 8); UNPROTECTED THERMOMETERS station rosette position 12 rosette position 2 numbers thermometers thermometers ------------------------------------------------------- 2 11992 (pos. 13) - 3 to 35 11993 11992 36 to 107 11992 11993 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks to all scientific personnel who participated in the cruise, and to the crew of the RSV Aurora Australis. The work was supported by the Department of Environment, Sport and Territories through the CSIRO Climate Change Research Program, the Antarctic Cooperative Research Centre, and the Australian Antarctic Division. REFERENCES Bush, G., 1994. Deployment of upward looking sonar buoys. Centre for Marine Science and Technology, Curtin University of Technology, Western Australia, Report No. C94-4 (unpublished). Dunn, J., 1995a. ADCP processing system. CSIRO Division of Oceanography (unpublished report). Dunn, J., 1995b. Processing of ADCP data at CSIRO Marine Laboratories. CSIRO Division of Oceanography (unpublished report). Gordon, A.L., 1967. Structure of Antarctic waters between 20oW and 170oW. Antarctic Map Folio Series, Folio 6, Bushnell, V. (ed.). American Geophysical Society, New York. Millard, R.C., 1991. CTD Oxygen Calibration Procedure - in WOCE Operations Manual, 1991. WHP Office Report WHPO 91-1, WOCE Report No. 68/91, Woods Hole, Mass., USA. Millard, R.C. and Yang, K., 1993. CTD calibration and processing methods used at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Technical Report No. 93-44. 96 pp. Millard, R., Bond, G. and Toole, J., 1993. Implementation of a titanium strain gauge pressure transducer for CTD applications. Deep-Sea Research I, Vol. 40, No. 5, pp1009-1021. Rintoul, S.R. and Bullister, J.L. (submitted). A late winter section between Tasmania and Antarctica: Circulation, transport and water mass formation. Rosenberg, M., Eriksen, R. and Rintoul, S., 1995a. Aurora Australis marine science cruise AU9309/AU9391 - oceanographic field measurements and analysis. Antarctic Cooperative Research Centre, Research Report No. 2, March 1995. 103pp. Rosenberg, M., Eriksen, R., Bell, S., Bindoff, N. and Rintoul, S., 1995b. Aurora Australis marine science cruise AU9407 - oceanographic field measurements and analysis. Antarctic Cooperative Research Centre, Research Report No. 6, July 1995. 97 pp. Ryan, T., 1995. Data Quality Manual for the data logged instrumentation aboard the RSV Aurora Australis.. Australian Antarctic Division, unpublished manuscript, second edition, April 1995. APPENDIX 1 CTD INSTRUMENT CALIBRATIONS Table A1.1: Calibration coefficients and calibration dates for CTD serial numbers 1103 and 1193 (unit nos 7 and 5 respectively) used during RSV Aurora Australis cruise AU9404. Note that an additional pressure bias term due to the station dependent surface pressure offset exists for each station (eqn A2.1 in the CTD methodology). Also note that platinum temperature calibrations are for the ITS-90 scale. CTD serial 1103 (unit no. 7) | CTD serial 1193 (unit no. 5) coefficient value of coefficient | coefficient value of coefficient --------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------- pressure calibration coefficients | pressure calibration coefficients | CSIRO Calibration Facility - 13/09/1994 | CSIRO Calibration Facility - 13/09/1994 pcal0 -2.043035e+01 | pcal0 -9.273027 pcal1 1.002658e-01 | pcal1 1.008386e-01 pcal2 6.393209e-9 | pcal2 0.0 pcal3 0.0 | pcal3 0.0 | | platinum temperature calibration coefficients | platinum temperature calibration coefficients | CSIRO Calibration Facility - 23/09/1994 | CSIRO Calibration Facility - 23/09/1994 (with | additional offset term from cruise thermometer data) Tcal0 0.70500e-02 | Tcal0 -0.62088e-02 - 0.007 Tcal1 0.50000e-03 | Tcal1 0.49880e-03 Tcal2 0.35049e-11 | Tcal2 0.27541e-11 | | pressure temperature calibration coefficients | pressure temperature calibration coefficients | General Oceanics - July 1993 | General Oceanics - July 1993 | Tpcal0 1.062859e+02 | Tpcal0 2.238391e+02 Tpcal1 -2.117688e-03 | Tpcal1 -1.155218e-02 Tpcal2 2.597323e-09 | Tpcal2 2.418139e-07 Tpcal3 0.000000 | Tpcal3 -2.007116e-12 | | coefficients for temperature correction to | coefficients for temperature correction to pressure | pressure | General Oceanics - July 1993 | General Oceanics - July 1993 | T0 21.50 | T0 22.00 S1 -5.9127e-07 | S1 -2.3599e-06 S2 -3.2430e-01 | S2 -1.6700e-01 preliminary polynomial coefficients applied to fluorescence (fl) and photosynthetically active radiation (par) raw digitiser counts (supplied by manufacturer) f0 -2.699918e+01 f1 8.239746e-04 f2 -2.071294e-22 par0 -4.499860 par1 1.373290e-04 par2 -3.452156e-23 APPENDIX 2: WOCE DATA FORMAT ADDENDUM A2.1 INTRODUCTION This Appendix is relevant only to data submitted to the WHP Office. For WOCE format data, file format descriptions as detailed earlier in this report should be ignored. Data files submitted to the WHP Office are in the standard WOCE format as specified in Joyce et al. (1991). A2.2 CTD 2 DBAR-AVERAGED DATA FILES * CTD 2 dbar-averaged file format is as per Table 3.12 of Joyce et al. (1991), except that measurements are centered on even pressure bins (with first value at 2 dbar). * CTD temperature and salinity are reported to the third decimal place only. * Files are named as in the CTD methodology, except that for WOCE format data the suffix ".all" is replaced with ".ctd". * The quality flags for CTD data are defined in Table A2.1. Data quality information is detailed in earlier sections of this report. A2.3 HYDROLOGY DATA FILES * Hydrology data file format is as per Table 3.7 of Joyce et al. (1991), with quality flags defined in Tables A2.2 and A2.3. * Files are named as in the CTD methodology, except that for WOCE format data the suffix ".bot" is replaced by ".sea". * The total value of nitrate+nitrite only is listed. * Silicate and nitrate+nitrite are reported to the first decimal place only. * CTD temperature (including theta), CTD salinity and bottle salinity are all reported to the third decimal place only. * CTD temperature (including theta), CTD pressure and CTD salinity are all derived from upcast CTD burst data; CTD dissolved oxygen is derived from downcast 2 dbar-averaged data. * Raw CTD pressure values are not reported. * SAMPNO is equal to the rosette position of the Niskin bottle. A2.4 CONVERSION OF UNITS FOR DISSOLVED OXYGEN AND NUTRIENTS A2.4.1 Dissolved oxygen Niskin bottle data For the WOCE format files, all Niskin bottle dissolved oxygen concentration values have been converted from volumetric units µmol/l to gravimetric units µmol/kg, as follows. Concentration C(sub k) in µmol/kg is given by C(sub k) = 1000 C(sub l) / rho(theta,s,0) (eqn A2.1) where C(sub l) is the concentration in µmol/l, 1000 is a conversion factor, and rho(T(sub 1),s,0) is the potential density at zero pressure and at the potential temperature where potential temperature is given by theta = theta(T,s,p) (eqn A2.2) for the in situ temperature T, salinity s and pressure p values at which the Niskin bottle was fired. Note that T, s and p are upcast CTD burst data averages. CTD data In the WOCE format files, CTD dissolved oxygen data are converted to µmol/kg by the same method as above, except that T, s and p in eqns A2.1 and A2.2 are CTD 2 dbar-averaged data. A2.4.2 Nutrients For the WOCE format files, all Niskin bottle nutrient concentration values have been converted from volumetric units µmol/l to gravimetric units µmol/kg using C(sub k) = 1000 C(sub l) / rho(Tl,s,0) (eqn A2.3) where 1000 is a conversion factor, and ((T(sub l),s,0) is the water density in the hydrology laboratory at the laboratory temperature T(sub l) and at zero pressure. Note that T(sub l) =21.5°C was used for all stations. Upcast CTD burst data averages are used for s. Table A2.1: Definition of quality flags for CTD data (after Table 3.11 in Joyce et al., 1991). These flags apply both to CTD data in the 2 dbar-averaged *.ctd files, and to upcast CTD burst data in the *.sea files. flag definition ---- --------------------------------- 1 not calibrated with water samples 2 acceptable measurement 3 questionable measurement 4 bad measurement 5 measurement not reported 6 interpolated value 7,8 these flags are not used 9 parameter not sampled Table A2.2: Definition of quality flags for Niskin bottles (i.e. parameter BTLNBR in *.sea files) (after Table 3.8 in Joyce et al., 1991). flag definition ---- ------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 this flag is not used 2 no problems noted 3 bottle leaking, as noted when rosette package returned on deck 4 bottle did not trip correctly 5 bottle leaking, as noted from data analysis 6 bottle not fired at correct depth, due to misfiring of rosette pylon 7,8 these flags are not used 9 samples not drawn from this bottle Table A2.3: Definition of quality flags for water samples in *.sea files (after Table 3.9 in Joyce et al., 1991). flag definition ---- ------------------------------------- 1 this flag is not used 2 acceptable measurement 3 questionable measurement 4 bad measurement 5 measurement not reported 7 manual autoanalyser peak measurement 6,8 these flags are not used 9 parameter not sampled A2.5 STATION INFORMATION FILES * File format is as per section 2.2.2 of Joyce et al. (1991), and files are named as in the CTD methodology, except that for WOCE format data the suffix ".sta" is replaced by ".sum". * All depths are calculated using a uniform speed of sound through the water column of 1498 ms-1. Reported depths are as measured from the water surface. Missing depths are due to interference of the ship's bow thrusters with the echo sounder signal. * An altimeter attached to the base of the rosette frame (approximately at the same vertical position as the CTD sensors) measures the elevation (or height above the bottom) in metres. The elevation value at each station is recorded manually from the CTD data stream display at the bottom of each CTD downcast. Motion of the ship due to waves can cause an error in these manually recorded values of up to µ 3 m. * Lineout (i.e. meter wheel readings of the CTD winch) were unavailable. REFERENCES Joyce, T., Corry, C. and Stalcup, M., 1991. Requirements for WOCE Hydrographic Programme Data Reporting. WHP Office Report WHPO 90-1, Revision 1, WOCE Report No. 67/91, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. 71 pp. CFC-11 AND CFC-12 MEASUREMENTS ON AU9404 (WOCE SR3 and S4) (John Bullister) 27 April 1997 CFC Sampling Procedures and Data Processing CFC water samples were usually the first samples collected from the 10 liter bottles. Care was taken to co-ordinate the sampling of CFCs with other gas samples to minimize the time between the inital opening of each bottle and the completion of sample drawing. In most cases, all dissolved gas samples were collected within several minutes of the initial opening of each bottle. CFC samples were collected in 100 ml precision glass syringes and held immersed in a water bath until processing. For air sampling, a ~100 meter length of 3/8" OD Dekaron tubing was run from the CFC lab van to the bow of the ship. Air was sucked through this line into the CFC van using an Air Cadet pump. The air was compressed in the pump, and the downstream pressure held at about 1.5 atm using a back pressure regulator. A tee allowed a flow (~100 cc/min) of the compressed air to be directed to the gas sample valves, while the bulk of the air (>7 liter/minute) was vented through the back pressure regulator. Concentrations of CFC-11 and CFC-12 in air samples, seawater and gas standards on the cruise were measured by shipboard electron capture gas chromatography, using techniques similiar to those described by Bullister and Weiss (1988). The CFC analytical system functioned well during this expedition. Analytical blanks for the water stripping process were determined and subtracted from the measured water sample concentrations. Both gas and water sample analytical blanks were very low for most of the expedition. In a few cases, for very low concentration water samples and a higher than average water sample analytical blank, subtraction of the water sample CFC analytical blank from the measured CFC water sample concentration yielded negative reported concentration values. Concentrations of CFC-11 and CFC-12 in air, seawater samples and gas standards are reported relative to the SIO93 calibration scale (Cunnold, et. al., 1994). CFC concentrations in air and standard gas are reported in units of mole fraction CFC in dry gas, and are typically in the parts-per-trillion (ppt) range. Dissolved CFC concentrations are given in units of picomoles of CFC per kg seawater (pmol/kg). CFC concentrations in air and seawater samples were determined by fitting their chromatographic peak areas to multi-point calibration curves, generated by pressurizing sample loops and injecting known volumes of gas from a CFC working standard (PMEL cylinder 33790) into the analytical instrument. The concentrations of CFC-11 and CFC-12 in this working standard were calibrated versus a primary CFC standard (36743) (Bullister, 1984) before the cruise and a secondary standard (32386) before and after the cruise. No measurable drift between the working standards could be detected during this interval. Full range calibration curves were run 11 times during the cruise. Single injections of a fixed volume of standard gas at one atmosphere were run much more frequently (at intervals of 1 to 2 hours) to monitor short term changes in detector sensitivity. We estimate a precision (1 standard deviation) for dissolved CFC measurements on this cruise of about 1%, or 0.005 pmol/kg, whichever is greater (see listing of replicate samples given at the end of this report). As expected, low (~0.01 pmol/kg) but non-zero CFC concentrations were measured in deep samples along the northern ends of the SR3 section. Deep and bottom CFC concentrations increased significantly southward along the section. It is likely that most of the deep CFC signals observed on SR3, which are strongly correlated with elevated dissolved oxygen and cold temperatures, are due to deep ventilation processes in this high latitude region, and not simply blanks due of the sampling and analytical procedures. The measured levels of CFC in deep water samples on the northern end of SR3 are considerable higher than those found on WOCE sections in the low latitude Pacific and Indian Oceans. For example, typical measured deep water CFC measurements along WOCE section I2 (at about 8S) were ~0.003 pmol/kg for CFC-11 and <0.001 for CFC-12. Since no "zero" concentration CFC water was present anywhere along SR3 or SR4, and an earlier occupation of SR3 in 1991 showed similar low levels of CFCs along the northern end of this section, no corrections for 'sampling blanks' have been applied to the reported CFC signals for SR3 or S4. A number of CFC samples (from a total of ~1500) had clearly anomolous CFC-11 and/or CFC-12 concentrations relative to adjacent samples. These appeared to occur more or less randomly, and were not clearly associated with other features in the water column (eg. elevated oxygen concentrations, salinity or temperature features, etc.). This suggests that the high values were due to isolated low- level CFC contamination events. These samples are included in this report and are flagged as either 3 (questionable) or 4 (bad) measurements. 34 analyses of CFC-11 were assigned a flag of 3 and 49 analyses of CFC-12 were assigned a flag of 3. 82 analyses of CFC-11 were assigned a flag of 4 and 70 CFC-12 samples assigned a flag of 4. In addition to the file of mean CFC concentrations reported for each water sample (keyed to the unique station:sample ID), tables of the following are included in this report: Table 2a. AU9404 Replicate dissolved CFC-11 analyses Table 2b. AU9404 Replicate dissolved CFC-12 analyses Table 3. AU9404 CFC air measurements Table 4. AU9404 CFC air measurements interpolated to station locations A value of -9.0 is used for missing values in the listings. References Bullister, J.L., 1984. Anthropogenic Chlorofluoromethanes as Tracers of Ocean Circulation and Mixing Processes: Measurement and Calibration Techniques and Studies in the Greenland and Norwegian Seas. Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. Calif. San Diego, 172 pp. Bullister, J.L. and R.F. Weiss, 1988. Determination of CCl3F and CCl2F2 in seawater and air. Deep-Sea Research, 35 (5), 839-853. Cunnold, D.M., P.J. Fraser, R.F. Weiss, R.G. Prinn, P.G. Simmonds, B.R. Miller, F.N. Alyea, and A.J.Crawford, 1994. Global trends and annual releases of CCl3F and CCl2F2 estimated from ALE/GAGE and other measurements from July 1978 to June 1991. J. Geophys. Res., 99, 1107-1126. Table 2a: AU9404 Replicate dissolved CFC-11 analyses CFC-11 CFC-11 CFC-11 Stn Niskin (pmol/kg) Stn Niskin (pmol/kg) Stn Niskin (pmol/kg) --- ------ --------- --- ------ --------- --- ------ --------- 1 2 0.059 18 204 0.480 35 24 6.310 1 2 0.090 18 204 0.481 35 24 6.268 4 1 1.434 19 24 6.419 35 107 0.150 4 1 1.444 19 24 6.378 35 107 0.155 4 11 0.155 21 13 0.138 37 1 1.546 4 11 0.151 21 13 0.135 37 1 1.560 4 13 0.326 21 24 6.406 37 2 1.226 4 13 0.360 21 24 6.396 37 2 1.261 4 18 6.734 23 1 1.631 37 11 0.073 4 18 6.843 23 1 1.620 37 11 0.078 9 9 0.561 23 20 0.645 37 16 0.195 9 9 0.564 23 20 0.617 37 16 0.202 10 1 1.523 23 24 6.398 37 24 6.379 10 1 1.528 23 24 6.398 37 24 6.371 10 13 0.459 23 204 0.425 38 1 1.499 10 13 0.459 23 204 0.441 38 1 1.501 10 24 6.203 25 23 6.216 39 1 1.784 10 24 6.406 25 23 6.200 39 1 1.784 12 11 0.329 25 204 0.284 39 6 0.221 12 11 0.321 25 204 0.290 39 6 0.222 14 2 1.480 26 11 0.094 39 11 0.105 14 2 1.520 26 11 0.096 39 11 0.107 14 5 0.668 26 11 0.097 39 18 0.334 14 5 0.645 26 11 0.084 39 18 0.340 14 6 0.548 26 12 0.107 39 23 5.562 14 6 0.577 26 12 0.115 39 23 5.529 14 6 0.571 26 12 0.119 40 11 0.095 14 9 0.397 26 12 0.103 40 11 0.097 14 9 0.396 26 13 0.162 41 1 1.390 14 11 0.279 26 13 0.168 41 1 1.385 14 11 0.265 26 13 0.154 41 2 0.886 14 13 0.133 26 15 0.195 41 2 0.879 14 13 0.135 26 15 0.220 41 11 0.092 14 21 0.905 26 15 0.230 41 11 0.084 14 21 0.926 26 15 0.189 41 14 0.104 14 122 3.726 26 15 0.225 41 14 0.103 14 122 3.778 31 5 0.197 41 16 0.176 18 1 1.345 31 5 0.190 41 16 0.201 18 1 1.295 31 24 6.464 41 24 6.387 18 2 0.916 31 24 6.491 41 24 6.397 18 2 0.986 32 11 0.123 41 107 0.091 18 6 0.207 32 11 0.123 41 107 0.092 18 6 0.247 32 11 0.132 41 222 2.998 18 8 0.152 33 1 1.661 41 222 3.009 18 8 0.159 33 1 1.641 42 8 0.062 18 16 0.259 33 12 0.104 42 8 0.061 18 16 0.238 33 12 0.110 43 11 0.078 18 20 0.880 33 24 6.252 43 11 0.079 18 20 0.832 33 24 6.271 43 17 0.224 18 24 6.303 35 1 2.329 43 17 0.225 18 24 6.518 35 1 2.339 43 107 0.140 18 122 4.880 35 11 0.085 43 107 0.144 18 122 4.890 35 11 0.066 45 2 0.631 45 2 0.596 45 5 0.305 49 107 0.354 61 24 6.306 45 5 0.308 49 107 0.357 61 24 6.250 45 8 0.154 50 1 1.575 62 1 1.815 45 8 0.143 50 1 1.577 62 1 1.805 45 11 0.150 50 6 0.434 63 2 2.139 45 11 0.142 50 6 0.405 63 2 2.135 45 14 0.245 50 11 0.090 63 12 0.337 45 14 0.248 50 11 0.089 63 12 0.334 45 20 0.558 50 16 0.216 63 222 4.159 45 20 0.583 50 16 0.212 63 222 4.140 45 222 3.436 50 24 5.514 65 1 2.221 45 222 3.621 50 24 5.571 65 1 2.220 47 1 0.179 51 1 1.492 65 24 6.235 47 1 0.177 51 1 1.496 65 24 6.264 47 20 4.101 51 5 0.434 67 1 1.857 47 20 4.084 51 5 0.438 67 1 1.848 48 1 0.976 51 10 0.090 67 17 0.242 48 1 1.014 51 10 0.089 67 17 0.225 48 2 0.901 51 17 0.377 67 107 0.121 48 2 0.900 51 17 0.375 67 107 0.123 48 6 0.333 51 24 5.237 68 9 0.064 48 6 0.335 51 24 5.206 68 9 0.061 48 9 0.170 51 103 1.036 68 11 0.071 48 9 0.168 51 103 1.028 68 11 0.068 48 11 0.170 54 1 0.104 69 1 1.501 48 11 0.175 54 1 0.102 69 1 1.503 48 11 0.173 54 6 0.104 69 6 0.160 48 11 0.172 54 6 0.105 69 6 0.151 48 13 0.211 54 11 0.105 69 11 0.065 48 13 0.210 54 11 0.118 69 11 0.066 48 15 4.573 54 12 0.106 69 17 0.312 48 15 4.615 54 12 0.108 69 17 0.313 48 204 0.564 54 18 0.109 69 20 1.206 48 204 0.566 54 18 0.106 69 20 1.221 49 1 1.147 54 23 0.110 69 23 6.537 49 1 1.150 54 23 0.109 69 23 6.488 49 5 0.618 54 24 0.112 69 103 0.593 49 5 0.616 54 24 0.108 69 103 0.593 49 9 0.211 54 24 0.129 71 1 1.288 49 9 0.209 54 24 0.105 71 1 1.284 49 11 0.129 55 11 4.834 71 11 0.051 49 11 0.129 55 11 4.862 71 11 0.055 49 13 0.201 55 18 4.124 71 20 1.296 49 13 0.198 55 18 4.110 71 20 1.289 49 15 0.254 55 24 6.432 71 24 6.049 49 15 0.250 55 24 6.405 71 24 6.020 49 17 0.429 60 1 2.348 73 1 0.269 49 17 0.425 60 1 2.384 73 1 0.271 49 21 1.756 60 1 2.360 73 8 0.050 49 21 1.755 61 6 1.094 73 8 0.050 49 24 4.649 61 6 1.099 73 10 0.061 49 24 4.692 61 11 0.430 73 10 0.058 49 103 1.021 61 11 0.433 73 11 0.071 49 103 1.034 73 11 0.069 73 17 0.705 85 20 4.731 97 1 0.005 73 17 0.701 85 20 4.735 97 1 0.005 73 23 5.624 86 8 0.061 97 14 3.392 73 23 5.676 86 8 0.064 97 14 3.393 73 103 0.130 86 11 0.209 97 18 3.762 73 103 0.128 86 11 0.230 97 18 3.768 74 1 0.246 86 17 2.235 97 204 0.008 74 1 0.246 86 17 2.221 97 204 0.010 74 12 0.123 86 23 4.428 98 1 0.004 74 12 0.120 86 23 4.491 98 1 0.006 74 24 5.503 89 6 0.026 98 105 0.006 74 24 5.531 89 6 0.024 98 105 0.006 75 1 0.239 89 24 4.559 99 10 0.691 75 1 0.267 89 24 4.549 99 10 0.689 75 5 0.081 89 105 0.022 99 15 3.683 75 5 0.080 89 105 0.021 99 15 3.662 75 11 0.083 89 204 0.027 99 20 3.845 75 11 0.084 89 204 0.021 99 20 3.839 75 16 0.554 91 10 0.085 99 105 0.037 75 16 0.559 91 10 0.083 99 105 0.041 75 23 5.604 91 15 0.911 101 10 0.632 75 23 5.605 91 15 0.915 101 10 0.625 76 1 0.135 91 105 0.011 101 15 3.559 76 1 0.137 91 105 0.010 101 15 3.556 76 19 1.163 92 204 0.030 101 20 3.655 76 19 1.184 92 204 0.029 101 20 3.667 76 24 5.573 93 6 0.012 101 105 0.113 76 24 5.583 93 6 0.020 101 105 0.118 77 1 0.137 93 16 2.203 103 1 0.006 77 1 0.153 93 16 2.181 103 1 0.003 77 6 0.090 93 20 3.621 103 6 0.009 77 6 0.077 93 20 3.607 103 6 0.007 77 18 1.569 94 6 0.026 103 16 0.972 77 18 1.556 94 6 0.025 103 16 0.976 77 24 5.500 95 1 0.006 103 21 2.974 77 24 5.472 95 1 0.005 103 21 2.981 79 1 0.073 95 1 0.006 105 23 2.988 79 1 0.068 95 9 0.143 105 23 2.983 79 10 0.069 95 9 0.143 79 10 0.064 95 16 3.227 81 13 0.499 95 16 3.242 81 13 0.494 95 19 3.687 81 19 4.397 95 19 3.664 81 19 4.412 95 23 3.732 83 2 0.041 95 23 3.736 83 2 0.037 95 103 0.011 83 5 0.034 95 103 0.012 83 5 0.035 95 105 0.024 85 2 0.022 95 105 0.026 85 2 0.017 96 105 0.009 85 8 0.039 96 105 0.013 85 8 0.042 96 204 0.006 85 15 1.043 96 204 0.008 85 15 1.041 CFC-12 CFC-12 CFC-12 Stn Niskin (pmol/kg) Stn Niskin (pmol/kg) Stn Niskin (pmol/kg) --- ------ --------- --- ------ --------- --- ------ --------- 1 2 0.037 18 204 0.226 29 2 0.462 1 2 0.045 18 204 0.208 29 2 0.449 4 1 0.638 21 1 0.840 29 11 0.074 4 1 0.647 21 1 0.817 29 11 0.076 4 13 0.167 21 10 0.055 29 24 3.066 4 13 0.185 21 10 0.058 29 24 3.078 4 18 3.199 21 13 0.090 31 1 0.486 4 18 3.283 21 13 0.085 31 1 0.483 9 9 0.252 21 24 3.285 31 5 0.104 9 9 0.266 21 24 3.219 31 5 0.097 10 1 0.680 23 1 0.719 31 14 0.068 10 1 0.693 23 1 0.753 31 14 0.061 10 24 2.856 23 12 0.046 31 18 0.144 10 24 2.916 23 12 0.050 31 18 0.141 12 11 0.150 23 12 0.054 31 24 3.068 12 11 0.165 23 16 0.116 31 24 3.008 14 2 0.659 23 16 0.130 32 11 0.077 14 2 0.684 23 16 0.120 32 11 0.068 14 5 0.288 23 20 0.292 32 11 0.072 14 5 0.303 23 20 0.275 33 1 0.764 14 6 0.257 23 24 3.308 33 1 0.752 14 6 0.242 23 24 3.414 33 11 0.082 14 6 0.240 23 204 0.227 33 11 0.051 14 9 0.164 23 204 0.197 33 12 0.069 14 9 0.166 23 204 0.204 33 12 0.061 14 11 0.107 25 1 0.565 33 18 0.147 14 11 0.116 25 1 0.580 33 18 0.153 14 21 0.410 25 12 0.058 33 24 3.058 14 21 0.426 25 12 0.060 33 24 3.061 14 122 1.776 25 23 3.166 35 1 1.077 14 122 1.772 25 23 3.150 35 1 1.092 18 1 0.590 25 107 0.048 35 11 0.040 18 1 0.610 25 107 0.053 35 11 0.040 18 2 0.391 25 204 0.132 35 24 3.030 18 2 0.432 25 204 0.123 35 24 2.954 18 6 0.111 26 11 0.043 35 107 0.071 18 6 0.110 26 11 0.041 35 107 0.091 18 8 0.072 26 11 0.040 37 1 0.696 18 8 0.069 26 11 0.031 37 1 0.691 18 10 0.049 26 12 0.066 37 2 0.567 18 10 0.043 26 12 0.063 37 2 0.553 18 14 0.057 26 12 0.060 37 11 0.043 18 14 0.061 26 12 0.066 37 11 0.043 18 16 0.118 26 13 0.065 37 16 0.100 18 16 0.110 26 13 0.058 37 16 0.107 18 18 0.156 26 13 0.062 37 24 3.055 18 18 0.158 26 15 0.105 37 24 3.017 18 20 0.371 26 15 0.093 38 1 0.658 18 20 0.379 26 15 0.095 38 1 0.667 18 24 3.035 26 15 0.124 39 1 0.820 18 24 3.170 26 15 0.105 39 1 0.799 18 122 2.350 29 1 1.007 39 6 0.104 18 122 2.291 29 1 1.027 39 6 0.113 39 11 0.054 48 9 0.080 54 1 0.051 39 11 0.061 48 9 0.086 54 1 0.050 39 18 0.164 48 11 0.084 54 6 0.056 39 18 0.163 48 11 0.082 54 6 0.053 39 23 2.607 48 11 0.082 54 11 0.050 39 23 2.630 48 11 0.082 54 11 0.067 40 11 0.050 48 13 0.095 54 12 0.059 40 11 0.065 48 13 0.102 54 12 0.059 41 1 0.614 48 15 2.234 54 18 0.063 41 1 0.604 48 15 2.221 54 18 0.062 41 2 0.391 48 204 0.264 54 23 0.059 41 2 0.392 48 204 0.252 54 23 0.054 41 11 0.055 49 1 0.509 54 24 0.062 41 11 0.043 49 1 0.506 54 24 0.062 41 14 0.060 49 5 0.276 54 24 0.062 41 14 0.056 49 5 0.276 54 24 0.062 41 16 0.100 49 9 0.094 55 11 2.284 41 16 0.088 49 9 0.106 55 11 2.294 41 24 3.075 49 11 0.060 55 18 1.943 41 24 3.062 49 11 0.057 55 18 1.979 41 107 0.050 49 13 0.089 55 24 3.090 41 107 0.051 49 13 0.079 55 24 3.129 41 222 1.408 49 15 0.116 60 1 1.104 41 222 1.413 49 15 0.112 60 1 1.089 42 8 0.035 49 17 0.196 60 1 1.097 42 8 0.037 49 17 0.201 61 1 0.805 43 1 0.270 49 21 0.818 61 1 0.792 43 1 0.274 49 21 0.809 61 6 0.489 43 11 0.047 49 24 2.191 61 6 0.490 43 11 0.034 49 24 2.206 61 11 0.207 43 17 0.109 49 103 0.451 61 11 0.208 43 17 0.104 49 103 0.465 61 24 3.113 43 107 0.068 49 107 0.161 61 24 3.112 43 107 0.067 49 107 0.180 62 1 0.832 45 2 0.283 50 1 0.698 62 1 0.832 45 2 0.290 50 1 0.728 63 2 1.000 45 5 0.150 50 6 0.198 63 2 1.021 45 5 0.132 50 6 0.190 63 12 0.164 45 8 0.078 50 11 0.042 63 12 0.173 45 8 0.069 50 11 0.039 63 222 2.007 45 14 0.116 50 16 0.100 63 222 2.019 45 14 0.113 50 16 0.109 65 1 1.044 45 20 0.253 50 24 2.689 65 1 1.041 45 20 0.242 50 24 2.652 65 24 3.014 45 222 1.728 51 1 0.660 65 24 3.030 45 222 1.694 51 1 0.658 67 1 0.869 47 1 0.089 51 5 0.205 67 1 0.871 47 1 0.081 51 5 0.207 67 17 0.119 47 20 2.099 51 17 0.180 67 17 0.113 47 20 2.109 51 17 0.180 67 107 0.066 48 1 0.443 51 24 2.552 67 107 0.070 48 1 0.434 51 24 2.563 68 9 0.036 48 6 0.160 51 103 0.465 68 9 0.037 48 6 0.174 51 103 0.456 68 11 0.032 76 19 0.542 91 105 0.011 68 11 0.043 76 19 0.556 91 105 0.013 69 1 0.711 76 24 2.701 92 204 0.025 69 1 0.693 76 24 2.702 92 204 0.019 69 6 0.077 77 1 0.084 93 2 0.015 69 6 0.077 77 1 0.082 93 2 0.024 69 11 0.034 77 6 0.049 93 6 0.013 69 11 0.035 77 6 0.046 93 6 0.015 69 17 0.145 77 18 0.734 93 16 1.066 69 17 0.145 77 18 0.737 93 16 1.077 69 20 0.537 77 24 2.680 93 20 1.884 69 20 0.561 77 24 2.675 93 20 1.838 69 23 3.136 79 1 0.047 94 6 0.024 69 23 3.109 79 1 0.043 94 6 0.017 69 103 0.292 79 10 0.040 95 1 0.014 69 103 0.276 79 10 0.037 95 1 0.014 71 1 0.587 81 13 0.228 95 1 0.013 71 1 0.600 81 13 0.228 95 9 0.067 71 5 0.095 81 19 2.149 95 9 0.074 71 5 0.093 81 19 2.136 95 16 1.625 71 11 0.027 83 2 0.025 95 16 1.619 71 11 0.034 83 2 0.026 95 19 1.831 71 20 0.589 83 5 0.024 95 19 1.823 71 20 0.580 83 5 0.023 95 23 1.839 71 24 2.921 83 11 0.041 95 23 1.914 71 24 2.923 83 11 0.036 95 103 0.014 73 1 0.142 83 222 2.767 95 103 0.015 73 1 0.142 83 222 2.754 95 105 0.018 73 8 0.043 85 2 0.018 95 105 0.017 73 8 0.040 85 2 0.005 96 105 0.013 73 10 0.040 85 15 0.496 96 105 0.009 73 10 0.039 85 15 0.477 96 204 0.007 73 11 0.048 85 20 2.238 96 204 0.007 73 11 0.048 85 20 2.237 97 1 0.006 73 17 0.329 86 8 0.036 97 1 0.010 73 17 0.335 86 8 0.033 97 18 1.936 73 23 2.734 86 11 0.107 97 18 1.888 73 23 2.662 86 11 0.103 97 204 0.007 73 103 0.076 86 17 1.070 97 204 0.013 73 103 0.070 86 17 1.032 98 1 0.009 74 1 0.132 86 23 2.230 98 1 0.011 74 1 0.140 86 23 2.215 98 105 0.013 74 12 0.068 89 6 0.012 98 105 0.008 74 12 0.066 89 6 0.003 99 10 0.326 75 1 0.129 89 24 2.240 99 10 0.304 75 1 0.135 89 24 2.232 99 15 1.821 75 5 0.058 89 105 0.006 99 15 1.855 75 5 0.061 89 105 0.008 99 20 2.027 75 16 0.264 89 204 0.006 99 20 1.998 75 16 0.267 89 204 0.003 99 105 0.025 75 23 2.687 91 10 0.050 99 105 0.024 75 23 2.698 91 10 0.047 101 10 0.306 76 1 0.076 91 15 0.435 101 10 0.307 76 1 0.077 91 15 0.421 101 15 1.787 103 16 0.478 101 15 1.761 103 16 0.483 101 20 1.857 103 21 1.542 101 20 1.887 103 21 1.569 101 105 0.058 105 23 1.599 101 105 0.061 105 23 1.615 103 1 0.011 103 1 0.008 Table 3: AU9404 CFC Air Measurements Time F11 F12 Date (hhmm) Latitude Longitude PPT PPT --------- ---- --------- ---------- ----- ----- 19 Dec 94 2338 57 26.6 S 127 53.5 E 257.0 515.0 19 Dec 94 2350 57 26.6 S 127 53.5 E 257.3 507.3 20 Dec 94 0015 57 26.6 S 127 53.5 E 257.0 509.7 20 Dec 94 0033 57 26.6 S 127 53.5 E 257.3 511.4 22 Dec 94 0704 62 00.3 S 118 00.4 E 257.7 510.3 22 Dec 94 0716 62 00.3 S 118 00.4 E 258.0 508.3 22 Dec 94 0729 62 00.3 S 118 00.4 E 257.5 511.3 22 Dec 94 0741 62 00.3 S 118 00.4 E 258.1 508.5 5 Jan 95 0335 63 16.0 S 113 13.0 E 258.4 509.5 5 Jan 95 0347 63 16.0 S 113 13.0 E 259.8 507.2 5 Jan 95 0359 63 16.0 S 113 13.0 E 257.4 508.8 5 Jan 95 0412 63 16.0 S 113 13.0 E 257.7 509.2 12 Jan 95 0146 62 52.7 S 144 51.1 E 258.8 511.1 12 Jan 95 0157 62 52.7 S 144 51.1 E 257.2 512.4 12 Jan 95 0213 62 52.7 S 144 51.1 E 257.9 510.7 12 Jan 95 0227 62 52.7 S 144 51.1 E 256.4 511.8 14 Jan 95 0751 63 26.0 S 156 39.0 E 259.8 511.5 14 Jan 95 0803 63 26.0 S 156 39.0 E 259.2 510.3 20 Jan 95 0938 65 04.9 S 139 51.5 E 261.5 508.7 20 Jan 95 0952 65 04.9 S 139 51.5 E 260.1 507.6 20 Jan 95 1008 65 04.9 S 139 51.5 E 260.1 506.7 20 Jan 95 1021 65 04.9 S 139 51.5 E 260.8 -9.0 20 Jan 95 1035 65 04.9 S 139 51.5 E 260.5 507.2 22 Jan 95 1424 60 36.0 S 139 51.0 E 259.0 507.1 22 Jan 95 1435 60 36.0 S 139 51.0 E 258.8 510.4 22 Jan 95 1449 60 36.0 S 139 51.0 E 259.3 508.4 27 Jan 95 1107 51 35.9 S 143 03.1 E 255.6 -9.0 27 Jan 95 1118 51 35.9 S 143 03.1 E 257.8 501.9 27 Jan 95 1130 51 35.9 S 143 03.1 E 256.2 499.6 27 Jan 95 1145 51 35.9 S 143 03.1 E 258.0 497.5 27 Jan 95 1157 51 35.9 S 143 03.1 E 259.0 497.4 1 Feb 95 0353 44 07.0 S 146 13.0 E 256.9 502.0 1 Feb 95 0404 44 07.0 S 146 13.0 E 257.4 500.5 1 Feb 95 0416 44 07.0 S 146 13.0 E 257.3 498.8 1 Feb 95 0427 44 07.0 S 146 13.0 E 256.2 496.9 Table 4: AU9404 CFC Air values (interpolated to station locations) Stn F11 F12 # Latitude Longitude Date PPT PPT --- --------- ---------- --------- ----- ----- 1 57 32.1 S 127 49.5 E 20 Dec 94 257.5 510.2 2 61 59.1 S 120 01.7 E 21 Dec 94 257.6 510.2 3 62 00.7 S 119 02.1 E 21 Dec 94 257.6 510.2 4 62 00.3 S 118 01.6 E 22 Dec 94 257.6 510.2 6 65 59.3 S 109 55.0 E 2 Jan 95 258.3 506.6 7 65 23.1 S 112 33.2 E 3 Jan 95 258.3 506.6 8 65 18.5 S 112 32.2 E 3 Jan 95 258.3 506.6 9 64 57.7 S 112 09.6 E 4 Jan 95 258.3 506.6 10 64 44.9 S 111 55.1 E 4 Jan 95 258.3 506.6 11 64 30.9 S 111 25.8 E 4 Jan 95 258.3 506.6 12 64 06.1 S 112 05.9 E 4 Jan 95 258.3 506.6 13 63 40.8 S 112 36.5 E 4 Jan 95 258.3 506.6 14 63 16.5 S 113 13.0 E 5 Jan 95 258.3 506.6 15 62 50.8 S 113 49.1 E 5 Jan 95 258.3 506.6 16 62 25.3 S 114 25.7 E 5 Jan 95 258.3 506.6 17 62 00.0 S 115 01.0 E 6 Jan 95 258.0 510.1 18 61 59.7 S 116 30.5 E 6 Jan 95 258.0 510.1 19 62 00.3 S 120 01.4 E 6 Jan 95 258.0 510.1 20 61 59.8 S 121 26.9 E 7 Jan 95 258.0 510.1 21 62 00.2 S 122 50.4 E 7 Jan 95 258.0 510.1 22 62 00.1 S 124 15.4 E 7 Jan 95 258.0 510.1 23 62 00.2 S 125 39.6 E 7 Jan 95 258.0 510.1 24 62 00.4 S 127 05.5 E 8 Jan 95 258.4 509.9 25 62 00.7 S 128 31.6 E 8 Jan 95 258.4 509.9 26 62 00.2 S 129 56.7 E 8 Jan 95 258.4 509.9 27 62 00.6 S 131 20.0 E 9 Jan 95 258.4 509.9 28 61 59.9 S 132 45.6 E 9 Jan 95 258.4 509.9 29 62 01.4 S 134 11.1 E 9 Jan 95 258.4 509.9 30 62 00.3 S 135 35.1 E 9 Jan 95 258.7 510.9 31 61 59.9 S 137 01.3 E 10 Jan 95 258.7 510.9 32 62 09.5 S 138 27.2 E 10 Jan 95 258.7 510.9 33 62 21.5 S 139 53.4 E 10 Jan 95 258.7 510.9 34 62 28.1 S 141 03.3 E 11 Jan 95 258.7 510.9 35 62 35.9 S 142 12.4 E 11 Jan 95 258.7 510.9 36 62 45.8 S 143 36.2 E 11 Jan 95 258.7 510.9 37 62 54.2 S 145 03.3 E 12 Jan 95 258.7 510.9 38 63 03.1 S 146 28.0 E 12 Jan 95 258.7 510.9 39 63 10.7 S 147 50.9 E 12 Jan 95 258.7 510.9 40 63 18.6 S 149 12.6 E 13 Jan 95 258.2 511.3 41 63 25.9 S 150 39.8 E 13 Jan 95 258.2 511.3 42 63 25.6 S 152 10.8 E 13 Jan 95 258.2 511.3 43 63 26.2 S 153 41.4 E 13 Jan 95 258.2 511.3 44 63 26.1 S 155 10.9 E 14 Jan 95 258.2 511.3 45 63 25.8 S 156 39.1 E 14 Jan 95 258.2 511.3 46 63 26.0 S 158 09.9 E 14 Jan 95 258.2 511.3 47 63 25.6 S 159 26.4 E 14 Jan 95 258.2 511.3 48 64 00.9 S 160 10.7 E 15 Jan 95 258.2 511.3 49 64 37.3 S 160 44.3 E 15 Jan 95 258.2 511.3 50 65 18.0 S 161 23.8 E 15 Jan 95 258.2 511.3 51 65 56.0 S 162 03.3 E 16 Jan 95 258.2 511.3 52 66 06.7 S 162 14.2 E 16 Jan 95 258.2 511.3 53 66 09.1 S 162 15.3 E 16 Jan 95 258.2 511.3 54 64 13.9 S 155 19.7 E 18 Jan 95 258.2 511.3 55 66 36.3 S 144 09.6 E 19 Jan 95 259.3 509.5 56 66 00.5 S 142 39.2 E 19 Jan 95 259.3 509.5 57 65 50.6 S 141 25.6 E 19 Jan 95 259.3 509.5 58 65 35.1 S 139 50.4 E 19 Jan 95 259.3 509.5 59 65 32.5 S 139 51.1 E 20 Jan 95 260.0 508.0 60 65 26.3 S 139 50.7 E 20 Jan 95 260.0 508.0 61 65 04.8 S 139 51.6 E 20 Jan 95 260.0 508.0 62 64 49.4 S 139 49.4 E 20 Jan 95 260.0 508.0 63 64 17.2 S 139 51.3 E 20 Jan 95 260.0 508.0 64 63 51.6 S 139 52.2 E 21 Jan 95 260.0 508.0 65 63 21.7 S 139 50.5 E 21 Jan 95 260.0 508.0 66 62 50.8 S 139 51.1 E 21 Jan 95 260.0 508.0 67 62 20.4 S 139 49.7 E 21 Jan 95 260.0 508.0 68 61 51.1 S 139 51.2 E 22 Jan 95 260.0 508.0 69 61 21.9 S 139 53.3 E 22 Jan 95 260.0 508.0 70 60 36.2 S 139 49.9 E 22 Jan 95 260.0 508.0 71 59 50.9 S 139 51.8 E 22 Jan 95 260.0 508.0 72 59 05.7 S 139 51.6 E 23 Jan 95 260.0 508.0 73 58 21.1 S 139 51.7 E 23 Jan 95 259.0 504.8 74 57 38.8 S 139 52.7 E 23 Jan 95 258.0 503.2 75 56 56.1 S 139 49.7 E 24 Jan 95 258.0 503.2 76 56 12.0 S 140 17.5 E 24 Jan 95 258.0 503.2 77 55 30.1 S 140 44.3 E 24 Jan 95 258.0 503.2 78 55 00.5 S 141 00.9 E 25 Jan 95 258.0 503.2 79 54 31.3 S 141 19.1 E 25 Jan 95 258.0 503.2 80 54 03.3 S 141 36.0 E 25 Jan 95 258.0 503.2 81 53 35.0 S 141 53.1 E 25 Jan 95 258.0 503.2 82 53 07.5 S 142 08.5 E 26 Jan 95 258.0 503.2 83 52 40.3 S 142 24.4 E 26 Jan 95 257.6 501.9 84 52 15.8 S 142 38.7 E 26 Jan 95 257.6 501.9 85 51 51.4 S 142 51.8 E 26 Jan 95 257.6 501.9 86 51 25.9 S 143 03.7 E 27 Jan 95 257.1 499.3 87 50 33.1 S 142 43.1 E 27 Jan 95 257.1 499.3 88 51 02.6 S 143 13.9 E 28 Jan 95 257.1 499.3 89 50 43.2 S 143 24.4 E 28 Jan 95 257.1 499.3 90 50 25.2 S 143 33.0 E 28 Jan 95 257.1 499.3 91 50 04.8 S 143 44.9 E 28 Jan 95 257.1 499.3 92 49 43.1 S 143 54.1 E 29 Jan 95 257.1 499.3 93 49 15.5 S 144 07.8 E 29 Jan 95 257.1 499.3 94 48 46.6 S 144 19.2 E 29 Jan 95 257.1 499.3 95 48 18.4 S 144 31.9 E 30 Jan 95 257.1 499.3 96 47 47.9 S 144 46.1 E 30 Jan 95 257.1 499.3 97 47 27.2 S 144 53.7 E 30 Jan 95 257.1 499.3 98 47 09.0 S 145 03.1 E 30 Jan 95 257.1 499.3 99 46 38.2 S 145 15.4 E 31 Jan 95 257.1 499.3 100 46 09.2 S 145 27.9 E 31 Jan 95 257.1 499.3 101 45 41.6 S 145 40.4 E 31 Jan 95 257.1 499.3 102 45 13.4 S 145 50.4 E 31 Jan 95 257.1 499.3 103 44 42.6 S 146 01.9 E 31 Jan 95 257.1 499.3 104 44 23.0 S 146 11.0 E 1 Feb 95 257.1 499.3 105 44 07.2 S 146 13.2 E 1 Feb 95 257.1 499.3 106 43 59.9 S 146 18.9 E 1 Feb 95 257.1 499.3 107 44 11.7 S 146 55.0 E 1 Feb 95 257.1 499.3 DATA QUALITY EVALUATIONS DQ EVALUATION OF WOCE P12/S04I/PR12/SR03 (Arnold Mantyla) 10 Feb. 1999 Two WOCE sections were completed on this cruise. The first, labeled S04 in the .sum file, completed the gap in the circumpolar line of stations between S04P and S04I, mostly in the Australian- Antarctic Basin. The second line, listed as SR03 in the .sum file, provided another season crossing of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current system between the Adelie Coast and Tasmania. This is a very useful data set, and should help elucidate the fate of abyssal waters originating from the Adelie coast and the Ross Sea. The data were taken with a 24 place rosette system, and even though the deep water coverage was reasonably good, the WOCE standard 36 place rosette would have been better for improving shallow and intermediate depth coverage and to place extra samples near deep-water inversions often seen near Antarctica. The quality of salinity and oxygen data were first rate and should have been listed to one more decimal place to meet WOCE requirements. An excessive number of CTD and bottle salinities were flagged as "bad" data, even in cases where the two were in perfect agreement. The majority of my QUALT2 changes were in restoring those cases to acceptable data codes. I am reluctant to throw out useful data, knowing how poor subsequent fill-in inter- polations can be when the data are put to use. Most of the seemingly poor quality salinities were in the strong halocline just below the surface mixed layer. In these strong gradient regions, a statistical time average will naturally have a high standard deviation, but the resulting mean is a valid estimate of the local salinity, and should be accepted as such, especially when confirmed by the water sample salinity. The few oxygen uncertainties were most likely due to sample drawing errors (2 from one niskin, none from another). One station, 78 appears to be systematically high by about 6%; the standard factor calculation should be verified to see if the data can be corrected. The nutrient data had the most uncertainty, although that isn't reflected in the quality flags. Either the PO4 or the NO3 profiles would often shift independently of the other for groups of stations, unlike the consistent nitrate/phosphate slopes and intercepts seen on other expeditions. Although I could tell where shifts occurred, I could not at this time tell which data set was likely to be correct or doubtful. Perhaps a careful evaluation of the standards and blanks used to calculate the data might result in improved consistency in the N/P ratio. Comparisons with other cruises were inconclusive, showing no clear overall bias for the data in this cruise, although differences between specific cruise crossings or overlaps did occur. The first 34 stations had the number 12 and 24 phosphates flagged as poor because these samples followed a wash cycle and were suppressed by a few percent. Later stations ran double samples to eliminate the problem. Lou Gordon in his WOCE nutrient guide describes a technique for correcting for this source of error; I would encourage the data originators to try the method to see if most of the lost phosphates could be recovered. The following are comments on specific stations with problems that should be looked into: Sta. 62: The phosphates and nitrates are coded "4" for bad data, but the silicates are coded "7", which I thought was reserved for gas chromatograph data. Does this mean the silicates are bad (and should be coded 4) also? Sta. 78: All of the oxygens are systematically higher by about 6% than the bracketing stations. I suspect that an error has occurred in the standard factor and the data should be corrected. If not, list all of the O2's for this station as uncertain. Sta. 80, 1300db: All of the water samples are questionable at this depth, but would be ok at the usually sampled depth of 1200db. Could this be a depth mistake (with incorrect CTD data as well)? Sta. 96, 1600db: The water samples, bad at this depth, appear to be from about 1400db unsampled depth. Could this be a depth error also? Sta. 97, 1800 and 2000db: These water samples appear to be from the data gap between 1200 and 1800db. Were there attempts to trip bottles at abut 1400 and 1600db where these samples appear to belong? If so, it would be worth salvaging the data. Sta. 103, 110-502db: The nitrates appear to be tabulated one depth too deep, there are no other water samples listed at 502db. If so, the NO3's would be ok at one depth shallower. Sta. 103, 66-200db: According to the CTD, the bottle salinities listed at 66 and 111db are actually from 111 and 200db. This is not a mis-trip, per the oxygen data, so it must be a sample drawing error. Since the CTD confirm the correct location for these samples, why not list them as ok at their correct depths? PI RESPONSE TO BOTTLE DATA QUALITY EVALUATION (Mark Rosenberg) 1999.DEC.10 Answer as per the order of the DQE report: 1. "An excessive number of CTD and bottle salinities were flagged as bad..." In my own version of the data (i.e. before converting it to WOCE format), flags for the CTD burst data in the bottle file (used for comparison with bottles) are automatically downgraded when the CTD burst data exceeds a certain standard deviation (I'm typically not too concerned as plenty of good CTD salinity values remain for the conductivity calibration). I've then automatically carried these flags through to the WOCE format files without giving due thought to upgrading flags. I agree with you though, if the CTD and bottle values agree then may as well resurrect the CTD values with a good flag, so there isn't so many gaps in the strong gradients. I'd be reluctant to resurrect them if there isn't a good bottle value for them to agree with, or if they don't agree - a flag "3" might be a compromise in such cases, so that at least there's a clear distinction between these values and values where there's no problem at all (i.e. no strong gradient, or no rolling ship). For bottle salinities, I could only spot 3 values that might be worth resurrecting: station bottle difference between CTD and bottle ------- ------ --------------------------------- 45 21 .004 47 13 .004 77 18 .002 2. "The first 34 stations had the number 12 and 24 phosphates flagged as poor because... ...WOCE nutrient guide describes a technique for correcting..." I always get confused between the countless errors and possible corrections in the nutrient analyses, particularly as I'm not a chemist, but it's possible there's 2 different errors here: (a) the carrryover error referred to in the WOCE nutrient manual i.e. from the "more or less incomplete flushing of the flow system between samples" (b) the suppression of phosphate peaks run after a wash cycle, described in our data report for cruise 09AR9407 as : "...suppressed by, on average, 2%. It is suspected that this was due to sorption of the phosphomolybdate complex produced by the presence of phosphate in the sample onto the walls of the instrument tubing, after having been exposed to the cleaning action of the low nutrient seawater wash." Our bottle 12 and 24 samples are due to error (b), and as this seems to me to be different to error (a), I wouldn't be game to apply the WOCE guide correction to the relevant phosphates. Guess I'm more comfortable to accept the loss of data. On a happy note, a couple of years after this cruise our nutrient guy successfully "fixed" the problem, or at least made it no longer significant, just in time for our last WOCE cruise. 3. "Sta. 62: ...phosphates and nitrates are coded "4"...silicates coded "7"..." The silicates for bottles 1 to 23 are okay, but the peaks were measured manually from the strip charts rather than by automatic peak integration in the software. I used the 7 flag to reflect this, not noticing that it was already reserved for gas chromatograph data (oops). Probably okay to change these flags to "2". 4. "Sta. 78: ...oxygens...higher by about 6%..." There's no hope of correcting it unfortunately: I'd prefer flag "4". I've also flagged the CTD oxygen as bad in the *.ctd file for this station. 5. "Sta. 80 1300db..." 6. "sta. 96, 1600 db..." 7. "sta. 97, 1800 and 2000 db..." Misfire problems at all 3 of these stations. As it happens the CTD 2 dbar averaged data for all these stations is upcast, making it easy to compare CTD salinity in the .ctd files to bottle salinities to confirm where the bottle samples come from. You're right in all 3 cases, and I've put in the correct CTD values and changed the flags for the bottle values. 8. "Sta. 103, 110-502db: nitrates..." Post-processing of the nitrate autoanalyser results for this station got rather messy, so despite the apparently better appearance moving the samples one depth up, I still can't help feeling it's a bit of a "fudge" - I'd feel better leaving them where they are and flagged as bad. 9. "Sta. 103, 66-200db: ...bottle salinities..." The salinity bottle at 66 dbar is still fairly scattered from the CTD value at 111dbar, though the bottle at 111dbar matches the 200dbar CTD value. But the salinity bottle at 200 dbar doesn't seem to match anything. So I'm not sure it's conclusive that the 66 and 111 dbar bottles come from 1 depth down, but I'm happy to move them down and flag them as "3". Rosenberg, continued 1999.DEC.12 I've done the flag changes for cruise AR9404 bottle data file, plus I've added in parameters 7,8 (CFC's) for the appropriate stations in the sum file. Also changed CTD oxygen flags to 4 in a94045078.ctd. stn 62 …bottle 1-23 changed QUALT1 from 7 to 3 for silicate …changed QUALT2 from 7 to 3 for silicate stn 78 …bottle 1-24 changed QUALT1 from 2 to 4 for CTD and bottle oxygen …changed QUALT2 from 2 to 3 for CTD oxygen stn 80 …bottle 9 changed all CTD values for the new pressure …changed QUALT1 to 2 for bottle sal,ox,nuts …changed QUALT2 to 2 for bottle sal,ox,nuts stn 96 …bottle 10 changed all CTD values for the new pressure bottle oxygen …changed by .1 due to new density in conversion to umol/kg …changed QUALT1 to 2 for bottle sal,ox,nuts …changed QUALT2 to 2 for bottle sal,ox,nuts stn 97 …bottle 111,10 changed all CTD values for the new pressure …changed QUALT1 to 2 for bottle sal,ox,nuts …changed QUALT2 to 2 for bottle sal,ox,nuts stn 103 …bottle 222,21,20 moved bottle salinity for 222 and 21 down one depth, and made bottle salinity for 222 equal to -9.0000 …changed QUALT1 for bottle salinity to, respectively, 5,3,3 for the 3 bottles …changed QUALT2 to 5 for bottle 222 bottle sal CTD salinity in steep gradients for most stations - I didn't resurrect any QUALT1 flags as it looks like you got it covered in the QUALT2 flags. So the QUALT1 cautions will reflect the high standard deviations. CTD CONTENTS AND CONSISTENCY CHECK (S03/S04I 09AR9404_1) (WHPO Staff) 2002.JAN.03 The WHP-Exchange format bottle and/or CTD data from this cruise have been examined by a computer application for contents and consistency. … The parameters found for the files are listed, … a check is made to see if all CTD files for this cruise contain the same CTD parameters, … a check is made to see if there is a one-to-one correspondence between bottle station numbers and CTD station numbers, … a check is made to see that pressures increase through each file for each station, … and a check is made to locate multiple casts for the same station number in the bottle data. Results of those checks are reported in this '_check.txt' file. When both bottle and CTD data are available, the CTD salinity data (and, if available, CTD oxygen data) reported in the bottle data file are subtracted from the corresponding bottle data and the differences are plotted for the entire cruise. Those plots are the' _sal.ps' (figure 1) and '_oxy.ps' (figure 2) files. Following parameters found for bottle file: EXPOCODE DEPTH SILCAT SECT_ID CTDPRS SILCAT_FLAG_W STNNBR CTDTMP NO2+NO3 CASTNO CTDSAL NO2+NO3_FLAG_W SAMPNO CTDSAL_FLAG_W PHSPHT BTLNBR SALNTY PHSPHT_FLAG_W BTLNBR_FLAG_W SALNTY_FLAG_W CFC-11 DATE CTDOXY CFC-11_FLAG_W TIME CTDOXY_FLAG_W CFC-12 LATITUDE OXYGEN CFC-12_FLAG_W LONGITUDE OXYGEN_FLAG_W s04_sr03_hy1.csv -> NO2+NO3_FLAG_W found without matching parameter. * All ctd parameters match the parameters in the reference station. * Station #5 has a CTD file, but does not exist in s04_sr03_hy1.csv. * No bottle pressure inversions found. * Bottle file pressures are increasing. * No multiple casts found in bottle data. FINAL REPORT FOR AMS 14C SAMPLES (Robert M. Key) April 19, 1999 1.0 General Information WOCE cruise S04I was carried out aboard the R/V N.B. Palmer in the southern Indian Ocean. The WHPO designation for this cruise was 320696/3. Thomas Whitworth III (TAMU) and James H. Swift (SIO) were the co-chief scientists. The cruise constituted the Indian Ocean portion of WOCE line S4, a meridional circumnavigation of Antarctica at a nominal latitude of 60S. This segment covered the longitudes 20°E to 120°E. A total of 108 full depth CTD/Rosette stations were carried out. The cruise departed Cape Town, South Africa on May 3 and ended at Hobart Tasmania on July 4, 1996. On June 8, science operations were suspended for seven days when the Palmer was diverted to Mirnyy Station in the Davis Sea to deliver emergency food supplies. The reader is referred to cruise documentation provided by the chief scientists as the primary source for cruise information. This report covers details of the small volume radiocarbon samples. The AMS station locations are shown in Figure 1 and summarized in Table 1. A total of 816 delta 14C samples were collected at 31 stations. TABLE 1. S04I delta 14C station locations. Bottom Stn Month Latitude Longitude Depth (m) --- ------- ------- --------- --------- 1 5/16/96 -58.008 20.006 5412 7 5/18/96 -61.399 25.749 5243 13 5/20/96 -64.000 30.017 5135 23 5/22/96 -65.134 37.349 4874 26 5/24/96 -64.465 41.619 4435 29 5/25/96 -63.736 46.408 4270 35 5/28/96 -65.456 53.363 501 36 5/28/96 -65.371 53.264 1303 38 5/28/96 -65.104 53.018 2468 40 5/29/96 -64.435 53.072 4200 42 5/29/96 -63.498 53.682 4790 46 5/30/96 -63.501 58.335 4566 51 6/01/96 -62.361 64.406 4365 55 6/03/96 -61.962 70.017 4165 58 6/04/96 -61.806 74.982 4000 62 6/05/96 -61.417 80.489 2480 66 6/06/96 -59.696 84.850 2024 68 6/07/96 -59.660 85.248 4494 70 6/07/96 -59.520 86.221 4304 73 6/14/96 -65.330 91.475 553 76 6/15/96 -64.859 93.004 1808 78 6/16/96 -64.464 92.481 3060 80 6/16/96 -63.653 91.737 3629 84 6/18/96 -63.092 86.007 3809 87 6/20/96 -62.001 90.001 4020 90 6/22/96 -62.286 94.670 3848 93 6/23/96 -62.335 99.558 4316 98 6/24/96 -62.104 105.26 4297 102 6/26/96 -62.244 110.60 3986 105 6/26/96 -62.002 115.33 4255 108 6/27/96 -62.000 120.00 4194 2.0 Personnel 14C sampling for this cruise was carried out by Robert M. Key (Princeton University). 14C (and accompanying 13C) analyses were performed at the National Ocean Sciences AMS Facility (NOSAMS) at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. R. Key collected the data from the originators, merged the files, assigned quality control flags to the 14C and submitted the data files to the WOCE office (4/99). R. Key is P.I. for the 14C data and NOSAMS for the 13C data. 3.0 Results This 14C data set and any changes or additions supersedes any prior release. 3.1 Hydrography Hydrography from this leg has been submitted to the WOCE office by the chief scientist and described in the hydrographic report. 3.2 14C The delta 14C values reported here were originally distributed in a NOSAMS data report (NOSAMS, 1999), February 16, 1999. That reports included results which had not been through the WOCE quality control procedures. This report supersedes that data distribution. All of the AMS samples from this cruise have been measured. Replicate measurements were made on 4 water samples. These replicate analyses are tabulated in Table 2. The table shows the error weighted mean and uncertainty Table 2: Summary of Replicate Analyses Sta-Cast- delta E.W. Bottle 14C Err Mean(a) Uncertainty(b) -------- ----- --- ------- -------------- 51-1-9 -161.31 2.92 -167.40 2.62 -176.84 2.91 51-1-10 -167.33 3.26 -167.40 2.59 -167.51 4.29 58-1-26 -151.72 5.74 -155.78 3.49 -156.65 2.67 70-1-5 -176.29 4.42 -176.06 3.46 -175.69 5.55 ----------------------------------------------- (a) Error weighted mean reported with data set (b) Larger of the standard deviation and the error weighted standard deviation of the mean. for each set of replicates. Uncertainty is defined here as the larger of the standard deviation and the error weighted standard deviation of the mean. For these replicates, the simple average of the normal standard deviations for the replicates is 1.0o/oo. This precision estimate is lower than the average error for the time frame over which these samples were measured (Jul. 1996 - Dec. 1998) and lower than the overall mean error for Pacific WOCE samples (Elder, et. al., 1998). Note that the errors given for individual measurements in the final data report (with the exception of the replicates) include only counting errors, and errors due to blanks and backgrounds. The uncertainty obtained for replicate analyses is generally a better estimate of the true error since it includes errors due to sample collection, sample degassing, etc. Close examination of the data along 67°S in the deep water indicates that 4” is a more realistic of the true error associated with this data set. 4.0 Quality Control Flag Assignment Quality flag values were assigned to all delta 14C measurements using the code defined in Table 0.2 of WHP Office Report WHPO 91-1 Rev. 2 section 4.5.2. (Joyce, et al., 1994). Measurement flags values of 2, 3, and 6 have been assigned. The choice between values 2 (good) and 3 (questionable) involves some interpretation. There is little overlap between this data set and any existing 14C data, so that type of comparison was difficult. In general the lack of other data for comparison led to a more lenient grading on the 14C data. When using this data set for scientific application, any 14C datum which is flagged with a "3" should be carefully considered. When flagging 14C data, the measurement error was taken into consideration. That is, approximately one-third of the 14C measurements are expected to deviate from the true value by more than the measurement precision. No measured values have been removed from this data set. Table 3 summarizes the quality control flags assigned to this data set. For a detailed description of the flagging procedure see Key, et al. (1996). 5.0 Data Summary Figures 2-6 summarize the delta 14C data collected on this leg. Only delta 14C measurements with a quality flag value of 2 ("good") or 6 ("replicate") are included in each figure. Figure 2 shows the delta 14C values with 2sigma error bars plotted as a function of pressure. The mid depth delta 14C minimum which normally occurs around 2500 meters in most of the Pacific is absent in this section. In fact, there is very little variation in the deep and bottom water. All of the samples for the entire cruise collected at a depth greater than 1000 meters have a mean delta 14C = -153.8±7.2o/oo with a substantial fraction of this variance due to the samples collected very near the Antarctic slope. This result compares remarkably well with the mean of -156.0±8.5o/oo calculated for the WOCE Pacific Antarctic section (S4P). Figure 3 shows the delta 14C values plotted against silicate.The straight line shown in the figure is the least squares regression relationship derived by Broecker et al. (1995) based on the GEOSECS global data set. According to their analysis, this line (delta 14C = -70 - Si) represents the relationship between naturally occurring radiocarbon and silicate for most of the ocean. They interpret deviations in delta 14C above this line to be due to input of bomb-produced radiocarbon, however, they note that the technique can not be applied at high latitudes as confirmed by this data set. With the exception of the very near surface waters, this region of the Pacific shows no change since GEOSECS which strongly implies that the data in Figure 3 indicates a failure of the technique in this area rather than bomb- produced contamination throughout the water column. Table 3: Summary of Assigned Quality Control Flags Flag Number 2 803 3 6 4 0 5 4 6 3(a) ------------ (a) Some replicates flagged 3 or 4 Figure 4 shows all of the S04I radiocarbon values plotted against potential alkalinity normalized to a salinity of 35 (defined as [alkalinity + nitrate]*35/salinity). The straight line is the regression fit (14C = -68 - (PALK_35 - 2320) derived by S. Rubin (LDEO) to all of the GEOSECS results for waters which were assumed to have no bomb produced delta 14C (depths greater than 1000 meters, but including high latitude samples). Preliminary investigation indicates that this new method for separating bomb-produced and natural 14C works in high latitude waters. For this data set it appears that the regression intercept derived from the GEOSECS data may be a bit too low. Regardless, if the function is valid, then for these data, waters which have alkalinity values less than ~2400 µmol/kg have a significant amount of bomb- produced radiocarbon. If this is true, and if the values have changed little since GEOSECS, then most of the bomb contamination had to have been distributed throughout most of the water column even as early as the mid 1970's. Figures 5-7 show gridded sections of the delta 14C data. The data were gridded using the "loess" methods described in Chambers et al. (1983), Chambers and Hastie (1991), Cleveland (1979) and Cleveland and Devlin (1988). Figure 5 shows the main zonal cruise section along ~62°S. The colors in the image indicate delta 14C while the contours are CFC-11 concentration (pmol/kg; preliminary data from Bill Smethie (LDEO) and Mark Warner (UW)). Significant resolution is lost in the deep water delta 14C since most of the variability is near the surface. Nevertheless, a strong correlation in the two distributions is immediately apparent. The bottom waters both east and west of the Kerguelen Ridge (~80°E) have appreciable chlorofluorocarbon concentrations and are most likely contaminated with bomb-produced radiocarbon. The highest near bottom (pressure >3750dB) delta 14C values along this section range between -140o/oo and -130o/oo and are comparable to near bottom waters at similar latitudes in the Pacific (Key and Schlosser, 1999). Figure 6 and Figure 7 show contoured sections of the delta 14C distribution along 65°E and 90°E respectively. Note that the contour interval used in the two figures is different. The 65°E and 90°E sections clearly show penetration of bomb radiocarbon along the Antarctic continental slope. 6.0 References and Supporting Documentation Broecker, W.S., S. Sutherland and W. Smethie, Oceanic radiocarbon: Separation of the natural and bomb components, Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 9(2), 263- 288, 1995. Chambers, J.M. and Hastie, T.J., 1991, Statistical Models in S, Wadsworth & Brooks, Cole Computer Science Series, Pacific Grove, CA, 608pp. Chambers, J.M., Cleveland, W.S., Kleiner, B., and Tukey, P.A., 1983, Graphical Methods for Data Analysis, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA. Cleveland, W.S., 1979, Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots, J. Amer. Statistical Assoc., 74, 829-836. Cleveland, W.S. and S.J. Devlin, 1988, Locally-weighted regression: An approach to regression analysis by local fitting, J. Am. Statist. Assoc, 83:596-610. Elder, K.L. A.P. McNichol and A.R. Gagnon, Reproducibility of seawater, inorganic and organic carbon 14C results at NOSAMS, Radiocarbon, 40(1), 223- 230, 1998 Joyce, T., and Corry, C., eds., Corry, C., Dessier, A., Dickson, A., Joyce, T., Kenny, M., Key, R., Legler, D., Millard, R., Onken, R., Saunders, P., Stalcup, M., contrib., Requirements for WOCE Hydrographic Programme Data Reporting, WHPO Pub. 90-1 Rev. 2, 145pp., 1994. Key, R.M., WOCE Pacific Ocean radiocarbon program, Radiocarbon, 38(3), 415-423, 1996. Key, R.M., P.D. Quay, G.A. Jones, A.P. McNichol, K.F. Von Reden and R.J. Schneider, WOCE AMS Radiocarbon I: Pacific Ocean results; P6, P16 & P17, Radiocarbon, 38(3), 425-518, 1996. Key, R.M. and P. Schlosser, S4P: Final report for AMS 14C samples, Ocean Tracer Lab Technical Report 99-1, January, 1999, 11pp. NOSAMS, National Ocean Sciences AMS Facility Data Report #99-043, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, 02543, 2/16/1999. Figure Legends: Figure 1: AMS 14C station map for WOCE S04I. Figure 2: delta 14C results for S04I stations shown with 2s error bars.Only those measurements having a quality control flag value of 2 or 6 are plotted. Figure 3: delta 14C as a function of silicate for S04I AMS samples. The straight line shows the relationship proposed by Broecker, et al., 1995 (delta 14C = -70 - Si with radiocarbon in o/oo and silicate in µmol/kg). Two- sigma error bars are given for the delta 14C measurements. Figure 4: Based on the new method devised by S. Rubin, the samples which plot above the line and have potential alkalinity values less than about 2400 µmol/kg are contaminated with bomb-produced 14C. Figure 5: delta 14C concentrations, along main east-west section of S04I at approximately 62°S, are indicated by color. Contour lines are preliminary CFC-11 concentrations (pmol/kg). Figure 6: delta 14C along ~65°E near the Antarctic slope. The near bottom values along the lower slope indicate entrainment of "new" bottom water. Figure 7: delta 14C along ~90°E near the Antarctic slope. The near bottom values along the lower slope indicate entrainment of "new" bottom water. DATA PROCESSING NOTES Date Contact Data Type Data Status -------- ----------- -------------- --------------------------------------- 04/25/98 Rosenberg DOC CFC Rpt/Cruise Rpt Rcvd @ WHPO 09/11/98 Diggs CTD/BTL/SUM Data Updated and corrected 09/16/98 Rintoul CTD/BTL/SUM Submitted for DQE "I have just corrected and updated all records pertaining to P12/S04I. This line is also know as SR03 and PR12, the *correct* expocode is 09AR9404_1 (not 09AR9508/1), but all references to the previous expocode should be retained in our records. The data files to date are NON-PUBLIC and the password is the same as P12." 01/04/99 Anderson BTL/CTD Ready to Reformat 02/07/99 Mantyla NUTs/S/O DQE Begun 02/10/99 Anderson SUM/BTL Data Reformatted "I have reformatted P12 (S04, SR03, PR12). Arnold is DQEing that line now. I have reformatted P14N. George will DQE that line next. The .sea, .sum, and readme files for these cruises are on whpo in /usr/export/ftp/pub/WHPO/S_ANDERSON/P12 or P14N." 02/10/99 Mantyla NUTs/S/O DQE Report rcvd @ WHPO 09/14/99 Rosenberg NO2+NO3 no separate nitrite data "For P11A (09AR9391_2), there's no separate nitrite data, only total nitrate+nitrite. In fact the same applies to all our Aurora Australis WOCE cruises." 09/20/99 Rintoul CTD Data are Public "All the CTD data associated with me should be made public. I thought we had taken care of this earlier, but it appears not. I'm a little unsure how the DQE process is supposed to work. I think only two of our cruises have so far been DQE'd; if your policy is to not release data publicly until it has been DQE'd, then that is OK too." 12/10/99 Rosenberg BTL First PI Response to DQE Report 12/17/99 Rosenberg BTL Changes made by PI following DQE 12/23/99 Rosenberg CFCs/NUTs/TSO Data are Public "Submitted new CFC data file. ""You can also make all the data for that cruise public.""" 03/24/00 Schlosser He/Tr Data are Public "as mentioned in my recent message, we will release our data with a flag that indicates that they are not yet final. We started the process of transferring the data and we will continue with the transfer during the next weeks. I had listed the expected order of delivery in my last message." 04/26/00 Bartolacci Cruise ID p12 designation changed to s03 "After DPC meeting April, 2000 it was decided to delete P12 from Pacific table and move data to S03. this was done and S03 was added to the southern onetime lines." 09/06/00 Uribe BTL/SUM Data Update There is a version online of S. Anderson's revised data. However Mark Rosenberg submitted more recent files that contain Quality 2 data." 12/04/00 Tilbrook ALKALI/TCARBN Submitted "A comma separated file is attached that contains the DIC and alkalinity data for the SR3 line and the part of the S4 line we did from about 120E to meet the S4P line near the Ross Sea (CTD2 - 57). The SR3 line starts about CTD 58. Missing data is represented by -9, the nitrite column shows all ""-9"". The quality control flags conform to the WOCE standard, but are in individual columns. This file was used by the US carbon group in their crossover analysis for the Pacific. According to Chris Sabine (who put the quality control flags in WOCE standards format), our data are in good shape. As far as I am aware there are no corrections applied to our DIC or alkalinity data. By the way, Chris sent me a file where he had combined the carbon and CFC data from John Bullister and Mark Warner. I guess Mark and John are giving you their data and if so, I can send the file with the CFC data in it. I will try and get the P11S carbon data to you in the next few weeks. For now, please do not make these data public access." 12/05/00 Diggs ALKALI/TCARBN Reformatting Needed; given to S. Anderson "I have received the Carbon data for S04-SR03 (09AR9404_1) from Bronte Tilbrook (CSIRO) via Lynne Talley yesterday. Although the data are not in the WOCE format, there's enough information in them to make a WOCE-style bottle file which will enable us to merge these data into the existing bottle file." 12/05/00 Diggs DOC Website Updated New DOC online "I have updated the very outdated DOC file with updated MS Word docs that were just sitting around. Now, the docs look better and I've added J. Bullister's 1997 CFC docs to the new PDF file online." 06/21/01 Uribe BTL Website Updated; CSV File Added Bottle file in exchange format was put online. 10/15/01 Diggs CTD Data Reformatted CTD had duplicate files in the ZIP archive and I have removed the extra files. Re-zipped the remainder and replaced the online zip CTD archive file. 12/24/01 Uribe CTD Website Updated; CSV File Added CTD has been converted to exchange using the new code and put online. Empty section ID's were filled in with AUR from R/V AURORA AUSTRALIS. 01/03/02 Hajrasuliha CTD Internal DQE completed made .ps files. & *check.txt file. 01/31/02 Kozyr ALKALI/TCARBN Final data rec'd @WHPO "I have put 3 data files in WHPO ftp INCOMING area. These files are the final CO2-related data and quality flags for WOCE sections A14 (L'ATALANTE 35A3CITHER3/1), A13 (L'ATALANTE 35A3CITHER3/2), and SR03/S04 (P12, 09AR9404_1)." 05/14/02 Anderson ALKALI Data Merged into BTL file Here are my notes on merging TCARBN and ALKALI for S03:Added TCARBN and ALKALI from file sent by Bronte Tilbrook to Lynne Talley. Found in: whpo.ucsd.edu/data/onetime/southern/s03/original/2000.12.04_SR03_C ARBON_TILBROOK.DIR/s04-sr03_carbon.csvMerged into online file s03hy.txt 19900105WHPOSIOSA 05/14/02 Anderson TCARBN Data Merged into BTL file "Data merged into online file, new CSV file added" Merged TCARBN and ALKALI into online file. Made new exchange file. Added TCARBN and ALKALI from file sent by Bronte Tilbrook to Lynne Talley. Found in: whpo.ucsd.edu/data/onetime/southern/s03/original/2000.12.04_SR03 _CARBON_TILBROOK.DIR/s04-sr03_carbon.csvMerged into online file s03hy.txt 19900105WHPOSIOSA 06/11/02 Kozyr ALKALI Alkalinity and quality flags submitted Bronte Tilbrook from CSIRO has sent me new (corrected) Total Alkalinity values and quality flags for the Section SR03_S04 cruise (EXPOCODE 09AR9404_1 WHP-ID P12 (S04/SR03) DATES 121394 TO 020295). I've made a merging of new data into the CDIAC data set for this cruise. I've put the final data file into your ftp /INCOMING area for you to change your data set alk numbers and quality flags. 06/12/02 Anderson ALKALI BTL, csv & exchange files updated "Data merged into online file, new CSV file online" Merged new ALKALI data submitted by Kozyr into online file (20020514WHPOSIOSA). Made new exchange file. 10/03/02 Kappa DOC Compiled final PDF/TXT files New DOCs online. I have updated the very outdated DOC files with new PDF and Text docs that were just sitting around. Now, the docs look better and I've added CTD, BTL and 14C DQE reports, as well as PI response to the BTL DQE report and his corrections. Apparently the text version was not previously put online as stated above. Old PDF doc required extensive reformatting because the bottom lines of many pages were cut off. In addition to the new reports I reformatted and added, both the PDF and TXT docs now have a first page summary of the cruise; a table of contents; and these data processing notes. The new PDF doc also has links between the figures, tables and appendices and each text reference to them. There are also links from each item in the table of contents to the related text passages. As a final navigation aid I've added "thumbnails" for each page.